1
|
Ditonno F, Franco A, Veccia A, Bertolo R, Wu Z, Wang L, Abdollah F, Finati M, Simone G, Tuderti G, Helstrom E, Correa A, De Cobelli O, Ferro M, Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Tufano A, Perdonà S, Bhanvadia R, Margulis V, Brönimann S, Singla N, Puri D, Derweesh IH, Mendiola DF, Gonzalgo ML, Ben-David R, Mehrazin R, Moon SC, Rais-Bahrami S, Yong C, Sundaram CP, Moghaddam FS, Ghoreifi A, Djaladat H, Autorino R, Antonelli A. Decisional and prognostic impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-institutional collaborative analysis (ROBUUST collaborative group). Urol Oncol 2024; 42:290.e1-290.e9. [PMID: 38760274 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) with or without biopsy remains a subject of contention in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with varying recommendations across different guidelines. The study aims to analyse the decision-making and prognostic role of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) in high-risk UTUC patients undergoing curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective multi-institutional analysis of high-risk UTUC patients from the ROBUUST dataset, a comparison between patients who received or not preoperative URS and biopsy before curative surgery was carried out. Logistic regression analysis evaluated differences between patients receiving URS and its impact on treatment strategy. Survival analysis included 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). After adjusting for high-risk prognostic group features, Cox proportional hazard model estimated significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 1,912 patients were included, 1,035 with preoperative URS and biopsy and 877 without. Median follow-up: 24 months. Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy was the most common procedure (55.1%), in both subgroups. The 5-year OS (P = 0.04) and CSS (P < 0.001) were significantly higher for patients undergoing URS. The 5-year RFS (P = 0.6), and MFS (P = 0.3) were comparable between the 2 groups. Preoperative URS and biopsy were neither a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes nor of a specific treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS The advantage in terms of OS and CSS in patients undergoing preoperative URS could derive from a better selection of candidates for curative treatment. The treatment strategy is likely more influenced by tumor features than by URS findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ditonno
- University of Verona, Department of Urology, Verona, Italy; Rush University, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL
| | - Antonio Franco
- Rush University, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Zhenjie Wu
- Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University, Department of Urology, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University, Department of Urology, Shanghai, China
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Henry Ford Hospital, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Marco Finati
- Henry Ford Hospital, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Emma Helstrom
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andres Correa
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Matteo Ferro
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Division of Urology, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Division of Urology, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Division of Urology, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Department of Urology, Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Department of Urology, Naples, Italy
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Stephan Brönimann
- John Hopkins University, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nirmish Singla
- John Hopkins University, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dhruv Puri
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA
| | - Dinno F Mendiola
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Reuben Ben-David
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | - Sol C Moon
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Courtney Yong
- Indiana University, Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakano J, Urabe F, Kiuchi Y, Takamizawa S, Suzuki H, Kawano S, Miyajima K, Fukuokaya W, Takahashi K, Iwatani K, Imai Y, Kayano S, Aikawa K, Yanagisawa T, Tashiro K, Yuen S, Sato S, Tsuzuki S, Miki J, Kimura T. The clinical impact of ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter study. Int J Urol 2024; 31:394-401. [PMID: 38151321 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the development of kidney-sparing surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, ureteroscopic biopsy (URSBx) has become important for the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 744 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), stratified into no ureteroscopy (URS), URS alone, and URSBx groups. Intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) was examined using the Kaplan-Meier method. We conducted Cox regression analyses to identify risk factors for IVR. We investigated differences between clinical and pathological staging to assess the ability to predict the pathological tumor stage and grade of RNU specimens. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression revealed significantly more IVR and inferior IVRFS in patients who underwent URS and URSBx. Superficial, but not invasive, bladder cancer recurrence was more frequent in the URS and URSBx groups than in the no URS group. Clinical and pathological staging agreed for 55 (32.4%) patients. Downstaging occurred for 48 (28.2%) patients and clinical understaging occurred for 67 (39.4%) patients. Upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred for 39 (35.8%) of 109 patients with ≤cT1 disease. Clinical and pathological grading were similar for 72 (42.3%) patients. Downgrading occurred for 5 (2.9%) patients, and clinical undergrading occurred for 93 (54.7%) patients. CONCLUSION URS and URSBx instrumentation will be risk factors for superficial, but not invasive, bladder cancer recurrence. Clinical understaging/undergrading and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred for a large proportion of patients with UTUC who underwent RNU. These data emphasize the challenges involved in accurate UTUC staging and grading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juria Nakano
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuria Kiuchi
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Hirotaka Suzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shota Kawano
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Miyajima
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Takahashi
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yu Imai
