1
|
Arnaout A, Mukhi S, Brehaut J, Davidson S, Fung Kee Fung M, Hebbard P, Hillis C, Leonard R, Mack LA, Mathieson A, Presseau J, Schaeffer D, Seely A, Stuart G, Tesch M, Westhuizen N, Earle C. Implementation and evaluation of a national quality improvement initiative in cancer surgery. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002759. [PMID: 38862236 PMCID: PMC11168180 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2017, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, a Canadian federally sponsored organisation, initiated a national multijurisdictional quality improvement (QI) initiative to maximise the use of synoptic data to drive cancer system improvements, known as the Evidence for Surgical Synoptic Quality Improvement Programme. The goal of our study was to evaluate the outcomes, determinants and learning of this nationally led initiative across six jurisdictions in Canada, integrating a mix of cancer surgery disease sites and clinicians. METHODS A mixed-methods evaluation (surveys, semistructured interviews and focus groups) of this initiative was focused on the ability of each jurisdiction to use synoptic reporting data to successfully implement and sustain QI projects to beyond the completion of the initiative and the lessons learnt in the process. Resources provided to the jurisdictions included operational funding, training in QI methodology, national forums, expert coaches, and ad hoc monitoring and support. The programme emphasised foundational concepts of the QI process including data literacy, audit and feedback reports, communities of practice (CoP) and positive deviance methodology. RESULTS 101 CoP meetings were held and 337 clinicians received feedback reports. There were 23 projects, and 22 of 23 (95%) showed improvements with 15 of 23 (65%) achieving the proposed targets. Enablers of effective data utilisation/feedback reports for QI included the need for clinicians to trust the data, have comparative data for feedback, and the engagement of both data scientists and clinicians in designing feedback reports. Enablers of sustainability of QI within each jurisdiction included QI training for clinicians, the ability to continue CoP meetings, executive and broad stakeholder engagement, and the ability to use pre-existing organisational infrastructures and processes. Barriers to continue QI work included lack of funding for core team members, lack of automated data collection processes and lack of clinician incentives (financial and other). CONCLUSION Success and sustainability in data-driven QI in cancer surgery require skills in QI methodology, data literacy and feedback, dedicated supportive personnel and an environment that promotes the process of collective learning and shared accountability. Building these capabilities in jurisdictional teams, tailoring interventions to facility contexts and strong leadership engagement will create the capacity for continued success in QI for cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Arnaout
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaheena Mukhi
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jamie Brehaut
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Davidson
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Robyn Leonard
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lloyd A Mack
- Oncology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alex Mathieson
- Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Justin Presseau
- Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Schaeffer
- Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew Seely
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gavin Stuart
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Marvin Tesch
- Prince Edward Island Department of Health and Wellness, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
| | | | - Craig Earle
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Määttä S, Petersson C, Gäre BA, Henriks G, Ånfors H, Lundberg C, Nilsagård Y. Experiences of co-producing person-centred and cohesive clinical pathways in the national system for knowledge-based management in Swedish healthcare: a qualitative study. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2024; 10:55. [PMID: 38849932 PMCID: PMC11157721 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00565-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When the 21 Swedish county councils decided to collaborate in the creation of a national system for knowledge-based management, patient participation was mandatory. Patient and next-of-kin representatives (PR) co-produced person-centred and cohesive clinical pathways together with healthcare professionals (HPR). Research on co-production in healthcare at the national level is scarce. The aim of this study is to explore experiences of patient participation from the perspectives of both PRs and HPRs when co-producing clinical pathways within the Swedish nationwide healthcare system for knowledge-based management. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted. A strategic sample of nine PRs and eight HPRs were interviewed individually between August 2022 and January 2023 using a semi-structured interview guide. We analysed data using an inductive content analysis. RESULTS Three main categories were identified: (1) Finding appropriate patient representativeness; (2) Working methods that facilitate a patient perspective; and (3) Influence of the patient perspective in the clinical pathways. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates the importance of patient and next-of-kin participation in the construction of clinical pathways at the national level. The results provide a platform for further research on patient participation on the national level and add to studies on if and how patient participation on this level has an impact on how the clinical pathways are put into practice at the micro level, and the support provided at the meso level. The study contributes to the growing body of literature studying patient participation and co-production. TRIAL REGISTRATION Region Örebro County ID 276,940. An advisory opinion was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2021-05899-01).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Määttä
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Christina Petersson
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Center for Learning and Innovation at Region Jönköping County, Sweden, Sweden.
