Risk of falling among hospitalized patients with high modified Morse scores could be further Stratified

Fall Risk in Adult Family Practice Non-Attenders: A Cross-Sectional Study from Slovenia

Introduction

Not much is known about the fall risk among the adult population of those who rarely visit doctors. We wanted to determine the prevalence of increased fall risk in a population of family practice non-attenders and the factors associated with it.

Methods

We included participants from family medicine practices in this cross-sectional study. To be included in the study, the participants had to be adults living in the community (home-dwelling people) who had not visited their chosen family physician in the last five years (non-attenders). The identification of the eligible persons was done through a search of electronic medical records, which yield 2,025 non-attenders. Community nurses collected data in the participants’ homes. The outcome measure was increased fall risk as assessed by the Morse fall scale: increased risk (≥25) vs. no risk.

Results

The sample consisted of 1,945 patients (96.0% response rate) with a mean age of 60.4 years (range 20.5 to 99.7 years). An increased fall risk was determined in 482 or 24.8% (95% CI: [22.9, 26.8]) of the patients. The multivariate model showed a significant association of increased fall risk with higher age (p<0.001), lower systolic blood pressure (p=0.047), poor family function (p=0.016), increased risk of malnutrition (p=0.013), higher number of chronic diseases (p=0.027), higher pain intensity (p<0.001), lower self-assessment of current health (p=0.002), and higher dependence in daily activities (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Non-attenders may have an increased risk of falling which depends on their health status and age. The inclusion of community nurses in primary healthcare teams could be of use not only to identify the non-attenders’ health needs, but also to better manage their health, especially the factors that were identified to be associated with greater fall risk.

Falls in oldest-old adults hospitalized in acute geriatric ward

PURPOSE

The study aims to identify risk factors for falling among acutely ill older patients, hospitalized in acute geriatric ward.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 260 cases of patients who had fallen and 439 controls was conducted in a geriatric ward. We retrieved from the electronic hospital records data including patient demographics, medical diagnoses, and laboratory results, and drugs taken prior to the fall were reviewed. In addition, data on functional and cognitive status were recorded. Admission Morse Falls Scale for every patient was also retrieved.

RESULTS

The following on-admission diagnoses were associated with a higher incidence of falls during hospitalization: hypertension (84% vs. 38%), congestive heart failure (CHF), 74% vs 16%, dementia (36% vs. 5%), and delirium (36% vs 5%). A higher percentage of fallers compared to controls consumed beta blockers (69% vs. 53%), benzodiazepines (46% vs. 32%), antidepressants (33% vs. 23%), oral diabetes drugs (20% vs. 11%) and opiates (8% vs. 4%). On-admission Morse Falls Scale score was found to be higher in the patients who fell (59 vs.53). The strongest predictors of falling during hospitalization were CHF, hypertension, dementia, delirium, assisted mobility and dependence.

CONCLUSION

A systematic screening of risk factors for falls and identification of them might contribute to reducing the risk associated with falls during hospitalization.

Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice

(1) Background: The use of standardized tools is regarded as the basis for an evidence-based assessment. The tools enable monitoring of complex events and the effectiveness of adopted interventions. Some healthcare facilities use standardized tools such as the Morse Fall Scale, but many use non-standardized tools created based on patient needs. Our study question was, why are non-standardized tools used when standardized tools are more beneficial and can be statistically evaluated and compared to other results; (2) Methods: We used a quantitative, non-standardized questionnaire to survey 1200 nurses, which was representative sample for the entire Czech Republic. All questionnaires were assessed in two phases (a) the frequency evaluation and descriptive analysis, and (b) hypotheses testing and correlation analyses; (3) Results: We found that the Conley Scale, Barthel test, and IADL test were preferred by many nurses. Furthermore, we found that nurses using standardized assessment scales noticed risk factors significantly more frequently but regarded the increased complexity of care to be psychologically demanding. (4) Conclusions: In patients with physical disabilities, both types of tools (internal non-standardized and standardized) are used to assess the risk of falls and independence; nurses generally welcomed the increase use of standardized tools in their facilities.

Comparison of two fall-risk assessment tools used in a long-term care facility

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to compare the ability of the Morse Fall Scale (MFS) and Farmer's fall-risk assessment tool (FFAT) to identify correlations between risk factors and falls among older adult long-term care (LTC) facility residents.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

This was a correlational retrospective study. 200 medical records of older adults hospitalized in a LTC facility in central Israel, from January 2017 to January 2018, were examined.

FINDINGS

Of all the residents, 75% and 99.5% of the residents were identified as having a high fall risk according to the MFS and FFAT, respectively. Only 12.5% of residents actually fell. MFS score was weakly correlated with actual falls (odds ratio = 1.035). It was also found that all fallers fell during their first week at the facility.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS

Future research should explore the ability of the tools to capture changes in the fall risk by repeat assessments, as this has not been examined in the present study.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The MFS and FFAT tool may have little value in assessing fall risk in older adult LTC facility residents. Therefore, nurses should perform a clinical evaluation of each individual patient. In addition, nurses should place a particular emphasis on fall risk and prevention during the first week following admission.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE

The findings of the present study raise doubts regarding the utility of the common practice of assessing fall risk in older adult LTC facility residents using the tools MFS and the FFAT, thus emphasizing the need to adopt a different approach.

