The potential of a lecture series in changing intent and experience among health professionals to conduct research in a large hospital: a retrospective pre-post design

Clinical Research Primer for Medical Students: Overview and Illustrative Experiences

Background  The ability to participate in clinical scholarship is a foundational component of modern evidence-based medical practice, empowering improvement across essentially every aspect of clinical care. In tandem, the need for comprehensive exposure to clinical research has been identified as a critical component of medical student training and preparation for residency that is underserved by traditional undergraduate medical education models. The goal of the current work was to provide guidelines and recommendations to assist novice medical students in taking ownership of their research education. Methods  The Clinical Research Primer was composed from pooled research documents compiled by the study authors and our institutional neurosurgery student research group. The Primer was then structured as the natural evolution of a research project from its inception through the submission process. Results  We divided the foundational components of the Clinical Research Primer into seven domains, each representing a landmark in the development of a peer-reviewed study, and a set of skills critical for junior scholars to develop. These vital components included the following: pitching and designing clinical studies, developing a research workflow, navigating the Institutional Review Board, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing and editing, submission mechanics, and tracking research projects for career development. Conclusion  We anticipate that the tools included in the Clinical Research Primer will increase student research productivity and preparedness for residency. Although our recommendations are informed by our experiences within neurosurgery, they have been written in a manner that should generalize to almost any field of clinical study.

Implementing a Statewide Speakers Bureau to Address Maternal Morbidity and Mortality

OBJECTIVE

To implement a speakers bureau to educate providers, health caregivers, and staff practicing within Tennessee hospitals on evidence-based practice recommendations related to opioid use disorder in pregnancy, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal hypertension, and implicit bias.

DESIGN

Quality improvement project.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

Multiple health care facilities throughout Tennessee, where rates of pregnancy-related mortality are greater than the national average and where Black women are three times as likely as White women to die of pregnancy complications.

PARTICIPANTS

Speakers (n = 47) included obstetricians, advanced practice providers, and nurses. Program attendees (n = 369) included providers and caregivers representing five health care facilities.

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

Speakers were provided standardized training to disseminate best practice methods. Current evidence-based presentations regarding the top maternal mortality concerns were formatted for educational events at five Tennessee health care facilities. Independent outcome measures using electronic survey instruments were collected for speakers and audience participants. Speakers evaluated training methods, and participants evaluated the quality and efficacy of the information provided.

RESULTS

Based on speaker evaluations, 70.59% rated the quality of training as 5 of 5, and 76.47% rated the relevance of training as 5 of 5. Overall, 16 of 17 (94.1%) speakers stated that adequate training was provided. Analysis of participant evaluations reported that 57.5% were very confident (5/5) that the information learned through the speakers bureau will improve their care of pregnant and postpartum people. Additionally, 71% were very likely (5/5) to apply the information to their practice.

CONCLUSION

This project showed the dissemination of best practices by promoting knowledge, supporting practice change, and improving retained information in maternity providers and caregiver participants. Implementation of speakers bureaus to educate providers and caregivers within health care facilities has the potential to influence practice change and decrease maternal morbidity and mortality rates in the state of Tennessee.

Research education and training for nurses and allied health professionals: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Research capacity building (RCB) initiatives have gained steady momentum in health settings across the globe to reduce the gap between research evidence and health practice and policy. RCB strategies are typically multidimensional, comprising several initiatives targeted at different levels within health organisations. Research education and training is a mainstay strategy targeted at the individual level and yet, the evidence for research education in health settings is unclear. This review scopes the literature on research education programs for nurses and allied health professionals, delivered and evaluated in healthcare settings in high-income countries.

METHODS

The review was conducted systematically in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Eleven academic databases and numerous grey literature platforms were searched. Data were extracted from the included full texts in accordance with the aims of the scoping review. A narrative approach was used to synthesise findings. Program characteristics, approaches to program evaluation and the outcomes reported were extracted and summarised.

RESULTS

Database searches for peer-reviewed and grey literature yielded 12,457 unique records. Following abstract and title screening, 207 full texts were reviewed. Of these, 60 records were included. Nine additional records were identified on forward and backward citation searching for the included records, resulting in a total of 69 papers describing 68 research education programs. Research education programs were implemented in fourteen different high-income countries over five decades. Programs were multifaceted, often encompassed experiential learning, with half including a mentoring component. Outcome measures largely reflected lower levels of Barr and colleagues' modified Kirkpatrick educational outcomes typology (e.g., satisfaction, improved research knowledge and confidence), with few evaluated objectively using traditional research milestones (e.g., protocol completion, manuscript preparation, poster, conference presentation). Few programs were evaluated using organisational and practice outcomes. Overall, evaluation methods were poorly described.

CONCLUSION

Research education remains a key strategy to build research capacity for nurses and allied health professionals working in healthcare settings. Evaluation of research education programs needs to be rigorous and, although targeted at the individual, must consider longer-term and broader organisation-level outcomes and impacts. Examining this is critical to improving clinician-led health research and the translation of research into clinical practice.

Rethinking Health Professionals’ Motivation to Do Research: A Systematic Review

Background

Health professionals’ engagement in translational health and medical research (HMR) is fundamental to evidence-based practice leading to better patient health outcomes. However, there is a decline in the number of health professionals undertaking research which has implications for patient health and the economy. Informed by the motivation-based expectancy-value-cost (EVC) and self determination theories (SDT), this systematic literature review examined the barriers and facilitators of health professionals’ (HPs) motivation to undertake research.

Methods

The literature was searched between 2011 and 2021 for relevant peer-reviewed articles written in English, using CINAHL Complete, Informit, Medline Ovid, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. This systematic review was performed and reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Identified barriers to HPs’ engagement with research included the lack of knowledge, skills, and competence to conduct research, lack of protected research time, lack of funding and lack of organisational support. Integration of the findings of this review based on the EVC and SDT theories indicate that research capacity, ie, expectancy and competence is highly influenced by attitude, ie, the type of value (attainment, intrinsic or utility) and connection attributed to research. HPs who had very positive attitude towards research demonstrated all three values and were keen to take up research despite the barriers. Those who had a positive attitude were only motivated to do research because of its utility value and did not necessarily see it as having personal relevance for themselves. HPs who were unmotivated did not see any personal connection or relatedness to the research experience and saw no value in research.

Conclusion

The attitude HPs hold in their value of research is a catalyst for motivation or amotivation to engage in research as it directly influences the relevance of barriers. Facilitators that expedite the research journey have been attributed to research training, mentorship programs and supportive organisational research culture. Motivation of HPs explored through EVC and SDT is critical to the maintenance of a research culture and the clinician-researcher development pipeline.