Natriuretic peptides for the detection of diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Biomarkers in heart failure: a focus on natriuretic peptides

While progress has been made in the management of most aspects of cardiovascular disease, the incidence and prevalence of heart failure (HF) remains high. HF affects around a million people in the UK and has a worse prognosis than most cancers. Patients with HF are often elderly with complex comorbidities, making accurate assessment of HF challenging. A timely diagnosis and initiation of evidence-based treatments are key to prevent hospitalisation and improve outcomes in this population. Biomarkers have dramatically impacted the way patients with HF are evaluated and managed. The most studied biomarkers in HF are natriuretic peptides (NPs). Since their discovery in the 1980s, there has been an explosion of work in the field of NPs and they have become an important clinical tool used in everyday practice to guide diagnosis and prognostic assessment of patients with HF. In this article, we will review the physiology of NPs and study their biological effects. Then, we will discuss the role of NPs in the diagnosis, management and prognostication of patients with HF. We will also explore the role of NPs as a potential therapeutic agent.

Epidemiology of heart failure in diabetes: a disease in disguise

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) without symptoms, and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent the most common phenotypes of HF in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and are more common than HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in these individuals. However, diagnostic criteria for HF have changed over the years, resulting in heterogeneity in the prevalence/incidence rates reported in different studies. We aimed to give an overview of the diagnosis and epidemiology of HF in type 2 diabetes, using both a narrative and systematic review approach; we focus narratively on diagnosing (using the 2021 European Society of Cardiology [ESC] guidelines) and screening for HF in type 2 diabetes. We performed an updated (2016-October 2022) systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence and incidence of HF subtypes in adults ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes, using echocardiographic data. Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched and data were assessed using random-effects meta-analyses, with findings presented as forest plots. From the 5015 studies found, 209 were screened using the full-text article. In total, 57 studies were included, together with 29 studies that were identified in a prior meta-analysis; these studies reported on the prevalence of LVSD (n=25 studies, 24,460 individuals), LVDD (n=65 studies, 25,729 individuals), HFrEF (n=4 studies, 4090 individuals), HFmrEF (n=2 studies, 2442 individuals) and/or HFpEF (n=8 studies, 5292 individuals), and on HF incidence (n=7 studies, 17,935 individuals). Using Hoy et al's risk-of-bias tool, we found that the studies included generally had a high risk of bias. They showed a prevalence of 43% (95% CI 37%, 50%) for LVDD, 17% (95% CI 7%, 35%) for HFpEF, 6% (95% CI 3%, 10%) for LVSD, 7% (95% CI 3%, 15%) for HFrEF, and 12% (95% CI 7%, 22%) for HFmrEF. For LVDD, grade I was found to be most prevalent. Additionally, we reported a higher incidence rate of HFpEF (7% [95% CI 4%, 11%]) than HFrEF 4% [95% CI 3%, 7%]). The evidence is limited by the heterogeneity of the diagnostic criteria over the years. The systematic section of this review provides new insights on the prevalence/incidence of HF in type 2 diabetes, unveiling a large pre-clinical target group with LVDD/HFpEF in which disease progression could be halted by early recognition and treatment.Registration PROSPERO ID CRD42022368035.

Novel Strategies in Diagnosing Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent global condition affecting approximately 50% of the HF population. With the aging of the worldwide population, its incidence and prevalence are expected to rise even further. Unfortunately, until recently, no effective medications were available to reduce the high mortality and hospitalization rates associated with HFpEF, making it a significant unmet need in cardiovascular medicine. Although HFpEF is commonly defined as HF with normal ejection fraction and elevated left ventricular filling pressure, performing invasive hemodynamic assessments on every individual suspected of having HFpEF is neither feasible nor practical. Consequently, several clinical criteria and diagnostic tools have been proposed to aid in diagnosing HFpEF. Overall, these criteria and tools are designed to assist healthcare professionals in identifying and evaluating patients who may have HFpEF based on a combination of signs, symptoms, biomarkers, and non-invasive imaging findings. By employing these non-invasive diagnostic approaches, clinicians can make informed decisions regarding the best pharmacological and rehabilitation strategies for individuals with suspected HFpEF. This literature review aims to provide an overview of all currently available methods for diagnosing and monitoring this disabling condition.