| | - Boel Andersson Gäre
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Sweden and Futurum, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Göran Henriks
- Yerevan State University, Strategic Advisor Region Jönköping County, Yerevan, Sweden
| | - Henrik Ånfors
- Qulturum - Center for Learning and Innovation, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden
| | | | - Ylva Nilsagård
- University Healthcare Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Almeida D, Umuhire D, Gonzalez-Quevedo R, António A, Burgos JG, Verpillat P, Bere N, Sepodes B, Torre C. Leveraging patient experience data to guide medicines development, regulation, access decisions and clinical care in the EU. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1408636. [PMID: 38846141 PMCID: PMC11153762 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Patient experience data (PED), provided by patients/their carers without interpretation by clinicians, directly capture what matters more to patients on their medical condition, treatment and impact of healthcare. PED can be collected through different methodologies and these need to be robust and validated for its intended use. Medicine regulators are increasingly encouraging stakeholders to generate, collect and submit PED to support both scientific advice in development programs and regulatory decisions on the approval and use of these medicines. This article reviews the existing definitions and types of PED and demonstrate the potential for use in different settings of medicines' life cycle, focusing on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) and Patient Preferences (PP). Furthermore, it addresses some challenges and opportunities, alluding to important regulatory guidance that has been published, methodological aspects and digitalization, highlighting the lack of guidance as a key hurdle to achieve more systematic inclusion of PED in regulatory submissions. In addition, the article discusses opportunities at European and global level that could be implemented to leverage PED use. New digital tools that allow patients to collect PED in real time could also contribute to these advances, but it is equally important not to overlook the challenges they entail. The numerous and relevant initiatives being developed by various stakeholders in this field, including regulators, show their confidence in PED's value and create an ideal moment to address challenges and consolidate PED use across medicines' life cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Almeida
- Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Denise Umuhire
- Data Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rosa Gonzalez-Quevedo
- Public and Stakeholders Engagement Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ana António
- Referrals Office, Quality and Safety of Medicines Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Juan Garcia Burgos
- Public and Stakeholders Engagement Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patrice Verpillat
- Data Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nathalie Bere
- Regulatory Practice and Analysis, Medsafe—New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Bruno Sepodes
- Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carla Torre
- Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Westerink HJ, Garvelink MM, van Uden-Kraan CF, Zouitni O, Bart HAJ, van der Wees PJ, van der Nat PB. Evaluating patient participation in value-based healthcare: Current state and lessons learned. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13945. [PMID: 39102682 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Value-based healthcare (VBHC) focusses on increasing value for patients. Hospitals aim to implement VBHC via value improvement (VI) teams for medical conditions. To determine the patient's perspective on value, collective patient participation is important in these teams. We therefore evaluated the current state of patient participation in VI teams and share lessons learned. METHODS This mixed-methods study was conducted at seven collaborating hospitals in the Netherlands. A questionnaire (the public and patient engagement evaluation tool) was tailored to the study's context, completed by VI team members (n = 147 from 76 different VI teams) and analysed with descriptive statistics. In addition, 30 semistructured interviews were held with VI team members and analysed through thematic analysis. Data were collected between February 2022 and January 2023 and were triangulated by mapping the quantitative results to the interview themes. RESULTS Thirty-eight of the 76 included VI teams reported using a form of patient participation. Many respondents (71%) indicated a lack of a clear strategy and goal for patient participation. Multiple VI team members believed that specific knowledge and skills are required for patients to participate in a VI team, but this led to concerns regarding the representativeness of participating patients. Furthermore, while patients indicated that they experienced some level of hierarchy, they also stated that they did not feel restricted hereby. Lastly, patients were satisfied with their participation and felt like equal VI team members (100%), but they did mention a lack of feedback from the VI team on their input. CONCLUSION The results imply the lack of full implementation of patient participation within VI teams. Guidelines should be developed that provide information on how to include a representative group of patients, which methods to use, how to evaluate the impact of patient participation, and how to give feedback to participating patients. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Two patient advisors were part of the research team and attended the research team meetings. They were involved as research partners in all phases of the study, including drafting the protocol (e.g., drafting interview guides and selecting the measurement instrument), interpreting the results and writing this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrike J Westerink
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam M Garvelink
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ouisam Zouitni
- Client Council, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht/Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Philip J van der Wees
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul B van der Nat
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Woodward EN, Castillo AIM, True G, Willging C, Kirchner JE. Challenges and promising solutions to engaging patients in healthcare implementation in the United States: an environmental scan. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:29. [PMID: 38178131 PMCID: PMC10768202 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10315-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One practice in healthcare implementation is patient engagement in quality improvement and systems redesign. Implementers in healthcare systems include clinical leadership, middle managers, quality improvement personnel, and others facilitating changes or adoption of new interventions. Patients provide input into different aspects of health research. However, there is little attention to involve patients in implementing interventions, especially in the United States (U.S.), and this might be essential to reduce inequities. Implementers need clear strategies to overcome challenges, and might be able to learn from countries outside the U.S. METHODS We wanted to understand existing work about how patients are being included in implementation activities in real world U.S. healthcare settings. We conducted an environmental scan of three data sources: webinars, published articles, and interviews with implementers who engaged patients in implementation activities in U.S. healthcare settings. We extracted, categorized, and triangulated from data sources the key activities, recurring challenges, and promising solutions using a coding template. RESULTS We found 27 examples of patient engagement in U.S. healthcare implementation across four webinars, 11 published articles, and seven interviews, mostly arranging patient engagement through groups and arranging processes for patients that changed how engaged they were able to be. Participants rarely specified if they were engaging a population experiencing healthcare inequities. Participants described eight recurring challenges; the two most frequently identified were: (1) recruiting patients representative of those served in the healthcare system; and (2) ensuring processes for equitable communication among all. We matched recurring challenges to promising solutions, such as logistic solutions on how to arrange meetings to enhance engagement or training in inclusivity and power-sharing. CONCLUSION We clarified how some U.S. implementers are engaging patients in healthcare implementation activities using less and more intensive engagement. It was unclear whether reducing inequities was a goal. Patient engagement in redesigning U.S. healthcare service delivery appears similar to or less intense than in countries with more robust infrastructure for this, such as Canada and the United Kingdom. Challenges were common across jurisdictions, including retaining patients in the design/delivery of implementation activities. Implementers in any region can learn from those in other places.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva N Woodward
