Long-term effectiveness of benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma patients treated for 96-weeks: data from the ANANKE study

Titration of anti-IL-5 biologics in severe asthma: an open-label randomised controlled trial (the OPTIMAL study)

BACKGROUND

Anti-interleukin (IL)-5 biologics effectively reduce exacerbations and the need for maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS) in severe eosinophilic asthma. However, it is unknown how long anti-IL-5 treatment should be continued. Data from clinical trials indicate a gradual but variable loss of control after treatment cessation. In this pilot study of titration, we evaluated a dose-titration algorithm in patients who had achieved clinical control on an anti-IL-5 biologic.

METHODS

In this open-label randomised controlled trial conducted over 52 weeks, patients with clinical control (no exacerbations or mOCS) on anti-IL-5 treatment were randomised to continue with unchanged intervals or have dosing intervals adjusted according to a titration algorithm that gradually extended dosing intervals and reduced them again at signs of loss of disease control. The OPTIMAL algorithm was designed to down-titrate dosing until signs of loss of control, to enable assessment of the longest dosing interval possible.

RESULTS

Among 73 patients enrolled, 37 patients were randomised to the OPTIMAL titration arm; 78% of patients tolerated down-titration of treatment. Compared to the control arm, the OPTIMAL arm tended to have more exacerbations during the study (32% versus 17%; p=0.13). There were no severe adverse events related to titration, and lung function and symptoms scores remained stable and comparable in both study arms throughout.

CONCLUSION

This study serves as a proof of concept for titration of anti-IL-5 biologics in patients with severe asthma with clinical control on treatment, and the OPTIMAL algorithm provides a potential framework for individualising dosing intervals in the future.

Overcoming Barriers to Remission in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Two-Year Real-World Data With Benralizumab

BACKGROUND

Benralizumab has been reported to lead to clinical remission of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) at 1 year in some patients. However, whether this is maintained over a longer term remains unclear. Additionally, the impact of pulmonary and extrapulmonary comorbidities on the ability to meet remission is poorly understood.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes including remission of SEA with benralizumab at 1 and 2 years were assessed retrospectively in a real-world UK multi-centre severe asthma cohort. The presence of clinically relevant pulmonary and extrapulmonary comorbidities associated with respiratory symptoms was recorded. Analyses to identify factors associated with the ability to meet remission were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 276 patients with SEA treated with benralizumab including 113 patients who had switched from a previous biologic to benralizumab were included. Overall, clinical remission was met in 17% (n = 31/186) and 32% (n = 43/133) of patients at 1 and 2 years, respectively. This increased to 28% at 1 year and 49% at 2 years once patients with pulmonary and/or extrapulmonary comorbidities were excluded. Body mass index (BMI) and maintenance OCS (mOCS) use demonstrated a negative association with clinical remission at 1 (BMI: OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96, p < 0.01; mOCS: OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.99, p < 0.05) and 2 years (BMI: OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.87-0.99, p < 0.05; mOCS: OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.89-0.99, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this long-term, real-world study, patients with SEA demonstrated the ability to meet and sustain clinical remission when treated with benralizumab. The presence of comorbidities including obesity, which are known to be independently associated with respiratory symptoms, reduced the likelihood of meeting clinical remission.

SANI clinical remission definition: a useful tool in severe asthma management

In the field of severe asthma, the concept of disease control has recently been integrated by the one of clinical remission. With this new concept, we move on to analyze the efficacy of therapy on multiple parameters simultaneously, starting with the mandatory discontinuation of the systemic glucocorticoids, to which is added the effect on exacerbations, respiratory function, and symptoms control. The Italian severe asthma registry SANI (Severe Asthma Network Italy) drafted criteria for the definition of disease remission, allowing patients to be classified into two groups, partial and complete remission. The greater dynamism of the definition, provided by SANI, allows us to hypothesize its practical use, concerning therapy management of severe asthma patients, starting from the level of remission, with the aim to facilitate the clinical decision on replacement, continuation or modulation of patients' therapy.

Unlocking the Long-Term Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Three-Year Real-Life Study

Background: Benralizumab has been shown to restore good control of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). Robust data on benralizumab effectiveness over periods longer than 2 years are scarce. Methods: This retrospective multicentric study was conducted on 108 Italian SEA patients treated with benralizumab for up to 36 months. Partial and complete clinical remission (CR) were assessed. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics or using linear, logistic, and negative binomial mixed-effect regression models. Results: At 36 months, benralizumab reduced the exacerbation rate by 89% and increased the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (+440 mL at 36 months, p < 0.0001). Benralizumab improved asthma control as well as sinonasal symptoms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Up to 93.33% of patients either reduced or discontinued OCS; benralizumab also decreased ICS use and other asthma medications. Overall, 84.31% of patients achieved partial or complete CR. Conclusions: Benralizumab improved asthma and sinonasal outcomes up to 36 months. These findings support the potential of benralizumab to induce CR, emphasizing its role as a disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drug for the management of SEA. Further research is warranted to expand these findings by minimizing data loss and assessing benralizumab's long-term safety.

Sustained Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Naïve and Biologics-Experienced Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients: Results from the ANANKE Study

Purpose

Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients often present overlapping inflammatory features rendering them eligible for multiple biologic therapies; switching biologic treatment is a strategy adopted to optimize asthma control when patients show partial or no response to previous biologics.

Patients and Methods

ANANKE is a retrospective, multicenter Italian study (NCT04272463). Here, we outline the characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes in naïve-to-biologics and biologics-experienced patients treated with benralizumab for up to 96 weeks. Bio-experienced patients were split into omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets according to the type of biologic previously used.

