A comparison of the efficacy of antiangiogenic agents combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with S‑1 as a third‑ or later‑line treatment for advanced non‑small cell lung cancer in China: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Anlotinib is presently used as a third-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is not yet reported whether combining anlotinib with S-1 as a third- or later-line treatment offers superior outcomes compared with anlotinib alone. The present meta-analysis aimed to address this question by systematically searching the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CMB and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for eligible studies published from the establishment of the database to January 10, 2024. Primary outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and the incidence of adverse effects, which were presented as hazard ratios and 95% CIs. The present analysis included 5 retrospective studies with a total of 317 patients and compared the outcomes of patients treated with a combination of anlotinib and S-1 (experimental group) compared with anlotinib alone (control group). The combination treatment significantly improved PFS, OS, ORR and DCR in the experimental group compared with the control group. Bone marrow suppression and fatigue were significantly higher in the experimental group compared with the control group. However, incidences of hypertension, proteinuria, gastrointestinal adverse reactions, hepatic and renal insufficiency and functional hand-foot syndrome were higher in the control group compared with the experimental group, but there was no statistical significance. In summary, combining anlotinib with S-1 may be more effective compared with anlotinib alone for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Despite the higher incidence of adverse reactions with the combination therapy, these reactions could be considered manageable and controllable.

Clinical efficacy of Endostar continuous infusion combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using Endostar continuous infusion for treating oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Method

A total of 62 patients with oesophageal carcinoma were divided into three groups: the Endostar continuous infusion group (n = 27), the Endostar intravenous drip group (n = 21) and the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (n = 14). All patients underwent oesophageal radiotherapy (56-60 Gy) alongside concurrent chemotherapy (4 mg of raltitrexed +100 mg of oxaliplatin, two cycles). In the Endostar continuous infusion group, 210 mg of Endostar was administered via infusion once every 3 weeks for 72 h, repeated for two cycles. The Endostar intravenous drip group received a dosage of 15 mg/day of Endostar, administered once daily for 14 days, repeated for two cycles. The objective response rate (ORR) (complete remission + partial remission), progression-free survival (PFS), 2-year overall survival (2y-OS) and adverse reactions were observed.

Results

In the Endostar continuous infusion, intravenous drip and concurrent chemoradiotherapy groups, the ORR was 100, 95.2 and 78.6%, respectively (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the continuous infusion and concurrent chemoradiotherapy groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the continuous infusion and intravenous drip groups or the intravenous drip and concurrent chemoradiotherapy groups (p > 0.05). The continuous infusion and intravenous drip groups had higher PFS rates than the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (p < 0.05). Regarding the 2y-OS rate, no statistically significant difference was observed among the three groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in adverse reactions among the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Concurrent chemotherapy based on endostatin is effective and safe in the treatment of OSCC. Continuous 3-day Endostar infusion treatment can significantly enhance both short-and long-term therapy efficacy in patients while maintaining a high level of safety.

Efficacy of intestinal microorganisms on immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer

While the 5-year survival rate of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has seen some improvement, the majority of NSCLC patients fail to respond to immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). It is critical to identify effective biomarkers that can enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. The clinical data in the current study were collected from NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, and two groups were classified according to treatment effect: good group with consistent efficacy, poor group with only progressiveness. Differences in intestinal microbiota between the two groups were analyzed using 16s rRNA sequencing. Beta diversity analysis indicated differences between the two groups that were available for differentiation. Comparison of the number of common or unique operational taxonomic units (OTUs) among different groups suggested that there were 53 unique OTUs in the good group and 51 unique OTUs in the poor group. At the phylum level, there was a difference between the two groups for several bacterial groups with the highest abundance values, among which Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Fusobacteria were more abundant in the good group. Members of the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus were abundant in the good group, while the abundance of Bacteroides was low. Biomarkers in the poor group included Bacteroides, Bacteroidetes, Bacteroidia, Bacteroidales, Bacteroidaceae and Veillonellaceae. The intestinal microbiota composition affected the immunotherapy process for NSCLC, which might offer more rational instructions for the clinical application of ICIs in NSCLC patients.

Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Bevacizumab in Combination with Pembrolizumab on Cellular Immune Function in the Treatment of Driver Gene-Negative Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma

Purpose. To explore the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with PD-1 immune drug pembrolizumab on cellular immune function in the treatment of driver gene-negative stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and its short-term survival effect. Methods. From February 2020 to December 2021, 85 patients with driver gene-negative stage IV lung adenocarcinoma were admitted to our hospital and treated with first-line therapy, and their clinical records were reviewed retrospectively. According to the treatments, the patients were separated into two groups the combination group (n = 45) and the control group (n = 40). The treatment regimen of the control group was an AP chemotherapy regimen (pemetrexed combined with cisplatin) + PD-1 immune drug pembrolizumab. The treatment regimen of the combination group was AP chemotherapy regimen + PD-1 immune drug pembrolizumab combined with bevacizumab. We evaluated the pre- and post-treatment cellular immunological function of the two patient groups and discussed the difference between them. Results. There was a substantial difference in the overall effective rate and the disease control rate between the two groups, with the former being 27.50% compared to 48.89% and the latter being 72.50% compared to 93.33% among these 85 patients studied. The KPS for the combination group improved and stayed at 91.11% after treatment, which is considerably better than the KPS for the control group, which was 42.50% (χ2 = 23.09, $P<0.05$ ). There was no significant difference ( $P>0.05$ ) in the numbers of CD3+, CD4+, CD19+, CD8+, or CD4+/CD8+ cells pretreatment between the two groups, but after treatment, the combination group had significantly higher numbers of all these cells. Neither the CD8+ nor the CD19+ level was significantly different between the control and combination groups ( $P>0.05$ ). Furthermore, the incidence of common clinical side effects was similar between the two groups ( $P>0.05$ ). Proteinuria, tiredness, increased alanine aminotransferase, hypertension, immunological pneumonia, muscle pain, arthralgia, hypothyroidism, etc. were the most common side effects reported among both groups throughout therapy. A grade IV side effect is rare. After follow-up until March 2022, the median PFS for the control group was 9.00 ± 1.65 months (95% CI, 5.76–12.24) and the mean PFS was 11.48 ± 0.91 months (95% CI, 9.69–13.26). Comparison of the median PFS of the combination group (13.00 ± 1.10) months (95% CI: 10.84–15.16) with the average PFS of the group (15.52 ± 0.88) months (95% CI = 13.79–17.25) reveals a statistically significant difference ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. Combining bevacizumab with the PD-1 immune medication pembrolizumab to treat patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma improves the quality of life, short-term therapeutic effectiveness, immune function, and PFS.

Platelet-Vesicles-Encapsulated RSL-3 Enable Anti-Angiogenesis and Induce Ferroptosis to Inhibit Pancreatic Cancer Progress

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most malignant cancers. It is characterized by stromal richness, lack of blood supply and special metabolic reprogramming in the tumor microenvironment, which is difficult to treat and easy to metastase. Great efforts have been made to develop new drugs which can pass through the stroma and are more effective than traditional chemotherapeutics, such as ferroptosis inducers-Erastin and RSL-3. As current anti-angiogenic therapy drugs alone are suboptimal for PDAC, novel vascular disruption agents in combination with ferroptosis inducers might provide a possible solution. Here, we designed human platelet vesicles (PVs) to camouflage RSL-3 to enhance drug uptake rate by tumor cells and circulation time in vivo, deteriorating the tumor vessels and resulting in tumor embolism to cut the nutrient supply as well as causing cell death due to excessive lipid peroxidation. The RSL-3@PVs can also cause the classic ferroptosis-related change of mitochondrial morphology, with changes in cellular redox levels. Besides that, RSL-3@PVs has been proved to have great biological safety profile in vitro and in vivo. This study demonstrates the promising potential of integrating PVs and RSL-3 as a combination therapy for improving the outcome of PDAC.