The WATCH-DM risk score estimates clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

The coexistence of heart failure is frequent and associated with higher mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and its management is a critical issue. The WATCH-DM risk score is a tool to predict heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We investigated whether it could estimate outcomes in T2DM patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The WATCH-DM risk score was calculated in 418 patients with T2DM hospitalized for HFpEF (male 49.5%, age 80 ± 9 years, HbA1c 6.8 ± 1.0%), and they were divided into the "average or lower" (≤ 10 points), "high" (11-13 points) and "very high" (≥ 14 points) risk groups. We followed patients to observe all-cause death for 386 days (median). We compared the area under the curve (AUC) of the WATCH-DM score for predicting 1-year mortality with that of the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score and of the Barcelona Bio-Heart Failure Risk (BCN Bio-HF). Among the study patients, 108 patients (25.8%) had average or lower risk scores, 147 patients (35.2%) had high risk scores, and 163 patients (39.0%) had very high risk scores. The Cox proportional hazard model selected the WATCH-DM score as an independent predictor of all-cause death (HR per unit 1.10, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19), and the "average or lower" risk group had lower mortality than the other groups (p = 0.047 by log-rank test). The AUC of the WATCH-DM for 1-year mortality was 0.64 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.74), which was not different from that of the MAGGIC score (0.72, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.80, p = 0.08) or that of BCN Bio-HF (0.70, 0.61 to 0.80, p = 0.25). The WATCH-DM risk score can estimate prognosis in T2DM patients with HFpEF and can identify patients at higher risk of mortality.

Comprehensive diagnostic workup in patients with suspected heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can be challenging and it could require different tests, some of which are affected by limited availability. Nowadays, considering that new therapies are available for HFpEF and related conditions, a prompt and correct diagnosis is relevant. However, the diagnostic role of biomarker level, imaging tools, score-based algorithms and invasive evaluation, should be based on the strengths and weaknesses of each test. The aim of this review is to help the clinician in diagnosing HFpEF, overcoming the diagnostic uncertainty and disentangling among the different underlying causes, in order to properly treat this kind of patient.

The Atrial Natriuretic Peptide-to-brain Natriuretic Peptide Ratio Predicts Left Atrial Reverse Remodeling after Rhythm Control Therapy in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Objective The association between natriuretic peptide levels in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with advanced left atrial (LA) remodeling and reverse remodeling after rhythm control therapy has not been clarified. The present study assessed the role of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements to predict LA reverse remodeling after catheter ablation (CA) in persistent AF patients with LA enlargement. Methods This study included 88 persistent AF patients with LA enlargement (volume index >48 mL/m2) who underwent CA. Plasma ANP and BNP levels were analyzed before CA in all patients. The study population was divided into 2 groups according to the extent of decrease in the LA volume index (LAVI) at 6 months after CA responders were those with a ≥15% reduction in the LAVI, and all others were non-responders. Results At follow-up, 58 patients (66%) were classified as responders. The preprocedural ANP level was significantly higher in the responders than in the non-responders (p=0.03). Furthermore, the ANP-to-BNP ratio (ANP/BNP) was significantly higher in the responders than in the non-responders (p<0.01). The ANP/BNP was correlated with the percentage decrease in the LAVI (r=0.391, p<0.01). A multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the ANP/BNP before CA was an independent predictor of LA reverse remodeling (p<0.01). Conclusion The preprocedural ANP/BNP was a robust predictor of reverse remodeling of the enlarged LA after sinus rhythm restoration by rhythm control therapy in persistent AF patients.

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Evolving Understanding

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome in which patients have signs and symptoms of HF due to high left ventricular (LV) filling pressure despite normal or near normal LV ejection fraction. It is more common than HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and its diagnosis and treatment are more challenging than HFrEF. Although hypertension is the primary risk factor, coronary artery disease and other comorbidities, such as atrial fibrillation (AF), diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and obesity, also play an essential role in its formation. This review summarizes current knowledge about HFpEF, its pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, current treatments, and promising novel treatments. It is essential to continue to be updated on the latest treatments for HFpEF so that patients always receive the most therapeutic treatments. The use of GnRH agonists in the management of HFpEF, infusion of Apo a-I nanoparticle, low-level transcutaneous vagal stimulation (LLTS), and estrogen only in post-menopausal women are promising strategies to prevent diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF; however, there is still no proven curative treatment for HFpEF yet.

