Defining type 2 asthma and patients eligible for dupilumab in Italy: a biomarker-based analysis

Cost-effectiveness analysis of dupilumab among patients with uncontrolled severe asthma using LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST Korean data

BACKGROUND

A sub-analysis of the Korean population in the LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST trial (NCT02414854) revealed that dupilumab effectively treated severe uncontrolled asthma. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of add-on therapy with dupilumab to background therapy in patients ≥ 12 years of age with uncontrolled severe asthma compared to that of background therapy in South Korea.

METHODS

The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a Markov model over a lifetime from the Korean healthcare system perspective. Clinical efficacy and utility weights were obtained from post-hoc analyses of the Korean population in the QUEST trial. Data on the costs and treatment setting of exacerbation in a real-world setting were retrospectively collected using the administrative medical database from a single tertiary hospital.

RESULTS

The base-case results indicated that add-on dupilumab therapy increases costs ($112,924 for add-on dupilumab versus $29,545 for background therapy alone). However, add-on dupilumab increased quality-adjusted life years (QALYs, 8.03 versus 3.93, respectively), with fewer events of severe exacerbations per patient compared to using the background therapy alone (17.920 versus 19.911, respectively). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $20,325 per QALY. Various sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the base-case results. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of add-on dupilumab being cost-effective was 87% at a threshold willingness-to-pay of $26,718 (KRW 35 million) per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab is cost-effective for adolescents and adults with uncontrolled severe asthma in South Korea. Our study provides evidence to support clinicians and policymakers in making informed decisions for severe asthma management.

Type 2 asthma paediatric patients eligible for dupilumab: An Italian biomarker-based analysis

Background

Type 2 inflammation is the principal determinant of asthma in children, and it leads to the downstream activation of eosinophils (EOS), the production of immunoglobulin-E (IgE), and increased levels of fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Dupilumab received the approval for the treatment of uncontrolled severe Type 2 asthma in children.

Objective

The aim of this analysis was to calculate the Type 2 severe asthma paediatric population who would be eligible for treatment with dupilumab in Italy and characterize them by expected biomarker status.

Methods

The calculation of the dupilumab-eligible population employed a two-phase approach: 1) estimating the total number of children aged 6-11 years with uncontrolled severe asthma; and 2) stratifying the severe uncontrolled asthma population, based on appropriate biomarker levels, thus identifying patients eligible for treatment with dupilumab. The VOYAGE study provided the data for this analysis.

Results

The two-phase approach utilizing VOYAGE data revealed that the average number of paediatric patients with uncontrolled severe asthma was N = 1007. Stratification of these patients, as per VOYAGE data, indicated that the majority (N = 740; 73.5%) would have ≥2 elevated biomarkers, and over one-third patients (N = 434, 43.1%) would exhibit simultaneously elevated levels of EOS, FeNO and IgE. Of the paediatric patients, N = 864 were identified as eligible to dupilumab treatment, constituting 85.8% of the target population. Notably, nearly half eligible patients (N = 454) displayed elevated levels of both EOS and FeNO biomarkers, while the substantial majority (81.1%) exhibited at least an increase of EOS levels (N = 817). Patients with increased FeNO levels without a concurrent increase in EOS were less frequent (N = 47; 5.4% of the eligible population).

Conclusion

The simultaneous testing of multiple biomarkers during baseline patient assessment and disease follow-up is highly recommended. Utilizing cost-effective tests, physicians can estimate the prevalence of severe Type 2 asthma, categorize patients into distinct phenotypes (eosinophilic, allergic, or mixed), and consequently identify and prescribe the most suitable therapeutic interventions. This approach also facilitates the ongoing evaluation and adjustment of the treatment strategies based on individual patient responses.

Blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide are prognostic and predictive biomarkers in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND

Blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) are prognostic biomarkers for exacerbations and predict lung function responses to dupilumab in adolescents and adults with asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the relationship between baseline blood eosinophils and Feno and response to dupilumab in children with asthma.