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sotaro Kayano
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Aikawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kojiro Tashiro
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Jikei Katsushika Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Steffi Yuen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shun Sato
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gravestock P, Cullum D, Somani B, Veeratterapillay R. Diagnosing upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A review of the role of diagnostic ureteroscopy and novel developments over last two decades. Asian J Urol 2024; 11:242-252. [PMID: 38680592 PMCID: PMC11053284 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The role of ureteroscopy in the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is yet to be fully determined. We aimed to provide an up to date evaluation of its role and the emerging technologies in the field. Methods A literature search of the last two decades (from 24th May, 2001 to 24th May, 2021) was carried out identifying 147 papers for potential inclusion within this narrative review. Results Diagnostic ureteroscopy is undeniably useful in its ability to visualise and biopsy indeterminate lesions, and to risk stratify malignant lesions that may be suitable for kidney sparing surgery. However, an increased risk of intravesical recurrence following nephroureterectomy when a prior diagnostic ureteroscopy has been performed, inadequate sampling at biopsy, complications from the procedure, and difficult ureteric access are all potential drawbacks. Furthermore, whilst generally an accurate diagnostic procedure, it risks missing carcinoma in-situ lesions. Despite this, evidence shows that routine use of ureteroscopy changes the management of patients in a large proportion of cases, preventing unnecessary surgery or facilitating kidney sparing surgery. The overall rate of complications is low, and improved biopsy techniques and the use of tissue biomarkers for improved staging and grading are encouraging. The risks of delays to definitive management and post-ureteroscopy intravesical recurrence do not seem to affect survival, and trials are in progress to determine whether intravesical therapy can mitigate the latter. Further promising techniques are being investigated to improve shortcomings, particularly in relation to improved diagnosis of carcinoma in situ and preoperative staging. Conclusion Ureteroscopy has a role in the diagnosis of upper tract malignancy, though whether it should be used routinely is yet to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gravestock
- Urology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel Cullum
- Urology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen CY, Chang CH, Yang CR, Hsieh KL, Tsing WH, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Huang CY, Hong JH, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Tsai YC, Wu SY, Shen CH, Cheong IS, Chen CS, Yang CK, Jiang YH, Tsai CY, Hsueh TY, Chen YT, Wu CC, Lo SH, Chiang BJ, Lin WY, Lin PH, Tai TY, Li WM, Lee HY. Prognostic factors of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2024; 42:22. [PMID: 38197890 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04700-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate predictive factors of increasing intravesical recurrence (IVR) rate in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after receiving radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) with bladder cuff excision (BCE). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 2114 patients were included from the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group. It was divided into two groups: IVR-free and IVR after RNUx, with 1527 and 587 patients, respectively. To determine the factors affecting IVR, TNM stage, the usage of pre-operative ureteroscopy, and pathological outcomes were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate the rates of prognostic outcomes in overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), and the survival curves were compared using the stratified log-rank test. RESULTS Based on our research, ureter tumor, female, smoking history, age (< 70 years old), multifocal tumor, history of bladder cancer were determined to increase the risk of IVR after univariate analysis. The multivariable analysis revealed that female (BRFS for male: HR 0.566, 95% CI 0.469-0.681, p < 0.001), ureter tumor (BRFS: HR 1.359, 95% CI 1.133-1.631, p = 0.001), multifocal (BRFS: HR 1.200, 95% CI 1.001-1.439, p = 0.049), history of bladder cancer (BRFS: HR 1.480, 95% CI 1.118-1.959, p = 0.006) were the prognostic factors for IVR. Patients who ever received ureterorenoscopy (URS) did not increase the risk of IVR. CONCLUSION Patients with ureter tumor and previous bladder UC history are important factors to increase the risk of IVR after RNUx. Pre-operative URS manipulation is not associated with higher risk of IVR and diagnostic URS is feasible especially for insufficient information of image study. More frequent surveillance regimen may be needed for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Ya Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Rei Yang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Lin Hsieh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsin Tsing
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Science, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Hua Hong
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Yu Wu
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Huang Shen
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
- Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Kuang Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Divisions of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hsiu Lo
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hung Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Yao Tai
