Comparison of the therapeutic effect between the simultaneous and staged unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for bilateral knee medial compartment arthritis

Incidence of Postoperative Infection Following Simultaneous Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopedic procedures. Simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty involves performing total knee arthroplasty on both knees in a single anesthetic session. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. A primary search was performed using PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, Web of Science, Clarivate, and Google Scholar databases. Quantitative data synthesis was performed using MedCalc® Statistical Software version 20.115 to determine the pooled prevalence of the infection among patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. We included 30 studies in our quantitative data synthesis, with a total population of 118,502 patients (237,004 knees). The pooled prevalence of superficial infection, deep infection, and unspecified surgical site infection was estimated to be 0.86% (95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.13%), 0.84% (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.05%), and 1.18% (95% confidence interval: 0.45-2.27%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity (I2 >50%) in all analyses, and inspection of funnel plots revealed a symmetrical distribution of plotted data. We found that the infection rates following simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty were relatively low but heterogeneous, as the data showed marked variability. Superficial infections were more common than deep infections; however, there was a small difference in their prevalence. Furthermore, the reliability of our findings was limited owing to significant heterogeneity.

Mortality Following Simultaneous Versus Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) is a common intervention for bilateral knee osteoarthritis, and the choice between simultaneous (SimBTKA) and staged (StaBTKA) procedures remains a critical decision. This meta-analysis systematically reviews and analyzes the existing literature to compare mortality outcomes associated with SimBTKA and StaBTKA. A comprehensive search was conducted across major databases for studies reporting mortality outcomes in SimBTKA and StaBTKA. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies published up to the cutoff date of January 2023, and a total of 37 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Review Manage 5.4 software. The meta-analysis included 86,333 SimBTKA cases and 115,146 StaBTKA cases. The overall mortality rate in SimBTKA was 0.66%, while StaBTKA's was 0.43%. The pooled OR for mortality in SimBTKA versus StaBTKA was 1.55 [1.16, 2.08], indicating a statistically significant higher mortality risk in SimBTKA. Our findings suggest that SimBTKA is associated with an increased risk of mortality compared to StaBTKA. This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the comparative mortality outcomes of SimBTKA and StaBTKA. While SimBTKA may offer potential advantages, including a single anesthesia event and shorter recovery time, clinicians should consider the increased mortality risk associated with this approach. Future research should focus on prospective studies with standardized reporting to further elucidate the nuanced factors influencing mortality outcomes in bilateral knee arthroplasty.

Advantages of Simultaneous Cementless Bilateral Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Staged Surgery

Background

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective procedure, which reduces pain, increases range of motion, and improves function. UKA could be performed simultaneously or in staged sessions. This study aimed to compare bilateral cementless UKA performed simultaneously and in staged sessions in terms of complications, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, and functional outcomes.

Methods

Patients undergoing bilateral UKA for symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 73 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 40 underwent surgery simultaneously and 33 underwent surgery in separate sessions. Operative time, length of hospital stay, change in hemoglobin, need for blood transfusion, complications, and functional outcomes were assessed.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in demographic data. Simultaneously operated patients had a significantly shorter hospital stay and shorter operative time. Statistically significant improvements in clinical scores were noted in both groups. The degree of improvement in functional scores did not differ between the groups. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of complication rates, but the number of periprosthetic tibial fractures was higher in the simultaneous group.

Conclusions

Simultaneous bilateral cementless UKA was more advantageous in terms of cumulative hospital stay and total operation time with similar clinical results when compared to a staged procedure. While the overall complication rate was similar, the rate of periprosthetic fractures was 5% in the simultaneous group.

Can single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty be safely performed in patients over 70?

Background

For patients with bilateral, symptomatic unicompartmental knee arthritis, single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (ssBUKA) presents an attractive option. However, most studies have examined younger patient cohorts and the safety of ssBUKA remains controversial for older individuals. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare complication rates following ssBUKA for patients ≤70 and > 70 years old.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 238 patients having undergone ssBUKA was performed, including 134 patients ≤70 and 104 patients >70. Post-operative complications were recorded at the six-week post-operative visit, along with emergency room visits and hospital readmissions within 90 days.

Results

Compared to patients ≤70, patients >70 were more frequently female (43.3% and 55.8%, respectively) (p = 0.037) and had significantly lower body mass index (30.41 ± 4.64 and 27.30 ± 3.68, respectively) (p < 0.001). Patients >70 were discharged home (50%) less commonly than patients ≤70 (73.1%) (p < 0.001). Two patients ≤70 (1.5%) and two patients >70 (1.9%) sought emergency room treatment (p = 0.589), with respiratory complications most common. There were no differences regarding any postoperative complications between patients ≤70 and > 70 years old.

Conclusion

These results suggest that patients >70 can safely undergo ssBUKA, as it does not appear to increase the incidence of early post-operative complications compared to patients ≤70. However, 50% of patients >70 were not able to discharge directly home following surgery.

