1
|
Regmi S, Bertone MP, Shrestha P, Sapkota S, Arjyal A, Martineau T, Raven J, Witter S, Baral S. Understanding health system resilience in responding to COVID-19 pandemic: experiences and lessons from an evolving context of federalization in Nepal. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:428. [PMID: 38575933 PMCID: PMC10996157 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10755-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has tested the resilience capacities of health systems worldwide and highlighted the need to understand the concept, pathways, and elements of resilience in different country contexts. In this study, we assessed the health system response to COVID-19 in Nepal and examined the processes of policy formulation, communication, and implementation at the three tiers of government, including the dynamic interactions between tiers. Nepal was experiencing the early stages of federalization reform when COVID-19 pandemic hit the country, and clarity in roles and capacity to implement functions were the prevailing challenges, especially among the subnational governments. METHODS We adopted a cross-sectional exploratory design, using mixed methods. We conducted a desk-based review of all policy documents introduced in response to COVID-19 from January to December 2020, and collected qualitative data through 22 key informant interviews at three tiers of government, during January-March 2021. Two municipalities were purposively selected for data collection in Lumbini province. Our analysis is based on a resilience framework that has been developed by our research project, ReBUILD for Resilience, which helps to understand pathways to health system resilience through absorption, adaptation and transformation. RESULTS In the newly established federal structure, the existing emergency response structure and plans were utilized, which were yet to be tested in the decentralized system. The federal government effectively led the policy formulation process, but with minimal engagement of sub-national governments. Local governments could not demonstrate resilience capacities due to the novelty of the federal system and their consequent lack of experience, confusion on roles, insufficient management capacity and governance structures at local level, which was further aggravated by the limited availability of human, technical and financial resources. CONCLUSIONS The study findings emphasize the importance of strong and flexible governance structures and strengthened capacity of subnational governments to effectively manage pandemics. The study elaborates on the key areas and pathways that contribute to the resilience capacities of health systems from the experience of Nepal. We draw out lessons that can be applied to other fragile and shock-prone settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Paola Bertone
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | - Tim Martineau
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joanna Raven
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sophie Witter
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Srivastava S, Bertone MP, Parmar D, Walsh C, De Allegri M. The genesis of the PM-JAY health insurance scheme in India: technical and political elements influencing a national reform towards universal health coverage. Health Policy Plan 2023:czad045. [PMID: 37436821 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czad045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Many countries are using health insurance to advance progress towards universal health coverage (UHC). India launched the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY) health insurance scheme in 2018. We examine the political economy context around PM-JAY policy formulation, by examining the perspectives of policy stakeholders shaping decisions around the reform. More specifically, we focus on early policy design at the central (national) level. We use a framework on the politics of UHC reform proposed by Fox and Reich (The politics of universal health coverage in low- and middle-income countries: A framework for evaluation and action. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 2015;40:1023-1060), to categorize the reform into phases and examine the interactions between actors, institutions, interests, ideas and ideology which shaped reform decisions. We interviewed 15 respondents in Delhi between February and April 2019, who were either closely associated with the reform process or subject experts. The ruling centre-right government introduced PM-JAY shortly before national elections, drawing upon policy legacies from prior and state insurance schemes. Empowered policy entrepreneurs within the government focused discourse around ideas of UHC and strategic purchasing, and engaged in institution building leading to the creation of the National Health Authority and State Health Agencies through policy directives, thereby expanding state infrastructural and institutional power for insurance implementation. Indian state inputs were incorporated in scheme design features like mode of implementation, benefit package and provider network, while features like the coverage amount, portability of benefits and branding strategy were more centrally driven. These balanced negotiations opened up political space for a cohesive, central narrative of the reform and facilitated adoption. Our analysis shows that the PM-JAY reform focused on bureaucratic rather than ideological elements and that technical compromises and adjustments accommodating the interests of states enabled the political success of policy formulation. Appreciating these politics, power and structural issues shaping PM-JAY institutional design will be important to understand how PM-JAY is implemented and how it advances UHC in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Srivastava
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg 69120, Germany
| | - M P Bertone
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Scotland EH21 6UU, UK
| | - D Parmar
- King's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - C Walsh
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg 69120, Germany
| | - M De Allegri
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg 69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Srivastava S, Bertone MP, Basu S, De Allegri M, Brenner S. Implementation of PM-JAY in India: a qualitative study exploring the role of competency, organizational and leadership drivers shaping early roll-out of publicly funded health insurance in three Indian states. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:65. [PMID: 37370159 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01012-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY), a publicly funded health insurance scheme, was launched in India in September 2018 to provide financial access to health services for poor Indians. PM-JAY design enables state-level program adaptations to facilitate implementation in a decentralized health implementation space. This study examines the competency, organizational, and leadership approaches affecting PM-JAY implementation in three contextually different Indian states. METHODS We used a framework on implementation drivers (competency, organizational, and leadership) to understand factors facilitating or hampering implementation experiences in three PM-JAY models: third-party administrator in Uttar Pradesh, insurance in Chhattisgarh, and hybrid in Tamil Nadu. We adopted a qualitative exploratory approach and conducted 92 interviews with national, state, district, and hospital stakeholders involved in program design and implementation in Delhi, three state capitals, and two anonymized districts in each state, between February and April 2019. We used a deductive approach to content analysis and interpreted coded material to identify linkages between organizational features, drivers, and contextual elements affecting implementation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION PM-JAY guideline flexibilities enabled implementation in very different states through state-adapted implementation models. These models utilized contextually relevant adaptations for staff and facility competencies and organizational and facilitative administration, which had considerable scope for improvement in terms of recruitment, competency development, programmatic implementation support, and rationalizing the joint needs of the program and implementers. Adaptations also created structural barriers in staff interactions and challenged implicit power asymmetries and organizational culture, indicating a need for aligning staff hierarchies and incentive structures. At the same time, specific adaptations such as decentralizing staff selection and task shifting (all models); sharing of claims processing between the insurer and state agency (insurance and hybrid model); and using stringent empanelment, accreditation, monitoring, and benchmarking criteria for performance assessment, and reserving secondary care benefit packages for public hospitals (both in the hybrid model) contributed to successful implementation. Contextual elements such as institutional memory of previous schemes and underlying state capacities influenced all aspects of implementation, including leadership styles and autonomy. These variations make comparisons across models difficult, yet highlight constraints and opportunities for cross-learning and optimizing implementation to achieve universal health coverage in decentralized contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Srivastava
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Maria Paola Bertone
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, United Kingdom
| | - Sharmishtha Basu
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, B - 5/1 & 5/2 Ground Floor, Safdurjung Enclave, 110029, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Manuela De Allegri
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brenner
