1
|
Demissie DB, Molla G, Tiruneh Tiyare F, Badacho AS, Tadele A. Magnitude, disparity, and predictors of poor-quality antenatal care service: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med 2024; 12:20503121241248275. [PMID: 38737837 PMCID: PMC11085007 DOI: 10.1177/20503121241248275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Antenatal care is directed toward ensuring healthy pregnancy outcomes. Quality antenatal care increases the likelihood of receiving an effective intervention to maintain maternal, fetal, and neonatal well-being, while poor quality is linked to poor pregnancy outcomes. However, owing to the complex nature of quality, researchers have followed several approaches to systematically measure it. The evidence from these variable approaches appears inconsistence and poses challenges to programmers and policymakers. Hence, it is imperative to obtain a pooled estimate of the quality of antenatal care. Therefore, considering the scarcity of evidence on the quality of antenatal care, this study aimed to review, synthesize, and bring pooled estimates of accessible evidence. Objective This study aimed to estimate the pooled magnitude and predictors of quality of antenatal care services and compare regional disparity. Method We conducted a comprehensive systematic three-step approach search of published and unpublished sources from 2002 to 2022. The methodological quality of eligible studies was checked using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. Meta-analysis was carried out using STATA version 16. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test. In the presence of moderate heterogeneity (I2 more than 50%), sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted and presented in a forest plot. Effect size was reported using standardized mean difference and its 95% confidence interval. Funnel plots and Egger's regression test were used to measure publication bias at the 5% significance level. A trim-and-fill analysis was conducted to adjust for publication bias. Pooled estimates were computed using random-effects models and weighted using the inverse variance method in the presence of high heterogeneity among studies. A 95% CI and 5% significance level were considered to declare significance variables. Results The global pooled poor-quality antenatal care was 64.28% (95% CI: 59.58%-68.98%) (I2 = 99.97%, p = 0.001). The identified pooled predictors of good-quality antenatal care service were: number of antenatal care visits (fourth and above antenatal care visit) (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.37-3.84), family wealth index (AOR = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.89-3.55), maternal education attainment (AOR = 3.03, 95% CI: 2.24-3.82), residence (urban dwellers) (AOR = 4.06, 95% CI: 0.95-7.17), and confidentiality antenatal care (AOR = 2.23, 95% CI: -0.36 to -4.82). Conclusions The study found regional and country-level disparities in the quality of antenatal care services for pregnant women, where poor-quality antenatal care services were provided for more than two-thirds to three-fourths of antenatal care attendants. Therefore, policymakers and health planners should put a great deal of emphasis on addressing the quality of antenatal care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dereje Bayissa Demissie
- Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- St Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Gebeyaw Molla
- Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Firew Tiruneh Tiyare
- Faculty of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | | | - Ashenif Tadele
- Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Assessing Community Acceptance of Maternal Immunisation in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A Qualitative Investigation. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10030415. [PMID: 35335047 PMCID: PMC8951159 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10030415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the significant benefits of maternal immunisation, uptake remains low in many parts of the world. In this qualitative study, we aimed to assess the factors that influence pregnant women’s decision to engage with maternal immunisation in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We conducted in-depth interviews with a total of 28 purposively sampled pregnant women and key informants using semi-structured topic guides. Data analysis was conducted using a modified Health Belief Model framework that included constructs of barriers to action, modifying factors of cue to action and perceived social norms. The findings show that traditional customs and institutional barriers such as low-quality health service delivery, long queues, and distance to the health facilities, immunisation vaccine stockouts and low levels of maternal knowledge influence the choice and decision to engage with maternal immunisation. Understanding health-related behaviours and addressing barriers to care is important in facilitating vaccination uptake. This study contributes to the understanding of maternal immunisation uptake in low-resource settings.