True "outpatient discharge" following single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty may be unrealistic for most

BACKGROUND

Single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BUKA) has shown post-operative function and cost benefits over staged bilateral procedures, without increased complications. A rapid discharge protocol at the current study site has reported outpatient discharge for the unilateral procedure exceeding 97%. However, the feasibility of outpatient discharge following BUKA remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the success of achieving outpatient (< 24 h) discharge following BUKA, and identify patient variables associated with failure.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was completed for 104 BUKA patients. All patients with bilateral, symptomatic unicompartmental knee arthritis were offered the single-stage procedure. Data collection included patient demographics, discharge status, and disposition location. Independent t tests (continuous) and Chi-squared tests (categorical) determined differences between discharge (outpatient/inpatient) and disposition (home/other) groups. Variables associated with discharge status and location were assessed with multivariable regression.

RESULTS

While 96 (92.3%) patients discharged within 24 h, only 63.5% were able to discharge directly home. Patients requiring a longer hospital stay (> 24 h) were more likely to require a pre-operative assistive device (62.5% and 25.0%, p = 0.037) and live alone (37.5 vs 8.3%, p = 0.033). For those discharged within 24 h, living alone significantly increased the risk (odds ratio: 5.800, p = 0.038) of requiring an acute inpatient facility prior to transition home.

CONCLUSION

Achieving "true" outpatient discharge is only modestly successful for most BUKA patients, as many required an acute inpatient or short-term rehabilitation facility prior to returning home. BUKA should be differentiated from the unilateral procedure regarding outpatient discharge expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Case-control study; Retrospective comparative study.

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous or Sequential Bilateral Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The risk-benefit profiles of simultaneous total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) compared with sequential TAA continue to be debated. There are limited case series reporting outcomes after bilateral TAA, with no previous comparison of simultaneous TAA with sequential TAA. Patients with bilateral pathology represent a unique population with an overall more debilitating condition. Thus, we aimed to compare bilateral simultaneous and sequential TAAs, including perioperative complications and patient-reported outcome measures.

METHODS

We performed a comparative cohort study of patients who underwent primary bilateral TAA, performed in a simultaneous or sequential fashion, from 2007 to 2019 at a single academic center. Data on patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, perioperative complications, reoperations, and implant failures were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores, and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients (100 ankles) were included, with 25 patients (50 ankles) each in the bilateral simultaneous and sequential cohorts. The mean follow-up was 52.2 ± 27.3 months (range, 24 to 109 months). The mean time between sequential TAAs was 17.5 ± 20.1 months (range, 3 to 74 months). The mean patient age was 64.3 ± 10.6 years (range, 21 to 76 years), and 32 (64.0%) were men. The majority of patients (28 patients [56.0%]) had primary osteoarthritis. Both cohorts had equivalent preoperative patient-reported outcome measures and experienced improvements in all measures, which were maintained at the final follow-up with no significant between-group differences (all p > 0.05). There were no differences between the simultaneous TAA group and the sequential TAA group in perioperative complication rates (22.0% compared with 24.0%; p = 0.7788), reoperations (12.0% compared with 10.0%; p = 0.7354), 5-year reoperation-free survival (88.0% compared with 90.0%; p = 0.4612), or failure-free survival (100%). One patient in the simultaneous TAA cohort required metal component revision at 8 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient-reported outcome measures, complications, and prosthesis survival of patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous TAA were comparable with those of patients who underwent bilateral sequential TAA. We advocate that simultaneous bilateral TAA is a safe and effective method for the treatment of bilateral end-stage ankle osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Simultaneous bilateral shoulder arthroplasty: a case series

BACKGROUND

Staged bilateral shoulder arthroplasty procedures have been shown to have good functional outcomes. The next step is to explore the option of simultaneous bilateral shoulder arthroplasty (SBSA). We report on the first case series of SBSA in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and postoperative complication profile of SBSA and provide a technique reference for surgeons considering performing or investigating this procedure.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective record review of all the SBSA procedures performed by the senior author between 2007 and 2020. Patient demographic characteristics, surgical information, and postoperative data were collected. Data were compiled, and means, standard deviations, and ranges were calculated. Any readmissions or postoperative complications requiring revision were noted. A cohort of patients matched for age, sex, and body mass index with staged (sequential) bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty was analyzed for comparison.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were identified in the simultaneous group (SBSA). The mean age was 64 ± 15 years, with 9 women (69%) and 4 men (31%); the mean body mass index was 29.1 ± 7.5. The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.55 ± 0.7, average blood loss was 364 ± 170 mL (range, 50-600 mL), 5 of 13 patients (38%) underwent blood transfusions, and the mean surgical time was 183 ± 42 minutes. Postoperatively, the mean visual analog scale pain score on postoperative day 1 was 4 ± 2 (range, 0-7), and the mean length of stay was 3.3 days. Postoperative complications included urinary tract infections in 2 patients, urinary retention in 2 patients, and recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 1 patient. No patient was readmitted within 90 days of surgery. One patient underwent a reoperation 2 years postoperatively for symptomatic hardware removal (cerclage cables around the tuberosities). A matched cohort of staged bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty patients was analyzed for comparison. Postoperative complications in the staged group included 1 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patient with subjective instability that was managed with additional physical therapy. There were no documented readmissions within 90 days or revision arthroplasty procedures in either cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

SBSA is a reasonable procedure that can be useful in select patients, with promising short-term safety noted in this series. Prospective randomized studies are needed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the procedure.

