Spontaneous humeral torsion deformity correction after displaced supracondylar fractures in children

Cubitus varus deformity following paediatric supracondylar humeral fracture remodelling predominantly in the sagittal direction: A three-dimensional analysis of eighty-six cases

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional (3D) capacity for remodelling in cubitus varus deformity (CVD) after paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (PSHFs) remains unelucidated. This study investigated remodelling patterns after PSHFs by examining 3D deformity distribution over time after injury.

METHODS

Computed tomography (CT) data of 86 patients with CVD after PSHFs were analysed. The 3D deformity angles in the sagittal, coronal, and axial directions were assessed and correlated with the duration between the age at injury and CT evaluation. For the subgroup analysis, we performed the same correlation analysis in a younger (< 8 years old) and an older group (≥ 8 years old); we categorized the duration into early (< 2 years), middle (≥ 2 to < 5 years), and late periods (≥ 5 years) and compared the deformity angles of each direction among the three groups.

RESULTS

Sagittal deformity showed a moderate correlation with the duration of deformity (r = -0.54; P < 0.001), while coronal and axial deformities showed a negligible correlation. Sagittal deformity showed moderate correlations with the duration in the younger group (r = -0.62; P < 0.001) and weak correlations in the older group (r = -0.37; P = 0.091). In the sagittal direction, the deformity angle in the early period was significantly larger than those in the mid and late periods (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences among the three groups in the coronal and axial directions.

CONCLUSION

Sagittal deformities in CVDs are capable of remodelling, especially in the early period and at a younger age, whereas coronal and axial deformities are less likely to undergo remodelling.

The fate of the malrotated elbow supracondylar fractures in children: is varus really a problem?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the functional and cosmetic effects of elbow supracondylar fractures (SCF) in children with residual rotational deformity.

METHODS

Retrospective review cohort of patients with evidence of malrotation after treatment for SCF. An analysis of the postoperative X-ray of 305 consecutive SCF type 3 treated surgically during five years identified 46 elbows with rotational deformity that fulfilled the selection criteria and were recalled for review; only 27 patients agreed to participate. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Clinically, the elbow and shoulder ROM were assessed. The postoperative fracture rotation (PFR) was radiologically measured using the Berdis method. Results were categorized according to Flynn criteria, and functional outcomes were evaluated with the QuickDASH questionnaire. On final assessment, a radiograph of both elbows was obtained, and measures were compared. Descriptive analysis was made calculating median, range, proportions, and confidence intervals. Non-parametric tests were used to test the association between variables.

RESULTS

The group had a median age of four years and a median follow-up of 52 months. Shoulder rotation was asymmetrical in 13 patients; six patients presented a change on carrying angle > 5° (4 varus/2 valgus). The higher the residual rotation, the higher the chances of an altered shoulder rotation (for each degree of PFR, the shoulder rotation was changed to 0.4°). However, there was a low correlation between the amount of rotation and the final carrying angle (r = 0.37). According to Flynn's criteria, over 95% had excellent or good results.

CONCLUSION

There was a weak correlation between varus and rotational malalignment. Patients with moderate residual malrotation could be expected to have a good outcome even if some shoulder rotation changes persist.

Locking plate versus K-wires and cast fixation in lateral closing-wedge osteotomy for cubitus varus deformity

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cubitus varus treatments based on different fixation methods: Locking plate vs. Kirschner-wires (K-wires) and cast fixation.

Methods

This retrospective study of 28 patients was performed in lateral-wedge osteotomy for cubitus varus deformity in our hospital from July 2018 to July 2020. 14 patients in group A were treated by locking plate after lateral closing-wedge osteotomy, whereas other 14 patients were treated by K-wires in group B. We measured the bony union and carrying angle. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed according to the Bellemore criteria.

Results

No nonunion, neurovascular injury or myositis ossificans was noted at follow-up. In group A, 1 patient with lateral condylar prominence was found. In group B, 2 patients with pinning site infection were treated successfully with oral antibiotics and 2 patients needed revision surgery for residual varus. According to the Bellemore criteria, statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups (P = 0.0458). In the present study, no statistically significant difference was noted in the length of incision and operation time between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, the postoperative carrying angle was significantly different at final follow-up between the 2 groups (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Compared with K-wires and cast fixation, we recommend the wedge osteotomy with lateral locking plate to treat the cubitus varus deformity because locking plate could achieve better functional and cosmetic results and stabilize the distal humerus rigidly.