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bertone MP, Palmer N, Kruja K, Witter S. How do we design and evaluate health system strengthening? Collaborative development of a set of health system process goals. Int J Health Plann Manage 2023; 38:279-288. [PMID: 36576082 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Strong health systems are widely recognized as a key requirement for improving health outcomes and also for ensuring that health systems are equitable, resilient and responsive to population needs. However, the related term Health Systems Strengthening (HSS) remains unclear and contested, and this creates challenges for how HSS can be monitored and evaluated. A previous review argued for the need to rethink evaluation methods for HSS to examine systemic effects of HSS investments. In line with that recommendation, this article describes the work of the HSS Evaluation Collaborative (HSSEC) in the development of a framework and tool to guide HSS monitoring, evaluation and learning by national and global actors. It was developed based on a rapid review of the literature and iterative expert consultation, with the aim of going beyond a focus on the building blocks of health systems and on health system outputs or health outcomes to think about the features that constitute a strong health system. As a result, we developed a list of 22 health system process goals which represent desirable attributes for health systems. The health system process goals (or rather, progress towards them) are influenced by positive and negative, intended and unintended effects of HSS interventions. Finally, we illustrate how the health system process goals can be operationalised for prospective and retrospective HSS monitoring, evaluation and learning, and how they also have the potential to be used for opening a space for participatory, inclusive policy dialogue about HSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.,ReBUILD for Resilience Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Krista Kruja
- Independent Consultant on Behalf of Itad Ltd, Hove, UK
| | - Sophie Witter
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.,ReBUILD for Resilience Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gooding K, Bertone MP, Loffreda G, Witter S. How can we strengthen partnership and coordination for health system emergency preparedness and response? Findings from a synthesis of experience across countries facing shocks. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1441. [PMID: 36447261 PMCID: PMC9706990 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08859-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discussions of health system resilience and emergency management often highlight the importance of coordination and partnership across government and with other stakeholders. However, both coordination and partnership have been identified as areas requiring further research. This paper identifies characteristics and enablers of effective coordination for emergency preparedness and response, drawing on experience from different countries with a range of shocks, including floods, drought, and COVID-19. METHODS The paper synthesises evidence from a set of reports related to research, evaluation and technical assistance projects, bringing together evidence from 11 countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Methods for the original reports included primary data collection through interviews, focus groups and workshop discussions, analysis of secondary data, and document review. Reports were synthesised using a coding framework, and quality of evidence was considered for reliability of the findings. RESULTS The reports highlighted the role played by coordination and partnership in preparedness and response, and identified four key areas that characterise and enable effective coordination. First, coordination needs to be inclusive, bringing together different government sectors and levels, and stakeholders such as development agencies, universities, the private sector, local leaders and civil society, with equitable gender representation. Second, structural aspects of coordination bodies are important, including availability of coordination structures and regular meeting fora; clear roles, mandates and sufficient authority; the value of building on existing coordination mechanisms; and ongoing functioning of coordination bodies, before and after crises. Third, organisations responsible for coordination require sufficient capacity, including staff, funding, communication infrastructure and other resources, and learning from previous emergencies. Fourth, effective coordination is supported by high-level political leadership and incentives for collaboration. Country experience also highlighted interactions between these components, and with the wider health system and governance architecture, pointing to the need to consider coordination as part of a complex adaptive system. CONCLUSION COVID-19 and other shocks have highlighted the importance of effective coordination and partnership across government and with other stakeholders. Using country experience, the paper identifies a set of recommendations to strengthen coordination for health system resilience and emergency management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Gooding
- grid.479394.40000 0000 8881 3751ReBUILD for Resilience and Oxford Policy Management, Clarendon House, Level 3, 52 Cornmarket Street, Oxford, OX1 3HJ UK
| | - Maria Paola Bertone
- grid.104846.fReBUILD for Resilience & Institute for Global Health and Development – Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU UK
| | - Giulia Loffreda
- grid.104846.fReBUILD for Resilience & Institute for Global Health and Development – Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU UK
| | - Sophie Witter
- grid.104846.fReBUILD for Resilience & Institute for Global Health and Development – Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ho LS, Bertone MP, Mansour W, Masaka C, Kakesa J. Health system resilience during COVID-19 understanding SRH service adaptation in North Kivu. Reprod Health 2022; 19:135. [PMID: 35668397 PMCID: PMC9169445 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01443-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is often collateral damage to health systems during epidemics, affecting women and girls the most, with reduced access to non-outbreak related services, particularly in humanitarian settings. This rapid case study examines sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in the Democratic Republic of the Congo when the COVID-19 hit, towards the end of an Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak, and in a context of protracted insecurity. Methods This study draws on quantitative analysis of routine data from four health zones, a document review of policies and protocols, and 13 key-informant interviews with staff from the Ministry of Public Health, United Nations agencies, international and national non-governmental organizations, and civil society organizations. Results Utilization of SRH services decreased initially but recovered by August 2020. Significant fluctuations remained across areas, due to the end of free care once Ebola funding ceased, insecurity, number of COVID-19 cases, and funding levels. The response to COVID-19 was top-down, focused on infection and prevention control measures, with a lack of funding, technical expertise and overall momentum that characterized the EVD response. Communities and civil society did not play an active role for the planning of the COVID-19 response. While health zone and facility staff showed resilience, developing adaptations to maintain SRH provision, these adaptations were short-lived and inconsistent without external support and funding. Conclusion The EVD outbreak was an opportunity for health system strengthening that was not sustained during COVID-19. This had consequences for access to SRH services, with limited-resources available and deprioritization of SRH. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-022-01443-5. Women and girls often face increased challenges to accessing healthcare during epidemics on top of pre-existing health disparities. There is emerging evidence that COVID-19 has had negative impacts on the health of women and girls in sub-Saharan Africa due to diverted funding, reduced services, negative socioeconomic impacts, and increased or new barriers to access. In the DRC, COVID-19 hit shortly after the end of an Ebola epidemic within a context of protracted insecurity. This study used mixed methods and drew upon 13 interviews to examine the effects of COVID-19 on SRH services in North Kivu and how the health system did or did not adapt to ensure continued access and utilization of SRH services. There was limited prioritization of SRH during COVID-19. Although the government issued policies on how to adapt SRH services, these were developed centrally, without much guidance on how to operationalize these policies in different contexts. Consequently, healthcare providers and civil society actors developed their own ways to continue activities at local levels, not necessarily in a systematic way. There was limited longer-term strengthening of the health system that could adapt to the subsequent COVID-19 pandemic aside from increased capacity of healthcare providers to manage infection prevention and control measures. However, this was hampered by the lack of personal protective equipment that received no external support. Therefore, donors need to consider how resources can be leveraged to support sustained strengthening of the health system to be able to adapt to shocks even when resources are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara S Ho
- International Rescue Committee, Health Unit and ReBUILD for Resilience, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Maria Paola Bertone
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University and ReBUILD for Resilience, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Wesam Mansour
- Department of International Public Health and ReBUILD for Resilience, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
| | - Cyprien Masaka
- International Rescue Committee, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Jessica Kakesa
- International Rescue Committee, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Witter S, Bertone MP, Diaconu K, Bornemisza O. Performance-based Financing versus "Unconditional" Direct Facility Financing - False Dichotomy? Health Syst Reform 2021; 7:e2006121. [PMID: 34874806 DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2021.2006121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A debate about how best to finance essential health care in low- and middle-income settings has been running for decades, with public health systems often failing to provide reliable and adequate funding for primary health care in particular. Since 2000, many have advocated and experimented with performance-based financing as one approach to addressing this problem. More recently, in light of concerns over high transaction costs, mixed results and challenges of sustainability, a less conditional approach, sometimes called direct facility financing, has come into favor. In this commentary, we examine the evidence for the effectiveness of both modalities and argue that they share many features and requirements for effectiveness. In the right context, both can contribute to health system strengthening, and they should be seen as potentially complementary, rather than as rivals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Witter
