North Carolina pharmacists' willingness to sell fentanyl test strips: a survey study

Alabama community pharmacists' knowledge and perceptions regarding fentanyl test strips: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are used to detect the presence of fentanyl in other substances, but Alabama pharmacists' opinions regarding FTS provision are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perceptions of Alabama pharmacists regarding FTS and factors influencing pharmacists' FTS provision intentions across community pharmacy locations and types.

METHODS

An anonymous cross-sectional survey was distributed via email to Alabama pharmacists employed in community (retail) pharmacies. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions and 5-point Likert-type scales (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Primary outcome measures included: knowledge; general attitudes; perceived benefits; perceived barriers; self-efficacy; subjective norms; perceived behavioral control (PBC); and intention regarding FTS provision. Outcomes were characterized using descriptive statistics and differences in scales scores across pharmacy locations (rural vs. urban) and types (corporately-vs. independently-owned) were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Predictors of FTS provision intentions were evaluated using multiple linear regression (alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Respondents (N = 131; 3.82% response rate) were mostly female (64%) and Caucasian (92%). No respondents stocked FTS at their pharmacy and knowledge about FTS was low (mean[SD] knowledge score: 58.7% [15.1]). Despite the existence of perceived barriers (mean [SD] scale score: 3.2 [0.6]), pharmacists' general attitudes (3.4 [0.5]), perceived benefits (3.7 [0.6]), self-efficacy (3.1 [0.8]), and intentions (3.2[0.7]) were positive. While subjective norms were positive (3.5[0.6]), PBC over FTS decision-making was negative (2.7[0.8]). Subjective norms were higher (P = 0.040) and PBC was lower (P < 0.001) amongst corporately-versus independently-owned pharmacies, but no differences existed between rural and urban locations for any measures. Additionally, perceived benefits (β=0.342, P = 0.002), PBC (β = 0.133, P = 0.045), and self-efficacy (β = 0.142, P = 0.034) were positive predictors and perceived barriers (β = -0.211, P = 0.029) was a negative predictor of intention.

CONCLUSION

Alabama community pharmacists have positive attitudes regarding FTS, but future research should focus on strategies to increase PBC and overcome perceived barriers.

The availability of fentanyl test strips in Georgia community pharmacies

BACKGROUND

Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are increasingly being used to test counterfeit pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs for fentanyl before consumption. On July 1, 2022, Georgia legalized the distribution of FTS. One strategy for expanding FTS distribution in the community involves leveraging community pharmacies. However, less is known about FTS distribution through community pharmacies.

OBJECTIVES

This preliminary study aimed to assess the availability of FTS in Georgia community pharmacies and examine pharmacists' knowledge and attitudes regarding FTS provision.

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional design. A randomized telephone survey of 700 pharmacies, stratified by pharmacy type, was carried out from September 2022 to January 2023. Survey questions assessed FTS stock status, pharmacists' awareness of Georgia's FTS legalization, willingness to receive FTS information, and comfort in providing FTS education. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Of the 376 survey respondents, the vast majority were not aware of the Georgia FTS legalization (82.71% [n = 311]) and did not have FTS stocked in their pharmacies (94.91% [n = 354]). While most participants were willing to receive FTS information (70.21% [n = 264]), only slightly over half reported feeling comfortable providing FTS education (54.70% [n = 205]). Multivariate analyses showed that female participants were less likely to feel comfortable providing FTS education to patients/clients at the pharmacy (adjusted odds ratio: 0.58; confidence interval: 0.36 to 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that Georgia community pharmacies may not stock FTS and that pharmacists may be unaware of the state's FTS legalization, but they are willing to receive information about FTS. Future studies should use a representative sample to design and implement strategies to support pharmacists' provision of FTS, including a destigmatization approach for those not comfortable discussing FTS.

Pharmacy staff-reported adaptations to naloxone provision and over-the-counter (OTC) syringe sales during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences across multiple states and 2 pharmacy chains

BACKGROUND

Access to harm reduction materials was greatly disrupted during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Community pharmacies often continued provision of harm reduction materials as part of their usual operations during the pandemic, but little is known about what, if any, adaptations were made and the perceived impact of these actions from the perspective of pharmacy staff.

OBJECTIVES

We explored how pharmacy staff across 4 states in 2 major pharmacy chains adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic for ongoing naloxone and over-the-counter (OTC) syringe access and how staff perceived the pandemic affected drug use in the community they served and their pharmacy's volume of syringe sales and naloxone provision.

METHODS

We analyzed 134 pharmacy staff responses to a 12-month follow-up assessment for an educational intervention conducted in 2 pharmacy chains in Oregon, Washington, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. Respondents answered closed- and open-ended questions collected online from July 2020 to February 2022. Questions measured prevalence of adaptations and perceived uptake of naloxone and OTC syringe services. Descriptive statistics summarized adaptations and perceived impact and chi-square tests explored differences by state and pharmacy chain. Open-ended responses were reviewed and analyzed to identify summary points and themes.

RESULTS

With few differences by state or pharmacy chain detected, pharmacy staff reported more naloxone mailing, requests by phone, streamlined counseling, and drive-thru provision adaptations to OTC syringe sales and naloxone provision during the pandemic. Most staff perceived adaptations as increasing or maintaining naloxone provision and OTC syringe sales. Respondents described specific aspects of the pharmacy that contributed to successful adaptations, including tailoring to specific product demand, inventory levels, drive-thru access, and a perception of extraordinary public health need at a time of and in places affected by the opioid crisis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacy OTC syringe and naloxone access continued during the COVID-19 pandemic through streamlining workflows and innovating no-contact harm reduction services, reinforcing pharmacy's public health role.