1
|
Shin JE, An HJ, Shim BY, Kim H, Park HS, Cho HM, Kye BH, Yoo RN, Moon JY, Kim SH, Lee J, Lee HC, Jung JH, Lee KM, Lee JM. Clinical Outcomes of Upfront Primary Tumor Resection in Synchronous Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5057. [PMID: 37894424 PMCID: PMC10605032 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer without severe symptoms remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the role of PTR in overall survival (OS) in this population. Among the 205 patients who enrolled, the PTR group (n = 42) showed better performance (p = 0.061), had higher frequencies of right-sided origin (p = 0.058), the T4 stage (p = 0.003), the M1a stage (p = 0.012), and <2 organ metastases (p = 0.002), and received fewer targeted agents (p = 0.011) than the chemotherapy group (n = 163). The PTR group showed a trend for longer OS (20.5 versus 16.0 months, p = 0.064) but was not related to OS in Cox regression multivariate analysis (p = 0.220). The male sex (p = 0.061), a good performance status (p = 0.078), the T3 stage (p = 0.060), the M1a stage (p = 0.042), <2 organ metastases (p = 0.035), an RAS wild tumor (p = 0.054), and the administration of targeted agents (p = 0.037), especially bevacizumab (p = 0.067), seemed to be related to PTR benefits. Upfront PTR could be considered beneficial in some subgroups, but these findings require larger studies to verify.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Shin
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (J.E.S.); (B.Y.S.); (H.K.); (H.S.P.)
| | - Ho Jung An
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (J.E.S.); (B.Y.S.); (H.K.); (H.S.P.)
| | - Byoung Yong Shim
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (J.E.S.); (B.Y.S.); (H.K.); (H.S.P.)
| | - Hyunho Kim
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (J.E.S.); (B.Y.S.); (H.K.); (H.S.P.)
| | - Hyung Soon Park
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (J.E.S.); (B.Y.S.); (H.K.); (H.S.P.)
| | - Hyeon-Min Cho
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (H.-M.C.); (B.-H.K.); (R.N.Y.); (J.-Y.M.)
| | - Bong-Hyeon Kye
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (H.-M.C.); (B.-H.K.); (R.N.Y.); (J.-Y.M.)
| | - Ri Na Yoo
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (H.-M.C.); (B.-H.K.); (R.N.Y.); (J.-Y.M.)
| | - Ji-Yeon Moon
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (H.-M.C.); (B.-H.K.); (R.N.Y.); (J.-Y.M.)
| | - Sung Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (S.H.K.); (J.L.); (H.C.L.)
| | - Jonghoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (S.H.K.); (J.L.); (H.C.L.)
| | - Hyo Chun Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (S.H.K.); (J.L.); (H.C.L.)
| | - Ji-Han Jung
- Department of Hospital Pathology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea;
| | - Kang-Moon Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (K.-M.L.); (J.M.L.)
| | - Ji Min Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea; (K.-M.L.); (J.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bai J, Yang M, Liu Z, Efetov S, Kayaalp C, Dulskas A, Shaw D, Wang X. Primary tumor resection in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable distant metastases: a minireview. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1138407. [PMID: 37182188 PMCID: PMC10172590 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1138407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death among both men and women worldwide and the third most common cancer overall. About 20% of patients diagnosed with CRC were discovered to have distant metastatic lesions, the majority of which were located in the liver. For the optimum treatment of CRC patients with hepatic metastases, interventional radiologists, medical oncologists, and surgeons must all collaborate. The surgical excision of the primary tumor is an important part of CRC treatment since it has been found to be curative in cases of CRC with minimal metastases. However, given the evidence to date was gathered from retrospective data, there is still controversy over the effectiveness of primary tumor resection (PTR) in improving the median overall survival (OS) and quality of life. Patients who have hepatic metastases make up a very tiny fraction of those who are candidates for resection. With a focus on the PTR, this minireview attempted to review the current advancements in the treatment options for hepatic colorectal metastatic illness. This evaluation also included information on PTR's risks when performed on individuals with stage IV CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junge Bai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Yang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zheng Liu,
| | - Sergey Efetov
- Clinic of Coloproctology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Cuneyt Kayaalp
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Audrius Dulskas
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Darcy Shaw
- Colorectal Surgery Associates, Kansas City University, Kansas, MO, United States