- Institute of Global Health and Development & ReBUILD for Resilience, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Maria Paola Bertone
- Institute of Global Health and Development & ReBUILD for Resilience, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Karin Diaconu
- Institute of Global Health and Development & ReBUILD for Resilience, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Olga Bornemisza
- Health Systems Strengthening, Global Fund for Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jacobs E, Bertone MP, Toonen J, Akwataghibe N, Witter S. Performance-Based Financing, Basic Packages of Health Services and User-Fee Exemption Mechanisms: An Analysis of Health-Financing Policy Integration in Three Fragile and Conflict-Affected Settings. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2020; 18:801-810. [PMID: 32193836 PMCID: PMC7717041 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00567-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As performance-based financing (PBF) is increasingly implemented across sub-Saharan Africa, some authors have suggested that it could be a 'stepping stone' for health-system strengthening and broad health-financing reforms. However, so far, few studies have looked at whether and how PBF is aligned to and integrated with national health-financing strategies, particularly in fragile and conflict-affected settings. OBJECTIVE This study attempts to address the existing research gap by exploring the role of PBF with reference to: (1) user fees/exemption policies and (2) basic packages of health services and benefit packages in the Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria. METHODS The comparative case study is based on document review, key informant interviews and focus-group discussions with stakeholders at national and subnational levels. RESULTS The findings highlight different experiences in terms of PBF's integration. Although (formal or informal) fee exemption or reduction practices exist in all settings, their implementation is not uniform and they are often introduced by external programmes, including PBF, in an uncoordinated and vertical fashion. Additionally, the degree to which PBF indicators lists are aligned to the national basic packages of health services varies across cases, and is influenced by factors such as funders' priorities and budgetary concerns. CONCLUSIONS Overall, we find that where national leadership is stronger, PBF is better integrated and more in line with the health-financing regulations and, during phases of acute crisis, can provide structure and organisation to the system. Where governmental stewardship is weaker, PBF may result in another parallel programme, potentially increasing fragmentation in health financing and inequalities between areas supported by different donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eelco Jacobs
- Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maria Paola Bertone
- ReBUILD and Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jurrien Toonen
- Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD and Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Witter S, Chirwa Y, Chandiwana P, Munyati S, Pepukai M, Bertone MP, Banda S. Results-based financing as a strategic purchasing intervention: some progress but much further to go in Zimbabwe? BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:180. [PMID: 32143626 PMCID: PMC7059677 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-5037-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results-Based Financing (RBF) has proliferated in the health sectors of low and middle income countries, especially those which are fragile or conflict-affected, and has been presented by some as a way of reforming and strengthening strategic purchasing. However, few if any studies have empirically and systematically examined how RBF impacts on health care purchasing. This article examines this question in the context of Zimbabwe's national RBF programme. METHODS The article is based on a documentary review, including 60 documents from 2008 to 2018, and 40 key informant (KI) interviews conducted with international, national and district level stakeholders in early 2018 in Zimbabwe. Interviews and analysis of both datasets followed an existing framework for strategic purchasing, adapted to reflect changes over. RESULTS We find that some functions, such as assessing service infrastructure gaps, are unaffected by RBF, while others, such as mobilising resources, are partially affected, as RBF has focused on one package of care (maternal and child health services) within the wider essential health care, and has contributed important but marginal costs. Overall purchasing arrangements remain fragmented. Limited improvements have been made to community engagement. The clearest changes to purchasing arrangements relate to providers, at least in relation to the RBF services. Its achievements included enabling flexible resources to reach primary providers, funding supervision and emphasising the importance of reporting. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis suggests that RBF in Zimbabwe, at least at this early stage, is mainly functioning as an additional source of funding and as a provider payment mechanism, focussed on the primary care level for MCH services. RBF in this case brought focus to specific outputs but remained one provider payment mechanism amongst many, with limited traction over the main service delivery inputs and programmes. Zimbabwe's economic and political crisis provided an important entry point for RBF, but Zimbabwe did not present a 'blank slate' for RBF to reform: it was a functional health system pre-crisis, which enabled relatively swift scale-up of RBF but also meant that the potential for restructuring of institutional purchasing relationships was limited. This highlights the need for realistic and contextually tailored expectations of RBF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD programme, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU Scotland
| | - Yotamu Chirwa
- ReBUILD and Biomedical Research and Training Institute, P O Box CY, 1753 Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Pamela Chandiwana
- Biomedical Research and Training Institute, 10 Seagrave Road, Avondale, Harare Zimbabwe
| | - Shungu Munyati
- Biomedical Research and Training Institute, 10 Seagrave Road, Avondale, Harare Zimbabwe
| | - Mildred Pepukai
- Biomedical Research and Training Institute, 10 Seagrave Road, Avondale, Harare Zimbabwe
| | | | - Steve Banda
- Policy and Planning, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Witter S, Chirwa Y, Chandiwana P, Munyati S, Pepukai M, Bertone MP. The political economy of results-based financing: the experience of the health system in Zimbabwe. Glob Health Res Policy 2019; 4:20. [PMID: 31338425 PMCID: PMC6628468 DOI: 10.1186/s41256-019-0111-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2000, results based financing (RBF) has proliferated in health sectors in Africa in particular, including in fragile and conflict affected settings (FCAS) and there is a growing but still contested literature about its relevance and effectiveness. Less examined are the political economy factors behind the adoption of the RBF policy, as well as the shifts in influence and resources which RBF may bring about. In this article, we examine these two topics, focusing on Zimbabwe, which has rolled out RBF nationwide in the health system since 2011, with external support. METHODS The study uses an adapted political economy framework, integrating data from 40 semi-structured interviews with local, national and international experts in 2018 and thematic analysis of 60 policy documents covering the decade between 2008 and 2018. RESULTS Our findings highlight the role of donors in initiating the RBF policy, but also how the Zimbabwe health system was able to adapt the model to suit its particular circumstances - seeking to maintain a systemic approach, and avoiding fragmentation. Although Zimbabwe was highly resource dependent after the political-economic crisis of the 2000s, it retained managerial and professional capacity, which distinguishes it from many other FCAS settings. This active adaptation has engendered national ownership over time, despite initial resistance to the RBF model and despite the complexity of RBF, which creates dependence on external technical support. Adoption was also aided by ideological retro-fitting into an earlier government performance management policy. The main beneficiaries of RBF were frontline providers, who gained small but critical additional resources, but subject to high degrees of control and sanctions. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights resource-seeking motivations for adopting RBF in some low and middle income settings, especially fragile ones, but also the potential for local health system actors to shape and adapt RBF to suit their needs in some circumstances. This means less structural disruption in the health system and it increases the likelihood of an integrated approach and sustainability. We highlight the mix of autonomy and control which RBF can bring for frontline providers and argue for clearer understanding of the role that RBF commonly plays in these settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD programme, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU UK
| | - Yotamu Chirwa
- ReBUILD and Biomedical Research and Training Institute, P O Box CY 1753, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Pamela Chandiwana
- Biomedical Research and Training Institute, P O Box CY 1753, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Shungu Munyati
- Biomedical Research and Training Institute, P O Box CY 1753, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Mildred Pepukai
