1
|
Tierney AA, Mosqueda M, Cesena G, Frehn JL, Payán DD, Rodriguez HP. Telemedicine Implementation for Safety Net Populations: A Systematic Review. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:622-641. [PMID: 37707997 PMCID: PMC10924064 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine systems were rapidly implemented in response to COVID-19. However, little is known about their effectiveness, acceptability, and sustainability for safety net populations. This study systematically reviewed primary care telemedicine implementation and effectiveness in safety net settings. Methods: We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed articles on telemedicine implementation from 2013 to 2021. The search was done between June and December 2021. Included articles focused on health care organizations that primarily serve low-income and/or rural populations in the United States. We screened 244 articles from an initial search of 343 articles and extracted and analyzed data from N = 45 articles. Results: Nine (20%) of 45 articles were randomized controlled trials. N = 22 reported findings for at least one marginalized group (i.e., racial/ethnic minority, 65 years+, limited English proficiency). Only n = 19 (42%) included African American/Black patients in demographics descriptions, n = 14 (31%) LatinX/Hispanic patients, n = 4 (9%) Asian patients, n = 4 (9%) patients aged 65+ years, and n = 4 (9%) patients with limited English proficiency. Results show telemedicine can provide high-quality primary care that is more accessible and affordable. Fifteen studies assessed barriers and facilitators to telemedicine implementation. Common barriers were billing/administrative workflow disruption (n = 9, 20%), broadband access/quality (n = 5, 11%), and patient preference for in-person care (n = 4, 9%). Facilitators included efficiency gains (n = 6, 13%), patient acceptance (n = 3, 7%), and enhanced access (n = 3, 7%). Conclusions: Telemedicine is an acceptable care modality to deliver primary care in safety net settings. Future studies should compare telemedicine and in-person care quality and test strategies to improve telemedicine implementation in safety net settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron A. Tierney
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Mariana Mosqueda
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Gabriel Cesena
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Frehn
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Denise D. Payán
- Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Hector P. Rodriguez
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnsen HM, Øgård-Repål A, Martinez SG, Fangen K, Bårdsen Aas K, Ersfjord EMI. Patients' perceptions of use, needs, and preferences related to a telemedicine solution for HIV care in a Norwegian outpatient clinic: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:209. [PMID: 38360650 PMCID: PMC10870609 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10659-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemedicine in outpatient services for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) was scaled up during the COVID-19 pandemic as services transitioned to remote care. Many studies have reported on the challenges and advantages of telemedicine care during the pandemic. However, there is limited research on the provision of telemedicine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, which entails different telemedicine components and focuses on ways to improve the telemedicine experience for patients. This study aimed to explore PLHIV's perceptions of use, needs, and preferences related to a telemedicine solution for HIV care in an outpatient clinic in Norway. The telemedicine solution included a pre-consultation questionnaire, asynchronous digital messages, and video consultation. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 PLHIV. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS We identified four main themes that covered the participants' perceptions, needs, and preferences: (1) perceived usability, (2) maintaining confidentiality, (3) accommodating personal preferences, and (4) perceived usefulness. Some participants had difficulty logging into the telemedicine solution. Other participants suggested additional functionalities, such as picture sharing and access to test result. Telemedicine care enabled the avoidance of stigmatising clinic experiences, although a few participants reported concerns about confidentiality and data security. Accommodating personal preferences and needs in terms of the type of consultations (in-person or video) and frequency of visits was essential to the participants. With telemedicine care, participants felt more in control of their own lives, perceiving that it increased their perceived quality of life and saved them both time and money for travelling to the clinic. CONCLUSIONS Our study identified several specific needs and preferences related to the assessed technical solution and the provision of current and future telemedicine care services. Nevertheless, the telemedicine solution was perceived as a usable, flexible, and person-centred approach to HIV care, contributing to accommodating the participants' personal preferences. However, healthcare professionals need to ensure that individual requirements and preferences are consistent with evidence-based follow-up and supported by person-centred care. Thus, the practice of shared decision making is important in telemedicine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege Mari Johnsen
- Department of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, 4898, Grimstad, PO Box 509, Norway.
