1
|
Speerin R, Needs C, Chua J, Woodhouse LJ, Nordin M, McGlasson R, Briggs AM. Implementing models of care for musculoskeletal conditions in health systems to support value-based care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2020; 34:101548. [PMID: 32723576 PMCID: PMC7382572 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Models of Care (MoCs), and their local Models of Service Delivery, for people with musculoskeletal conditions are becoming an acceptable way of supporting effective implementation of value-based care. MoCs can support the quadruple aim of value-based care through providing people with musculoskeletal disease improved access to health services, better health outcomes and satisfactory experience of their healthcare; ensure the health professionals involved are experiencing satisfaction in delivering such care and health system resources are better utilised. Implementation of MoCs is relevant at the levels of clinical practice (micro), service delivery organisations (meso) and health system (macro) levels. The development, implementation and evaluation of MoCs has evolved over the last decade to more purposively engage people with lived experience of their condition, to operationalise the Chronic Care Model and to employ innovative solutions. This paper explores how MoCs have evolved and are supporting the delivery of value-based care in health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Speerin
- The Sydney University, Level 7, Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, ST LEONARDS, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Christopher Needs
- Department of Rheumatology, Level 4, QEII Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, 59 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Jason Chua
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| | - Linda J Woodhouse
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Rhona McGlasson
- Bone & Joint Canada, P.O. Box 1036, Toronto, ON, M5K 1P2, Canada.
| | - Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chua J, Briggs AM, Hansen P, Chapple C, Abbott JH. Choosing interventions for hip or knee osteoarthritis - What matters to stakeholders? A mixed-methods study. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2020; 2:100062. [PMID: 36474681 PMCID: PMC9718175 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify what factors drive choices among interventions for hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to rank the characteristics of interventions. Methods In this phased, mixed-methods design involving cross-sectoral and multi-disciplinary stakeholders - healthcare consumers, providers, policy-makers, Māori health advocates and OA experts - we used the Nominal Group Technique in focus groups to generate data. We conducted thematic analysis of the focus group data to inform a framework of categories and sub-categories describing factors and characteristics influencing the choice of OA interventions. We then used a dual-panel, two-round e- Delphi survey to verify the framework and rank the characteristics of interventions. Results From six focus groups (n = 38 participants), 364 factors were identified and clustered into 56 themes (mean 9 themes per focus group; range 5-15). Thematic analysis revealed a framework of 3 core categories: characteristics of interventions (10 sub-categories), characteristics of consumers (10 sub-categories) and characteristics of the health system (7 sub-categories). In Delphi round 1, the framework was verified by each of two panels (n = 65, ≥80% acceptability). In round 2, two characteristics of interventions were combined, resulting in 9 characteristics (in decreasing order of importance): effectiveness, appropriateness, quality of the evidence, accessibility, harm, cost, duration, passivity, and immediacy of intervention effect. Conclusion Stakeholders make choices among interventions for hip or knee OA within a framework of characteristics of interventions, of consumers, and of the health system. We identified and ranked 9 key characteristics of interventions that stakeholders consider when choosing or recommending interventions for hip or knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Chua
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Andrew M. Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Australia
| | - Paul Hansen
- Department of Economics, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Cathy Chapple
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - J. Haxby Abbott
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Expósito Tirado JA, Sánchez Navarro C, García Márquez L, García Serrano C, Delgado Mendilivar JM, Molina Crespo I. [Implementation of a new referral model for the musculoskeletal care pathway: Does it improve healthcare outcomes?]. Rehabilitacion (Madr) 2020; 54:173-180. [PMID: 32451069 DOI: 10.1016/j.rh.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of an organisational change in the musculoskeletal referral pathway in our health management area (HMA) by identifying changes in the ability to improve healthcare outcomes by facilitating referral to the most suitable specialty. DESIGN This prospective descriptive study aimed to evaluate referral trends from primary care services (PCS) and hospital care (PHS) to musculoskeletal services from 2012 to 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included all patients who were referred to any of the 3 musculoskeletal services from our HMA catchment area, without specifying sample size. The variables studied were PCS, PHS, service of origin and destination. We used the SPSS programme for the statistical analysis and obtained absolute frequency data. RESULTS The total number of referrals from PCS increased from 25,575 in 2012 to 24,871 in 2018. PHS referrals decreased from 17,207 in 2012 to 9,803 in 2018. With regards to PCS referrals, the service most increasing the number of referrals to the musculoskeletal team was the Rehabilitation Service, from 8.2% in 2012 to 47% in 2018. Regarding PHSs referrals by specialty, the service that most reduced the number of referrals to the musculoskeletal team was the Traumatology Service, from 10,587 in 2012 to 3,911 in 2018. CONCLUSIONS The redesign of the musculoskeletal referral pathway improved healthcare outcomes by improving the quality of the referral process. In this organisational change, the Rehabilitation Service took the leadership from the point of view of healthcare and management of the musculoskeletal process, collaborating in the improvement of the healthcare outcomes of these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Expósito Tirado
