Investigation and management of moderate to severe inpatient hyponatraemia in an Australian tertiary hospital

Hyponatremia in geriatric patients

Hyponatremia is the most frequent electrolyte imbalance in geriatric medicine. Causes of hyponatremia were retrospectively analyzed in all in-patients treated in 2016 (N = 2267, 1564 women, 703 men, mean age ± standard deviation 81.9 ± 7.6 years). Any form of hyponatremia on admission, during the stay or on discharge was noted in 308 patients (13.6%, 231 women, 77 men; mean age ± standard deviation 83.1 ± 7.3 years, p = 0.009 vs. age of all patients). Women had a higher probability of developing hyponatremia compared to men (p = 0.019), 131 patients were hypovolemic, and dyspnea as an indicator of hypervolemia was noted in 71 patients.Only 12 patients suffering from hyponatremia (3.9%) did not receive any of the potentially sodium-lowering drugs assessed (diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, antidepressants, neuroleptics, nonsteroidal antirheumatics, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine). The median number of drugs per patient potentially lowering the plasma sodium level was 3 and the maximum number was 7.Hypovolemic hyponatremia and the syndrome of inadequate antidiuretic hormone secretion were the most important causes of hyponatremia. Adverse drug effects were the main origins of both conditions. In patients with hyponatremia the drug load influencing plasma sodium level should be minimized, thiazide diuretics should be avoided and older individuals should receive a diet with sufficient salt content.

Use of Urea for the Syndrome of Inappropriate Secretion of Antidiuretic Hormone: A Systematic Review

Importance

Hyponatremia and the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) are associated with significant mortality and morbidity. The effectiveness and safety of oral urea for SIADH are still debated.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of urea for the treatment of SIADH.

Evidence Review

A systematic search of Medline and Embase was conducted for controlled and uncontrolled studies of urea for SIADH in adult patients. The primary outcome was serum sodium concentration after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS), intracranial pressure, and resource use such as length of stay.

Findings

Twenty-three studies involving 537 patients with SIADH were included, of which 462 were treated with urea. The pooled mean baseline serum sodium was 125.0 mmol/L (95% CI, 122.6-127.5 mmol/L). The median treatment duration with oral urea was 5 days. Urea increased serum sodium concentration by a mean of 9.6 mmol/L (95% CI, 7.5-11.7 mmol/L). The mean increase in serum sodium after 24 hours was 4.9 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.5-9.3 mmol/L). Adverse events were few, mainly consisting of distaste or dysgeusia, and no case of ODS was reported. Resource use was too infrequently reported to be synthesized.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review of the use of urea in SIADH and despite the lack of randomized clinical trials, lower-quality evidence was identified that suggests that urea may be an effective, safe, and inexpensive treatment modality that warrants further exploration.

Inappropriate therapy of euvolemic hyponatremia, the most frequent type of hyponatremia in SARS-CoV-2 infection, is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients

Introduction

Admission hyponatremia, frequent in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, has been associated with increased mortality. However, although euvolemic hyponatremia secondary to the Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis (SIAD) is the single most common cause of hyponatremia in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), a thorough and rigorous assessment of the volemia of hyponatremic COVID-19 subjects has yet to be described. We sought to identify factors contributing to mortality and hospital length-of-stay (LOS) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients admitted with hyponatremia, taking volemia into account.

Method

Retrospective study of 247 patients admitted with COVID-19 to a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain from March 1st through March 30th, 2020, with a glycemia-corrected serum sodium level (SNa) < 135 mmol/L. Variables were collected at admission, at 2nd-3rd day of hospitalization, and ensuing days when hyponatremia persisted. Admission volemia (based on both physical and analytical parameters), therapy, and its adequacy as a function of volemia, were determined.

