Long-term results of the iBP elbow prosthesis: beware of destructive metallosis!

Mid-term results of the Latitude primary total elbow arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The Latitude total elbow prosthesis is a third-generation implant, developed to restore the natural anatomy of the elbow. Literature on this prosthesis is scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the mid-term results of the Latitude total elbow prosthesis.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 62 patients (21 men and 41 women). The mean age at the time of surgery was 65 years (range, 28-87 years). The main indication for surgery was inflammatory arthritis. The outcome measures were complications, reoperations, self-reported physical functioning, pain, satisfaction, objectively measured physical functioning, and radiologic signs of loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine survival with revision as the endpoint.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine primary Latitude prostheses were placed in 62 patients between 2008 and 2019. Six patients (7 prostheses) died, 3 elbows underwent revision, and 9 patients were lost to follow-up. A total of 44 patients (50 prostheses) were available for follow-up. The mean length of follow-up was 51 months (range, 10-144 months). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a survival rate of 82% at 10 years after surgery. The main reason for revision was aseptic loosening. Radial head dissociation was seen in 8 patients (24%), but none had complaints. Self-reported and objectively measured physical functioning yielded good results, although 23 patients (46%) did show radiolucent lines on radiographs.

CONCLUSION

Latitude total elbow arthroplasty is considered a successful procedure with low pain scores, high patient satisfaction, and good physical functioning. Survival rates nonetheless remain low and complication rates remain high yet are comparable to those of other elbow arthroplasties. We recommend biomechanical studies to concentrate on specific postoperative loading instructions to minimize wear and consequent loosening.

Long-term outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the functional outcomes, dislocation, and revision rates following total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) at a minimum 10 years' mean follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed a literature search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies were only included if they focused on outcomes post-TEA at a minimum 10 years' mean follow-up.

RESULTS

Our search found 23 studies including 1429 elbows (60.4% linked TEA) that met our inclusion criteria. There were 1276 patients (79.0% female), with an average age of 64.7 years (19-93) and a mean follow-up of 137.2 months (120-216). At final follow-up, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Oxford Elbow Score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 89.1 (35-100), 64.4 (16-48), and 39.2 (3-93), respectively, and 63.3% of patients reported having no pain. The rates of aseptic loosening, infection, implant dislocation, and nerve injury were 12.9%, 3.3%, 4.2%, and 2.1%, respectively. The overall complication and revision rates were 16.3% and 14.6%, respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our systematic review established that TEA offers patients satisfactory clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up, with relatively stable revision and complication rates compared to short and medium term.