- Biomedical Research and Training Institute, P O Box CY 1753, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many countries face challenges in terms of number, skill mix, quality and distribution of the health workforce. This paper provides an overview of interventions focusing on retention adopted over the last decade in seven countries of francophone Africa. We assessed these interventions with respect to WHO guidelines and evaluated the extent of application of these recommended policies. METHODS This study was conducted according to a comparative multiple case-study design and comprised two phases. First, seven country reports were consulted to provide a mapping and preliminary analysis of the interventions. Secondly, an analytic synthesis was prepared by systematically and deliberately comparing and contrasting country cases in order to draw higher-level conclusions. RESULTS This comparative analysis indicated that some WHO guidelines are introduced less often than others and HRH retention policies are rarely envisaged within coherent ?bundles' of interventions. This analysis identifies the efforts to develop local (informal) strategies tailored to the context, while official policy-making often remains a standardized exercise, which does not take context-specific features into account. Moreover, little information is available on the implementation and effectiveness of existing policies. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The study stresses the importance of two key issues for the design of effective policies: the availability of sound data, as well as monitoring and evaluation structures, and the creation of a supportive and coherent political environment, focused on country-driven, realistic policy-making based on contextual problem identification and actual needs. This paper also suggests that good practices are often the result of local adaptations, rather than the close adoption of standardized guidelines. Therefore, in order to be effective, international guidelines must be complemented by locally acquired and fully appropriated knowledge.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bertone MP, Jowett M, Dale E, Witter S. Health financing in fragile and conflict-affected settings: What do we know, seven years on? Soc Sci Med 2019; 232:209-219. [PMID: 31102931 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Over the last few years, there has been growing attention to health systems research in fragile and conflict-affected setting (FCAS) from both researchers and donors. In 2012, an exploratory literature review was conducted to analyse the main themes and findings of recent literature focusing on health financing in FCAS. Seven years later, this paper presents an update of that review, reflecting on what has changed in terms of the knowledge base, and what are the on-going gaps and new challenges in our understanding of health financing in FCAS. A total of 115 documents were reviewed following a purposeful, non-systematic search of grey and published literature. Data were analysed according to key health financing themes, ensuring comparability with the 2012 review. Bibliometric analysis suggests that the field has continued to grow, and is skewed towards countries with a large donor presence (such as Afghanistan). Aid coordination remains the largest single topic within the themes, likely reflecting the dominance of external players, not just substantively but also in relation to research. Many studies are commissioned by external agencies and in addition to concerns about independence of findings there is also likely a neglect of smaller, more home-grown reforms. In addition, we find that despite efforts to coordinate approaches across humanitarian and developmental settings, the literature remains distinct between them. We highlight research gaps, including empirical analysis of domestic and external financing trends across FCAS and non-FCAS over time, to understand better common health financing trajectories, what drives them and their implications. We highlight a dearth of evidence in relation to health financing goals and objectives for UHC (such as equity, efficiency, financial access), which is significant given the relevance of UHC, and the importance of the social and political values which different health financing arrangements can communicate, which also merit in-depth study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Matthew Jowett
- Health Financing Unit, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Elina Dale
- Health Financing Unit, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Sophie Witter
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Witter S, Bertone MP, Namakula J, Chandiwana P, Chirwa Y, Ssennyonjo A, Ssengooba F. (How) does RBF strengthen strategic purchasing of health care? Comparing the experience of Uganda, Zimbabwe and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Glob Health Res Policy 2019; 4:3. [PMID: 30734000 PMCID: PMC6354347 DOI: 10.1186/s41256-019-0094-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results-Based Financing (RBF) has proliferated in health sectors of low and middle income countries, especially fragile and conflict-affected ones, and has been presented as a way of reforming and strengthening strategic purchasing. However, few studies have empirically examined how RBF impacts on health care purchasing in these settings. This article examines the effects of several RBF programmes on health care purchasing functions in three fragile and post-conflict settings: Uganda, Zimbabwe and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) over the past decade. METHODS The article is based on a documentary review, including 110 documents from 2004 to 2018, and 98 key informant (KI) interviews conducted with international, national and district level stakeholders in early 2018 in the selected districts of the three countries. Interviews and analysis followed an adapted framework for strategic purchasing, which was also used to compare across the case studies. RESULTS Across the cases, at the government level, we find little change to the accountability of purchasers, but RBF does mobilise additional resources to support entitlements. In relation to the population, RBF appears to bring in improvements in specifying and informing about entitlements for some services. However, the engagement and consultation with the population on their needs was found to be limited. In relation to providers, RBF did not impact in any major way on provider accreditation and selection, or on treatment guidelines. However, it did introduce a more contractual relationship for some providers and bring about (at least partial) improvements in provider payment systems, data quality, increased financial autonomy for primary providers and enforcing equitable strategies. More generally, RBF has been a source of much-needed revenue at primary care level in under-funded health systems. The context - particularly the degree of stability and authority of government-, the design of the RBF programme and the potential for effective integration of RBF in existing systems and its stage of development were key factors behind differences observed. CONCLUSIONS Our evidence suggests that expectations of RBF as an instrument of systemic reform should be nuanced, while focusing instead on expanding the key areas of potential gain and ensuring better integration and institutionalisation, towards which two of the three case study countries are working.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yotamu Chirwa
- Biomedical Research and training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bertone MP, Martins JS, Pereira SM, Martineau T, Alonso-Garbayo A. Understanding HRH recruitment in post-conflict settings: an analysis of central-level policies and processes in Timor-Leste (1999-2018). Hum Resour Health 2018; 16:66. [PMID: 30486844 PMCID: PMC6263550 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-018-0325-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although human resources for health (HRH) represent a critical element for health systems, many countries still face acute HRH challenges. These challenges are compounded in conflict-affected settings where health needs are exacerbated and the health workforce is often decimated. A body of research has explored the issues of recruitment of health workers, but the literature is still scarce, in particular with reference to conflict-affected states. This study adds to that literature by exploring, from a central-level perspective, how the HRH recruitment policies changed in Timor-Leste (1999-2018), the drivers of change and their contribution to rebuilding an appropriate health workforce after conflict. METHODS This research adopts a retrospective, qualitative case study design based on 76 documents and 20 key informant interviews, covering a period of almost 20 years. Policy analysis, with elements of political economy analysis was conducted to explore the influence of actors and structural elements. RESULTS Our findings describe the main phases of HRH policy-making during the post-conflict period and explore how the main drivers of this trajectory shaped policy-making processes and outcomes. While initially the influence of international actors was prominent, the number and relevance of national actors, and resulting influence, later increased as aid dependency diminished. However, this created a fragmented institutional landscape with diverging agendas and lack of inter-sectoral coordination, to the detriment of the long-term strategic development of the health workforce and the health sector. CONCLUSIONS The study provides critical insights to improve understanding of HRH policy development and effective practices in a post-conflict setting but also looking at the longer term evolution. An issue that emerges across the HRH policy-making phases is the difficulty of reconciling the technocratic with the social, cultural and political concerns. Additionally, while this study illuminates processes and dynamics at central level, further research is needed from the decentralised perspective on aspects, such as deployment, motivation and career paths, which are under-regulated at central level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- ReBUILD Consortium & Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Queen Margaret Drive, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Joao S. Martins
- ReBUILD Consortium & Faculdade de Medicina e Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosa’e, Dili, Timor-Leste
| | - Sara M. Pereira