Results

Age: 68 years [56-81]; 39.9% were female. Median admission SNa was 133 mmol/L [131- 134]. Hyponatremia was mild (SNa 131-134 mmol/L) in 188/247 (76%). Volemia was available in 208/247 patients; 57.2% were euvolemic and the rest (42.8%) hypovolemic. Hyponatremia was left untreated in 154/247 (62.3%) patients. Admission therapy was not concordant with volemia in 43/84 (51.2%). In fact, the majority of treated euvolemic patients received incorrect therapy with isotonic saline (37/41, 90.2%), whereas hypovolemics did not (p=0.001). The latter showed higher mortality rates than those receiving adequate or no therapy (36.7% vs. 19% respectively, p=0.023). The administration of isotonic saline to euvolemic hyponatremic subjects was independently associated with an elevation of in-hospital mortality (Odds Ratio: 3.877, 95%; Confidence Interval: 1.25-12.03).

Conclusion

Hyponatremia in COVID-19 is predominantly euvolemic. Isotonic saline infusion therapy in euvolemic hyponatremic COVID-19 patients can lead to an increased mortality rate. Thus, an exhaustive and precise volemic assessment of the hyponatremic patient with CAP, particularly when due to COVID-19, is mandatory before instauration of therapy, even when hyponatremia is mild.

Oral Urea Supplementation in the Treatment of Acute Hyponatremia among Hospitalized Adults: A Systematic Review

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disturbance among hospitalized adults. Oral urea is currently recommended in Europe in the treatment of chronic hyponatremia; no published systematic review investigating oral urea for acute hyponatremia among hospitalized adults exists. An oral urea supplement became available in the United States in 2016. This was a systematic review investigating the use of oral urea in the treatment of acute hyponatremia among hospitalized adults. Pubmed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published between 1998 and 2021. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool; strength of the evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. Changes in serum sodium and measures of safety and tolerance were reported. Eight studies were identified that met inclusion criteria, which included a total of 296 patients. Seven studies were retrospective. All studies found an increase in serum sodium levels associated with oral urea supplementation. Side effects were minimal; one patient discontinued urea due to a side effect (dysgeusia). Urea dose/duration varied among the studies. Based on the serious risk of bias and GRADE criteria, the strength of the evidence was considered low. Oral urea supplementation was associated with increases in serum sodium concentrations among hospitalized adults with hyponatremia, and appears to be safe and well tolerated in this population. Prospective controlled trials are needed to establish the efficacy, comparative effectiveness, and potential cost savings of this therapy.Key teaching pointsHyponatremia is associated with negative clinical outcomes among hospitalized adults.Oral urea is now available in the United States, and is currently recommended in Europe to treat chronic hyponatremia.This systematic review shows that oral urea supplementation may be associated with increases in serum sodium levels among hospitalized adults with hyponatremia, and appears safe and well-tolerated; however, the studies reviewed here are at high risk of bias and the available evidence is of low quality, making any recommendation drawn from this data weak.Prospective controlled trials are needed to establish the efficacy, comparative effectiveness, and potential cost savings of oral urea supplementation for hyponatremia.

Approach to the Patient: Hyponatremia and the Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis (SIAD)

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disturbance seen in clinical practice, affecting up to 30% of acute hospital admissions, and is associated with significant adverse clinical outcomes. Acute or severe symptomatic hyponatremia carries a high risk of neurological morbidity and mortality. In contrast, chronic hyponatremia is associated with significant morbidity including increased risk of falls, osteoporosis, fractures, gait instability, and cognitive decline; prolonged hospital admissions; and etiology-specific increase in mortality. In this Approach to the Patient, we review and compare the current recommendations, guidelines, and literature for diagnosis and treatment options for both acute and chronic hyponatremia, illustrated by 2 case studies. Particular focus is concentrated on the diagnosis and management of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. An understanding of the pathophysiology of hyponatremia, along with a synthesis of the duration of hyponatremia, biochemical severity, symptomatology, and blood volume status, forms the structure to guide the appropriate and timely management of hyponatremia. We present 2 illustrative cases that represent common presentations with hyponatremia and discuss the approach to management of these and other causes of hyponatremia.