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Survival Outcomes after Elective or Emergency Surgery for Synchronous Stage IV Colorectal Cancer. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123114. [PMID: 36551870 PMCID: PMC9775222 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) who have not undergone primary tumor resection (PTR) are at risk of sudden medical emergencies. Despite the ongoing controversy over the necessity and timing of PTR in patients with stage IV CRC, studies comparing the survival outcomes of elective and emergency surgery in this population are scarce. This is a retrospective study conducted at a single institute. The patients were divided into two groups: the elective surgery (ELS) group (n = 46) and the emergency surgery (EMS) group (n = 26). The primary outcome was 2-year overall survival (OS). During a median follow-up period of 27.0 months, the 2-year OS was significantly better in the ELS group (80% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in the 2-year relapse-free survival and 30-day postoperative complication rates. Planning and performing elective surgery could help increase the survival rate of patients with synchronous stage IV CRC, especially those that undergo simultaneous or staged metastasectomy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu LL, Sun JD, Xiang ZL. Survival nomograms for colorectal carcinoma patients with lung metastasis and lung-only metastasis, based on the SEER database and a single-center external validation cohort. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:446. [PMID: 36335295 PMCID: PMC9636633 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02547-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We analysed the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with lung metastasis and lung-only metastasis and determined the risk factors for lung metastasis in CRC patients. Methods Data from colorectal cancer patients with lung metastasis diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 were obtained from the SEER database. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, the Cox proportional hazards regression model, and a competing risk model. The predictive ability of the nomgram was assessed by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. The data from the SEER database for the period 2016–2019 was used as an external validation set. The characteristics of 70 CRC patients treated at Shanghai East Hospital between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed and data from China was chosen as an external validation set. Results The median survival time for colorectal cancer patients with lung metastasis was 12 months, while this value was 24 months in patients with lung-only metastasis. Among all CRC patients with lung metastasis, age, grade, T stage, N stage, presence of liver, brain or bone metastasis, anatomic site and surgery were related to overall survival (OS). In CRC patients with lung-only metastasis, age, T stage, marital status, chemotherapy and surgery were independent prognostic factors affecting OS. Two nomograms predicting OS were established, with great discrimination (C-index between 0.67 and 0.81) and excellent calibration. Factors including age, race, sex, tumour grade, T stage, N stage, presence of liver, brain or bone metastasis, marital status, insurance status and anatomic location were related to the occurrence of lung metastasis in CRC patients. Conclusion We developed two reliable clinical prediction models among CRC patients to predict the OS rates in patients with lung metastasis and lung metastasis only. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02547-9.
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang L, Wei G, Chen N, Liu J, Wang Z, Yu Y, Qiu M. Impact of Upfront Chemotherapy on the Effect of Primary Tumour Resection for Asymptomatic Synchronous Colorectal Cancer With Unresectable Metastases: A Propensity-Score-Matched Cohort Analysis. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2022; 16:11795549221085054. [PMID: 35355515 PMCID: PMC8958687 DOI: 10.1177/11795549221085054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: It is controversial whether primary tumour resection (PTR) and the sequencing of chemotherapy and PTR are associated with the survival of patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer. This study aimed to explore the effects of PTR and the sequencing of chemotherapy and PTR on asymptomatic colorectal cancer with synchronous unresectable metastases (asmCRC). Patients and Methods: Patients with asmCRC were retrospectively identified from a single centre and categorised into 3 groups: PTR followed by chemotherapy (POC), upfront chemotherapy followed by PTR (UFC), and palliative chemotherapy (PC). The primary end points included median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Clinical features were analysed using χ2 test, while survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier test. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed when comparing survival between POC and UFC groups. Results: From 2008 to 2014, 255 patients were identified and included into the POC (n = 101), UFC (n = 40), and PC (n = 114) groups. The UFC and POC groups had significantly better median OS compared with the PC group (40.7 vs 16.3 months, P < .0001; 39.7 vs 16.3 months, P < .0001). Before PSM, the UFC group had better median PFS than the POC and PC groups (18.5 vs 9.7 months, P = .038; 18.5 vs 6.1 months, P < .0001). After PSM, UFC has better PFS than POC (P = .038). And the UFC group did not have higher postoperative or preoperative morbidity compared with the POC group (P = .235). Conclusions: Primary tumour resection could improve the survival of patients with asmCRC. Compared with POC or PC, UFC was associated with a better median PFS without significantly increasing preoperative or postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Huang
