Elkabany AH, Hakim AAA, Mahmoud SA, Gaweesh YY. Clinical and biochemical assessment of the soft tissue response to titanium stock versus custom composite resin healing abutments.
J Prosthet Dent 2024:S0022-3913(24)00458-X. [PMID:
39060157 DOI:
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.022]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Custom healing abutments made of flowable composite resin have gained popularity, although the soft tissue response to composite resin has not been adequately studied.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the soft tissue response to titanium stock healing abutments and custom composite resin healing abutments by assessing clinical indices and the level of matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A randomized controlled clinical trial was performed on 42 osseointegrated implants. The implants were divided into 2 groups: a test group comprising 21 custom composite resin healing abutments that were attached to the implants at second stage surgery and a control group comprising 21 stock titanium healing abutments. Plaque index (PL), bleeding on probing (BOP), modified gingival index (MGI), and level of MMP8 were measured at the second and fourth week after second stage surgery. Peri-implant crevicular fluid was collected by paper points at each follow-up, and the level of MMP8 was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. For statistical analysis, group comparisons used the Mann-Whitney U test, and comparisons within each group at 2 and 4 weeks used the Wilcoxon Sign Rank test. Group differences were analyzed with the Fisher exact test, and the McNemar test was used to compare percentages at 2 and 4 weeks. All tests were two-tailed (α=.05).
RESULTS
For the PI, no statistically significant differences were found within groups or between groups (P>.05). Bleeding on probing was positive in 14.3% of titanium abutments versus 20% of composite resin abutments at 4 weeks, with no significant difference between groups (P>.05). Similarly, the mean MGI was 0.38 ±0.5 in the control group while it was 0.4 ±0.5 in the test group, with no significant differences between groups (P>.05). The MMP8 level at 2 weeks was 11.1 ±8.65 and 13.11 ±9.29 for the control and test groups, respectively while it was 16.35 ±8.31 and 19.80 ±8.44 at 4 weeks, showing a statistically significant increase within groups (P<.05). No significant difference between groups was detected at either follow-up time point regarding MMP8 level (P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical and biochemical soft tissue response to composite resin healing abutments and titanium stock healing abutments were comparable, suggesting the clinical safety of custom composite resin healing abutments.
Collapse