Efficacy of a long-term pulmonary rehabilitation maintenance program for COPD patients in a real-life setting: a 5-year cohort study

Pulmonary Rehabilitation Once a Week for One Year in a Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to alleviate dyspnea, increase exercise capacity, and improve quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, such PR programs have focused on short-term effects. Thus, this study aimed to report our experience with a COPD patient who underwent PR once a week for one year. An 84-year-old male with stage II COPD, which was classified by the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease, presented symptoms of dyspnea while walking. The patient underwent PR once a week for one year, which included exercise training, self-management support, instructions on breathing during exertion, and respiratory muscle stretching. Before and after PR, we assessed the patient's physical function, dyspnea, and quality of life. For one year, no adverse events were recorded. We observed that the patient's physical function, dyspnea, and quality of life improved over time. In particular, his six-minute walking distance (6MWD) reached the minimal clinically important difference at three months and the predictive value of 6MWD for healthy adults at six months. The present case showed that a PR program conducted once a week for one year might be feasible and effective.

[Medico-economic evaluation of the PRADO-BPCO post-exacerbation support program]

INTRODUCTION

The "Programme d'Accompagnement du retour à Domicile" (PRADO) COPD is a home discharge support program dedicated to organizing care pathways following hospitalization for COPD exacerbation. This study aimed at assessing its medico-economic impact.

METHODS

This was a retrospective database study of patients included in the PRADO BPCO between 2017 and 2019. Data were extracted from the National Health Data System. A control group was built using propensity score matching. Morbi-mortality and costs (national health insurance perspective) were measured during the year following hospitalization.

RESULTS

While the proportion of patients with a care pathway complying with recommendations from the National Health Authority was higher in the PRADO group, there was no significant effect on mortality and 12-month rehospitalization. In the PRADO group, the rehospitalization rate was lower when the care pathway was optimal. Healthcare costs per patient were 670 € higher in the PRADO group.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRADO COPD improves quality of care but without decreasing rehospitalizations and mortality, although rehospitalizations did decrease among PRADO group patients benefiting from an optimal care pathway.

Persons With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and High Levels of Activation Improved Their Physical Activity Skills After an Educational Session

Background

Daily physical activity is part of the self-management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and didactic information sessions may be insufficient for the provision of these skills. Prior activation can determine sensitivity to these sessions. We evaluated whether the activation in patients with COPD, as measured by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM)-13 questionnaire, determined their responses to an educational group session on physical activity (PA), which were measured with actigraphy by the number of steps/day.

Methods

We conducted an uncontrolled clinical trial in an outpatient clinic with 75 patients with nonexacerbating COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 second 30%-80%) who were selected consecutively. Patients were provided with an actigraph that they used for 15 days and completed the PAM-13 questionnaire. On the eighth day, they attended a group educational session where they were given PA information. We compared the changes in activity after the session by pooled PAM levels and the correlation between the change in the number of steps/day and the PAM-13 questionnaire.

Results

A total of 26 patients had activation levels of 1-2, while 49 patients had levels of 3-4. After the session, patients in Levels 1-2 decreased their number of steps (-596±42), while those in Levels 3-4 increased them (680±253, p<0.01). The level of activation was positively correlated with change in the number of steps/day (p<0.05).

Conclusion

COPD patients with greater activation showed greater improvements in daily PA after a group educational session.

