1
|
Upfold C, Jentz C, Heilmann P, Nathanielsen N, Chaimowitz G, Sørensen LU. Forensic psychiatry patients, services, and legislation in Nunavut and Greenland. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2023; 91:101921. [PMID: 37690360 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Circumpolar regions face unique challenges in establishing and maintaining mental health care systems, including forensic psychiatry services. The scarcity of data and lack of evidence concerning the forensic psychiatry patient (FPP) populations of Nunavut and Greenland exacerbates the challenges of informing best practices and healthcare planning. By comparing the prevalence of forensic psychiatry patients, the mental health care services, and the legislation in these two relatively similar but unique regions, insight may be gained that can help inform healthcare planning. This cross-sectional study includes all forensic psychiatry in- and outpatients in one year from Nunavut (2018) and on February 29, 2020, in Greenland. The Greenland sample (n = 93) was nearly four times larger than the Nunavut sample (n = 15) at the population level. Despite considerable differences in forensic legislation and service supply, the forensic psychiatry patients in the two areas share several similarities. A total of 87% (n = 13) in the Nunavut sample were diagnosed with a DSM-5 schizophrenia spectrum disorder or other psychotic disorder. In Greenland, 82% (n = 76) were diagnosed with an ICD-10 F2 diagnosis (schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders). Approximately 2/3 of the patients in both populations were diagnosed with substance use disorder, and 60% of the Nunavut FPP received long-acting antipsychotic injections versus 62% in Greenland. Nearly half of the FPPs in both populations had never been convicted prior to entering the forensic psychiatry system; Nunavut 45% versus Greenland 47%. A substantial proportion of Greenlandic FPPs were outpatients compared to Nunavut (83% versus 47%). This study is an essential first step toward describing a Model of Care for forensic psychiatry patients in circumpolar regions; furthermore, the clinical similarities between the two populations provide support for future joint Arctic research and the inclusion of artic forensic patients in international studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey Upfold
- Forensic Psychiatry Program, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Canada
| | - Christian Jentz
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | | | | | - Gary Chaimowitz
- Forensic Psychiatry Program, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Canada; McMaster University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Canada.
| | - Lisbeth Uhrskov Sørensen
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Terrill K, Woodall H, Evans R, Sen Gupta T, Ward R, Brumpton K. Cultural safety in telehealth consultations with Indigenous people: A scoping review of global literature. J Telemed Telecare 2023:1357633X231203874. [PMID: 37849289 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x231203874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Telehealth has become increasingly routine within healthcare and has potential to reduce barriers to care, including for Indigenous populations. However, it is crucial for practitioners to first ensure that their telehealth practice is culturally safe. This review aims to describe the attributes of culturally safe telehealth consultations for Indigenous people as well as strategies that could promote cultural safety. METHODS A scoping review was conducted on key features of cultural safety in telehealth for Indigenous people using the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and PRISMA-ScR checklist. Five electronic databases were searched, and additional literature was identified through handsearching. RESULTS A total of 649 articles were screened resulting in 17 articles included in the review. The central themes related to the provision of culturally safe telehealth refer to attributes of the practitioner: cultural and community knowledge, communication skills and the building and maintenance of patient-provider relationships. These practitioner attributes are modified and shaped by external environmental factors: technology, the availability of support staff and the telehealth setting. DISCUSSION This review identified practitioner-led features which enhance cultural safety but also recognised the structural factors that can contribute, both positively and negatively, to the cultural safety of a telehealth interaction. For some individuals, telehealth is not a comfortable or acceptable form of care. However, if strategies are undertaken to make telehealth more culturally safe, it has the potential to increase opportunities for access to care and thus contribute towards reducing health inequalities faced by Indigenous peoples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty Terrill
- Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - Hannah Woodall
- Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD, Australia
- Rural Medical Education Australia, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | - Raelene Ward
- University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| | - Kay Brumpton
- Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD, Australia