- ReBUILD Consortium & Faculdade de Medicina e Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosa’e, Dili, Timor-Leste
| | - Tim Martineau
- ReBUILD Consortium & Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Alvaro Alonso-Garbayo
- ReBUILD Consortium & Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bertone MP, Wurie H, Samai M, Witter S. The bumpy trajectory of performance-based financing for healthcare in Sierra Leone: agency, structure and frames shaping the policy process. Global Health 2018; 14:99. [PMID: 30342544 PMCID: PMC6195985 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-018-0417-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As performance-based financing (PBF) has been increasingly implemented in low-income countries, a growing literature has developed, assessing its effectiveness and, more recently, focussing on the political dynamics of PBF introduction and implementation. This study contributes to the latter body of literature by exploring decision-making processes on PBF in Sierra Leone during the 2010-2017 period. Sierra Leone presents an interesting case because of the 'start-stop-start' trajectory of PBF. METHODS The qualitative case study is based on a document review and 25 key informant interviews with national stakeholders and international actors. Documents and interviews were analysed based on a political economy framework focusing on actors and structure, but also making use of concepts drawn from interpretive policy analysis to look at frames. RESULTS Our analysis describes the process of negotiation and re-negotiation of PBF in Sierra Leone, highlighting the role of different players, both internal and external, their ideas, capacity and power relations, and the shifting narratives around PBF. It is shown that external actors driving the debate make use of 'frames', both actual (i.e., defining the timing and pace of the discussions, the funding available, etc.) and metaphorical (i.e., how PBF is interpreted, defined and understood) to fit in and influence the debate. This is facilitated by the lack of capacity and resources in the fragile setting. Other strategies, such as 'venue shopping' are employed, though they may add to fragmentation in the volatile context. CONCLUSIONS The retrospective view of the study has an analytical advantage, but findings are also relevant to guide practice. Although power relations and rent-seeking issues are difficult to overcome in resource and capacity-constrained settings, more attention could be paid to other elements. In particular, adopting shared frames to ensure a common and inclusive understanding of technical concepts such as PBF may be useful to ensure the political sustainability of reforms. Also, the 'actual frames' which define negotiation and implementation should remain flexible, allowing for disrupting events (e.g., the Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone) as well as for time to develop national capacity and ownership in order to ensure longer-term political support and better health system integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- ReBUILD & Institute for Global Health and Development (IGHD), Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Haja Wurie
- ReBUILD & College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences (COMAHS), Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Mohamed Samai
- ReBUILD & College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences (COMAHS), Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD & Institute for Global Health and Development (IGHD), Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bertone MP, Jacobs E, Toonen J, Akwataghibe N, Witter S. Performance-based financing in three humanitarian settings: principles and pragmatism. Confl Health 2018; 12:28. [PMID: 29983733 PMCID: PMC6020366 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-018-0166-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performance based financing (PBF) has been increasingly implemented across low and middle-income countries, including in fragile and humanitarian settings, which present specific features likely to require adaptation and to influence implementation of any health financing programme. However, the literature has been surprisingly thin in the discussion of how PBF has been adapted to different contexts, and in turn how different contexts may influence PBF. With case studies from three humanitarian settings (northern Nigeria, Central African Republic and South Kivu in the Democratic Republic of Congo), we examine why and how PBF has emerged and has been adapted to those unsettled and dynamic contexts, what the opportunities and challenges have been, and what lessons can be drawn. METHODS Our comparative case study is based on data collected from a document review, 35 key informant interviews and 16 focus group discussions with stakeholders at national and subnational level in the three settings. Data were analysed in order to describe and compare each setting in terms of underlying fragility features and their implications for the health system, and to look at how PBF has been adopted, implemented and iteratively adapted to respond to acute crisis, deal with other humanitarian actors and involve local communities. RESULTS Our analysis reveals that the challenging environments required a high degree of PBF adaptation and innovation, at times contravening the so-called 'PBF principles' that have become codified. We develop an analytical framework to highlight the key nodes where adaptations happen, the contextual drivers of adaptation, and the organisational elements that facilitate adaptation and may sustain PBF programmes. CONCLUSIONS Our study points to the importance of pragmatic adaptation in PBF design and implementation to reflect the contextual specificities, and identifies elements (such as, organisational flexibility, local staff and knowledge, and embedded long-term partners) that could facilitate adaptations and innovations. These findings and framework are useful to spark a reflection among PBF donors and implementers on the relevance of incorporating, reinforcing and building on those elements when designing and implementing PBF programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- ReBUILD & Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Eelco Jacobs
- Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jurrien Toonen
- Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD & Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
De Allegri M, Bertone MP, McMahon S, Mounpe Chare I, Robyn PJ. Unraveling PBF effects beyond impact evaluation: results from a qualitative study in Cameroon. BMJ Glob Health 2018; 3:e000693. [PMID: 29607103 PMCID: PMC5873544 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Revised: 01/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Performance-based financing (PBF) has acquired increased prominence as a means of reforming health system purchasing structures in low-income and middle-income countries. A number of impact evaluations have noted that PBF often produces mixed and heterogeneous effects. Still, little systematic effort has been channelled towards understanding what causes such heterogeneity, including looking more closely at implementation processes. METHODS Our qualitative study aimed at closing this gap in knowledge by attempting to unpack the mixed and heterogeneous effects detected by the PBF impact evaluation in Cameroon to inform further implementation as the country scales up the PBF approach. We collected data at all levels of the health system (national, district, facility) and at the community level, using a mixture of in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. We combined deductive and inductive analytical techniques and applied analyst triangulation. RESULTS Our findings indicate that heterogeneity in effects across facilities could be explained by pre-existing infrastructural weaknesses coupled with rigid administrative processes and implementation challenges, while heterogeneity across indicators could be explained by providers' practices, privileging services where demand-side barriers were less substantive. CONCLUSION In light of the country's commitment to scaling up PBF, it follows that substantial efforts (particularly entrusting facilities with more financial autonomy) should be made to overcome infrastructural and demand-side barriers and to smooth implementation processes, thus, enabling healthcare providers to use PBF resources and management models to a fuller potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela De Allegri
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Paola Bertone
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shannon McMahon
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Paul Jacob Robyn
- Health, Nutrition, and Population Unit, The World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Antony M, Bertone MP, Barthes O. Exploring implementation practices in results-based financing: the case of the verification in Benin. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:204. [PMID: 28288637 PMCID: PMC5348780 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2148-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results-based financing (RBF) has been introduced in many countries across Africa and a growing literature is building around the assessment of their impact. These studies are usually quantitative and often silent on the paths and processes through which results are achieved and on the wider health system effects of RBF. To address this gap, our study aims at exploring the implementation of an RBF pilot in Benin, focusing on the verification of results. METHODS The study is based on action research carried out by authors involved in the pilot as part of the agency supporting the RBF implementation in Benin. While our participant observation and operational collaboration with project's stakeholders informed the study, the analysis is mostly based on quantitative and qualitative secondary data, collected throughout the project's implementation and documentation processes. Data include project documents, reports and budgets, RBF data on service outputs and on the outcome of the verification, daily activity timesheets of the technical assistants in the districts, as well as focus groups with Community-based Organizations and informal interviews with technical assistants and district medical officers. RESULTS Our analysis focuses on the actual practices of quantitative, qualitative and community verification. Results show that the verification processes are complex, costly and time-consuming, and in practice they end up differing from what designed originally. We explore the consequences of this on the operation of the scheme, on its potential to generate the envisaged change. We find, for example, that the time taken up by verification procedures limits the time available for data analysis and feedback to facility staff, thus limiting the potential to improve service delivery. Verification challenges also result in delays in bonus payment, which delink effort and reward. Additionally, the limited integration of the verification activities of district teams with their routine tasks causes a further verticalization of the health system. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight the potential disconnect between the theory of change behind RBF and the actual scheme's implementation. The implications are relevant at methodological level, stressing the importance of analyzing implementation processes to fully understand results, as well as at operational level, pointing to the need to carefully adapt the design of RBF schemes (including verification and other key functions) to the context and to allow room to iteratively modify it during implementation. They also question whether the rationale for thorough and costly verification is justified, or rather adaptations are possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Antony