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bitaraf M, Ghafoori Yazdi M, Amini E. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4987. [PMID: 37894354 PMCID: PMC10605461 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis and risk stratification are cornerstones of therapeutic decisions in the management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Diagnostic modalities provide data that can be integrated, to provide nomograms and stratification tools to predict survival and adverse outcomes. This study reviews cytology, ureterorenoscopy and the novel tools and techniques used with it (including photodynamic diagnosis, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser endomicroscopy), and biopsy. Imaging modalities and novel biomarkers are discussed in another article. Patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors, their association with survival indices, and their roles in different scores and predictive tools are discussed. Patient-related factors include age, sex, ethnicity, tobacco consumption, surgical delay, sarcopenia, nutritional status, and several blood-based markers. Tumor-related prognosticators comprise stage, grade, presentation, location, multifocality, size, lymphovascular invasion, surgical margins, lymph node status, mutational landscape, architecture, histologic variants, and tumor-stroma ratio. The accuracy and validation of pre-operative predictive tools, which incorporate various prognosticators to predict the risk of muscle-invasive or non-organ confined disease, and help to decide on the surgery type (radical nephroureterectomy, or kidney-sparing procedures) are also investigated. Post-operative nomograms, which help decide on adjuvant chemotherapy and plan follow-up are explored. Finally, a revision of the current stratification of UTUC patients is endorsed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erfan Amini
- Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1419733141, Iran; (M.B.); (M.G.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trail M, Rahman MSW, Broadhurst WJ, Blackmur JP, Sharma A, Chew E, O'Donnell M, Keanie JY, Brush J, Taylor J, Phipps S, Thomas B, Mains EAA, McNeill SA, Leung S, Cutress ML, Laird A. Diagnostic evaluation of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: can we safely omit diagnostic ureteroscopy? BJU Int 2023; 131:755-762. [PMID: 36495480 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify clinicopathological or radiological factors that may predict a diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) to inform which patients can proceed directly to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) without the delay for diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS). PATIENTS AND METHODS All consecutive patients investigated for suspected UTUC in a high-volume UK centre between 2011 and 2017 were identified through retrospective analysis of surgical logbooks and a prospectively maintained pathology database. Details on clinical presentation, radiological findings, and URS/RNU histopathology results were evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of a final diagnosis of UTUC. RESULTS In all, 260 patients were investigated, of whom 230 (89.2%) underwent URS. RNU was performed in 131 patients (50.4%), of whom 25 (9.6%) proceeded directly without URS - all of whom had a final histopathological diagnosis of UTUC - and 15 (11.5%) underwent RNU after URS despite no conclusive histopathological confirmation of UTUC. Major surgery was avoided in 77 patients (33.5%) where a benign or alternative diagnosis was made on URS, and 14 patients (6.1%) underwent nephron-sparing surgery. Overall, 178 patients (68.5%) had a final diagnosis of UTUC confirmed on URS/RNU histopathology. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, a presenting complaint of visible haematuria (hazard ratio [HR] 5.17, confidence interval [CI] 1.91-14.0; P = 0.001), a solid lesion reported on imaging (HR 37.8, CI = 11.7-122.1; P < 0.001) and a history of smoking (HR 3.07, CI 1.35-6.97; P = 0.007), were predictive of a final diagnosis of UTUC. From this cohort, 51 (96.2%) of 53 smokers who presented with visible haematuria and who had a solid lesion on computed tomography urogram had UTUC on final histopathology. CONCLUSION We identified specific factors which may assist clinicians in selecting which patients may reliably proceed to RNU without the delay of diagnostic URS. These findings may inform a prospective multicentre analysis including additional variables such as urinary cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Trail
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - William J Broadhurst
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James P Blackmur
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Genomic & Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Abhishek Sharma
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Etienne Chew
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marie O'Donnell
- Department of Histopathology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Julian Y Keanie
- Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John Brush
- Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John Taylor
- Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Simon Phipps
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ben Thomas
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - S Alan McNeill
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Steve Leung
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark L Cutress
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alexander Laird
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Genomic & Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Preoperative upper tract invasive diagnostic modalities are associated with intravesical recurrence following surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A population-based study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281304. [PMID: 36730353 PMCID: PMC9894449 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a clinical problem. We investigated if preoperative invasive diagnostic modalities (IDM) such as antegrade/retrograde uretero-pyelography and/or selective urine cytology/barbotage, and URS with or without concomitant biopsy are associated with IVR after radical surgery for UTUC. Risk of death from urothelial cancer and all causes was investigated as secondary outcomes. METHODS We investigated a population-based cohort of 1038 consecutive patients subjected to radical surgery for UTUC 2015-2019 in Sweden, using the Bladder Cancer Data Base Sweden (BladderBaSe 2.0), comprising all patients in the Swedish National Registry of Urinary Bladder Cancer. Risk estimates of IVR, death from urothelial cancer, and all causes was assessed using multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS The study included 536 cases with and 502 without preoperative IDM. IDM was associated with increased risk of IVR (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.52) and risk of urothelial cancer death (HR 1.56, CI 1.12-2.18), compared to no IDM after a median follow-up of 1.3 yrs. Stratified analysis for tumor location showed that IDM was associated with risk of IVR in ureteric cancer (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.21-2.28) but not in renal pelvic cancer (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.81-1.41). Limitations included the observational setting and the lack of variables such as tumour grade, multifocality and preoperative hydronephrosis. CONCLUSIONS Worse outcomes for patients subjected to preoperative IDM highlight the need for carefully considering diagnostic decisions for UTUC patients, specifically in tumours located in the ureter.
