Usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: short-term outcomes: a single-center and retrospective analysis

Usability, Acceptability, and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Techniques in Surgical Coaching and Training: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

To define the current state of peer-reviewed literature demonstrating the usability, acceptability, and implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques in surgical coaching and training.

DESIGN

We conducted a literature search with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We searched five scholarly databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase via Elsevier, Scopus via Elsevier, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Healthcare Administration Database via ProQuest. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.

RESULTS

Only 4 articles met the inclusion criteria and used standardized methods for performance evaluation with expert observation. We found no literature examining the impact on performance, user acceptance, or implementation of AI/ML techniques used for surgical coaching and training. We highlight the need for qualitative and quantitative research demonstrating these techniques' effectiveness before broad implementation.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

We emphasize the need for research to specifically evaluate performance, impact, user acceptance, and implementation of AI/ML techniques. Incorporating these facets of research when developing AI/ML techniques for surgical training is crucial to ensure emerging technology meets user needs without increasing cognitive burden or frustrating users.

Evaluation of the advantage of surgeons certified by the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system participating in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection

Background

A technical qualification system was developed in 2004 by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. An analysis of the EnSSURE study on 3188 stage II-III rectal cancer patients, which was performed by including the participation of qualified surgeons as assistants and advisers without restricting their participation as operators, revealed that the participation of technically qualified surgeons in surgery improved the technical and oncological safety of laparoscopic rectal resection.

Aim

This secondary retrospective analysis of the EnSSURE study examined the advantage of qualified surgeons participating in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR).

Methods

The outcomes of low anterior resection were compared between groups with and without the participation of surgeons qualified by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (Q and non-Q groups, respectively). We used propensity score matching to generate paired cohorts at a one-to-one ratio. The postoperative complication rate, short-term results (hemorrhage volume, operative time, number of dissected lymph nodes, open conversion rate, intraoperative complication rate, and R0 resection rate), and long-term results (disease-free survival rate, local recurrence rate, and overall survival rate) were evaluated.

Results

The frequencies of postoperative complications, anastomotic bleeding, and intraperitoneal abscess were significantly lower, the operative time was significantly shorter, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter, and the number of dissected lymph nodes was higher in the Q group. No significant differences were observed in disease-free survival, local recurrence, or overall survival rate rates between the groups.

Conclusion

The participation of qualified surgeons in LAR is technically advantageous.

A surgical training system designed to help trainees acquire laparoscopic surgical skills at a rural Japanese institute

PURPOSE

The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System was established in Japan to evaluate safe endoscopic surgical techniques and teaching skills. Trainee surgeons obtaining this certification in rural hospitals are disadvantaged by the limited number of surgical opportunities. To address this problem, we established a surgical training system to educate trainee surgeons.

METHODS

Eighteen certified expert surgeons affiliated with our department were classified into an experienced training system group (E group, n = 9) and a non-experienced group (NE group, n = 9). Results of the training system were then compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The number of years required to become board certified was shorter in the E group (14 years) than that in the NE group (18 years). Likewise, the number of surgical procedures performed before certification was lower in the E group (n = 30) than that in the NE group (n = 50). An expert surgeon was involved in the creation of the certification video of all the E group participants. A questionnaire to board-certified surgeons revealed that guidance by a board-certified surgeon and trainee education (surgical training system) was useful for obtaining certification.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous surgical training, starting with trainee surgeons, appears useful for expediting their acquisition of technical certification in rural areas.

Specialty-Certified Colorectal Surgeons Demonstrate Favorable Short-term Surgical Outcomes for Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection: Assessment of a Japanese Nationwide Database

BACKGROUND

There are few studies on the impact of a colorectal-specific technically certified surgeon on good surgical outcomes for laparoscopic low anterior resection in the real world.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with the participation of a certified colorectal surgeon.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese nationwide database.

SETTING

This study was conducted as a project for the Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.

