1
|
Emmert M, Rohrbacher S, Meier F, Heppe L, Drach C, Schindler A, Sander U, Patzelt C, Frömke C, Schöffski O, Lauerer M. The elicitation of patient and physician preferences for calculating consumer-based composite measures on hospital report cards: results of two discrete choice experiments. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1071-1085. [PMID: 38102524 PMCID: PMC11283427 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01650-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The calculation of aggregated composite measures is a widely used strategy to reduce the amount of data on hospital report cards. Therefore, this study aims to elicit and compare preferences of both patients as well as referring physicians regarding publicly available hospital quality information METHODS: Based on systematic literature reviews as well as qualitative analysis, two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were applied to elicit patients' and referring physicians' preferences. The DCEs were conducted using a fractional factorial design. Statistical data analysis was performed using multinomial logit models RESULTS: Apart from five identical attributes, one specific attribute was identified for each study group, respectively. Overall, 322 patients (mean age 68.99) and 187 referring physicians (mean age 53.60) were included. Our models displayed significant coefficients for all attributes (p < 0.001 each). Among patients, "Postoperative complication rate" (20.6%; level range of 1.164) was rated highest, followed by "Mobility at hospital discharge" (19.9%; level range of 1.127), and ''The number of cases treated" (18.5%; level range of 1.045). In contrast, referring physicians valued most the ''One-year revision surgery rate'' (30.4%; level range of 1.989), followed by "The number of cases treated" (21.0%; level range of 1.372), and "Postoperative complication rate" (17.2%; level range of 1.123) CONCLUSION: We determined considerable differences between both study groups when calculating the relative value of publicly available hospital quality information. This may have an impact when calculating aggregated composite measures based on consumer-based weighting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Emmert
- Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany.
| | - Stefan Rohrbacher
- Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Florian Meier
- Department of Management and Economics, SRH Wilhelm Löhe University of Applied Sciences, 90763, Fürth, Germany
| | - Laura Heppe
- School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Cordula Drach
- School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Anja Schindler
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Uwe Sander
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christiane Patzelt
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Cornelia Frömke
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oliver Schöffski
- School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Michael Lauerer
- Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Teymourifar A, Trindade MAM. Dynamic resectorization to improve utility of healthcare systems. JOURNAL OF HEALTH, POPULATION, AND NUTRITION 2024; 43:102. [PMID: 38970138 PMCID: PMC11229025 DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00594-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
Balancing is an essential challenge in healthcare systems that requires effective strategies. This study aims to address this crucial issue by suggesting a practical approach. We show the potential of balancing a regional healthcare system to improve its utility. We consider a regional healthcare system comprising multiple hospitals with different sizes, capacities, quality of service, and accessibility. We define a utility function for the system based on the sectorization concept, which endeavors to form a balance between hospitals in terms of essential outputs such as waiting times and demands. The dynamic nature of the system means that this balance degrades over time, necessitating periodic sectorization, which is called resectorization. Our methodology stands out for incorporating resectorization as a dynamic strategy, enabling more flexible and responsive adaptations to continuously changing healthcare needs. Unlike previous studies, based on a system-oriented approach, our resectorization scenarios include the periodic closure of some hospitals. This enables us to enhance both the capacity and quality of healthcare facilities. Furthermore, in contrast to other studies, we investigate the states of diminishing demand throughout the resectorization process. To provide empirical insights, we conduct a simulation using data from a real-world case study. Our analysis spans multiple time periods, enabling us to dynamically quantify the utility of the healthcare system. The numerical findings demonstrate that substantial utility improvements are attainable through the defined scenarios. The study suggests a practical solution to the critical challenge of balancing issues in regional healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aydin Teymourifar
- Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Católica Porto Business School, Centro de Estudos em Gestão e Economia, Porto, Portugal.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koller D, Maier W, Lack N, Grill E, Strobl R. Choosing a maternity hospital: a matter of travel distance or quality of care? RESEARCH IN HEALTH SERVICES & REGIONS 2024; 3:7. [PMID: 39177927 PMCID: PMC11281767 DOI: 10.1007/s43999-024-00041-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The choice of a hospital should be based on individual need and accessibility. For maternity hospitals, this includes known or expected risk factors, the geographic accessibility and level of care provided by the hospital. This study aims to identify factors influencing hospital choice with the aim to analyze if and how many deliveries are conducted in a risk-appropriate and accessible setting in Bavaria, Germany. METHODS This is a cross-sectional secondary data analysis based on all first births in Bavaria (2015-18) provided by the Bavarian Quality Assurance Institute for Medical Care. Information on the mother and on the hospital were included. The Bavarian Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010 was used to account for area-level socioeconomic differences. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate the strength of association of the predicting factors and to adjust for confounding. RESULTS We included 195,087 births. Distances to perinatal centers were longer than to other hospitals (16 km vs. 12 km). 10% of women with documented risk pregnancies did not deliver in a perinatal center. Regressions showed that higher age (OR 1.03; 1.02-1.03 95%-CI) and risk pregnancy (OR 1.44; 1.41-1.47 95%-CI) were associated with choosing a perinatal center. The distances travelled show high regional variation with a strong urban-rural divide. CONCLUSION In a health system with free choice of hospitals, many women chose a hospital close to home and/or according to their risks. However, this is not the case for 10% of mothers, a group that would benefit from more coordinated care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Koller