- VA Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, Building 11, North Little Rock, AR, 72114, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
| | - Andrea Isabel Melgar Castillo
- VA Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, Building 11, North Little Rock, AR, 72114, USA
- Graduate School, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Gala True
- South Central Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, 2400 Canal St, New Orleans, LA, 70119, USA
- Section on Community and Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University, 2400 Canal St (11F), New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Cathleen Willging
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 851 University Boulevard, Suite 101, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA
| | - JoAnn E Kirchner
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
- Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, Building 11, North Little Rock, AR, 72114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bertelsen N, Dewulf L, Ferrè S, Vermeulen R, Schroeder K, Gatellier L, Sargeant I, Luzuriaga D, Chapman H, Brooke N. Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: A Global Landscape Review. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2024; 58:63-78. [PMID: 37743397 PMCID: PMC10764510 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-023-00573-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Working with patients through meaningful patient engagement (PE) and incorporating patient experience data (PXD) is increasingly important in medicines and medical device development. However, PE in the planning, organization, generation, and interpretation of PXD within regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) decision-making processes remains challenging. We conducted a global review of the PE and PXD landscape to identify evolving resources by geography to support and highlight the potential of integration of PE and PXD in regulatory assessment and HTA. METHODS A review of literature/public information was conducted (August 2021-January 2023), led by a multistakeholder group comprising those with lived or professional experience of PE and PXD, to identify relevant regulatory and HTA initiatives and resources reviewed and categorized by geography and focus area. RESULTS Overall, 53 relevant initiatives/resources were identified (global, 14; North America, 11; Europe, 11; Asia, nine; UK, six; Latin America, one; Africa, one). Most focused either on PE (49%) or PXD (28%); few (11%) mentioned both PE and PXD (as largely separate activities) or demonstrated an integration of PE and PXD (11%). CONCLUSIONS Our analysis demonstrates increasing interest in PE, PXD, and guidance on their use individually in decision-making. However, more work is needed to offer guidance on maximizing the value of patient input into decisions by combining both PE and PXD into regulatory and HTA processes; the necessity of integrating PE in the design and interpretation of PXD programs should be highlighted. A co-created framework to achieve this integration is part of a future project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Bertelsen
- HTAi Patient & Citizen Involvement in HTA Interest Group, Neil Bertelsen Consulting, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lode Dewulf
- Independent Expert, Les Contamines-Montjoie, France
| | | | | | | | - Laureline Gatellier
- National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan
- NPO Japan Brain Tumor Alliance, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | | | - Hayley Chapman
- Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Nicholas Brooke
- Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Westerink HJ, Oirbans T, Garvelink MM, van Uden-Kraan CF, Zouitni O, Bart HAJ, van der Wees PJ, van der Nat PB. Barriers and facilitators of meaningful patient participation at the collective level in healthcare organizations: A systematic review. Health Policy 2023; 138:104946. [PMID: 38000333 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Collective patient participation, such as patient participation in policy making, has become increasingly important to achieve high-quality care. However, there is little knowledge on how to let patients participate in a meaningful manner at this level. The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide an overview of barriers, facilitators, and associated impact of collective patient participation. METHODS PubMed and EMBASE were searched until May 2023 for studies that evaluated collective patient participation. Study characteristics, methods for patient participation, barriers and facilitators, and impact (if measured) of patient participation were extracted from the articles. RESULTS We included 59 articles. Identified barriers and facilitators of collective patient participation were grouped into five categories: (1) preconditions for patient participation, (2) strategy for patient participation, (3) preparation of patients and staff for patient participation, (4) support for patients and staff during patient participation, and (5) evaluation of patient participation. Impact of patient participation was reported in 34 included studies at three levels: quality of care and research, the team and organization, and the participants themselves. Only three studies reported quantitative outcomes. CONCLUSION Interestingly, similar challenges were experienced during a period of twenty years, indicating that little progress has been made in structuring patient participation. Our overview of barriers and facilitators will therefore help to improve and structure collective patient participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrike J Westerink
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Tom Oirbans
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam M Garvelink
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ouisam Zouitni
- Client Council, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans A J Bart
- Independent patient advocate (former policymaker for the Netherlands Patients Federation, now retired)
| | - Philip J van der Wees
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul B van der Nat
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pateman KA, Christoffersen A, Hanly-Platz A, Williams C, Heffernan D, Alexander A, Ryan E, Petrie C, Banks M, Young A. Partnering with consumers to co-design a person-centred coding framework for qualitative patient experience data. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 116:107938. [PMID: 37598583 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) provide health organisations insight into how 'person-centric' care is. Qualitative data in PREMs surveys provide essential context about experience but are challenging to analyse at an organisational level. OBJECTIVE To co-design a person-centred coding framework to assist in the analysis of qualitative PREMs data. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT Consumer representatives were involved in problem identification, co-design, coding of raw data (testing), evaluation and manuscript authorship. METHODOLOGY Co-design principles guided production of a deductive coding framework with Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care as a conceptual framework. The framework was co-designed over 4 stages, with cross-professional stakeholders (including two consumer representatives): 1) assessment of current state and understanding priorities; 2) adapting Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care as a coding framework; 3) testing and evaluation of a coding template over two quality improvement (QI) cycles against measures of inter-coder reliability and perceived usefulness; 4) endorsement and planning for implementation. RESULTS The Picker Principles were a suitable coding framework for inpatient PREMs data, and a coding template in an electronic spreadsheet met end-user needs. Results of the first QI cycle indicated a need for 'less academic' domain names and definitions, which were reviewed and updated to a first-person perspective in partnership with a consumer representative. Inter-coder reliability measures and qualitative feedback improved after cycle two testing and evaluation. DISCUSSION This single site study produced a feasible solution to apply person-centred principles to analyse PREMs data and requires testing in different settings. Cross-disciplinary partnerships enabled the development of a reliable and acceptable deductive coding framework that was usable for people without prior experience in qualitative data analysis. PRACTICAL VALUE Our solution offers an example for health services to harness the value of qualitative PREMs data and partner with consumers to take person-centric action to improve the safety, equity, and experience of healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey Ann Pateman
- School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Allied Health Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia.