The effects of postoperative malrotation alignment on outcomes of Gartland type III/IV paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures treated by close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of postoperative malrotation alignment on the outcomes of Gartland type III/IV paediatric supracondylar humeral fracture (SCHF) treated by close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2021, 295 Gartland type III/IV paediatric SCHFs treated by close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation were selected for this retrospective study. The demographic, clinical and radiographic parameters of all cases were collected. The lateral rotation percentage (LRP) was measured on X-rays to evaluate postoperative malrotation alignment of the fracture. All cases were categorized into 4 groups according to LRP: LRP ≤ 10% (210, 71.2%), 10% < LRP ≤ 20% (41, 13.9%), 20% < LRP ≤ 30% (26, 8.8%) and LRP > 30% (18, 6.1%). The carrying angle, ranges of multidirectional motions, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Flynn's Standard Score (FSS) of the injured elbow were assessed 6 months postoperation and compared among different groups. ROC analysis based on LRP and the excellent/good rate of FSS was performed to determine the acceptable maximum degree of postoperative malrotation alignment.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the demographic characteristics (age, sex, injured side and fracture type), postoperative Baumann angle, carrying angle or range of forearm rotation among the 4 groups (P > 0.05). The operation time and time from operation to K-wire removal were longer in the 20% < LRP ≤ 30% and LRP > 30% groups than in the LRP < 10% and 10% < LRP ≤ 20% groups (P < 0.001). The shaft condylar angle, range of elbow flexion, MEPS and FSS of the injured elbow 6 months postoperatively were lower in the 20% < LRP ≤ 30% and LRP > 30% groups than in the LRP < 10% and 10% < LRP ≤ 20% groups (P < 0.001). ROC analysis based on LRP and the excellent/good rate of FSS showed an area under the curve of 0.959 (95% CI 0.936-0.983), with a cutoff value of 26.5%, sensitivity of 95.3% and specificity of 90.1%.

CONCLUSION

A certain degree of residual malrotation alignment deformity of the SCHF may reduce the shaft condylar angle and extend the time from operation to removing the K-wire and affect elbow function, especially the range of elbow flexion. The acceptable maximum degree of residual malrotation deformity expressed as the LRP value was 26.5%.

Distal humeral corrective osteotomy for treatment of supracondylar fracture malunions in children

Purpose

This study aimed to determine the functional and radiographic outcomes following corrective distal humeral osteotomies for the treatment of supracondylar fracture malunions in children. We hypothesized that such secondary reconstructive procedures could restore a reasonable and near-normal amount of functionality in a large patient cohort at a tertiary referral center.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological records of 38 children who underwent corrective osteotomy for posttraumatic supracondylar humeral malunion using K-wire fixation. All clinical data were extracted after chart review, including age, sex, dominant side whenever available, follow-up duration, and elbow range of motion preoperatively and at the final visit. Radiographic parameters, including Baumann's angle, humeroulnar angle, humerocondylar angle, and elbow range of motion were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final visit to identify the surgical correction outcomes.

Results

The mean age of the patients at fracture was 5.6 (±2.7) years, and the mean age at surgical intervention was 8.6 (±2.6) years. The mean follow-up period of the current series was 28.2 (±31.1) months. Baumann's angle, humeroulnar angle, and humerocondylar angle were successfully restored to physiological ranges (72.6°, 5.4°, and 36.1°, respectively). Postoperatively, elbow extension improved from -22° (±5.7) to -2.7° (±7.2) versus flexion from 115° (±13.2) to 128.2° (±11.1). Three revision surgeries (8%) were encountered.

Conclusions

Corrective osteotomy of the distal humerus with K-wire fixation is a reliable method to efficiently correct malunion of the distal humerus in different planes, thereby improving elbow range of motion and appearance.

Level of evidence

level IV: Retrospective therapeutic study.

