Moving forward the Italian nursing education into the post-pandemic era: findings from a national qualitative research study

Factors that influence happiness of nursing students according to COVID-19 infection status

BACKGROUND

Happiness is a cognitive and emotional evaluation of one's life, and the upward approach affects satisfaction and happiness throughout life. Because nursing students must experience medical settings closely related to COVID-19 infection through clinical practice, they are vulnerable to exposure to infection and academic stress, and are also sensitive to personal life satisfaction and happiness. In this study, Korean nursing students who experienced the COVID-19 pandemic during the COVID-19 endemic era were divided into nursing students infected with COVID-19 and non-infected nursing students. By identifying the effects of college life adaptation, leisure satisfaction from club activities, and family health on happiness, which are individual sub-factors of happiness, we intend to provide basic data for the development of intervention programs for promoting their happiness.

METHODS

Data were collected from October 4, 2023 to November 15, 2023. The subjects were 343 students enrolled in five nursing schools in four major cities (D, G, K, and Y) in Korea. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

For COVID+ students, happiness was significantly affected by adaptation to campus life and family strengths. This model had r2 = 0.401; i.e., it explained 40.1% of the variability in happiness. For COVID0 students, happiness was significantly affected by adaptation to campus life and subjective health status, with r2 = 0.346.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate the necessity of developing a happiness-promotion program for nursing students.

The effectiveness of serious games on undergraduate nursing students' knowledge and skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To determine the effect of serious games on undergraduate nursing students by the meta-analysis method.

BACKGROUND

There is a need for greater focus on enhancing the knowledge and skills of undergraduate nursing students. Generation Z students desire active engagement in the learning process. When compare with conventional learning approaches, serious games can enhance pupil interest by making the learning process more captivating.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHOD

A total of nine databases were systematically searched from inception to April 2024. The Cochrane RoB-2 tool and the Joanna Brigg's Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for quasi-experimental designs were used to undertake quality appraisal. A narrative synthesis, a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to analyze the study outcomes.

RESULTS

In the study, 19 experimental studies included 14 randomized controlled trials and five quasi-experimental studies. When compare with control groups, serious games in RCTs showed significant improvements in knowledge (SMD 1.24, 95 % CI 0.52-1.96; P<0.001) and skills (SMD 0.50, 95 % CI 0.13-0.87; P<0.01). Subgroup analysis for technical skills outcomes demonstrated that serious games in RCTs were more effective than control groups (SMD 0.62, 95 % CI 0.20-1.05; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Serious games had a beneficial impact on the knowledge and skills of undergraduate nursing students. In the context of serious game intervention, it is imperative to carefully consider the approach.

Nursing Education During the SARS-COVID-19 Pandemic: The Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)

In the pandemic, nursing programs found a way to continue the training process through virtual classrooms and technological tools to support the teaching and learning process. The aim of the present research was to analyze the existing literature on the methodologies and technologies used in nursing education during the pandemic. Methods and results, in this context, were integrative review of the literature through the SciELO, PubMed, CUIDEN, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCO), Redalyc, and Dialnet databases, by running a search on the use of the keywords "nursing students," "new technology," and "pandemic," for literature published between 2020 and 2022. As a search strategy, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart was used. Finally, the virtualization of nursing teaching has been positive in giving continuity to the training process, and student learning has been verified. However, there is evidence that some actions and skills are not possible at the moment with the available methodologies and tools and still require attendance for some practical activities.

Perceived competences by graduated nurses before and during COVID-19 restrictions: A repeated cross-sectional study from 2019 to 2022

AIMS

To explore the differences, if any, in the competences perceived by newly graduated nurses who attended their education before and during the COrona VIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) restrictions.

BACKGROUND

Nursing education has undergone significant changes because of the COVID-19 restrictions. However, to date the perceived competences at the point of graduation have not been investigated over the restrictions years compared with the pre-restrictions era.

DESIGN

A repeated cross-sectional study followed by a pseudo-panel analysis. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist was used. Data on individual, nursing programme and perceived competences with Nurse Competence Scale (NCS) were collected and analysed by also using a pseudo-panel approach.

METHODS

Two universities were involved. Those eligible were nursing students who graduated: (1) in 2020 (=323) as the first post-COVID-19 group, who were studying in the 3rd year at the onset of the restrictions; (2) in 2021 (=250) as the second post-COVID-19 graduated group, who were in the 2nd year at the restrictions onset; and (3) in 2022 (=247) as the third post-COVID-19 group, attending the 1st year of nursing education at the onset of the restrictions. Data were compared with those who graduated in 2019 (=336, pre-COVID-19 group).