Results

A total of 124 (76.5%) naïve and 38 (23.5%) bio-experienced patients were evaluated at index date; 13 patients (34.2%) switched from mepolizumab, 21 patients (55.3%) switched from omalizumab, and four patients (10.5%) received both biologics. The mepolizumab subset was characterized by the longest SEA duration (median of 4.6 years), the highest prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) (76.5%), and the greatest oral corticosteroid (OCS) daily dosage (median of 25 mg prednisone equivalent). The omalizumab group showed the highest severe annual exacerbation rate (AER) (1.70). At 96 weeks, treatment with benralizumab reduced any and severe AER by more than 87% and 94%, respectively, across all groups. Lung function was overall preserved, with major improvements observed in the mepolizumab group, which also revealed a 100% drop of the median OCS dose. Asthma Control Test (ACT) score improved in the naïve group while its increment was more variable in bio-experienced patients; among these, a marked difference was noticed between omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets (median ACT score of 23.5 and 18, respectively).

Conclusion

Benralizumab promotes durable and profound clinical benefits in naïve and bio-experienced groups, indicating that a nearly complete depletion of eosinophils is highly beneficial in the control of SEA, independently of previous biologic use.

Difficult-To-Treat and Severe Asthma: Can Real-World Studies On Effectiveness of Biological Treatments Change the Lives of Patients?

Many different phenotypes that characterize severe asthma are supported by intricate pathomechanisms called endotypes. The latter are driven by molecular interactions, mediated by intercellular networks. With regard to the biological treatments of either allergic or non-allergic eosinophilic type 2 asthma, real-world studies have confirmed the positive effects of currently available antibodies directed against immunoglobulins E (IgE), interleukin-5 (IL-5) and its receptor, as well as the receptors of interleukins-4 (IL-4) and 13 (IL-13). The best way to treat severe asthma should be chosen based on the peculiar phenotypic and endotypic traits of each patient. This will lead to relevant improvements in both clinical and functional outcomes. In particular, biological therapies can change the lives of asthma patients with a strong impact on quality of life. Unfortunately, patients with severe non-type-2 asthma, who continue to have pertinent unmet needs, are not receiving satisfactory advances within the context of biological treatments. It is also hopeful that in the next future new therapeutic strategies will be specifically implemented for these people, perhaps offering them the opportunity to improve their current, mostly inadequate asthma management.

Eosinophilic Patterns in Patients with Seasonal Allergy Affected by Bronchial Asthma and Rhinitis/Rhinosinusitis: Efficacy of Benralizumab in Patients with the Persistent Pattern

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilia can be influenced by multiple factors. This study aims to set a protocol for monitoring blood absolute eosinophil count (AEC) in patients with seasonal allergy affected by bronchial asthma (BA), allergic rhinitis (AR), or chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis (CRSw/sNP).

METHODS

We planned a total of four annual blood samples to measure AEC in- and out-seasonal pollen exposure (i.e., one measurement every three months for one year).

RESULTS

We identified two distinct groups of patients (non-eosinophilic and eosinophilic). Patients in the eosinophilic group presented with four different patterns (episodic, transient, floating, and persistent). Most patients with episodic, transient, and floating patterns were affected by mild allergy and the increase in eosinophils was related to allergen exposure. In contrast, patients with the persistent pattern mostly presented with more severe allergy (i.e., severe BA and relapsing CRSwNP) and the eosinophilia was unrelated to allergen exposure. The subgroup of patients with severe BA, relapsing CRSwNP, and persistent eosinophilc pattern were treated with benralizumab, which induced a noteworthy improvement in both severe BA and CRSwNP.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple AEC measurements in patients with seasonal allergy can better reflect patient's eosinophilic status and help define the relationship of AEC enhancement with allergen exposure.

The effect of anti-IL5 monoclonal antibodies on regulatory and effector T cells in severe eosinophilic asthma

INTRODUCTION

Biological treatments have redesigned the clinical management of severe eosinophilic asthmatic (SA) patients. Despite emerging evidence supporting the role of natural Killer (NK), and T regulatory cells (Treg) in the pathogenesis of asthma, no data is available on the effects of anti-IL5/IL5R therapies on these cell subsets.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled fourteen SA patients treated with benralizumab (n = 7) or mepolizumab (n = 7) and compared them with healthy controls (HC) (n = 11) and mild to moderate asthmatic (MM) patients (n = 9). Clinical parameters were collected at baseline (T0) and during follow-up. Cellular analysis, including the analysis of T/NK cell subsets, was determined through multicolor flow cytometry.

RESULTS

At T0, SA patients showed higher percentages of CD4 TEM (33.3 ± 17.9 HC, 42.6 ± 16.6 MM and 66.1 ± 19.7 in SA; p < 0.0001) than HC and MM patients. With different timing, the two drugs induce a reduction of CD4 TEM ( 76 ± 19 T0; 43 ± 14 T1; 45 ± 23 T6; 62 ± 18 at T24; p < 0.0001 for mepolizumab and 55 ± 21 T0; 55 ± 22 T1; 43 ± 14 T6; 27 ± 12 at T24; p < 0.0001 for benralizumab) and an increase of Treg cells (1.2 ± 1.3 T0; 5.1 ± 2.5 T1; 6.3 ± 3.4 T6; 8.4 ± 4.6 at T24; p < 0.0001 for mepolizumab and 3.4 ± 1.7 T0; 1.9 ± 0.8 T1; 1.9 ± 1 T6; 5.1 ± 2.4 at T24; p < 0.0001 for benralizumab). The change of CD56dim PD-1+ significantly correlated with FEV1% (r = - 0.32; p < 0.01), while Treg expressing PD-1 correlates with the use of oral steroids ( r = 0.36 p = 0.0008) and ACT score (r = 0.36 p = 0.0008) p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Beyond the clinical improvement, anti-IL-5 treatment induces a rebalancing of Treg and T effector cells in patients with SA.