Interventions for treating supracondylar elbow fractures in children

BACKGROUND

Elbow supracondylar fractures are common, with treatment decisions based on fracture displacement. However, there remains controversy regarding the best treatments for this injury.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of interventions for treating supracondylar elbow fractures in children.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in March 2021. We also searched trial registers and reference lists. We applied no language or publication restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing different interventions for the treatment of supracondylar elbow fractures in children. We included studies investigating surgical interventions (different fixation techniques and different reduction techniques), surgical versus non-surgical treatment, traction types, methods of non-surgical intervention, and timing and location of treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We collected data and conducted GRADE assessment for five critical outcomes: functional outcomes, treatment failure (requiring re-intervention), nerve injury, major complications (pin site infection in most studies), and cosmetic deformity (cubitus varus).  MAIN RESULTS: We included 52 trials with 3594 children who had supracondylar elbow fractures; most were Gartland 2 and 3 fractures. The mean ages of children ranged from 4.9 to 8.4 years and the majority of participants were boys. Most studies (33) were conducted in countries in South-East Asia. We identified 12 different comparisons of interventions: retrograde lateral wires versus retrograde crossed wires; lateral crossed (Dorgan) wires versus retrograde crossed wires; retrograde lateral wires versus lateral crossed (Dorgan) wires; retrograde crossed wires versus posterior intrafocal wires; retrograde lateral wires in a parallel versus divergent configuration; retrograde crossed wires using a mini-open technique or inserted percutaneously; buried versus non-buried wires; external versus internal fixation; open versus closed reduction; surgical fixation versus non-surgical immobilisation; skeletal versus skin traction; and collar and cuff versus backslab. We report here the findings of four comparisons that represent the most substantial body of evidence for the most clinically relevant comparisons.  All studies in these four comparisons had unclear risks of bias in at least one domain. We downgraded the certainty of all outcomes for serious risks of bias, for imprecision when evidence was derived from a small sample size or had a wide confidence interval (CI) that included the possibility of benefits or harms for both treatments, and when we detected the possibility of publication bias.  Retrograde lateral wires versus retrograde crossed wires (29 studies, 2068 children) There was low-certainty evidence of less nerve injury with retrograde lateral wires (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.90; 28 studies, 1653 children). In a post hoc subgroup analysis, we noted a greater difference in the number of children with nerve injuries when lateral wires were compared to crossed wires inserted with a  percutaneous medial wire technique (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.81, favours lateral wires; 10 studies, 552 children), but little difference when an open technique was used (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.40, favours lateral wires; 11 studies, 656 children). Although we noted a statistically significant difference between these subgroups from the interaction test (P = 0.05), we could not rule out the possibility that other factors could account for this difference. We found little or no difference between the interventions in major complications, which were described as pin site infections in all studies (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.79; 19 studies, 1126 children; low-certainty evidence). For functional status (1 study, 35 children), treatment failure requiring re-intervention (1 study, 60 children), and cosmetic deformity (2 studies, 95 children), there was very low-certainty evidence showing no evidence of a difference between interventions. Open reduction versus closed reduction (4 studies, 295 children) Type of reduction method may make little or no difference to nerve injuries (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.01, favours open reduction; 3 studies, 163 children). However, there may be fewer major complications (pin site infections) when closed reduction is used (RR 4.15, 95% CI 1.07 to 16.20; 4 studies, 253 children). The certainty of the evidence for these outcomes is low. No studies reported functional outcome, treatment failure requiring re-intervention, or cosmetic deformity. The four studies in this comparison used direct visualisation during surgery. One additional study used a joystick technique for reduction, and we did not combine data from this study in analyses. Surgical fixation using wires versus non-surgical immobilisation using a cast (3 studies, 140 children) There was very low-certainty evidence showing little or no difference between interventions for treatment failure requiring re-intervention (1 study, 60 children), nerve injury (3 studies, 140 children), major complications (3 studies, 126 children), and cosmetic deformity (2 studies, 80 children). No studies reported functional outcome. Backslab versus sling (1 study, 50 children) No nerve injuries or major complications were experienced by children in either group; this evidence is of very low certainty. Functional outcome, treatment failure, and cosmetic deformity were not reported.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found insufficient evidence for many treatments of supracondylar fractures. Fixation of displaced supracondylar fractures with retrograde lateral wires compared with crossed wires provided the most substantial body of evidence in this review, and our findings indicate that there may be a lower risk of nerve injury with retrograde lateral wires. In future trials of treatments, we would encourage the adoption of a core outcome set, which includes patient-reported measures. Evaluation of the effectiveness of traction compared with surgical fixation would provide a valuable addition to this clinical field.