1
|
Liu Y, Hu X, Lv W, Xu Y. A case report of adenomyosis-induced spontaneous rupture in an unscarred and unpregnant uterus. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e41037. [PMID: 39705471 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000041037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2024] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Spontaneous uterine rupture, although rare, is a life-threatening obstetric emergency with a high maternal and fetal mortality rate. It can occur without warning, leading to severe complications, including hemorrhage, shock, and fetal demise. The risk factors contributing to uterine rupture are diverse and include a history of uterine surgery (such as cesarean section), trauma to the uterus, abnormal uterine contractions during labor, and underlying conditions like adenomyosis. Identifying and understanding these risk factors are crucial for early detection, timely intervention, and improved outcomes in affected pregnancies. PATIENT CONCERNS Here, we report an exceptionally rare case of spontaneous uterine rupture triggered by adenomyosis in a 34-year-old unmarried and nulliparous woman with no prior scarring or pregnancy. Physical examination revealed abdominal distension, with the uterine fundus at the level of the umbilicus, exhibiting hardness, tenderness upon palpation, and rebound tenderness. Ultrasonography and computerized tomography scans suggested adenomyosis and uterine rupture. During surgery, a rupture was discovered in the left basal layer of the uterus, with a rupture diameter of approximately 3 cm. Additionally, there were multiple internal endometrial lesions in the uterorectal pouch. DIAGNOSES Adenomyosis-induced spontaneous uterine rupture. INTERVENTIONS The procedures performed included excision of adenomyotic lesions, repair of the uterine rupture, and electrocoagulation of endometriotic lesions in the pelvic cavity. OUTCOMES At the 1-month post-surgery follow-up examination, the patient showed good recovery, with no signs of complications. She was able to resume normal daily activities without difficulty. The surgical site was healing well, with no signs of infection or abnormal scarring. Ultrasound and clinical assessments confirmed the resolution of pelvic fluid accumulation, and uterine function appeared to be intact. The patient was advised to continue regular follow-up visits to monitor her recovery and ensure long-term well-being. LESSONS First, uterine rupture caused by adenomyosis in a nonpregnant, scarless uterus is extremely rare but still possible. When patients with severe adenomyosis present with abdominal pain and pelvic fluid, obstetricians and gynecologists should consider the possibility of uterine rupture. Second, ultrasound examination can quickly and accurately diagnose both adenomyosis and uterine rupture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoling Hu
- Department of Ultrasound, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wen Lv
- Department of Gynecology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yingzi Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arecco L, Borea R, Magaton IM, Janković K, Mariamizde E, Stana M, Scavone G, Ottonello S, Spinaci S, Genova C, de Azambuja E, Lambertini M. Current practices in oncofertility counseling: updated evidence on fertility preservation and post-treatment pregnancies in young women affected by early breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:803-817. [PMID: 38913581 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2372337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anticancer treatments have significantly contributed to increasing cure rates of breast cancer in the last years; however, they can also lead to short- and long-term side effects, including gonadotoxicity, and compromised fertility in young women. Oncofertility is a crucial issue for young patients who have not yet completed their family planning at the time of cancer diagnosis. AREAS COVERED This review aims to cover all the latest available evidence in the field of oncofertility, including the gonadotoxicity of currently adopted anticancer therapies in the curative breast cancer setting, the available strategies for fertility preservation and the feasibility of achieving a pregnancy following anticancer treatment completion. EXPERT OPINION Over the past years, a significant progress has been made in oncofertility care for young women with breast cancer. In the context of the currently available evidence, every young woman with newly diagnosed breast cancer should receive a proper and complete oncofertility counseling before starting any anticancer treatment to increase her chances of future pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roberto Borea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Isotta Martha Magaton
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Elene Mariamizde
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Todua Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Mihaela Stana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elysee Hospital, Alba Iulia, Romania
| | - Graziana Scavone
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Ottonello
- Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- ASL3 Breast Unit Department, Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Genova
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dellino M, D’Amato A, Battista G, Cormio G, Vimercati A, Loizzi V, Laganà AS, Damiani GR, Favilli A, Gerli S, La Forgia D, Daniele A, Agrifoglio V, Cicinelli E, Vitagliano A, Etrusco A. Reproductive outcomes in women with BRCA 1/2 germline mutations: A retrospective observational study and literature review. Open Med (Wars) 2024; 19:20249999. [PMID: 39176249 PMCID: PMC11340857 DOI: 10.1515/med-2024-9999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the reproductive outcomes of patients bearing BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations. Methods In this retrospective observational cohort study, we assessed data from BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 carriers, analyzing demographics, oncological history, and reproductive outcomes. Statistical analysis compared BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 carriers. A thorough review of the literature was carried out. Results Fifty-eight patients were included. BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations were equally distributed. Eighty-nine pregnancies occurred in our series, hesitated in 73 live births and 19 miscarriages. Mean age at first and last pregnancy was 27.8 ± 4.8 and 31.6 ± 4.8 years old. Thirty-nine patients have had at least one live birth (67.2%). Mean number of live births was 1.9 ± 0.6. Live birth rate (LBR) was 81.1% and miscarriage rate was 32.8%. Spontaneous fertility was unaltered, as evidenced by high LBR. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 carriers. Conclusions Our results shows that spontaneous reproductive outcomes in BRCA-mutated patients are reassuring. Despite evidence indicating a decrease in ovarian reserve among BRCA patients, this factor seems to not impact spontaneous fertility negatively. Further research is needed, and individuals with BRCA mutations should consider early family planning and fertility preservation in case of partner absence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Dellino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio D’Amato
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Gaia Battista
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124Bari, Italy
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Vimercati
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Vera Loizzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124Bari, Italy
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Paolo Giaccone” Hospital, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo,
90127Palermo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Raffaello Damiani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Favilli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia,
06132Perugia, Italy
| | - Sandro Gerli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia,
06132Perugia, Italy
| | - Daniele La Forgia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Daniele
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Vittorio Agrifoglio
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Paolo Giaccone” Hospital, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo,
90127Palermo, Italy
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Amerigo Vitagliano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Etrusco
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Paolo Giaccone” Hospital, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo,
90127Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Holtzman S, McCarthy L, Estevez SL, Lee JA, Baird MF, Gounko D, Copperman AB, Blank SV. Walking the tightrope: Fertility preservation among hereditary breast and ovarian Cancer syndrome Previvors. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 186:176-181. [PMID: 38696905 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fertility-related concerns cause significant anxiety among patients with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC). The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommend patients diagnosed with HBOC receive early referral to a reproductive endocrinologist. However, evidence about fertility trends in this patient population are limited and guidelines are scarce. The aim of this study is to compare fertility preservation among patients with HBOC to control patients undergoing fertility treatment without a diagnosis of infertility. METHODS This retrospective study included patients who presented to a single academic institution for fertility preservation in the setting of diagnosis of HBOC. In this study, HBOC patients are referred to as those who had tested positive for pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or were at high-risk for HBOC based on a strong family history (defined as >3 family members diagnosed with HBOC) without a genetic mutation. HBOC patients were matched in a 1:1 fashion to a control group undergoing fertility preservation without a diagnosis of infertility or HBOC. All analysis was done using SPSS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS Between August 1st, 2016 and August 1st, 2022, 81 patients presented to the study center for consultation in the setting of HBOC. Of those who presented, 48 (59.2%) ultimately underwent oocyte cryopreservation and 33 (40.7%) underwent embryo cryopreservation. Patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation due to BRCA1 status were more likely to present for fertility consultation at a younger age compared to control patients (32.6 vs. 34.7 years, p = 0.03) and were more likely to undergo oocyte cryopreservation at a younger age (32.1 vs. 34.6 years, p = 0.007). There was no difference in age at initial consultation or age at procedure for patients with BRCA2 or patients with a strong family history compared to control patients (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the mean age of patients with HBOC at presentation for consultation for embryo cryopreservation or the mean age the patient with HBOC underwent embryo cryopreservation compared to control patients (p > 0.05). Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 did not have expedited time from consultation to first cycle start (p > 0.05). After adjusting for factors including anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and age, patients considered in the HBOC group due to family history had less time between consultation and oocyte cryopreservation cycle compared to control patients. (179 vs. 317 days, p = 0.045). There was no difference in time from consultation to starting cycle for embryo cryopreservation for patients with HBOC compared to controls (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Patients with HBOC did not undergo expedited fertility treatment compared to control patients undergoing oocyte and embryo cryopreservation for non-infertility reasons. Patients diagnosed with BRCA1 had more oocytes retrieved compared to the control population which is possibly due to earlier age of presentation in the setting of recommended age of risk reducing surgery being age 35-40. When age matched, cycle outcomes did not differ between HBOC and control patients. Given the known cancer prevention benefit and recommendations for risk-reducing surgery, future studies should focus on guidelines for fertility preservation for patients with HBOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharonne Holtzman
- Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Lily McCarthy
- Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samantha L Estevez
- Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA; Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph A Lee
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Morgan F Baird
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dmitry Gounko
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alan B Copperman
- Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA; Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Magaton IM, Arecco L, Mariamidze E, Jankovic K, Stana M, Buzzatti G, Trevisan L, Scavone G, Ottonello S, Fregatti P, Massarotti C, von Wolff M, Lambertini M. Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in Young BRCA Carriers With Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2024; 18:11782234241261429. [PMID: 38882447 PMCID: PMC11179469 DOI: 10.1177/11782234241261429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Approximately 10% to 15% of breast cancer cases in young women are diagnosed in patients harbouring germline (g) pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BReast CAncer 1 (BRCA1) or BReast CAncer 2 (BRCA2) genes. Preclinical and clinical studies showed a potential negative effect of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) PVs on ovarian reserve and reproductive potential, even before starting anticancer therapies. The aim of this article is to summarize the current literature on the fertility potential of young gBRCA1/2 PVs carriers with breast cancer and the risk of gonadotoxicity associated with anticancer treatments. Moreover, we describe the available evidence on the efficacy of fertility preservation techniques in young gBRCA1/2 PVs carriers and the safety data on having a pregnancy after breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isotta Martha Magaton
- Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's Hospital, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elene Mariamidze
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Todua Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgien
| | - Kristina Jankovic
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinic Center Nis, Nis, Serbia
| | - Mihaela Stana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elysee Hospital, Alba Iulia, Romania
| | - Giulia Buzzatti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Unit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lucia Trevisan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Unit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Graziana Scavone
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Ottonello
- Departent of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- Department of Surgery, U.O.C. Clinica di Chirurgia Senologica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI Department), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Child Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michael von Wolff
- Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's Hospital, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lambertini M, Blondeaux E, Agostinetto E, Hamy AS, Kim HJ, Di Meglio A, Bernstein Molho R, Hilbers F, Pogoda K, Carrasco E, Punie K, Bajpai J, Ignatiadis M, Moore HCF, Phillips KA, Toss A, Rousset-Jablonski C, Peccatori FA, Renaud T, Ferrari A, Paluch-Shimon S, Fruscio R, Cui W, Wong SM, Vernieri C, Ruddy KJ, Dieci MV, Matikas A, Rozenblit M, Villarreal-Garza C, De Marchis L, Del Mastro L, Puglisi F, Del Pilar Estevez-Diz M, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Mrinakova B, Meister S, Livraghi L, Clatot F, Yerushalmi R, De Angelis C, Sánchez-Bayona R, Meattini I, Cichowska-Cwalińska N, Berlière M, Salama M, De Giorgi U, Sonnenblick A, Chiodi C, Lee YJ, Maria C, Azim HA, Boni L, Partridge AH. Pregnancy After Breast Cancer in Young BRCA Carriers: An International Hospital-Based Cohort Study. JAMA 2024; 331:49-59. [PMID: 38059899 PMCID: PMC10704340 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.25463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Importance Young women with breast cancer who have germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 face unique challenges regarding fertility. Previous studies demonstrating the feasibility and safety of pregnancy in breast cancer survivors included limited data regarding BRCA carriers. Objective To investigate cumulative incidence of pregnancy and disease-free survival in young women who are BRCA carriers. Design, Setting, and Participants International, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study conducted at 78 participating centers worldwide. The study included female participants diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at age 40 years or younger between January 2000 and December 2020 carrying germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2. Last delivery was October 7, 2022; last follow-up was February 20, 2023. Exposure Pregnancy after breast cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary end points were cumulative incidence of pregnancy after breast cancer and disease-free survival. Secondary end points were breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, pregnancy, and fetal and obstetric outcomes. Results Of 4732 BRCA carriers included, 659 had at least 1 pregnancy after breast cancer and 4073 did not. Median age at diagnosis in the overall cohort was 35 years (IQR, 31-38 years). Cumulative incidence of pregnancy at 10 years was 22% (95% CI, 21%-24%), with a median time from breast cancer diagnosis to conception of 3.5 years (IQR, 2.2-5.3 years). Among the 659 patients who had a pregnancy, 45 (6.9%) and 63 (9.7%) had an induced abortion or a miscarriage, respectively. Of the 517 patients (79.7%) with a completed pregnancy, 406 (91.0%) delivered at term (≥37 weeks) and 54 (10.4%) had twins. Among the 470 infants born with known information on pregnancy complications, 4 (0.9%) had documented congenital anomalies. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (IQR, 4.5-12.6 years). No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed between patients with or without a pregnancy after breast cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81-1.20). Patients who had a pregnancy had significantly better breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance In this global study, 1 in 5 young BRCA carriers conceived within 10 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Pregnancy following breast cancer in BRCA carriers was not associated with decreased disease-free survival. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03673306.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U. O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- U. O. Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Elisa Agostinetto
- Breast Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universite Paris Cité, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- Cancer Survivorship Program–Molecular Predicitors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Rinat Bernstein Molho
- Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center Affiliated to Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Florentine Hilbers
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Estela Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jyoti Bajpai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Breast Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Halle C. F. Moore
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Fedro A. Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alberta Ferrari
- Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Unit and General Surgery 3–Senology, Surgical Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Breast Oncology Unit, Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Robert Fruscio
- UO Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan–Bicocca, IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| | - Wanda Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephanie M. Wong
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, and McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claudio Vernieri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- IFOM ETS, AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Kathryn J. Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Oncologiche, e Gastroenterologiche, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
- Oncologia 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Alexios Matikas
- Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institute, and Breast Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mariya Rozenblit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion–TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Laura De Marchis
- Department of Radiological, Oncological, and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Division of Oncology, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Dermatology, Umberto 1 University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U. O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Avano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Kenny A. Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bela Mrinakova
- First Department of Oncology, Comenius University and St Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Sarah Meister