Collapse
|
3
|
Gareta D, Baisley K, Mngomezulu T, Smit T, Khoza T, Nxumalo S, Dreyer J, Dube S, Majozi N, Ording-Jesperson G, Ehlers E, Harling G, Shahmanesh M, Siedner M, Hanekom W, Herbst K. Cohort Profile Update: Africa Centre Demographic Information System (ACDIS) and population-based HIV survey. Int J Epidemiol 2021; 50:33-34. [PMID: 33437994 PMCID: PMC7938501 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dickman Gareta
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Kathy Baisley
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| | | | - Theresa Smit
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Thandeka Khoza
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | | | - Jaco Dreyer
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Sweetness Dube
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | | | | | - Eugene Ehlers
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Guy Harling
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.,MRC/Wits Rural Public Health & Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Department of Epidemiology & Harvard Centre for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maryam Shahmanesh
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Siedner
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Willem Hanekom
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Kobus Herbst
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,SAPRIN, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yapa HM, De Neve JW, Chetty T, Herbst C, Post FA, Jiamsakul A, Geldsetzer P, Harling G, Dhlomo-Mphatswe W, Moshabela M, Matthews P, Ogbuoji O, Tanser F, Gareta D, Herbst K, Pillay D, Wyke S, Bärnighausen T. The impact of continuous quality improvement on coverage of antenatal HIV care tests in rural South Africa: Results of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled implementation trial. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003150. [PMID: 33027246 PMCID: PMC7540892 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for the effectiveness of continuous quality improvement (CQI) in resource-poor settings is very limited. We aimed to establish the effects of CQI on quality of antenatal HIV care in primary care clinics in rural South Africa. METHODS AND FINDINGS We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing CQI to usual standard of antenatal care (ANC) in 7 nurse-led, public-sector primary care clinics-combined into 6 clusters-over 8 steps and 19 months. Clusters randomly switched from comparator to intervention on pre-specified dates until all had rolled over to the CQI intervention. Investigators and clusters were blinded to randomisation until 2 weeks prior to each step. The intervention was delivered by trained CQI mentors and included standard CQI tools (process maps, fishbone diagrams, run charts, Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] cycles, and action learning sessions). CQI mentors worked with health workers, including nurses and HIV lay counsellors. The mentors used the standard CQI tools flexibly, tailored to local clinic needs. Health workers were the direct recipients of the intervention, whereas the ultimate beneficiaries were pregnant women attending ANC. Our 2 registered primary endpoints were viral load (VL) monitoring (which is critical for elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV [eMTCT] and the health of pregnant women living with HIV) and repeat HIV testing (which is necessary to identify and treat women who seroconvert during pregnancy). All pregnant women who attended their first antenatal visit at one of the 7 study clinics and were ≥18 years old at delivery were eligible for endpoint assessment. We performed intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses using modified Poisson generalised linear mixed effects models. We estimated effect sizes with time-step fixed effects and clinic random effects (Model 1). In separate models, we added a nested random clinic-time step interaction term (Model 2) or individual random effects (Model 3). Between 15 July 2015 and 30 January 2017, 2,160 participants with 13,212 ANC visits (intervention n = 6,877, control n = 6,335) were eligible for ITT analysis. No adverse events were reported. Median age at first booking was 25 years (interquartile range [IQR] 21 to 30), and median parity was 1 (IQR 0 to 2). HIV prevalence was 47% (95% CI 42% to 53%). In Model 1, CQI significantly increased VL monitoring (relative risk [RR] 1.38, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.57, p < 0.001) but did not improve repeat HIV testing (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.13, p = 0.958). These results remained essentially the same in both Model 2 and Model 3. Limitations of our study include that we did not establish impact beyond the duration of the relatively short study period of 19 months, and that transition steps may have been too short to achieve the full potential impact of the CQI intervention. CONCLUSIONS We found that CQI can be effective at increasing quality of primary care in rural Africa. Policy makers should consider CQI as a routine intervention to boost quality of primary care in rural African communities. Implementation research should accompany future CQI use to elucidate mechanisms of action and to identify factors supporting long-term success. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT02626351.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Manisha Yapa
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- * E-mail:
| | - Jan-Walter De Neve
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Terusha Chetty
- Health systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa
| | - Carina Herbst
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Frank A. Post
- King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Awachana Jiamsakul
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Pascal Geldsetzer
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Guy Harling
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wendy Dhlomo-Mphatswe
- School of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Mosa Moshabela
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Philippa Matthews
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- Islington GP Federation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Osondu Ogbuoji
- Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Frank Tanser
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Dickman Gareta
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Kobus Herbst
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Deenan Pillay
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Wyke