Collapse
|
8
|
Luo Z, Jiao B, Su C, Zhao H, Yan Y, Pan Y, Ren J, Zhang G, Ding Z. Correlation between the timing of diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial cancer and intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1122877. [PMID: 37035140 PMCID: PMC10073531 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1122877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective We aimed to evaluate the effect of the timing of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) on intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Patients and methods The clinical data of 220 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU at our center from June 2010 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the timing of the URS, all patients were divided into three groups: the no URS group, the 1-session group (diagnostic URS immediately followed by RNU), and the 2-session group (RNU after diagnostic URS). Additionally, we analyzed IVR-free survival (IVRFS) using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional regression methods. Results The median follow-up period of these 220 patents was 41 (range: 2-143) months. Among them, 58 patients developed IVR following RNU. Kaplan-Meier curve displayed a significantly higher IVR rate in both treatment groups than in the no-URS group (p=0.025). In the subgroup of patients with renal pelvis cancer, the incidence of IVR was significantly higher in both treatment groups than in the group without URS (p=0.006). In univariate Cox proportional regression analysis, the two treatment groups were risk factors for IVR compared to the no-URS group [p=0.027, hazard ratio (HR): 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-3.46]. The two-stage group (p=0.032, HR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.08-3.65), positive urine pathology (p<0.001, HR: 8.12, 95% CI: 3.63-18.15), adjuvant chemotherapy (p<0.001, HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10-0.38), and positive margin (p<0.0001, HR: 7.50, 95% CI: 2.44-23.08) were all identified as independent predictors in the multivariate. Conclusion This study revealed that delayed RNU following diagnostic URS may increase the risk of postoperative IVR in patients with UTUC, preoperatively positive uropathology, and positive surgical margin were risk factors for IVR after RNU, while early postoperative chemotherapy may effectively prevent IVR. Delay of RUN after URS could increase the risk of IVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenkai Luo
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Binbin Jiao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Caixia Su
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Hang Zhao
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yangxuanyu Yan
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yijin Pan
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Ren
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guan Zhang
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Guan Zhang, ; Zhenshan Ding,
| | - Zhenshan Ding
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Guan Zhang, ; Zhenshan Ding,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ha JS, Jeon J, Ko JC, Lee HS, Yang J, Kim D, Kim JS, Ham WS, Choi YD, Cho KS. Intravesical Recurrence after Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Is Associated with Flexible Diagnostic Ureteroscopy, but Not with Rigid Diagnostic Ureteroscopy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225629. [PMID: 36428721 PMCID: PMC9688462 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: We assessed the impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) on intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma according to the type of URS. (2) Methods: Data on 491 consecutive patients who underwent RNU at two institutions between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The study population was classified according to the type of URS performed before RNU as follows: non-URS, rigid URS, and flexible URS. The study outcome was IVR occurring within 1 year of RNU. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of IVR. (3) Results: Altogether, 396 patients were included for analysis. Rigid and flexible URS were performed in 178 (45%) and 111 (28%) patients, respectively, while 107 (27%) patients did not undergo URS. IVR was identified in 99 (25%) patients. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that the flexible URS group was significantly associated with increased IVR, compared to the non-URS group (HR = 1.807, p = 0.0416). No significant difference in IVR was observed between the non-URS and rigid URS groups (HR = 1.301, p = 0.3388). (4) Conclusions: In patients with UTUC undergoing RNU, rigid URS may not increase the risk of IVR, whereas flexible URS appears to be associated with a higher risk of IVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Soo Ha
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Urological Science Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinhyung Jeon
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Urological Science Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Cheol Ko
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Urological Science Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Sun Lee
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Juyeon Yang
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Daeho Kim
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Urological Science Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea
| | - June Seok Kim
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Urological Science Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Sik Ham
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Deuk Choi
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Kang Su Cho
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Urological Science Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea
- Center of Evidence Based Medicine, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-2-2019-3471
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Culpan M, Cakici MC, Keser F, Yigit Yalcin M, Kargi T, Kayar R, Abay E, Ozenc G, Kumcu A, Pehlivanoglu M, Turk S, Kisa E, Sahin S, Ishak Ozturk M, Otunctemur A, Sobay R, Cihan Demirel H, Yilmaz O, Atis G, Imamoglu MA, Yildirim A, Yildirim A. Biopsy with Ureterorenoscopy Before Radical Nephroureterectomy is Associated with Increased Intravesical Recurrence in Urothelial Cancer Located in the Kidney. Turk J Urol 2022; 48:431-439. [PMID: 36416333 PMCID: PMC9797743 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2022.22143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diagnostic ureterorenoscopy is used to identify upper tract urothelial cancer before radical nephro ureterectomy, especially for uncertain lesions in imaging modalities or urine cytology. However, diagnostic ureterorenoscopy can potentially cause intravesical tumor spillage and can increase intravesical recurrence rates. We aimed to investigate the impact of diagnostic ureterorenoscopy before radical nephroureterectomy, with and without biopsy, on intravesical recurrence rates of patients with upper tract urothelial cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with localized upper tract urothelial cancer from 8 different tertiary referral centers, who underwent radical nephroureterectomy between 2001 and 2020, were included. Three groups were made: no URS (group 1); diagnostic ureterorenoscopy without biopsy (group 2); and diagnostic ure terorenoscopy with biopsy (group 3). Intravesical recurrence rates and survival outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the factors that were asso ciated with intravesical recurrence-free survival. RESULTS Twenty-two (20.8%), 10 (24.4%), and 23 (39%) patients experienced intravesical recurrence in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P=.037) among 206 patients. The 2-year intravesical recurrence-free sur vival rate was 83.1%, 82.4%, and 69.2%, for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P=.004). Cancer-specific survival and overall survival were comparable (P=.560 and P=.803, respectively). Diagnostic ureterore noscopy+biopsy (hazard ratio: 6.88, 95% CI: 2.41-19.65, P < .001) was the only independent predictor of intravesical recurrence in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer located in the kidney, according to tumor location. CONCLUSION Diagnostic ureterorenoscopy+biopsy before radical nephroureterectomy significantly increased the rates of intravesical recurrence in tumors located in kidney. This result suggests tumor spillage with this type of biopsy, so further studies with different biopsy options or without biopsy can be designed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meftun Culpan
- Department of Urology, İstanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Caglar Cakici
- Department of Urology, İstanbul Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ferhat Keser
- Department of Urology, İstanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey,Corresponding author:Ferhat KeserE-mail:
| | - Mehmet Yigit Yalcin
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Taner Kargi
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Rıdvan Kayar
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Erdal Abay
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğulu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Gorkem Ozenc
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Kumcu
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Pehlivanoglu
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Semih Turk
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Erdem Kisa
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Sahin
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Metin Ishak Ozturk
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Haydarpaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Alper Otunctemur
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğulu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Resul Sobay
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Cihan Demirel
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Omer Yilmaz
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Atis
- Department of Urology, İstanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Muhammet Abdurrahim Imamoglu
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Asif Yildirim
- Department of Urology, İstanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yonese I, Ito M, Waseda Y, Kobayashi S, Toide M, Takazawa R, Koga F. Adverse Prognostic Impact of Diagnostic Ureterorenoscopy in a Subset of Patients with High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephroureterectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163962. [PMID: 36010955 PMCID: PMC9406558 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: We hypothesized that diagnostic ureterorenoscopy (URS) may adversely affect prognosis in a subset of patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods: The present retrospective study included 143 patients with UTUC treated between 2010 and 2021 at two tertiary care hospitals, of whom 79 received URS prior to RNU. Subgroups were stratified by clinicopathological variables relevant to prognosis. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the prognostic impact of URS on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after RNU. Results: During follow-up (median 54 months for survivors), 32 cases of all-cause mortality and 40 cases of progression were recorded. No significant difference was found in OS or PFS between patients with and without URS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that URS was significantly associated with worse OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.008) in 29 patients with non-papillary and ≥pT3 UTUC. Importantly, URS did not have any adverse effects on prognosis in 62 patients with papillary and ≤pT2 UTUC (p = 0.005). Conclusions: URS may adversely affect prognosis of UTUC patients, specifically non-papillary and ≥pT3 disease. URS may better be avoided in patients with high-risk UTUC features unless URS is necessary to diagnose UTUC. This study also corroborates the oncological safety of URS in those with low-risk UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Yonese
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan
| | - Masaya Ito
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan
| | - Yuma Waseda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtuska Hospital, Tokyo 170-8476, Japan
| | - Shuichiro Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan
| | - Masahiro Toide
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan
| | - Ryoji Takazawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtuska Hospital, Tokyo 170-8476, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Koga
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-3-3823-2101
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li CC, Chang CH, Huang CP, Hong JH, Huang CY, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Lo CW, Yu CC, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Wu WC, Chung SD, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chen YT, Chen SH, Jiang YH, Tsai YC, Chiang BJ, Lin WY, Jou YC, Wu CC, Lee HY, Yeh HC. Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:731460. [PMID: 34671556 PMCID: PMC8522474 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes and surgical complications of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with different minimally invasive techniques for nephroureterectomy. Methods From the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group, a total of 3,333 UTUC patients were identified. After excluding ineligible cases, we retrospectively included 1,340 patients from 15 institutions who received hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (HALNU), laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) or robotic nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2001 and 2021. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze the survival outcomes, and binary logistic regression model was selected to compare the risks of postoperative complications of different surgical approaches. Results Among the enrolled patients, 741, 458 and 141 patients received HALNU, LNU and RNU, respectively. Compared with RNU (41.1%) and LNU (32.5%), the rate of lymph node dissection in HALNU was the lowest (17.4%). In both Kaplan-Meier and univariate analysis, the type of surgery was significantly associated with overall and cancer-specific survival. The statistical significance of surgical methods on survival outcomes remained in multivariate analysis, where patients undergoing HALNU appeared to have the worst overall (p = 0.007) and cancer-specific (p = 0.047) survival rates among the three groups. In all analyses, the surgical approach was not related to bladder recurrence. In addition, HALNU was significantly associated with longer hospital stay (p = 0.002), and had the highest risk of major Clavien-Dindo complications (p = 0.011), paralytic ileus (p = 0.012), and postoperative end-stage renal disease (p <0.001). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery can be safe and feasible. We proved that compared with the HALNU group, the LNU and RNU groups have better survival rates and fewer surgical complications. It is crucial to uphold strict oncological principles with sophisticated technique to improve outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Chia Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Hua Hong
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Graduate Program in Biomedical Informatics, College of Informatics, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Hong Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yeong-Chin Jou
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
The Impact of Diagnostic Ureteroscopy Prior to Radical Nephroureterectomy on Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10184197. [PMID: 34575307 PMCID: PMC8465597 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10184197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The incidence of intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is reported in up to 50% of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). It was suggested that preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) could increase the IVR rate after RNU. However, the available data are often conflicting. Thus, in this systematic review and meta-analysis we sought to synthesize available data for the impact of pre-RNU URS for UTUC on IVR and other oncological outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in June 2021. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were conducted. The primary endpoint was intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), with the secondary endpoints being cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Results: Among a total of 5489 patients included in the sixteen selected papers, 2387 (43.4%) underwent diagnostic URS before RNU and 3102 (56.6%) did not. Pre-RNU diagnostic URS was significantly associated with worse IVRFS after RNU (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.29–1.61, p < 0.001) than RNU alone. However, subgroup analysis including patients without biopsy during URS revealed no significant impact of diagnostic URS on IVRFS (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.90–1.80, p = 0.16). The results of other analyses showed no significant differences in CSS (HR = 0.94, p = 0.63), OS (HR: 0.94, p = 0.56), and MFS (HR: 0.91, p = 0.37) between patients who underwent URS before RNU and those who did not. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis confirm that diagnostic URS prior to RNU is significantly associated with worse IVRFS, albeit with no concurrent impact on the other long-term survival outcomes. Our results indicate that URS has a negative impact on IVRFS only when combined with endoscopic biopsy. Future studies are warranted to assess the role of immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy in patients undergoing biopsy during URS for suspected UTUC.