PATIENTS

This study included 41,741 patients listed in the National Clinical Database who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection performed by certified, noncertified, and colorectal-specific certified surgeons, according to the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System, from 2016 to 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Operative mortality rate and anastomotic leak rate were the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day mortality and operative mortality were 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively, without significant differences between all kinds of certified and noncertified surgeon groups. Overall anastomotic leak rate was 9.3%, with a significant difference between the 2 groups. Colorectal- and stomach-certified groups had lower 30-day mortality and operative mortality than the biliary-certified and noncertified groups. The anastomotic leak rate was the lowest in the colorectal-certified group. Based on a logistic regression analysis using the risk-adjusted model, operative mortality was significantly higher in the biliary-certified group than in the colorectal-certified group. Moreover, anastomotic leak rate was significantly lower in the colorectal-certified group than in the stomach-certified and noncertified groups.

LIMITATIONS

This study was a retrospective study, and there was a possibility of different definitions of anastomotic leak due to the use of a nationwide database.

CONCLUSIONS

The participation of a colorectal-specific certified surgeon may decrease the risk of operative mortality and anastomotic leak for laparoscopic low anterior resection.

CIRUJANO COLORRECTAL ALTAMENTE CALIFICADO PROVOCA RESULTADOS QUIRRGICOS FAVORABLES A CORTO PLAZO PARA LA RESECCIN ANTERIOR BAJA LAPAROSCPICA EVALUACIN DE LA BASE DE DATOS NACIONAL JAPONESA

ANTECEDENTES:Hay pocos estudios sobre el impacto de un cirujano certificado técnicamente especializado en cáncer colorrectal con un buen resultado quirúrgico para la resección anterior baja laparoscópica en el mundo real.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados a corto plazo de la resección anterior baja laparoscópica con la participación de un cirujano colorrectal certificado.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que utilizó una base de datos nacional japonesa.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó como un proyecto para la Sociedad Japonesa de Cirugía Endoscópica y la Sociedad Japonesa de Cirugía Gastroenterológica.PACIENTES:este estudio incluyó a 41 741 pacientes incluidos en la base de datos clínica nacional que se sometieron a una resección anterior baja laparoscópica realizada por cirujanos certificados, no certificados y certificados específicamente colorrectales, según el Sistema de calificación de habilidades quirúrgicas endoscópicas de 2016 a 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La tasa de mortalidad operatoria y la tasa de fuga anastomótica fueron los resultados primarios.RESULTADOS:La mortalidad general a los 30 días y la mortalidad operatoria fueron del 0,2 % y el 0,3 %, respectivamente, sin diferencias significativas entre los grupos de todos los tipos de cirujanos certificados y no certificados. La tasa global de fuga anastomótica fue del 9,3 %, con una diferencia significativa entre los dos grupos. Los grupos con certificación colorrectal y estomacal tuvieron una mortalidad a los 30 días y una mortalidad operatoria más bajas que los grupos con certificación biliar y sin certificación. La tasa de fuga anastomótica fue la más baja en el grupo certificado colorrectal. Con base en un análisis de regresión logística utilizando el modelo ajustado por riesgo, la mortalidad operatoria fue significativamente más alta en el grupo con certificación biliar que en el grupo con certificación colorrectal. Además, la tasa de fuga anastomótica fue significativamente más baja en el grupo con certificación colorrectal que en los grupos con certificación estomacal y sin certificación.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio fue retrospectivo y existía la posibilidad de diferentes definiciones de fuga anastomótica debido al uso de una base de datos nacional.CONCLUSIONES:La participación de un cirujano certificado en video específico colorrectal puede disminuir el riesgo de mortalidad operatoria y fuga anastomótica para la resección anterior baja laparoscópica. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Automatic Surgical Skill Assessment System Based on Concordance of Standardized Surgical Field Development Using Artificial Intelligence

Importance

Automatic surgical skill assessment with artificial intelligence (AI) is more objective than manual video review-based skill assessment and can reduce human burden. Standardization of surgical field development is an important aspect of this skill assessment.

Objective

To develop a deep learning model that can recognize the standardized surgical fields in laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection and to evaluate the feasibility of automatic surgical skill assessment based on the concordance of the standardized surgical field development using the proposed deep learning model.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective diagnostic study used intraoperative videos of laparoscopic colorectal surgery submitted to the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery between August 2016 and November 2017. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to September 2022.