| | - Anita Øgård-Repål
- Department of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, 4898, Grimstad, PO Box 509, Norway
| | - Santiago Gil Martinez
- Department of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, 4898, Grimstad, PO Box 509, Norway
| | - Kim Fangen
- Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | | | - Ellen Margrete Iveland Ersfjord
- Department of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, 4898, Grimstad, PO Box 509, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yelverton V, Gass SJ, Amoatika D, Cooke C, Ostermann J, Natafgi N, Hair NL, Olatosi B, Owens OL, Qiao S, Li X, Derrick C, Weissman S, Albrecht H. The Future of Telehealth in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Provider Perspectives in South Carolina. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2023; 37:459-468. [PMID: 37862076 PMCID: PMC10616939 DOI: 10.1089/apc.2023.0176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
To ensure care continuity during the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has been widely implemented in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care. However, participation in and benefits from telehealth were unequal. This study aims to assess the willingness of people living with HIV (PWH) and HIV care providers to use telehealth and perceptions of the future role of telehealth. In-depth interviews with 18 PWH and 10 HIV care providers from South Carolina assessed their willingness to use telehealth, their perspectives on the future of telehealth in HIV care, and recommendations to improve telehealth. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Most PWH were female (61%), Black/African American (67%), and non-Hispanic (78%). Most PWH (61%) and all providers had used telehealth for HIV care. Most PWH and all providers reported being willing to use or (re-)consider telehealth HIV care services in the future. Providers suggested that telehealth is most suitable for routine HIV care encounters and for established, clinically stable, generally healthy PWH. Attitudes toward telehealth were heterogeneous, with most interviewees valuing telehealth similarly or superior to in-person care, yet >20% perceiving it less valuable. Recommendations to improve telehealth included multilevel strategies to address challenges across four domains: technology, the virtual nature of telehealth, administrative processes, and the sociodemographic profile of PWH. Telehealth in HIV care is here to stay; however, it may not yet be suitable for all PWH and all care encounters. Decision processes related to telehealth versus in-person care need to involve providers and PWH. Existing telehealth options require multilevel adjustments addressing persistent challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Yelverton
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Salome-Joelle Gass
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel Amoatika
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher Cooke
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jan Ostermann
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nabil Natafgi
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nicole L. Hair
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Bankole Olatosi
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Otis L. Owens
- College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shan Qiao
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Xiaoming Li
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Caroline Derrick
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Prisma Health Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sharon Weissman
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Prisma Health Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Helmut Albrecht
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Prisma Health Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McKay E, Ojukwu E, Hirani S, Sotindjo T, Okedo-Alex I, Magagula P. How the COVID-19 Pandemic Influenced HIV Care: Are We Prepared Enough for Future Pandemics? An Assessment of Factors Influencing Access, Utilization, Affordability, and Motivation to Engage with HIV Services amongst African, Caribbean, and Black Women. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6051. [PMID: 37297655 PMCID: PMC10252676 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20116051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in disruption in healthcare delivery for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). African, Caribbean, and Black women living with HIV (ACB WLWH) in British Columbia (BC) faced barriers to engage with HIV care services prior to the COVID-19 pandemic that were intensified by the transition to virtual care during the pandemic. This paper aims to assess which factors influenced ACB WLWH's access to, utilization and affordability of, and motivation to engage with HIV care services. This study utilized a qualitative descriptive approach using in-depth interviews. Eighteen participants were recruited from relevant women's health, HIV, and ACB organizations in BC. Participants felt dismissed by healthcare providers delivering services only in virtual formats and suggested that services be performed in a hybrid model to increase access and utilization. Mental health supports, such as support groups, dissolved during the pandemic and overall utilization decreased for many participants. The affordability of services pertained primarily to expenses not covered by the provincial healthcare plan. Resources should be directed to covering supplements, healthy food, and extended health services. The primary factor decreasing motivation to engage with HIV services was fear, which emerged due to the unknown impact of the COVID-19 virus on immunocompromised participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily McKay
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada; (E.M.); (S.H.)
| | - Emmanuela Ojukwu
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada; (E.M.); (S.H.)
| | - Saima Hirani
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada; (E.M.); (S.H.)
| | - Tatiana Sotindjo
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada;
- B.C. Women’s Hospital & Health Centre, Vancouver, BC V6H 2N9, Canada
| | - Ijeoma Okedo-Alex
- School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada;
| | | |
Collapse
|