RESULTS

The overall NCS score was higher in the pre-COVID-19 group (68 out of 100, 95 % Confidence of Interval [IC] 66.4-69.5), lower in the first post-COVID-19 graduates (62.9, 95 % CI 60-65.8), higher in the second (66.6, 95 % CI 63.6-69.4) and lower again in the third post-COVID-19 group (63.8, 95 % CI 60.9-66.5). A sinusoidal pattern also emerged for the frequency of use of the competences from the pre-COVID-19 (2.3 out of 3) and the first group (2.1) and increased between the second and the third group (from 2.1 to 2.3) (p< 0.001). These sinusoidal trends are also evident in the pseudo-panel analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A different degree of perceived competences at the point of graduation emerged, with higher competences in the pre-restrictions group, lower in the first post-COVID-19 generation, higher again in the second and third group. However, all scores were over 60 points out of 100, thus indicating sufficient competences. The frequency of use of such competences slightly changed over the years with limited practical relevance. The findings may inform reflections regarding innovations in the clinical placements pathways as well as in the strategies supporting newly graduates nurses in their transition from education to health-care settings.

The potential influences of professional identity for undergraduate nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study

AIM

We aimed to investigate the level of undergraduate nursing students' professional identity (PI) during the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential influences.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 742 undergraduate nursing students from Chengdu Medical College. Basic demographics, personal characteristics and PI score were collected. Chi-squared test, one-way analysis of variance, and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

In the classes of 2019, 2020, and 2021, the PI score was 96.85 ± 18.26, 105.37 ± 17.46, 106.67 ± 22.08 (P < .001). PI score was the independent predictive factor for both "want to be a nurse" and "willingness to serve during COVID-19 or other pandemics".

CONCLUSIONS

PI contributes greatly to nursing students' willingness to be a nurse and overcome pandemics. The challenge of culturing PI during COVID-19 pandemic revealed the necessity of developing individual management strategies for nursing education.

Nursing students' evaluation of clinical learning environment and supervision models before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The COVID-19 pandemic has required a rapid reorganization of clinical training and supervision models for nursing education. The aim of this study was to compare students' levels of perception of the quality of the Clinical Learning Environment (CLE) using two different clinical supervision models.

METHODS

A comparative design was implemented. A convenience sample of second and third-year undergraduate nursing students (n=127) in clinical training in the 2018/2019 Academic Year (AY) received the usual nursing staff supervision model, while during the COVID-19 pandemic in the following year, they (n=69) received an individualized supervision model. Data were collected using three instruments: the Clinical Learning Environmental Quality Evaluation Index (CLEQI); the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale (CLES+T); and a socio-demographic tool.

RESULTS

The mean total scores of both scales had increased in the second survey (CLEQI: M=57.88±11.8 vs. M=60.88±9.3, p=0.035; CLES+T: M=148.4±23.3 vs. M=154.5±21.9, p=0.037). The nursing students reported high levels of CLE quality with both supervision models, even though the individualized supervision model was rated significantly higher by the students than the staff supervision model.

CONCLUSIONS

Students supported by a personal supervisor during clinical training had a more positive experience and rated the quality of the tutorial strategies, learning opportunities, safety and nursing care, leadership style of the ward manager and overall CLE more highly.

Lessons learnt while designing and conducting a longitudinal study from the first Italian COVID-19 pandemic wave up to 3 years

BACKGROUND

Several scientific contributions have summarized the "lessons learnt" during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but only a few authors have discussed what we have learnt on how to design and conduct research during a pandemic. The main intent of this study was to summarize the lessons learnt by an Italian multidisciplinary research group that developed and conducted a longitudinal study on COVID-19 patients infected during the first wave in March 2020 and followed-up for 3 years.

METHODS

A qualitative research approach embedded into the primary CORonavirus MOnitoRing study (CORMOR) study was developed, according to the the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Multiple data collection strategies were performed: each member was invited to report the main lessons learnt according to his/her perspective and experience from the study design throughout its conduction. The narratives collected were summarized and discussed in face-to-face rounds. The narratives were then thematically analysed according to their main topic in a list that was resent to all members to check the content and their organization. The list of the final "lessons learnt" has been agreed by all members, as described in a detailed fashion.

RESULTS

Several lessons were learnt while designing and conducting a longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic and summarised into ten main themes: some are methodological, while others concern how to conduct research in pandemics/epidemics/infectious disease emergencies.

CONCLUSIONS

The multidisciplinary approach, which also included patients' perspective, helped us to protect the consistency and quality of the research provided in pandemic times. The lesson learnt suggest that our research approach may benefit from changes in education, clinical practice and policies.