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Luca Livraghi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Prato, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Rinat Yerushalmi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Carmine De Angelis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences M. Serio, University of Florence, and Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Florence University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Natalia Cichowska-Cwalińska
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Centre, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Martine Berlière
- Department of Medical Oncology and Breast Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mahmoud Salama
- Oncofertility Consortium and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - Amir Sonnenblick
- Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Camila Chiodi
- Cancer Survivorship Program–Molecular Predicitors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Young-Jin Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Camille Maria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universite Paris Cité, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hatem A. Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion–TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
- Cairo Oncology Center, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Luca Boni
- U. O. Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ann H. Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barrett F, Shaw J, Besser AG, Grifo JA, Blakemore JK. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders: clinical experience with BRCA1 and BRCA2 from 2010-2021. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:2705-2713. [PMID: 37691027 PMCID: PMC10643755 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02925-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim was to describe the reproductive decisions and outcomes of BRCA-positive patients who used preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M). METHODS We performed a retrospective case series of all PGT-M cycles for BRCA variants between 2010-2021 at a large urban academic fertility center. All patients who underwent ≥ 1 cycle of IVF with PGT-M for BRCA1 or BRCA2 were included. The primary outcome was total number of BRCA-negative euploid embryos per patient. RESULTS Sixty four patients underwent PGT-M for BRCA variants. Forty-five percent (29/64) were BRCA1-positive females, 27% (17/64) were BRCA2-positive females, 16% (10/64) were BRCA1-positive males, 11% (7/64) were BRCA2-positive males, and one was a BRCA1 and BRCA2-positive male. There were 125 retrieval cycles with PGT-M, and all cycles included PGT for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Eighty-six percent (55/64) of patients obtained at least one BRCA- negative euploid embryo, with median of 1 (range 0-10) BRCA-negative euploid embryo resulted per cycle and median 3 (range 0-10) BRCA-negative euploid embryos accumulated per patient after a median of 2 (range 1-7) oocyte retrievals. Sixty-four percent (41/64) of patients attempted at least one frozen embryo transfer (FET) with a total of 68 FET cycles. Fifty-nine percent (40/68) of embryos transferred resulted in live births. Subgroup analysis revealed different reproductive pathways for BRCA1-positive females, BRCA2-positive females, and BRCA1/2-positive males (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION PGT-M is a viable option for BRCA-positive patients to avoid transmission while building their families. Most patients in our cohort achieved pregnancy with BRCA-negative euploid embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Barrett
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| | - Jacquelyn Shaw
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Andria G Besser
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - James A Grifo
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Jennifer K Blakemore
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Soldato D, Arecco L, Agostinetto E, Franzoi MA, Mariamidze E, Begijanashvili S, Brunetti N, Spinaci S, Solinas C, Vaz-Luis I, Di Meglio A, Lambertini M. The Future of Breast Cancer Research in the Survivorship Field. Oncol Ther 2023; 11:199-229. [PMID: 37005952 PMCID: PMC10260743 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-023-00225-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Prevalence of survivors of breast cancer has been steadily increasing in the last 20 years. Currently, more than 90% of women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer are expected to be alive at 5 years from diagnosis thanks to early detection and breakthrough innovations in multimodal treatment strategies. Alongside this advancement in clinical outcomes, survivors of breast cancer might experience several specific challenges and present with unique needs. Survivorship trajectories after diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be significantly impacted by long-lasting and severe treatment-related side effects, including physical problems, psychological distress, fertility issues in young women, and impaired social and work reintegration, which add up to patients' individual risk of cancer recurrence and second primary malignancies. Alongside cancer-specific sequelae, survivors still present with general health needs, including management of chronic preexisting or ensuing conditions. Survivorship care should implement high-quality, evidence-based strategies to promptly screen, identify, and address survivors' needs in a comprehensive way and minimize the impact of severe treatment sequelae, preexisting comorbidities, unhealthy lifestyles, and risk of recurrence on quality of life. This narrative review focuses on core areas of survivorship care and discuss the state of the art and future research perspectives in key domains including selected long-term side effects, surveillance for recurrences and second cancers, well-being promotion, and specific survivors' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Soldato
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - L Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - E Agostinetto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M A Franzoi
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - E Mariamidze
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Todua Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - S Begijanashvili
- Department of Clinical Oncology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - N Brunetti
- Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Villa Scassi Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - C Solinas
- Medical Oncology, AOU Cagliari, Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Italy
| | - I Vaz-Luis
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Di Meglio
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prokurotaite E, Condorelli M, Dechene J, Bouziotis J, Lambertini M, Demeestere I. Impact of Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants on Fertility Preservation in Young Women. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:930. [PMID: 37109459 PMCID: PMC10146760 DOI: 10.3390/life13040930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have suggested that breast cancer (BC) and germline BRCA pathogenic variants (gBRCA PVs) could have a deleterious impact on ovarian reserve. Nevertheless, data are limited and mixed. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of fertility preservation (FP) in terms of the number of collected mature oocytes after ovarian stimulation (OS) in young women carrying a gBRCA PV, associated or not with BC. METHODS We conducted a retrospective monocentric study at HUB-Hôpital Erasme in Brussels. All women aged between 18 and 41 years diagnosed with invasive non-metastatic BC and/or gBRCA PV carriers who underwent OS for FP or preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorder (PGT-M) between November 2012 and October 2021 were included. Three groups were compared: BC patients without a gBRCA PV, BC patients with a gBRCA PV, and healthy gBRCA PV carriers. Ovarian reserve was evaluated based on the efficacy of OS and AMH levels. RESULTS A total of 85 patients underwent 100 cycles. The mean age (32.2 ± 3.9 years; p = 0.61) and median AMH level (1.9 [0.2-13] μg/L; p = 0.22) were similar between groups. Correlations between the number of mature oocytes and AMH level (p < 0.001) and between AMH and age (p < 0.001) were observed. No differences in the number of retrieved mature oocytes were observed between groups (p = 0.41), or for other OS parameters. CONCLUSION Neither BC nor a gBRCA PV significantly affects ovarian reserve and FP efficacy in terms of the number of mature oocytes retrieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elze Prokurotaite
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, H.U.B—Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Margherita Condorelli
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, H.U.B—Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julie Dechene
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jason Bouziotis
- Department of Biomedical Research, H.U.B—Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, H.U.B—Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Razeti MG, Soldato D, Arecco L, Levaggi A, Puglisi S, Solinas C, Agostinetto E, Spinaci S, Lapuchesky L, Genova C, Massarotti C, Lambertini M. Approaches to Fertility Preservation for Young Women With Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:241-248. [PMID: 36710145 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
In patients with early breast cancer, the combination of different systemic treatment strategies, including chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, and more recently also immunotherapy has demonstrated to significantly improve their survival outcomes. However, this gain is often obtained at the cost of higher toxicity calling for the need of increased attention toward survivorship-related issues, including fertility preservation in young women. According to available guidelines, health care providers should offer oncofertility counseling to all patients with cancer diagnosed at reproductive age. Counselling should focus on the risk of gonadotoxicity of anticancer treatments and on the access to fertility preservation techniques. However, several surveys have demonstrated suboptimal implementation of these recommendations. This review aims at summarizing the available evidence on oncofertility to guide health care providers involved in the management of young women with breast cancer. Available and effective options for fertility preservation include oocyte/embryo cryopreservation or ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics should be carefully considered when offering these strategies. Ovarian function preservation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy should be discussed and offered to every premenopausal woman concerned about developing premature ovarian insufficiency and independently of her wish to preserve fertility. Current available data confirm that pregnancy occurring after proper treatment for breast cancer is safe, both in terms of long-term clinical outcomes and for the babies. Fertility preservation and pregnancy desire should be pivotal components of the multimodal management of breast cancer in young women, and require a multidisciplinary approach based on close collaborations between oncologists and fertility specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria G Razeti
