Acute exacerbation of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: incidence and outcomes

Compatible with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis on high-resolution computed tomography: from the ATS/JRS/ALAT 2020 hypersensitivity pneumonitis guidelines

Background

In compatible with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) of the computed tomography (CT) classification using the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS)/Latin American Thoracic Association (ALAT) HP guidelines, the lung fibrosis pattern was classified as either a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern or a diffuse ground-glass opacity (GGO) pattern with subtle fibrosis. We investigated whether patients with the same imaging classification had different disease progression. We also attempted to reclassify these patients using the CHEST HP guidelines.

Methods

Patients with fibrotic HP who had compatible CT pattern in the ATS/JRS/ALAT classification were investigated retrospectively.

Results

With 62 patients in the UIP pattern group and 25 patients in the diffuse GGO pattern group, 87 patients with fibrotic HP had compatible pattern on CT. Annual forced vital capacity changes in the UIP pattern group and diffuse GGO pattern group were -2.7% and +3.3% (P=0.004), respectively. The 5-year survival rates in the UIP pattern group and diffuse GGO pattern group were 86% and 100% (P=0.02). In UIP pattern group in the ATS/JRS/ALAT classification, 27% patients were classified as typical fibrotic HP pattern in the CHEST guidelines. In the diffuse GGO pattern group, 52% patients were classified as typical pattern of fibrotic HP. In the CHEST guidelines, more patients in the GGO pattern were classified as typical pattern compared with those in the UIP pattern (P=0.02).

Conclusions

The two patterns in compatible with fibrotic HP of CT classification using the ATS/JRS/ALAT HP guidelines had different disease progression. Typical patterns were more frequent in the CHEST guidelines than the ATS/JRS/ALAT guidelines.

Nationwide Study of the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Korea

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a condition with an uncertain global incidence, and information on its diagnosis and management is limited. This study aimed to address these knowledge gaps.

METHODS

This study utilized customized claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) in South Korea from January 2010, to December 2021. Patients with HP were identified based on the diagnosis code (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, J67) between 2011 and 2020. Incident HP cases were defined as new HP claims, excluding those with claims in the previous year. The study examined various factors such as age, sex, comorbidities, diagnostic methods, and treatment patterns. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with treatment initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 8,678 HP incident cases were confirmed, with age- and sex-adjusted annual incidence rates ranging from 1.14/100,000 in 2020 to 2.16/100,000 in 2012. The mean age of patients with incident HP was 52 years, with a higher incidence observed among males. Additionally, the most common comorbidity was asthma. Bronchoscopy was performed on 16.9% of patients, and 25.4% of patients did not receive treatment within 1 year of diagnosis. Among those who received treatment, prednisone was the most used systemic steroid, and azathioprine was the most commonly used second-line immunosuppressant. Factors associated with treatment initiation included the female sex, having asthma or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and undergoing bronchoscopy.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights into the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment patterns of HP in South Korea using nationwide medical claims data.

Prognostic factors of progressive fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a large, retrospective, multicentre, observational cohort study

Background

Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease caused by sensitisation to chronic allergen inhalation. This study aimed to determine prognostic indicators of progression and mortality in fHP.

Methods

This was a retrospective, multicentre, observational, cross-sectional cohort study of consecutive patients diagnosed with fHP from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2021. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals for predictors of progression and survival.

Results

A total of 403 patients were diagnosed with fHP: median (interquartile range) age 66.5 (14.0) years, 51.9% females and 55.1% never-smokers. The cause of fHP was mainly fungal (39.7%) or avian (41.4%). Lung biopsy was performed in 269 cases (66.7%). In the whole cohort the variables that were related to mortality or lung transplant were older age (HR 1.08; p<0.001), percentage predicted forced vital capacity (HR 0.96; p=0.001), lymphocytosis in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (HR 0.93; p=0.001), presence of acute exacerbation during follow-up (HR 3.04; p=0.001) and GAP (gender, age and lung physiology) index (HR 1.96; p<0.01). In the group of biopsied patients, the presence of fibroblastic foci at biopsy (HR 8.39; p<0.001) stands out in multivariate Cox regression analyses as a highly significant predictor for increased mortality or lung transplant. GAP index (HR 1.26; p=0.009), lymphocytosis in BAL (HR 0.97; p=0.018) and age (HR 1.03; p=0.018) are also predictors of progression.

Conclusions

The study identified several prognostic factors for progression and/or survival in fHP. The presence of fibroblastic foci at biopsy was a consistent predictor for increased mortality and the presence of lymphocytosis in BAL was inversely related to mortality.

Diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases: from Averill A. Liebow to artificial intelligence

Histopathologic criteria of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) were defined over the years and endorsed by leading organizations decades after Dr. Averill A. Liebow first coined the term UIP in the 1960s as a distinct pathologic pattern of fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Novel technology and recent research on interstitial lung diseases with genetic component shed light on molecular pathogenesis of UIP/IPF. Two antifibrotic agents introduced in the mid-2010s opened a new era of therapeutic approaches to UIP/IPF, albeit contentious issues regarding their efficacy, side effects, and costs. Recently, the concept of progressive pulmonary fibrosis was introduced to acknowledge additional types of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases with the clinical and pathologic phenotypes comparable to those of UIP/IPF. Likewise, some authors have proposed a paradigm shift by considering UIP as a stand-alone diagnostic entity to encompass other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases that manifest a relentless progression as in IPF. These trends signal a pendulum moving toward the tendency of lumping diagnoses, which poses a risk of obscuring potentially important information crucial to both clinical and research purposes. Recent advances in whole slide imaging for digital pathology and artificial intelligence technology could offer an unprecedented opportunity to enhance histopathologic evaluation of interstitial lung diseases. However, current clinical practice trends of moving away from surgical lung biopsies in interstitial lung disease patients may become a limiting factor in this endeavor as it would be difficult to build a large histopathologic database with correlative clinical data required for artificial intelligence models.

Japanese clinical practice guide 2022 for hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Considering recently published two guidelines for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) has now published its own Japanese clinical practice guide for HP. Major types of HP in Japan include summer-type, home-related, bird-related, farmer's lung, painter's lung, humidifier lung, and mushroom grower's lung. Identifying causative antigens is critical for increasing diagnostic confidence, as well as improving prognosis through appropriate antigen avoidance. This guide proposes a comprehensive antigen questionnaire including the outbreak sources reported in Japan. Drawing on the 2021 CHEST guideline, this guide highlights the antigen identification confidence level and adaptations for environmental surveys. The detection of specific antibodies against causative antigens is an important diagnostic predictor of HP. In Japan, the assessments of bird-specific IgG (pigeons, budgerigars) and the Trichosporon asahii antibody are covered by medical insurance. Although this guide adopts the 2020 ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline diagnostic criteria based on the combination of imaging findings, exposure assessment, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis, and histopathological findings, it added some annotations to facilitate the interpretation of the content and correlate the medical situation in Japan. It recommends checking biomarkers; seasonal changes in the KL-6 concentration (increase in winter for bird-related HP/humidifier lung and in summer for summer-type HP) and high KL-6 concentrations providing a basis for the suspicion of HP. Antigen avoidance is critical for disease management of HP. This guide also addresses the pharmacological management of HP, highlighting the treatment strategy for fibrotic HP including combination therapies with anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive and antifibrotic drugs.

Clinical characteristics of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: non-fibrotic and fibrotic subtypes

BACKGROUND

The presence of fibrosis is a criterion for subtype classification in the newly updated hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) guidelines. The present study aimed to summarize differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis of non-fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (NFHP) and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) and explore factors associated with the presence of fibrosis.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients diagnosed with HP through a multidisciplinary discussion were enrolled. Collected data included demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and radiologic and histopathological features. Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore factors related to the presence of fibrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients with HP were enrolled, including 87 (43.1%) NFHP patients and 115 (56.9%) FHP patients. Patients with FHP were older and more frequently presented with dyspnea, crackles, and digital clubbing than patients with NFHP. Serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 125, carbohydrate antigen 153, gastrin-releasing peptide precursor, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, and antigen cytokeratin 21-1, and count of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) eosinophils were higher in the FHP group than in the NFHP group. BAL lymphocytosis was present in both groups, but less pronounced in the FHP group. Multivariable regression analyses revealed that older age, <20% of lymphocyte in BAL, and ≥1.75% of eosinophil in BAL were risk factors for the development of FHP. Twelve patients developed adverse outcomes, with a median survival time of 12.5 months, all of whom had FHP.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, <20% of lymphocyte in BAL, and ≥1.75% of eosinophil in BAL were risk factors associated with the development of FHP. Prognosis of patients with NFHP was better than that of patients with FHP. These results may provide insights into the mechanisms of fibrosis in HP.

Acute Exacerbation and Proposed Criteria for Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Patients with Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbation (AE) occasionally develops in the course of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare AE of fibrotic HP with that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed fibrotic HP and IPF diagnosed based on a multidisciplinary discussion were included in the analysis. AE in patients with fibrotic HP and IPF was evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

This study included 309 and 160 patients with fibrotic HP and IPF, respectively. Their 50% survival times were 96.1 and 78.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.36-0.77], log-rank test; p < 0.001). Notably, the cumulative AE rates of fibrotic HP were 3% at 1 year and 10% at 3 years. Moreover, the corresponding rates of IPF were 8% at 1 year and 20% at 3 years (HR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.45-0.93], log-rank test; p = 0.034). The 90-day survival rates from the AE onset of fibrotic HP and IPF were 75% and 64%, respectively (HR: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.31-0.83], log-rank test; p = 0.006). The respiratory function test on the physiological criteria of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) was a predictor of AE in fibrotic HP. However, the high-resolution CT (HRCT) changes in the criteria of PPF were not. Nevertheless, both the physiological and radiological criteria of PPF were a predictor of AE of IPF.