METHODS

Children aged 6 to 11 years with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma (n = 408) were randomized to receive dupilumab 100/200 mg by body weight or volume-matched placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. Annualized exacerbation rate (AER) reduction and least squares mean change in prebronchodilator percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) at week 12 were assessed according to cutoff baseline levels for Feno (<20 ppb vs ≥20 ppb) and blood eosinophil count (<150, ≥150 to <300, ≥300 to <500, and ≥500 cells/μL). Quadrant analyses in populations defined by biomarker thresholds and spline models across continuous end points assessed the relationship with Feno and eosinophil count. Interaction testing evaluated the independent roles of Feno and blood eosinophils as predictive markers.

RESULTS

Exacerbation risk and magnitude of AER reduction increased in subgroups with higher baseline biomarker levels. Quadrant analyses revealed that disease of patients with either elevated Feno or eosinophil counts demonstrated a clinical response to dupilumab. Interaction testing indicated blood eosinophil counts or Feno independently added value as predictive biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma, blood eosinophil counts and Feno are clinically relevant biomarkers to identify those at risk for asthma exacerbations, as well as those with disease with clinical response to dupilumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Liberty Asthma VOYAGE ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02948959.

Association between allergic conditions and COVID-19 susceptibility and outcomes

BACKGROUND

The relationship between underlying type 2 inflammation and immune response to COVID-19 is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationships between allergic conditions and COVID-19 susceptibility and outcomes.

METHODS

In the Optum database, adult patients with and without major allergic conditions (asthma, atopic dermatitis [AD], allergic rhinitis, food allergy, anaphylaxis, or eosinophilic esophagitis) and patients with and without severe asthma/AD were identified. Adjusted incidence rate ratios for COVID-19 were compared among patients with vs without allergic conditions or severe asthma/AD vs non-severe asthma/AD during April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. Among patients with COVID-19, adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization/all-cause mortality were estimated for the same comparisons during April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022.

RESULTS

Patients with (N = 1,273,231; asthma, 47.2%; AD, 1.5%; allergic rhinitis, 58.6%; food allergy, 5.1%; anaphylaxis, 4.1%; eosinophilic esophagitis, 0.9%) and without allergic conditions (N = 2,278,571) were identified. Allergic conditions (adjusted incidence rate ratios [95% CI], 1.22 [1.21-1.24]) and asthma severity (1.12 [1.09-1.15]) were associated with increased incidence of COVID-19. Among patients with COVID-19 (patients with [N = 261,076] and without allergic conditions [N = 1,098,135] were matched on age, sex, region, index month), having an allergic condition had minimal impact on 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization/all-cause mortality (aHR [95% CI] 0.96 [0.95-0.98]) but was associated with a lower risk of mortality (0.80 [0.78-0.83]). Asthma was associated with a higher risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization/all-cause mortality vs non-asthma allergic conditions (aHR [95% CI], 1.27 [1.25-1.30]), mostly driven by higher hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Allergic conditions were associated with an increased risk of receiving COVID-19 diagnosis but reduced mortality after infection.

The Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)- test as add-on test in the diagnostic work-up of asthma: a study protocol

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the lower airways, bronchial hyperactivity, and (reversible) airway obstruction. The Global Initiative of Asthma Guideline recommends a flowchart to diagnose asthma with first-step spirometry with reversibility and a bronchial challenge test (BPT) with histamine or methacholine as a second step [1]. The BPT is considered burdensome, time-consuming for patients and staff, can cause side effects, and is expensive. In addition, this test strongly encumbers lung function capacity. Elevated Nitric Oxide (NO) is associated with airway eosinophilic inflammation in asthma patients and can be measured in exhaled air with the Fractional exhaled (Fe) NO-test. This low-burden FeNO-test could be used as an 'add-on' test in asthma diagnostics [2, 3].

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multi-center prospective study (Trial number: NCT06230458) compares the 'standard asthma diagnostic work-up' (spirometry with reversibility and BPT) to the 'new asthma diagnostics work-up' (FeNO-test as an intermediate step between the spirometry with reversibility and the BPT), intending to determine the impact of the FeNO-based strategy, in terms of the number of avoided BPTs, cost-effectiveness and reduced burden to the patient and health care. The cost reduction of incorporating the FeNO-test in the new diagnostic algorithm will be established by the number of theoretically avoided BPT. The decrease in burden will be studied by calculating differences in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) -score and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) -score after the BPT and FeNO-test with an independent T-test. The accuracy of the FeNO-test will be calculated by comparing the FeNO-test outcomes to the (gold standard) BPTs outcomes in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The intention is to include 171 patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The local medical ethics committee approved the proposed study and is considered a low-burden and risk-low study. The local medical ethics committee registration number: R23.005.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

Strengths: This is the first study that investigates the value of the FeNO-test (cut off ≥ 50 ppb) as an add-on test, to determine the impact of the FeNO-based strategy, in terms of the number of avoided BPTs, cost-effectiveness, and reduced burden on the patient and health care.

