1
|
Raad M, Kim AH, Durand WM, Kebaish KM. Low bone mineral density: a primer for the spine surgeon. Spine Deform 2024:10.1007/s43390-024-00913-z. [PMID: 39060777 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-024-00913-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Within spinal surgery, low bone mineral density is associated with several postoperative complications, such as proximal junctional kyphosis, pseudoarthrosis, and screw loosening. Although modalities such as CT and MRI can be utilized to assess bone quality, DEXA scans, the "Gold Standard" for diagnosing osteoporosis, is not routinely included in preoperative workup. With an increasing prevalence of osteoporosis in an aging population, it is critical for spine surgeons to understand the importance of evaluating bone mineral density preoperatively to optimize postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to provide surgeons a summary of the evaluation, treatment, and implications of low bone mineral density in patients who are candidates for spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micheal Raad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 601 N Caroline St. 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Andrew H Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 601 N Caroline St. 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Wesley M Durand
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 601 N Caroline St. 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 601 N Caroline St. 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ye X, Li J, Shangguan Z, Wang Z, Chen G, Liu W. Are the facet joint parameters risk factors for cage subsidence after TLIF in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis? EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024:10.1007/s00586-024-08393-5. [PMID: 38967801 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08393-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether preoperative facet joint parameters in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS) are risk factors for cage subsidence (CS) following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS We enrolled 112 patients with L4-5 DS who underwent TLIF and were followed up for > 1 year. Preoperative demographic characteristics, functional areas of paraspinal muscles and psoas major muscles (PS), total functional area relative to vertebral body area, functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) of PS and lumbar spine extensor muscles, normalized FCSA of PS to the vertebral body area (FCSA/VBA), lumbar indentation value, facet joint orientation, facet joint tropism (FT), cross-sectional area of the superior articular process (SAPA), intervertebral height index, vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) value, lordosis distribution index, t-scores, sagittal plane parameters, visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, VAS for leg pain, Oswestry disability index, global alignment and proportion score and European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) were assessed. RESULTS Postoperative CS showed significant correlations with preoperative FO(L3-4), FT (L3 and L5), SAPA(L3-5), L5-HU, FCSA/VBA(L3-4), Pre- T-score, post-6-month VAS for back pain and EQ-5D scores among other factors. According to ROC curve analysis, the optimal decision points for FO(L3-4), L3-SAPA, FCSA/VBA(L3-4), L5-HU, and Pre- T-score were 35.88°, 43.76°,114.93, 1.73, 1.55, 136, and - 2.49. CONCLUSIONS This study identified preoperative FO, SAPA, preoperative CT, Pre- T-score and the FCSA/VBA as independent risk factors for CS after TLIF for DS. These risk factors should enable spinal surgeons to closely monitor and prevent the occurrence of CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoqing Ye
- Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 086-350001, China
| | - Jiandong Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 086-350001, China
| | - Zhitao Shangguan
- Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 086-350001, China
| | - Zhenyu Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 086-350001, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 086-350001, China.
| | - Wenge Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 086-350001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agaronnik ND, Giberson-Chen C, Bono CM. Using advanced imaging to measure bone density, compression fracture risk, and risk for construct failure after spine surgery. Spine J 2024; 24:1135-1152. [PMID: 38437918 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
Low bone mineral density (BMD) can predispose to vertebral body compression fractures and postoperative instrumentation failure. DEXA is considered the gold standard for measurement of BMD, however it is not obtained for all spine surgery patients preoperatively. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that more routinely acquired spine imaging studies such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be opportunistically used to measure BMD. Here we review available studies that assess the validity of opportunistic screening with CT-derived Hounsfield Units (HU) and MRI-derived vertebral vone quality (VBQ) to measure BMD of the spine as well the utility of these measures in predicting postoperative outcomes. Additionally, we provide screening thresholds based on HU and VBQ for prediction of osteopenia/ osteoporosis and postoperative outcomes such as cage subsidence, screw loosening, proximal junctional kyphosis, and implant failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carew Giberson-Chen
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey Building, Suite 3A, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Christopher M Bono
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115; Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey Building, Suite 3A, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey Building, Suite 3A, Boston, MA 02114.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen J, Li Y, Zheng H, Li H, Wang H, Ma L. Hounsfield unit for assessing bone mineral density distribution within lumbar vertebrae and its clinical values. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1398367. [PMID: 38938515 PMCID: PMC11208688 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1398367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective radiological analysis. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the distribution of bone mineral density (BMD) in lumbar vertebrae using the Hounsfield unit (HU) measurement method and investigate the clinical implications of HU values for assessing lumbar vertebrae BMD. Method Two hundred and ninety-six patients were retrospectively reviewed and divided into six groups according to age: Group 1(20-29 years old), Group 2 (30-39 years old), Group 3 (40-49 years old), Group 4 (50-59 years old), Group 5 (60-69 years old), Group 6 (70-79 years old). Six different locations from each vertebra of L1-L5 were selected as regions of interest: the anterior, middle and posterior parts of the upper and lower slices of the vertebrae. HU values were measured for the six regions of interest, followed by statistical analysis. Results The HU values of vertebrae showed a decreasing trend from young patients to elderly patients in Group 1 to Group 5. There was no significant difference in HU values among different vertebrae in the same age group. In all age groups, the HU values of the anterior and posterior part of the vertebral body were significantly different from L1 to L3, with the anterior part of the vertebral body having lower HU values than the posterior part. The HU values of the anterior and posterior part of the vertebral body of L4 and L5 were statistically significant only in Group 5 and Group 6, and the HU values of the anterior part of the vertebral body were lower than those of the posterior part. The HU values of posterior part of L4 and L5 in Group6 were higher than those in Group5. Conclusion Bone mineral density in the lumbar vertebrae is not uniformly distributed, potentially attributed to varying stress stimuli. The assessment of local HU values in the lumbar spine is of significant importance for surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiabao Chen
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yanhong Li
- Department of Internal Medical, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Han Zheng
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Haotian Li
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Haidong Wang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Lei Ma
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Filley A, Baldwin A, Ben-Natan AR, Hansen K, Arora A, Xiao A, Hammond D, Chen C, Tweedt I, Rohde J, Link T, Berven S, Sawyer A. The influence of osteoporosis on mechanical complications in lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2024; 18:100327. [PMID: 38962714 PMCID: PMC11219986 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Background Adults undergoing spine surgery often have underlying osteoporosis, which may be a risk factor for postoperative complications. Although these associations have been described, osteoporosis remains profoundly underdiagnosed and undertreated in the spine surgery population. A thorough, comprehensive systematic review summarizing the relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) and specific complications of lumbar fusion surgery could be a valuable resource for raising awareness and supporting clinical practice changes. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for original clinical research articles reporting on BMD, or surrogate measure, as a predictor of complications in adults undergoing elective lumbar fusion for degenerative disease or deformity. Endpoints included cage subsidence, screw loosening, pseudarthrosis, vertebral fracture, junctional complications, and reoperation. Results A total of 71 studies comprising 12,278 patients were included. Overall, considerable heterogeneity in study populations, methods of bone health assessment, and definition and evaluation of clinical endpoints precluded meta-analysis. Nevertheless, low BMD was associated with higher rates of implant failures like cage subsidence and screw loosening, which were often diagnosed with concomitant pseudarthrosis. Osteoporosis was also a significant risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis, particularly due to fracture. Many studies found surgical site-specific BMD to best predict focal complications. Functional outcomes were inconsistently addressed. Conclusions Our findings suggest osteoporosis is a significant risk factor for mechanical complications of lumbar fusion. These results emphasize the importance of preoperative osteoporosis screening, which allows for medical and surgical optimization of high-risk patients. This review also highlights current practical challenges facing bone health evaluation in patients undergoing elective surgery. Future prospective studies using standardized methods are necessary to strengthen existing evidence, identify optimal predictive thresholds, and establish specialty-specific practice guidelines. In the meantime, an awareness of the surgical implications of osteoporosis and utility of preoperative screening can provide for more informed, effective patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Filley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 435 Warren Drive, Apt 11, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Avionna Baldwin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 435 Warren Drive, Apt 11, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alma Rechav Ben-Natan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Keith Hansen
- Department of General Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ayush Arora
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 435 Warren Drive, Apt 11, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Angel Xiao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 435 Warren Drive, Apt 11, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Deana Hammond
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 435 Warren Drive, Apt 11, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Caressa Chen
- Loyola University Medical Center; Maywood IL, USA
| | - Isobel Tweedt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 435 Warren Drive, Apt 11, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Western University of Health Sciences College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, USA
| | - James Rohde
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, USA
| | - Thomas Link
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imagery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sigurd Berven
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 435 Warren Drive, Apt 11, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Aenor Sawyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 435 Warren Drive, Apt 11, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jiang L, Liu L, Dong L, Xu Z, Zhang X, Qian L. Comparison of instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:108. [PMID: 38310205 PMCID: PMC10837938 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07214-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) have been widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disease. However, it remains controversial as whether posterior internal fixation is required when LLIF is performed. This meta-analysis aims to compare the radiographic and clinical results between instrumented and stand-alone LLIF. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Collaboration Library up to March 2023 were searched for studies that compared instrumented and stand-alone LLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The following outcomes were extracted for comparison: interbody fusion rate, cage subsidence rate, reoperation rate, restoration of disc height, segmental lordosis, lumbar lordosis, visual analog scale (VAS) scores of low-back and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. RESULTS 13 studies involving 1063 patients were included. The pooled results showed that instrumented LLIF had higher fusion rate (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.16-3.75; P = 0.01), lower cage subsidence (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.37-0.68; P < 0.001) and reoperation rate (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.79; P = 0.02), and more restoration of disc height (MD 0.85; 95% CI 0.18-1.53; P = 0.01) than stand-alone LLIF. The ODI and VAS scores were similar between instrumented and stand-alone LLIF at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Based on this meta-analysis, instrumented LLIF is associated with higher rate of fusion, lower rate of cage subsidence and reoperation, and more restoration of disc height than stand-alone LLIF. For patients with high risk factors of cage subsidence, instrumented LLIF should be applied to reduce postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianghai Jiang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, People's Republic of China
| | - Lantao Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, People's Republic of China
| | - Liang Dong
- Department of Orthopedic, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
| | - Zhengwei Xu
- Department of Orthopedic, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaobo Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Lixiong Qian
- Department of Orthopedic, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bokov A, Kalinina S, Khaltyrov M, Pavlova S, Bulkin A. Supplementary posterior fusion in patients operated on employing TLIF may decrease the instrumentation failure rate. Front Surg 2023; 10:1259946. [PMID: 38186390 PMCID: PMC10766769 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1259946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background It is supposed that additional posterior fusion may provide additional stability of the pedicle screw; however, the clinical impact of additional posterior fusion in patients treated with TLIF remains uncertain. The objective of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of circumferential fusion in patients treated with TLIF. Materials and methods This is a single-center retrospective evaluation of consecutive 179 patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis and instability of spinal segments. Patients with axial pain and neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy associated with spinal stenosis were enrolled during the period from 2012 to 2018. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with a single cage was used to treat patients. In 118 cases a supplementary posterior fusion was made. The duration of follow-up accounted for 24 months, logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors that influence the complication rate. Results The rate of pedicle screw loosening was growing with radiodensity getting decreased and was more frequent in patients with two level fusion. An increase in pedicle screw loosening rate correlated with anterior nonunion Tan 2 and 3 grade while both posterior complete and incomplete fusion resulted in a decline in the complication rate. Lumbosacral fusion, bilateral facet joints` resection and laminectomy turned out to be insignificant factors. The overall goodness of fit of the estimated general multivariate model was χ2 = 87.2230; P < 0.0001. To confirm clinical relevance of those findings, a univariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between clinically significant pedicle screw instability and posterior fusion in patients operated on employing TLIF. The results of logistic regression analysis demonstrate that additional posterior fusion may decrease the rate of instrumentation failure that requires revision surgery in patients treated with TLIF [B0 = 1.314321; B1 = -3.218279; p = 0.0023; OR = 24.98507; 95% CI (3.209265; 194.5162), the overall goodness of fit of the estimated regression was χ2 = 22.29538, p = <0.0001]. Conclusion Circumferential fusion in patients operated on employing TLIF is associated with a decline in the rate of pedicle screw loosening detected by CT imaging and clinically significant instrumentation failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey Bokov
- Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Svetlana Kalinina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Mingiyan Khaltyrov
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Svetlana Pavlova
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Anatoliy Bulkin
- Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pu X, Wang D, Gu S. Advances in Hounsfield units value for predicting cage subsidence on spinal interbody fusion surgery. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:3149-3157. [PMID: 37306798 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07805-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A growing number of studies have demonstrated that Hounsfield units (HU) value can effectively assess bone quality and predict cage subsidence (CS) after spinal surgery. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the utility of the HU value for predicting CS after spinal surgery and to raise some of the unresolved questions in this field. METHODS We searched on PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library for studies correlating HU value to CS. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies were included in this review. We found that HU value can predicted the risk of CS effectively after spinal surgery. Moreover, the HU value of the cancellous vertebral body and the cortical endplate were used for predicting CS, in comparison, the measurement method of HU value in the cancellous vertebral body was more standardized, but which region is more important to CS remains unknown. Different cutoff thresholds of HU value have been established in different surgical procedures for predicting CS. The HU value may be superior to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for CS prediction; however, the usage standard of HU value has not been well established. CONCLUSIONS The HU value shows great potential for predicting CS and constitutes an advantage over DEXA. However, general consensuses about how CS is defined and HU is measured, which part of HU value is more important, and the appropriate cutoff threshold of the HU value for osteoporosis and CS still require exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingxiao Pu
- Department of Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, 245# Panlong, Renmingdonglu, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Daxing Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, 245# Panlong, Renmingdonglu, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Shao Gu
- Department of Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, 245# Panlong, Renmingdonglu, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|