Neoadjuvant apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial

Effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for the therapy of locally advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective study

The goal of the present study was to appraise the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), as relevant data on its usage in this setting are lacking. A retrospective analysis was implemented on 100 patients with locally advanced CRC who received either neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with XELOX (N=50) or neoadjuvant XELOX alone (N=50). Radiological response and pathological complete response rates were evaluated. Furthermore, the researchers obtained data pertaining to disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, as well as adverse events. The consequences of the present study indicated that the neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with XELOX treatment approach yielded higher rates of radiological objective response (86.0 vs. 68.0%, P=0.032) and major pathological response (46.0 vs. 22.0%, P=0.011) compared with XELOX alone. These findings were further confirmed through multivariate logistic regression analyses (P=0.037 and P=0.008, respectively). Interestingly, the neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with XELOX treatment approach significantly prolonged DFS when compared with XELOX alone (P=0.033). In summary, the administration of neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with XELOX demonstrates superiority over the use of XELOX alone in terms of achieving a more favorable pathological response and a longer duration of DFS in patients diagnosed with locally advanced CRC.

Safety and efficacy of apatinib in combination with chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

The specific first-line regimen for advanced gastric cancer (GC) is still controversial. The benefit of apatinib for first-line treatment of advanced GC remains unknown and needs to be further explored. Eighty-two patients with advanced GC treated in our institution from October 2017 to March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. All individuals had her-2 negative GC and had received at least two cycles of first-line treatment, including 44 patients in the combination treatment group (apatinib in combination with chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy) and 38 patients in the simple chemotherapy group. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of apatinib in combination with chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced GC by comparing the efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events in two groups of patients. The median PFS of the simple chemotherapy group was 9.25 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 6.1-11.2 months), and that of the combination treatment group was 10.9 months (95% CI, 7.9-15.8 months), which was 1.65 months longer than the simple chemotherapy group. Statistically significant differences are shown (P = 0.022). The objective response rate (ORR) of the combination treatment group was 65.9%, and 36.8% in the simple chemotherapy group. Statistically significant differences are shown (P = 0.014). No serious (Grade IV) adverse events occurred in either group. Our study indicates that apatinib in combination with chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced GC exhibits good anti-tumor activity and is well tolerated by patients.

Targeting Angiogenesis Alone and in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Gastroesophageal Malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review critically examines the latest approaches in treating advanced gastroesophageal malignancies. It emphasizes the significance of angiogenesis as a therapeutic target and discusses the potential synergy of combining angiogenesis inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to enhance treatment efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging evidence from clinical trials, such as the INTEGRATE IIa trial with regorafenib and studies involving apatinib and sunitinib, underscores the efficacy of targeting the VEGFR pathway. These studies indicate substantial benefits in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced stages of the disease who have limited treatment options. Additionally, the recent introduction of combination therapies involving ICIs has shown an increased response rate, suggesting a promising direction for future treatment protocols. The landscape of treatment for gastroesophageal malignancies is rapidly evolving. Research is now pivoting from conventional chemotherapy to a more nuanced approach that includes targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Perioperative toripalimab and chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial

Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer, and the addition of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is under investigation. In this randomized, open-label, phase 2 study (NEOSUMMIT-01), patients with resectable gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer clinically staged as cT3-4aN + M0 were randomized (1:1) to receive either three preoperative and five postoperative 3-week cycles of SOX/XELOX (chemotherapy group, n = 54) or PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab plus SOX/XELOX, followed by toripalimab monotherapy for up to 6 months (toripalimab plus chemotherapy group, n = 54). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response or near-complete response rate (tumor regression grade (TRG) 0/1). The results showed that patients in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group achieved a higher proportion of TRG 0/1 than those in the chemotherapy group (44.4% (24 of 54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 30.9%-58.6%) versus 20.4% (11 of 54, 95% CI: 10.6%-33.5%)), and the risk difference of TRG 0/1 between toripalimab plus chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group was 22.7% (95% CI: 5.8%-39.6%; P = 0.009), meeting a prespecified endpoint. In addition, a higher pathological complete response rate (ypT0N0) was observed in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group (22.2% (12 of 54, 95% CI: 12.0%-35.6%) versus 7.4% (4 of 54, 95% CI: 2.1%-17.9%); P = 0.030), and surgical morbidity (11.8% in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group versus 13.5% in the chemotherapy group) and mortality (1.9% versus 0%), and treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events (35.2% versus 29.6%) were comparable between the treatment groups. In conclusion, the addition of toripalimab to chemotherapy significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving TRG 0/1 compared to chemotherapy alone and showed a manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04250948 .

