1
|
Ares-Blanco S, López-Rodríguez JA, Polentinos-Castro E, Del Cura-González I. Effect of GP visits in the compliance of preventive services: a cross-sectional study in Europe. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:165. [PMID: 38750446 PMCID: PMC11094967 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02400-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performing cardiovascular and cancer screenings in target populations can reduce mortality. Visiting a General Practitioner (GP) once a year is related to an increased likelihood of preventive care. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of visiting a GP in the last year on the delivery of preventive services based on sex and household income. METHODS Cross-sectional study using data collected from the European Health Interview Survey 2013-2015 of individuals aged 40-74 years from 29 European countries. The variables included: sociodemographic factors (age, sex, and household income (HHI) quintiles [HHI 1: lowest income, HHI 5: more affluent]), lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and preventive care services (cardiometabolic, influenza vaccination, and cancer screening). Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and multilevel models (level 1: citizen, level 2: country) were performed. RESULTS 242,212 subjects were included, 53.7% were female. The proportion of subjects who received any cardiometabolic screening (92.4%) was greater than cancer screening (colorectal cancer: 44.1%, gynaecologic cancer: 40.0%) and influenza vaccination. Individuals who visited a GP in the last year were more prone to receive preventive care services (cardiometabolic screening: adjusted OR (aOR): 7.78, 95% CI: 7.43-8.15; colorectal screening aOR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.80-1.95; mammography aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.69-1.83 and Pap smear test: aOR: 1.89, 95% CI:1.85-1.94). Among those who visited a GP in the last year, the highest ratios of cardiometabolic screening and cancer screening benefited those who were more affluent. Women underwent more blood pressure measurements than men regardless of the HHI. Men were more likely to undergo influenza vaccination than women regardless of the HHI. The highest differences between countries were observed for influenza vaccination, with a median odds ratio (MOR) of 6.36 (under 65 years with comorbidities) and 4.30 (over 65 years with comorbidities), followed by colorectal cancer screening with an MOR of 2.26. CONCLUSIONS Greater adherence to preventive services was linked to individuals who had visited a GP at least once in the past year. Disparities were evident among those with lower household incomes who visited a GP. The most significant variability among countries was observed in influenza vaccination and colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ares-Blanco
- Federica Montseny Health Centre, Gerencia Asistencial Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain.
- Medical Specialties and Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
- Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion Networks (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Juan A López-Rodríguez
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- General Ricardos Health Centre, Gerencia Asistencial Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Primary Care Research Unit, Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion Networks (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
- Medical Specialties and Public Health Department, School of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos, University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Polentinos-Castro
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Primary Care Research Unit, Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion Networks (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
- Medical Specialties and Public Health Department, School of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos, University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Del Cura-González
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Primary Care Research Unit, Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion Networks (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
- Medical Specialties and Public Health Department, School of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos, University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
- Aging Research Center, Karolinksa Instituted, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Su M, Zhang T, Zhang W, Li Z, Fan X. Decomposition analysis on the equity of health examination utilization for the middle-aged and elderly people in China: based on longitudinal CHARLS data from 2011 to 2018. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:998. [PMID: 38600464 PMCID: PMC11312603 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18068-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the utilization rate and equity of health examination service among the middle-aged and elderly population in China from 2011 to 2018. The contribution of various determinants to the inequity in health examination service utilization was also examined. METHODS Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS) were analyzed to assess the health examination service utilization rate among the middle-aged and elderly population. A concentration curve and concentration index were employed to measure the equity of health examination service utilization and decomposed into its determining factors. Horizontal inequity index was applied to evaluate the trends in equity of health examination service. RESULTS The health examination service utilization rates among the middle-aged and elderly population were 29.45%, 20.69%, 25.40%, and 32.05% in 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018, respectively. The concentration indexes for health examination service utilization were 0.0080 (95% CI: - 0.0084, 0.0244), 0.0155 (95% CI: - 0.0054, 0.0363), 0.0095 (95% CI: - 0.0088, 0.0277), and - 0.0100 (95% CI: - 0.0254, 0.0054) from 2011 to 2018, respectively. The horizontal inequity index was positive from 2011 to 2018, evidencing a pro-rich inequity trend. Age, residence, education, region, and economic status were the major identified contributors influencing the equity of health examination service utilization. CONCLUSIONS A pro-rich inequity existed in health examination service utilization among the middle-aged and elderly population in China. Reducing the wealth and regional gap, providing equal educational opportunities, and strengthening the capacity for chronic disease prevention and control are crucial for reducing the inequity in health examination service utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Su
- School of Public Administration, Inner Mongolia University, Yuquan District, Zhaojun Road, Hohhot, 010070, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Tianjiao Zhang
- School of Public Administration, Inner Mongolia University, Yuquan District, Zhaojun Road, Hohhot, 010070, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Weile Zhang
- School of Public Administration, Inner Mongolia University, Yuquan District, Zhaojun Road, Hohhot, 010070, Inner Mongolia, China.