Maintenance Pulmonary Rehabilitation: An Update and Future Directions

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines recommend pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for individuals with COPD to improve exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and reduce symptoms of dyspnea. For cost-effectiveness in COPD care, PR is second only to smoking cessation. However, PR programs typically last 9-12 weeks. The benefits of PR in terms of exercise capacity and HRQOL often decrease toward pre-PR levels as early as 3-6 months after completing PR if patients do not continue to engage in exercise. This review will (1) briefly summarize the efficacy data that informed the 2023 American Thoracic Society (ATS) clinical practice guidelines for maintenance PR, (2) discuss exercise components of maintenance PR studied since 2020 when the last papers were included in the ATS guidelines, (3) explore future directions for delivery of maintenance PR using technology-mediated models, and (4) examine the need for behavior change techniques informed by theoretical models that underpin long-term behavior change. This review will focus on persons with COPD who have completed an out-patient core initial PR program as most of the data on maintenance PR have been published in this patient population. Core PR typically implies a facility-based initial intensive structured program. All patients who complete a core initial PR program should be counseled by PR staff at the discharge visit to engage in ongoing exercise. This usual care is equally as important as referral to a formal PR maintenance program. It is critical to emphasize that usual care after core initial PR means all patients should be supported to participate in regular ongoing exercise, regardless of whether supervised maintenance PR is available. Currently, the optimal frequency, exercise and/or physical activity content, and delivery mode for maintenance PR in persons with COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases remain unknown. Patient safety and degree of in-person supervision required due to the severity of the underlying lung disease need to be considered. Future research of maintenance PR should be underpinned by behavior change techniques. Finally, in the setting of finite resources, balancing the competing priorities of core initial programs with those of maintenance PR programs needs to be achieved.

Effects and long-term outcomes of endurance versus resistance training as an adjunct to standard medication in patients with stable COPD: a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Comparisons between endurance training (ET) and resistance training (RT) have produced equivocal findings in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The purpose of our study is to investigate the effectiveness and long-term outcomes of adding ET and RT to conventional medical treatment in patients with COPD. A secondary objective is to investigate the clinical improvements resulting from exercise training in patients with different disease severities.

METHODS

The study was a multicenter, prospective trial in people with stable COPD. The cohort was randomized to three groups: individualized medical treatment group (MT), MT + endurance training group (MT + ET) and MT + resistance training group (MT + RT). Exercise was performed 3 times weekly over a 12-week period. The endpoints of exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, COPD symptoms, lung function, and anxiety and depression questionnaires were re-evaluated at baseline, at the completion of the intervention and at 6 and 12-month follow-up. According to the COPD assessment tool offered by GOLD guidelines, patients were stratified into GOLD A and B groups and GOLD C and D groups for further subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included 366 patients, 328 of them completed the study protocol over 12 months (the PP-population). There were no significant differences in the primary outcome, quality of life, between patients who underwent medical treatment (MT) alone, MT + endurance training (MT + ET), or MT + resistance training (MT + RT) at the completion of the intervention, 6-, or 12-month follow-up. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between MT, MT + RT, or MT + ET groups concerning the primary outcome, exercise capacity (3MWD), after initial 3 months of intervention. However, a small statistically significant difference was noted in favor of MT + ET compared to MT + RT at 12 months (ITT: Δ3MWD in ET vs RT = 5.53 m, 95% confidence interval: 0.87 to 13.84 m, P = 0.03) (PP: Δ3MWD in ET vs RT = 7.67 m, 95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 16.27 m, P = 0.04). For patients in the GOLD C and D groups, improvement in quality of life following ET or RT was significantly superior to medical intervention alone. Furthermore, upon completion of the exercise regimen, RT exhibited a greater improvement in anxiety compared to ET in these patients (ITT: ΔHAD-A at 3-month: RT = -1.63 ± 0.31 vs ET = -0.61 ± 0.33, p < 0.01) (PP: ΔHAD-A at 3-month: RT = -1.80 ± 0.36 vs ET = -0.75 ± 0.37, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presents evidence of the beneficial effects of ET and RT in combination with standard medical treatment, as well as the long-term effects over time after the intervention. While the statistically significant effect favoring ET over RT in terms of exercise capacity was observed, it should be interpreted cautiously. Patients in severe stages of COPD may derive greater benefits from either ET or RT and should be encouraged accordingly. These findings have implications for exercise prescription in patients with COPD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-INR-16009892 (17, Nov, 2016).

