Clinical course of IPF in Italian patients during 12 months of observation: results from the FIBRONET observational study

A Real-World Prognosis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Special Reference to the Role of Antifibrotic Agents for the Elderly

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common and severe form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, and its prevalence increases with age. In the era of pre-antifibrotic agents, the median survival time of Japanese patients with IPF is 35 months, with a 5-year survival rate in western countries ranging from 20% to 40%. The prevalence of IPF is highest in elderly patients aged ≥75 years; however, the efficacy and safety of long-term use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib are not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of the sole use of antifibrotic agents (pirfenidone or nintendanib) for IPF in the elderly.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed patients with IPF who were diagnosed and treated with either pirfenidone or nintedanib in our hospital between 2008 and 2019. We excluded patients with the subsequent use of both antifibrotic agents. We examined the survival probability and frequency of acute exacerbation, with focus on long-term use (≥1 year), elderly patients (≥75 years of age), and disease severity.

RESULTS

We identified 91 patients with IPF (male to female ratio: 63 to 28, age 42 to 90 years). The numbers of patients with disease severity classified by JRS (I/II/III/IV) and GAP stage (I/II/III) were (38/6/17/20) and (39/36/6), respectively. The survival probabilities were comparable between the elderly (n = 46) and non-elderly groups (n = 45, p = 0.877). After the initiation of antifibrotic agents, the cumulative incidence ratio of acute exacerbation of IPF was significantly lower in the early stage (GAP stage I, n = 20) than in the progressive stage of disease (GAP stages II and III, n = 20, p = 0.028). A similar trend was noted in the JRS disease severity classification (I, II vs. III, IV) (n = 27 vs. n = 13, p = 0.072). In the long-term treatment (≥1 year) group (n = 40), the survival probabilities at 2 and 5 years after treatment initiation were 89.0% and 52.4%, respectively, which did not reach the median survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in elderly patients (≥75 years of age), antifibrotic agents demonstrated positive effects on survival probability and the frequency of acute exacerbation. These positive effects would be improved for earlier JRS/GAP stages or long-term use.

Clinical Characteristics and Disease Course of Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease Patients in a Real-World Setting

Background and Objectives: This single-center retrospective study was conducted to describe clinical characteristics and the disease course of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Materials and Methods: The study included adult patients with fibrosing ILD (IPF, non-IPF fibrosing ILD (F-ILD), and non-IPF progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF)) treated between 2014 and 2017. Patients were followed annually from the first visit until the end of the study period in 2019. Data were collected from the Turku University Hospital data lake and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 591 patients formed the patient cohort: 110 had IPF, 194 F-ILD, 142 PPF, and the remaining 145 patients were uncertain, F-ILD-U, whose disease progression nature could not be confirmed by FVC measurements. There were more males in each patient group and median age of the groups was similar, although there were younger patients in the PPF, F-ILD, and F-ILD-U groups. PPF patients had more UIP pattern than F-ILD patients. Exposure-related ILDs were clearly the most found ILD diagnoses for both PPF and F-ILD, followed by unclassifiable IIP. Baseline FVC % predicted reduction in every group was moderate. Half of the patients in each group had comorbidities, and the most common were cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, sleep apnea, and chronic lower respiratory diseases; F-ILD-U patients had malignant diseases as well. IPF patients had less medications than the other groups. Glucocorticoids were the most used medication in all patient groups. More PPF and F-ILD patients remained in the follow-up than IPF and F-ILD-U patients. Similarly, mortality of F-ILD-U was the highest, followed by IPF. Evolvement of lung function, oxygen use, and number of acute hospitalizations were similar for IPF and PPF patients whereas the corresponding results were always better for F-ILD patients. Conclusions: The disease course of IPF and PPF was similar, and PPF patient amount exceeded the amount of IPF patients.

Therapeutic decisions in a cohort of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicenter, prospective survey from Poland

Background

Pirfenidone and nintedanib are considered as the standard of care in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but there is no consensus as to which of these two agents should be regarded as first-line treatment.

Objective

To provide real-world data on therapeutic decisions of pulmonary specialists, particularly the choice of the antifibrotic drug in patients with IPF.

Methods

This was a multicenter, prospective survey collecting clinical data of patients with IPF considered as candidates for antifibrotic treatment between September 2019 and December 2020. Clinical characteristics and information on the therapeutic approach were retrieved. Statistical evaluation included multiple logistic regression analysis with stepwise model selection.