| | - Anja Christoffersen
- Safety and Implementation Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia; Champion Health Agency, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Aideen Hanly-Platz
- Safety and Implementation Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia
| | - Cory Williams
- Surgery and Perioperative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia
| | - Danielle Heffernan
- Internal Medicine Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia
| | - Alison Alexander
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Ryan
- Women's and Newborn Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia
| | - Christine Petrie
- Consumer and Community Engagement, Metro North Health, Herston, Australia
| | - Merrilyn Banks
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia
| | - Adrienne Young
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia; Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lang MJ, Dafny HA, Fergusson L, Brömdal AC. High-risk antenatal women's perceptions of dietitian appointments and information. Heliyon 2023; 9:e18106. [PMID: 37636384 PMCID: PMC10458281 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Problem The dietitian service at a metropolitan health service in Queensland, Australia has a non-engagement rate for high-risk antenatal women of 50%. Aim Determine which attributes are related to non-attendance at dietitian appointments, and women's perceptions and attitudes towards dietitian appointments during pregnancy. Methods An explanatory mixed-methods design was utilised, with first phase including 103 antenatal women referred to a dietitian in 2021 and compared the attributes of those who attended with those who did not engage. Queensland Health electronic databases were used to collect attribute data, which were then analysed with Jamovi (version 1.6) for descriptive, correlational, multivariate analyses of variance MANOVA. Second phase included seven semi-structured interviews with women attending a dietitian appointment, and subsequently analysed through thematic analysis. Results Distance from clinic was not related to clinic attendance, and women reported they would attend regardless of distance or work status. Non-attendance was related to higher gravidity, parity, and if referred for obesity, but not previous gastric sleeve or underweight referral. Six themes were identified from the interview data: "Women want to be treated like an individual," "It's all about expectations," "Midwives hold the key," "Preferences in receiving dietary information," "Weight has been a long-term problem and is a sensitive topic," and "Barriers to attendance." Conclusion Antenatal services can adjust service delivery to improve engagement in weight management services during pregnancy. Telehealth appointments may reduce non-engagement due to distance from clinic. Demystifying the dietitian appointment, ensuring non-judgemental referral processes and collaboration between midwives and dietitians will ensure that women value the service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle J. Lang
- Nutrition and Foodservices, West Moreton Health, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
- School of Education, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hila A. Dafny
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences and Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lee Fergusson
- School of Education, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Annette C.G. Brömdal
- School of Education, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts, Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Koo YR, Kim EJ, Nam IC. Effective Co-Creation Tool Development for Shared Understanding and Active Communication for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11081180. [PMID: 37108015 PMCID: PMC10138762 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11081180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
To improve the quality of life of cancer patients, patient experience (PE) must be improved along with the overall treatment process. This study aimed to develop an effective and practical co-design tool to improve the healthcare service experience of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in various factors. The research consisted of four phases: (1) HNC PE categories for healthcare improvement were identified through systematic review, user interviews, and observation; (2) a focus group meeting was held to materialize the card design; (3) a structured and visual card set was developed for stakeholders to share the content and discuss improvements in PE effectively; (4) to evaluate the feasibility of the developed cards, a co-creation workshop with HNC medical staffs was conducted. From the workshop using insight cards, we identified the differences in the medical staff's and patients' perspectives on the factors for improving HNC PE in each stage of the treatment journey. Pat Exp Insight Cards as experience-based co-design (EBCD) tools can be useful for stakeholders to empathize with the specific pain points and needs of patients with HNC and to discuss improvement plans efficiently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo-Ri Koo
- Department of Service Design, Graduate School of Industrial Arts, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Jeong Kim
- Department of Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Inn-Chul Nam
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon 21431, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Olmos-Ochoa TT, Luger TM, Oishi A, Dyer KE, Sumberg A, Canelo I, Gideonse TK, Cheney A, Yano EM, Hamilton AB. Challenges to Engaging Women Veterans in Quality Improvement From Patient Care to Policy: Women's Health Managers' Perspectives. Womens Health Issues 2023; 33:199-207. [PMID: 36153165 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients are uniquely positioned to identify issues and to provide innovative solutions to problems impacting their care. Yet, patient engagement in quality improvement (QI) and health care governance remains limited and underexplored. In the Veterans Health Administration, the work of women's health managers (WHMs) includes engaging women veterans, a numerical minority with unique health care needs, in QI. We aimed to understand the extent to which WHMs engage women veterans along a continuum, highlight challenges to engagement, and identify potential strategies to facilitate multilevel patient engagement. METHODS Data were generated from a multisite evaluation to improve delivery of comprehensive women's health care in Veterans Health Administration primary care sites. We conducted 39 semistructured