| | - Zhengrong Li
- School of Public Administration, Inner Mongolia University, Yuquan District, Zhaojun Road, Hohhot, 010070, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Xiaojing Fan
- School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 28 Xianning West Road, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jain V, Sinha S, Shaw C, Bramham K, Croucher C. Re-evaluating national screening for chronic kidney disease in the UK. BMJ 2023; 382:e074265. [PMID: 37524389 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vageesh Jain
- Specialised Commissioning Team for London, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Smeeta Sinha
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Renal Department, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK
| | - Catriona Shaw
- Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kate Bramham
- Department of Renal Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duddy C, Gadsby E, Hibberd V, Krska J, Wong G. What happens after an NHS Health Check? A survey and realist review. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2023; 11:1-133. [PMID: 37830173 DOI: 10.3310/rgth4127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Background The National Health Service Health Check in England aims to provide adults aged 40 to 74 with an assessment of their risk of developing cardiovascular disease and to offer advice to help manage and reduce this risk. The programme is commissioned by local authorities and delivered by a range of providers in different settings, although primarily in general practices. This project focused on variation in the advice, onward referrals and prescriptions offered to attendees following their health check. Objectives (1) Map recent programme delivery across England via a survey of local authorities; (2) conduct a realist review to enable understanding of how the National Health Service Health Check programme works in different settings, for different groups; (3) provide recommendations to improve delivery. Design Survey of local authorities and realist review of the literature. Review methods Realist review is a theory-driven, interpretive approach to evidence synthesis that seeks to explain why, when and for whom outcomes occur. We gathered published research and grey literature (including local evaluation documents and conference materials) via searching and supplementary methods. Extracted data were synthesised using a realist logic of analysis to develop an understanding of important contexts that affect the delivery of National Health Service Health Checks, and underlying mechanisms that produce outcomes related to our project focus. Results Our findings highlight the variation in National Health Service Health Check delivery models across England. Commissioners, providers and attendees understand the programme's purpose in different ways. When understood primarily as an opportunity to screen for disease, responsibility for delivery and outcomes rests with primary care, and there is an emphasis on volume of checks delivered, gathering essential data and communicating risk. When understood as an opportunity to prompt and support behaviour change, more emphasis is placed on delivery of advice and referrals to 'lifestyle services'. Practical constraints limit what can be delivered within the programme's remit. Public health funding restricts delivery options and links with onward services, while providers may struggle to deliver effective checks when faced with competing priorities. Attendees' responses to the programme are affected by features of delivery models and the constraints they face within their own lives. Limitations Survey response rate lower than anticipated; review findings limited by the availability and quality of the literature. Conclusions and implications The purpose and remit of the National Health Service Health Check programme should be clarified, considering prevailing attitudes about its value (especially among providers) and what can be delivered within existing resources. Some variation in delivery is likely to be appropriate to meet local population needs, but lack of clarity for the programme contributes to a 'postcode lottery' effect in the support offered to attendees after a check. Our findings raise important questions about whether the programme itself and services that it may feed into are adequately resourced to achieve positive outcomes for attendees, and whether current delivery models may produce inequitable outcomes. Future work Policy-makers and commissioners should consider the implications of the findings of this project; future research should address the relative scarcity of studies focused on the end of the National Health Service Health Check pathway. Study registration PROSPERO registration CRD42020163822. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme (NIHR129209).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Duddy
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Erica Gadsby
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Vivienne Hibberd
- Public Involvement in Pharmacy Studies Group, Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Greenwich and Kent, Chatham Maritime, UK
| | - Janet Krska
- Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Greenwich and Kent, Chatham Maritime, UK
| | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zubair M, Bown MJ, Armstrong N. Introducing multi-component cardiovascular health screening into existing Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) screening programmes in the UK: a qualitative study of programme staff views. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:569. [PMID: 35477458 PMCID: PMC9046009 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07975-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease is a major contributor to poor health in the UK and the leading cause of death in England. Peripheral arterial disease and high blood pressure are conditions that identify individuals at high cardiovascular disease risk, likely to benefit from cardiovascular risk management. Both conditions remain considerably underdiagnosed and untreated. The National Health Service abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programmes represent an opportunity to screen for these conditions with potentially minimal additional effort or cost. We explored AAA screening programme staff views on the proposed introduction of such additional screening within AAA screening. METHODS Nine focus groups and seven follow-on interviews were undertaken with 38 AAA screening staff. Our study methods were oriented broadly towards a grounded theory methodology, and data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Three themes were identified: (i) 'Perceptions of patient experience and health-related outcomes', (ii) 'Opportunities and challenges for programme staff', and (iii) 'Maintaining and improving programme standards'. Staff talked about the high uptake of AAA screening, staff experience and skills in their role, and the programme's high quality standards as both opportunities and potential challenges linked to the proposed additions to AAA screening. While positive about the potential to improve patients' health outcomes, participants had questions about the practicalities of incorporating additional procedures within their time- and resource-constrained context, and how this may reconfigure work processes, roles and relationships. CONCLUSIONS The proposed additions to the programme require taking staff's views into account. Key areas that need to be addressed relate to ensuring follow-up support for patients, clarity around staff responsibilities, and availability of sufficient resources for the programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Zubair
- Department of Health Sciences, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - Matthew J Bown
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - Natalie Armstrong
- Department of Health Sciences, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tanner L, Kenny R, Still M, Ling J, Pearson F, Thompson K, Bhardwaj-Gosling R. NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e052832. [PMID: 35172998 PMCID: PMC8852663 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update a rapid review published in 2017, which evaluated the NHS Health Check programme. METHODS An enlarged body of evidence was used to readdress six research objectives from a rapid review published in 2017, relating to the uptake, patient experiences and effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme. Data sources included MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Global Health, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence, Google Scholar, Google, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ISRCTN registry, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, The Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence, OpenGrey and hand searching article reference lists. These searches identified records from between January 1996 and December 2019. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal using the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme checklists were performed in duplicate. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations was implemented. Data were synthesised narratively. RESULTS 697 studies were identified, and 29 new studies included in the review update. The number of published studies on the uptake, patient experiences and effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme has increased by 43% since the rapid review published in 2017. However, findings from the original review remain largely unchanged. NHS Health Checks led to an overall increase in the detection of raised risk factors and morbidities including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, raised blood pressure, cholesterol and chronic kidney disease. Individuals most likely to attend the NHS Health Check programme included women, persons aged ≥60 years and those from more socioeconomically advantaged backgrounds. Opportunistic invitations increased uptake among men, younger persons and those with a higher deprivation level. CONCLUSIONS Although results are inconsistent between studies, the NHS Health Check programme is associated with increased detection of heightened cardiovascular disease risk factors and diagnoses. Uptake varied between population subgroups. Opportunistic invitations may increase uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Tanner