- Servicio de Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Área de Gestión Sanitaria Sur de Sevilla, Sevilla, España.
| | - C Sánchez Navarro
- Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Área de Gestión Sanitaria Sur de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
| | - L García Márquez
- Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Área de Gestión Sanitaria Sur de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
| | - C García Serrano
- Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Área de Gestión Sanitaria Sur de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
| | - J M Delgado Mendilivar
- Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Área de Gestión Sanitaria Sur de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
| | - I Molina Crespo
- Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Área de Gestión Sanitaria Sur de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tatangelo G, Watts J, Lim K, Connaughton C, Abimanyi-Ochom J, Borgström F, Nicholson GC, Shore-Lorenti C, Stuart AL, Iuliano-Burns S, Seeman E, Prince R, March L, Cross M, Winzenberg T, Laslett LL, Duque G, Ebeling PR, Sanders KM. The Cost of Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, and Associated Fractures in Australia in 2017. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34:616-625. [PMID: 30615801 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis and osteopenia are increasingly prevalent conditions among older adults. Not only do the fractures associated with poor bone health have significant health consequences for the individual, but also their economic impact is placing increasing financial burden on governments and society. This study aimed to determine the direct economic cost of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fractures among Australians aged 50 years and older in 2017. This study uses previous Australian data on the incidence and prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia together with recent Australian data on health service utilization after fracture to provide an estimate of the economic burden of osteoporosis. A bottom-up costing approach was used to determine the average direct health care and non-health care total costs of a fracture, as well as the average community health service costs of managing individuals with osteoporosis or osteopenia. The total direct cost of osteoporosis in Australia in 2017 was estimated to be $3.44 billion (AUD 2017, USD 2.77 billion). Treatment of fractures accounted for 68% of total direct costs, and non-fracture management of osteoporosis accounted for 32%. Hip fractures accounted for the highest proportion (43%) of the total direct cost of fractures, although fractures at "other" sites accounted for 38.5%. Fractures among individuals aged 70 years and older accounted for 74% of the direct costs (55% and 19% in women and men, respectively). Fracture costs in those with osteopenia accounted for 50% of direct fracture treatment costs. This up-to-date cost analysis estimated that costs in 2017 were three times higher than in 2007. These estimates will aid clinicians, policy makers, researchers, and health care organizations to acknowledge the economic importance of reducing osteoporosis-related fractures and associated costs. This provides a strong public health case to promote bone health that will assist in reducing future fracture-related costs. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Watts
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Karen Lim
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catherine Connaughton
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julie Abimanyi-Ochom
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Geoff C Nicholson
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne and Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Rural Clinical School, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
| | - Catherine Shore-Lorenti
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne and Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Sandra Iuliano-Burns
- Department of Medicine, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ego Seeman
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard Prince
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Australia, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Lyn March
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney-Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marita Cross
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney-Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tania Winzenberg
- Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Laura L Laslett
- Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Gustavo Duque
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne and Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Ageing Bone Research Program, Sydney Medical School, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter R Ebeling
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne and Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kerrie M Sanders
