Dichotomy between the humoral and cellular responses elicited by mRNA and adenoviral vector vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

Analysis of clinical factors and ultrasound features associated with COVID-19 vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy: A large group study

PURPOSE

To investigate factors that distinguish COVID-19 vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy from malignancy or other etiologies.

METHODS

From June 2021 to April 2022, 3859 consecutive female patients had breast and axillary ultrasound (US) at our institution. After exclusions, 592 patients were included in the study. We retrospectively reviewed clinical history and US features of enlarged axillary lymph nodes. Assessed clinical factors included age, vaccination type, dose and vaccination date, and ultrasound features included cortical thickness, shape, marginal irregularity, focal cortical thickening, fatty hilum, and number and anatomic location of enlarged lymph nodes. The seven US features were used to score the severity of lymphadenopathy. Binary logistic models and independent two-sample t-tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Among 592 patients (mean age 49.3 ± 10.3 years), 406(68.6%), 90(15.2%), 42(7.1), 4(0.7%) and 50(8.4%) patients received Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Janssen and cross inoculation of more than one type, respectively. 185(31.3%), 376(63.5%) and 31(5.2%) patients received a first, second and third dose, respectively. The interval between vaccination and US was 30.9 ± 21.5 days. US showed axillary lymphadenopathy (LAP) in 113 patients (19.1%). Clinical factors associated with LAP were age younger than 50 years, mRNA vaccine, first dose and shorter interval(P < 0.05). US features associated with LAP were mean cortical thickness of 4.6 ± 1.63 mm, oval shape (70.8%), smooth margin (53.1%), focal cortical thickening (62.8%) and preserved fatty hilum (84.1%). Using our scoring method, the mean overall score for vaccine-related LAP was 2.45 ± 1.51 points.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of influencing factors and sonographic features can help differentiate COVID-19 vaccine-related adenopathy from other etiologies.

Impact of Exposure to Vaccination and Infection on Cellular and Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 in CVID Patients Through COVID-19 Pandemic

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the kinetics of response against SARS-CoV-2 elicited by vaccination and/or breakthrough infection (occurred after 3 doses of BNT162b2) in a cohort CVID patients.

METHODS

We measured humoral and cellular immunity using quantitative anti-spike antibody (anti-S-IgG) and neutralization assay and specific interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) before and after the third or fourth dose of BNT162b2 and/or after COVID-19.

RESULTS

In CVID, 58.3% seroconverted after 2 doses that increased to 77.8% after 3 doses. Between the second and third dose, there was a decline in humoral compartment that led to titers below the cutoff of 1:10 (MNA90%) in CVID. This was paralleled by a significantly lower proportion (30%) and reduced magnitude of the residual cellular response among CVID. The third dose achieved a lower titer of anti-S and nAb against the Wuhan strain than HC and significantly decreased the rate of those showing solely a positive neutralizing activity and those with simultaneous negativity of IGRA and nAbs; the differences in IGRA were overall reduced with respect to HC. At further sampling after breakthrough SARS-COV-2 infection, mostly in the omicron era, or fourth dose, 6 months after the last event, the residual nAb titer to Wuhan strain was still significantly higher in HC, while there was no significant difference of nAbs to BA.1. The rate of IGRA responders was 65.5% in CVID and 90.5% in HC (p=0.04), while the magnitude of response was similar. None of CVID had double negativity to nAbs and IGRA at the last sampling.

CONCLUSION

This data shows an increase of adaptive immunity in CVID after mRNA vaccination in parallel to boosters, accrual number of exposures and formation of hybrid immunity.

Comparison of post-COVID-19 vaccination hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT between virus-vector vaccine and mRNA vaccine

PURPOSE

We compared hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy (HLN) on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) after virus-vector and mRNA vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 573 participants who underwent FDG PET/CT after receiving a virus-vector vaccine (ChAdOx1, AstraZeneca [AZ] group) or an mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273, Moderna [M] group) from July 2021 to October 2021. The incidence and avidity of HLN were evaluated and correlated with clinical features and vaccine type. The final analysis was conducted with 263 participants in the AZ group and 310 participants in the M group.

RESULTS

The HLN incidence was significantly lower in the AZ group than in the M group (38/263 [14%] vs. 74/310 [24%], p = 0.006). The FDG avidity of HLN was comparable between the two groups. The HLN incidence in both groups was significantly higher within 4 weeks after the vaccination compared with more than 4 weeks. The HLN incidence within 4 weeks of the vaccination was significantly higher in the M group than in the AZ group (p = 0.008), whereas a difference in HLN incidence between the two groups was not observed after the same duration (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

The mRNA mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine was found to be associated with higher glucose hypermetabolism in regional lymph nodes within the first 4 weeks compared with the virus-vector vaccine, as indicated by the presence of HLN on FDG PET/CT. The degree of glucose hypermetabolism was comparable between the two vaccines.

Durability of Vaccine-Induced and Natural Immunity Against COVID-19: A Narrative Review

Vaccines developed against SARS-CoV-2 have proven to be highly effective in preventing symptomatic infection. Similarly, prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to provide substantial protection against reinfection. However, it has become apparent that the protection provided to an individual after either vaccination or infection wanes over time. Waning protection is driven by both waning immunity over time since vaccination or initial infection, and the evolution of new variants of SARS-CoV-2. Both antibody and T/B-cells levels have been investigated as potential correlates of protection post-vaccination or post-infection. The activity of antibodies and T/B-cells provide some potential insight into the underlying causes of waning protection. This review seeks to summarise what is currently known about the waning of protection provided by both vaccination and/or prior infection, as well as the current information on the respective antibody and T/B-cell responses.