Hyponatraemia and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) in cancer

Hyponatraemia is a common electrolyte abnormality seen in a wide range of oncological and haematological malignancies and confers poor performance status, prolonged hospital admission and reduced overall survival, in patients with cancer. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) is the commonest cause of hyponatraemia in malignancy and is characterised by clinical euvolaemia, low plasma osmolality and concentrated urine, with normal renal, adrenal and thyroid function. Causes of SIAD include ectopic production of vasopressin (AVP) from an underlying tumour, cancer treatments, nausea and pain. Cortisol deficiency is an important differential in the assessment of hyponatraemia, as it has an identical biochemical pattern to SIAD and is easily treatable. This is particularly relevant with the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which can cause hypophysitis and adrenalitis, leading to cortisol deficiency. Guidelines on the management of acute, symptomatic hyponatraemia recommend 100 mL bolus of 3% saline with careful monitoring of the serum sodium to prevent overcorrection. In cases of chronic hyponatraemia, fluid restriction is recommended as first-line treatment; however, this is frequently not feasible in patients with cancer and has been shown to have limited efficacy. Vasopressin-2 receptor antagonists (vaptans) may be preferable, as they effectively increase sodium levels in SIAD and do not require fluid restriction. Active management of hyponatraemia is increasingly recognised as an important component of oncological management; correction of hyponatraemia is associated with shorter hospital stay and prolonged survival. The awareness of the impact of hyponatraemia and the positive benefits of active restoration of normonatraemia remain challenging in oncology.

Are Further Interventions Needed to Prevent and Manage Hospital-Acquired Hyponatraemia? A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of IV Fluid Prescribing Practices

BACKGROUND

Hyponatraemia is associated with increased morbidity, increased mortality and is frequently hospital-acquired due to inappropriate administration of hypotonic fluids. Despite several attempts to minimise the risk, knowledge is lacking as to whether inappropriate prescribing practice continues to be a concern.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was performed in Danish emergency department physicians in spring 2019. Prescribing practices were assessed by means of four clinical scenarios commonly encountered in the emergency department. Thirteen multiple-choice questions were used to measure knowledge.

RESULTS

201 physicians responded corresponding to 55.4% of the total population of physicians working at emergency departments in Denmark. About a quarter reported that they would use hypotonic fluids in patients with increased intracranial pressure and 29.4% would use hypotonic maintenance fluids in children, both of which are against guideline recommendations. Also, 29.4% selected the correct fluid, a 3% hypertonic saline solution, for a patient with hyponatraemia and severe neurological symptoms, which is a medical emergency. Most physicians were unaware of the impact of hypotonic fluids on plasma sodium in acutely ill patients.

CONCLUSION

Inappropriate prescribing practices and limited knowledge of a large number of physicians calls for further interventions to minimise the risk of hospital-acquired hyponatraemia.

Urea treatment in fluid restriction-refractory hyponatraemia

OBJECTIVE

Hyponatraemia in hospitalized patients is common and associated with increased mortality. International guidelines give conflicting advice regarding the role of urea in the treatment of SIADH. We hypothesized that urea is a safe, effective treatment for fluid restriction-refractory hyponatraemia.

DESIGN

Review of urea for the treatment of hyponatraemia in patients admitted to a tertiary hospital during 2016-2017. Primary end-point: proportion of patients achieving a serum sodium ≥130 mmol/L at 72 hours.

PATIENTS

Urea was used on 78 occasions in 69 patients. The median age was 67 (IQR 52-76), 41% were female. Seventy (89.7%) had hyponatraemia due to SIADH-CNS pathology (64.3%) was the most common cause. The duration was acute in 32 (41%), chronic in 35 (44.9%) and unknown in the rest.

RESULTS

The median nadir serum sodium was 122 mmol/L (IQR 118-126). Fluid restriction was first-line treatment in 65.4%. Urea was used first line in 21.8% and second line in 78.2%. Fifty treatment episodes (64.1%) resulted in serum sodium ≥130 mmol/L at 72 hours. In 56 patients who received other prior treatment, the mean sodium change at 72 hours (6.9 ± 4.8 mmol/L) was greater than with the preceding treatments (-1.0 ± 4.7 mmol/L; P < 0.001). Seventeen patients (22.7%) had side effects (principally distaste), none were severe. No patients developed hypernatraemia, overcorrection (>10 mmol/L in 24 hours or >18 mmol/L in 48 hours), or died.

CONCLUSIONS

Urea is safe and effective in fluid restriction-refractory hyponatraemia. We recommend urea with a starting dose of ≥30 g/d, in patients with SIADH and moderate to profound hyponatraemia who are unable to undergo, or have failed fluid restriction.