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne and Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chou L, Ranger TA, Peiris W, Cicuttini FM, Urquhart DM, Sullivan K, Seneviwickrama M, Briggs AM, Wluka AE. Patients' perceived needs for medical services for non-specific low back pain: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204885. [PMID: 30408039 PMCID: PMC6224057 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An improved understanding of patients' perceived needs for medical services for low back pain (LBP) will enable healthcare providers to better align service provision with patient expectations, thus improving patient and health care system outcomes. Thus, we aimed to identify the existing literature regarding patients' perceived needs for medical services for LBP. METHODS A systematic scoping review was performed of publications identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO (1990-2016). Descriptive data regarding each study, its design and methodology were extracted and risk of bias assessed. Aggregates of patients' perceived needs for medical services for LBP were categorised. RESULTS 50 studies (35 qualitative, 14 quantitative and 1 mixed-methods study) from 1829 were relevant. Four areas of perceived need emerged: (1) Patients with LBP sought healthcare from medical practitioners to obtain a diagnosis, receive management options, sickness certification and legitimation for their LBP. However, there was dissatisfaction with the cursory and superficial approach of care. (2) Patients had concerns about pharmacotherapy, with few studies reporting on patients' preferences for medications. (3) Of the few studies which examined the patients' perceived need of invasive therapies, these found that patients avoided injections and surgeries (4) Patients desired spinal imaging for diagnostic purposes and legitimation of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Across many different patient populations with data obtained from a variety of study designs, common themes emerged which highlighted areas of patient dissatisfaction with the medical management of LBP, in particular, the superficial approach to care perceived by patients and concerns regarding pharmacotherapy. Patients perceive unmet needs from medical services, including the need to obtain a diagnosis, the desire for pain control and the preference for spinal imaging. These issues need to be considered in developing approaches for the management of LBP in order to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tom A. Ranger
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Waruna Peiris
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Flavia M. Cicuttini
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Donna M. Urquhart
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kaye Sullivan
- Monash University Library, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maheeka Seneviwickrama
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew M. Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- MOVE: muscle, bone & joint health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anita E. Wluka
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Inderjeeth CA, Raymond WD, Briggs AM, Geelhoed E, Oldham D, Mountain D. Implementation of the Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care: a fracture liaison service utilising emergency department information systems to identify patients with fragility fracture to improve current practice and reduce re-fracture rates: a 12-month analysis. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:1759-1770. [PMID: 29704027 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4526-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Fracture liaison service linked to an emergency department database effectively identifies patients with OP, improves best practice care, reduces recurrent fractures, and improves quality of life (QoL). The next step is to establish cost-effectiveness. This should be seen as the standard model of care. INTRODUCTION The Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care recommends implementation of a fracture liaison service (FLS) to manage patients with minimal trauma fractures (MTFs). This study evaluates the efficacy of a FLS linked to a tertiary hospital emergency department information system (EDIS) in reducing recurrent fractures. METHODS Patients aged ≥ 50 years with MTF identified from EDIS were invited to the FLS. Patient outcomes were compared to routine care (retrospective group-same hospital, and prospective group-other hospital) at 3- and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS Two hundred forty-one of 376 (64.1%) eligible patients participated in the FLS with 12 months of follow-up. Absolute risk of recurrent MTF at 12 months was reduced by 9.2 and 10.2% compared with the prospective and retrospective controls, respectively. After age/sex adjustment, FLS participants had less MTF at 12 months vs. the retrospective controls, OR 0.38 (95%CI 0.18-0.79), but not the prospective controls, OR 0.40 (95%CI 0.16-1.01). FLS patients were more likely to receive the 'best practice' care, i.e. awareness of osteoporosis, investigations, and treatment (all p < 0.05). 'Fallers' (OR 0.48 (95%CI 0.24, 0.96)) and fall rates were lower in the FLS (p = 0.001) compared to the prospective control. FLS experienced the largest improvement in QoL from 3 to 12 months as measured by the EuroQoL 5-domain (EQ-5D) UK weighted score (+ 15 vs. - 11 vs. - 16%, p < 0.001) and EQ-5D Health State visual analogue scale (+ 29 vs. - 2 vs. + 1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients managed in a linked EDIS-FLS were more likely to receive the 'best practice' care and had lower recurrent MTF and improved QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Inderjeeth
- Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Perth, Australia.