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rpw Kenny
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - M Still
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - J Ling
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | - F Pearson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - R Bhardwaj-Gosling
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
NHS Health Checks: an observational study of equity and outcomes 2009-2017. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:e701-e710. [PMID: 33587723 PMCID: PMC8216267 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2020.1021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The NHS Health Check cardiovascular prevention programme is now 10 years old. Aim To describe NHS Heath Check attendance, new diagnoses, and treatment in relation to equity indicators. Design and setting A nationally representative database derived from 1500 general practices from 2009–2017. Method The authors compared NHS Health Check attendance and new diagnoses and treatments by age, sex, ethnic group, and deprivation. Results In 2013–2017, 590 218 (16.9%) eligible people aged 40–74 years attended an NHS Health Check and 2 902 598 (83.1%) did not attend. South Asian ethnic groups were most likely to attend compared to others, and females more than males. New diagnoses were more likely in attendees than non-attendees: hypertension 25/1000 in attendees versus 9/1000 in non-attendees; type 2 diabetes 8/1000 versus 3/1000; and chronic kidney disease (CKD) 7/1000 versus 4/1000. In people aged ≥65 years, atrial fibrillation was newly diagnosed in 5/1000 attendees and 3/1000 non-attendees, and for dementia 2/1000 versus 1/1000, respectively. Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and CKD were more likely in more deprived groups, and in South Asian, Black African, and Black Caribbean ethnic groups. Attendees were more likely to be prescribed statins (26/1000) than non-attendees (8/1000), and antihypertensive medicines (25/1000 versus 13/1000 non-attendees). However, of the 117 963 people with ≥10% CVD risk who were eligible for statins, only 9785 (8.3%) were prescribed them. Conclusion Uptake of NHS Health Checks remains low. Attendees were more likely than non-attendees to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and CKD, and to receive treatment with statins and antihypertensives. Most attendees received neither treatment nor referral. Of those eligible for statins, <10% were treated. Policy reviews should consider a targeted approach prioritising those at highest CVD risk for face-to-face contact and consider other options for those at lower CVD risk.
Collapse
|
8
|
Schmidtke KA, Vlaev I, Kabbani S, Klauznicer H, Baasiri A, Osseiran A, El Rifai G, Fares H, Saleh N, Makki F. An exploratory randomised controlled trial evaluating text prompts in Lebanon to encourage health-seeking behaviour for hypertension. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e13669. [PMID: 32772451 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS OF THE STUDY The current study evaluates the effectiveness of an opportunistic mobile screening on the percentage of people who are aware of whether they may be hypertensive (in an observational study) and the effectiveness of reminder prompts on the percentage of people who seek further medical attention (in a randomised controlled trial). METHODS USED TO CONDUCT THE STUDY The screening of 1227 participants (529 female) was conducted during the registration period of the 2018 Beirut International Marathon in Lebanon. Next, 266 participants whose screening indicated hypertension (64 Female) were randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group in a 1:1 fashion. The treatment group received a reminder prompt to seek further medical attention for their potential hypertension and the control group did not. The overt nature of the text message meant that participants in the treatment group could not be blinded to their group allocation. The primary outcome is participants' self-reports of whether they sought further medical attention. RESULTS OF THE STUDY For the opportunistic screening, a 25% prevalence rate and a 24% awareness rate of hypertension was indicated. A McNemar analysis suggested that the screening increased participant awareness (X2 (N = 1227) = 72.16, P < .001). For the randomised controlled trial, 219 participants provided follow-up data via a phone call (82% retention). A Chi-squared analysis suggested that the reminder prompt successfully encouraged more participants to seek further medical attention, 45.5% treatment group vs 28.0% control group (X2 (1, N = 219) = 7.19, P = .007, φ = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS DRAWN AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Extra support in the form of a brief reminder message can increase the percentage of people who seek further medical attention after attending an opportunistic screening at a marathon event. The discussion reviews how the results align with previous research, strengths and limitations of the current study, and implications for future research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Schmidtke
- Medical School, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - I Vlaev
- Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - S Kabbani
- Cardiology Department, Rafik Hariri University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - H Klauznicer
- Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy, B4Development Foundation (formerly Qatar Behavioural Insights Unit), Doha, Qatar
| | | | | | | | - H Fares
- Nudge Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - N Saleh
- Nudge Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - F Makki
- Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy, B4Development Foundation (formerly Qatar Behavioural Insights Unit), Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Watkinson RE, Sutton M, Turner AJ. Ethnic inequalities in health-related quality of life among older adults in England: secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional survey. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 6:e145-e154. [PMID: 33516278 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30287-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The population of older adults (ie, those aged ≥55 years) in England is becoming increasingly ethnically diverse. Previous reports indicate that ethnic inequalities in health exist among older adults, but information is limited by the paucity of data from small minority ethnic groups. This study aimed to analyse inequalities in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and five determinants of health in older adults across all ethnic groups in England. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, we analysed data from five waves (July 1, 2014, to April 7, 2017) of the nationally representative English General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS). Study participants were adults aged 55 years or older who were registered with general practices in England. We used regression models (age-adjusted and stratified by gender) to estimate the association between ethnicity and HRQoL, measured by use of the EQ-5D-5L index and its domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression). We also estimated associations between ethnicity and five determinants of health (presence of long-term conditions or multimorbidity, experience of primary care, degree of support from local services, patient self-confidence in managing own health, and degree of area-level social deprivation). We examined robustness to differential handling of missing data, alternative EQ-5D-5L value sets, and differences in area-level social deprivation. FINDINGS There were 1 416 793 GPPS respondents aged 55 years and older. 1 394 361 (98·4%) respondents had complete data on ethnicity and gender and were included in our analysis. Of these, 152 710 (11·0%) self-identified as belonging to minority ethnic groups. HRQoL was worse for men or women, or both, in 15 (88·2%) of 17 minority ethnic groups than the White British ethnic group. In both men and women, inequalities were widest for Gypsy or Irish Traveller (linear regression coefficient -0·192 [95% CI -0·318 to -0·066] in men; -0·264 [-0·354 to -0·173] in women), Bangladeshi (-0·111 [-0·136 to -0·087] in men; -0·209 [-0·235 to -0·184] in women), Pakistani (-0·084 [-0·096 to -0·073] in men; -0·206 [-0·219 to -0·193] in women), and Arab (-0·061 [-0·086 to -0·035] in men; -0·145 [-0·180 to -0·110] in women) ethnic groups, with magnitudes generally greater for women than men. Differentials tended to be widest for the self-care EQ-5D-5L domain. Ethnic inequalities in HRQoL were accompanied by increased prevalence of long-term conditions or multimorbidity, poor experiences of primary care, insufficient support from local services, low patient self-confidence in managing their own health, and high area-level social deprivation, compared with the White British group. INTERPRETATION We found evidence of wide ethnic inequalities in HRQoL and five determinants of health for older adults in England. Outcomes varied between minority ethnic groups, highlighting heterogeneity in the direction and magnitude of associations. We recommend further research to understand the drivers of inequalities, together with policy changes to improve equity of socioeconomic opportunity and access to services for older adults from minority ethnic groups. FUNDING University of Manchester and National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Elizabeth Watkinson
- Health Organisation, Policy, and Economics Group, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Matt Sutton
- Health Organisation, Policy, and Economics Group, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alex James Turner