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen H, Wang M, Weng T, Wei Y, Yang L, Ren K, Tang Z, Gou X. Prognostic Analysis of Diagnostic Ureteroscopic Biopsy for Intravesical Recurrence of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urol Int 2021; 106:186-194. [PMID: 34492655 DOI: 10.1159/000517789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate whether diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) biopsy is unfavourable for bladder tumour recurrence in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 195 patients diagnosed with UTUC, who were divided into a diagnostic URS group (URS+) and a nondiagnostic URS group (URS-) according to whether diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy was performed. A Cox regression model was used to analyse the risk factors for intravesical recurrence (IVR)-free survival (IRFS) and overall survival (OS) in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the influence of factors on the incidence of IVR and the cumulative survival rate of UTUC. RESULTS Patients with a maximum tumour diameter of less than 3.1 cm, low-stage tumours, and ureteral tumours were more likely to undergo diagnostic URS before radical surgery. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumour pathological stage and diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy can be used as predictors of IVR after RNU (p = 0.019, 0.033). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis found that diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy was a high-risk factor for IRFS (p = 0.034). Subcomponent analysis showed that pTa/Tis/T1, pT2, pT3/pT4 stage, and diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy with pTa/Tis/T1 stage were unfavourable for IVR (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION Diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy before RNU should be carefully selected for patients with atypical preoperative UTUC. We believe that intravesical chemotherapy drug perfusion can be used after surgery to prevent IVR if biopsy is unavoidable, but this still requires further prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Chen
- Department of Urology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, China,
| | - Ming Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Tonghui Weng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yu Wei
- Department of Master, The Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lei Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ke Ren
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhaobing Tang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xin Gou
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shsm H, Bright E, Mantle M, Munro N, Fahmy O. Diagnostic Ureteroscopy in CT Urography-Diagnosed Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Delay in Definitive Treatment and Increased Intravesical Recurrence. Cureus 2021; 13:e15775. [PMID: 34295585 PMCID: PMC8291344 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the effect of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) on the delay to surgical treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) detected by imaging and the risk of intravesical recurrence. Materials and methods We undertook a retrospective case-note analysis of all patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (NUU) from November 2012 to July 2019. We identified those who underwent diagnostic ureteroscopy prior to NUU as Group 1 and those who did not undergo diagnostic URS as Group 2. Perioperative and pathological parameters were compared between both groups. Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank analyses were used to compare delay to NUU and the intravesical recurrence (IVR) free survival. Cox regression models were employed to analyze the risk factors of intravesical recurrence. Results Out of 69 patients with a mean age of 71.3 years and a mean follow-up of 48.5 months, 49 (71%) underwent URS while 20 (29%) did not. The mean time between the computerized tomography urography (CTU) and surgery was 86 days with URS and 59 days in the control groups(p=0.007). Intravesical recurrence in year one postoperatively was 28.2 % in the URS group vs 5.9% in the control group (p=0.04). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed improved, yet insignificant, IVR-free survival for the control group (Log-Rank p-value=0.21). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, concomitant bladder carcinoma was an independent risk factor for IVR (HR, 15.01; 95%CI, 3.311 - 68.07; p=0.0004). Intravesical mitomycin-c was a protective factor (HR 0.154; 95%CI 0.025 - 0.922; p=0.040). Conclusion In our retrospective single-unit study, diagnostic ureteroscopy for CTU-detected upper tract urothelial carcinoma delayed definitive surgical treatment. Furthermore, it was associated with a significantly increased risk of early intravesical recurrence. URS can provide useful information and reassurance prior to major surgery but must be used with caution in light of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadi Shsm
- Urology, Cornwall Royal Hospital, Truro, GBR
| | | | - Mark Mantle
- Urology, Cornwall Royal Hospital, Truro, GBR
| | | | - Omar Fahmy
- Urology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MYS
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Endoscopic management versus radical nephroureterectomy for localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma in a high endemic region. Sci Rep 2021; 11:4040. [PMID: 33597574 PMCID: PMC7889610 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83495-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to analyze the clinical and survival differences among patients who underwent the two main treatment modalities, endoscopic ablation and radical nephroureterectomy. This study examined all patients who had undergone endoscopic management and RNU between Jul. 1988 and Mar. 2019 from the Taiwan UTUC registry. The inclusion criteria were low stage UTUC in RNU and all cases in endoscopic managed UTUC with a curative intent. The demographic and clinical characteristics were included for analysis. In total, 84 cases in the endoscopic group and 272 cases in the RNU group were enrolled for final analysis. The median follow-up period were 33.5 and 42.0 months in endoscopic and RNU group, respectively (p = 0.082). Comparison of Kaplan–Meier estimated survival curves between groups, the endoscopic group was associated with similar overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRS) but demonstrated inferior disease free survival (DFS) (p = 0.188 for OS, p = 0.493 for CSS and p < 0.001 for DFS). Endoscopic management of UTUC was as safe as RNU in UTUC endemic region.
