The University of Padua salivary-based SARS-CoV-2 surveillance program minimized viral transmission during the second and third pandemic wave

Analytical and clinical evaluations of SNIBE Maglumi chemiluminescent immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in salivary samples

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we describe the analytical and clinical performances of the SNIBE Maglumi SARS-CoV-2 antigen fully-automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (MAG-CLIA) on salivary samples.

METHODS

Limit of detection (LOD), linearity and precision were tested for values close to or below the declared LOD. Clinical performance of MAG-CLIA was evaluated on leftover salivary samples from the healthcare workers (HCW) surveillance program, at the University-Hospital of Padova. Salivary samples were analyzed by Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag, and in case where the values exceeded 0.41 ng/L, further testing was conducted using TaqPathTM COVID-19 RT-PCR (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

RESULTS

The estimated MAG-CLIA LOD was 3 ng/L, with repeatability of 7.5 %. Good linearity was demonstrated by diluting two samples at 52.7 ng/L and 211.4 ng/L. Of the 228 HCW samples, 59/228 (25.9 %) were positive, 169/228 (74.1 %) were negative. MAG-CLIA SARS-CoV-2 sAg median level (and interquartile range [IQR]) was 5.03 ng/L (<0.001-35.8 ng/L) for positive and <0.001 ng/L (<0.001 ng/L) for negative samples. MAG-CLIA AUC was 0.795 (95 % CI: 0.720-0.871). Using the best cut-off, 3.5 ng/L, sensitivity and specificity were 57.1 % (95 % CI: 42.2-71.2 %) and 97.0 % (95 % CI: 93.2-99.0 %), respectively. The agreement with the molecular assay was 88.1 % (Cohen's kappa 0.606 [SE=0.066, p<0.001]).

CONCLUSIONS

The analytical performances of MAG-CLIA are satisfactory, also when values below LOD were tested. In saliva samples, although specificity was elevated, clinical performance was not comparable with that on nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS).

Incidence and Determinants of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infections After Booster Dose in a Large European Multicentric Cohort of Health Workers-ORCHESTRA Project

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections (BI) after vaccine booster dose are a relevant public health issue.

METHODS

Multicentric longitudinal cohort study within the ORCHESTRA project, involving 63,516 health workers (HW) from 14 European settings. The study investigated the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 BI after booster dose and its correlation with age, sex, job title, previous infection, and time since third dose.

RESULTS

13,093 (20.6%) BI were observed. The cumulative incidence of BI was higher in women and in HW aged < 50 years, but nearly halved after 60 years. Nurses experienced the highest BI incidence, and administrative staff experienced the lowest. The BI incidence was higher in immunosuppressed HW (28.6%) vs others (24.9%). When controlling for gender, age, job title and infection before booster, heterologous vaccination reduced BI incidence with respect to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.76]. Previous infection protected against asymptomatic infection [Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) of recent infection vs no infection 0.53, 95% CI 0.23-1.20] and even more against symptomatic infections [RRR 0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.25]. Symptomatic infections increased from 70.5% in HW receiving the booster dose since < 64 days to 86.2% when time elapsed was > 130 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of BI after booster is significantly reduced by previous infection, heterologous vaccination, and older ages. Immunosuppression is relevant for increased BI incidence. Time elapsed from booster affects BI severity, confirming the public health usefulness of booster. Further research should focus on BI trend after 4th dose and its relationship with time variables across the epidemics.

New insights into SARS-CoV-2 Lumipulse G salivary antigen testing: accuracy, safety and short TAT enhance surveillance

OBJECTIVES

The rapid, accurate and safe detection of SARS-CoV-2 is the key to improving surveillance and infection containment. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether, after heat/chemical inactivation, SARS-CoV-2 N antigen chemiluminescence (CLEIA) assay in saliva remains a valid alternative to molecular testing.

METHODS

In 2022, 139 COVID-19 inpatients and 467 healthcare workers were enrolled. In 606 self-collected saliva samples (Salivette), SARS-CoV-2 was detected by molecular (TaqPath rRT-PCR) and chemiluminescent Ag assays (Lumipulse G). The effect of sample pre-treatment (extraction solution-ES or heating) on antigen recovery was verified.

RESULTS

Salivary SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay was highly accurate (AUC=0.959, 95% CI: 0.943-0.974), with 90% sensitivity and 92% specificity. Of the 254 antigen positive samples, 29 were false positives. We demonstrated that heterophilic antibodies could be a cause of false positive results. A significant antigen concentration decrease was observed after ES treatment (p=0.0026), with misclassification of 43 samples. Heat had a minimal impact, after treatment the correct classification of cases was maintained.

CONCLUSIONS

CLEIA SARS-CoV-2 salivary antigen provides accurate, timely and high-throughput results that remain accurate also after heat inactivation, thus ensuring a safer work environment. This supports the use of salivary antigen detection by CLEIA in surveillance programs.

SARS-CoV-2 reliably detected in frozen saliva samples stored up to one year

Viability of saliva samples stored for longer than 28 days has not been reported in the literature. The COVID-19 pandemic has spawned new research evaluating various sample types, thus large biobanks have been started. Residual saliva samples from university student surveillance testing were retested on SalivaDirect and compared with original RT-PCR (cycle threshold values) and quantitative antigen values for each month in storage. We conclude that saliva samples stored at -80°C are still viable in detecting SARS-CoV-2 after 12 months of storage, establishing the validity of these samples for future testing.

Ad interim recommendations for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection by the IFCC SARS-CoV-2 variants working group

This document, endorsed by the IFCC Working Group on SARS-CoV-2 Variants, aims to update previous indications for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, taking into consideration the evidence that has emerged after the origin and spread of new lineages and sub-lineages of the virus characterized by mutated genetics and altered biochemical, biological and clinical characteristics. These indications encompass the use of different diagnostic strategies in specific clinical settings, such as high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (symptomatic patients), low risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (asymptomatic subjects) at hospital admission/contact tracing, testing in asymptomatic subjects, in epidemiologic surveys and/or population screening, along with tentative indications for identification of new lineages and/or sub-lineages of SARS-CoV-2.