- Health Organisation, Policy, and Economics Group, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Geyti C, Christensen KS, Dalsgaard EM, Bech BH, Gunn J, Maindal HT, Sandbaek A. Factors associated with non-initiation of mental healthcare after detection of poor mental health at a scheduled health check: a cohort study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037731. [PMID: 33067280 PMCID: PMC7569988 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Poor mental health is an important public health concern, but mental health problems are often under-recognised. Providing feedback to general practitioners (GPs) on their patients' mental health status may improve the identification of cases in need of mental healthcare. OBJECTIVES To investigate the extent of initiation of mental healthcare after identification of poor mental health and to identify factors associated with non-initiation. DESIGN Prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up. SETTING In a population-based health preventive programme, Check Your Health, we conducted a combined mental and physical health check in Randers Municipality, Denmark, in 2012-2015 in collaboration with local GPs. PARTICIPANTS Participants were 350 individuals aged 30-49 years old with screen-detected poor mental health who had not received mental healthcare within the past year. The cohort was derived from 14 167 randomly selected individuals of whom 52% (n=7348) participated. Mental health was assessed by the mental component summary score of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. OUTCOME The outcome was initiation of mental healthcare. Mental healthcare included psychometric testing by GP, talk therapy by GP, contact with a psychologist, contact with a psychiatrist and psychotropic medication. RESULTS Within 1 year, 22% (95% CI 18 to 27) of individuals with screen-detected poor mental health initiated mental healthcare. Among individuals who initiated mental healthcare within follow-up, one in six had visited their GP once or less in the preceding year. Male sex (OR: 0.49 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.86)) and less impaired mental health (OR: 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.98)) were associated with non-initiation of mental healthcare. We found no overall association between socioeconomic factors and initiating mental healthcare. CONCLUSION Systematic provision of mental health test results to GPs may improve the identification of cases in need of mental healthcare, but does not translate into initiation of mental healthcare. Further research should focus on methods to improve initiation of mental healthcare, especially among men. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02028195.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Geyti
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kaj Sparle Christensen
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jane Gunn
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Annelli Sandbaek
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fisayo T. Risks of reacting to risk: rights and wrongs of health checks at 25 for BAME groups. BMJ 2020; 370:m2827. [PMID: 32694120 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Temitope Fisayo
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the community using data from OxRen: a UK population-based cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70:e285-e293. [PMID: 32041766 PMCID: PMC7015167 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x708245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a largely asymptomatic condition of diminished renal function, which may not be detected until advanced stages without screening. Aim To establish undiagnosed and overall CKD prevalence using a cross-sectional analysis. Design and setting Longitudinal cohort study in UK primary care. Method Participants aged ≥60 years were invited to attend CKD screening visits to determine whether they had reduced renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or albumin:creatinine ratio ≥3 mg/mmol). Those with existing CKD, low eGFR, evidence of albuminuria, or two positive screening tests attended a baseline assessment (CKD cohort). Results A total of 3207 participants were recruited and 861 attended the baseline assessment. The CKD cohort consisted of 327 people with existing CKD, 257 people with CKD diagnosed through screening (CKD prevalence of 18.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.9 to 19.6), and 277 with borderline/transient decreased renal function. In the CKD cohort, 54.4% were female, mean standard deviation (SD) age was 74.0 (SD 6.9) years, and mean eGFR was 58.0 (SD 18.4) ml/min/1.73 m2. Of the 584 with confirmed CKD, 44.0% were diagnosed through screening. Over half of the CKD cohort (51.9%, 447/861) fell into CKD stages 3–5 at their baseline assessment, giving an overall prevalence of CKD stages 3–5 of 13.9% (95% CI = 12.8 to 15.1). More people had reduced eGFR using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation than with CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in the 60–75-year age group and more had reduced eGFR using CKD-EPI in the ≥80-year age group. Conclusion This study found that around 44.0% of people living with CKD are undiagnosed without screening, and prevalence of CKD stages 1–5 was 18.2% in participants aged >60 years. Follow-up will provide data on annual incidence, rate of CKD progression, determinants of rapid progression, and predictors of cardiovascular events.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bunten A, Porter L, Gold N, Bogle V. A systematic review of factors influencing NHS health check uptake: invitation methods, patient characteristics, and the impact of interventions. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:93. [PMID: 31964366 PMCID: PMC6975079 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7889-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The NHS Health Check (NHSHC) is a risk assessment for those aged 40–74 without a pre-existing condition in England, with the aim of preventing stroke, kidney disease, heart disease, type 2 diabetes and dementia. Uptake has been lower than anticipated. Ensuring that a high percentage of eligible patients receive a NHSHC is key to optimising the clinical and cost effectiveness of the programme. The aim of this systematic review is to highlight interventions and invitation methods that increase the uptake of NHSHCs, and to identify whether the effectiveness of these interact with broader patient and contextual factors. Method A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist. Papers were eligible if they explored the impact of at least one of (i) interventions, (ii) invitation methods or (iii) broader factors on NHSHC uptake. Ten databases were searched in January 2016 and seven were searched in March 2018. Nine-hundred-and-forty-five papers were identified, 238 were screened and 64 full texts were assessed for eligibility. Nine studies were included in the review. Results The nine studies were all from peer reviewed journals. They included two randomised controlled trials, one observational cohort and six cross-sectional studies. Different invitation methods may be more effective for different groups of patients based on their ethnicity and gender. One intervention to enhance invitation letters effectively increased uptake but another did not. In addition, individual patient characteristics (such as age, gender, ethnicity and risk level) were found to influence uptake. This review also finds that uptake varies significantly by GP practice, which could be due either to unidentified practice-level factors or deprivation. Conclusions Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of different invitation methods for different population groups. Research should examine how existing invitation methods can be enhanced to drive uptake whilst reducing health inequalities. Trial registration This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO on 22.02.2016. Registration number CRD42016035626.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Bunten
- Public Health England, PHE Behavioural Insights Team (PHEBI), Research, Translation & Innovation Division, 6th Floor, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG, UK.
| | - Lucy Porter
- Public Health England, PHE Behavioural Insights Team (PHEBI), Research, Translation & Innovation Division, 6th Floor, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG, UK.,University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Natalie Gold
- Public Health England, PHE Behavioural Insights Team (PHEBI), Research, Translation & Innovation Division, 6th Floor, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mansfield K, Crellin E, Denholm R, Quint JK, Smeeth L, Cook S, Herrett E. Completeness and validity of alcohol recording in general practice within the UK: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031537. [PMID: 31772094 PMCID: PMC6887039 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2010 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has recommended screening adults for excessive alcohol consumption to try and help prevent alcohol-use disorders. Little is known about the extent to which these recommendations are followed, and the resulting completeness and validity of alcohol-related data recording in primary care. OBJECTIVE To investigate the completeness and accuracy of recording of alcohol use within primary care records in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. PARTICIPANTS We included all adult patients registered on 1st January 2018 with ≥1 year of follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES We calculated prevalence of alcohol consumption recording overall and within patient groups. We then validated alcohol consumption data against recommended screening tools (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)) as the gold standard. We also calculated how prevalence of alcohol recording changed over the preceding decade. RESULTS In 2018, among 1.8 million registered adult patients, just over half (51.9%) had a record for a code related to alcohol in the previous 5 years. Recording of alcohol consumption was more common among women, older people, ex-smokers and those from more deprived areas, who were overweight/obese, or with comorbidities. A quarter of patients had units per week recorded in the last 5 years, but <10% had an AUDIT or Fast Alcohol Screening Test (FAST) alcohol screening test score. The recorded alcohol measures corresponded to results from gold standard AUDIT scores. The distribution of consumption among current drinkers was similar to the Health Survey for England. CONCLUSIONS Half of adults in UK primary care have no recorded alcohol consumption data. When consumption is recorded, we have demonstrated internal and external validity of the data, suggesting greater recording may help identify opportunities for interventions to reduce harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Mansfield
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Rachel Denholm
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jennifer K Quint