Interventions

Videos of surgery performed by expert surgeons with Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) scores higher than 75 were used to construct a deep learning model able to recognize a standardized surgical field and output its similarity to standardized surgical field development as an AI confidence score (AICS). Other videos were extracted as the validation set.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Videos with scores less than or greater than 2 SDs from the mean were defined as the low- and high-score groups, respectively. The correlation between AICS and ESSQS score and the screening performance using AICS for low- and high-score groups were analyzed.

Results

The sample included 650 intraoperative videos, 60 of which were used for model construction and 60 for validation. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the AICS and ESSQS score was 0.81. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the screening of the low- and high-score groups were plotted, and the areas under the ROC curve for the low- and high-score group screening were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

The AICS from the developed model strongly correlated with the ESSQS score, demonstrating the model's feasibility for use as a method of automatic surgical skill assessment. The findings also suggest the feasibility of the proposed model for creating an automated screening system for surgical skills and its potential application to other types of endoscopic procedures.

Usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a Japanese multicenter analysis

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer (TCC) can be technically demanding due to the anatomical complexity of the region. In Japan, the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was established to improve the skill of laparoscopic surgeons and further develop surgical teams. We examined the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic colectomy for TCC and evaluated the effects of the Japanese ESSQS in facilitating this approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 136 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for TCC between April 2016 and December 2021. Patients were divided into an ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (surgery performed by an ESSQS-qualified surgeon, n = 52) and a non ESSQS-qualified surgeon (surgery performed by a non ESSQS-unqualified surgeon, n = 84). Clinicopathological and surgical features were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications occurred in 37 patients (27.2%). The proportion of patients who developed postoperative complications was lower in the ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (8.0%) than that in the non ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (34.5%; p < 0.017). Multivariate analysis revealed "Operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeon surgeon" (odds ratio (OR) 0.360, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.140-0.924; p = 0.033), blood loss (OR 4.146, 95% CI 1.688-10.184; p = 0.002), and clinical N status (OR 4.563, 95% CI 1.814-11.474; p = 0.001) as factors independently associated with postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

The present multicenter study confirmed the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colectomy for TCC and revealed that ESSQS-qualified surgeon achieved better surgical outcomes.

Mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open colectomy for pathological T4 and/or N2 colon cancer patients: Multicenter study using propensity score matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess mid-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery (LAP) vs open surgery (OP) for pathological T4 (pT4) and/or N2 (pN2) colon cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 255 primary tumor resections for pT4 and/or pN2 colon cancer performed from 2015 to 2020 at six hospitals, divided into LAP (n = 204) and OP groups (n = 51). After propensity score matching to minimize selection bias, 47 matched patients per group were assessed.

RESULTS

Before matching, the rate of males (53.9% vs. 37.3%, P = .042), left sided colon cancer (53.9% vs 37.3%, P = .042), D3 lymph node dissection (90.7% vs 68.6%, P < .001) and body mass index (kg/m2 ) (22.3 vs 21.8, P = .039) were significantly greater in the LAP group. The rate of pT4b (7.8% vs 40.4%, P < .001) was lower and pN2 was higher (57.4% vs 37.3%, P = .012) in the LAP group. After matching, preoperative characteristics and pathologic status were equivalent between the groups. The LAP and OP groups showed comparable overall survival (OS) (2-year OS, 84.5% vs 76.8%, P = .055) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (2-year RFS, 73.9% vs 52.8%, P = .359). In the patients with pT4, OS (2-year OS, 79.4% vs 75.7%, P = .359) and RFS (2-year RFS, 71.3% vs 58.7%) were comparable. In the patients with pN2, OS (2-year OS, 83.4% vs 76.3%) and RFS (2-year RFS, 69.6% vs 36.2%) were also comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

LAP for pT4 and/or pN2 colon cancer showed comparable mid-term outcomes compared with OP. LAP was an acceptable surgical approach in this cohort.