interviews with WHMs across 21 sites. Guided by Carman et al.'s patient engagement framework, we analyzed the interviews using rapid-qualitative and content analysis methods. RESULTS When effectively engaged, women veterans were important champions and partners in QI activities to improve the structure and delivery of care. However, most WHMs engaged women veterans in mainly informal or passive ways-that is, solicited feedback through comment cards, surveys, focus groups, and townhall meetings-and did not report pursuing more in-depth or long-term forms of engagement. WHMs also identified a variety of facilitators and challenges to engaging women veterans in QI. CONCLUSIONS There may be unanticipated benefits to health care policy from engaging patients in QI, especially for patients with unique health care needs who represent a minority within the health care system. However, managers require training and workflow integration of patient engagement tasks to increase their efficiency and allow for meaningful patient engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya T Olmos-Ochoa
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California.
| | - Tana M Luger
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California; Covenant Health Network, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Anneka Oishi
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California
| | - Karen E Dyer
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California
| | - Annie Sumberg
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California
| | - Ismelda Canelo
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California
| | - Theodore K Gideonse
- Department of Health, Science, and Behavior, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Ann Cheney
- Department of Social Medicine, Population, and Public Health, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California; Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alison B Hamilton
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California; Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Olsson ABS, Haaland-Øverby M, Stenberg U, Slettebø T, Strøm A. Primary healthcare professionals' experience with patient participation in healthcare service development: A qualitative study. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:100068. [PMID: 37213719 PMCID: PMC10194342 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective How healthcare professionals experience patient participation in health service development impacts its use. This participatory study explores primary healthcare professionals' perceptions of developing health services with patient representatives. Methods Four focus group interviews with primary healthcare professionals (n = 26) were conducted. We analyzed data by applying Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Results The healthcare professionals perceived having a complementary interprofessional relationship with the patient representatives and regarded them as colleagues. However, the professionals navigated between a position of authority and collaboration, reconciling the need for participation with its challenges, e.g., to identify the representatives' collective representation among their personal experience, to ensure a more evidence-informed result that they and their colleagues would endorse. Conclusions Regarding patient representatives as colleagues can blur the line between professionals and representatives' positions and functions and further complicate health service development. Our results indicate a need for skilled facilitators to lead the process. Innovation This study identifies issues that professionals are uncertain about when collaborating with representatives to develop primary healthcare services; difficulties that professionals must overcome to collaborate constructively with representatives. Our findings can inform healthcare professionals' education about patient participation on all levels. We have suggested topics to address.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Britt Sandvin Olsson
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4959 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- VID Specialized University, Faculty of Diakonia, Values and Professional Practice, Postboks 184 Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway
- Corresponding author at: Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4959 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Mette Haaland-Øverby
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4959 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Una Stenberg
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4959 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Frambu Resource Center for Rare Disorders, Sandbakkveien 18, 1404 Siggerud, Norway
| | - Tor Slettebø
- VID Specialized University, Faculty of Social Studies, Postboks 184 Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Strøm
- VID Specialized University, Faculty of Health Studies, Postboks 184 Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Claessens F, Castro EM, Jans A, Jacobs L, Seys D, Van Wilder A, Brouwers J, Van der Auwera C, De Ridder D, Vanhaecht K. Patients' and kin's perspective on healthcare quality compared to Lachman's multidimensional quality model: Focus group interviews. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:3151-3159. [PMID: 35843847 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify key attributes of healthcare quality relevant to patients and kin and to compare them to Lachman's multidimensional quality model. METHODS Four focus groups with patients and kin were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and a purposive sampling method. Classical content analysis and constant comparison method were used to focus data analysis on individual and group level. RESULTS Communication with patients, kin and professionals emerged as a new dimension from interview transcripts. Other identified key attributes largely corresponded with Lachman's multidimensional quality model. They were mainly classified in dimensions: 'Partnership and Co-Production', 'Dignity and Respect' and 'Effectiveness'. Technical quality dimensions were linked to organisational aspects of care in terms of staffing levels and time. The dimension 'Eco-friendly' was not addressed by patients or kin. CONCLUSIONS The results enhance the comprehension of healthcare quality and contribute to its academic understanding by validating Lachman's multidimensional quality model from patients' and kin's perspective. The model robustness is increased by including communication as a quality dimension surrounding technical domains and core values. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The key attributes can serve as a holistic framework for healthcare organisations to design their quality management system. An instrument can be developed to measure key attributes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fien Claessens