LIMITATIONS

High FeNO levels may also be observed in other diseases such as eosinophilic chronic bronchitis and allergic rhinitis. The FeNO-test can be used to rule in a diagnosis of asthma with confidence, however, due to the poor sensitivity it is not suitable to rule out asthma.

Burden of Uncontrolled Severe Asthma With and Without Elevated Type-2 Inflammatory Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Many patients with asthma have type-2 airway inflammation, identified by the presence of biomarkers, including history of allergy, high blood eosinophil (EOS) count, and high fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels.

OBJECTIVE

To assess disease burden in relation to type-2 inflammatory biomarker status (history of allergy, blood EOS count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide level) in patients with uncontrolled and controlled severe asthma in the NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY (NOVELTY) (NCT02760329).

METHODS

Asthma diagnosis and severity were physician-reported. Control was defined using Asthma Control Test score (uncontrolled <20, controlled ≥20) and/or 1 or more severe physician-reported exacerbation in the previous year. Biomarker distribution (history of allergy, blood EOS count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide level), symptom burden (Asthma Control Test score, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale), health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score), exacerbations, and health care resource utilization were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 647 patients with severe asthma, 446 had uncontrolled and 123 had controlled asthma. Among those with uncontrolled asthma, 196 (44%) had 2 or more positive biomarkers, 187 (42%) had 1 positive biomarker, 325 (73%) had low blood EOS, and 63 (14%) were triple-negative. Disease burden was similarly high across uncontrolled subgroups, irrespective of biomarker status, with poor symptom control (Asthma Control Test score 14.9-16.6), impaired health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score 46.7-49.4), clinically important breathlessness (modified Medical Research Council grade ≥2 in 47.3%-57.1%), and 1 or more severe exacerbation (70.6%-76.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Type-2 inflammatory biomarkers did not differentiate disease burden in patients with severe asthma. Patients with low type-2 inflammatory biomarker levels have few biologic therapy options; their needs should be addressed.

Dupilumab and the potential risk of eosinophilic pneumonia: case report, literature review, and FAERS database analysis

Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is a rare but noteworthy adverse effect linked to dupilumab, an interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 inhibitor used in the managing atopic diseases. The underlying mechanisms, potential predisposing factors, clinical characteristics, and optimal management strategies for dupilumab-induced EP remain unclear. We report a 71-year-old patient who developed acute EP after the first 600-mg dose of dupilumab. Eosinophils (EOSs) were also transiently increased (up to 1,600 cells/μl). After the acute EP was effectively treated with glucocorticoids, dupilumab treatment was continued. Rash, itching, and immunoglobulin E levels continued to decrease in the patient, and no further pulmonary adverse events occurred. We combined this case with a literature review of nine articles and analyzed data from 93 cases reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database of patients developing EP after dupilumab use. Our findings imply that dupilumab may induce EP, particularly in individuals over 45 years old, those with a history of respiratory diseases, and those who have previously used inhaled or systemic steroids. Vigilance is required, especially when there is a persistent elevation in peripheral blood EOSs during treatment. Although steroid treatment can effectively manage EP, more data are needed to determine the safety of resuming dupilumab treatment after controlling pneumonia.

Real-world impact of dupilumab on asthma disease burden in Japan: The CROSSROAD study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, a human monoclonal anti-interleukin (IL)-4Ra antibody blocks the shared receptor component of IL-4 and IL-13, drivers of type 2 inflammation. Dupilumab is approved for severe/refractory asthma inadequately controlled by existing therapies, but knowledge of its effect on real-world disease burden is lacking. This study investigates real-world effects of dupilumab on asthma exacerbation risk and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in Japanese individuals with asthma.

