A finite element analysis on different bone cement forms and injection volumes injected into lumbar vertebral body in percutaneous kyphoplasty

Biomechanical study between percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with cement pedicle plasty improves vertebral biomechanical stability: A finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the biomechanical effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with cement pedicle plasty (PVCPP) on the unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) through finite element (FE) analysis. The study compares the biomechanical stability of finite element models between percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with cement pedicle plasty.

METHODS

Two patients with unstable OVFs underwent computed tomography (CT) examination at the thoracolumbar vertebral body levels, respectively. The CT images were reconstructed into three-dimensional finite element models to simulate stress conditions across six dimensions and to evaluate the vertebral von Mises stress before and after bone cement reinforcement.

RESULTS

The study found that stress distribution differed between groups mainly at the pedicle base. In the surgical vertebral bodies, the maximum stress in the PVP group decreased during flexion and left bending, while it increased in other states. In the PVCPP group, all maximum stresses decreased. In the inferior vertebral bodies, the maximum stress in the PVP group generally increased, while it decreased in the PVCPP group. In the superior vertebral bodies, postoperatively, the maximum stress in the PVP group generally increased, while it almost remained unchanged in the PVCPP group. PVP group had higher cement stress and displacement.

CONCLUSION

PVCPP is an effective treatment method for patients with unstable OVFs. It can quickly relieve pain and enhance the stability of the three columns, thereby reducing the risk of some complications.

Effect of cement volume on biomechanical response of a spine segment treated with a PEEK polymer implant: a finite element comparative study with vertebroplasty

In the current study, a 3D finite element study was performed to investigate the biomechanical response of an osteoporotic spine segment treated with a novel transpedicular implant (V-STRUT©, Hyprevention, France) made of PEEK (polyetheretherketone) material combined with either injections of 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 cc of cement. The objective was to assess numerically the biomechanical performance of the implant in combination with different doses of the injected bone cement and to compare its performance with the gold standard vertebroplasty (VP) technique. A female (69 yo) was selected and a 3D finite element model of an osteoporotic spine segment was built based on a Computed Tomography (CT) scan performed from T12 to L2 with corresponding intervertebral discs and ligaments. A heterogeneous distribution of bone material properties was assigned to the bone using grey scale levels. Bilateral ellipsoid geometries of the inserted cement were retained for the V-STRUT and VP models based on experimental observation performed on different patients treated with the V-STRUT device. The current study demonstrated an optimal dose of 4 cc of bilaterally injected cement for the V-STRUT and VP techniques to restore the treated segment and confirmed that the V-STRUT device in combination with bone cement is superior to VP alone in establishing the normal stiffness and in reducing the applied stress to the immediately adjacent vertebral levels.

Biomechanical Study of Porcine Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Model Strengthened by Trajectory-Adjustable Bone Cement Filling Device

OBJECTIVE

To establish a porcine osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model and compare the impact of unilateral vertebroplasty using trajectory-adjustable bone cement filling device to traditional surgical tools on vertebral biomechanics.

METHODS

Twenty-four fresh adult porcine vertebrae were used to establish an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. The specimens were divided into 4 groups (A, B, C, and D), each consisting of 6 vertebrae. Group A served as the control group without vertebral augmentation (percutaneous vertebroplasty [PVP]). Patients in Group B underwent unilateral PVP using conventional surgical tools, while patients in Group C underwent bilateral PVP using the same tools. In Group D, patients underwent unilateral PVP with a trajectory-adjustable bone cement filling device. Postoperative X-ray examinations were performed to assess cement distribution and leakage. The compressive stiffness and strength of each spinal unit were evaluated using an electronic mechanical testing machine.