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Davide Soldato
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessia Levaggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Medical Oncology, AOU Cagliari, Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Elisa Agostinetto
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Laura Lapuchesky
- Medical Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Ciudad Autónoma De Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Carlo Genova
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Physiopatology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal-Child Health (DiNOGMI Department), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Terzic M, Makhadiyeva D, Bila J, Andjic M, Dotlic J, Aimagambetova G, Sarria-Santamera A, Laganà AS, Chiantera V, Vukovic I, Kocijancic Belovic D, Aksam S, Bapayeva G, Terzic S. Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes after Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Cervical Cancer: Current Approach and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072614. [PMID: 37048696 PMCID: PMC10095321 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in women of reproductive age. The established fertility-sparing approaches for the management of early-stage cervical cancer for women who plan pregnancy are associated with a decline in fecundity and an increased risk of pregnancy complications. This article aims to offer an overview of fertility-sparing approaches and the management of potential subfertility and pregnancy complications after these treatments. An extensive search for the available data about infertility and cervical cancer, fertility-sparing techniques in patients with cervical cancer, fertility treatment, obstetrical complications, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cancer patients was completed. Fertility-preserving procedures such as loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), cold-knife conization, and trachelectomy in women diagnosed with cervical cancer can be considered as safe and effective treatments that preserve reproductive potential. Current fertility-preserving procedures, based on the balance of the oncological characteristics of patients as well as their desire for reproduction, allow one to obtain acceptable reproductive and obstetric outcomes in women treated for cervical cancer. Nevertheless, careful monitoring of pregnancies obtained after fertility-preserving procedures is recommended, since this cohort of patients should be considered at higher risk compared with a healthy population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Terzic
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
- Clinical Academic Department of Women’s Health, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Corporate Fund “University Medical Center”, Turan Ave. 32, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Dinara Makhadiyeva
- School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Jovan Bila
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Mladen Andjic
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Jelena Dotlic
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Gulzhanat Aimagambetova
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
- Correspondence:
| | - Antonio Sarria-Santamera
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Ivana Vukovic
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Dusica Kocijancic Belovic
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Slavica Aksam
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Gauri Bapayeva
- Clinical Academic Department of Women’s Health, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Corporate Fund “University Medical Center”, Turan Ave. 32, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Sanja Terzic
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vinciguerra M, Cascardi E, Lamanna B, Marrone M, Pititto F, Macorano E, Sciorio R, Baldini GM, Malvasi A, Ballini A, Cazzato G, Vimercati A, Kumaran S, Cicinelli E, Scacco S, Dellino M. A Multi-Institutional Informed Consent Proposal as a Prevention Tool for Combined Oral Contraceptive Intake and Thrombotic Risk. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040584. [PMID: 37108970 PMCID: PMC10144716 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Combined oral contraceptives (COC), are among the most widely used contraceptive methods in the world today. Despite the different changes in terms of estrogen/progestogen combinations and dosages, the thromboembolic risk for a woman who takes combined oral contraceptives persists to date. Methods: The review of relevant literature and international guidelines on prescription of combined oral contraceptives made it possible to create a proposal for informed consent to be used for prescribing. Results: The several sections of our consent proposal were designed according to a rationale in order to cover all the aspects presented by worldwide guidelines: how to take, adverse effects, advertisements, extra-contraceptive benefits and effects, a checklist for condition at risk of thromboembolism, the signature of the woman. Conclusions: An informed consent to standardize combined oral contraceptives prescription can improve women’s eligibility, mitigate thromboembolic risk, and assure legal protection to healthcare providers. In this systematic review in particular, we refer to the Italian medical–legal scenario, to which our group of researchers belongs. However, the model proposed was designed in the respect of main healthcare organization guidelines, and it could be easily used by any center in the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Vinciguerra
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70132 Bari, Italy; (M.V.); (M.D.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, “Santa Caterina Novella Hospital”, 73013 Galatina, Italy
| | - Eliano Cascardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy;
- Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, Str. Provinciale 142 km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Bruno Lamanna
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70132 Bari, Italy; (M.V.); (M.D.)
- Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Maricla Marrone
- Section of Legal Medicine, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Fortunato Pititto
- Section of Legal Medicine, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Enrica Macorano
- Section of Legal Medicine, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Romualdo Sciorio
- EFREC (Edinburgh Assisted Conception Programme), “Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh”, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
| | | | - Antonio Malvasi
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70132 Bari, Italy; (M.V.); (M.D.)
| | - Andrea Ballini
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence: (A.B.); (S.S.)
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Jonic Area, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Vimercati
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Jonic Area, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Senthil Kumaran
- Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri 522503, India
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70132 Bari, Italy; (M.V.); (M.D.)
| | - Salvatore Scacco
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
- Correspondence: (A.B.); (S.S.)
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70132 Bari, Italy; (M.V.); (M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang R, Zhang J, Cui X, Wang S, Chen T, Niu Y, Du X, Kong J, Wang L, Jiang Y. Multimolecular characteristics and role of BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1 (BRIP1) in human tumors: a pan-cancer analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:91. [PMID: 36907870 PMCID: PMC10010046 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02877-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 03/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aberrant expression of BRIP1 was associated with several cancers; however, the panoramic picture of BRIP1 in human tumors remains unclear. This study aims to explore the pan-cancerous picture of the expression of BRIP1 across 33 human cancers. METHODS Based on the data from TCGA and GTEx, a series of bioinformatic analyses were applied to systematically explore the genetic landscape and biologic function of BRIP1 in 33 human tumors. RESULTS We observed prognosis-related differential BRIP1 expressions between various carcinomas and the corresponding normal tissues. "Basal transcription factors," "homologous recombination," "nucleotide excision repair," and DNA metabolism pathways may play a role in the functional mechanisms of BRIP1. Patients with uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma presented with the highest alteration frequency of BRIP1 (nearly 10%). Single-nucleotide and copy number variations of BRIP1 were noticed in multiple cancers, and the expression of BRIP1 is significantly regulated by copy number variation in breast invasive carcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma. BRIP1 expression is negatively correlated with the DNA methylation levels in many tumors and is associated with the activation of apoptosis, cell cycle, DNA damage response, and inhibition of hormone ER and RNS/MARK signaling pathways. Moreover, a positive correlation was observed between BRIP1 expression and the immune infiltration levels of cancer-associated fibroblasts and CD8+ T cells in lung adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION Our pan-cancer analysis of BRIP1 provides a valuable resource for understanding the multimolecular characteristics and biological function of BRIP1 across human cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruohuang Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China
| | - Jisheng Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China
| | - Xin Cui
- Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China
| | - Shun Wang
- The Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200000, China
| | - Ting Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China
| | - Yanfang Niu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Yuncheng Central Hospital, Yuncheng, Shanxi, 044000, China
| | - Xiaoyun Du
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China
| | - Jingwen Kong
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China.