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
- Arthritis and Osteoporosis Foundation of Western Australia, Shenton Park, Australia.
| | - W D Raymond
- Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Perth, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
| | - E Geelhoed
- School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - D Oldham
- Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Perth, Australia
| | - D Mountain
- Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Perth, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hunter DJ, Hinman RS, Bowden JL, Egerton T, Briggs AM, Bunker SJ, Kasza J, Forbes AB, French SD, Pirotta M, Schofield DJ, Zwar NA, Bennell KL. Effectiveness of a new model of primary care management on knee pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Protocol for THE PARTNER STUDY. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19:132. [PMID: 29712564 PMCID: PMC5928565 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2048-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To increase the uptake of key clinical recommendations for non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and improve patient outcomes, we developed a new model of service delivery (PARTNER model) and an intervention to implement the model in the Australian primary care setting. We will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this model compared to usual general practice care. METHODS We will conduct a mixed-methods study, including a two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial, with quantitative, qualitative and economic evaluations. We will recruit 44 general practices and 572 patients with knee OA in urban and regional practices in Victoria and New South Wales. The interventions will target both general practitioners (GPs) and their patients at the practice level. Practices will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio. Patients will be recruited if they are aged ≥45 years and have experienced knee pain ≥4/10 on a numerical rating scale for more than three months. Outcomes are self-reported, patient-level validated measures with the primary outcomes being change in pain and function at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 and 12 months. The implementation intervention will support and provide education to intervention group GPs to deliver effective management for patients with knee OA using tailored online training and electronic medical record support. Participants with knee OA will have an initial GP visit to confirm their diagnosis and receive management according to GP intervention or control group allocation. As part of the intervention group GP management, participants with knee OA will be referred to a centralised multidisciplinary service: the PARTNER Care Support Team (CST). The CST will be trained in behaviour change support and evidence-based knee OA management. They will work with patients to develop a collaborative action plan focussed on key self-management behaviours, and communicate with the patients' GPs. Patients receiving care by intervention group GPs will receive tailored OA educational materials, a leg muscle strengthening program, and access to a weight-loss program as appropriate and agreed. GPs in the control group will receive no additional training and their patients will receive usual care. DISCUSSION This project aims to address a major evidence-to-practice gap in primary care management of OA by evaluating a new service delivery model implemented with an intervention targeting GP practice behaviours to improve the health of people with knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617001595303 , date of registration 1/12/2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Rana S. Hinman
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Jocelyn L. Bowden
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Thorlene Egerton
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Andrew M. Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Stephen J. Bunker
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Jessica Kasza
- Biostatistics Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Andrew B. Forbes
- Biostatistics Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Simon D. French
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario Canada
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Marie Pirotta
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Deborah J. Schofield
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Nicholas A. Zwar
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia
| | - Kim L. Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Assessing Implementation Readiness and Success of an e-Resource to Improve Prelicensure Physical Therapy Workforce Capacity to Manage Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47:652-663. [PMID: 28859591 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Study Design Prospective within-subject, cross-sectional, between-group, nested qualitative designs within an implementation science framework. Background Physical therapy is recommended for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care, yet prelicensure RA curriculum time remains limited. Objectives To determine readiness for, and success of, implementing an e-learning tool, Rheumatoid Arthritis for Physiotherapists e-Learning (RAP-eL), within the prelicensure physical therapy curriculum. Methods All physical therapy students in a 1-year cohort in 2014 had RAP-eL embedded in their curriculum. Rheumatoid Arthritis for Physiotherapists e-Learning is an online platform that delivers RA disease information with translation to clinical practice. Implementation readiness, determined by acceptability of RAP-eL to students, was evaluated using focus groups (n = 23). Implementation success was measured using quantitative data from a previously validated questionnaire, including changes in students' self-reported confidence in knowledge (out of 45) and skills (out of 40) in managing RA after 4 weeks of access to RAP-eL, retention of learning over 14 months, and differences in workforce readiness between students in the cohort who had access to RAP-eL and a historical control cohort. Results Acceptability of RAP-eL was confirmed from qualitative data, demonstrating implementation readiness. Short-term improvements were observed in RA knowledge (mean difference, 16.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.7, 17.6) and RA skills (mean difference, 14.9; 95% CI: 13.9, 15.9; n = 137). Retention was demonstrated after 14 months (P<.001; n = 62). Students in the 1-year cohort who had RAP-eL embedded in the curriculum scored significantly higher on knowledge (mean difference, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.3, 5.9) and skills (mean difference, 3.3; 95% CI: 0.9, 5.7; n = 62) compared to those without RAP-eL (n = 36). Rheumatoid Arthritis for Physiotherapists e-Learning remains embedded in the curriculum. Conclusion This study demonstrated both readiness and success of the sustainable implementation of RAP-eL within a prelicensure physical therapy curriculum. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(9):652-663. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7281.
Collapse
|
9
|
Briggs AM, Jordan JE, Jennings M, Speerin R, Bragge P, Chua J, Woolf AD, Slater H. Supporting the Evaluation and Implementation of Musculoskeletal Models of Care: A Globally Informed Framework for Judging Readiness and Success. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 69:567-577. [PMID: 27273891 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Revised: 04/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a globally informed framework to evaluate readiness for implementation and success after implementation of musculoskeletal models of care (MOCs). METHODS Three phases were undertaken: 1) a qualitative study with 27 Australian subject matter experts (SMEs) to develop a draft framework; 2) an eDelphi study with an international panel of 93 SMEs across 30 nations to evaluate face validity, and refine and establish consensus on the framework components; and 3) translation of the framework into a user-focused resource and evaluation of its acceptability with the eDelphi panel. RESULTS A comprehensive evaluation framework was developed for judging the readiness and success of musculoskeletal MOCs. The framework consists of 9 domains, with each domain containing a number of themes underpinned by detailed elements. In the first Delphi round, scores of "partly agree" or "completely agree" with the draft framework ranged 96.7%-100%. In the second round, "essential" scores ranged 58.6%-98.9%, resulting in 14 of 34 themes being classified as essential. SMEs strongly agreed or agreed that the final framework was useful (98.8%), usable (95.1%), credible (100%) and appealing (93.9%). Overall, 96.3% strongly supported or supported the final structure of the framework as it was presented, while 100%, 96.3%, and 100% strongly supported or supported the content within the readiness, initiating implementation, and success streams, respectively. CONCLUSION An empirically derived framework to evaluate the readiness and success of musculoskeletal MOCs was strongly supported by an international panel of SMEs. The framework provides an important internationally applicable benchmark for the development, implementation, and evaluation of musculoskeletal MOCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Matthew Jennings
- New South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia, and Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Speerin
- New South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Bragge
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason Chua
- Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, and Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Helen Slater
- Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Skela-Savič B, Pesjak K, Hvalič-Touzery S. Low back pain among nurses in Slovenian hospitals: cross-sectional study. Int Nurs Rev 2017; 64:544-551. [PMID: 28444732 DOI: 10.1111/inr.12376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