CONCLUSION

AE of fibrotic HP has a lesser prognostic effect than that of IPF. HRCT criteria for PPF were not a risk factor for AE in patients with fibrotic HP.

Progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease

Many interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) share mechanisms that result in a progressive fibrosing phenotype. In Brazil, the most common progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILDs) are chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, unclassified ILD, and connective tissue diseases. PF-ILD is seen in approximately 30% of patients with ILD. Because PF-ILD is characterized by disease progression after initiation of appropriate treatment, a diagnosis of the disease resulting in fibrosis is critical. Different criteria have been proposed to define progressive disease, including worsening respiratory symptoms, lung function decline, and radiological evidence of disease progression. Although the time elapsed between diagnosis and progression varies, progression can occur at any time after diagnosis. Several factors indicate an increased risk of progression and death. In the last few years, antifibrotic drugs used in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have been tested in patients with PF-ILD. The effects of nintedanib and placebo have been compared in patients with PF-ILD, a mean difference of 107.0 mL/year being observed, favoring nintedanib. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency have approved the use of nintedanib in such patients on the basis of this finding. Pirfenidone has been evaluated in patients with unclassified ILD and in patients with other ILDs, the results being similar to those for nintedanib. More studies are needed in order to identify markers of increased risk of progression in patients with ILD and determine the likelihood of response to treatment with standard or new drugs.

Re-hospitalisation predicts poor prognosis after acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Several markers have been identified to increase the risk for acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) or mortality related to AE-ILD. However, less is known about the risk predictors of ILD patients who have survived AE. The aim of the study was to characterise AE-ILD survivors and investigate prognostic factors in this subpopulation.

METHODS

All AE-ILD patients (n = 95) who had been discharged alive from two hospitals located in Northern Finland were selected from a population of 128 AE-ILD patients. Clinical data related to the hospital treatment and six-month follow-up visit were collected retrospectively from medical records.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and 42 patients with other ILD were identified. Two thirds of the patients had been treated without invasive or non-invasive ventilation support. The clinical features of six-month survivors (n = 65) and non-survivors (n = 30) did not differ in terms of medical treatment or oxygen requirements. Of the patients, 82.5% used corticosteroids at the six-month follow-up visit. Fifty-two patients experienced at least one non-elective respiratory re-hospitalisation before the six-month follow-up visit. In a univariate model, IPF diagnosis, high age and a non-elective respiratory re-hospitalisation increased the risk of death, although re-hospitalisation was the only independent risk factor in a multivariate model. In six-month survivors, there was no statistically significant decrease in pulmonary function test results (PFT) examined at the follow-up visit compared with earlier PFT examined near the time of AE-ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

The AE-ILD survivors were a heterogeneous group of patients both clinically and in terms of their outcome. A non-elective respiratory re-hospitalisation was identified as a marker of poor prognosis among AE-ILD survivors.

Usual interstitial pneumonia as a stand-alone diagnostic entity: the case for a paradigm shift?

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is characterised by a distinctive morphological and radiological appearance that was considered the pathognomonic hallmark of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, this peculiar lung remodelling pattern is also seen in other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases, including hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and connective tissue diseases. In this Personal View, we advocate the designation of a UIP pattern as a single, discrete diagnostic entity, amalgamating its primary form and secondary processes in disorders such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis (hypersensitivity pneumonitis with UIP), rheumatoid arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis with UIP), and others. The current separation between primary and secondary UIP is in keeping with the view that every individual interstitial lung disease must be viewed as a separate entity but does not reflect striking similarities between primary and secondary UIP in the morphological or radiological appearance, clinical behaviour, pathogenic pathways, and the efficacy of anti-fibrotic therapy. We believe that the unification of UIP as a single diagnostic entity has undeniable advantages.

Fibrosis score predicts mortality in patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Background

Variable clinical courses make it challenging to predict mortality resulting from fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). This study evaluated the usefulness of radiologic parameters for predicting mortality in patients with fibrotic HP.

Methods

Clinical data and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images, which were scored for reticulation, honeycombing, ground glass opacity (GGO), consolidation, and mosaic attenuation (MA) by visual assessment, were retrospectively analyzed in a total of 101 patients with fibrotic HP (all biopsy-proven cases). Fibrosis score was defined as the sum of reticulation and honeycombing scores.