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on patients with different chronic respiratory diseases during hospitalization

The impact of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on patients with different chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) during hospitalization has not been thoroughly evaluated before. The objectives of the current research were to assess the effect of comprehensive PR management on inpatients' self-management skills, exercise capacity, nutrition assessment and mental health issues and explore whether impacts of PR vary in different CRDs. This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data from 272 inpatients with CRDs receiving PR management during hospitalization between October 2020 and March 2022 in Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital. Significant improvements were found in the patients' ability of daily living (ADL), dyspnea (assessed by modified medical research council dyspnea scale (MMRC)), handgrip strength, maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure, anxiety (using the 7-item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7)) and depression (the 9-item patient health questionnaire score (PHQ-9)). There was no significant change in nutrition assessment pre-post PR management during hospitalization. The subgroup analyses were conducted on hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiectasis, asthma, interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) and other CRDs (e.g., lung cancer, diaphragm hemiparesis, obesity, etc.). The results showed that ADL, MMRC score, MIP, MEP, PHQ-9 score improved in all subgroups with CRDs. Handgrip strength of left hand was increased in COPD inpatients and anxiety was improved in all subgroups except for ILDs. Comprehensive PR management was necessary and beneficial for patients with different CRDs during hospitalization.

Implementation of virtual pulmonary rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences and perceptions of patients and healthcare providers

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) plays an important role in the management of symptomatic patients with chronic respiratory diseases (CRD). While studies have investigated the feasibility and efficacy of virtual PR (VPR), it is important to understand the experiences of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) during the rapid digital health transformation that occurred in the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the experiences and perspectives of patients and HCPs who participated in VPR during the pandemic.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with CRD patients and HCPs. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach and a team-based inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants included 11 HCPs (7 female; 29-55 years) and 19 CRD patients (11 male; 62-83 years; 15 COPD, 4 COPD/ILD). Three major themes and 10 subthemes were identified: i) the pandemic response: a 'trial by fire' (navigating uncertainty, emotional impact of change, shifting practice amid complexity); ii) beyond the emergency: navigating a 'new normal' (eligibility and assessment for VPR, virtual exercise, virtual education and resources, clinical supervision and patient safety); and iii) care beyond boundaries: the implications of using technology for PR (benefits and limitations of technology, psychosocial implications, VPR in the future).

CONCLUSION

The pivot to VPR was acknowledged as positive by both patients and HCPs although both groups were mindful of the implementation challenges. These findings provide insight into the experience of HCPs and patients in introducing VPR in response to the pandemic and will inform future implementation of VPR for individuals with CRD.

The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on childhood asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a comprehensive nursing intervention for lung function improvement in patients with respiratory diseases. This systematic review focused on further exploration of the unclear impacts of PR on childhood asthma.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and other databases were searched until May 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of PR (including exercise training and education) and routine care on childhood asthma were included. Study selection, data extraction, and bias risk assessment were performed independently by two investigators.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Fourteen RCTs involving 1401 patients were included. Relative to the control group, the total scores of the asthma quality of life questionnaire were evidently improved in the experimental group, including motor domain scores (MD=0.88, 95% CI: 0.67-1.09), symptom domain scores (MD=1.23, 95% CI: 0.61-1.85), and affective domain scores (MD=1.38, 95% CI: 0.63-2.14). Besides, 6-min walk distance (MD=2.01, 95% CI: 0.86-3.15) and asthma control test (MD=0.31, 95% CI: 0.02-0.60) were prominently improved. However, the maximum oxygen uptake (MD=0.81, 95% CI: -0.2 to 1.82) was not markedly improved. The forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD=0.42, 95% CI: -0.29 to 1.13), and forced vital capacity (MD=0.07, 95% CI: -0.14 to 0.28) were not remarkably improved. There was an evident improvement in the peak expiratory flow (MD=1.22, 95% CI: 0.15-2.30).

CONCLUSIONS

PR improves some lung functions, exercise tolerance and the quality of life of children with asthma, and it might work as a supplementary therapy for the treatment of childhood asthma. Moreover, more RCTs of high quality and in large sample size are needed for further confirmation.