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- Institute for Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yapa HM, Drayne R, Klein N, De Neve JW, Petoumenos K, Jiamsakul A, Herbst C, Pillay D, Post FA, Bärnighausen T. Infant feeding knowledge and practice vary by maternal HIV status: a nested cohort study in rural South Africa. Int Breastfeed J 2020; 15:77. [PMID: 32873311 PMCID: PMC7466779 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-020-00317-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We investigate whether correct infant feeding knowledge and practice differ by maternal HIV status in an era of evolving clinical guidelines in rural South Africa. Methods This cohort study was nested within the MONARCH stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial (www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02626351) which tested the impact of continuous quality improvement on antenatal care quality at seven primary care clinics in KwaZulu-Natal, from July 2015 to January 2017. Women aged ≥18 years at delivery were followed up to 6 weeks postpartum. Clinical data were sourced from routine medical records at delivery. Structured interviews at early postnatal visits and the 6-week postnatal immunisation visit provided data on infant feeding knowledge and feeding practices respectively. We measured the relationship between maternal HIV status and (i) correct infant feeding knowledge at the early postnatal visit; and (ii) infant feeding practice at 6 weeks, using Poisson and multinomial regression models, respectively. Results We analysed data from 1693 women with early postnatal and 471 with 6-week postnatal interviews. HIV prevalence was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42, 52%). Women living with HIV were more knowledgeable than women not living with HIV on correct infant feeding recommendations (adjusted risk ratio, aRR, 1.08, p < 0.001). More women living with HIV (33%; 95% CI 26, 41%) were not breastfeeding than women not living with HIV (15%; 95% CI 11, 21%). However, among women who were currently breastfeeding their infants, fewer women living with HIV (5%; 95% CI 2, 9%) mixed fed their babies than women not living with HIV (21%; 95% CI 14, 32%). In adjusted analyses, women living with HIV were more likely to avoid breastfeeding (adjusted relative risk ratio, aRRR, 2.78, p < 0.001) and less likely to mixed feed (aRRR 0.22, p < 0.001) than women not living with HIV. Conclusions Many mothers in rural South Africa still do not practice exclusive breastfeeding. Women living with HIV were more knowledgeable but had lower overall uptake of breastfeeding, compared with women not living with HIV. Women living with HIV were also more likely to practice exclusive breastfeeding over mixed feeding if currently breastfeeding. Improved approaches are needed to increase awareness of correct infant feeding and exclusive breastfeeding uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Manisha Yapa
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia. .,Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
| | - Róisín Drayne
- School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nigel Klein
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Jan-Walter De Neve
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kathy Petoumenos
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Awachana Jiamsakul
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carina Herbst
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Deenan Pillay
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Frank A Post
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.,Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ndwandwe D, Nnaji CA, Mashunye T, Uthman OA, Wiysonge CS. Incomplete vaccination and associated factors among children aged 12-23 months in South Africa: an analysis of the South African demographic and health survey 2016. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 17:247-254. [PMID: 32703070 PMCID: PMC7872074 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1791509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Socioeconomic and health inequalities remain a huge problem in post-apartheid South Africa. Despite substantial efforts at ensuring universal access to vaccines, many children remain under-vaccinated in the country. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors associated with incomplete vaccination in the first year of life, among children aged 12–23 months in South Africa. Methods The study is a secondary analysis of the 2016 South African Demographic and Health Survey. A multivariable logistic regression model was applied to the data on 708 children aged 12–23 months. The study outcome, vaccination completeness, was assessed using a composite assessment of nine doses of four vaccines; Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) (one dose), Polio (four doses), diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis containing vaccines (DTP) (three doses) and measles-containing vaccines (MCV) (one dose). Children who received all the nine doses were categorized as completely vaccinated. Independent variables included child, maternal, and demographic characteristics. Variables were included in the model based on literature findings. Bivariate analyses were used to examine the crude association between each independent variable and incomplete vaccination, while the multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the adjusted association after controlling for other variables. Measures of association were presented as odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results About two-fifths (40.8%) of the children were incompletely vaccinated. The prevalence of incomplete vaccination was significantly high among children whose mothers did not receive antenatal care (ANC) during pregnancy (57.5%), and children living in Gauteng Province (52.2%). From the bivariate analyses, the odds of being incompletely vaccinated were three times higher in children whose mothers did not attend ANC compared with children whose mothers attended ANC (crude OR = 2.93; 95% CI 1.42–6.03). The odds were about three times higher in children living in Mpumalanga province (OR = 2.58; 95% CI 1.27–5.25) and in those living in Gauteng province (OR = 2.76; 95% CI 1.30–5.91), compared with those living in Free State province. Conversely, the odds were 32% lower in children from rich households, compared with those from poor households (OR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.47–0.98). In the adjusted model, the higher odds of incomplete vaccination in children whose mothers did not attend ANC were maintained in both magnitude and direction (adjusted OR [aOR] = 2.87; 95% CI 1.31–6.25). Similarly, compared with children living in Free State province, the higher odds of a child being incompletely vaccinated in Mpumalanga (aOR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.03–5.14) and in Gauteng (aOR = 3.10; 95% CI 1.35–7.15) provinces were maintained in both magnitude and direction. Conclusions There is a substantial burden of incomplete childhood vaccination in South Africa. Maternal ANC attendance during pregnancy and area of residence significantly influences this burden. Interventions that promote broader health service utilization, such as ANC attendance, can help improve the awareness and uptake of routine childhood vaccination. It is also imperative to take into consideration the provincial disparities in childhood vaccination completeness, in planning and implementing interventions to improve vaccination coverage in the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duduzile Ndwandwe
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council , Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Chukwudi A Nnaji
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council , Cape Town, South Africa.,School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Thandiwe Mashunye
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council , Cape Town, South Africa.,School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Olalekan A Uthman
- Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), University of Warwick Medical School , Coventry, UK.,Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stellenbosch University , Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Charles S Wiysonge
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council , Cape Town, South Africa.,School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa.,Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stellenbosch University , Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|