RESULTS

In Groups B, C, and D, the percentages of total cement distribution area were 32.83 ± 3.64%, 45.73 ± 2.27%, and 47.43 ± 3.51%, respectively. The values were significantly greater in Groups C and D than in Group B (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between Groups C and D (P > 0.05). The stiffness after vertebral augmentation in Groups B, C, and D was 1.04 ± 0.23 kN/mm, 1.11 ± 0.16 KN/mm, and 1.15 ± 0.13 KN/mm, respectively, which were significantly greater than that in Group A (0.46 ± 0.06 kN/mm; P < 0.05). The ultimate compressive strengths in Groups B, C, and D were 2.53 ± 0.21 MPa, 4.09 ± 0.30 MPa, and 3.99 ± 0.29 MPa, respectively, all surpassing Group A's strength of 1.41 ± 0.31 MPa. Additionally, both Groups C and D demonstrated significantly greater ultimate compressive strengths than Group B did (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A trajectory-adjustable bone cement filling device was proven to be an effective approach for unilateral vertebroplasty, restoring the biomechanical properties of fractured vertebrae. Compared to traditional surgical tools, this approach is superior to unilateral puncture and yields outcomes comparable to those of bilateral puncture. Additionally, the device ensures a centrally symmetrical distribution pattern of bone cement, leading to improved morphology.

Biomechanical study of different bone cement distribution on osteoporotic vertebral compression Fracture-A finite element analysis

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the biomechanical effects of different bone cement distribution methods on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).

Patients and methods

Raw CT data from a healthy male volunteer was used to create a finite element model of the T12-L2 vertebra using finite element software. A compression fracture was simulated in the L1 vertebra, and two forms of bone cement dispersion (integration group, IG, and separation group, SG) were also simulated. Six types of loading (flexion, extension, left/right bending, and left/right rotation) were applied to the models, and the stress distribution in the vertebra and intervertebral discs was observed. Additionally, the maximum displacement of the L1 vertebra was evaluated.

Results

Bone cement injection significantly reduced stress following L1 vertebral fractures. In the L1 vertebral body, the maximum stress of SG was lower than that of IG during flexion, left/right bending, and left/right rotation. In the T12 vertebral body, compared with IG, the maximum stress of SG decreased during flexion and right rotation. In the L2 vertebral body, the maximum stress of SG was the lowest under all loading conditions. In the T12-L1 intervertebral disc, compared with IG, the maximum stress of SG decreased during flexion, extension, and left/right bending and was basically the same during left/right rotation. However, in the L1-L2 intervertebral discs, the maximum stress of SG increased during left/right rotation compared with that of IG. Furthermore, the maximum displacement of SG was smaller than that of IG in the L1 vertebral bodies under all loading conditions.

Conclusions

SG can reduce the maximum stress in the vertebra and intervertebral discs, offering better biomechanical performance and improved stability than IG.

Biomechanical analysis of sandwich vertebrae in osteoporotic patients: finite element analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical stress of sandwich vertebrae (SVs) and common adjacent vertebrae in different degrees of spinal mobility in daily life.

Materials and methods

A finite element model of the spinal segment of T10-L2 was developed and validated. Simultaneously, T11 and L1 fractures were simulated, and a 6-ml bone cement was constructed in their center. Under the condition of applying a 500-N axial load to the upper surface of T10 and immobilizing the lower surface of L2, moments were applied to the upper surface of T10, T11, T12, L1, and L2 and divided into five groups: M-T10, M-T11, M-T12, M-L1, and M-L2. The maximum von Mises stress of T10, T12, and L2 in different groups was calculated and analyzed.

Results

The maximum von Mises stress of T10 in the M-T10 group was 30.68 MPa, 36.13 MPa, 34.27 MPa, 33.43 MPa, 26.86 MPa, and 27.70 MPa greater than the maximum stress value of T10 in the other groups in six directions of load flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, and left and right rotation, respectively. The T12 stress value in the M-T12 group was 29.62 MPa, 32.63 MPa, 30.03 MPa, 31.25 MPa, 26.38 MPa, and 26.25 MPa greater than the T12 stress value in the other groups in six directions. The maximum stress of L2 in M-T12 in the M-L2 group was 25.48 MPa, 36.38 MPa, 31.99 MPa, 31.07 MPa, 30.36 MPa, and 32.07 MPa, which was greater than the stress value of L2 in the other groups. When the load is on which vertebral body, it is subjected to the greatest stress.