Long-term efficiency of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis, and asthma: Does it differ?

BACKGROUND

The long-term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and maintenance programs in obstructive pulmonary diseases have not been sufficiently investigated, particularly in diseases other than COPD. This retrospective study aimed to examine the long-term results of individualized comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHODS

This study is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Between 2010 and 2019, 269 patients with chronic airway obstruction were treated in our multidisciplinary PR center at a tertiary training and research hospital, and they were divided into three groups based on their diagnosis: COPD, bronchiectasis, and asthma. Patients' perceptions of dyspnea, exercise capacity, inspiratory and peripheral muscle strength, body composition, quality of life, and psychosocial status were compared at the beginning, end, and 12th and 24th months of PR.

RESULTS

Improvements in dyspnea perception remained longer in asthmatics than in the other two groups. The increases in exercisecapacity in the bronchiectasis and asthma groups lasted two years. All groups maintained their respiratory muscle strength gains at the end of the second year. Improvements in hand grip strength in the COPD and bronchiectasis groups have been sustained for two years, but in the asthma group, enhancements were lost in the second year. Even after the second year, quality of life was still better than the baseline in all groups, despite a worsening in the first year. However, groups anxiety and depression improvements were not sustained after the first year.

DISCUSSION

The long-term effectiveness of PR in patients with bronchiectasis and asthma was similar to that of COPD patients. Therefore,multidisciplinary, comprehensive PR programs should be integrated into the management of patients with bronchiectasis and asthma. We also recommend structured follow-up programs to maintain gains and to detect the need for rerehabilitation.

Application of the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of telehealth pulmonary rehabilitation in a randomized controlled trial among African-American and Hispanic patients with advanced stage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) decreases rehospitalization for people with COPD. However, less than 2% receive PR, partly due to lack of referral and sparsity of PR facilities. This disparity is particularly pronounced in African American and Hispanic persons with COPD. Telehealth-provided PR could increase access and improve health outcomes.

METHODS

We applied the RE-AIM framework in a post-hoc analysis of our mixed methods RCT comparing referral to Telehealth-delivered PR (TelePR) versus standard PR (SPR) for African American and Hispanic COPD patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation. Both arms received a referral to PR for 8 weeks, social worker follow-up, and surveys administered at baseline, 8 weeks, 6, and 12 months. PR sessions were conducted twice a week for 90 min each (16 sessions total). Quantitative data were analyzed using 2-sample t tests or nonparametric Wilcoxon tests for continuous data and χ²/Fisher exact tests for categorical data. Logistic regression-estimated odds ratios (ORs) were used for the intention-to-treat primary outcome. Qualitative interviews were conducted at the end of the study to assess adherence and satisfaction and were analyzed using inductive and deductive methods. The goal was to understand Reach (whether the target population was able to be enrolled), Effectiveness (primary outcome was a composite of 6-month COPD rehospitalization and death), Adoption (proportion of people willing to initiate the program), Implementation (whether the program was able to be executed as intended, and Maintenance (whether the program was continued).

RESULTS

Two hundred nine people enrolled out of a 276-recruitment goal. Only 85 completed at least one PR session 57/111 (51%) TelePR; 28/98 (28%) SPR. Referral to TelePR compared to SPR did not decrease the composite outcome of 6-month COPD-readmission rate/death (OR1.35;95%CI 0.69,2.66). There was significant reduction in fatigue (PROMIS® scale) from baseline to 8-weeks in TelePR compared to SPR (MD-1.34; ± SD4.22; p = 0.02). Participants who received TelePR experienced improvements from baseline in several outcomes (ie, before and after 8 weeks of PR) in the following: COPD symptoms, knowledge about COPD management, fatigue, and functional capacity. Among the patients who had 1 initial visit, adherence rates were similar (TelePR arm, 59% of sessions; SPR arm, 63%). No intervention-related adverse events occurred. Barriers to PR adoption included difficulty or reluctance to complete medical clearances and beliefs about PR efficacy. Notably, only 9 participants sustained exercise after program completion. Maintenance of the program was not possible due to low insurance reimbursement and sparsity of Respiratory Therapists.