- Respiratory Epidemiology,Occupational Medicine and Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Liam Smeeth
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sarah Cook
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Emily Herrett
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ashton RE, Tew GA, Robson WA, Saxton JM, Aning JJ. Cross-sectional study of patient-reported fatigue, physical activity and cardiovascular status in men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:4763-4770. [PMID: 30969369 PMCID: PMC6825227 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04794-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Patient-reported fatigue after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has not been characterised to date. Fatigue after other prostate cancer (PCa) treatments is known to impact on patient-reported quality of life. The aim of this study was to characterise fatigue, physical activity levels and cardiovascular status post-RARP. Methods Between October 2016 and March 2017, men post-RARP or on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were invited into the study. Participants were asked to complete the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and Stage of Change and Scottish Physical Activity Questionnaires (SPAQ) over a 2-week period. Outcome measures were patient-reported fatigue, physical activity levels and the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (Q-Risk). Data were analysed in SPSS. Results 96/117 (82%) men approached consented to participate; of these, 62/96 (65%) returned complete questionnaire data (RARP n = 42, ADT n = 20). All men reported fatigue with 9/42 (21%) post-RARP reporting clinically significant fatigue. Physical activity did not correlate with fatigue. On average, both groups were overweight (BMI 27.0 ± 3.9 kg/m2 and 27.8 ± 12.3 kg/m2 for RARP and ADT, respectively) and the post-RARP group had an 18.1% ± 7.4% Q-Risk2 score. Conclusions A proportion of men is at increased risk of cardiovascular disease within 10 years post-RARP and have substantial levels of fatigue; therefore, clinicians should consider including these factors when counselling patients about RARP. Additionally, men post-RARP did not meet the recommended guidelines for resistance-based exercise. Future research is needed to establish whether interventions including resistance-based exercise can improve health and fatigue levels in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Ashton
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Garry A Tew
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Wendy A Robson
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John M Saxton
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jonathan J Aning
- Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brangan E, Stone TJ, Chappell A, Harrison V, Horwood J. Patient experiences of telephone outreach to enhance uptake of NHS Health Checks in more deprived communities and minority ethnic groups: A qualitative interview study. Health Expect 2018; 22:364-372. [PMID: 30585389 PMCID: PMC6543263 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The NHS Health Checks preventative programme aims to reduce cardiovascular morbidity across England. To improve equity in uptake, telephone outreach was developed in Bristol, involving community workers telephoning patients amongst communities potentially at higher risk of cardiovascular disease and/or less likely to take up a written invitation, to engage them with NHS Health Checks. Where possible, caller cultural background/main language is matched with that of the patient called. The call includes an invitation to book an NHS Health Check appointment, lifestyle questions from the Health Check, and signposting to lifestyle services. Objective To explore the experiences of patients who received an outreach call. Design/Setting/Participants Thematic analysis of semi‐structured interviews with 24 patients (15 female), from seven primary care practices, who had received an outreach call. Results The call increased participants’ understanding of NHS Health Checks and overcame anticipated difficulties with making an appointment. Half reported that they would not have booked if only invited by letter. The cultural identity/language skills of the caller were important in facilitating the interaction for some who might otherwise encounter language or cultural barriers. The inclusion of lifestyle questions and signposting prompted a minority to make lifestyle changes. Conclusions Participants valued easily generalizable aspects of the intervention—a telephone invitation with ability to book during the call—and reported that it prompted acceptance of an NHS Health Check. A caller who shared their main language/cultural background was important for a minority of participants, and improved targeting of this would be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emer Brangan
- The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,The Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tracey J Stone
- The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,The Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Jeremy Horwood
- The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,The Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|