Impact of Hearing Loss on Patient Falls in the Inpatient Setting

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this study were to investigate an association between the risk of patient falls and self-reported hearing loss and to examine whether self-reported hearing loss with versus without hearing aids predicts patient falls in an inpatient setting.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted in 2018 in a large, urban, academic medical center. Participants included unique inpatients (N=52,805) of adults aged >18 years between February 1, 2017, and February 1, 2018. Outcome measures were falls in the inpatient setting and hearing loss with versus without hearing aids as predictors for patient falls.

RESULTS

Self-reported hearing loss was associated with falls in the inpatient setting (OR=1.74, 95% CI=1.46, 2.07, p<1.43 × 10^-9). Among patients with hearing impairment, a lack of hearing aids increased the risk for falls in the inpatient setting (OR=2.70, 95% CI=1.64, 4.69, p<1.41 × 10^-5). After accounting for the risk of fall using the Morse Fall Scale (which does not include hearing impairment) and controlling for age and sex, patients with hearing loss and no hearing aids were significantly more likely to fall (OR=2.44, 95% CI=1.002, 5.654, p<0.042), but patients with hearing loss who did have hearing aids were not significantly more likely to fall (p<0.889). Hearing loss together with the Morse Fall Scale better predicted falls than the Morse Fall Scale alone (p<0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In the inpatient setting, there was a positive association between hearing loss and falls. However, among patients with hearing loss, only those without hearing aids were significantly more likely to fall, accounting for the Morse Fall Scale score and demographics characteristics. These findings support adding hearing loss as a modifiable risk factor in risk assessment tools for falls and exploring the use of amplification devices as an intervention.

The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance in healthy young and older adults: A systematic review of the literature

Various studies have investigated the effect of noninvasive brain stimulation methods such as transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) on postural control in healthy young and older adults. However, the use of different treatment protocols and outcome measures makes it difficult to interpret the research results. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the current literature on the effect of tDCS on postural control. Nine databases were searched for papers assessing the effect of tDCS on postural control in young healthy and/or older adults. The data of included studies were extracted and methodological quality examined using PEDro. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) of primary motor cortex may improve dynamic balance in young healthy individuals. In older adults, a-tDCS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cerebellum showed a positive effect on dual task and dynamic balance, respectively. In conclusion, tDCS may improve both static and dynamic balance in younger and older adults. However, due to lack of consensus in the results, caution is required when drawing conclusions with regards to these findings.

Fatores de risco associados à queda em pacientes internados na clínica médica-cirúrgica

Resumo Objetivo Identificar os fatores de risco associados à quedas em pacientes internados na clínica médica-cirúrgica. Métodos Estudo analítico e descritivo com abordagem quantitativa realizado de junho a setembro de 2017 em hospital público de grande porte da região norte do estado do Ceará-Brasil. A amostra foi de 155 pacientes e a coleta ocorreu por meio de instrumento estruturado dividido em cinco partes: a) Dados Clínico-Epidemiológicos; b) Aplicação do Mini-mental; c) Aplicação da Escala de queda de Morse; d) Aplicação do índice de Katz; e) Diagnóstico de Enfermagem “Risco de Quedas”. Para análise estatística, foi considerado erro amostral de 5%. Resultados Dos 155 pacientes, 41,2% (64) possuíam diagnóstico clínico e 58,8% (91) eram pacientes traumatológicos. Foi identificado correlação estatisticamente para ocorrência de quedas entre dias de internamento (p=0,07), Mini exame mental (p=0,048) e Katz (p=0,017) para os pacientes clínicos enquanto que os pacientes traumatológicos apresentam associação positiva para ocorrência de quedas nas variáveis idade (p=0,028) e Katz (p=0,037). Conclusão Os principais fatores de risco identificados foram: uso de dispositivos auxiliares, história de quedas, estar em pós-operatório, dificuldade na marcha, força diminuída nas extremidades, equilíbrio prejudicado, mobilidade física prejudicada, cenário pouco conhecido e material antiderrapante insuficiente no banheiro.

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on balance improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic tool to improve balance and optimize rehabilitation strategies. However, current literature shows the methodological heterogeneity of tDCS protocols and results, hindering any clear conclusions about the effects of tDCS on postural control. Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS on postural control, and identify the most beneficial target brain areas and the effect on different populations. Methods: Two independent reviewers selected randomized tDCS clinical-trials studies from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and reference lists of retrieved articles published between 1998 and 2017. Most frequently reported centre of pressure (COP) variables were selected for meta-analysis. Other postural control outcomes were discussed in the review. Results: Thirty studies were included in the systematic review, and 11 were submitted to a meta-analysis. A reduction of COP displacement area has been significantly achieved by tDCS, evidencing an improvement in balance control. Individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) and healthy young adults are mostly affected by stimulation. The analysis of the impact of tDCS over different brain areas revealed a significant effect after primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation, however, with no clear results after cerebellar stimulation due to divergent results among studies. Conclusions: tDCS appears to improve balance control, more evident in healthy and CP subjects. Effects are observed when primary MI is stimulated. Cerebellar stimulation should be better investigated.