Results

The mean age of the 101 patients was 58.9 years, and 60.4% were females. During the follow-up (median: 55.5 months; interquartile range: 37.7-89.0 months), the 1-, 3-and 5-year mortality rates were 3.9, 16.8, and 32.7%, respectively. The non-survivors were older and had significantly lower lung function and minimum oxygen saturation during the 6-min walk test than the survivors. The non-survivors had higher scores of reticulation, honeycombing, GGO, fibrosis, and MA on HRCT than survivors. In the multivariable Cox analysis, reticulation, GGO, and fibrosis scores were independent prognostic factors for mortality in patients with fibrotic HP, as well as age. Fibrosis score showed great performance for predicting the 5-year mortality (AUC = 0.752, p < 0.001) and higher mortality was recorded for patients with high fibrosis score (≥12.0%) (the mean survival time: 58.3 vs. 146.7 months, p < 0.01) than those without.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that radiologic fibrosis score may be a useful predictor of mortality in patients with fibrotic HP.

Impact of antigen avoidance test for fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in stable phase

BACKGROUND

The antigen avoidance has been used in the diagnosis and treatment of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP); however, its usefulness in stable fibrotic HP is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the usefulness of the antigen avoidance test in patients with fibrotic HP in stable phase.

METHODS

The antigen avoidance test was conducted during a 2-week hospitalization comparing clinical parameters at admission and before discharge. A retrospective review of patients who underwent surgical lung biopsy or transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, who were diagnosed with fibrotic HP by multi-disciplinary discussion, and whose disease progression was stable for more than two months before the antigen avoidance test was done.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2021, 40 patients met the criteria, and 17 (43%) patients had a positive antigen avoidance test. The patients with positive in the antigen avoidance test had significantly greater annual forced vital capacity (FVC) decline than those with negative before the test (- 6.5% vs. - 0.3%, p = 0.045). The patients with positive antigen avoidance test had less annual FVC decline than those with negative in the year following the test (0.8% vs. - 5.0%, p = 0.048). The differences in annual improvement were found for serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 between the positive and negative patients in the year following the test (- 27% vs. - 5%, p = 0.049). In multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis, a negative result of the antigen avoidance test was a risk factor for death or acute exacerbation of fibrotic HP (HR = 0.26 [95% CI: 0.07-0.90], p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

In fibrotic HP patients in stable phase, the antigen avoidance test under a 2-week hospitalization was valuable in predicting prognosis.

Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: A Practical Review of Current Approaches

Recent advances in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis include improved diagnostic guidance, systematic assessments of immunosuppressive therapy, and the recent availability of antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib) for those with progressive disease. A standardized approach to diagnosis may lead to better inclusion criteria for future therapeutic protocols and delineation of disease or treatment response predictors for real-world management. This review will highlight current diagnostic and treatment challenges and remaining knowledge gaps or areas of uncertainty, with a practical overview of supporting evidence and its clinical implications. Exposure history, serologic testing for antigen sensitivity, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis, histopathology, and radiologic findings will be covered in the diagnosis section, with immunosuppression, antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, and disease prognosis in the treatment and management section.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: Current concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease caused by an aberrant response to an inhaled exposure, which results in mostly T cell-mediated inflammation, granuloma formation, and fibrosis in some cases. HP is diagnosed by exposure identification, HRCT findings of ground-glass opacities, centrilobular nodules, and mosaic attenuation, with traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing in fibrotic cases. Additional testing including serum IgG testing for the presence of antigen exposure, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis, and lung biopsy demonstrating granulomas, inflammation, and fibrosis, increases the diagnostic confidence. Treatment for HP includes avoidance of the implicated exposure, immunosuppression, and anti-fibrotic therapy in select cases. This narrative review presents the recent literature in the understanding of the immunopathological mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of HP.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is one of the most common interstitial lung diseases (ILD), that presents unique challenges for a confident diagnosis and limited therapeutic options. The disease is triggered by exposure to a wide variety of inciting antigens in susceptible individuals which results in T-cell hyperactivation and bronchioloalveolar inflammation. However, the genetic risk and the pathogenic mechanisms remain incompletely elucidated. Revised diagnostic criteria have recently been proposed, recommending to classify the disease in fibrotic and non-fibrotic HP which has strong therapeutic and outcome consequences. Confident diagnosis depends on the presence of clinical features of ILD, identification of the antigen(s), typical images on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), characteristic histopathological features, and lymphocytosis in the bronchoalveolar lavage. However, identifying the source of antigen is usually challenging, and HRCT and histopathology are often heterogeneous and not typical, supporting the notion that diagnosis should include a multidisciplinary assessment. Antigen removal and treating the inflammatory process is crucial in the progression of the disease since chronic persistent inflammation seems to be one of the mechanisms leading to lung fibrotic remodeling. Fibrotic HP has a few therapeutic options but evidence of efficacy is still scanty. Deciphering the molecular pathobiology of HP will contribute to open new therapeutic avenues and will provide vital insights in the search for novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.