| | - Yan Jiang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Loizzi V, Dellino M, Cerbone M, Arezzo F, Chiariello G, Lepera A, Cazzato G, Cascardi E, Damiani GR, Cicinelli E, Cormio G. Hormone replacement therapy in BRCA mutation carriers: how shall we do no harm? Hormones (Athens) 2023; 22:19-23. [PMID: 36637775 DOI: 10.1007/s42000-022-00427-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Women with a BRCA mutation have an increased risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the only effective strategy to reduce this risk. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended between the ages of 35 and 40 for women carriers of BRCA1 and between the ages of 40 and 45 for women carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Most women undergo this procedure prior to their natural menopause subsequently developing an anticipated lack of hormones. This condition affects the quality of life and longevity, while it is more pronounced in women carrying a BRCA1 mutation compared to BRCA2 because they are likely to have surgery earlier. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is the only strategy able to significantly compensate for the loss of ovarian hormone production and counteract menopausal symptoms. There is strong evidence that short-term HRT use does not increase the risk of breast cancer among women with a BRCA1 mutation. Few data are available on BRCA2 mutation carriers. Therefore, BRCA mutation carriers require careful counseling about the outcomes of their RRSO, including menopausal symptoms and/or the fear associated with HRT use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Loizzi
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy
- Oncology Unit IRCSS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Paolo" Hospital, ASL Bari, Bari, Italy.
| | - Marco Cerbone
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Arezzo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Giulia Chiariello
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Achiropita Lepera
- Section of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Interdisciplinar Medicine(DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Section of Pathology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Eliano Cascardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy
- Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, 10060, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Raffaello Damiani
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy
- Oncology Unit IRCSS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baltacı E, Kazancı F, Şahin Fİ. BRCA, infertility, and fertility preservation: a review for counseling. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:465-472. [PMID: 36695945 PMCID: PMC10033813 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02725-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BRCA mutations as a triggering factor in breast cancer have been reported to result in fertility problems and oocyte aging in young patients with cancer diagnosis. These patients are concerned about fertility problems and family planning before undergoing treatment modalities that may result in infertility. In this review, we conducted analysis of the literature on the association between BRCA mutations and infertility, possible fertility preservation options, and their safety and tried to gather results from different disciplines and points of view on the matter. Our aim is to provide a general summary of recent studies to provide further insight on the matter for counseling BRCA mutation carriers on fertility preservation methods and their implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ege Baltacı
- Department of Medical Genetics, Başkent University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ferah Kazancı
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Nezip Fazıl City Hospital, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
| | - Feride İffet Şahin
- Department of Medical Genetics, Başkent University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schubert M, Mettler L, Deenadayal Tolani A, Alkatout I. Fertility Preservation in Endometrial Cancer-Treatment and Molecular Aspects. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:221. [PMID: 36837423 PMCID: PMC9962641 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies worldwide; incidences are rising, with 417,367 new cases registered in 2020. Of these, the proportion of women that are of reproductive age is around 4-14% and the number is increasing. Thus, in addition to oncological therapy and safety, the preservation of fertility plays a central role in therapeutic strategies. Molecular genetic patient data provide a robust supplementary benefit that improves primary risk assessment and can help design personalized treatment options to curtail over- and undertreatment and contribute to fertility preserving strategies. The aim of our review is to provide an overview of the latest significant recommendations in the diagnosis and therapy of endometrial cancer during reproductive age. In this paper the most recent groundbreaking molecular discoveries in endometrial cancer are highlighted and discussed as an opportunity to enhance the prognostic and therapy options in this special patient collective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Schubert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Postcode Kiel, Germany
| | - Liselotte Mettler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Postcode Kiel, Germany
| | - Aarti Deenadayal Tolani
- Mamata Fertility Hospital, Infertility Institute and Research Centre, Secunderabad 500026, Telangana, India
| | - Ibrahim Alkatout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Postcode Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The Role of Hormonal Replacement Therapy in BRCA Mutated Patients: Lights and Shadows. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24010764. [PMID: 36614207 PMCID: PMC9821191 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
All cancers develop as a result of mutations in genes. DNA damage induces genomic instability and subsequently increases susceptibility to tumorigenesis. Women who carry mutations of BRCA 1 and BRCA2 genes have an augmented risk of breast and ovarian cancer and a markedly augmented probability of dying because of cancer compared to the general population. As a result, international guidelines recommend that all BRCA1\2 mutation carriers be offered risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at an early age to reduce the risk of cancer and decrease the mortality rate of this high-risk population. NCCN guidelines recommend risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in pre-menopausal women, between 35-40 years in BRCA1 mutation carriers and between 40-45 years in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Unfortunately, the well-documented reduction of cancer risk is counterbalanced by early sterility and premature ovarian failure with an early onset of secondary menopausal syndromes such as neuromotor, cardiovascular, cognitive and urogenital deficiency. Hormonal replacement therapy significantly compensates for hormonal deprivation and counteracts menopausal syndrome morbidity and mortality; however, some data suggest a possible correlation between hormonal medications and cancer risk, especially in BRCA1\2 carriers who undergo long-term regimens. Conversely, short-term treatment before the age of natural menopause does not appear to increase the cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers without a personal history of breast cancer after prophylactic surgery. Few data are available on BRCA2 mutation carriers and more well-designed studies are needed. In conclusion, clinicians should propose short-term hormone replacement therapy to BRCA 1 carriers to counteract hormonal deprivation; personalized counselling should be offered to BRCA2 mutation carriers for a balance between the risks and benefits of the treatment.
Collapse
|
18
|
Dellino M, Cascardi E, Laganà AS, Di Vagno G, Malvasi A, Zaccaro R, Maggipinto K, Cazzato G, Scacco S, Tinelli R, De Luca A, Vinciguerra M, Loizzi V, Daniele A, Cicinelli E, Carriero C, Genco CA, Cormio G, Pinto V. Lactobacillus crispatus M247 oral administration: Is it really an effective strategy in the management of papillomavirus-infected women? Infect Agent Cancer 2022; 17:53. [PMID: 36271433 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00465-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have shown the importance of the microbiota in women's health. Indeed, the persistence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-related lesions in patients with dysbiosis can be the antechamber to cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether long term administration of oral Lactobacillus crispatus can restore eubiosis in women with HPV infections and hence achieve viral clearance. METHODS In total, 160 women affected by HPV infections were enrolled at the Department of Gynecological Obstetrics of "San Paolo" Hospital, Italy between February 2021 and February 2022. The women were randomly assigned to two groups, one in treatment with oral Lactobacillus crispatus M247 (group 1, n = 80) versus the control group, that hence only in follow-up (Group 2, n = 80). RESULTS After a median follow-up of 12 months (range 10-30 months), the likelihood of resolving HPV-related cytological anomalies was higher in patients in treatment with the long term oral probiotic (group 1) versus the group that perfom only follow-up (group 2) (60.5% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.05). Total HPV clearance was shown in 9.3% of patients undergoing only follow-up compared to 15.3% of patients in the group taking long term oral Lactobacillus crispatus M247 (p = 0.34). However, the percentage of HPV-negative patients, assessed with the HPV-DNA test, documented at the end of the study period was not significantly different from the control group. CONCLUSIONS Despite the limitations of our analysis, we found a higher percentage of clearance of PAP-smear abnormalities in patients who took long term oral Lactobacillus crispatus M247 than in the control group. Larger studies are warranted, but we believe that future research should be aimed in this direction. Trial registration This study is retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Dellino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100, Bari, Italy. .,Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Paolo" Hospital, ASL Bari, Bari, Italy.