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy - Department of Public Health, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Eva Marie Castro
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy - Department of Public Health, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Tienen, Tienen, Belgium
| | - Anneke Jans
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy - Department of Public Health, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, Sint-Trudo Ziekenhuis, Sint-Truiden, Belgium
| | - Laura Jacobs
- Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Deborah Seys
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy - Department of Public Health, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Astrid Van Wilder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy - Department of Public Health, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Brouwers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy - Department of Public Health, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Van der Auwera
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy - Department of Public Health, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy - Department of Public Health, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kris Vanhaecht
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy - Department of Public Health, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jesus TS, Stern BZ, Struhar J, Deutsch A, Heinemann AW. The use of patient experience feedback in rehabilitation quality improvement and codesign activities: Scoping review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2022; 37:261-276. [DOI: 10.1177/02692155221126690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective To characterize the literature, reported enablers, and gaps on the use of patient experience feedback for person-centered rehabilitation quality improvement and codesign activities. Design Scoping Review. Data sources Scientific databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Rehabdata, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest), website searches (e.g. Beryl Institute), snowballing, and key-informant recommendations. Methods Two independent reviewers performed title and abstract screenings and full-text reviews. Eligibility focused on English-language, peer-reviewed (all time) and gray literature (last five years) that used patient experience feedback in rehabilitation improvement activities. The aims, settings, methods, findings, implications, and reported limitations were extracted, followed by content analyses identifying reported enablers and gaps. Results Among the 901 unique references and 52 full texts reviewed, ten were included: four used patient experience surveys for improving patient experiences; six used codesign methodologies to engage patient feedback in service improvement activities. Implementation enablers included securing managerial support, having a structured methodology and facilitator, using efficient processes, engaging staff experiences, and using appreciative inquiry. Reported study gaps included limited follow-up, low sample sizes, analytical limitations, lack of reported limitations, or narrow range of perspectives (e.g. not from people with severe impairments). Conclusion Few examples of the use of patient experience feedback in quality improvement or codesign activities were found in the rehabilitation literature. Patient experience improvement activities relied exclusively on retrospective survey data, which were not combined with often more actionable forms (e.g. qualitative, real time) of patient experience feedback. Further research might consider design of activities that collect and use patient experience feedback for rehabilitation service improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- TS Jesus
- Center for Education in Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - BZ Stern
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Struhar
- Nerve, Muscle + Bone Innovation Center & Oncology Innovation Center, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - A Deutsch
- Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- RTI International, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - AW Heinemann
- Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim EJ, Nam IC, Koo YR. Reframing Patient Experience Approaches and Methods to Achieve Patient-Centeredness in Healthcare: Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19159163. [PMID: 35954517 PMCID: PMC9367952 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
(1) There has been growing attention among healthcare researchers on new and innovative methodologies for improving patient experience. This study reviewed the approaches and methods used in current patient experience research by applying the perspective of design thinking to discuss practical methodologies for a patient-centered approach and creative problem-solving. (2) A scoping review was performed to identify research trends in healthcare. A four-stage design thinking process (“Discover”, “Define”, “Develop”, and “Deliver”) and five themes (“User focus”, “Problem-framing”, “Visualization”, “Experimentation”, and “Diversity”), characterizing the concept, were used for the analysis framework. (3) After reviewing 67 studies, the current studies show that the iterative process of divergent and convergent thinking is lacking, which is a core concept of design thinking, and it is necessary to employ an integrative methodology to actively apply collaborative, multidisciplinary, and creative attributes for a specific and tangible solution. (4) For creative problem-solving to improve patient experience, we should explore the possibilities of various solutions by an iterative process of divergent and convergent thinking. A concrete and visualized solution should be sought through active user interactions from various fields. For this, a specific methodology that allows users to collaborate by applying the integrative viewpoint of design thinking should be introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun-Jeong Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Catholic Medical Center, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea;
| | - Inn-Chul Nam
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 21431, Korea
- Correspondence: (I.-C.N.); (Y.-R.K.)