Evaluation of Analytical Performances and Comparison of 3 NT-proBNP Assays for Diagnosing Heart Failure

CONTEXT.—

The N-terminal prohormone of the brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a major diagnostic biomarker for heart failure.

OBJECTIVE.—

To compare the analytical and clinical performance of 3 NT-proBNP immunoassays: the Atellica IM NT-proBNP assay (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics), the Alere NT-proBNP assay (Abbott Laboratories), and the Elecsys proBNP II assay (Roche Diagnostics).

DESIGN.—

For the Atellica IM NT-proBNP assay, analytical performance, including precision, linearity, and carryover, was fully evaluated. Method comparisons among the 3 assays were performed using the Passing-Bablok regression and the κ agreement test. To evaluate the clinical performance of the assays, 160 patient samples were used from patients with (n = 81) or without (n = 79) heart failure.

RESULTS.—

The analytical performance of the Atellica IM NT-proBNP assay was acceptable according to the manufacturer's claims. The Atellica IM NT-proBNP assay showed a positive bias compared with the Elecsys proBNP II assay. The Cohen κ values among the 3 assays were satisfactory (>0.80) and comparable. There were no significant differences in areas under the curve. However, for the diagnosis of heart failure, the Elecsys proBNP II showed a higher specificity and positive likelihood ratio than the other assays.

CONCLUSIONS.—

All 3 NT-proBNP assays showed acceptable concordance, and their clinical performance was comparable. However, the Elecsys proBNP II might be a more discriminating NT-proBNP assay to diagnose heart failure.

An update on utilising brain natriuretic peptide for risk stratification, monitoring and guiding therapy in heart failure

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) is a dominant health problem with an overall poor prognosis. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are upregulated in HF as a compensatory mechanism. They have extensively been used for diagnosis and risk stratification.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses the history and physiology of NPs in order to understand their current role in clinical practice. It further provides a detailed and updated narrative review on the utility of those biomarkers for risk stratification, monitoring, and guiding therapy in HF.

EXPERT OPINION

NPs show excellent predictive ability in heart failure patients, both in acute and chronic settings. Understanding their pathophysiology and their modifications in specific situations is key for an adequate interpretation in specific clinical scenarios in which their prognostic value may be weaker or less well evaluated. To better promote risk stratification in HF, NPs should be integrated with other predictive tools to develop multiparametric risk models. Both inequalities of access to NPs and evidence caveats and limitations will need to be addressed by future research in the coming years.

Plasma levels of bone morphogenic protein-4 are downregulated in elderly hypertensive patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between plasma bone morphogenic protein-4 (BMP-4) levels and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) in elderly hypertensive patients.

METHODS

A total of 222 hypertensive individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled from October 2021 to July 2022. Data were collected including clinical characteristics, laboratory tests and echocardiogram measurements. Plasma BMP-4 levels were tested using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis.

RESULTS

Among 222 elderly hypertensive patients, 149 were without HF, 59 had HFpEF, and 14 had HFmrEF. Plasma BMP-4 levels were strikingly downregulated in hypertensive patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF [median (25th, 75th percentile): 15.89 (7.69, 23.12) pg/mL vs. 19.67 (10.60, 33.04) pg/mL; P = 0.002]. After univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, the risk of HFpEF/HFmrEF was declined in the 4th quartile BMP-4 group when compared with the 1st quartile BMP-4 group (odds ratio, 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04 to 1.00; P = 0.050, P for trend = 0.025). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that BMP-4 ≤ 28.5 pg/mL exhibited a sensitivity of 95.9% and a specificity of 28.2% in HFpEF/HFmrEF diagnosis. Furthermore, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.619 (95% CI:0.540-0.698, P < 0.001). The corresponding AUC for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was 0.781 (95% CI: 0.710-0.852), P < 0.001. Adding BMP-4 to BNP increased the AUC to 0.790 (95% CI: 0.724-0.856), vs. BMP-4, P < 0.001; vs. BNP, P = 0.730, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma BMP-4 levels are downregulated in elderly hypertensive patients with HFpEF. BMP-4 is a promising biomarker for diagnosing HFpEF/HFmrEF during hypertension.