| | - Eliano Cascardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Vagno
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Paolo" Hospital, ASL Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Malvasi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100, Bari, Italy
| | - Rosanna Zaccaro
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Paolo" Hospital, ASL Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Katia Maggipinto
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Paolo" Hospital, ASL Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Pathology Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Scacco
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaele Tinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Valle d'Itria" Hospital, Martina Franca, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Luca
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100, Bari, Italy
| | - Marina Vinciguerra
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Paolo" Hospital, ASL Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vera Loizzi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Daniele
- Institutional BioBank, Experimental Oncology and Biobank Management Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100, Bari, Italy
| | - Carmine Carriero
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Gennaro Cormio
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pinto
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dellino M, Lamanna B, Vinciguerra M, Tafuri S, Stefanizzi P, Malvasi A, Di Vagno G, Cormio G, Loizzi V, Cazzato G, Tinelli R, Cicinelli E, Pinto V, Daniele A, Maiorano E, Resta L, De Vito D, Scacco S, Cascardi E. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Adverse Effects in Gynecology and Obstetrics: The First Italian Retrospective Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph192013167. [PMID: 36293746 PMCID: PMC9603573 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
The most common effects reported by the Italian Medicine Agency following administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine are myalgia, soreness to the arm of inoculation, fever, and asthenia. To date, there are no specific and official reports registered by the Italian Medicine Agency on possible alterations of the menstrual cycle, or of the female reproductive system, following the vaccine. Actually, clinical experience showed a spread of transient adverse drug reactions of the menstrual cycle, following the administration of all COVID-19 vaccine types, both mRNA and Adenovirus vectored ones. In this work, we conducted the first retrospective study on Italian patients vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 in the period between April 2021 and April 2022, to report the onset of menstrual changes after the vaccine in order to understand: etiology, duration of possible adverse effects, and the extent of the phenomenon. We recruited 100 women aged 18-45, vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2, who were asked to complete a questionnaire consisting of 12 multiple choice questions about the effects of the vaccine on the reproductive system. Thirty-seven of them received three doses of the vaccine, while the remaining 63 received two doses. Symptoms such as delayed menstruation and abnormal uterine bleeding (metrorrhagia, menometrorrhagia, and menorrhagia) were generally reported within the first three weeks of vaccination, especially after the second dose, with a percentage of 23% and 77%, respectively. These preliminary data suggest that this problem may be broader and deserving of further investigation in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Dellino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “San Paolo” Hospital, ASL Bari, 70132 Bari, Italy
| | - Bruno Lamanna
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
- Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Marina Vinciguerra
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Stefanizzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Malvasi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Vagno
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “San Paolo” Hospital, ASL Bari, 70132 Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
| | - Vera Loizzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Pathology Section, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaele Tinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Valle d’Itria” Hospital, 74015 Martina Franca, Italy
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pinto
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Section, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Daniele
- Experimental Oncology, Center for Study of Heredo-Familial Tumors, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Eugenio Maiorano
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Pathology Section, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Leonardo Resta
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Pathology Section, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Danila De Vito
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Scacco
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
- Correspondence: (S.S.); (E.C.)
| | - Eliano Cascardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
- Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, Str. Provinciale 142 km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
- Correspondence: (S.S.); (E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dellino M, Crupano FM, He X, Malvasi A, Vimercati A. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section with hysterotomy above the lower uterine segment. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2022; 93:e2022269. [PMID: 36129411 PMCID: PMC10510962 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v93is1.12872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Spontaneous uterine rupture is a severe pregnancy complication. Several risk factors have been described, especially for women with a previous caesarean section. Method We reported two cases of uterine rupture (UR) occurring outside of labour in patients with a history of caesarean section (CS) due to placenta previa. Results: The current study evaluates how a higher hysterotomy, combined with some risk factors, can increase the prevalence of UR in the subsequent pregnancy. Conclusion This study supports that a careful evaluation of risk factors can identify patients who need a specific follow up to early diagnose and treat UR and thus improve the maternal-fetal outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Dellino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dellino M, Cascardi E, Leoni C, Fortunato F, Fusco A, Tinelli R, Cazzato G, Scacco S, Gnoni A, Scilimati A, Loizzi V, Malvasi A, Sapino A, Pinto V, Cicinelli E, Di Vagno G, Cormio G, Chiantera V, Laganà AS. Effects of Oral Supplementation with Myo-Inositol and D-Chiro-Inositol on Ovarian Functions in Female Long-Term Survivors of Lymphoma: Results from a Prospective Case–Control Analysis. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091536. [PMID: 36143320 PMCID: PMC9505907 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The progressive improvement of lymphoma treatment has led to an important prolongation of patient survival and life expectancy. The principal international scientific societies of oncology now therefore recommend that long-term survivors of lymphoma join fertility programs. Specifically, fertile-age patients should be assisted by a multidisciplinary team, including specialists dedicated to fertility preservation in oncology, in order to support the completion of their reproductive project. In the general population, the use of Myo-Inositol and D-Chiro-Inositol (MI/DCI) has been demonstrated to be an effective choice to treat ovarian dysfunctions, with a consequent improvement in reproductive outcomes, so it may represent an adjuvant strategy for this purpose. We therefore conducted a pilot prospective case–control study to evaluate the potentialities of this nutritional supplement, with the aim of optimizing reproductive function in female long-term survivors of lymphoma. One group underwent oral supplementation with MI 1200 mg and DCI 135 mg per day for 12 months, compared with controls who underwent no treatment in the same period. After 12 months, FSH, LH, and progesterone levels, as well as oligomenorrhea and antral follicle count (AFC), were significantly improved in the MI/DCI group. In addition, a significantly higher mean value in FSH and LH and a significantly lower mean AFC value in the right ovary were observed in controls compared to the MI/DCI group. Despite the need for further investigation, MI/DCI could be considered a potential adjuvant strategy to restore ovarian function in female long-term survivors of lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Dellino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “San Paolo” Hospital, 70132 Bari, Italy
| | - Eliano Cascardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
- Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
- Correspondence: (E.C.); (S.S.)
| | - Claudia Leoni
- Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 70126 Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Fortunato
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Annarita Fusco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical School of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaele Tinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Valle d’Itria” Hospital, 74015 Martina Franca, Italy
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Scacco
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
- Correspondence: (E.C.); (S.S.)
| | - Antonio Gnoni
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Scilimati
- Department of Pharmacy—Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Vera Loizzi
- Interdisciplinar Department of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Malvasi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Sapino
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
- Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pinto
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Vagno
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “San Paolo” Hospital, 70132 Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Department of interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico—Di Cristina—Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico—Di Cristina—Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dellino M, Cascardi E, Tomasone V, Zaccaro R, Maggipinto K, Giacomino ME, De Nicolò M, De Summa S, Cazzato G, Scacco S, Malvasi A, Pinto V, Cicinelli E, Carriero C, Di Vagno G, Cormio G, Genco CA. Communications Is Time for Care: An Italian Monocentric Survey on Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Risk Information as Part of Cervical Cancer Screening. J Pers Med 2022; 12:1387. [PMID: 36143172 PMCID: PMC9505682 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection could be considered a social disease, both for its high incidence, especially in younger subjects, and for the risk of neoplastic evolution linked to viral infection. Therefore, the National Health System, in collaboration with the state, must help women to understand the oncological risk of HPV and suitable methods of prevention. We conducted an Italian monocentric survey on HPV risk information as part of cervical cancer screening. An anonymous questionnaire was administered to 200 women with high-risk positive HPV and low-grade cervical lesions during second-level cervical cancer screening at the Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit of the "San Paolo" Hospital. From this survey, the need to improve communication for patients has emerged, as currently it is not exhaustive. In response to this need, organizational changes have been implemented to centralize the moment of counseling in the second levels of screening and to improve the training of health workers in level I as well as family doctors. In addition, psychological support was also proposed to patients who requested it, as was the dissemination of material such as that produced by GISCI (Italian Cervico-Carcinoma Screening Group) and updated in May 2018, which provides 100 answers to questions on HPV in order to achieve effective and comprehensive communication. This investigation requires further development, and the expansion of this investigation to the multicenter level is already underway. Therefore, this survey will represent a cornerstone for further discussion on the topic considering the necessity of appropriate communication in the oncological context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Dellino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Paolo" Hospital, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Eliano Cascardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
- Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, Str. Provinciale 142 km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Valentina Tomasone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Rosanna Zaccaro
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Paolo" Hospital, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Katia Maggipinto
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Paolo" Hospital, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Elena Giacomino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Miriana De Nicolò
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Simona De Summa
- Bioinformatician-Molecular Diagnostics and Pharmacogenetics Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Scacco
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Malvasi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pinto
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Carmine Carriero
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Vagno
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Paolo" Hospital, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Association between Cervical Microbiota and HPV: Could This Be the Key to Complete Cervical Cancer Eradication? BIOLOGY 2022; 11:biology11081114. [PMID: 35892970 PMCID: PMC9351688 DOI: 10.3390/biology11081114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary The microbiota can modulate immune responses and modify the physiology of the human organism, thereby increasing infective risks and a neoplastic predisposition. In this review, we focus on the composition of the cervical microbiota, to identify the risk of developing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and better understand the interaction between cervico-vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus as a means of promoting the identification of new therapeutic strategies. In fact, no therapy for HPV is yet available. A better understanding of the cervical micro-environment could be a key element allowing complete viral clearance to be achieved in largely affected populations. Abstract The heterogeneity of the cervico-vaginal microbiota can be appreciated in various conditions, both pathological and non-pathological, and can vary according to biological and environmental factors. Attempts are still in course to define the interaction and role of the various factors that constitute this community of commensals in immune protection, inflammatory processes, and the onset of precancerous lesions of the cervical epithelium. Despite the many studies on the relationship between microbiota, immunity, and HPV-related cervical tumors, further aspects still need to be probed. In this review article, we will examine the principal characteristics of microorganisms commonly found in cervico-vaginal specimens (i) the factors that notoriously condition the diversity and composition of microbiota, (ii) the role that some families of organisms may play in the onset of HPV-dysplastic lesions and in neoplastic progression, and (iii) possible diagnostic-therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
|
24
|
Massarotti C, Buonomo B, Dellino M, Campanella M, De Stefano C, Ferrari A, Anserini P, Lambertini M, Peccatori FA. Contraception and Hormone Replacement Therapy in Healthy Carriers of Germline BRCA1/2 Genes Pathogenic Variants: Results from an Italian Survey. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143457. [PMID: 35884518 PMCID: PMC9315728 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Several myths and misconceptions exist about hormones in women with familial predisposition to cancer, and there are few real-life data on their prescription and uptake. To better understand how they are prescribed and accepted in healthy carriers of a BRCA1/2 pathogenetic variant, an online survey was uploaded on Google Forms and shared through social media closed groups of patients' associations, aBRCAcadabra and ACTO Campania. A total of 241 questionnaires were collected. Sexual quality of life was considered of the utmost importance by most of the respondents (mean score of 7 ± 2.8/10), but they felt the counseling they received by healthcare professionals on the topic was insufficient (4.9 ± 3.2/10). Only 57 women out of 233 (24.5%) had used hormonal contraception after being diagnosed as carriers of a BRCA pathogenetic variant, and 42 out of 148 (28.4%) underwent menopause hormonal therapy. The majority of women (53.6% for contraception and 61.5% for menopause) reported being dissatisfied with the counseling received, and 58.2% were not aware of the protective effect of hormonal contraception on the risk of ovarian cancer. An educational effort is desirable to guarantee healthy BRCA carriers reliable contraception and evidence-based menopause counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Massarotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-010-555-5847
| | - Barbara Buonomo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (B.B.); (F.A.P.)
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “San Paolo” Hospital, ASL Bari, 70123 Bari, Italy;
| | - Maria Campanella
- aBRCAdabra, National Patient Advocacy Association for Carriers of BRCA Genes Mutation, 20019 Milan, Italy;
| | - Cristofaro De Stefano
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, “San Giuseppe Moscati” Hospital, 83100 Avellino, Italy;
| | - Alberta Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery 3—Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Paola Anserini
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy;
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy;
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Fedro A. Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (B.B.); (F.A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lambertini M, Marrocco C, Spinaci S, Demeestere I, Anderson RA. Risk of gonadotoxicity with immunotherapy and targeted agents remains an unsolved but crucial issue. Eur J Clin Invest 2022; 52:e13779. [PMID: 35342940 DOI: 10.1111/eci.13779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Camilla Marrocco
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genova, Italy
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Fertility clinic, CUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Edaily S, Abdel-Razeq H. Management Strategies of Breast Cancer Patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Germline Variants. Onco Targets Ther 2022; 15:815-826. [PMID: 35923470 PMCID: PMC9343017 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s369844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Most of breast cancer cases are sporadic; however, 15–20% are associated with family history, and some are inherited. Among those, deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor genes are the most commonly encountered pathogenic germline variants (PGVs). Given the availability and affordability of multi-gene panel sequencing technologies, testing for PGVs is commonly practiced. With our enhanced understanding of cancer genetics and specific molecular alterations, the better acceptance of risk-directed screening and prevention, and the recent introduction of novel targeted therapies, management of BRCA-positive breast cancers is taking a new direction, focusing more on risk-reducing interventions, including mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, and incorporating special treatment regimens, including platinum-based chemotherapy, and the recently-introduced PARP (poly (ADP)-ribose polymerase) inhibitors. Given the recent advances in reproductive technology and molecular medicine, younger women with PGVs may have the option of embryo selection through preimplantation genetic testing and diagnosis, thus preventing the potential transmission of the implicated genes to the next generations. In this review, we cover the clinical implications of identifying a pathogenic germline mutation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer patients, and their relatives, across the continuum of care – from cancer prevention and early detection, through active treatment and up to survivorship issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Edaily
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
- Correspondence: Hikmat Abdel-Razeq, Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan, Tel +962-6 5300460, Ext: 1000, Email