Collapse
|
17
|
Territo A, Gallioli A, Meneghetti I, Fontana M, Huguet J, Palou J, Breda A. Diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: friend or foe? Arab J Urol 2021; 19:46-58. [PMID: 33763248 PMCID: PMC7954478 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2021.1883810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The European Association of Urology guidelines recommend offering kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumours. Cystoscopy, urinary cytology, and computed tomography urography (CTU) do not always allow correct disease staging and grading, and sometimes there is even a lack of certainty regarding the diagnosis of UTUC. Diagnostic ureteroscopy (d-URS) may therefore be of crucial importance within the diagnostic framework and fundamental in establishing the appropriate therapeutic approach. Evidence acquisition and synthesis A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Risk of bias was assessed using Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). Overall, from 3791 identified records, 186 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Finally, after a quantitative review of the selected literature, with the full agreement of all authors, 62 studies were considered relevant for this review. Results CTU has a sensitivity and specificity for UTUC of 92% and 95% respectively, but is not able to detect small or flat lesions with adequate accuracy. The sensitivity of voided urinary cytology for UTUC is around 67–76% and ranges from 43% to 78% for selective ureteric urine collection. As no technique offers a diagnosis of certainty, d-URS can allow an increase in diagnostic accuracy. In the present review the pros and cons of d-URS were analysed. This technique may provide additional information in the selection of patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or KSS, distinguishing between normal tissue and low- and high-grade UTUC thanks to the emerging technologies. Conclusions Information obtainable from d-URS and ureteroscopic-guided biopsy can prove extremely valuable when the diagnosis of UTUC is doubtful or KSS is being considered. Notwithstanding concerns remain regarding the potential risk of bladder recurrence, cancer dissemination, and/or delay in radical treatment. Abbreviations: CLE: confocal laser endomicroscopy; CSS: cancer-specific survival; CTU: CT urography; d-URS: diagnostic ureteroscopy; EAU: European Association of Urology; HR: hazard ratio; IMAGE1S: Storz professional imaging enhancement system; IVR: intravesical recurrence; KSS: kidney-sparing surgery; MFS: Metastasis-free survival; NAC: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NBI: narrow-band imaging; OCT: optical coherence tomography; RFS: Recurrence-free survival; RNU: radical nephroureterectomy; ROBINS-I: Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions; URS(-GB): Ureteroscopy(-guided biopsy); UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma; UUT: upper urinary tract
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Territo
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Iacopo Meneghetti
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matteo Fontana
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Huguet
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Risk Stratification of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma for Kidney-Sparing Surgery. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
19
|
Abstract
While radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold-standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a growing volume of literature surrounding endoscopic, organ-sparing procedures has developed over the past few decades. Based on this, endoscopic management of UTUC has gained acceptance as a standard of care approach, particularly among those with low-risk disease or with imperative indications for organ preservation. As a rare disease, however, data is mostly restricted to retrospective single institution series with relatively small numbers. Therefore, comparative outcomes of endoscopic management to RNU remain incompletely defined. Furthermore, the comparative utility of endoscopic approaches (ureteroscopy versus percutaneous resection) and topical therapy following resection lacks prospective analysis. In this article we review the available literature on endoscopic management of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Knoedler
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol 2020; 79:62-79. [PMID: 32593530 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 480] [Impact Index Per Article: 120.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
|
21
|
Jiang Y, Yao Z, Zhu X, Wu B, Bai S. Risk factors and oncological outcome for intravesical recurrence in organ-confined upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients after radical nephroureterectomy: A propensity score-matched case control study. Int J Surg 2020; 76:28-34. [PMID: 32081714 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the primary treatment strategy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, the prognosis is poor and recurrences are common. The risk factors for intravesical recurrence (IVR) remain inconsistent and unclear. Thus, we have identified the risk factors for IVR in patients with organ-confined UTUC. METHODS We retrospectively studied 229 patients with UTUC who underwent RNU combined with bladder cuff resection at our center between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. After propensity score-matching, 204 patients were included in our study. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, and peri-operative data were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were measured using the Kaplan-Meier curve with a log-rank test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Of the 229 patients, 42 (18.3%) had IVR after 40 months (range, 24-56 months) follow-up. In the matched group, the independent risk factors for IVR were tumor diameter (HR = 2.690, p = 0.038) and tumor stage (T3 vs. T1, HR = 3.363, p = 0.019; T2 vs. T1, HR = 2.835, p = 0.022). OS and CSS were poor in patients with IVR than patients without IVR (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In this propensity score-matched case-control study, tumor diameter and tumor stage were shown to be independent risk factors for IVR in patients with organ-confined UTUC. Moreover, patients with IVR had poor prognosis than patients without IVR. Thus, more active postoperative surveillance and treatment strategies should be adopted for these patients, which may help improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunzhong Jiang
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| | - Zichuan Yao
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| | - Xianqing Zhu
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| | - Song Bai