AIM The study investigated the prevalence and factors predicting low back pain among nurses in Slovenian hospitals. BACKGROUND The risk factors for low back pain are physical and psychosocial. Implementation of interventions for reducing low back pain calls for management support, accessible equipment, education, knowledge and risk assessment. INTRODUCTION Low back pain prevalence and incidence among healthcare workers is very high compared to the general population and is a strong risk factor for long-term sickness absence. METHODS A cross-sectional study design was utilized. We used validated instruments: Nordic Musculoskeletal Disorder Questionnaire, Stanford Presenteeism Scale and Perceived Stress Scale. The sample included 1744 nursing employees from 16 Slovenian hospitals, ranging from practical nurses, registered nurses, nurses with a bachelor's degree and those with a master's degree. FINDINGS Results revealed a prevalence of low back pain among 85.9% of respondents. Relevant risk factors included female gender, age, length of employment, years in current position, shift work and the number of nurses per shift. In the regression model, factors predicting low back pain included presenteeism with a negative effect on work, presenteeism and maintaining work productivity, inability to control daily life, number of nurses per shift and respondents' age. CONCLUSIONS Future activities should be oriented towards eliminating or reducing risks for low back pain incidents and towards different strategies, guidelines and actions which empower individuals and provide knowledge to manage and prevent low back pain. IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH POLICY Slovenian healthcare system planning needs a national strategy to successfully promote LBP preventive and controlling strategies. Management can plan preventive and curative measures to reduce low back pain prevalence among nursing personnel. Management should also implement policies reflecting research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Skela-Savič
- Fakulteta za zdravstvo Angele Boškin/Angela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, Jesenice, Slovenia
| | - K Pesjak
- Fakulteta za zdravstvo Angele Boškin/Angela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, Jesenice, Slovenia
| | - S Hvalič-Touzery
- Fakulteta za zdravstvo Angele Boškin/Angela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, Jesenice, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Briggs AM, Cross MJ, Hoy DG, Sànchez-Riera L, Blyth FM, Woolf AD, March L. Musculoskeletal Health Conditions Represent a Global Threat to Healthy Aging: A Report for the 2015 World Health Organization World Report on Ageing and Health. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2017; 56 Suppl 2:S243-55. [PMID: 26994264 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnw002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 377] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Persistent pain, impaired mobility and function, and reduced quality of life and mental well-being are the most common experiences associated with musculoskeletal conditions, of which there are more than 150 types. The prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal conditions increase with aging. A profound burden of musculoskeletal disease exists in developed and developing nations. Notably, this burden far exceeds service capacity. Population growth, aging, and sedentary lifestyles, particularly in developing countries, will create a crisis for population health that requires a multisystem response with musculoskeletal health services as a critical component. Globally, there is an emphasis on maintaining an active lifestyle to reduce the impacts of obesity, cardiovascular conditions, cancer, osteoporosis, and diabetes in older people. Painful musculoskeletal conditions, however, profoundly limit the ability of people to make these lifestyle changes. A strong relationship exists between painful musculoskeletal conditions and a reduced capacity to engage in physical activity resulting in functional decline, frailty, reduced well-being, and loss of independence. Multilevel strategies and approaches to care that adopt a whole person approach are needed to address the impact of impaired musculoskeletal health and its sequelae. Effective strategies are available to address the impact of musculoskeletal conditions; some are of low cost (e.g., primary care-based interventions) but others are expensive and, as such, are usually only feasible for developed nations. In developing nations, it is crucial that any reform or development initiatives, including research, must adhere to the principles of development effectiveness to avoid doing harm to the health systems in these settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. Arthritis and Osteoporosis Victoria, Caulfield South, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Marita J Cross
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital Department of Rheumatology, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Damian G Hoy
- School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Australia. Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Public Health Division, Noumea, New Caledonia
| | - Lídia Sànchez-Riera
- Institut d'Investigació, Biomèdica de Bellvitge, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Department Reumatologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fiona M Blyth
- Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney and Ageing and Alzheimer's Institute, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony D Woolf
- Bone and Joint Research Office, The Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
| | - Lyn March