METHODS

This retrospective, cohort study used a Japanese insurance claims database to identify patients who started dupilumab between 26 March 2019-31 May 2020. Patients were followed for ±365 days from dupilumab initiation. The study primarily assessed the annual incidence rate of severe asthma exacerbations occurring simultaneously with hospitalizations or OCS bursts. Secondary and exploratory endpoints assessed OCS dosage and duration, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU), respectively.

RESULTS

At dupilumab initiation (N = 215), mean age was 57.2 years, 41.9% of patients were aged ≥65 years, and 59.5% were female. Dupilumab significantly reduced the annual incidence of severe asthma exacerbations from 1.29 to 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.76) per patient per year. Mean OCS dosage decreased from 10.4 to 7.2 mg/day in chronic OCS users; median frequency of OCS bursts decreased from 3 to 0. Both unscheduled outpatient visits (35.8% vs 29.8%) and hospitalizations (21.9% vs 12.1%) decreased. Mean (standard deviation) duration of hospitalization also decreased from 6.7 (27.6) to 2.2 (8.1) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese patients with asthma who received dupilumab had reduced incidence rates of severe asthma exacerbations, OCS use, and HRU over 12 months.

Assessment of dupilumab in children with moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma with or without evidence of allergic asthma

BACKGROUND

Cytokines, such as interleukins (IL)-4/5/13, play a key role in multiple type 2 inflammatory diseases, including allergic asthma. Dupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for IL-4/IL-13, inhibiting signaling. In this post hoc analysis of VOYAGE (NCT02948959), dupilumab efficacy was evaluated in patients aged 6-11 years with type 2 asthma with or without evidence of allergic asthma (baseline serum total IgE ≥30 IU/mL and ≥1 perennial aeroallergen-specific IgE ≥0.35kU/L).

METHODS

Annualized severe exacerbation rates (AER) and changes in pre-bronchodilator (Pre-BD) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 ), percent-predicted pre-BD FEV1 (ppFEV1 ), and Asthma Control Score (ACQ)-7 were assessed during the treatment period.

RESULTS

350 children (261 with and 89 without evidence of allergic asthma) were included. Dupilumab versus placebo significantly reduced AER in patients with (0.24 vs. 0.62, relative risk reduction [RRR]: 62% [95% CI, 39-76], P < .0001) and without (0.39 vs. 0.80, RRR: 51% [95% CI, 0-76], P < .05) evidence of allergic asthma. Significant improvements in ppFEV1 , pre-bronchodilator FEV1 , and ACQ-7 scores were observed in dupilumab versus placebo throughout the treatment period in patients with evidence of allergic asthma. In patients without evidence of allergic asthma, numerical improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and asthma control were observed by Week 52.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab versus placebo reduced asthma exacerbations in children with type 2 asthma irrespective of evidence of allergic asthma; similar trends were observed in changes in lung function. Significant improvement in asthma control was observed in patients with evidence of allergic asthma, but not in those without.

Dupilumab pharmacokinetics and effect on type 2 biomarkers in children with moderate-to-severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Type 2 inflammation is common in children with asthma. Dupilumab, a human antibody, blocks signaling of interleukin-4/-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. In the VOYAGE (NCT02948959) study, dupilumab reduced severe asthma exacerbations and improved lung function in children aged 6-11 years with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess pharmacokinetics of dupilumab and type 2 biomarker changes in children with type 2 asthma in VOYAGE.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to dupilumab 100 mg (≤30 kg) or 200 mg (>30 kg) or placebo every 2 weeks (q2w) for 52 weeks. Dupilumab concentrations and changes in type 2 biomarkers were assessed at each visit.

RESULTS

Dupilumab concentrations in serum reached steady state by Week 12, with mean concentrations of 51.2 mg/L and 79.4 mg/L in children receiving dupilumab 100 mg q2w and 200 mg q2w, respectively (therapeutic range in adults and adolescents: 29-80 mg/L). Reductions in type 2 biomarkers were comparable between regimens, and greater in patients treated with dupilumab vs placebo. In children treated with dupilumab 100 mg and 200 mg q2w, median percent changes (Q1, Q3) from baseline at Week 52 were, respectively, -78.6% (-86.3, -69.80) and -78.6% (-84.9, -70.1) for serum total IgE, -53.6% (-66.4, -34.6) and -43.7% (-58.6, -28.5) for TARC, -25.7% (-60.0, 27.6) and -33.3% (-60.6, 16.6) for blood eosinophils, and -47.7% (-73.8, 18.9) and -55.6% (-73.6, -20.0) for FeNO.