| | - Yoo-Ri Koo
- Department of Service Design, Graduate School of Industrial Arts, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea
- Correspondence: (I.-C.N.); (Y.-R.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Claessens F, Seys D, Brouwers J, Van Wilder A, Jans A, Castro EM, Bruyneel L, De Ridder D, Vanhaecht K. A co-creation roadmap towards sustainable quality of care: A multi-method study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269364. [PMID: 35771777 PMCID: PMC9246114 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Hospitals demonstrated increased efforts into quality improvement over the past years. Their growing commitment to quality combined with a heterogeneity in perceptions among healthcare stakeholders cause concerns on the sustainable incorporation of quality into the daily workflow. Questions are raised on the drivers for a sustainable hospital quality policy. We aimed to identify drivers and incorporate them into a new, unique roadmap towards sustainable quality of care in hospitals. Design A multi-method design guided by an eight-phase approach to develop a conceptual framework consists of multiple, iterative phases of data collection, synthesis and validation. Starting with a narrative review followed by a qualitative in-depth analysis and including feedback of national and international healthcare stakeholders. Setting Hospitals. Results The narrative review included 59 relevant papers focusing on quality improvement and the sustainability of these improved quality results. By integrating, synthesising and resynthesizing concepts during thematic and content analysis, the narrative review evolved to an integrated, co-creation roadmap. The Flanders Quality Model (FlaQuM) is presented as a driver diagram that features six primary drivers for a sustainable quality policy: (1) Quality Design and Planning, (2) Quality Control, (3) Quality Improvement, (4) Quality Leadership, (5) Quality Culture and (6) Quality Context. Six primary drivers are described in 19 building blocks (secondary drivers) and 104 evidence-based action fields. Conclusions The framework suggests that a manageable number of drivers, building blocks and action fields may support the sustainable incorporation of quality into the daily workflow. Therefore, FlaQuM can serve as a useful roadmap for future sustainable quality policies in hospitals and for future empirical and theoretical work in sustainable quality management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fien Claessens
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy–Department of Public Health, KU Leuven–University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- * E-mail:
| | - Deborah Seys
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy–Department of Public Health, KU Leuven–University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Jonas Brouwers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy–Department of Public Health, KU Leuven–University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Astrid Van Wilder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy–Department of Public Health, KU Leuven–University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Anneke Jans
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy–Department of Public Health, KU Leuven–University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Quality Management, Sint-Trudo Ziekenhuis, Sint-Truiden, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Eva Marie Castro
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy–Department of Public Health, KU Leuven–University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Quality Management, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Tienen, Tienen, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Luk Bruyneel
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy–Department of Public Health, KU Leuven–University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy–Department of Public Health, KU Leuven–University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Kris Vanhaecht
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy–Department of Public Health, KU Leuven–University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bergerum C, Wolmesjö M, Thor J. Organising and managing patient and public involvement to enhance quality improvement – comparing a Swedish and a Dutch hospital. Health Policy 2022; 126:603-612. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Creese J, Byrne JP, Olson R, Humphries N. A catalyst for change: Developing a collaborative reflexive ethnographic approach to research with hospital doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS 2022; 16:3-14. [PMID: 38603431 PMCID: PMC9713536 DOI: 10.1177/20597991221137813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
The understanding of what ethnography looks like, and its purpose, is continuously evolving. COVID-19 posed a significant challenge to ethnographers, particularly those working in health-related research. Researchers have developed alternative forms of ethnography to overcome some of these challenges; we developed the Mobile Instant Messaging Ethnography (MIME) adaptation to ethnography in 2021 to overcome restrictions to our own research with hospital doctors. However, for ethnographic innovations to make a substantial contribution to methodology, they should not simply be borne of necessity, but of a dedicated drive to expand paradigms of research, to empower participant groups and to produce change - in local systems, in participant-collaborators and in researchers and the research process itself. In this paper, we reflect on our experiences using MIME, involving collaborative remote observation and reflection with 28 hospital doctors in Ireland from June to December 2021. After reviewing literature on ethnography in COVID-19 and general epistemological developments in ethnography, we detail the MIME approach and illustrate how MIME presents an evolution of the ethnographic approach, not only practically but in terms of its reflexive shift, its connected and co-creative foundations, and its ability to drive change in research approaches, participant life-worlds and real-world improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Creese
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - John-Paul Byrne
- Graduate School of Population Healthcare Management, Royal College of Surgeons University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rebecca Olson
- School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Niamh Humphries
- Graduate School of Population Healthcare Management, Royal College of Surgeons University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Palozzi G, Antonucci G. Mobile-Health based physical activities co-production policies towards cardiovascular diseases prevention: findings from a mixed-method systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:277. [PMID: 35232456 PMCID: PMC8886562 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07637-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the first cause of death globally, with huge costs worldwide. Most cases of CVD could be prevented by addressing behavioural risk factors. Among these factors, there is physical and amateur sports activity (PASA), which has a linear negative correlation with the risk of CVD. Nevertheless, attempts to encourage PASA, as exercise prescription programmes, achieved little impact at the community-wide level. A new frontier to promote PASA is represented by mobile health tools, such as exergaming, mobile device apps, health wearables, GPS/GIS and virtual reality. Nevertheless, there has not yet been any evident turnabout in patient active involvement towards CVD prevention, and inactivity rates are even increasing. This study aims at framing the state of the art of the literature about the use of m-health in supporting PASA, as a user-centric innovation