1
|
O'Donnell A, Anderson P, Schmidt C, Braddick F, Lopez-Pelayo H, Mejía-Trujillo J, Natera G, Arroyo M, Bautista N, Piazza M, Bustamante IV, Kokole D, Jackson K, Jane-Llopis E, Gual A, Schulte B. Tailoring an evidence-based clinical intervention and training package for the treatment and prevention of comorbid heavy drinking and depression in middle-income country settings: the development of the SCALA toolkit in Latin America. Glob Health Action 2022; 15:2080344. [PMID: 35867541 PMCID: PMC9310809 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2080344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective interventions exist for heavy drinking and depression but to date there has been limited translation into routine practice in global health systems. This evidence-to-practice gap is particularly evident in low- and middle-income countries. The international SCALA project (Scale-up of Prevention and Management of Alcohol Use Disorders and Comorbid Depression in Latin America) sought to test the impact of multilevel implementation strategies on rates of primary health care-based measurement of alcohol consumption and identification of depression in Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. OBJECTIVE To describe the process of development and cultural adaptation of the clinical intervention and training package. METHODS We drew on Barrero and Castro's four-stage cultural adaption model: 1) information gathering, 2) preliminary adaption, 3) preliminary adaption tests, and 4) adaption refinement. The Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases checklist helped us identify potential factors that could affect implementation, with local stakeholder groups established to support the tailoring process, as per the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Going to Scale Framework. RESULTS In Stage 1, international best practice guidelines for preventing heavy drinking and depression, and intelligence on the local implementation context, were synthesised to provide an outline clinical intervention and training package. In Stage 2, feedback was gathered from local stakeholders and materials refined accordingly. These materials were piloted with local trainers in Stage 3, leading to further refinements including developing additional tools to support delivery in busy primary care settings. Stage 4 comprised further adaptions in response to real-world implementation, a period that coincided with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, including translating the intervention and training package for online delivery, and higher priority for depression screening in the clinical pathway. CONCLUSION Our experience highlights the importance of meaningful engagement with local communities, alongside the need for continuous tailoring and adaptation, and collaborative decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy O'Donnell
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Peter Anderson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christiane Schmidt
- Centre of Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fleur Braddick
- Addictions Unit, Psychiatry Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hugo Lopez-Pelayo
- Addictions Unit, Psychiatry Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.,Red de Trastornos Adictivos, Instituto Carlos III. Sinesio Delgado, Madrid, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS); Rosselló, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Guillermina Natera
- Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ram´on de la Fuente, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Miriam Arroyo
- Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ram´on de la Fuente, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Natalia Bautista
- Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ram´on de la Fuente, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Marina Piazza
- School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, San Martin de Porres, Peru
| | - Ines V Bustamante
- School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, San Martin de Porres, Peru
| | - Daša Kokole
- Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Katherine Jackson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eva Jane-Llopis
- Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Univ. Ramon Llull, ESADE, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Gual
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS); Rosselló, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bernd Schulte
- Centre of Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Boor C, Molina-Bulla CI, Chiumento A, White RG. Application of the capability approach to Indigenous People's health and well-being: protocol for a mixed-methods scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066738. [PMID: 36600437 PMCID: PMC9772624 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indigenous Peoples are subject to marginalisation, and experience systematic disadvantage in relation to health outcomes. Human development initiatives may help determine whether, and how, Indigenous Peoples are able to be agents of their own development and improve their health and well-being. This scoping review protocol outlines a process for synthesising the existing evidence that has applied the capability approach (CA) to Indigenous People's health and/or well-being. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A mixed-method scoping review is proposed including academic peer-reviewed publications and grey literature. Screening inclusion criteria will include Indigenous populations, using the CA approach to conceptualise health and/or well-being, and be available in English, Spanish, French or Portuguese. Publications that meet these criteria will undergo data extraction. Qualitative and quantitative data will be thematically and descriptively analysed and interpreted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The proposed scoping review does not involve collecting data directly from Indigenous Peoples but will be based on previous research conducted within Indigenous settings. The current protocol and the proposed scoping review incorporate aspects of community involvement to guide the research process.This scoping review constitutes the first phase of a wider participatory action research project conducted with the Indigenous Kankuamo Peoples of Colombia. The findings of this review will be reported to local partners, published in a peer-reviewed journal and an executive summary will be shared with wider stakeholders. Within the wider project, the review will be considered alongside primary data to inform the development of tools/approaches of mental health and well-being for the Kankuamo communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharina van der Boor