Universal meta-competencies of operative performances: a literature review and qualitative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Prioritizing patient health is essential, and given the risk of mortality, surgical techniques should be objectively evaluated. However, there is no comprehensive cross-disciplinary system that evaluates skills across all aspects among surgeons of varying levels. Therefore, this study aimed to uncover universal surgical competencies by decomposing and reconstructing specific descriptions in operative performance assessment tools, as the basis of building automated evaluation system using computer vision and machine learning-based analysis.

METHODS

The study participants were primarily expert surgeons in the gastrointestinal surgery field and the methodology comprised data collection, thematic analysis, and validation. For the data collection, participants identified global operative performance assessment tools according to detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thereafter, thematic analysis was used to conduct detailed analyses of the descriptions in the tools where specific rules were coded, integrated, and discussed to obtain high-level concepts, namely, "Skill meta-competencies." "Skill meta-competencies" was recategorized for data validation and reliability assurance. Nine assessment tools were selected based on participant criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 189 types of skill performances were extracted from the nine tool descriptions and organized into the following five competencies: (1) Tissue handling, (2) Psychomotor skill, (3) Efficiency, (4) Dissection quality, and (5) Exposure quality. The evolutionary importance of these competences' different evaluation targets and purpose over time were assessed; the results showed relatively high reliability, indicating that the categorization was reproducible. The inclusion of basic (tissue handling, psychomotor skill, and efficiency) and advanced (dissection quality and exposure quality) skills in these competencies enhanced the tools' comprehensiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The competencies identified to help surgeons formalize and implement tacit knowledge of operative performance are highly reproducible. These results can be used to form the basis of an automated skill evaluation system and help surgeons improve the provision of care and training, consequently, improving patient prognosis.

The usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a single-center, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching

PURPOSE

Recently, a new certification system called the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) has been launched in Japan to improve surgical safety. This study aimed to determine whether ESSQS-qualified surgeons affect the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

METHODS

A total of 187 colon cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy at Kindai University Hospital between January 2016 and December 2020 were enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups based on surgeries performed by ESSQS-qualified surgeons (QS group) and non-ESSQS-qualified surgeons (NQS group). The short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

After PSM, 43 patients from each group were included in the matched cohort. In the short-term outcomes, the total operative time was significantly longer in the NQS group than in the QS group (229 vs. 174 min, p < 0.0001). However, there were no significant differences in the two groups regarding blood loss (0 vs. 0 ml, p = 0.7126), conversion (0.0% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.0779), Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2 complications (9.3% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.6933), mortality (2.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.3145), and postoperative hospital stay (9 vs. 9 days, p = 0.5357). In the long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the 3-year overall survival (86.6% vs. 83.0%, p = 0.8361) and recurrence-free survival (61.7% vs. 72.0%, p = 0.3394).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy performed by ESSQS-qualified surgeons contributed to shorter operative time. Under the supervision of ESSQS-qualified surgeons, almost equivalent safety and oncological outcomes are expected even in surgeries performed by non-ESSQS-qualified surgeons.

Audit of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in Morocco: A report of the results of a prospective multicentre cohort study

Background

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusions

•

Laparoscopy is the standard technique for colon cancer in rich countries. Little data exists about lower income countries.

•

We evaluated laparoscopy for colon cancer by comparing it to open colon resections in a low-mid income country.

•

We found that Laparoscopy is performed by few surgeons, who apply strict patient selection for laparoscopic cases.

•

Patients in the laparoscopy group also had lower quality resections compared to open surgery.

•

The challenges identified will require more focus on training, certification, centralization, and standardisation of care.

Impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification on Laparoscopic Resections for Rectal Cancer in Japan: The EnSSURE Study

Objective

This cohort study investigated short- and long-term postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic procedures for rectal cancer performed with versus without certified surgeons.

Background

In Japan, the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) evaluates surgical skills deemed essential for laparoscopic surgery; however, it is unknown whether this certification contributes to procedural safety.