Laboratory and Metabolomic Fingerprint in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: From Clinical Classification to Biomarker Signature

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a poorly characterized syndrome with many unknown aspects related to different patient profiles, various associated risk factors and a wide range of aetiologies. It comprises several pathophysiological pathways, such as endothelial dysfunction, myocardial fibrosis, extracellular matrix deposition and intense inflammatory system activation. Until now, HFpEF has only been described with regard to clinical features and its most commonly associated risk factors, disregarding all biological mechanisms responsible for cardiovascular deteriorations. Recently, innovations in laboratory and metabolomic findings have shown that HFpEF appears to be strictly related to specific cells and molecular mechanisms' dysregulation. Indeed, some biomarkers are efficient in early identification of these processes, adding new insights into diagnosis and risk stratification. Moreover, recent advances in intermediate metabolites provide relevant information on intrinsic cellular and energetic substrate alterations. Therefore, a systematic combination of clinical imaging and laboratory findings may lead to a 'precision medicine' approach providing prognostic and therapeutic advantages. The current review reports traditional and emerging biomarkers in HFpEF and it purposes a new diagnostic approach based on integrative information achieved from risk factor burden, hemodynamic dysfunction and biomarkers' signature partnership.

Diagnostic performance of microRNAs in the detection of heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Chronic heart failure (CHF) can be classified as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Currently, there is an unmet need for a minimally invasive diagnostic tool for different forms of CHF. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) for the detection of different CHF forms via a systematic review and meta-analysis approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Comprehensive search on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE identified 45 relevant studies which were used for qualitative assessment. Out of these, 29 studies were used for qualitative and quantitative assessment and allowed to identify a miRNA panel able to detect HFrEF and HFpEF with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 and 0.79, respectively. A panel of eight miRNAs (hsa-miR-18b-3p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-22-3p, hsa-miR-92b-3p, hsa-miR-129-5p, hsa-miR-320a-5p, hsa-miR-423-5p, and hsa-miR-675-5p) detected HFrEF cases with a sensitivity of 0.85, specificity of 0.88 and AUC of 0.91. A panel of seven miRNAs (hsa-miR-19b-3p, hsa-miR-30c-5p, hsa-miR-206, hsa-miR-221-3p, hsa-miR-328-5p, hsa-miR-375-3p, and hsa-miR-424-5p) identified HFpEF cases with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.61.

CONCLUSIONS

Although conventional biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and B-type natriuretic peptide) presented a better performance in detecting CHF patients, the results presented here pointed towards specific miRNA panels with potential additive values to circulating natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis of different classes of CHF. Equally important, miRNAs alone showed a reasonable capacity for 'ruling out' patients with HFrEF or HFpEF. Additional studies with large populations are required to confirm the diagnostic potential of miRNAs for sub-classes of CHF.

Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Aim – to determine the frequency of myocardial dysfunction using echocardiography with speckle tracking (STE) method, the relationship between a low global longitudinal strain (GLS) with the level of NT-proBNP, clinical and laboratory manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis. Material and methods. The study included 43 patients with RA (ACR/EULAR criteria, 2010): 79% women, age – 53.0 [38.0; 63.0] years, disease duration – 60.0 [36; 180] months; DAS28 – 5.9 [5.2; 6.4], positive for ACCP (74%), RF IgM (81%), without prior biological therapy and CVD. Methotrexate was received by 44%, leflunomide – 35%, sulfasalazine – 9.3%, hydroxychloroquine – 7%, glucocorticoids – 67.4%, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs – 74% of patients with RA. All RA patients underwent echocardiography – tissue Doppler and STE. The level of NT-proBNP was determined in the blood serum The normal range for NT-proBNP was less than 125 pg/ml.