- AEDES Consulting, Rue Joseph II 34, Brussels, 1000, Belgium.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Witter S, Bertone MP, Chirwa Y, Namakula J, So S, Wurie HR. Evolution of policies on human resources for health: opportunities and constraints in four post-conflict and post-crisis settings. Confl Health 2017; 10:31. [PMID: 28115986 PMCID: PMC5241914 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-016-0099-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few studies look at policy making in the health sector in the aftermath of a conflict or crisis and even fewer specifically focus on Human Resources for Health, which is a critical domain for health sector performance. The main objective of the article is to shed light on the patterns and drivers of post-conflict policy-making. In particular, we explore whether the post -conflict period offers increased chances for the opening of ‘windows for opportunity’ for change and reform and the potential to reset health systems. Methods This article uses a comparative policy analysis framework. It is based on qualitative data, collected using three main tools - stakeholder mapping, key informant interviews and document reviews - in Uganda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia and Zimbabwe. Results We found that HRH challenges were widely shared across the four cases in the post-conflict period but that the policy trajectories were different – driven by the nature of the conflicts but also the wider context. Our findings suggest that there is no formula for whether or when a ‘window of opportunity’ will arise which allows health systems to be reset. Problems are well understood in all four cases but core issues – such as adequate pay, effective distribution and HRH management – are to a greater or lesser degree unresolved. These problems are not confined to post-conflict settings, but underlying challenges to addressing them – including fiscal space, political consensus, willingness to pursue public objectives over private, and personal and institutional capacity to manage technical solutions – are liable to be even more acute in these settings. The role of the MoH emerged as weaker than expected, while the shift from donor dependence was clearly not linear and can take a considerable time. Conclusions Windows of opportunity for change and reform can occur but are by no means guaranteed by a crisis – rather they depend on a constellation of leadership, financing, and capacity. Recognition of urgency is certainly a facilitator but not sufficient alone. Post-conflict environments face particularly severe challenges to evidence-based policy making and policy implementation, which also constrain their ability to effectively use the windows which are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD and Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU UK
| | - Maria Paola Bertone
- Department of Global Health and Development & ReBUILD Consortium, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Yotamu Chirwa
- ReBUILD and Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Justine Namakula
- ReBUILD and Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Sovannarith So
- ReBUILD and Cambodian Development Resource Institute, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Haja R Wurie
- ReBUILD Consortium and College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Exploring the entire set of formal and informal payments available to health workers (HWs) is critical to understand the financial incentives they face and devise effective incentive packages to motivate them. We investigate this issue in the context of Sierra Leone by collecting quantitative data through a survey and daily logbooks on the incomes of 266 HWs in three districts, and carrying out 39 qualitative in-depth interviews. We find that, while earnings related to the HWs official jobs represent the largest share, their income is fragmented and composed of a variety of payments, and there is a large heterogeneity in the importance of each income source within the total remuneration. Importantly, each income has different features in terms of regularity, reliability, ease of access, etc. Our analysis also reveals the determinants of the incomes received and their level based on individual and facility characteristics, and finds that these are not in line with HRH policies defined at national level. Additionally, from their narratives, it emerges that HWs are 'managing', in the sense both of 'getting by' and of enacting financial coping strategies, such as mental accounting (spending different incomes differently), income hiding to shelter it from family pressures, and re-investment of incomes to stabilize overall earnings over time, in order to ensure their livelihoods and those of their families. These strategies question the assumption of fungibility of incomes and the neutrality of increasing or regulating one rather than another of them. Together, our findings on earning and income use patterns have important policy implications for how we go about (re)thinking financial incentive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK ReBUILD Research Consortium
| | - Mylene Lagarde
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bertone MP, Lagarde M, Witter S. Performance-based financing in the context of the complex remuneration of health workers: findings from a mixed-method study in rural Sierra Leone. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:286. [PMID: 27435164 PMCID: PMC4952280 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1546-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is growing interest on the impact of performance-based financing (PBF) on health workers’ motivation and performance. However, the literature so far tends to look at PBF payments in isolation, without reference to the overall remuneration of health workers. Taking the case of Sierra Leone, where PBF was introduced in 2011, this study investigates the absolute and relative contribution of PBF to health workers’ income and explores their views on PBF bonuses, in comparison to and interaction with other incomes. Methods The study is based on a mixed-methods research consisting in a survey and an 8-week longitudinal logbook collecting data on the incomes of primary health workers (n = 266) and 39 in-depth interviews with a subsample of the same workers, carried out in three districts of Sierra Leone (Bo, Kenema and Moyamba). Results Our results show that in this setting PBF contributes about 10 % of the total income of health workers. Despite this relatively low contribution, their views on the bonuses are positive, especially compared to the negative views on salary. We find that this is because PBF is seen as a complement, with less sense of entitlement compared to the official salary. Moreover, PBF has a specific role within the income utilization strategies enacted by health workers, as it provides extra money which can be used for emergencies or reinvested in income generating activities. However, implementation issues with the PBF scheme, such as delays in payment and difficulties in access, cause a series of problems that limit the motivational effects of the incentives. Overall, staff still favor salary increases over increases in PBF. Conclusions The study confirms that the remuneration of health workers is complex and interrelated so that the different financial incentives cannot be examined independently from one. It also shows that the implementation of PBF schemes has an impact on the way it does or does not motivate health workers, and must be thoroughly researched in order to assess the impact of PBF. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1546-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,ReBUILD Consortium Affiliate, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mylene Lagarde