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial

Prospective evidence regarding the combination of programmed cell death (PD)-1 and angiogenesis inhibitors in treating locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is limited. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT04195828), patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (clinical T2-4N + M0) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (CA-SAP) or chemotherapy SAP alone (SAP) for 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR), defined as <10% residual tumor cells in resection specimens. Secondary endpoints included R0 resection rate, radiologic response, safety, overall survival, and progression-free survival. The modified intention-to-treat population was analyzed (CA-SAP [n = 51] versus SAP [n = 53]). The trial has met pre-specified endpoints. CA-SAP was associated with a significantly higher MPR rate (33.3%) than SAP (17.0%, P = 0.044). The CA-SAP group had a significantly higher objective response rate (66.0% versus 43.4%, P = 0.017) and R0 resection rate (94.1% versus 81.1%, P = 0.042) than the SAP group. Nonsurgical grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 17 patients (33.3%) in the CA-SAP group and 14 (26.4%) in the SAP group. Survival results were not reported due to immature data. Camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant regimen was tolerable and associated with favorable responses for LAGC.

FOXA1/MND1/TKT axis regulates gastric cancer progression and oxaliplatin sensitivity via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Drug resistance is a main factor affecting the chemotherapy efficacy of gastric cancer (GC), in which meiosis plays an important role. Therefore, it is urgent to explore the effect of meiosis related genes on chemotherapy resistance.

METHODS

The expression of meiotic nuclear divisions 1 (MND1) in GC was detected by using TCGA and clinical specimens. In vitro and in vivo assays were used to investigate the effects of MND1. The molecular mechanism was determined using luciferase reporter assay, CO-IP and mass spectrometry (MS).

RESULTS

Through bioinformatics, we found that MND1 was highly expressed in platinum-resistant samples. In vitro experiments showed that interference of MND1 significantly inhibited the progression of GC and increased the sensitivity to oxaliplatin. MND1 was significantly higher in 159 GC tissues in comparison with the matched adjacent normal tissues. In addition, overexpression of MND1 was associated with worse survival, advanced TNM stage, and lower pathological grade in patients with GC. Further investigation revealed that forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1) directly binds to the promoter of MND1 to inhibit its transcription. CO-IP and MS assays showed that MND1 was coexpressed with transketolase (TKT). In addition,TKT activated the PI3K/AKT signaling axis and enhanced the glucose uptake and lactate production in GC cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that FOXA1 inhibits the expression of MND1, which can directly bind to TKT to promote GC progression and reduce oxaliplatin sensitivity through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Marine fungus-derived alkaloid inhibits the growth and metastasis of gastric cancer via targeting mTORC1 signaling pathway

Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly aggressive and deadly disease worldwide. Given the limitations of current treatments, it is crucial to discover more effective antitumor drugs. Here, we demonstrated that arthpyrone M (Art-M), a novel 4-hydroxy-2-pyridone alkaloid derived from the marine fungus Arthrinium arundinis, inhibited the proliferation, invasion and migration of GC both in vivo and in vitro. The underlying mechanism of Art-M in GC cells was explored by RNA-sequencing analysis, qRT-PCR and immunoblotting, which demonstrated that Art-M significantly suppressed the mTORC1 pathway by decreasing phosphorylated mTOR and p70S6K. Moreover, Art-M feedback increased the activities of AKT and ERK. Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis revealed that Art-M induced dissociation of Raptor from mTOR and promoted Raptor degradation, leading to the inhibition of mTORC1 activity. Art-M was identified as a novel and potent mTORC1 antagonist. Furthermore, Art-M enhanced GC cell sensitivity to apatinib, and the combination of Art-M and apatinib showed better efficacy in the treatment of GC. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Art-M is a promising candidate drug for the treatment of GC by suppressing the mTORC1 pathway.