Results. Low GLS was observed in 26 (61%) patients with RA. RA patients had a decrease GLS, E LV, E’ LV, E/A LV compared with the control group. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) was higher in RA patients (13 (31%) vs 0%). Patients with RA had significantly higher levels of NT-proBNP (114.8 [45.1; 277.5] and 52 [40.5; 69.1] pg/ml) compared with the control group. There were correlations between a low GLS and DAS28 (r=0.9), the number of painful joints (r=0.6), radiological stage (r=0.6) and the presence of systemic manifestations (r=0.5), age (r=–0.9), E LV velocity (r=–0.5) (p<0.05 in all cases). There were correlations between the level of NT-proBNP and the E/A LV ratio (r=–0.4), A LV velocity (r=0.5) (p><0.05 in all cases).>< 0.05 in all cases). There were correlations between the level of NT-proBNP and the E/A LV ratio (r=–0.4), A LV velocity (r=0.5) (p< 0.05 in all cases).

Conclusions. In RA patients with a high frequency the low GLS LV was detected, which is associated with a high activity of the inflammatory process. STE helps to detect myocardial dysfunction in patients with RA at earlier stages than tissue Doppler. The use of STE, the determination of the level of NT-proBNP make it possible to diagnosing preclinical disorders of systolic and diastolic functions of the LV, which can contribute to the early initiation of therapy and improve the prognosis in this category of patients.

Biomarkers of HFpEF: Natriuretic Peptides, High-Sensitivity Troponins and Beyond

Heart failure (HF) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex syndrome, often participated by several cardiac and extracardiac conditions, including chronic kidney disease, pulmonary disease, anaemia and advanced age. Circulating biomarkers reflecting pathophysiological pathways involved in HFpEF development and progression may assist clinicians in early diagnosis and management of this condition. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are cardioprotective hormones released by cardiomyocytes in response to pressure or volume overload and in response to activation of neuro-endocrine-immune system. The relevance of B-type NP (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type NP (NT-proBNP) for diagnosis and risk stratification has been extensively demonstrated, and these biomarkers are emerging tools for population screening and as guides to the start of treatment in subclinical HF. On the contrary, conflicting evidence exists on the value of NPs to guide HF therapy. Among the other biomarkers, high-sensitivity troponins and soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 are the most promising biomarkers for risk stratification, predicting outcome independently from NPs. In this review, some novel biomarkers are being tested in such clinical scenario, more tightly linked to specific pathophysiological processes of cardiac damage.

Exosomal microRNAs miR-30d-5p and miR-126a-5p Are Associated with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in STZ-Induced Type 1 Diabetic Rats

Exosomal microRNAs (EXO-miRNAs) are promising non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for cardiovascular disease. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a poorly understood cardiovascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Little is known about whether EXO-miRNAs can be used as biomarkers for HFpEF in DM. We aimed to investigate the relationship between EXO-miRNAs and HFpEF in STZ-induced diabetic rats. We prepared STZ-induced diabetic rats exhibiting a type 1 DM phenotype with low body weight, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and hypoinsulinemia. Histological sections confirmed atrophy and fibrosis of the heart, with collagen accumulation representing diabetic cardiomyopathy. Significant decreases in end-diastolic volume, stroke volume, stroke work, end-systolic elastance and cardiac output indicated impaired cardiac contractility, as well as mRNA conversion of two isoforms of myosin heavy chain (α-MHC and β-MHC) and increased atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) mRNA indicating heart failure, were consistent with the features of HFpEF. In diabetic HFpEF rats, we examined a selected panel of 12 circulating miRNAs associated with HF (miR-1-3p, miR-21-5p, miR-29a-5p, miR-30d-5p, miR-34a-5p, miR-126a-5p, miR-143-3p, miR-145-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-206-3p, miR-320-3p and miR-378-3p). Although they were all expressed at significantly lower levels in the heart compared to non-diabetic controls, only six miRNAs (miR-21-5p, miR-30d-5p, miR-126a-5p, miR-206-3p, miR-320-3p and miR-378-3p) were also reduced in exosomal content, while one miRNA (miR-34a-5p) was upregulated. Similarly, although all miRNAs were correlated with reduced cardiac output as a measure of cardiovascular performance, only three miRNAs (miR-30d-5p, miR-126a-5p and miR-378-3p) were correlated in exosomal content. We found that miR-30d-5p and miR-126a-5p remained consistently correlated with significant reductions in exosomal expression, cardiac expression and cardiac output. Our findings support their release from the heart and association with diabetic HFpEF. We propose that these two EXO-miRNAs may be important for the development of diagnostic tools for diabetic HFpEF.