CONCLUSIONS

TelePR can reach COPD patients with health disparities and can be successfully implemented. The small sample size and large confidence intervals prevent conclusion about the relative effectiveness of participating in TelePR compared to SPR. However, improved outcomes were seen for those in TelePR as well as in SPR. Increasing adoption of PR and TelePR requires consideration of comorbidity burden, and perception of PR utility, and must facilitate medical clearances. Given the sparsity of SPR locations, TelePR can overcome at least the barrier of access. However, given the challenges to the uptake and completion of PR - many of the additional barriers in PR (both in TelePR and SPR) need to be addressed. Awareness of these real-world challenges will not only inform implementation of TelePR for clinicians seeking to adopt this platform but will also inform study designers and reviewers regarding the feasibility of approaches to patient recruitment and retention.

Asthma and its relationship with anthropometric markers among adults

BACKGROUND

Many studies have examined the association between anthropometric indicators and the likelihood of developing asthma. However, no study has yet examined the link between asthma and anthropometric markers of risk. This study addresses this gap in the literature by evaluating the relationship between asthma, smoking, and anthropometric measurements such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) among individuals residing in the United States.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study conducted a secondary analysis of the 2011-2014 National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, using data from 2,257 participants aged 25-74. We classified the participants into four groups based on self-reported smoking and asthma status: nonsmokers with no asthma, asthma alone, smokers only, and smokers with asthma. The outcomes of interest were BMI, WC, HC, and WHR scores in the latter three groups compared to the nonsmokers with no asthma group.

RESULTS

Linear regression analysis showed that those with asthma alone and smokers with asthma were significantly more likely to have a BMI, WC, or HC score of 1 or higher than people without asthma and smokers only.

CONCLUSION

A higher score on the anthropometric parameters was substantially related to participants who had only asthma and those who had both asthma and smoking.

Frailty and rehabilitation outcome in older patients with cardiorespiratory disease: preliminary multidimensional data

Chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are two clinical conditions often associated with cognitive dysfunctions, psychological distress, poor quality of life (QoL), and functional worsening. In addition, since patients suffering from these conditions are often older adults, frailty syndrome represents a further and important issue to be investigated. The present preliminary study aimed to perform a multidimensional assessment of CHF and/or COPD older patients (age ≥65) undergoing cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation. The characteristics of the included patients (30 CHF and 30 COPD) resulted almost similar, except for the COPD patients' longer duration of illness and better performances in Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III subtests and short physical performance battery (SPPB). No significant differences were found in the frailty evaluation, but a consistent number of patients resulted to be frail (CHF=36.7% vs COPD=26.6%). After the rehabilitation program, a significant improvement was found in the whole sample concerning the executive functions (14.34±2.49 vs 15.62±2.22, p=0.001), quality of life (58.77±18.87 vs 65.82±18.45, p=0.003), depressive and anxious symptoms (6.27±4.21 vs 3.77±3.39, p=0.001 and 5.17±3.40 vs 3.38±3.21, p=0.001), frailty status [4.00 (3.00,5.00) vs 3.00 (3.00,5.00) p=0.035] and functional exercise abilities [SPPB, 7.40±3.10 vs 9.51±3.67, p=0.0002; timed up and go test, 14.62±4.90 vs 11.97±4.51, p<0.0001; 6-minute walking test, 353.85±127.62 vs 392.59±123.14, p=0.0002]. Preliminary results showed a substantial homogeneity of CHF and COPD older patients' cognitive, psychosocial, frailty, and functional characteristics. Nevertheless, the specific rehabilitation intervention appears promising in both clinical populations. This trial has been registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05230927 registration number (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05230927).