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital Department of Rheumatology, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Demonstrating and improving value of care continues to be increasingly important in hand surgery. To prepare for emerging models that transition payment from volume to value, hand surgeons will benefit from a clear understanding of quality, cost, and value. National organizations and both public and private payers increasingly advocate for patient-reported outcome measures for pay for reporting and pay for performance initiatives. These are intended to incentivize providers and health systems to improve patient-centered care while minimizing costs. Appreciating the limitations to using patient-reported outcomes in hand surgery can ensure hand surgery is appropriately assessed in novel payment models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin N Kamal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Models of Care for musculoskeletal health: Moving towards meaningful implementation and evaluation across conditions and care settings. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2016; 30:359-374. [DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2016.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
14
|
Dziedzic KS, French S, Davis AM, Geelhoed E, Porcheret M. Implementation of musculoskeletal Models of Care in primary care settings: Theory, practice, evaluation and outcomes for musculoskeletal health in high-income economies. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2016; 30:375-397. [DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2016.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Revised: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
15
|
Walsh L, Hill S, Wluka AE, Brooks P, Buchbinder R, Cahill A, Dans LF, Lowe D, Taylor M, Tugwell P. Harnessing and supporting consumer involvement in the development and implementation of Models of Care for musculoskeletal health. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2016; 30:420-444. [DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2016.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
16
|
Gardner P, Slater H, Jordan JE, Fary RE, Chua J, Briggs AM. Physiotherapy students' perspectives of online e-learning for interdisciplinary management of chronic health conditions: a qualitative study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2016; 16:62. [PMID: 26879982 PMCID: PMC4754862 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0593-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2016] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To qualitatively explore physiotherapy students' perceptions of online e-learning for chronic disease management using a previously developed, innovative and interactive, evidence-based, e-learning package: Rheumatoid Arthritis for Physiotherapists e-Learning (RAP-eL). METHODS Physiotherapy students participated in three focus groups in Perth, Western Australia. Purposive sampling was employed to ensure maximum heterogeneity across age, gender and educational background. To explore students' perspectives on the advantages and disadvantages of online e-learning, ways to enhance e-learning, and information/learning gaps in relation to interdisciplinary management of chronic health conditions, a semi-structured interview schedule was developed. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using inductive methods within a grounded theory approach to derive key themes. RESULTS Twenty-three students (78 % female; 39 % with previous tertiary qualification) of mean (SD) age 23 (3.6) years participated. Students expressed a preference for a combination of both online e-learning and lecture-style learning formats for chronic disease management, citing flexibility to work at one's own pace and time, and access to comprehensive information as advantages of e-learning learning. Personal interaction and ability to clarify information immediately were considered advantages of lecture-style formats. Perceived knowledge gaps included practical application of interdisciplinary approaches to chronic disease management and developing and implementing physiotherapy management plans for people with chronic health conditions. CONCLUSIONS Physiotherapy students preferred multi-modal and blended formats for learning about chronic disease management. This study highlights the need for further development of practically-oriented knowledge and skills related to interdisciplinary care for people with chronic conditions among physiotherapy students. While RAP-eL focuses on rheumatoid arthritis, the principles of learning apply to the broader context of chronic disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Gardner
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| | - Helen Slater
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| | - Joanne E Jordan
- HealthSense (Aust) Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, VIC, 3204, Australia.
| | - Robyn E Fary
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| | - Jason Chua
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
- Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, PO Box 8172, Perth Business Centre, Perth, WA, 6849, Australia.
| | - Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
- Arthritis and Osteoporosis Victoria, PO Box 130, Caulfield South, VIC, 3162, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|