Biomarkers in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous disorder developing from multiple aetiologies with overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms. HFpEF diagnosis may be challenging, as neither cardiac imaging nor physical examination are sensitive in this situation. Here, we review biomarkers of HFpEF, of which the best supported are related to myocardial stretch and injury, including natriuretic peptides and cardiac troponins. An overview of biomarkers of inflammation, extracellular matrix derangements and fibrosis, senescence, vascular dysfunction, anaemia/iron deficiency and obesity is also provided. Finally, novel biomarkers from -omics technologies, including plasma metabolites and circulating microRNAs, are outlined briefly. A cardiac-centred approach to HFpEF diagnosis using natriuretic peptides seems reasonable at present in clinical practice. A holistic approach including biomarkers that provide information on the non-cardiac components of the HFpEF syndrome may enrich our understanding of the disease and may be useful in classifying HFpEF phenotypes or endotypes that may guide patient selection in HFpEF trials.

Microvascular Dysfunction in Skeletal Muscle Precedes Myocardial Vascular Changes in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Sex-Dependent Differences

Aim

To uncover sex-related microvascular abnormalities that underlie the early presentation of reduced perfusion in leg skeletal muscle in a type II rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Methods and Results

Diabetes was induced using a non-obese, diet-based, low-dose streptozotocin model in adult female (18 diabetic, 9 control) and male rats (29 diabetic, 11 control). Time-course monitoring over 12 months following diabetes induction was performed using echocardiography, treadmill exercise, photoacoustic imaging, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), histopathology, and immunohistochemistry. Diabetic rats maintained normal weights. Hypertension appeared late in both diabetic males (7 months) and females (10 months), while only diabetic males had elevated cholesterol (7 months). On echocardiography, all diabetic animals maintained normal ejection fraction and exhibited diastolic dysfunction, mild systolic dysfunction, and a slightly enlarged left ventricle. Exercise tolerance declined progressively and early in males (4 months), later in females (8 months); FMD showed lower baseline femoral arterial flow but unchanged reactivity in both sexes (5 months); and photoacoustic imaging showed lower tissue oxygen saturation in the legs of diabetic males (4 months) and diabetic females (10 months). Myocardial perfusion was normal in both sexes. Histopathology at the final timepoint of Month 10 (males) and Month 12 (females) revealed that myocardial microvasculature was normal in both vessel density and structure, thus explaining normal perfusion on imaging. However, leg muscle microvasculature exhibited perivascular smooth muscle thickening around small arterioles in diabetic females and around large arterioles in diabetic males, explaining the depressed readings on photoacoustic and FMD. Histology also confirmed the absence of commonly reported HFpEF markers, including microvessel rarefaction, myocardial fibrosis, and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Conclusion

Exercise intolerance manifesting early in the progression of diabetic cardiomyopathy can be attributed to decreased perfusion to the leg skeletal muscle due to perivascular smooth muscle thickening around small arterioles in females and large arterioles in males. This microvascular abnormality was absent in the myocardium, where perfusion levels remained normal throughout the study. We conclude that although skeletal muscle microvascular dysfunction of the vasculature presents at different levels depending on sex, it consistently presents early in both sexes prior to overt cardiac changes such as rarefaction, fibrosis, or hypertrophy.

The Value of Passive Leg Raise During Right Heart Catheterization in Diagnosing Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Because of limited accuracy of noninvasive tests, diastolic stress testing plays an important role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Exercise right heart catheterization is considered the gold standard and indicated when HFpEF is suspected but left ventricular filling pressures at rest are normal. However, performing exercise during right heart catheterization is not universally available. Here, we examined whether pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during a passive leg raise (PLR) could be used as simple and accurate method to diagnose or rule out occult-HFpEF.