The effect of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation on 5-year survival in COPD: does maintaining a home exercise program improve survival?

BACKGROUND

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Therefore, optimizing medical therapy in the comprehensive management of the disease, as well as including pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in the treatment, is essential. The goal of our study was to determine the impact of PR on the survival of COPD patients.

METHODS

Between 2007-2015, 509 COPD patients who completed the PR constituted the PR group, while 167 patients who applied but could not complete it after the initial evaluations formed the control group. In the PR group, dyspnea perception, exercise capacity, muscle strength, body composition, quality of life, psychosocial status, and i-BODE scores were assessed at the beginning and end of the program, whereas in the control group, these assessments could only be conducted at the beginning. Also, after PR, our PR participants have prescribed a home exercise program, and they were recalled to the hospital at the 3rd, 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th months for follow-up visits.

RESULTS

A statistically significant improvement was found in almost all the data (except FEV1/FVC, BORG after exercise, and FFMI) after PR. There was a statistically significant difference in 5-year survival in favor of the PR group (p = 0.006), and in PR patients who accompanied the home exercise program vs. those who did not (p = 0.000). Also the gains in MRC (p = 0.003; OR: 2.20; CI: 1.319- 3.682), MEP (p = 0.041; OR: 1.02; CI: 1.001-1.035), and i-BODE (p = 0.006; OR: 0.914; CI: 0.857-0.974) increased the survival.

DISCUSSION

Apart from incorporating PR into treatment in the comprehensive management of COPD, we demonstrated that maintaining a home exercise program for at least two years following PR increased 5-year survival significantly.

Role of pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a historical perspective

Introduction

Pulmonary rehabilitation is known as an effective therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This article is a brief introduction into the history of medical and pulmonary rehabilitation, presenting the evolution of applied therapies and methods from ancient to present times. It also highlights the role of physical effort in the prevention and treatment of lung diseases, with special consideration to COPD.

Methods

For this literature review, the international databases Medline and Scopus were used to identify relevant articles, between January 1981 to December 2021; eighty articles were considered: thirty-six reviews, eight original research and six general articles which met the criteria for inclusion. A total of thirty references were excluded because they were not relevant.

Results

Available published data suggest a rich history of rehabilitation reaching for thousands of years even though it was developed as a medical branch only in the 20th century. Pulmonary rehabilitation is currently an important component of the management of COPD patients, with a positive impact on symptoms, frequency of exacerbations, severity and mortality rates.

Conclusions

Even though this type of intervention is known to be beneficial for this type of patients more studies need to be conducted in this field.

[Take-home messages from the COPD 2021 biennial of the French Society of Respiratory Diseases. Understanding to so as to better innovate]

INTRODUCTION

The first COPD biennial organized by the French Society of Respiratory Diseases (SPLF) took place on 17 December 2021.

STATE OF THE ART

The objective of the biennial was to discuss current knowledge regarding COPD pathophysiology, current treatments, research development, and future therapeutic approaches.

PERSPECTIVES

The different lecturers laid emphasis on the complexity of pathophysiologic mechanisms including bronchial, bronchiolar and parenchymal alterations, and also dwelt on the role of microbiota composition in COPD pathenogenesis. They pointed out that addition to inhaled treatments, ventilatory support and endoscopic approaches have been increasingly optimized. The development of new therapeutic pathways such as biotherapy and cell therapy (stem cells…) call for further exploration.

CONCLUSIONS

The dynamism of COPD research was repeatedly underlined, and needs to be further reinforced, the objective being to "understand so as to better innovate" so as to develop effective new strategies for treatment and management of COPD.

Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Services in Patients with Different Lung Diseases

BACKGROUND

the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) services, beyond research contexts, on patients with lung diseases other than COPD requires further study.

OBJECTIVES

to (i) assess the impact of a publicly funded PR on patients' exercise capacity, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and (ii) explore whether the effects vary across lung diseases.

METHODS

this retrospective pre-post study analyzed data from the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority PR program between 2016 and 2019.

