Smartphones for musculoskeletal research - hype or hope? Lessons from a decennium of mHealth studies

Efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral digital therapeutic on psychosocial outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: randomized controlled trial

Cognitive behavioral therapy improves psychosocial outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but access is limited. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral digital therapeutic, reclarit, on psychosocial outcomes in adult RA patients with impaired health-related quality of life. Participants were randomized to reclarit plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus educational and informational material (active control). The primary outcome was SF-36 mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component summary scores at 3 months, with additional assessments at 6 months. reclarit significantly improved SF-36 MCS scores compared to control (mean difference 3.3 [95% CI 0.7, 5.9]; p = 0.014), with high user satisfaction and sustained improvements at 6 months. Depression, anxiety, fatigue, and social/work functioning also improved significantly, while SF-36 PCS, pain, and disability scores did not differ. In conclusion, reclarit offers immediate, effective, evidence-based and personalized psychological support for RA patients.

An offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management caring program effectively improves psychological pressure, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

This study designed an offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management (OOCBSM) caring program, intending to investigate its effect on mental health and quality of life (QoL) using multiple scales in postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

254 postoperative HCC patients were randomly (1:1) allocated into OOCBSM (included a 10-week offline CBSM and subsequent online CBSM until M6) and normal care (NC) groups (10-week NC). Hospital anxiety-and-depression scale (HADS), Zung's self-reporting anxiety (SAS) and depression scale (SDS), FACIT-SP, European quality-of-life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and quality-of-life questionnaire-core30 (QLQ-C30) were assessed over 6 months (M).

RESULTS

HADS-defined-anxiety rates at M3 (P = 0.036) and M6 (P = 0.025), SAS-defined-anxiety rate at M6 (P = 0.049), HADS-defined-depression rates at M3 (P = 0.026) and M6 (P = 0.049), and SDS-defined-depression rates at M3 (P = 0.015) and M6 (P = 0.043) were all lower in OOCBSM group compared to NC group. Furthermore, FACIT-SP scores at M1 (P = 0.004), M3 (P = 0.003), and M6 (P<0.001) were higher in OOCBSM group compared with NC group. EQ-5D scores at M1 (P = 0.025) and M3 (P = 0.030) but not M6 (P = 0.128), and QLQ-C30-symptom score at M3 (P = 0.014) but not M1 (P = 0.198) and M6 (P = 0.058) were lower in OOCBSM group versus NC group; QLQ-C30-global-health-status scores at M3 (P = 0.027) and M6 (P = 0.001) but not M1 (P = 0.312), QLQ-C30-function scores at M3 (P = 0.005) and M6 (P = 0.001) but not M1 (P = 0.084) were higher in OOCBSM group versus NC group. Patients with younger ages or higher education benefited more from OOCBSM.

CONCLUSION

OOCBSM improves psychological pressure, spiritual well-being, and QoL in postoperative HCC patients, especially in those with younger ages or higher education.

Implementation of a hybrid healthcare model in rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases: 6-months results of the multicenter Digireuma study

OBJECTIVES

Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) require a tailored follow-up that can be enhanced by the implementation of innovative tools. The Digireuma study aimed to test the feasibility of a hybrid follow-up utilizing an electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs)-based monitoring strategy in patients with RMDs.

METHODS

Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) were recruited for a 6-month bicentric prospective follow-up consisting of face-to-face and digital assessments. Patients were asked to report disease-specific ePROs on a pre-established basis, and could also report flares, medication changes, and recent infections at any time. Four rheumatologists monitored these outcomes and contacted patients for interventions when deemed necessary. Results from face-to-face and digital assessments were described.

RESULTS

Of 56 recruited patients, 47 (84%) submitted any ePROs to the digital platform. Most patients with RA were female (74%, median age of 47 years), while 48% of patients with SpA were female (median age 40.4 years). A total of 3,800 platform visits were completed, with a median of 57 and 29 visits in patients with RA and SpA, respectively. Among 52 reported alerts, 47 (90%) needed contact, of which 36 (77%) were managed remotely. Adherence rates declined throughout the study, with around half of patients dropping out during the 6 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a hybrid follow-up in clinical practice is feasible. Digital health solutions can provide granular knowledge of disease evolution and enable more informed clinical decision making, leading to improved patient outcomes. Further research is needed to identify target patient populations and engagement strategies.

Digital health in musculoskeletal care: where are we heading?

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders launched a Collection on digital health to get a sense of where the wind is blowing, and what impact these technologies are and will have on musculoskeletal medicine. This editorial summarizes findings and focuses on some key topics, which are valuable as digital health establishes itself in patient care. Elements discussed are digital tools for the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, coupled together with advances in methodologies to analyse health records and imaging. Moreover, the acceptability and validity of these digital advances is discussed. In sum, this editorial and the papers presented in this article collection on Digital health in musculoskeletal care will give the interested reader both a glance towards which future we are heading, and which new challenges these advances bring.

Engagement and attrition with eHealth tools for remote monitoring in chronic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Although eHealth tools are potentially useful for remote disease monitoring, barriers include concerns of low engagement and high attrition. We aimed to summarise evidence on patients' engagement and attrition with eHealth tools for remotely monitoring disease activity/impact in chronic arthritis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted for original articles and abstracts published before September 2022. Eligible studies reported quantitative measures of patients' engagement with eHealth instruments used for remote monitoring in chronic arthritis. Engagement rates were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 8246 references, 45 studies were included: 23 using smartphone applications, 13 evaluating wearable activity trackers, 7 using personal digital assistants, 6 including web-based platforms and 2 using short message service. Wearable-based studies mostly reported engagement as the proportion of days the tracker was worn (70% pooled across 6 studies). For other eHealth tools, engagement was mostly reported as completion rates for remote patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The pooled completion rate was 80%, although between-study heterogeneity was high (I2 93%) with significant differences between eHealth tools and frequency of PRO-collection. Engagement significantly decreased with longer study duration, but attrition varied across studies (0%-89%). Several predictors of higher engagement were reported. Data on the influence of PRO-reporting frequency were conflicting.

CONCLUSION

Generally high patient engagement was reported with eHealth tools for remote monitoring in chronic arthritis. However, we found considerable between-study heterogeneity and a relative lack of real-world data. Future studies should use standardised measures of engagement, preferably assessed in a daily practice setting.

TRIAL REGISTERATION NUMBER

The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021267936).

E-health as a sine qua non for modern healthcare

In each era we need to balance between being able to provide care with our “technical skill, scientific knowledge, and human understanding” (Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 1950) to the individual patient and simultaneously ensure that our healthcare serves all. With the increasing demand of healthcare by an aging population and the lack of specialists, accessible healthcare within a reasonable time frame is not always guaranteed. E-health provides solutions for current situations where we do not meet our own aims of good healthcare, such as restrictions in access to care and a reduction in care availability by a reducing workforce. In addition, telemedicine offers opportunities to improve our healthcare beyond what is possible by in person visits. However, e-health is often viewed as an deficient version of healthcare of low quality. We disagree with this view. In this article we will discuss how to position e-health in the current situation of healthcare, given the continuing rapid development of digital technologies and the changing needs of healthcare professionals and patients. We will address the evolution of e-health towards connected and intelligent systems and the stakeholders perspective, aiming to open up the discussion on e-Health.