Results

Data on 188 patients [74.5% male, median age 73 (interquartile range, 68-78) years] considered for antifibrotic therapy were collected. Treatment was initiated in 138 patients, while 50 patients did not receive an antifibrotic, mainly due to the lack of consent for treatment and IPF severity. Seventy-two patients received pirfenidone and 66 received nintedanib. Dosing protocol (p < 0.01) and patient preference (p = 0.049) were more frequently associated with the choice of nintedanib, while comorbidity profile (p = 0.0003) and concomitant medication use (p = 0.03) were more frequently associated with the choice of pirfenidone. Age (p = 0.002), lung transfer factor for carbon monoxide (TL_CO) (p = 0.001), and gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with the qualification for the antifibrotic treatment.

Conclusion

This real-world prospective study showed that dose protocol and patient preference were more frequently associated with the choice of nintedanib, while the comorbidity profile and concomitant medication use were more frequently associated with the choice of pirfenidone. Age, TL_CO, and history of gastrointestinal bleeding were significant factors influencing the decision to initiate antifibrotic therapy.

Incidental discovery of interstitial lung disease: diagnostic approach, surveillance and perspectives

The incidental discovery of pre-clinical interstitial lung disease (ILD) has led to the designation of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), a radiological entity defined as the incidental finding of computed tomography (CT) abnormalities affecting more than 5% of any lung zone. Two recent documents have redefined the borders of this entity and made the recommendation to monitor patients with ILA at risk of progression. In this narrative review, we will focus on some of the limits of the current approach, underlying the potential for progression to full-blown ILD of some patients with ILA and the numerous links between subpleural fibrotic ILA and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Considering the large prevalence of ILA in the general population (7%), restricting monitoring only to cases considered at risk of progression appears a reasonable approach. However, this suggestion should not prevent pulmonary physicians from pursuing an early diagnosis of ILD and timely treatment where appropriate. In cases of suspected ILD, whether found incidentally or not, the pulmonary physician is still required to make a correct ILD diagnosis according to current guidelines, and eventually treat the patient accordingly.

In patients with interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), monitoring of those at risk of progression is currently recommended, and pulmonary physicians should pursue an early diagnosis when ILA become clinically significant to facilitate timely treatment https://bit.ly/3HKOQc8

Endoscopic Options for Moderate COPD, Chronic Bronchitis, and Uncontrolled Asthma

Until now, interventional therapies for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been available in the form of lung volume reduction procedures as end-stage options. Currently, the range of indications is expanding to include earlier stages of the diseases. Lung denervation is available for moderate COPD, and patients with chronic bronchitis are being evaluated for endoscopic goblet cell ablation. Rheoplasty, metered spray cryo technique, and Karakoca resector balloon are used for this indication. But also, for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, several techniques are available today. In addition to thermoplasty as a long-proven procedure, new and currently under investigation is the targeted lung denervation.Most of these techniques are currently being tested in large pivotal trials and it will soon become clear in which phenotype which technique will be used in the different forms and stages of obstructive diseases. The current paper presents the techniques and the currently available literature.

Effects of low-dose pirfenidone on survival and lung function decline in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): Results from a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown etiology. In several randomized clinical trials, and in the clinical practice, pirfenidone is used to effectively and safely treat IPF. However, sometimes it is difficult to use the dose of pirfenidone used in clinical trials. This study evaluated the effects of low-dose pirfenidone on IPF disease progression and patient survival in the real-world.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study enrolled IPF patients seen at the time of diagnosis at a single center from 2008 to 2018. Longitudinal clinical and laboratory data were prospectively collected. We compared the clinical characteristics, survival, and pulmonary function decline between patients treated and untreated with various dose of pirfenidone.

RESULTS

Of 295 IPF patients, 100 (33.9%) received pirfenidone and 195 (66.1%) received no antifibrotic agent. Of the 100 patients who received pirfenidone, 24 (24%), 50 (50%), and 26 (26%), respectively, were given 600, 1200, and 1800 mg pirfenidone daily. The mean survival time was 57.03 ± 3.90 months in the no-antifibrotic drug group and 73.26 ± 7.87 months in the pirfenidone-treated group (p = 0.027). In the unadjusted analysis, the survival of the patients given pirfenidone was significantly better (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.99, p = 0.04). After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and the GAP score [based on gender (G), age (A), and two physiological lung parameters (P)], survival remained better in the patients given pirfenidone (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.85, p = 0.006). In terms of pulmonary function, the decreases in forced vital capacity (%), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%) and the diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (%) were significantly smaller (p = 0.000, p = 0.001, and p = 0.007, respectively) in patients given pirfenidone.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose pirfenidone provided beneficial effects on survival and pulmonary function decline in the real-world practice.