RESULTS

682 patients completed the full PR program. Pooled analyses found significant improvements in the patients' exercise capacity (six-minute walk test (6MWT) (13.6%), fatigue (10.3%), and dyspnea (6.4%)), Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale (SEMCD6) (11.6%), and HRQoL (Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) (18.5%) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (10.9%)). The analyses conducted on sub-groups of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, bronchiectasis, interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), other restrictive lung diseases (e.g., obesity, pleural effusion, etc.), lung cancer, and pulmonary hypertension (PH) indicated that, except for patients with PH, all the patients improved in the 6MWT. Fatigue decreased in patients with COPD, ILDs, and other restrictive lung diseases. Dyspnea decreased in patients with COPD, asthma, and lung cancer. SEMCD6 scores increased in COPD, ILDs and PH patients. CCQ scores decreased in all lung diseases, except lung cancer and PH. SGRQ scores only decreased in patients with COPD.

CONCLUSION

PR services had a significant impact on patients with different lung diseases. Therefore, publicly funded PR should be available as a critical component in the management of patients with these diseases.

Maintenance of pulmonary rehabilitation benefits in patients with COPD: is a structured 5-year follow-up program helpful?

Background/aim

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has proven useful in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but the benefits decrease over time. We evaluated the effects of a structured follow-up program after PR on patient pulmonary function, dyspnea, body composition, exercise capacity, quality of life, psychological status, i-BODE index, hospitalization status, 5-year survival rate. We explored whether this follow-up program could serve as a maintenance program.

Materials and methods

COPD patients who completed PR attended follow-up visits over 5 years. We administered incremental (ISWT), endurance shuttle walk tests (ESWT), measured body (BMI), fat-free mass indices (FFMI), recorded modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), St. George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), anxiety-depression scores. We also noted the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), the forced vital capacity (FVC), the forced midexpiratory flow (FEF25-75), hospitalization, survival rates before, after PR, and in years 1, 2, 3, 5. This was a retrospective observational study.

Results

Thirty-three COPD patients with a mean age of 58 ± 8 years were enrolled. Twenty-seven (82%) were male. The mean FEV1 was 47 ± 16% of the predicted. After PR, the mMRC scale, SGRQ, anxiety, depression scores; i-BODE index; ISWT, ESWT results improved (all p < 0.001), with the improvements persisting through the first year. Patient body composition, pulmonary function did not differ from the baseline over the 5 years (except for a decrease in the FEF25-75 value in year 5; p = 0.003). The hospitalization rate, i-BODE index did not change significantly over the 5 years, the improvements in the ISWT, ESWT outcomes were preserved for 3 years (p = 0.013/0.005, respectively). The quality-of-life, anxiety scores deteriorated in year 1 (both p < 0.001) and year 3 (p = 0.005/0.010, respectively). The dyspnea, depression scores increased progressively over the 5 years.

Conclusion

Structured follow-up programs with visits at 6-month intervals may effectively maintain improvements in COPD. Long-term randomized controlled studies are needed to verify these results.

[Pulmonary rehabilitation, a historical perspective from Hippocrates to tele-rehabilitation]

In ancient times Hippocrates described a disease, the 3rd phthisis, which seems to correspond to COPD and is mainly treated by walking, gradually increasing the number of steps until reaching 10,000 steps a day at the end of the initial period of treatment. The recent era began in the second half of the 20th century and ended in 2015, with an unusual Cochrane Library editorial in which it was stated that the accumulated evidence (statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in clinical signs, tolerance to exercise, quality of life, days hospitalization…) on the effects of rehabilitation programs suffice to suspend research on the subject and to justify focus on new elements in the programs. It is essential, in fact, to establish uniform practical recommendations for the prescription of routine rehabilitation (number and duration of physical activity sessions, therapeutic education, re-training intensity…). In addition, studies should be carried out on new practices: community or home rehabilitation, long-term rehabilitation, tele-rehabilitation.