- Department of Urology, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chung Y, Lee DH, Lee M, Kim H, Lee S, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee SE, Oh JJ. Impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy before radical nephroureterectomy on intravesical recurrence in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer. Investig Clin Urol 2020; 61:158-165. [PMID: 32158966 PMCID: PMC7052419 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.2.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy performed before radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) on intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Materials and Methods From May 2003 to December 2018, patients who underwent RNU for UTUC were enrolled and divided into two groups according to whether they underwent preoperative ureteroscopy (Pre-U vs. Non-U). We excluded patients who had a history of bladder cancer and did not receive bladder cuff resection during surgery. Perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups by use of t-tests or chi-square tests. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess the association between Pre-U and IVR. Results Of the 453 total patients, 226 patients (49.9%, Pre-U group) had received diagnostic ureteroscopy before RNU, and 227 patients (50.1%, Non-U group) had not. IVR occurred in 99 patients (43.8%) in the Pre-U group and 61 patients (26.9%) in the Non-U group (p=0.001). The median time to recurrence was 107 months. The 5-year IVR-free survival rates were 56.2% and 73.1% in the Pre-U and Non-U groups, respectively (log rank test, p<0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that Pre-U was a significant factor (hazard ratio, 1.413; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–1.965; p=0.040) after adjustment for other factors including tumor stage, location, etc. Conclusions Preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy before RNU was a significant factor for IVR. Therefore, we should carefully consider Pre-U before RNU for nonobvious ureteral lesions. These results should be validated in a prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Younsoo Chung
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Dong Hwan Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Minseung Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hakju Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sangchul Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sung Kyu Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.,Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Soo Byun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.,Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Eun Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jong Jin Oh
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.,Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Diagnosis, management, and follow-up of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an interdisciplinary collaboration between urology and radiology. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:3893-3905. [PMID: 31701194 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02293-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a common and lethal malignancy. Patients diagnosed with this illness often face invasive workups, morbid therapies, and prolonged post-operative surveillance. UTUC represents approximately 5-10% of urothelial malignancies in the United States and affect 4600-7800 new patients annually. Various environmental exposures as well as smoking have been implicated in the development of UTUC. The diagnosis and workup of UTUC relies on heavily on imaging studies, a close working relationship between Urologists and Radiologists, and invasive procedures such as ureteroscopy. Treatments range from renal-sparing endoscopic surgery to radical extirpative surgery depending on the specific clinical situation. Follow-up is crucial as UTUC has a high recurrence rate. Here we review the epidemiology, diagnosis, management strategies, and follow-up of UTUC from an interdisciplinary perspective.
Collapse
|
24
|
Ma RZ, Xia HZ, Lu M, Zhang ZY, Zhang QM, Lu J, Wang GL, Ma LL. [Impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy and biopsy on radical nephroureterectomy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. JOURNAL OF PEKING UNIVERSITY. HEALTH SCIENCES 2019; 51:665-672. [PMID: 31420619 DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167x.2019.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy and biopsy (UB) on radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS The clinical data of UTUC patients receiving RNU between Jan. 2007 and Dec. 2016 were retrospectively collected. The median follow up time was 40 months. The operation time and blood loss of RNU were compared between UB group and non-UB group. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the time interval between UB and RNU, and surgery methods of lower ureter. The linear regression model was used to adjust for other common factors that impacted operation time. RESULTS A total of 163 UTUC patients were included in the final analysis. For the lower ureter, open ureterectomies were performed in 91 patients (55.9%), while retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomies were performed in 72 patients (44.1%). A total of 110 (67.5%) patients received preoperative UB. Compared with non-UB group, the average operation time of UB group was significantly longer [(252.5±79.8) min vs. (221.3±79.8) min, P=0.019], but no difference of blood loss was found (median, 50 mL vs. 50 mL, P=0.143). In subgroup analysis, the average operation time of RNU was significantly prolonged when RNU was performed after 1 week of UB (P=0.023). Meanwhile, the median blood loss of RNU increased significantly when it was done after 2 weeks of UB compared with non-UB group (100 mL vs. 50 mL, P=0.012). UB was also significantly prolonged the operation time of RNU in retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomy group (P=0.012). In multivariable analysis, UB (P=0.049), ≥pT3 (P=0.039), pN+ (P=0.018) and ureterectomy method (P=0.005) were independent risk factors of prolonged operation time. The 3-year cancer specific survival (CSS) rate was 87.2% in our cohort. UB had no significant impact on cancer specific survival (P=0.435). CONCLUSION UB was an independent risk factor of prolonged RNU time, but did not significantly influence cancer specific survival of upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Z Ma
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - H Z Xia
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - M Lu
- Department of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Z Y Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Q M Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - J Lu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - G L Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - L L Ma
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Glybochko PV, Enikeev D, Rouprêt M, Fajkovic H, Seebacher V, Shariat SF. Risk stratification of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A Review of the Current Literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:503-513. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1621753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Teheran, Iran
| | - Petr V. Glybochko
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Veronika Seebacher
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|