Conclusion

We found that SVs did not always experience the highest stress. The most stressed vertebrae vary with the degree of curvature of the spine. Patients should be encouraged to avoid the same spinal curvature posture for a long time in life and work or to wear a spinal brace for protection after surgery, which can avoid long-term overload on a specific spine and disrupt its blood supply, resulting in more severe loss of spinal quality and increasing the possibility of fractures.

Development of a finite element full spine model with active muscles for quantitatively analyzing sarcopenia effects on lumbar load

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The musculoskeletal imbalance caused by disease is one of the most critical factors leading to spinal injuries, like sarcopenia. However, the effects of musculoskeletal imbalances on the spine are difficult to quantitatively investigate. Thus, a complete finite element spinal model was established to analyze the effects of musculoskeletal imbalance, especially concerning sarcopenia.

METHODS

A finite element spinal model with active muscles surrounding the vertebrae was established and validated from anatomic verification to the whole spine model in dynamic loading at multiple levels. It was then coupled with the previously developed neuromuscular model to quantitatively analyze the effects of erector spinae (ES) and multifidus (MF) sarcopenia on spinal tissues. The severity of the sarcopenia was classified into three levels by changing the physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) of ES and MF, which were mild (60% PCSA of ES and MF), moderate (48% PCSA of ES and MF), and severe (36% PCSA of ES and MF).

RESULTS

The stress and strain levels of most lumbar tissues in the sarcopenia models were more significant than those of the normal model during spinal extension movement. The sarcopenia caused load concentration in several specific regions. The stress level of the L4-L5 intervertebral disc and L1 vertebra significantly increased with the severity of sarcopenia and showed relatively larger values than other segments. From the normal model to a severe sarcopenia model, the stress value of the L4-L5 intervertebral disc and L1 vertebra increased by 128% and 113%, respectively. The strain level of L5-S1 also inclined significantly with the severity of sarcopenia, and the relatively larger capsule strain values occurred at lower back segments from L3 to S1.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the validated spinal coupling model can be used for spinal injury risk analysis caused by musculoskeletal imbalance. The results suggested that sarcopenia can primarily lead to high injury risk of the L4-L5 intervertebral disc, L1 vertebrae, and L3-S1 joint capsule regarding significant stress or strain variance.

Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study

BACKGROUND

Bipedicular/unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty are common treatments for OVCF, and there are no studies to show which is more beneficial for AVCF. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of BPKP or UPKP in the treatment of AVCF.

METHODS

The clinical data of AVCF patients treated by PKP were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach. General demographic data, perioperative complications, and general information related to surgery were recorded for both groups. The preoperative and postoperative vertebral height difference, vertebral local Cobb angle, lumbar pain VAS score and lumbar JOA score were counted for both groups. The above data were compared preoperatively, postoperatively and between the two groups.

RESULTS

25 patients with AVCF were successfully included and all were followed up for at least 12 months, with no complications during the follow-up period. 10 patients in the BPKP group and 15 patients in the UPKP group, with no statistically significant differences in general information between the two groups. The VAS scores of patients in the BPKP group were lower than those in the UPKP group at 12 months after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant, and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups at other follow-up time points. In the BPKP group, 80% of patients had symmetrical and more homogeneous bone cement dispersion. 50% of patients in the UPKP group had a lateral distribution of bone cement and uneven bone cement distribution, and the difference in bone cement distribution between the two groups was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of AVCF, the clinical efficacy of both surgical approaches is basically the same. The distribution of cement is more symmetrical and uniformly diffused in the BPKP group, and the clinical efficacy VAS score is lower in the long-term follow-up. Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty is recommended for the treatment of AVCF.

THE ETHICAL REVIEW BATCH NUMBER

XZXY-LJ-20161208-047.

Comparison of acute single versus multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in radiographic characteristic and bone fragility

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) are common in aged population with bone fragility. This study aimed to identify the radiographic and bone fragility characteristic of acute single and multiple OVCF.

METHODS

OVCF patients hospitalized in a spine center between June 2016 and October 2020 were retrospectively studied. Demographics, comorbidity, bone mineral density, spine trauma, duration of pre-hospital back pain, anatomical location and distribution pattern of OVCF, extent of vertebral marrow edema, and degree of vertebral compression of patients with multi-segment vertebral fractures (MSVF) were summarized and compared to those with single segment vertebral fractures (SSVF).