- Institute of Medical Data Processing, Biometrics and Epidemiology (IBE), Faculty of Medicine, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Werner Maier
- Institute of Medical Data Processing, Biometrics and Epidemiology (IBE), Faculty of Medicine, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicholas Lack
- Bavarian Institute for Quality Assurance, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva Grill
- Institute of Medical Data Processing, Biometrics and Epidemiology (IBE), Faculty of Medicine, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Ralf Strobl
- Institute of Medical Data Processing, Biometrics and Epidemiology (IBE), Faculty of Medicine, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alterio MM, Tobias M, Koehl A, Woods AL, Sun K, Campbell MJ, Graves CE. Who Serves Where: A Geospatial Analysis of Access to Endocrine Surgeons in the United States and Puerto Rico. Surgery 2024; 175:32-40. [PMID: 37935597 PMCID: PMC10841514 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between surgical volume and patient outcome is well established, with higher case volume associated with a lower risk of complications. We hypothesized that the geographic distribution of endocrine/head and neck surgeons with an endocrine focus in the United States and Puerto Rico may limit access to many potential patients, particularly in rural areas. METHODS We used web-based directories from the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons, American Head and Neck Society, and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery to identify endocrine surgery specialists in the United States and Puerto Rico. Using geographic coordinates and OpenStreetMap and Valhalla software, we calculated the areas within a 60-, 90-, or 120-minute driving distance from specialist offices. We used 2020 U.S. Census Data to calculate census tract populations inside or outside the accessible areas. RESULTS Excluding duplicate providers across organizations, we geocoded 603 specialist addresses in the United States and Puerto. We found that 23.76% (78.3 million) of Americans do not have access to a society-affiliated endocrine/head and neck surgeon with an endocrine focus within a 60-minute drive, 14.37% (47.4 million) within a 90-minute drive, and 8.38% (27.6 million) within a 120-minute drive. We observed that the areas of coverage are primarily focused on metropolitan areas. CONCLUSION Nearly one-third of Americans do not have access to a society-affiliated endocrine/head and neck surgeon with an endocrine focus within a 1-hour drive, highlighting a concerning geographic barrier to care. Further work is needed to facilitate patient access and mitigate disparities in quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeve M Alterio
- Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, WA
| | - Michele Tobias
- UCDavis DataLab, Data Science and Informatics, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Arthur Koehl
- UCDavis DataLab, Data Science and Informatics, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Alexis L Woods
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Kiyomi Sun
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Michael J Campbell
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Claire E Graves
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lv Y, Qin J, Feng X, Li S, Tang C, Wang H. Preferences of patients with diabetes mellitus for primary healthcare institutions: a discrete choice experiment in China. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072495. [PMID: 37369417 PMCID: PMC10410837 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To quantify the preference of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) for primary healthcare (PHC) institutions in China to redirect the patient flow and improve health outcomes. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. Discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveys asked patients with DM to choose between hypothetical institutions that differed in the medical service capacity, out-of-pocket (OOP) medical costs per month, travel time, the attitude of medical staff and the availability of diabetes drugs. SETTING Shandong province, China. PARTICIPANTS The participants were 887 patients with DM from 36 urban communities and 36 rural villages in Shandong province. One participant did not provide any DCE answers and a further 57 patients failed the internal consistency test. 829 fully completed surveys were included in the final data analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES A mixed logit model was used to calculate the willingness to pay and predict choice probabilities for PHC institution attributes. Preference heterogeneity was also investigated. RESULTS All five attributes were associated with the preferences of patients with DM. The OOP medical costs and the medical service capacity were the most influential attributes. Improvements simultaneously in the attitude of medical staff, drug availability and travel time increased the likelihood of a patient's PHC institution choice. Preferences differed by region, annual household income and duration of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS Our patient preference data may help policymakers improve health services and increase acceptance of choosing PHC institutions. The OOP medical costs and medical service capacity should be regarded as a priority in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuyu Lv
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Center for Health Preference Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jingzhu Qin
- Hospital Office, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, China
| | - Xia Feng
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - ShunPing Li
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Center for Health Preference Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Chengxiang Tang
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business 14 School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Haipeng Wang
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|