- Health Systems Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| | | | - Anna Chiumento
- School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ross G White
- School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iqbal H, West J, Haith-Cooper M, McEachan RRC. A systematic review to identify research priority setting in Black and minority ethnic health and evaluate their processes. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251685. [PMID: 34048459 PMCID: PMC8162667 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities suffer from disproportionately poorer health than the general population. This issue has been recently exemplified by the large numbers of infection rates and deaths caused by covid-19 in BAME populations. Future research has the potential to improve health outcomes for these groups. High quality research priority setting is crucial to effectively consider the needs of the most vulnerable groups of the population. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review is to identify existing research priority studies conducted for BAME health and to determine the extent to which they followed good practice principles for research priority setting. METHOD Included studies were identified by searching Medline, Cinnahl, PsychINFO, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, as well as searches in grey literature. Search terms included "research priority setting", "research prioritisation", "research agenda", "Black and minority ethnic", "ethnic group". Studies were included if they identified or elicited research priorities for BAME health and if they outlined a process of conducting a research prioritisation exercise. A checklist of Nine Common Themes of Good Practice in research priority setting was used as a methodological framework to evaluate the research priority processes of each study. RESULTS Out of 1514 citations initially obtained, 17 studies were included in the final synthesis. Topic areas for their research prioritisation exercise included suicide prevention, knee surgery, mental health, preterm birth, and child obesity. Public and patient involvement was included in eleven studies. Methods of research prioritisation included workshops, Delphi techniques, surveys, focus groups and interviews. The quality of empirical evidence was diverse. None of the exercises followed all good practice principles as outlined in the checklist. Areas that were lacking in particular were: the lack of a comprehensive approach to guide the process; limited use of criteria to guide discussion around priorities; unequal or no representation from ethnic minorities, and poor evaluation of their own processes. CONCLUSIONS Research priority setting practices were found to mostly not follow good practice guidelines which aim to ensure rigour in priority setting activities and support the inclusion of BAME communities in establishing the research agenda. Research is unlikely to deliver useful findings that can support relevant research and positive change for BAME communities unless they fulfil areas of good practice such as inclusivity of key stakeholders' input, planning for implementation of identified priorities, criteria for deciding on priorities, and evaluation of their processes in research priority setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halima Iqbal
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Jane West
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rosemary R. C. McEachan
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pratt B. Sharing power in global health research: an ethical toolkit for designing priority-setting processes that meaningfully include communities. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20:127. [PMID: 34034747 PMCID: PMC8145852 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01453-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
To promote social justice and equity, global health research should meaningfully engage communities throughout projects: from setting agendas onwards. But communities, especially those that are considered disadvantaged or marginalised, rarely have a say in the priorities of the research projects that aim to help them. So far, there remains limited ethical guidance and resources on how to share power with communities in health research priority-setting. This paper presents an "ethical toolkit" for academic researchers and their community partners to use to design priority-setting processes that meaningfully include the communities impacted by their projects. An empirical reflective equilibrium approach was employed to develop the toolkit. Conceptual work articulated ethical considerations related to sharing power in g0l0o0bal health research priority-setting, developed guidance on how to address them, and created an initial version of the toolkit. Empirical work (51 in-depth interviews, 1 focus group, 2 case studies in India and the Philippines) conducted in 2018 and 2019 then tested those findings against information from global health research practice. The final ethical toolkit is a reflective project planning aid. It consists of 4 worksheets (Worksheet 1- Selecting Partners; Worksheet 2- Deciding to Partner; Worksheet 3- Deciding to Engage with the Wider Community; Worksheet 4- Designing Priority-setting) and a Companion Document detailing how to use them. Reflecting on and discussing the questions in Worksheets 1 to 4 before priority-setting will help deliver priority-setting processes that share power with communities and projects with research topics and questions that more accurately reflect their healthcare and system needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Pratt