- Rural Medical Education Australia, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moecke DP, Holyk T, Beckett M, Chopra S, Petlitsyna P, Girt M, Kirkham A, Kamurasi I, Turner J, Sneddon D, Friesen M, McDonald I, Denson-Camp N, Crosbie S, Camp PG. Scoping review of telehealth use by Indigenous populations from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. J Telemed Telecare 2023:1357633X231158835. [PMID: 36911983 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x231158835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Telehealth has the potential to address health disparities experienced by Indigenous people, especially in remote areas. This scoping review aims to map and characterize the existing evidence on telehealth use by Indigenous people and explore the key concepts for effective use, cultural safety, and building therapeutic relationships. METHODS A search for published and gray literature, written in English, and published between 2000 and 2022 was completed in 17 electronic databases. Two reviewers independently screened retrieved records for eligibility. For included articles, data were extracted, categorized, and analyzed. Synthesis of findings was performed narratively. RESULTS A total of 321 studies were included. The most popular type of telehealth used was mHealth (44%), and the most common health focuses of the telehealth interventions were mental health (26%) and diabetes/diabetic retinopathy (13%). Frequently described barriers to effective telehealth use included concerns about privacy/confidentiality and limited internet availability; meanwhile, telehealth-usage facilitators included cultural relevance and community engagement. Although working in collaboration with Indigenous communities was the most frequently reported way to achieve cultural safety, 40% of the studies did not report Indigenous involvement. Finally, difficulty to establish trusting therapeutic relationships was a major concern raised about telehealth, and evidence suggests that having the first visit-in-person is a potential way to address this issue. CONCLUSION This comprehensive review identified critical factors to guide the development of culturally-informed telehealth services to meet the needs of Indigenous people and to achieve equitable access and positive health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Débora Petry Moecke
- University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Travis Holyk
- Carrier Sekani Family Services, Prince George, Canada
| | - Madelaine Beckett
- University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sunaina Chopra
- University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Mirha Girt
- 1974Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Ivan Kamurasi
- University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Justin Turner
- University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Donovan Sneddon
- University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Ian McDonald
- University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | - Pat G Camp
- University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Appleton R, Barnett P, Vera San Juan N, Tuudah E, Lyons N, Parker J, Roxburgh E, Spyridonidis S, Tamworth M, Worden M, Yilmaz M, Sevdalis N, Lloyd-Evans B, Needle JJ, Johnson S. Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:78. [PMID: 36694164 PMCID: PMC9873395 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08993-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid shift from traditional face-to-face care provision towards delivering mental health care remotely through telecommunications, often referred to as telemental health care. However, the manner and extent of telemental health implementation have varied considerably across settings and areas, and substantial barriers are encountered. There is, therefore, a need to identify what works best for service users and staff and establish the key mechanisms for efficient integration into routine care. OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify investigations of pre-planned strategies reported in the literature intended to achieve or improve effective and sustained implementation of telemental health approaches (including video calls, telephone calls, text messaging platforms or a combination of any of these approaches with face-to-face care), and to evaluate how different strategies influence implementation outcomes. METHODS A systematic review was conducted, with five databases searched for any relevant literature published between January 2010 and July 2021. Studies were eligible if they took place in specialist mental health services and focused on pre-planned strategies to achieve or improve the delivery of mental health care through remote communication between mental health professionals or between mental health professionals and service users, family members, unpaid carers, or peer supporters. All included studies were quality-assessed. Data were synthesised using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of implementation strategies and the taxonomy of implementation outcomes. RESULTS A total of 14 studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria from a total of 14,294 records of which 338 were assessed at full text. All ERIC implementation strategies were used by at least one study, the most commonly reported being 'Train and educate stakeholders'. All studies reported using a combination of several implementation strategies, with the mean number of strategies used per study of 3.5 (range 2-6), many of which were reported to result in an improvement in implementation over time. Few studies specifically investigated a single implementation strategy and its associated outcomes, making conclusions regarding the most beneficial strategy difficult to draw. CONCLUSIONS Using a combination of implementation strategies appears to be a helpful method of supporting the implementation of telemental health. Further research is needed to test the impact of specific implementation strategies on implementation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Appleton
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.,Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth Tuudah
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Natasha Lyons
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK
| | - Jennie Parker
- Lived Experience Researcher, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK
| | - Emily Roxburgh
- Kingston iCope, Camden & Islington NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Nick Sevdalis
- Centre for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK
| | - Justin J Needle