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Guixia Wei
- Department of Abdominal Cancer, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Nan Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiewei Liu
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yongyang Yu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Meng Qiu
- Department of Abdominal Cancer, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tai Q, Xue W, Li M, Zhuo S, Zhang H, Fang F, Zhang J. Survival Nomogram for Metastasis Colon Cancer Patients Based on SEER Database. Front Genet 2022; 13:832060. [PMID: 35222547 PMCID: PMC8864078 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.832060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: A prediction model for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of metastatic colon cancer (mCC) patients was developed by analyzing important risk factors for the prognosis of mCC patients based on the SEER database. Method: The characteristic of 10,946 patients diagnosed with mCC between 2010 and 2015 was obtained from the SEER database. The population was randomly divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate cox for independent predictors of mCC prognosis were performed, and nomogram was constructed. The accuracy of the model was verified by calibration curves, ROC curves, and C-index, and the clinical utility of the model was analyzed using decision analysis curves. Result: Age, primary site, grade, surgery, and other eight factors were significantly associated with the prognosis of mCC patients, and these predictors were included in the construction of the nomogram. The C-index was 0.731 (95% CI 0.725–0.737) and 0.736 (95% CI 0.726–0.746) for the training cohort and the validation set, respectively. The results of the ROC curve analysis indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) exceeded 0.7 for both the training cohort and the validation set at 1, 3, and 5 years. Conclusion: The constructed prediction model had an excellent predictive accuracy, which will help clinical decision-making of mCC patients after surgery and individualized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinwen Tai
- Department of General Surgery, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Qinwen Tai, ; Jinhui Zhang,
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Pharmacy, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China
| | - Mengying Li
- The First College of Clinical Science, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Shuli Zhuo
- Medical College of Shaoguan University, Shaoguan, China
| | - Heng Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Fa Fang
- Department of General Surgery, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jinhui Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Qinwen Tai, ; Jinhui Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hamed RA, Marks S, Mcelligott H, Kalachand R, Ibrahim H, Atyani S, Korpanty G, Osman N. Inoperable de novo metastatic colorectal cancer with primary tumour in situ: Evaluating discordant responses to upfront systemic therapy of the primary tumours and metastatic sites and complications arising from primary tumours (experiences from an Irish Cancer Centre). Mol Clin Oncol 2022; 16:40. [PMID: 35003738 PMCID: PMC8739439 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for de novo metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Heterogeneity between primary tumours and metastases may lead to discordant responses to systemic therapy at these sites. The aim of the present study was to examine these discrepancies and to evaluate the rates of complications arising from the primary tumour and the strategies employed to manage these complications. Electronic medical records were screened for patients eligible for data analysis between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2019. All patients diagnosed with de novo mCRC with primary tumour in situ at the time of initial systemic therapy were included in data analysis. Responses in primary tumour and metastatic sites (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours v1.1), discrepancies in these responses and rates of complications arising from primary tumours were assessed along with patient, pathological or molecular factors that may be associated with these discrepant responses or primary tumour complications. A total of 50 patients were identified (median age, 62 years). Right-colon, left-colon and rectal primary tumours comprised 34, 44 and 22% of CRC cases, respectively. All patients received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (either alone or in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan). Disease response (DR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were observed as the first response to systemic therapy in 24, 62 and 12% of primary tumours and in 36, 18 and 44% of metastatic sites, respectively. Only 36% of patients demonstrated concordant responses between the primary tumours and metastases, while the remaining 62% demonstrated discordant responses between the primary tumour and distant metastases (22% had DR with SD; 36% had DR or SD with PD; and 4% had PD with SD in the primary tumour and metastases, respectively). Restaging images were not available for 2% of the patients. Approximately 30% of patients developed complications from primary tumours, including bowel obstruction (6.12%), perforation (6%), rectal pain (6%) and rectal bleeding (10%). Approximately 10% of patients underwent palliative stoma creation. Additionally, 12% required palliative radiotherapy to the primary tumour (due to localized complications arising from the tumour). Discordant responses to systemic therapy between primary tumours and metastases occurred in 60% of patients with de novo mCRC (with primary tumour in situ at the time of first systemic therapy). The observations of the present study have potential implications for molecular tissue analysis to help guide systemic therapy. Tissue from metastatic sites may be preferable to confirm biomarker status in mCRC based on this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruba A Hamed