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Spontaneous Uterine Rupture and Adenomyosis, a Rare but Possible Correlation: Case Report and Literature Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12071574. [PMID: 35885480 PMCID: PMC9317678 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Uterine rupture during pregnancy is a serious obstetric complication with a high incidence of maternal morbidity and mortality. (2) Methods: The present case is a rare event of a uterine rupture occurring in an unscarred uterus in a nonlaboring primigravida woman in the second trimester. The only risk factor in this case was adenomyosis found in the preconceptional phase. (3) Results: The diagnosis of adenomyosis can often be difficult, so patients should be evaluated by a specialized gynecologist. After careful amnestic collection, a gynecological examination and II level ultrasound should be performed in accordance with the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment classification. (4) Conclusions: This evaluation allows us to identify classes of patients at high risk of uterine rupture who, therefore, must be properly informed of the risks both during preconceptional counseling and during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Silvestris E, Paradiso AV, Minoia C, Daniele A, Cormio G, Tinelli R, D’Oronzo S, Cafforio P, Loizzi V, Dellino M. Fertility preservation techniques in cervical carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29163. [PMID: 35512072 PMCID: PMC9276378 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The usefulness of this review is to highlight how a fertility preservation (FP) approach is currently feasible for patients diagnosed with uterine cervical cancer. To this regard, a fertility sparing surgery has just overcome its traditional limits, gained acceptance within the major gynecologic oncology societies thanks to the ability to identify the "ideal" candidates to this conservative treatment. On the other hand, the use of other FPs for oocyte and ovarian cortex cryopreservation is still extremely debated. In fact, the existing risk of tumor spreading during oocyte retrieval necessary for oocyte cryostorage for patients' candidates for neo-adjuvant therapy, as well as the potential hazard of cancer cell dissemination after ovarian tissue replacement in cases of non-squamous type cervical carcinomas should not be underestimated. Therefore, in consideration of the encountered limitations and the need to ensure adequate reproductive health for young uterine cervical cancer survivors, translational research regarding the FP has progressively collected innovative insights into the employment of stemness technology. In this context, the property of ovarian stem cells obtained from the ovarian cortex to generate functional oocytes in women could represent a promising therapeutic alternative to the current procedures for a novel and safer FP approach in cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Silvestris
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” Bari, Italy
| | - Angelo Virgilio Paradiso
- Institutional BioBank, Experimental Oncology and Biobank Management Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II,” Bari, Italy
| | - Carla Minoia
- Unit of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Laboratory of Hematological Diagnostics and Cell Characterization, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Daniele
- Experimental Oncology, Center for Study of Heredo-Familial Tumors, IRCCS Istituto Tumori ”Giovanni Paolo II“ Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaele Tinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ”Valle d’Itria" Hospital, Martina Franca, Italy
| | - Stella D’Oronzo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Section of Internal Medicine and Clinical Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Paola Cafforio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Section of Internal Medicine and Clinical Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Vera Loizzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “San Paolo” Hospital, Bari, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Maksimenko J, Irmejs A, Gardovskis J. Pregnancy after breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:3. [PMID: 35062994 PMCID: PMC8781048 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00209-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Often young women affected with BRCA1/2 positive breast cancer have not finished or even not started their childbearing before the onset of the disease. The aim of our mini-review is to summarize state of art knowledge on pregnancy after breast cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers. Methods A broad review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) for relevant articles published. Main body of the abstract This review summarizes the impact of different cytotoxic agents on a fertility, fertility preservation, maternal and fetal prognosis after pregnancy in breast cancer survivors with BRCA1/2. Conclusion According to the existing literature evidence pregnancy after therapy for breast cancer in BRCA carriers is safe for the mother and offspring, but patients’ needs, oncofertility counseling and fertility-sparing strategy should be carefully planned before starting the cytotoxic treatment.
Collapse
|
30
|
Somigliana E, Costantini MP, Filippi F, Terenziani M, Riccaboni A, Nicotra V, Rago R, Paffoni A, Mencaglia L, Magnolfi S, Zuccarello D, Rienzi L, Spinella F, Capalbo A, Scaravelli G, Testa S. Fertility counseling in women with hereditary cancer syndromes. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 171:103604. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
31
|
Sumida S, Iida T, Yoshikawa M, Nagaoka K. Association of Mammary Gland Disease With Metabolic Syndrome Factors in Japanese Women—Case-Control Study Based on Health Screening Results. BREAST CANCER: BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH 2022; 16:11782234221127652. [PMID: 36353655 PMCID: PMC9638686 DOI: 10.1177/11782234221127652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The association of obesity with breast cancer is clear. Although body mass
index (BMI) is used as an indicator of obesity, its accuracy remains
questionable. Although, there factors for diagnosing metabolic syndrome are
caused by obesity, the association with breast cancer has not been
clarified. Methods: Women who underwent breast cancer screening with mammography and measurements
of metabolic syndrome factors, including waist circumference, blood glucose,
triglycerides, HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels, and
systolic and diastolic pressure, twice within a 2-year period were enrolled
(n = 314), with a final sample size of 256. To determine the presence of
mammary gland disease, 2 expert physicians interpreted radiogram findings,
with category 3 or higher shown by mammography considered to indicate an
abnormality. Results and Conclusions: Waist circumference at the initial measurement was marginally significant as
a risk factor for onset of mammary gland disease (odds ratio [OR] = 1.036,
P = .045) and thus was concluded to be a risk factor
for disease onset. Although not significant, a 2-year increase in systolic
and diastolic blood pressure has been presumed to be risk factors (systolic:
OR = 1.020, P = .085, diastolic: OR = 1.040,
P = .065), while high levels of HDL cholesterol have
been presumed to protect against the disease (OR = 0.982,
P = .064). Based on these results, waist circumference and
blood pressure are speculated to be related to development of mammary gland
disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakika Sumida
- Department of Radiology, Yoshida General Hospital, Akitakata, Japan
| | - Tadayuki Iida
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Mihara, Japan
| | - Masao Yoshikawa
- Preventive Medicine Promotion Research Center, Nisshin, Japan
| | - Kaoru Nagaoka
- Preventive Medicine Promotion Research Center, Nisshin, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Condorelli M, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Ferrari A, Grinshpun A, Hamy AS, de Azambuja E, Carrasco E, Peccatori FA, Di Meglio A, Paluch-Shimon S, Poorvu PD, Venturelli M, Rousset-Jablonski C, Senechal C, Livraghi L, Ponzone R, De Marchis L, Pogoda K, Sonnenblick A, Villarreal-Garza C, Córdoba O, Teixeira L, Clatot F, Punie K, Graffeo R, Dieci MV, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Duhoux FP, Puglisi F, Ferreira AR, Blondeaux E, Peretz-Yablonski T, Caron O, Saule C, Ameye L, Balmaña J, Partridge AH, Azim HA, Demeestere I, Lambertini M. Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100300. [PMID: 34775302 PMCID: PMC8593447 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge is growing on the safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in cancer survivors. No data exist, however, for the specific population of breast cancer patients harboring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤40 years with stage I-III breast cancer, between January 2000 and December 2012, harboring known germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Patients included in this analysis had a post-treatment pregnancy either achieved through use of ART (ART group) or naturally (non-ART group). ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy. RESULTS Among the 1424 patients registered in the study, 168 were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis, of whom 22 were in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Survivors in the ART group conceived at an older age compared with those in the non-ART group (median age: 39.7 versus 35.4 years, respectively). Women in the ART group experienced more delivery complications compared with those in the non-ART group (22.1% versus 4.1%, respectively). No other apparent differences in obstetrical outcomes were observed between cohorts. The median follow-up from pregnancy was 3.4 years (range: 0.8-8.6 years) in the ART group and 5.0 years (range: 0.8-17.6 years) in the non-ART group. Two patients (9.1%) in the ART group experienced a disease-free survival event (specifically, a locoregional recurrence) compared with 40 patients (27.4%) in the non-ART group. In the ART group, no patients deceased compared with 10 patients (6.9%) in the non-ART group. CONCLUSION This study provides encouraging safety data on the use of ART in breast cancer survivors harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, when natural conception fails or when they opt for ART in order to carry out preimplantation genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Condorelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium; Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - M Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - A Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Grinshpun
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - A S Hamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - E de Azambuja
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Di Meglio
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - P D Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - M Venturelli
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - C Rousset-Jablonski
- Department of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard and INSERM U1290 RESHAPE, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - C Senechal
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - L Livraghi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - R Ponzone
- Gynecological Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - L De Marchis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - K Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A Sonnenblick
- Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - C Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| | - O Córdoba
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain
| | - L Teixeira
- Breast Disease Unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - F Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - K Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Graffeo
- Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland (CSSI), Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - M V Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - J A Pérez-Fidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA University Hospital of Valencia, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - F P Duhoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Clinic, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - A R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - E Blondeaux
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - T Peretz-Yablonski
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - O Caron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - C Saule
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Ameye
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - J Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - H A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| | - I Demeestere
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium; Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|