strategy, to promote co-production health policies aiming at CVD prevention. METHODS A mixed-method systematic literature review was conducted in the fields of health and healthcare management to highlight the intersections between PASA promotion and m-health tools in fostering co-produced services focused on CVD prevention. The literature has been extracted by the PRISMA logic application. The resulting sample has been first statistically described by a bibliometric approach and then further investigated with a conceptual analysis of the most relevant contributions, which have been qualitatively analysed. RESULTS We identified 2,295 studies, on which we ran the bibliometric analysis. After narrowing the research around the co-production field, we found 10 papers relevant for the concept analysis of contents. The interest about the theme has increased in the last two decades, with a high prevalence of contributions from higher income countries and those with higher CVD incidence. The field of research is highly multi-disciplinary; most of documents belong to the medical field, with only a few interconnections with the technology and health policy spheres. Although the involvement of patients is recognized as fundamental for CVD prevention through PASA, co-design schemes are still lacking at the public management level. CONCLUSIONS While the link between the subjects of motor activity, medicine and technology is clear, the involvement of citizens in the service delivery process is still underinvestigated, especially the issue concerning how "value co-creation" could effectively be applied by public agencies. In synthesis, the analysis of the role of co-production as a system coordination method, which is so important in designing and implementing preventive care, is still lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Palozzi
- Department Management & Law, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Antonucci
- DEA Department, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Viale Pindaro, 42, Pescara, 65127, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Souza ADZD, Hoffmeister LV, Moura GMSSD. FACILITATORS AND BARRIERS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HOSPITAL SERVICES: INTEGRATIVE REVIEW. TEXTO & CONTEXTO ENFERMAGEM 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2020-0395en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective to identify the facilitating factors and barriers that influence patient involvement in hospital services. Method integrative review; search of articles published between January 2011 and December 2020, in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cinahl, Lilacs and Scopus, using descriptors related to "patient involvement", Barriers, Facilitators, in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Data collection was performed from May to June 2021, identifying 32 publications that met the inclusion criteria. Results the analysis resulted in three categories of facilitating factors and barriers: communication, actors of involvement and organizational culture, allowing the elaboration of a theoretical model of patient involvement. This model shows that in the centrality of the process are the actors involved, that is, patients and professionals, inserted in an organizational context, being influenced by leadership, culture, environment, available resources and processes, where communication permeates as a basis for involvement. Conclusion the facilitating factors and barriers identified in this review, synthesized in a theoretical model, allow transcending theoretical knowledge for practice. The complexity to operationalize this model requires patients, professionals, health services and society join forces to make this theoretical proposition a practice incorporated by the services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Louíse Viecili Hoffmeister
- Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal; Comprehensive Health Research Center, Portugal; Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Souza ADZD, Hoffmeister LV, Moura GMSSD. FACILITADORES E BARREIRAS DO ENVOLVIMENTO DO PACIENTE NOS SERVIÇOS HOSPITALARES: REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA. TEXTO & CONTEXTO ENFERMAGEM 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2020-0395pt] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
RESUMO Objetivo identificar os fatores facilitadores e as barreiras que influenciam no envolvimento do paciente nos serviços hospitalares. Método revisão integrativa; realizada busca de artigos publicados entre janeiro de 2011 e dezembro de 2020, nas bases eletrônicas PubMed, Web of Science, Cinahl, Lilacs e Scopus, utilizando descritores relacionados a “patient involvement”, Barriers, Facilitators, nos idiomas inglês, espanhol e português. Coleta de dados realizada de maio a junho de 2021, identificando-se 32 publicações que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Resultados a análise resultou em três categorias de fatores facilitadores e barreiras: comunicação, atores do envolvimento e cultura organizacional, permitindo a elaboração de um modelo teórico de envolvimento do paciente. Esse modelo mostra que na centralidade do processo estão os atores envolvidos, ou seja, pacientes e profissionais, inseridos em um contexto organizacional, sendo influenciados pela liderança, cultura, ambiente, recursos disponíveis e processos, onde a comunicação perpassa como base para o envolvimento. Conclusão os fatores facilitadores e as barreiras identificadas nesta revisão, sintetizados num modelo teórico, permitem transcender o conhecimento teórico para a prática. A complexidade para operacionalizar esse modelo requer que pacientes, profissionais, serviços de saúde e sociedade unam os esforços para tornar esta proposição teórica em uma prática incorporada pelos serviços.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Louíse Viecili Hoffmeister
- Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal; Comprehensive Health Research Center, Portugal; Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Strategies and lessons learnt from user involvement in researching quality and safety in nursing homes and homecare. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GOVERNANCE 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/ijhg-05-2021-0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose is to share strategies, rationales and lessons learnt from user involvement in a quality and safety improvement research project from the practice field in nursing homes and homecare services.Design/methodology/approachThis is a viewpoint paper summarizing how researchers and co-researchers from the practice field of nursing homes and homecare services (nurse counsellors from different municipalities, patient ombudsman and next-of-kin representatives/and elderly care organization representant) experienced user involvement through all phases of the research project. The project included implementation of a leadership intervention.FindingsMultiple strategies of user involvement were applied during the project including partnership in the consortium, employment of user representatives (co-researchers) and user-led research activities. The rationale was to ensure sound context adaptation of the intervention and development of tailor-made activities and tools based on equality and mutual trust in the collaboration. Both university-based researchers and Co-researchers experienced it as useful and necessary to involve or being involved in all phases of the research project, including the designing, planning, intervention implementation, evaluation and dissemination of results.Originality/valueUser involvement in research is a growing field. There is limited focus on this aspect in quality and safety interventions in nursing homes and homecare settings and in projects focussing on the leadership' role in improving quality and safety.
Collapse
|