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pratt B. What are Important Ways of Sharing Power in Health Research Priority Setting? Perspectives From People With Lived Experience and Members of the Public. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2021; 16:200-211. [PMID: 33949222 DOI: 10.1177/15562646211013294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Community engagement (patient and public involvement) is gaining prominence in health research worldwide. But there remains limited ethical guidance on how to share power with communities in health research priority setting, particularly that which has been informed by the perspectives of those being engaged. This article provides initial evidence about what they think are important ways to share power when setting health research projects' topics and questions. Twenty-two people with lived experience, engagement practitioners, and members of the public who have been engaged in health research in the United Kingdom and Australia were interviewed. Thematic analysis identified 15 key ways to share power, many of which are relational. This study further demonstrates that tensions exist between certain ways of sharing power in health research priority setting. More research is needed to determine how to navigate those tensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Pratt
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dowhaniuk N, Ojok S, McKune SL. Setting a research agenda to improve community health: An inclusive mixed-methods approach in Northern Uganda. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0244249. [PMID: 33411706 PMCID: PMC7790286 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals stress the importance of equitable partnerships in research and practice that integrate grass-roots knowledge, leadership, and expertise. However, priorities for health research in low-and-middle income countries are set almost exclusively by external parties and priorities, while end-users remain "researched on" not "researched with". This paper presents the first stage of a Community-Based Participatory Research-inspired project to engage communities and public-health end-users in setting a research agenda to improve health in their community. METHODS Photovoice was used in Kuc, Gulu District, Uganda to engage community members in the selection of a research topic for future public health research and intervention. Alcohol-Use Disorders emerged from this process the health issue that most negatively impacts the community. Following identification of this issue, a cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (n = 327) to triangulate Photovoice findings and to estimate the prevalence of Alcohol-Use Disorders in Kuc. Logistic regression was used to test for associations with demographic characteristics and Alcohol-Use Disorders. RESULTS Photovoice generated four prominent themes, including alcohol related issues, sanitation and compound cleanliness, water quality and access, and infrastructure. Alcohol-Use Disorders were identified by the community as the most important driver of poor health. Survey results indicated that 23.55% of adults in Kuc had a probable Alcohol Use Disorder, 16.45 percentage points higher than World Health Organization estimates for Uganda. CONCLUSIONS Community members engaged in the participatory, bottom-up approach offered by the research team to develop a research agenda to improve health in the community. Participants honed in on the under-researched and underfunded topic of Alcohol-Use Disorders. The findings from Photovoice were validated by survey results, thereby solidifying the high prevalence of Alcohol-Use Disorders as the health outcome that will be targeted through future long-term research and partnership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Dowhaniuk
- Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
- Department of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
- Tropical Conservation and Development Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Susan Ojok
- Uganda Women's Action Program, Gulu, Uganda
| | - Sarah L. McKune
- Department of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
- African Studies Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Krapels J, van der Haar L, Slemming W, de Laat J, Radner J, Sanou AS, Holding P. The Aspirations of Measurement for Change. Front Public Health 2020; 8:568677. [PMID: 33330315 PMCID: PMC7732529 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.568677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This Perspective presents the five key aspirations of an approach to data use, decision making and monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) in Early Childhood Development (ECD) referred to as Measurement for Change. The core ideas of Measurement for Change gave rise to this series, and many of the papers submitted in this series speak to this approach, whether directly or indirectly. The five aspirations describe interconnected concepts that advocate for practitioners and researchers within ECD to build the capacity to use data in their decision making, by establishing a monitoring, evaluation, and learning system that strives to be: Dynamic; Inclusive; Informative; Interactive; and People-centered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lotte van der Haar
- Utrecht Centre for Global Challenges, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wiedaad Slemming
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Joost de Laat
- Utrecht Centre for Global Challenges, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - James Radner
- Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anselme Simeon Sanou
- Department of Public Health, Centre Muraz Biomedical Research Institute, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
| | - Penny Holding
- Saving Brains Collaborative Learning Team, Bromyard, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|