METHODS

In our tertiary center for pulmonary hypertension and HFpEF, all patients who received a diagnostic right heart catheterization with PCWP-measurements at rest, PLR, and exercise were evaluated (2014-2020). The diagnostic value of PCWP_PLR was compared with the gold standard (PCWP_EXERCISE). Cut-offs derived from our cohort were subsequently validated in an external cohort (N=74).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine non-HFpEF, 33 occult-HFpEF, and 37 manifest-HFpEF patients were included (N=109). In patients with normal PCWP_REST (<15 mmHg), PCWP_PLR significantly improved diagnostic accuracy compared with PCWP_REST (AUC=0.82 versus 0.69, P=0.03). PCWP_PLR ≥19 mmHg (24% of cases) had a specificity of 100% for diagnosing occult-HFpEF, irrespective of diuretic use. PCWP_PLR ≥11 mmHg had a 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value for diagnosing occult-HFpEF. Both cut-offs retained a 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity in the external cohort. Absolute change in PCWP_PLR or V-wave derived parameters had no incremental value in diagnosing occult-HFpEF.

CONCLUSIONS

PCWP_PLR is a simple and powerful tool that can help to diagnose or rule out occult-HFpEF.

Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of current biomarkers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A number of circulating biomarkers are currently utilized for the diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, due to HFpEF heterogeneity, the accuracy of these biomarkers remains unclear.

AIMS

This study aimed to systematically determine the diagnostic accuracy of currently available biomarkers for chronic HFpEF.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases were searched systematically to identify studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers of chronic HFpEF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%. All included studies were independently assessed for quality and relevant information was extracted. Random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of HFpEF biomarkers.

RESULTS

The search identified 6145 studies, of which 19 were included. Four biomarkers were available for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (0.787, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.719-0.842) was higher than that of N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) (0.696, 95% CI 0.599-0.779) in chronic HFpEF diagnosis. However, NT-proBNP showed improved specificity (0.882, 95% CI 0.778-0.941) compared to BNP (\0.796, 95% CI 0.672-0.882). Galectin-3 (Gal-3) exhibited a reliable diagnostic adequacy for HFpEF (sensitivity 0.760, 95% CI 0.631-0.855; specificity 0.803, 95% CI 0.667-0.893). However, suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (ST2) displayed limited diagnostic performance for chronic HFpEF diagnosis (sensitivity 0.636, 95% CI 0.465-0.779; specificity 0.595, 95% CI 0.427-0.743).

CONCLUSION

NT-proBNP and BNP appear to be the most reliable biomarkers in chronic HFpEF with NT-proBNP showing higher specificity and BNP showing higher sensitivity. Although Gal-3 appears more reliable than ST2 in HFpEF diagnosis, the conclusions are limited as only three studies were included in this meta-analysis.

Validation of the 2016 ASE/EACVI Guideline for Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Unexplained Dyspnea and a Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background

Echocardiography is considered the cornerstone of the diagnostic workup of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Thus far, validation of the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) echo‐algorithm for evaluation of diastolic (dys)function in a patient suspected of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has been limited.

Methods and Results

The diagnostic performance of the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm was assessed in 204 patients evaluated for unexplained dyspnea or pulmonary hypertension with echocardiogram and right heart catheterization. Invasively measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was used as the gold standard. In addition, the diagnostic performance of H₂FPEF score and NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) were evaluated. There was a poor correlation between indexed left atrial volume, E/e′ (septal and average) or early mitral inflow (E), and PCWP (r=0.25–0.30, P values all <0.01). No correlation was found in our cohort between e′ (septal or lateral) or tricuspid valve regurgitation and PCWP. The correlation between diastolic function grades of the ASE/EACVI algorithm and PCWP was poor (r=0.17, P<0.05). The ASE/EACVI algorithm had a sensitivity and specificity of 35% and 87%, respectively; an accuracy of 67% and an area under the curve of 0.56. Moreover, in 30% of cases the algorithm was not applicable or indeterminate. H₂FPEF score had a modest correlation with PCWP (r=0.44, P<0.0001), and accuracy was 73%; NT‐proBNP correlated weakly with PCWP (r=0.24, P<0.001), and accuracy was 57%.

Conclusions

The 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm for the assessment of diastolic function has a limited diagnostic accuracy in patients evaluated for unexplained dyspnea and/or pulmonary hypertension, and especially sensitivity to detect diastolic dysfunction was low.