CONCLUSION

Weight-tiered dose regimens achieved mean concentrations within the dupilumab therapeutic range. Median decreases in type 2 biomarker levels were similar between dose regimens.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02948959.

Dupilumab long-term efficacy in patients with non-OCS-dependent asthma with and without evidence of allergic asthma

OBJECTIVE

The open-label extension TRAVERSE study (NCT02134028) assessed dupilumab long-term safety and efficacy in patients who completed Phase 2/3 dupilumab asthma studies. This post hoc analysis evaluated long-term efficacy in type 2 patients with and without evidence of allergic asthma who enrolled in TRAVERSE from Phase 3 QUEST (NCT02414854) and Phase 2b (NCT01854047) studies. Non-type 2 patients with evidence of allergic asthma were also assessed.

METHODS

Unadjusted annualized exacerbation rates during parent study and TRAVERSE treatment period, and changes from parent study baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and in 5-item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores were assessed in patients from QUEST and Phase 2b; change from parent study baseline in total IgE level was assessed in patients enrolled from Phase 2b.

RESULTS

2062 patients from Phase 2b and QUEST enrolled in TRAVERSE. Of these, 969 were type 2 with evidence of allergic asthma; 710 were type 2 without evidence of allergic asthma; and 194 were non-type 2 with evidence of allergic asthma at parent study baseline. In these populations, reductions in exacerbation rates observed during parent studies were sustained during TRAVERSE. Type 2 patients who switched from placebo arm to dupilumab in TRAVERSE experienced similar reductions in severe exacerbation rates, and improvements in lung function and asthma control to those patients who already received dupilumab during the parent study.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab efficacy was sustained for up to 3 years in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 inflammatory asthma, with or without evidence of allergic asthma.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02134028.

Analysis of Differentially Expressed MicroRNAs in Serum and Lung Tissues from Individuals with Severe Asthma Treated with Oral Glucocorticoids

Nowadays, microRNAs (miRNAs) are increasingly used as biomarkers due to their potential contribution to the diagnosis and targeted treatment of a range of diseases. The aim of the study was to analyze the miRNA expression profiles in serum and lung tissue from patients with severe asthma treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS) and those without OCS treatment. For this purpose, serum and lung tissue miRNAs of OCS and non-OCS asthmatic individuals were evaluated by miRNAs-Seq, and subsequently miRNA validation was performed using RT-qPCR. Additionally, pathway enrichment analysis of deregulated miRNAs was conducted. We observed altered expression by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 11 miRNAs in serum, of which five (hsa-miR-148b-3p, hsa-miR-221-5p, hsa-miR-618, hsa-miR-941, and hsa-miR-769-5p) were validated by RT-qPCR, and three miRNAs in lung tissue (hsa-miR-144-3p, hsa-miR-144-5p, and hsa-miR-451a). The best multivariate logistic regression model to differentiate individuals with severe asthma, treated and untreated with OCS, was to combine the serum miRNAs hsa-miR-221-5p and hsa-miR-769-5p. Expression of hsa-miR-148b-3p and hsa-miR-221-5p correlated with FEV1/FVC (%) and these altered miRNAs act in key signaling pathways for asthma disease and the regulated expression of some genes (FOXO3, PTEN, and MAPK3) involved in these pathways. In conclusion, there are miRNA profiles differentially expressed in OCS-treated individuals with asthma and could be used as biomarkers of OCS treatment.

Dupilumab Improves Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Coexisting Asthma Irrespective of Baseline Asthma Characteristics

Purpose

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a predominantly type 2 inflammatory disease frequently coexisting with other type 2 conditions including asthma and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD). Coexisting asthma leads to increased CRSwNP symptom burden. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and -13, demonstrated efficacy in adults with severe CRSwNP in the Phase 3 SINUS-24 (NCT02912468) and SINUS-52 (NCT02898454) studies, including in patients with coexisting asthma/NSAID-ERD. However, the impact of different asthma characteristics on dupilumab treatment in this population is unknown. We report CRSwNP and asthma outcomes with dupilumab in patients with CRSwNP and coexisting asthma according to baseline asthma characteristics.