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD Consortium, IIHD, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bertone MP, Lurton G, Mutombo PB. Investigating the remuneration of health workers in the DR Congo: implications for the health workforce and the health system in a fragile setting. Health Policy Plan 2016; 31:1143-51. [PMID: 26758540 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czv131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The financial remuneration of health workers (HWs) is a key concern to address human resources for health challenges. In low-income settings, the exploration of the sources of income available to HWs, their determinants and the livelihoods strategies that those remunerations entail are essential to gain a better understanding of the motivation of the workers and the effects on their performance and on service provision. This is even more relevant in a setting such as the DR Congo, characterized by the inability of the state to provide public services via a well-supported and financed public workforce. Based on a quantitative survey of 1771 HWs in four provinces of the DR Congo, this article looks at the level and the relative importance of each revenue. It finds that Congolese HWs earn their living from a variety of sources and enact different strategies for their financial survival. The main income is represented by the share of user fees for those employed in facilities, and per diems and top-ups from external agencies for those in Health Zone Management Teams (in both cases, with the exception of doctors), while governmental allowances are less relevant. The determinants at individual and facility level of the total income are also modelled, revealing that the distribution of most revenues systematically favours those working in already favourable conditions (urban facilities, administrative positions and positions of authority within facilities). This may impact negatively on the motivation and performance of HWs and on their distribution patters. Finally, our analysis highlights that, as health financing and health workforce reforms modify the livelihood opportunities of HWs, their design and implementation go beyond technical aspects and are unavoidably political. A better consideration of these issues is necessary to propose contextually grounded and politically savvy approaches to reform in the DR Congo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grégoire Lurton
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, 2301 5th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98121, USA and
| | - Paulin Beya Mutombo
- Ecole De Santé Publique, Université De Kinshasa, Kinshasa, BP 11850 Kin I, DR Congo
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bertone MP, Witter S. An exploration of the political economy dynamics shaping health worker incentives in three districts in Sierra Leone. Soc Sci Med 2015; 141:56-63. [PMID: 26248305 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2015] [Accepted: 07/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The need for evidence-based practice calls for research focussing not only on the effectiveness of interventions and their translation into policies, but also on implementation processes and the factors influencing them, in particular for complex health system policies. In this paper, we use the lens of one of the health system's 'building blocks', human resources for health (HRH), to examine the implementation of official policies on HRH incentives and the emergence of informal practices in three districts of Sierra Leone. Our mixed-methods research draws mostly from 18 key informant interviews at district level. Data are organised using a political economy framework which focuses on the dynamic interactions between structure (context, historical legacies, institutions) and agency (actors, agendas, power relations) to show how these elements affect the HRH incentive practices in each district. It appears that the official policies are re-shaped both by implementation challenges and by informal practices emerging at local level as the result of the district-level dynamics and negotiations between District Health Management Teams (DHMTs) and nongovernmental organisations (NGOs). Emerging informal practices take the form of selective supervision, salary supplementations and per diems paid to health workers, and aim to ensure a better fit between the actors' agendas and the incentive package. Importantly, the negotiations which shape such practices are characterised by a substantial asymmetry of power between DHMTs and NGOs. In conclusion, our findings reveal the influence of NGOs on the HRH incentive package and highlight the need to empower DHMTs to limit the discrepancy between policies defined at central level and practices in the districts, and to reduce inequalities in health worker remuneration across districts. For Sierra Leone, these findings are now more relevant than ever as new players enter the stage at district level, as part of the Ebola response and post-Ebola reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- ReBUILD Consortium, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD Consortium, IIHD, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bertone MP, Witter S. The complex remuneration of human resources for health in low-income settings: policy implications and a research agenda for designing effective financial incentives. Hum Resour Health 2015; 13:62. [PMID: 26215040 PMCID: PMC4517656 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-015-0058-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 07/09/2015] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human resources for health represent an essential component of health systems and play a key role to accelerate progress towards universal health coverage. Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa face challenges regarding the availability, distribution and performance of health workers, which could be in part addressed by providing effective financial incentives. METHODS Based on an overview of the existing literature, the paper highlights the gaps in the existing research in low-income countries exploring the different components of health workers' incomes. It then proposes a novel approach to the analysis of financial incentives and delineates a research agenda, which could contribute to shed light on this topic. FINDINGS The article finds that, while there is ample research that investigates separately each of the incomes health workers may earn (for example, salary, fee-for-service payments, informal incomes, "top-ups" and per diems, dual practice and non-health activities), there is a dearth of studies which look at the health workers' "complex remuneration", that is, the whole of the financial incentives available. Little research exists which analyses simultaneously all revenues of health workers, quantifies the overall remuneration and explores its complexity, its multiple components and their features, as well as the possible interaction between income components. However, such a comprehensive approach is essential to fully comprehend health workers' incentives, by investigating the causes (at individual and system level) of the fragmentation in the income structure and the variability in income levels, as well as the consequences of the "complex remuneration" on motivation and performance. This proposition has important policy implications in terms of devising effective incentive packages as it calls for an active consideration of the role that "complex remuneration" plays in determining recruitment, retention and motivation patterns, as well as, more broadly, the performance of health systems. CONCLUSIONS This paper argues that research focusing on the health workers' "complex remuneration" is critical to address some of the most challenging issues affecting human resources for health. An empirical research agenda is proposed to fill the gap in our understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- ReBUILD consortium, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
- ReBUILD Consortium, IIHD, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD Consortium, IIHD, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Witter S, Falisse JB, Bertone MP, Alonso-Garbayo A, Martins JS, Salehi AS, Pavignani E, Martineau T. State-building and human resources for health in fragile and conflict-affected states: exploring the linkages. Hum Resour Health 2015; 13:33. [PMID: 25971407 PMCID: PMC4488955 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-015-0023-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/25/2015] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human resources for health are self-evidently critical to running a health service and system. There is, however, a wider set of social issues which is more rarely considered. One area which is hinted at in literature, particularly on fragile and conflict-affected states, but rarely examined in detail, is the contribution which health staff may or do play in relation to the wider state-building processes. This article aims to explore that relationship, developing a conceptual framework to understand what linkages might exist and looking for empirical evidence in the literature to support, refute or adapt those linkages. METHODS An open call for contributions to the article was launched through an online community. The group then developed a conceptual framework and explored a variety of literatures (political, economic, historical, public administration, conflict and health-related) to find theoretical and empirical evidence related to the linkages outlined in the framework. Three country case reports were also developed for Afghanistan, Burundi and Timor-Leste, using secondary sources and the knowledge of the group. FINDINGS We find that the empirical evidence for most of the linkages is not strong, which is not surprising, given the complexity of the relationships. Nevertheless, some of the posited relationships are plausible, especially between development of health cadres and a strengthened public administration, which in the long run underlies a number of state-building features. The reintegration of factional health staff post-conflict is also plausibly linked to reconciliation and peace-building. The role of medical staff as part of national elites may also be important. CONCLUSIONS The concept of state-building itself is highly contested, with a rich vein of scepticism about the wisdom or feasibility of this as an external project. While recognizing the inherently political nature of these processes, systems and sub-systems, it remains the case that state-building does occur over time, driven by a combination of internal and external forces and that understanding the role played in it by the health system and health staff, particularly after conflicts and in fragile settings, is an area worth further investigation. This review and framework contribute to that debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD Programme, Institute for International Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Jean-Benoit Falisse
- Department of International Development & St Antony's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Maria Paola Bertone
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine & ReBUILD Programme, London, UK.
| | | | - João S Martins
- Faculdade de Medicina e Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosa'e, Dili, Timor-Leste.
| | - Ahmad Shah Salehi
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) & Health Economics and Financing Directorate, Ministry of Public Health, Kabul, Afghanistan.