RESULTS

A total of 1182 patients with 1530 acute fractured vertebrae were included. There were 944 SSVF (79.9%) and 238 MSVF (20.1%) simultaneously involving two (MSVF-2) or three and more vertebra (MSVF-3/m). The Female-Male ratio was 4.4 and differed not significantly between SSVF and MSVF. Females in SSVF were younger than males while MSVF-2 tended to occur in older females. L1, T12, and L2 were the three most frequently fractured vertebra and MSVF involved more vertebra in thoracic and lumbar spine. 31.1% in MSVF-2 and 83.1% in MSVF-3/m had at least two vertebral fractures in adjacent. The fractured thoracolumbar vertebra in MSVF was less compressed than that in SSVF. Apparent spine trauma was reported by 61.4% of SSVF, 44.1% of MSVF-2, and 36.3% of MSVF-3/m, while early hospitalization with pre-hospital back pain ≤ 1 week was 58.9% in SSVF, 45.3% in MSVF-2, and 25.9% in MSVF-3/m. Only females aged 70-80 years old in MSVF-3/m showed lower baseline bone mineral density than in MSVF-2 and SSVF. MSVF were not associated with increased comorbidity of hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, cerebral infarction, and chronic pulmonary disease.

CONCLUSIONS

20% of acute OVCF can involve multiple vertebra without significant spine trauma or lower baseline bone mineral density. Multiple OVCF tend to occur in adjacent vertebra with less thoracolumbar vertebral compression but longer duration of pre-hospital back pain.

Spatiotemporal Regulation of Injectable Heterogeneous Silk Gel Scaffolds for Accelerating Guided Vertebral Repair

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture is jeopardizing the health of the aged population around the world, while the hypoxia microenvironment and oxidative damage of bone defect make it difficult to perform effective tissue regeneration. The balance of oxidative stress and the coupling of vessel and bone ingrowth are critical for bone regeneration. In this study, an injectable heterogeneous silk gel scaffold which can spatiotemporally and sustainedly release bone mesenchymal stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles, HIF-1α pathway activator, and inhibitor is developed for bone repair and vertebral reinforcement. The initial enhancement of HIF-1α upregulates the expression of VEGF to promote angiogenesis, and the balance of reactive oxygen species level is regulated to effectively eliminate oxidative damage and abnormal microenvironment. The subsequent inhibition of HIF-1α avoids the overexpression of VEGF and vascular overgrowth. Meanwhile, complex macroporous structures and suitable mechanical support can be obtained within the silk gel scaffolds, which will promote in situ bone regeneration. These findings provide a new clinical translation strategy for osteoporotic vertebral augmentation on basis of hypoxia microenvironment improvement.

A 20-Year Review of Biomechanical Experimental Studies on Spine Implants Used for Percutaneous Surgical Repair of Vertebral Compression Fractures

A vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is an injury to a vertebra of the spine affecting the cortical walls and/or middle cancellous section. The most common risk factor for a VCF is osteoporosis, thus predisposing the elderly and postmenopausal women to this injury. Clinical consequences include loss of vertebral height, kyphotic deformity, altered stance, back pain, reduced mobility, reduced abdominal space, and reduced thoracic space, as well as early mortality. To restore vertebral mechanical stability, overall spine function, and patient quality of life, the original percutaneous surgical intervention has been vertebroplasty, whereby bone cement is injected into the affected vertebra. Because vertebroplasty cannot fully restore vertebral height, newer surgical techniques have been developed, such as kyphoplasty, stents, jacks, coils, and cubes. But, relatively few studies have experimentally assessed the biomechanical performance of these newer procedures. This article reviews over 20 years of scientific literature that has experimentally evaluated the biomechanics of percutaneous VCF repair methods. Specifically, this article describes the basic operating principles of the repair methods, the study protocols used to experimentally assess their biomechanical performance, and the actual biomechanical data measured, as well as giving a number of recommendations for future research directions.