Methods

Change from baseline at Week 24 (pooled studies) and Week 52 (SINUS-52) in CRSwNP outcomes (nasal polyp score, nasal congestion, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT-22], loss of smell score, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test) and asthma outcomes (5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ-5], pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV₁]) were analyzed post hoc for placebo and dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks according to baseline blood eosinophils ≥150/≥300 cells/µL, ACQ-5 scores <1.5/≥1.5, and FEV₁ <80%.

Results

In the pooled studies, 428/724 patients (59.1%) had coexisting asthma, of which 181/428 (42.3%) had coexisting NSAID-ERD. Dupilumab significantly improved all CRSwNP and asthma outcomes vs placebo at Week 24 (P < 0.001) regardless of baseline eosinophil or ACQ-5 category, or FEV₁ <80%. Similar magnitude of improvement was seen at Week 52 (SINUS-52) and in patients with NSAID-ERD (pooled studies, Week 24). By Week 24, improvements with dupilumab exceeded the minimum clinically important differences for ACQ-5 and SNOT-22 in 35.2% to 74.2% and 72.0% to 78.7% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Dupilumab improved CRSwNP outcomes in patients with CRSwNP and coexisting asthma, and improved asthma outcomes, regardless of differences in baseline asthma characteristics.

Critical evaluation of asthma biomarkers in clinical practice

The advent of personalized medicine has revolutionized the whole approach to the management of asthma, representing the essential basis for future developments. The cornerstones of personalized medicine are the highest precision in diagnosis, individualized prediction of disease evolution, and patient-tailored treatment. To this aim, enormous efforts have been established to discover biomarkers able to predict patients' phenotypes according to clinical, functional, and bio-humoral traits. Biomarkers are objectively measured characteristics used as indicators of biological or pathogenic processes or clinical responses to specific therapeutic interventions. The diagnosis of type-2 asthma, prediction of response to type-2 targeted treatments, and evaluation of the risk of exacerbation and lung function impairment have been associated with biomarkers detectable either in peripheral blood or in airway samples. The surrogate nature of serum biomarkers, set up to be less invasive than sputum analysis or bronchial biopsies, has shown several limits concerning their clinical applicability. Routinely used biomarkers, like peripheral eosinophilia, total IgE, or exhaled nitric oxide, result, even when combined, to be not completely satisfactory in segregating different type-2 asthma phenotypes, particularly in the context of severe asthma where the choice among different biologics is compelling. Moreover, the type-2 low fraction of patients is not only an orphan of biological treatments but is at risk of being misdiagnosed due to the low negative predictive value of type-2 high biomarkers. Sputum inflammatory cell analysis, considered the highest specific biomarker in discriminating eosinophilic inflammation in asthma, and therefore elected as the gold standard in clinical trials and research models, demonstrated many limits in clinical applicability. Many factors may influence the measure of these biomarkers, such as corticosteroid intake, comorbidities, and environmental exposures or habits. Not least, biomarkers variability over time is a confounding factor leading to wrong clinical choices. In this narrative review, we try to explore many aspects concerning the role of routinely used biomarkers in asthma, applying a critical view over the "state of the art" and contemporarily offering an overview of the most recent evidence in this field.

Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries

Asthma is one of the most common noncommunicable diseases; in the majority of patients it is well controlled with inhaled bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, but the management of severe asthma has been a significant challenge historically. The introduction of novel biologic drugs in the past few decades has revolutionised the field, presenting physicians with a variety of biologic drugs with different mechanisms for the treatment of severe asthma.It is of crucial importance to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs by following their "real-life" effectiveness rather than relying solely on their efficacy, established in carefully designed clinical trials, which therefore do not necessarily match the profile of the real-life patient. Understanding the actual effectiveness of the specific drugs in real-life patients is a crucial part of tailoring the right drugs to the right patients. Registries serve as an important tool in obtaining real-life evidence, since they are in effect observational studies, following the entire patient population.