| | - Enrico Pavignani
- The School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Tim Martineau
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
There is an acknowledged gap in the literature on the impact of fee exemption policies on health staff, and, conversely, the implications of staffing for fee exemption. This article draws from five research tools used to analyse changing health worker policies and incentives in post-war Sierra Leone to document the effects of the Free Health Care Initiative (FHCI) of 2010 on health workers. Data were collected through document review (57 documents fully reviewed, published and grey); key informant interviews (23 with government, donors, NGO staff and consultants); analysis of human resource data held by the MoHS; in-depth interviews with health workers (23 doctors, nurses, mid-wives and community health officers); and a health worker survey (312 participants, including all main cadres). The article traces the HR reforms which were triggered by the FHCI and evidence of their effects, which include substantial increases in number and pay (particularly for higher cadres), as well as a reported reduction in absenteeism and attrition, and an increase (at least for some areas, where data is available) in outputs per health worker. The findings highlight how a flagship policy, combined with high profile support and financial and technical resources, can galvanize systemic changes. In this regard, the story of Sierra Leone differs from many countries introducing fee exemptions, where fee exemption has been a stand-alone programme, unconnected to wider health system reforms. The challenge will be sustaining the momentum and the attention to delivering results as the FHCI ceases to be an initiative and becomes just ‘business as normal’. The health system in Sierra Leone was fragile and conflict-affected prior to the FHCI and still faces significant challenges, both in human resources for health and more widely, as vividly evidenced by the current Ebola crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD/IIHD, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Scotland,
| | - Haja Wurie
- ReBUILD programme, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Freetown, Sierra Leone and
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bertone MP, Samai M, Edem-Hotah J, Witter S. A window of opportunity for reform in post-conflict settings? The case of Human Resources for Health policies in Sierra Leone, 2002-2012. Confl Health 2014; 8:11. [PMID: 25075212 PMCID: PMC4114084 DOI: 10.1186/1752-1505-8-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2014] [Accepted: 06/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is recognized that decisions taken in the early recovery period may affect the development of health systems. Additionally, some suggest that the immediate post-conflict period may allow for the opening of a political 'window of opportunity' for reform. For these reasons, it is useful to reflect on the policy space that exists in this period, by what it is shaped, how decisions are made, and what are their long-term implications. Examining the policy trajectory and its determinants can be helpful to explore the specific features of the post-conflict policy-making environment. With this aim, the study looks at the development of policies on human resources for health (HRH) in Sierra Leone over the decade after the conflict (2002-2012). METHODS Multiple sources were used to collect qualitative data on the period between 2002 and 2012: a stakeholder mapping workshop, a document review and a series of key informant interviews. The analysis draws from political economy and policy analysis tools, focusing on the drivers of reform, the processes, the contextual features, and the actors and agendas. FINDINGS Our findings identify three stages of policy-making. At first characterized by political uncertainty, incremental policies and stop-gap measures, the context substantially changed in 2009. The launch of the Free Health Care Initiative provided to be an instrumental event and catalyst for health system, and HRH, reform. However, after the launch of the initiative, the pace of HRH decision-making again slowed down. CONCLUSIONS OUR STUDY IDENTIFIES THE KEY DRIVERS OF HRH POLICY TRAJECTORY IN SIERRA LEONE: (i) the political situation, at first uncertain and later on more defined; (ii) the availability of funding and the stances of agencies providing such funds; (iii) the sense of need for radical change - which is perhaps the only element related to the post-conflict setting. It also emerges that a 'windows of opportunity' for reform did not open in the immediate post-conflict, but rather 8 years later when the Free Health Care Initiative was announced, thus making it difficult to link it directly to the features of the post-conflict policy-making environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- ReBUILD Consortium & Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mohamed Samai
- ReBUILD Consortium, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Joseph Edem-Hotah
- ReBUILD Consortium, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Sophie Witter
- ReBUILD Consortium, Reader, IIHD, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bertone MP. Financial incentives for human resources for health: What do we know? What do we do? The case of Sierra Leone. BMC Health Serv Res 2014. [PMCID: PMC4123149 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-s2-o22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
29
|
Bertone MP, Meessen B, Clarysse G, Hercot D, Kelley A, Kafando Y, Lange I, Pfaffmann J, Ridde V, Sieleunou I, Witter S. Assessing communities of practice in health policy: a conceptual framework as a first step towards empirical research. Health Res Policy Syst 2013; 11:39. [PMID: 24139662 PMCID: PMC3819672 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2013] [Accepted: 10/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Communities of Practice (CoPs) are groups of people that interact regularly to deepen their knowledge on a specific topic. Thanks to information and communication technologies, CoPs can involve experts distributed across countries and adopt a 'transnational' membership. This has allowed the strategy to be applied to domains of knowledge such as health policy with a global perspective. CoPs represent a potentially valuable tool for producing and sharing explicit knowledge, as well as tacit knowledge and implementation practices. They may also be effective in creating links among the different 'knowledge holders' contributing to health policy (e.g., researchers, policymakers, technical assistants, practitioners, etc.). CoPs in global health are growing in number and activities. As a result, there is an increasing need to document their progress and evaluate their effectiveness. This paper represents a first step towards such empirical research as it aims to provide a conceptual framework for the analysis and assessment of transnational CoPs in health policy.The framework is developed based on the findings of a literature review as well as on our experience, and reflects the specific features and challenges of transnational CoPs in health policy. It organizes the key elements of CoPs into a logical flow that links available resources and the capacity to mobilize them, with knowledge management activities and the expansion of knowledge, with changes in policy and practice and, ultimately, with an improvement in health outcomes. Additionally, the paper addresses the challenges in the operationalization and empirical application of the framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Bertone
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Bruno Meessen
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium
- Facilitator of one of the Harmonization for Health in Africa Communities of Practice
| | - Guy Clarysse
- UNICEF West and Central Africa Regional Office (WCARO)BP 29720, Dakar-Yoff, Senegal
| | - David Hercot
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium
- Facilitator of one of the Harmonization for Health in Africa Communities of Practice
| | - Allison Kelley
- Facilitator of one of the Harmonization for Health in Africa Communities of Practice
| | - Yamba Kafando
- Facilitator of one of the Harmonization for Health in Africa Communities of Practice
- Département de Santé Publique et de Biologie Médicale, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS)03 BP 7192, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Isabelle Lange
- Maternal and Neonatal Health Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Jérôme Pfaffmann
- UNICEF West and Central Africa Regional Office (WCARO)BP 29720, Dakar-Yoff, Senegal
| | - Valéry Ridde
- Département de Santé Publique et de Biologie Médicale, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS)03 BP 7192, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM)Tour Saint-Antoine, 850 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Isidore Sieleunou
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium
- Facilitator of one of the Harmonization for Health in Africa Communities of Practice
| | - Sophie Witter
- FEMHealth project coordinator, Immpact, University of Aberdeen, 2nd Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
In May 2006, the President of Burundi announced the removal of user fees in all health centres and hospitals for children under 5 and women giving birth. As other studies also point out, the policy was adopted extremely suddenly, without much reflection on its ultimate aims and on the operational dimension of its implementation. From the perspective of a frontline manager, this paper provides a descriptive case study of the abolition of user fees in the Muramvya District and a first-hand account of the effects of the sudden reform in the management of a district and a district hospital. The analysis highlights the challenges that the district and hospital teams faced. The main issues were: the reduction of financial flows, which prevented the possibility of investments and caused frequent drugs stock-outs; the reduced quality of the services and the disruption of the referral system; the motivation of the health staff who saw the administrative workload increase (not necessarily because of increased utilization) and faced 'ethical dilemmas' caused by the imprecise targeting of the reform. Undoubtedly, the removal of user fees for certain groups was an equitable and necessary measure in an extremely poor country such as Burundi. However, the suddenness of the decision and the lack of preparation had critical and long-lasting consequences for the entire health system. This analysis, performed from the frontline perspective, clarifies the importance of a rigorous planning of any reform, as well as of involving peripheral actors and understanding the complex challenges that they face.
Collapse
|