1
|
Basij-Rasikh M, Dickey ES, Sharkey A. Primary healthcare system and provider responses to the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e013760. [PMID: 38382976 PMCID: PMC10882370 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Existing health system challenges in Afghanistan were amplified by the Taliban's August 2021 government takeover during which the country faced an evolving security situation, border closures, banking interruptions, donor funding disruptions and international staff evacuations. We investigated factors that influenced health sector and health service delivery following the takeover. METHODS We purposively sampled individuals knowledgeable about Afghanistan's health sector and health professionals working in underserved areas of the country. We identified codes and themes of the data using framework analysis. RESULTS Factors identified as supporting continued health service delivery following August 2021 include external funding and operational flexibilities, ongoing care provision by local implementers and providers, health worker motivation, flexible contracting out arrangements and improved security. Factors identified as contributing to disruptions include damaged infrastructure, limited supplies, ineffective government implementation efforts and changes in government leadership and policies resulting in new coordination and capacity challenges. There were mixed views on the role pay-for-performance schemes played. Participants also shared concerns about the new working environment. These included loss of qualified health professionals and the associated impact on quality of care, continued dependency on external funding, women's inability to finish their studies or take on any leadership positions, various impacts of the Mahram policy, mental stress, the future of care provision for female patients and widespread economic hardship which impacts nearly every aspect of Afghan life. CONCLUSION Afghanistan's health sector presents a compelling case of adaptability in the face of crisis. Despite the anticipated and reported total collapse due to the country's power shift, various factors enabled health services to continue in some settings while others acted as barriers. The potential role of these factors should be considered in the context of future service delivery in Afghanistan and other settings at risk of political and societal disruption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Basij-Rasikh
- Center for Health and Wellbeing, Princeton University School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Elisa S Dickey
- Princeton University School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Alyssa Sharkey
- Center for Health and Wellbeing, Princeton University School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McPake B, Gilbert K, Vong S, Ros B, Has P, Khuong AT, Phuc PD, Hoang QC, Nguyen DH, Siengsounthone L, Luangphaxay C, Annear P, McKinley J. Role of regulatory capacity in the animal and human health systems in driving response to zoonotic disease outbreaks in the the Mekong region. One Health 2022; 14:100369. [PMID: 35106358 PMCID: PMC8784321 DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted a policy situation analysis in three Mekong region countries, focused on how the animal and human health systems interact to control avian influenza (AI). The study used scoping literature reviews aimed at establishing existing knowledge concerning the regulatory context. We then conducted a series of key informant interviews with national and sub-national government officials and representatives of producers and poultry farmers to understand their realities in managing the complex interface of the two sectors to control AI. We found signs of formal progress in establishing the policy and legislative frameworks needed to enable cooperation of the two sectors but a series of constraints that impede their effective operation. These included the competitive relationships involved, especially with budgetary allocations and mandates that can conflict with each other. Many local actors also view development partners (e.g., bilateral and multilateral donors) as having a dominant role in establishing these collaborations, limiting the extent to which there is local ownership of the agenda. The animal and human health sectors are not equally resourced, with the animal health sector disadvantaged in terms of surveillance and laboratory systems, human resources and financial allocations. Contrasting strategies for achieving objectives have also characterised the two sectors in recent decades, seeing a major shift towards the use of incentive-based approaches in the human health sector but very little parallel development in the animal health sector, largely dependent on command and control approaches. Successful future collaborations between the two sectors are likely to depend on better resourcing in the animal health sector, increasing local ownership of the agenda, and ensuring that both sectors can use the full range of regulatory strategies available to achieve objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara McPake
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Sreytouch Vong
- Independent consultants contracted by the Nossal Institute for Global Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Bandeth Ros
- Independent consultants contracted by the Nossal Institute for Global Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Phalmony Has
- National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | | | - Pham-Duc Phuc
- Center for Public Health and Ecosystem Research, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | | | - Duc Hai Nguyen
- Pasteur Institute Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | | | | | - Peter Annear