Case Report: Clinical application of continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Platinum-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy is the standard neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer in China, but it does not improve the survival benefit of patients. In recent years, the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or targeted drugs in neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer has achieved certain efficacy, but the survival benefit of patients is still not obvious. Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy, as a method of regional therapy, has been widely used in the treatment of many advanced tumors and achieved remarkable curative effect. The role of arterial infusion chemotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer is not clear. We describe two patients with locally advanced gastric cancer treated with continuous arterial infusion neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two patients received continuous arterial infusion of chemotherapy drugs for 50 hours, the drugs were pumped into the main feeding artery of the tumor through the arterial catheter. A total of 4 cycles were followed, then undergone surgical resection. The postoperative pathological pCR of two patients was 100%, TRG was 0 grade, and no further anti-tumor therapy was required after operation, achieving clinical cure. During the treatment period, no serious adverse events occurred in either patient. These results suggest that continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy may be a new adjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Response Evaluation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The method of response evaluation following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resectable gastric cancer has been widely debated. An essential prerequisite is the ability to stratify patients into subsets of different long-term survival rates based on the response mode. Histopathological measures of regression have their limitations, and interest resides in CT-based methods that can be used in everyday settings.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study (2007-2016) on 171 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who were receiving NAC. Two methods of response evaluation were investigated: a strict radiological procedure using RECIST (downsizing), and a composite radiological/pathological procedure comparing the initial radiological TNM stage to the pathological ypTNM stage (downstaging). Clinicopathological variables that could predict the response were searched for, and correlations between the response mode and long-term survival rates were assessed.

RESULTS

RECIST failed to identify half of the patients progressing to metastatic disease, and it was unable to assign patients to subsets with different long-term survival rates based on the response mode. However, the TNM stage response mode did achieve this objective. Following re-staging, 48% (78/164) were downstaged, 15% (25/164) had an unchanged stage, and 37% (61/164) were upstaged. A total of 9% (15/164) showed a histopathological complete response. The 5-year overall survival rate was 65.3% (95% CI 54.7-75.9%) for TNM downstaged cases, 40.0% (95% CI 20.8-59.2%) for stable disease, and 14.8% (95% CI 6.0-23.6%) for patients with TNM progression, p < 0.001. In a multivariable ordinal regression model, the Lauren classification and tumor site were the only significant determinants of the response mode.

CONCLUSIONS

Downsizing, as a method for evaluating the response to NAC in gastric cancer, is discouraged. TNM re-staging by comparing the baseline radiological CT stage to the pathological stage following NAC is suggested as a useful method that may be used in everyday situations.

Tailoring second-line or above therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: A multicenter real-world study

Background: There is currently still a lack of effective therapeutic manner after the failure of first-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different treatment strategies as second-line or above therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

Methods: This was an observational multicenter real-world study. From January 2018 to December 2020, advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients who have failed prior therapy were enrolled and treated with chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) + chemotherapy or TKIs + ICIs (immune checkpoint inhibitors). In this study, progression free survival (PFS) was the primary end-point. Other evaluation indicators were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and drug toxicities.

Results: 162 patients were enrolled, of which 61 patients received chemotherapy, 47 patients received TKIs plus chemotherapy, and 54 patients received TKIs + ICIs. No statistically significant difference existed in ORR among groups (16.4% vs. 19.1% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.924). Patients who received TKIs plus chemotherapy obtained better DCR compared with the chemotherapy group (78.7% vs. 54.1%, p = 0.008), and simultaneously, the median PFS (3.3 m vs. 2.8 m, p = 0.001) and OS (8.0 m vs. 5.8 m, p = 0.005) in TKIs plus chemotherapy group were superior to chemotherapy group. Consistent results were observed in subgroup analysis, including sex, age, ECOG, number of metastatic sites and treatment line. No statistically differences were found between TKIs + ICIs and the chemotherapy group concerning DCR (63.0% vs. 54.1%, p = 0.336), median PFS (3.0 m vs. 2.8 m, p = 0.051) and OS (5.2 m vs. 5.8 m, p = 0.260). Different treatment manner present a special spectrum of adverse events (AEs), and the incidence of Grade 3–4 AEs were 31.1%, 38.3% and 18.5%, respectively.

Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic TKIs plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior second-line or above therapeutic efficacy for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer with well tolerated toxicity. However, TKIs + ICIs failed to demonstrate a clinical advantage over chemotherapy.

Pathological complete remission of a locally advanced gastric cancer by neoadjuvant therapy "sandwich" regimen as SOXAP+ fluorescence laparoscopic surgery +SOXAP: Case report

Gastric cancer is an extremely burdensome and challenging malignant tumor with a high incidence and a high mortality rate, which seriously results in a thorny prognosis for oncology patients. Surgical treatment combined with postoperative adjuvant therapy are currently the most regular methods for the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but long-term efficacy is not an ideal outcome. Therefore, herein we report a case of a pathologically confirmed complete remission of LAGC treated by the administration of neoadjuvant therapy combined with fluorescence laparoscopic surgery with more significant long-term survival. With that being mentioned, a 60-year-old man was diagnosed as moderately differentiated gastric antrum adenocarcinoma (T3N1M0). Moreover, after three cycles of SOXAP regimen (Oxaliplatin + S-1+Apatinib + Camrelizumab), and it was found out that the gastric lesion was smaller in size than before, total laparoscopic radical resection of the distal gastric cancer was performed at the time. Furthermore, no tumor cells were seen in gross specimen post operatively, achieving complete remission of the case. In addition, he also underwent three cycles of SOXAP regimen postoperatively. Interestingly and assuredly, he was in good health after an almost 2-year follow up period. These results suggest that this therapeutic regimen is a promising treatment modality for the management of locally advanced gastric cancers.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib combined with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for locally advanced gastric cancer patients: a multicentered, prospective, cohort study

PURPOSE

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and apatinib have been utilized in metastatic gastric cancer patients. The current study aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant S-1 plus oxaliplatin combined with PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib (SOXPA) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients.

METHODS

This two-centered, prospective, cohort study analyzed 30 resectable LAGC patients receiving SOXPA as neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Two (6.7%), 18 (60.0%), and 10 (33.3%) patients achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD), separately. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 66.7% and 100.0%, respectively. The R0 resection rate was 93.3%. Beyond that, 6 (20.0%), 18 (60.0%), and 6 (20.0%) patients achieved grade 1, 2, and 3 pathological responses. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 20%. The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 96.6% and 77.7% respectively; meanwhile, the 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.6% and 90.1%, separately. What's more, better clinical response (P = 0.046); achievement of ORR (P = 0.014), and better pathological response (P = 0.020) were correlated with longer DFS. Besides, ORR achievement was linked with longer OS (P = 0.040). Most adverse events were relatively mild and manageable. Grade 3 adverse events included leukopenia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, nausea and vomiting. No grade 4 adverse events were witnessed.

CONCLUSION

SOXPA as neoadjuvant therapy achieves a satisfying clinical response, pathological response, survival profile, and tolerable safety in LAGC patients.

Apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients: a prospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Apatinib, a small molecule targeting VEGFR2, is commonly used for advanced gastric cancer treatment. This prospective cohort study further investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Ninety-six locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients were divided into the apatinib plus chemotherapy group (N = 45) and chemotherapy group (N = 51) according to their chosen treatment. Apatinib was administered (375 mg/day), and S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (CapOx) was given as chemotherapy, for 3 cycles with 3 weeks a cycle before surgery.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (62.2% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.015) and pathological response grade (P = 0.011) were better; meanwhile, the tumor-resection rate (95.6% vs. 84.3%, P = 0.143) and pathological complete response rate (23.3% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.080) exhibited increasing trends (without statistical significance) in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy group. Additionally, the apatinib plus chemotherapy group achieved prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.019) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.047) compared with the chemotherapy group. After adjusted by multivariate Cox's regression analysis, neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy was still superior to chemotherapy regarding DFS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.277, P = 0.014) and OS (HR: 0.316, P = 0.038). Notably, the incidences of adverse events between the two groups were not different (P > 0.050). Moreover, the most common adverse events of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy were leukopenia (42.2%), fatigue (37.8%), hypertension (37.8%), and anemia (31.1%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy realizes better clinical response, pathological response, survival profile, and non-inferior safety profile compared to chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma.