1
|
Forstner J, Mangold J, Litke N, Weis A, Szecsenyi J, Wensing M, Ullrich C. [Between New Responsibility and Daily Routines - The Role of the VERAH in GP Care: A Qualitative Secondary Data Case Study of the Introduction of Software-Based Case Management]. DAS GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2023; 85:1124-1130. [PMID: 37852278 PMCID: PMC10713334 DOI: 10.1055/a-2144-5767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of Care Assistant in General Practice (VERAH) was developed in order to integrate non-medical staff more strongly into primary care and thus to meet the increasing demand for care and the simultaneous shortage of medical staff. VERAHs are increasingly responsible for software-supported case management and are thus confronted with new tasks. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the role of the VERAH in primary care practices. METHODS The present study is a qualitative secondary data analysis; the data collection took place within the projects VESPEERA and TelePraCMan. Twenty individual interviews and two focus group meetings were conducted with a total of 30 physicians, VERAHs and medical assistants from primary care. The data were analysed qualitatively according to Emerson. Contextual and socio-demographic data were collected with an accompanying questionnaire. RESULTS The VERAHs of all primary care practices from which interview partners participated performed tasks within software-supported case management. Concerning the role of the VERAH, three themes were identified in the interviews: a) concrete tasks of the VERAH in software-supported case management within the practice team, b) relevance of software-supported case management within the activities of the VERAHS and c) relationship between VERAHs and patients. CONCLUSION Taking over tasks in software-supported case management can contribute to strengthening and expanding the role of the VERAH. In the future, more attention should be paid to a clear description of the new role, and the conditions of the VERAHs' task fulfilment should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Forstner
- Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung,
UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jasmin Mangold
- Institut für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Abteilung
Pflegewissenschaft, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen,
Tübingen, Germany
- Zentrum für öffentliches Gesundheitswesen und
Versorgungsforschung (ZÖGV), Universitätsklinikum
Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicola Litke
- Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung,
UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aline Weis
- Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung,
UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung,
UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung,
UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Charlotte Ullrich
- Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung,
UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hospital Admission and Discharge: Lessons Learned from a Large Programme in Southwest Germany. Int J Integr Care 2023; 23:4. [PMID: 36741970 PMCID: PMC9881439 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In the context of a GP-based care programme, we implemented an admission, discharge and follow-up programme. Description The VESPEERA programme consists of three sets of components: pre-admission interventions, in-hospital interventions and post-discharge interventions. It was aimed at all patients with a hospital stay participating in the GP-based care programme and was implemented in 7 hospitals and 72 general practices in southwest Germany using a range of strategies. Its' effectiveness was evaluated using readmissions within 90 days after discharge as primary outcome. Questionnaires with staff were used to explore the implementation process. Discussion A statistically significant effect was not found, but the effect size was similar to other interventions. Intervention fidelity was low and contextual factors affecting the implementation, amongst others, were available resources, external requirements such as legal regulations and networking between care providers. Lessons learned were derived that can aid to inform future political or scientific initiatives. Conclusion Structured information transfer at hospital admission and discharge makes sense but the added value in the context of a GP-based programme seems modest. Primary care teams should be involved in pre- and post-hospital care.
Collapse
|
3
|
Forstner J, Litke N, Weis A, Straßner C, Szecsenyi J, Wensing M. How to fall into a new routine: factors influencing the implementation of an admission and discharge programme in hospitals and general practices. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1289. [PMID: 36284324 PMCID: PMC9598008 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08644-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The VESPEERA programme is a multifaceted programme to enhance information transfer between general practice and hospital across the process of hospital admission, stay and discharge. It was implemented in 7 hospitals and 72 general practices in Southern Germany. Uptake was heterogeneous and overall low. A process evaluation aimed at identifying factors associated with the implementation of the VESPEERA programme. METHODS This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews in a purposeful sample of health workers in hospitals and general practices in the VESPEERA programme. Qualitative framework analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was performed and revealed the topic of previous and new routines to be protruding. Inductive content analysis was used for in-depth examination of stages in the process of staying in a previous or falling into a new routines. RESULTS Thirty-six interviews were conducted with 17 participants from general practices and 19 participants from hospitals. The interviewees were in different stages of the implementation process at the time of the interviews. Four stages were identified: Stage 1,'Previous routine and tension for change', describes the situation in which VESPEERA was to be implemented and the factors leading to the decision to participate. In stage 2,'Adoption of the VESPEERA programme', factors that influenced whether individuals decided to employ the innovation are relevant. Stage 3 comprises 'Determinants for falling into and staying in the new VESPEERA-routine' relates to actual implementation and finally, in stage 4, the participants reflect on the success of the implementation. CONCLUSIONS The individuals and organisations participating in the VESPEERA programme were in different stages of a process from the previous to the new routine, which were characterised by different determinants of implementation. In all stages, organisational factors were main determinants of implementation, but different factors emerged in different implementation stages. A low distinction between decision-making power and executive, as well as available resources, were beneficial for the implementation of the innovation. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS00015183 on DRKS / Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1218-0992.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Forstner
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, D-69120 Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Nicola Litke
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, D-69120 Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Aline Weis
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, D-69120 Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Cornelia Straßner