Radiological and Physiological Predictors of IPF Mortality

Background and Objectives: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has a variable clinical course, which ranges from being asymptomatic to progressive respiratory failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the novel clinical parameters of IPF patients who receive an anti-fibrotic agent. Materials and Methods: From January 2011 to January 2021, we identified 39 IPF patients at Okinawa Chubu Hospital. Clinical information was obtained, such as laboratory data, pulmonary function test (PFT) results, and chest images, including of soft tissue thickness and the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) pattern at diagnosis. Results: The mean age was 72.9 ± 7.0 (53–85); 27 patients were men and 12 were women. The mean body mass index was 25.1 ± 3.9 (17.3–35). Twenty-four were active smokers and the median number of packs per year was 20. Regarding laboratory findings, mean white blood cell (WBC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Krebs Von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) values were 7816 ± 1859, 248 ± 47, and 1615 ± 1503, respectively. In PFT, the mean percent predicted FVC, percent predicted total lung capacity, percent predicted functional residual capacity (FRC), and percent predicted diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) were 66.8 ± 14.9%, 71.8 ± 13.7%, 65 ± 39.6%, and 64.6 ± 27.9%, respectively. In chest radiological findings, soft tissue thickness at the right 9th rib was 26.4 ± 8.8 mm. Regarding chest HRCT patterns, 15 showed the definite usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, 16 showed the probable UIP pattern, and eight showed the indeterminate for UIP pattern. In the treatment, 24 patients received pirfenidone and 15 patients took nintedanib. The mean observation period was 38.6 ± 30.6 months and 24 patients died. The median survival time was 32.4 months (0.9–142.5). Multivariate analysis adjusted for age showed that both soft tissue thickness [Hazard ratio (HR): 0.912, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.859–0.979, p-value: 0.009] and percent FRC [HR: 0.980, 95% CI: 0.967–0.992, p-value: 0.002] were robust predictors of IPF mortality. Conclusions: In IPF patients treated with anti-fibrotic agents, both soft tissue thickness at the right 9th rib shown on the chest radiograph and %FRC can be novel predictors of IPF mortality.

Patient Reported Experiences and Delays During the Diagnostic Pathway for Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Multinational European Survey

Introduction: Pulmonary fibrosis includes a spectrum of diseases and is incurable. There is a variation in disease course, but it is often progressive leading to increased breathlessness, impaired quality of life, and decreased life expectancy. Detection of pulmonary fibrosis is challenging, which contributes to considerable delays in diagnosis and treatment. More knowledge about the diagnostic journey from patients' perspective is needed to improve the diagnostic pathway. The aims of this study were to evaluate the time to diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis, identify potential reasons for delays, and document patients emotions.

Methods: Members of European patient organisations, with a self-reported diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis, were invited to participate in an online survey. The survey assessed the diagnostic pathway retrospectively, focusing on four stages: (1) time from initial symptoms to first appointment in primary care; (2) time to hospital referral; (3) time to first hospital appointment; (4) time to final diagnosis. It comprised open-ended and closed questions focusing on time to diagnosis, factors contributing to delays, diagnostic tests, patient emotions, and information provision.

Results: Two hundred and seventy three participants (214 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 28 sarcoidosis, 31 other) from 13 countries responded. Forty percent of individuals took ≥1 year to receive a final diagnosis. Greatest delays were reported in stage 1, with only 50.2% making an appointment within 3 months. For stage 2, 73.3% reported a hospital referral within three primary care visits. However, 9.9% reported six or more visits. After referral, 76.9% of patients were assessed by a specialist within 3 months (stage 3) and 62.6% received a final diagnosis within 3 months of their first hospital visit (stage 4). Emotions during the journey were overall negative. A major need for more information and support during and after the diagnostic process was identified.

Conclusion: The time to diagnose pulmonary fibrosis varies widely across Europe. Delays occur at each stage of the diagnostic pathway. Raising awareness about pulmonary fibrosis amongst the general population and healthcare workers is essential to shorten the time to diagnosis. Furthermore, there remains a need to provide patients with sufficient information and support at all stages of their diagnostic journey.