Methods

Outcomes of laparoscopic rectal resections for cStage II and III rectal cancer performed from 2014 to 2016 at 56 Japanese hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. The impact of having versus not having certified surgeons on postoperative complications and other short- and long-term outcomes were assessed. In cases with ESSQS-certified surgeons, surgeons attended surgery in the capacity of an operator, assistant, scope operator, or advisor.

Results

Overall, 3188 procedures were analyzed, with 2644 procedures performed with and 544 without ESSQS-certified surgeons. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that the adjusted odds ratio of postoperative complications after procedures performed with ESSQS-certified surgeons was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.91; P = 0.009). The adjusted odds ratios for conversion and pathological R0 resection rates with ESSQS-certified surgeons were 0.20 (P < 0.001) and 2.10 (P = 0.04), respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses showed significantly shorter surgical duration and more harvested lymph nodes for operations performed with ESSQS-certified surgeons. Multivariate Cox regression showed that the adjusted hazard ratios for poor overall and recurrence-free survival after operations performed with ESSQS-certified surgeons were 0.88 (P = 0.35) and 1.04 (P = 0.71), respectively.

Conclusions

This study showed the superiority of the short-term postoperative results for laparoscopic rectal procedures performed with ESSQS-certified surgeons.

Institutional variation in survival and morbidity in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: From the data of a randomized controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic surgery (JCOG0404)

BACKGROUND

Institutional variation in outcomes is a key factor to ascertain the generalizability of results and reliability of the clinical trial. This study evaluated institutional variation in survival and postoperative complications using data from JCOG0404 comparing laparoscopic colectomy (LAP) with open colectomy (OP).

METHODS

Institutions with fewer than 10 registered patients were excluded from this analysis. Institutional variation was evaluated in terms of early postoperative complications, overall survival, and relapse-free survival and estimated using a mixed-effect model with institution as a random effect after adjusting for background factors.

RESULTS

This analysis included 1028 patients in the safety analysis and 1040 patients in the efficacy analysis from 26 institutions. In the safety analysis, there was no variation in grades 3-4 early postoperative complications (in OP, median 6.3% [range 6.3%-6.3%]; in LAP, median 2.6% [range 2.6%-2.6%]), but some variation in grades 1-4 early postoperative complications was observed (in OP, median 20.8% [range 13.2%-31.8%]; in LAP, median 11.9% [range 7.2%-28.7%]), and that in grades 2-4 was observed only in LAP (median 8.8% [range 4.7%-24.0%]; in OP, median 12.7% [range 12.7%-12.7%]). Two specific institutions showed especially high incidences of postoperative complications in LAP. In the efficacy analysis, there was no institutional variation in OP, although a certain variation was observed in LAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Some institutional variations in safety and efficacy were observed, although only in LAP. We conclude that a qualification system, including training and education, is needed when new surgical techniques such as laparoscopic surgery are introduced in clinical practice.

Effect of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic multivisceral resection: Japanese multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of laparoscopic multivisceral resection (Lap-MVR) has been reported by several experienced high-volume centers. The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was established in Japan to improve the skill of laparoscopic surgeons and further develop surgical teams. We examined the safety and feasibility of Lap-MVR in general hospitals, and evaluated the effects of the Japanese ESSQS for this approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 131 patients who underwent MVR between April 2016 and December 2019. Patients were divided into the laparoscopic surgery group (LAC group, n = 98) and the open surgery group (OPEN group, n = 33). The clinicopathological and surgical features were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the OPEN group, BMI was significantly higher (21.9 vs 19.3 kg/m², p = 0.012) and blood loss was lower (55 vs 380 ml, p < 0.001) in the LAC group. Operation time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay were similar between the groups. ESSQS-qualified surgeons tended to select the laparoscopic approach for MVR (p < 0.001). In the LAC group, ESSQS-qualified surgeons had superior results to those without ESSQS qualifications in terms of blood loss (63 vs 137 ml, p = 0.042) and higher R0 resection rate (0% vs 2.0%, p = 0.040), despite having more cases of locally advanced tumor. In addition, there were no conversions to open surgery among ESSQS-qualified surgeons, and three conversions among surgeons without ESSQS qualifications (0% vs 15.0%, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed blood loss (odds ratio 1.821; 95% CI 1.324-7.654; p = 0.010) as an independent predictor of postoperative complications. Laparoscopic approach was not a predictive factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The present multicenter study confirmed the feasibility and safety of Lap-MVR even in general hospitals, and revealed superior results for ESSQS-qualified surgeons.