- Centre for Health Services Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Galvin E, Desselle S, Gavin B, Quigley E, Flear M, Kilbride K, McNicholas F, Cullinan S, Hayden J. Patient and provider perspectives of the implementation of remote consultations for community-dwelling people with mental health conditions: A systematic mixed studies review. J Psychiatr Res 2022; 156:668-678. [PMID: 36399859 PMCID: PMC9637462 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.10.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Remote, or tele-, consultations became a necessary form of mental healthcare provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. As the prevalence of mental health problems rises, they may have a role in future mental health services. We aimed to review the literature on patient and provider perspectives on factors influencing the implementation of remote consultations for community-dwelling people with mental health conditions. We searched five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) for empirical research up to July 13th, 2022. Only studies of synchronous, interactive remote consultations conducted via video, phone, or live-messaging between patients and providers were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We integrated qualitative and quantitative data from 39 studies into a single mixed-methods synthesis. We mapped reported factors to the domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Acceptability was generally high among participants, despite concerns about the quality of care and the perceived impeded therapeutic relationship. A prominent facilitator was the increased accessibility and convenience of remote consultations, while lack of appropriate infrastructure and low patient comfort and competence were among the most prevalent barriers. This review highlights the importance of patient preferences and provider buy-in to the future of remote consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emer Galvin
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | | | - Blánaid Gavin
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Etain Quigley
- National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Maynooth, Ireland.
| | - Mark Flear
- Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | - Shane Cullinan
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - John Hayden
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roberts C, Darroch F, Giles A, van Bruggen R. Plan A, Plan B, and Plan C-OVID-19: adaptations for fly-in and fly-out mental health providers during COVID-19. Int J Circumpolar Health 2021; 80:1935133. [PMID: 34210240 PMCID: PMC8259817 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2021.1935133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Mental health providers have rapidly pivoted their in-person practices to teletherapy and telehealth interventions to address the increased demand for mental health services during the COVID-19 crisis. The change to service delivery has emphasised challenges for mental health service providers, particularly in regions that rely on fly-in and fly-out (FIFO) mental health service providers who are no longer able to travel to their places of work. In this qualitative study, we examined the impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of mental health services in Inuit Nunangat. Using a participatory action research methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with eight FIFO mental health service providers to understand their experiences and implement strategies to effectively deliver mental health services in a pandemic. We identified three themes through thematic analysis: 1) Service providers identify the challenges in adapting their practices to meet individual and community needs; 2) Service providers recognise the opportunities for enhancements to service delivery; 3) Service providers identify telemental health services as a potentially effective adjunct to in-person sessions. The findings support reconceptualising post-pandemic mental health service delivery to include both face-to-face and telemental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candace Roberts
- Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Francine Darroch
- Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Audrey Giles
- School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Upfold C, Chaimowitz G. Forensic psychiatry services in Nunavut. Int J Circumpolar Health 2021; 80:1954362. [PMID: 34278974 PMCID: PMC8291065 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2021.1954362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a paucity of research on forensic psychiatry patients from Nunavut, including no published data concerning the prevalence and characterisation of patients in this territory. The lack of basic information hinders the evaluation of services and establishing best practices. The current paper aims to characterise forensic psychiatry patients from Nunavut and further the understanding of the challenges in organising forensic psychiatry healthcare in Nunavut. A retrospective chart review design was used to examine individuals from Nunavut who are engaged with the Ontario forensic psychiatry system. The sample included all Unfit to Stand Trial (26.7%) and Not Criminally Responsible (73.3%) patients (N = 15) under the jurisdiction of the Nunavut Review Board in a one-year period. The average distance between the patient’s place of residence in Nunavut and the Ontario facilities was 2,517 km. Overall, 26.7% were living in Nunavut, 60.0% remained in Ontario, and 13.3% resided in Alberta. Results are presented for sociodemographics, forensic status, personal and familial history, psychiatric and criminal history, diagnoses, index offence characteristics, treatment, assessment tools, and aggression. The prevalence and many characteristics of forensic psychiatry patients from Nunavut differ from the rest of Canada and have important implications for the delivery of services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey Upfold
- Forensic Psychiatry Program, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton - West 5th Campus, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gary Chaimowitz
- Forensic Psychiatry Program, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton - West 5th Campus, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|