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, D-69120 Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, D-69120 Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, D-69120 Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spencer RA, Singh Punia H. A scoping review of communication tools applicable to patients and their primary care providers after discharge from hospital. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:1681-1703. [PMID: 33446366 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transitions from hospital to home are high-risk episodes. Communication problems between patients/carers and their primary healthcare providers are a central part of the risk. This literature review aimed to identify any existing tools or information (including secondary care instruments) that would facilitate designing new communication instruments for primary care to manage and mitigate risk at discharge. METHOD Five databases (Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science and Cochrane) were searched using a three stem approach (primary/transitional care, discharge period, communication). A dual reviewer system was used, following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS From 61 full text articles a total of ten tools were found, 25 articles contained other useful content, 19 further tools were found in grey literature. Most material originated from the USA and described hospital-based transitional care interventions. CONCLUSION No ready-made patient/provider communication tool for the post-discharge period in primary care was found. Future communication tools should enhance education and engagement of patients so they feel able to initiate communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Collating post-discharge communication material is of importance to improving the safety of care transitions and will enable creation of new tools specifically designed for primary care. These tools will improve patient activation ('the knowledge, skills and confidence a person has in managing their own health and care') with the ultimate aim of reducing error and harm in primary care through improved communication of healthcare decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Ann Spencer
- Unit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
| | - Harjot Singh Punia
- Unit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Forstner J, Bossert J, Weis A, Litke N, Strassner C, Szecsenyi J, Wensing M. The role of personalised professional relations across care sectors in achieving high continuity of care. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:72. [PMID: 33849453 PMCID: PMC8045382 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01418-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Background High continuity of care has a positive impact on health outcomes, but insight into the mechanisms underlying this impact is limited. Information continuity, on which our study focuses, is especially important when relational continuity is not given, which is often the case at hospital admission or hospital discharge. The aim of this study is to provide insight into the information flows between general practices and hospitals in Germany, and to identify factors associated with these flows of information. Methods This is a qualitative interview study in a purposeful sample of staff from hospitals and general practices (general practitioners, care assistants in general practice, hospital management, hospital physicians, and nursing staff). Interviews were conducted via telephone or face-to-face using a self-developed semi-structured interview guide. Stepwise systematic content analysis was used to structure collected material into themes and sub-themes that related to the study aim. Data was analysed by two researchers in several cycles, alternating between inductive and deductive approaches. Results A total of 49 interviews were conducted. Duration of the interviews varies between 21 and 78 min (mean duration 43 min). Across all groups, more than two thirds of participants were female (n = 34, 69%). The analysis highlighted six interdependent main themes regarding factors that affect information flows between hospitals and general practices: organisational, legal, financial, patient factors, individual characteristics, and emotional & social factors. The latter theme emerged as particularly rich and was therefore divided into four subthemes: appreciation and understanding of the respective other, (intrinsic) motivation, socialisation, and relationships. Organised meetings and events were mentioned as strategies to address emotional and social factors. Conclusions Digitalisation can facilitate information flows between care providers. However, knowing each other and good personal relations remain important for effective collaboration. Cooperation between all stakeholders is needed to aim to achieve continuity of care. Trial registration: DRKS00015183 on DRKS/ Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1218–0992. Date of registration 23/08/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Forstner
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jasmin Bossert
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aline Weis
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicola Litke
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Strassner
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Forstner J, Kunz A, Straßner C, Uhlmann L, Kuemmel S, Szecsenyi J, Wensing M. Improving continuity of patient care across sectors: study protocol of the process evaluation of a quasi-experimental multi-centre study regarding an admission and discharge model in Germany (VESPEERA). BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031245. [PMID: 31722944 PMCID: PMC6858220 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hospital stays are critical events as they often disrupt continuity of care. This process evaluation aims to describe and explore the implementation of the VESPEERA programme (Improving continuity of patient care across sectors: An admission and discharge model in general practices and hospitals, Versorgungskontinuitaet sichern: Patientenorientiertes Einweisungs- und Entlassmanagement in Hausarztpraxen und Krankenhauesern). The evaluation concerns the intervention fidelity, reach in targeted populations, perceived effects, working mechanisms, feasibility, determinants for implementation, including contextual factors, and associations with the outcomes evaluation. The aim of the VESPEERA programme is the development, implementation and evaluation of a structured admission and discharge programme in general practices and hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The process evaluation is linked to the VESPEERA outcomes evaluation, which has a quasi-experimental multi-centre design with four study arms and is conducted in hospitals and general practices in Germany. The VESPEERA programme comprises several components: an assessment before admission, an admission letter, a telephonic discharge conversation between hospital and general practice before discharge, discharge information for patients, structured planning of follow-up care after discharge in the general practice and a telephone monitoring for patients with a risk of rehospitalisation. The process evaluation has a mixed-methods design, incorporating interviews (patients, both care providers who do and do not participate in the VESPEERA programme, total n=75), questionnaires (patients and care providers who participate in the VESPEERA programme, total n=475), implementation plans of hospitals, data documented in general practices, claims-based data and hospital process data. Data analysis is descriptive and explorative. Qualitative data will be transcribed and analysed using framework analysis based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Associations between the outcomes of the program and measures in the process evaluation will be explored in regression models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been obtained by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty Heidelberg prior to the start of the study (S-352/2018). Results will be disseminated through a final report to the funding agency, articles in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER http://www.drks.de/DRKS00015183. TRIAL STATUS The study protocol on hand is the protocol V.1.1 from 18 June 2018. Recruitment for interviews started on 3 September 2018 and will approximately be completed by the end of May 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Forstner
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aline Kunz
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Straßner
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lorenz Uhlmann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|