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Han D, Nagpal S, Bauhoff S. The Quality of Primary Care in Cambodia: An Assessment of Knowledge and Effort of Public Sector Maternal and Child Care Providers. Health Syst Reform 2022; 8:2124903. [PMID: 36174665 DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2022.2124903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Improving the quality of primary care is essential for achieving universal health coverage in low- and middle-income countries. This study examined the level and variation in primary care provider knowledge and effort in Cambodia, using cross-sectional data collected in 2014-2015 from public sector health centers in nine provinces. The data included clinical vignettes and direct observations of processes of antenatal care, postnatal care, and well-child visits and covered between 290-495 health centers and 370-847 individual providers for each service and type of data. The results indicate that provider knowledge and observed effort were generally low and varied across health centers and across individual providers. In addition, providers' effort scores were generally lower than their knowledge scores, indicating the presence of a "know-do gap." Although higher provider knowledge was correlated with higher levels of effort during patient encounters, knowledge only explained a limited fraction of the provider-level variation in effort. Due to low baseline performance and the know-do gap, improving provider adherence to clinical guidelines through training and practice standardization alone may have limited impact. Overall, the findings suggest that raising the low quality of care provided by Cambodia's public sector will require multidimensional interventions that involve training, strategies that increase provider motivation, and improved health center management. The authors reported there is no funding associated with the work presented in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Han
- Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Somil Nagpal
- Global Practice on Health, Nutrition and Population, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Sebastian Bauhoff
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asante AD, Ir P, Jacobs B, Supon L, Liverani M, Hayen A, Jan S, Wiseman V. Who benefits from healthcare spending in Cambodia? Evidence for a universal health coverage policy. Health Policy Plan 2020; 34:i4-i13. [PMID: 31644800 PMCID: PMC6807515 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Cambodia’s healthcare system has seen significant improvements in the last two decades. Despite this, access to quality care remains problematic, particularly for poor rural Cambodians. The government has committed to universal health coverage (UHC) and is reforming the health financing system to align with this goal. The extent to which the reforms have impacted the poor is not always clear. Using a system-wide approach, this study assesses how benefits from healthcare spending are distributed across socioeconomic groups in Cambodia. Benefit incidence analysis was employed to assess the distribution of benefits from health spending. Primary data on the use of health services and the costs associated with it were collected through a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 5000 households. Secondary data from the 2012–14 Cambodia National Health Accounts and other official documents were used to estimate the unit costs of services. The results indicate that benefits from health spending at the primary care level in the public sector are distributed in favour of the poor, with about 32% of health centre benefits going to the poorest population quintile. Public hospital outpatient benefits are quite evenly distributed across all wealth quintiles, although the concentration index of −0.058 suggests a moderately pro-poor distribution. Benefits for public hospital inpatient care are substantially pro-poor. The private sector was significantly skewed towards the richest quintile. Relative to health need, the distribution of total benefits in the public sector is pro-poor while the private sector is relatively pro-rich. Looking across the entire health system, health financing in Cambodia appears to benefit the poor more than the rich but a significant proportion of spending remains in the private sector which is largely pro-rich. There is the need for some government regulation of the private sector if Cambodia is to achieve its UHC goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augustine D Asante
- School of Public Health & Community Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Kensington NSW, Australia
| | - Por Ir
- National Institute of Public Health, Lot no 80, Street 289, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Bart Jacobs
- National Institute of Public Health, Lot no 80, Street 289, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | | | - Marco Liverani
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Kings Cross, London, UK.,Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Japan
| | - Andrew Hayen
- University of Technology Sydney (UTS), 15 Broadway, Ultimo NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen Jan
- The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, Australia.,University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Kensington NSW, Australia
| | - Virginia Wiseman
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Kings Cross, London, UK.,Kirby Institute for Infections and Immunity, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Level 6, Wallace Wurth Building, High Street, Kensington NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Annear PL, Tayu Lee J, Khim K, Ir P, Moscoe E, Jordanwood T, Bossert T, Nachtnebel M, Lo V. Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4:e001679. [PMID: 31798986 PMCID: PMC6861123 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cambodia's health equity fund (HEF) is the country's most significant social security scheme, covering the poorest one-fifth of the national population. During the last two decades, the HEF system was scaled up from an initial two health districts to national coverage of public health facilities. This is the first national study to examine the impact of the HEF on the utilisation of public health facilities. METHODS We first investigated the level of national HEF population coverage and health service use made by HEF eligible members using an administrative HEF operational dataset. Second, through multilevel interrupted time series analysis of routine monthly utilisation statistics during 2006-2013, we evaluated the impact of the HEF on hospital and health centre utilisation. RESULTS The proportion of HEF beneficiaries using hospital services in a given year (4.6%) appeared to exceed rates in the general population (3.3%). The introduction of the HEF was associated with: a significant level change in the monthly number of consultations at HCs followed by a gradual slope increase in time trend and a significant level change in the monthly number of deliveries. Overall, this was equivalent to a 15.6% net increase in number of consultations and 5.3% in deliveries in the first year. At RHs: a significant level change in the number of RH inpatient cases, followed by a sustained slope increase; a significant slope increase in the number of outpatient consultations and in the overall number of newborn deliveries. Overall, this was equivalent to a 47.9% net increase in inpatient cases, 24.1% in outpatient cases and 31.4% in deliveries in the first year. CONCLUSION The implementation of the HEF scheme was associated with increased utilisation of primary and secondary care services by the poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Tayu Lee