One-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a suitable option vs. the two-stage approach: a meta-analysis

To compare one-stage vs. two-stage bilateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) in terms of complications, mortality, reinterventions, transfusion rate, days to discharge, and outcomes for the treatment of bilateral mono-compartmental knee osteoarthritis.

A systematic review was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to February 2021. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and case series describing the use of bilateral UKA were retrieved. A meta-analysis was performed on complications, mortality, reinterventions, transfusion rate, and days to discharge comparing one-stage vs. two-stage replacement, and outcomes were also reported. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Fifteen articles were included on 1451 patients who underwent bilateral UKA (44.9% men, 55.1% women, mean age 66 years). The systematic review documented, for bilateral one-stage UKA: 2.6% major and 5.4% minor complication rates, 0.5% mortality, 1.9% reintervention, 4.1% transfusion rates, and 4.5 mean days to discharge. No studies reported functional differences. The meta-analysis did not find differences for major complications, minor complications, mortality, reintervention, transfusion rates, or days to discharge versus two-stage bilateral procedures. The operative time was 112.3 vs. 125.4 minutes for one-stage and two-stage surgeries, respectively. The overall quality of the retrieved studies was high.

Bilateral single-stage UKA is a safe procedure, with a few complications, and overall positive clinical results. No differences were found in terms of complications, mortality, reinterventions, transfusion rate, and days to discharge in comparison with the two-stage approach.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1063-1072. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210047

Safety and outcome of simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

Purpose

Simultaneous bilateral unicompartmentsl knee arthroplasty (BUKA) is considered safe and effective. We performed a systematic review to assess the postoperative outcomes.

Methods

The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications.

Results

Ten articles were included with 765 simultaneous BUKA. Overall complication rate was 7.0%, survivorship was 97.6% at mean 17 months follow-up. No differences were reported between simultaneous and staged BUKA.

Conclusion

Simultaneous BUKA is as safe as staged BUKA, it is associated with decreased length of stay and operative time, although it has an increased rate of blood transfusion.

A meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes in simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The most common pattern seen in bilateral knee osteoarthritis involves only the medial compartment in both knees. In such cases, bilateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) would be a suitable surgery, this can be done simultaneously in one surgery or in stages with a period of time between each UKA. Simultaneous bilateral UKA in appropriately selected patients have the potential advantages of a lower cost, a shorter hospital stay, and a shorter overall recovery process. Despite this, there are concerns that operating on both knees in one surgery may increase the risk of complications, revisions and mortality.

METHODS

A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus) to identify all studies which investigated either clinical or radiological outcomes in simultaneous bilateral UKA.

RESULTS

All sixteen studies included found that simultaneous bilateral UKA improved clinical and radiological outcomes. Eight studies compared clinical or radiological outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral UKA. Simultaneous bilateral UKA was found to have a significantly shorter length of operation, length of hospital stay, and a lower treatment cost (P < 0.001). Our meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference in the all-cause complication rate between simultaneous and staged bilateral UKA (P = 0.36). Only one study compared radiological outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral UKA which found no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Our review suggests that simultaneous bilateral UKA is comparable to staged bilateral UKA in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes and has the potential to be increasingly adopted in clinical practice due to its superior cost-effectiveness.

Comparison of early post-operative complications following unilateral or single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) demonstrates excellent functional outcomes and patient satisfaction with low complication rates for single compartment knee arthritis. For patients with bilateral symptoms, single-stage bilateral UKA (SSBUKA) provides an alternative to staged procedures but may risk increased blood loss and systemic complications. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare 90-day postoperative complications between unilateral UKA and SSBUKA without exclusion for comorbidities.

METHODS

A retrospective review was completed for 555 consecutive patients having undergone UKA (317 unilateral and 238 bilateral). Data collection included patient demographics and 90-day complications. Independent t-tests (continuous) and Fishers' Exact tests (nominal) were performed to determine differences between unilateral UKA and SSBUKA patients.

RESULTS

The SSBUKA group had more male patients than the unilateral group (51.3% and 43.8%, respectively). There was no difference in age, body mass index or comorbidity classification. More SSBUKA patients experienced nausea than unilateral patients (17.6% and 11.0%), however, no significant differences were observed in the overall incidence of wound or systemic complications, and no transfusions were required. Significantly more unilateral patients (96.2%) were discharged home compared to SSBUKA (63.0%) (p < 0.001). Two SSBUKA (1.7%) and two unilateral UKA (0.6%) patients required readmission within 90-days with systemic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SSBUKA did not increase the risk of early postoperative systemic or wound complications, when performed in all patients with symptomatic disease without exclusion criteria as compared to patients undergoing unilateral UKA. Therefore, SSBUKA can safely be performed on the majority of patients who present to experienced high volume community hospitals.