Accreditation as a qualified surgeon improves surgical outcomes in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

PURPOSE

The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Quantification System for qualified surgeons (QSs) was introduced in Japan to improve surgical outcomes. This study reviewed the surgical outcomes after initial experience performing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and evaluated the improvement in surgical outcomes following accreditation as a QS.

METHODS

Eighty-seven consecutive patients who underwent LDG for gastric cancer by a single surgeon were enrolled in this study. The cumulative sum method was used to analyze the learning curve for LDG. The surgical outcomes were evaluated according to the two phases of the learning curve (learning period vs. mastery period) and accreditation (non-QS period vs. QS period).

RESULTS

The learning period for LDG was 48 cases. Accreditation was approved at the 67th case. The operation time and estimated blood loss were significantly reduced in the QS period compared to the non-QS period (230 vs. 270 min, p < 0.001; 20.5 vs. 59.8 ml, p = 0.024, respectively). Furthermore, the major complication rate was significantly lower in the QS period than in the non-QS period (0 vs. 10.6%, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Experience performing approximately 50 cases is required to reach proficiency in LDG. After receiving accreditation as a QS, the surgical outcomes, including the complication rate, were improved.

Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients' outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the short-term and oncological impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery on the operator performing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was based on medical records from a multicentre database. A total of 417 patients diagnosed with stage II/III colon and rectosigmoid cancer treated with curative resection were divided into two groups according to whether they were operated on by qualified surgeons (Q group, n=352) or not (NQ group, n=65). Through strict propensity score matching, 98 cases (49 in each group) were assessed.

RESULTS

Operative time was significantly longer in the NQ group than in the Q group (199 vs. 168 min, p=0.029). The amount of blood loss, post-operative complications, and duration of hospitalisation were similar between both groups. No mortality was observed. One conversion case was seen in the NQ group. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 86.6% in the NQ group and 88.2% in the Q group, which was not statistically significant (log-rank p=0.966).

CONCLUSION

Direct operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeons contributed to a shortened operation time. Under an organised educational environment, almost equivalent safety and oncological outcomes are expected regardless of the surgeon's qualifications.

Educational system for acquiring appropriate laparoscopic colorectal surgical skills: analysis in a Japanese high-volume cancer center

BACKGROUND

Acquiring appropriate laparoscopic technique is necessary to safely perform laparoscopic surgery. The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System of the Japanese Society of Endoscopic Surgery, which was established to improve the quality of laparoscopic surgery in Japan, provides training to become an expert laparoscopic surgeon. In this study, we describe our educational system, in a Japanese highest volume cancer center, and evaluate the system according to the pass rate for the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System examination.

METHODS

We assessed 14 residents who trained for more than 2 years from 2012 to 2018 in our department. All teaching surgeons, qualified by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System, participated in all surgeries as supervisors. For the first 3 months, trainees learned as the scopist, then as the first assistant for 3 months, and then by performing laparoscopic surgery as an operator during ileocecal resection or sigmoidectomy. Trainees apply for this training in their second year of residency or later. All laparoscopic procedures in our department are standardized in detail.

RESULTS

The cumulative pass rate was 75% (12/16), and 87% (12/14) of the trainees eventually passed, while the general pass rate was approximately 30%. On average, those who passed in their second or third year had experienced 94 procedures as the surgeon, 177 as the first assistant, and 199 as the scopist. The number of laparoscopic procedures and the learning curves did not differ between successful and failed applicants.

CONCLUSIONS

Through our educational system, residents successfully acquired laparoscopic skills with a much higher pass rate in the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System examination than the general standard. Laparoscopic practice under supervision by experienced surgeons with standardized procedures and accurate understanding of the relevant anatomy is very helpful to achieving appropriate laparoscopic technique.