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Keovathanak Khim
- Public Health Department, University of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Por Ir
- National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Ellen Moscoe
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | | | - Thomas Bossert
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | | | - Veasnakiry Lo
- Department of Planning and Health Information, Ministry of Health, Cambodia, Cambodia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jacobs B, Hui K, Lo V, Thiede M, Appelt B, Flessa S. Costing for universal health coverage: insight into essential economic data from three provinces in Cambodia. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2019; 9:29. [PMID: 31667671 PMCID: PMC6822335 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-019-0246-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge of the costs of health services improves health facility management and aids in health financing for universal health coverage. Because of resource requirements that are often not present in low- and middle-income countries, costing exercises are rare and infrequent. Here we report findings from the initial phase of establishing a routine costing system for health services implemented in three provinces in Cambodia. METHODS Data was collected for the 2016 financial year from 20 health centres (including four with beds) and five hospitals (three district hospitals and two provincial hospitals). The costs to the providers for health centres were calculated using step-down allocations for selected costing units, including preventive and curative services, delivery, and patient contact, while for hospitals this was complemented with bed-day and inpatient day per department. Costs were compared by type of facility and between provinces. RESULTS All required information was not readily available at health facilities and had to be recovered from various sources. Costs per outpatient consultation at health centres varied between provinces (from US$2.33 to US$4.89), as well as within provinces. Generally, costs were inversely correlated with the quantity of service output. Costs per contact were higher at health centres with beds than health centres without beds (US$4.59, compared to US$3.00). Conversely, costs for delivery were lower in health centres with beds (US$128.7, compared to US$413.7), mainly because of low performing health centres without beds. Costs per inpatient-day varied from US$27.61 to US$55.87 and were most expensive at the lowest level hospital. CONCLUSIONS Establishing a routine health service costing system appears feasible if recording and accounting procedures are improved. Information on service costs by health facility level can provide useful information to optimise the use of available financial and human resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Jacobs
- Social Health Protection Programme, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GiZ), c/o NIPH, No.2, Street 289, Khan Toul Kork, P.O. Box 1238, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- Social Health Protection Network P4H, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Kelvin Hui
- Social Health Protection Programme, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GiZ), c/o NIPH, No.2, Street 289, Khan Toul Kork, P.O. Box 1238, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Veasnakiry Lo
- Department of Planning and Health Information, Ministry of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | | | - Bernd Appelt
- Social Health Protection Programme, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GiZ), c/o NIPH, No.2, Street 289, Khan Toul Kork, P.O. Box 1238, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Steffen Flessa
- Department of General Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bertone MP, Jowett M, Dale E, Witter S. Health financing in fragile and conflict-affected settings: What do we know, seven years on? Soc Sci Med 2019; 232:209-219. [PMID: 31102931 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Over the last few years, there has been growing attention to health systems research in fragile and conflict-affected setting (FCAS) from both researchers and donors. In 2012, an exploratory literature review was conducted to analyse the main themes and findings of recent literature focusing on health financing in FCAS. Seven years later, this paper presents an update of that review, reflecting on what has changed in terms of the knowledge base, and what are the on-going gaps and new challenges in our understanding of health financing in FCAS. A total of 115 documents were reviewed following a purposeful, non-systematic search of grey and published literature. Data were analysed according to key health financing themes, ensuring comparability with the 2012 review. Bibliometric analysis suggests that the field has continued to grow, and is skewed towards countries with a large donor presence (such as Afghanistan). Aid coordination remains the largest single topic within the themes, likely reflecting the dominance of external players, not just substantively but also in relation to research. Many studies are commissioned by external agencies and in addition to concerns about independence of findings there is also likely a neglect of smaller, more home-grown reforms. In addition, we find that despite efforts to coordinate approaches across humanitarian and developmental settings, the literature remains distinct between them. We highlight research gaps, including empirical analysis of domestic and external financing trends across FCAS and non-FCAS over time, to understand better common health financing trajectories, what drives them and their implications. We highlight a dearth of evidence in relation to health financing goals and objectives for UHC (such as equity, efficiency, financial access), which is significant given the relevance of UHC, and the importance of the social and political values which different health financing arrangements can communicate, which also merit in-depth study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Matthew Jowett
- Health Financing Unit, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Elina Dale
- Health Financing Unit, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Sophie Witter
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|