- Department of Oncology, Mid-Western Cancer Centre, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick V94 F858, Ireland
| | - Sam Marks
- Department of Oncology, Mid-Western Cancer Centre, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick V94 F858, Ireland
| | - Helen Mcelligott
- Department of Oncology, Mid-Western Cancer Centre, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick V94 F858, Ireland
| | - Roshni Kalachand
- Department of Oncology, Mid-Western Cancer Centre, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick V94 F858, Ireland
| | - Hawa Ibrahim
- Palliative Department, St. Francis Hospice, Dublin 5 D05 T9K8, Ireland
| | - Said Atyani
- Radiology Department, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick V94 F858, Ireland
| | - Greg Korpanty
- Department of Oncology, Mid-Western Cancer Centre, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick V94 F858, Ireland
| | - Nemer Osman
- Department of Oncology, Mid-Western Cancer Centre, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick V94 F858, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Doah KY, Shin US, Jeon BH, Cho SS, Moon SM. The Impact of Primary Tumor Resection on Survival in Asymptomatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Unresectable Metastases. Ann Coloproctol 2021; 37:94-100. [PMID: 33979907 PMCID: PMC8134925 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.15.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of primary tumor resection (PTR) in asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with unresectable metastases using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to minimize selection bias. Methods We selected 146 patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC with unresectable metastasis between 2001 and 2018 from our institutional database. In a multivariate logistic regression model using the patients’ baseline covariates associated with PTR, we applied the IPTW method based on a propensity score and performed a weighted Cox proportional regression analysis to estimate survival according to PTR. Results Upfront PTR was performed in 98 patients, and no significant differences in baseline factors were detected. The upweighted median survival of the PTR group was 18 months and that of the non-PTR group was 15 months (P = 0.15). After applying the IPTW, the PTR was still insignificant in the univariate Cox regression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–1.21). However, in the multivariate weighted Cox regression with adjustment for other covariates, the PTR showed a significantly decreased risk of cancer-related death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40–0.94). Conclusion In this study, we showed that asymptomatic CRC patients with unresectable metastases could gain a survival benefit from upfront PTR by analysis with the IPTW method. However, randomized controlled trials are mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Yoon Doah
- Department of Surgery, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ui Sup Shin
- Department of Surgery, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Ho Jeon
- Department of Surgery, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Sik Cho
- Department of Surgery, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Mi Moon
- Department of Surgery, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ma ZH, Wang YP, Zheng WH, Ma J, Bai X, Zhang Y, Wang YH, Chi D, Fu XB, Hua XD. Prognostic factors and therapeutic effects of different treatment modalities for colorectal cancer liver metastases. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12:1177-1194. [PMID: 33133385 PMCID: PMC7579728 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in China, and the liver is the most common metastatic site in patients with advanced CRC. Hepatectomy is the gold standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases. For patients who cannot undergo radical resection of liver metastases for various reasons, ablation therapy, interventional therapy, and systemic chemotherapy can be used to improve their quality of life and prolong their survival time.
AIM To explore the prognostic factors and treatments of liver metastases of CRC.
METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 patients with liver metastases from CRC treated at the Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute between January 2005 and March 2011. According to different treatments, the patients were divided into the following four groups: Surgical resection group (36 patients); ablation group (23 patients); intervention group (15 patients); and drug group (13 patients). The clinicopathological data and postoperative survival of the four groups were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for multivariate analysis.
RESULTS The median survival time of the 87 patients was 38.747 ± 3.062 mo, and the 1- and 3-year survival rates were 87.5% and 53.1%, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model showed that the following factors were independent factors affecting prognosis: The degree of tumor differentiation, the number of metastases, the size of metastases, and whether the metastases are close to great vessels. The results of treatment factor analysis showed that the effect of surgical treatment was better than that of drugs, intervention, or ablation alone, and the median survival time was 48.83 ± 4.36 mo. The drug group had the worst prognosis, with a median survival time of only 13.5 ± 0.7 mo (P < 0.05). For patients with liver metastases of CRC near the great vessels, the median survival time (27.3 mo) of patients undergoing surgical resection was better than that of patients using other treatments (20.6 mo) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION Patients with a low degree of primary tumor differentiation, multiple liver metastases (number of tumors > 4), and maximum diameter of liver metastases > 5 cm have a poor prognosis. Among drug therapy, intervention, ablation, and surgical treatment options, surgical treatment is the first choice for liver metastases. When liver metastases are close to great vessels, surgical treatment is significantly better than drug therapy, intervention, and ablation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuo-Hong Ma
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yong-Peng Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Wen-Heng Zheng
- Department of Medical Imaging, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Ji Ma
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xue Bai
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yuan-He Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Da Chi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xi-Bo Fu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xiang-Dong Hua
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Han MH, Park YY, Pratap S, Han YD, Cho MS, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY, Kim NK. Short-term Outcomes After Upfront Chemotherapy Followed by Curative Surgery in Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Comparison With Upfront Surgery Patients. Ann Coloproctol 2020; 35:327-334. [PMID: 31937072 PMCID: PMC6968719 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2019.03.04.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Upfront systemic chemotherapy with target agents has been recommended for patients with stage IV colon cancer. Some with partial response are considered for curative resection. There is high risk of developing postoperative complications following upfront systemic chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate short-term perioperative outcomes of curative surgery after upfront chemotherapy in comparison with upfront surgery in patients with metastatic colon cancer. Methods Between January 2010 and October 2015, 146 patients (80 in the surgery first group, 66 in the upfront chemotherapy group) who underwent surgical resection before or after systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer were included in the present study. All decisions for treatment were made through a multidisciplinary team. Postoperative clinical outcomes and complications were analyzed to compare the groups. Results There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative clinical outcomes. Overall complication rates were not different between the groups (surgery first group: 46.3% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 60.6%; P = 0.084). When classified according to the Clavien-Dindo method, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of major complications (grade 3 or more) (surgery first group: 18.9% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 27.5%; P = 0.374). Conclusion There was no significant increase in major postoperative complications in metastatic colon cancer patients who received upfront chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Careful patient selection and treatment planning are important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myung Hyun Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youn Young Park
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Shiva Pratap
- Department of Surgery, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Yoon Dae Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Korea
| | - Min Soo Cho
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyuk Hur
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Soh Min
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kang Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nam Kyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sterpetti AV, Costi U, D'Ermo G. National statistics about resection of the primary tumor in asymptomatic patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer and unresectable metastases. Need for improvement in data collection. A systematic review with meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2019; 33:11-18. [PMID: 31885359 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with asymptomatic Stage IV colorectal cancer represent a significant heterogeneous group. National statistics represent an effective method to follow in real time the clinical outcomes of patients, and they may represent an important tool to analyze and to compare different therapeutic approaches. The aim of our study was to analyze the reviews of national data and single institutions reports, which compared the clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic Stage IV colorectal cancer and un-resectable metastases who had resection of the primary tumor with those who did not have resection. We gave special attention to the number of missing established relevant variables, to determine the appropriateness of the results of the published studies. MATERIAL We performed a systematic review of papers comparing patients who had and who had not primary tumor resection. Screened reports included the time of publication from June 2012 to June 2018; 2556 papers were identified and 27 were included into the review. The primary outcome was observed survival. We analyzed the number of major missing variables in National Data Bases and Single Institution Reports, to assess the overall validity of the conclusions of the analyzed reports. RESULTS In the majority of the reports and in the meta-analysis of studies with propensity score matching, resection of the primary tumor was correlated to improved survival and to the possibility for a better response to postoperative chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The high number of missing significant variables, and a clear clinical selection in single center reports make any analysis error-prone. National statistics might represent a valid method to follow in real time the clinical outcomes of these patients, comparing different therapeutic approaches. There is the need for improvement in national data collection, to make descriptive national statistics the ground for future progress in treatment. (PROSPERO) CRD 42018089691.
Collapse
|
12
|
Simillis C, Kalakouti E, Afxentiou T, Kontovounisios C, Smith JJ, Cunningham D, Adamina M, Tekkis PP. Primary Tumor Resection in Patients with Incurable Localized or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg 2019; 43:1829-1840. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-04984-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
13
|
Harji DP, Vallance A, Selgimann J, Bach S, Mohamed F, Brown J, Fearnhead N. A systematic analysis highlighting deficiencies in reported outcomes for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer undergoing palliative resection of the primary tumour. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2018; 44:1469-1478. [PMID: 30007475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of the primary tumour in the presence of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is controversial. The role of primary tumour resection (PTR) has been investigated by a number of retrospective cohort studies, with a number on going randomised controlled trials. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical and patient-reported outcomes currently reported in studies that evaluate the role of PTR in mCRC. METHODS Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE (via OvidSP) (1966-June 2017), EMBASE (via OvidSP) and the Cochrane Library using terms related to colorectal cancer and primary tumour resection. All studies documenting outcomes following palliative PTR were included. Eligible articles were assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies of Intervention (ROBINS-I) tool. RESULTS Of 11,209 studies screened, 59 non-randomised studies reporting outcomes on 331,157 patients were included. Patient characteristics regarding performance status and co-morbidity were recorded in 26 (44.1%) and 17 (28.8%) studies. The chemotherapy regime used was reported in 27 (45.8%) studies. The operative setting and the operative approach was reported in 42 (71%) and 14 (23.7%) studies. Post-operative mortality and morbidity were reported in 33 (55.9%) and 35 (59.3%) studies. Overall survival was reported in 49 (83.1%) studies, with 5 different definitions identified. Quality of life was only reported in 1 (1.7%) study. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates significant heterogeneity in the selection and definition of outcomes reported following PTR in mCRC. There is significant heterogeneity with a significant under-reporting of important outcomes such as treatment related adverse events and patient reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deena P Harji
- Newcastle Centre of Bowel Disease, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, UK.
| | - Abigail Vallance
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons, London, UK
| | - Jenny Selgimann
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Simon Bach
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Faheez Mohamed
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospital Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Julia Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Nicola Fearnhead
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang RX, Ma WJ, Gu YT, Zhang TQ, Huang ZM, Lu ZH, Gu YK. Primary tumor location as a predictor of the benefit of palliative resection for colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis. World J Surg Oncol 2017; 15:138. [PMID: 28750680 PMCID: PMC5530936 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1198-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It is still under debate that whether stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastasis can benefit from primary tumor resection, especially for asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients. Retrospective studies have shown controversial results concerning the benefit from surgery. This retrospective study aims to evaluate whether the site of primary tumor is a predictor of palliative resection in asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer patients. Methods One hundred ninety-four patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer were selected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Database in the period between January 2007 and December 2013. All information was carefully reviewed and collected, including the treatment, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, site of tumor, histology, cancer antigen 199, number of liver metastases, and largest diameter of liver metastasis. The univariate and multivariate analyses were used to detect the relationship between primary tumor resection and overall survival of unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer patients. Results One hundred twenty-five received palliative resection, and 69 received only chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis indicated that primary tumor site was one of the independent factors (RR 0.569, P = 0.007) that influenced overall survival. For left-side colon cancer patients, primary tumor resection prolonged the median overall survival time for 8 months (palliative resection vs. no palliative resection: 22 vs. 14 months, P = 0.009); however, for right-side colon cancer patients, palliative resection showed no benefit (12 vs. 10 months, P = 0.910). Conclusions This study showed that left-side colon cancer patients might benefit from the primary tumor resection in terms of overall survival. This result should be further explored in a prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong-Xin Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen-Juan Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Ting Gu
- Medical Record Department of The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Tian-Qi Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Microinvasive Interventional Department, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Mei Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Microinvasive Interventional Department, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen-Hai Lu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Yang-Kui Gu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China. .,Microinvasive Interventional Department, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xu Z, Chi P, Pan J, Shen S, Sun Y, Wang X, Lu X. Knockdown of KLK11 inhibits cell proliferation and increases oxaliplatin sensitivity in human colorectal cancer. Exp Ther Med 2016; 12:2855-2860. [PMID: 27882085 PMCID: PMC5103714 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been reported that kallikrein 11 (KLK11) is crucially involved in the development and progression of various types of cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms that underlie the involvement of KLK11 in aberrant colorectal cancer (CRC) cell growth remain largely unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of KLK11 and the effects of KLK11 on oxaliplatin (L-OHP) chemosensitivity by knocking down KLK11 in LOVO and HCT-8 cells. Loss-of-function assays revealed KLK11 inhibition significantly inhibited growth and induced apoptosis of CRC cells in vitro. Notably, further experiments found that knockdown of KLK11 expression increased the L-OHP chemosensitivity of CRC cells. KLK11 inhibition of increased L-OHP-induced apoptosis may be associated with activation of caspase-3 cleavage and the apoptosis signaling pathway. The present results indicated that KLK11 may be an potential target of interest for future research into therapies for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongbin Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
| | - Jie Pan
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
| | - Songfei Shen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
| | - Yanwu Sun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
| | - Xiaojie Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
| | - Xingrong Lu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|