A population-based predictive model to identify patients with signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach who are most suitable for primary tumor resection

The effect of surgery and metastatic risk prediction in patients with gastrointestinal tract signet-ring cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of surgery as a treatment option for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) in the gastrointestinal tract (GI-SRCC).

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, patients with GI-SRCC who underwent surgery or received nonsurgical treatment were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance baseline characteristics and reduce bias. Overall survival (OS) was calculated in matching cohorts to estimate prognosis for patients with GI-SRCC. Nomogram was established to predict metastasis for patients with GI-SRCC.

RESULTS

The study enrolled a total of 9428 patients with GI-SRCC, with 1689 patients in the nonsurgery group and 7739 patients in the surgery group. After 1:1 PSM, we analyzed 743 patients from each group. Our survival analyses revealed that surgery independently correlated with improved OS for patients with GI-SRCC (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.33-0.42; P < .001). Subgroup analysis further confirmed the positive impact of surgery on the prognosis of patients with nonmetastatic GI-SRCC. Notably, distinct subsets of patients with metastasis, particularly those originating from the upper GI (esophagus, proximal stomach, and distal stomach) and left colon, demonstrated a significant improvement in OS after surgery. However, no significant survival difference was observed for patients with metastatic right colon and rectum SRCC. Using nomogram, we quantitatively assessed the risk of metastasis in patients with right colon and rectum SRCC, which exhibited robust predictive accuracy, with area under the curve values of 0.829.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlighted surgery's positive impact on prognosis for both patients with nonmetastatic and metastatic upper GI-SRCC and left colon SRCC. Hence, we recommend surgery as a treatment option for these groups. In addition, for patients with metastatic right colon and rectum SRCC ineligible for surgery, our predictive nomogram can offer a convenient tool to aid early intervention and improve prognosis.

Effects of Tumor Localization, Age, and Stage on the Outcomes of Gastric and Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinomas

Signet ring cell adenocarcinomas (SRCCs) are a rare histological adenocarcinoma subtype, classically thought to have a worse prognosis than conventional adenocarcinomas. The majority of these cancers occur in the stomach, colon, and rectum. Their rarity means that most epidemiological studies into their pathology are often underpowered, and interpretations from these reports are mixed. In this study, we use the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database to examine the effects of tumor localization, age, and stage on gastric and colorectal cancer outcomes. For early onset localized and regional gastric cancers, SRCCs have the same overall risk of mortality compared to conventional adenocarcinomas. Over the age of 50 years, SRCCs have worse outcomes across all stages. Gastric SRCCs are 2-3-fold more likely in younger patients, and more heavily favor the distal stomach. Like conventional adenocarcinomas, proximal gastric SRCCs have decreased survival. Across all ages, stages, and locations, colorectal SRCCs have worse outcomes. SRCCs favor the right colon, but outcomes are significantly worse for the left colon and rectal cancers. Relative to adenocarcinomas, colorectal SRCCs have the worst outcomes in younger patients. Overall, these results provide insights into SRCC disease patterns that cannot be surmised outside of population-level data.

Comparison between signet-ring cell carcinoma and non-signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: clinicopathological parameters, epidemiological data, outcome, and prognosis-a cohort study of 123 patients from a non-endemic country

Background

Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach (SRCC) is a particular gastric cancer entity. Its incidence is increasing. Its diagnosis is pathological; it corresponds to adenocarcinoma with a majority of signet-ring cells component (> 50%).

These histological features give it its aggressiveness characteristics. This has repercussions on the prognostic level and implications for the alternatives of therapy, especially since some authors suggest a potential chemoresistance.

This survey aimed to identify the epidemiological, pathological, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics of SRCC as a separate disease entity.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 123 patients admitted for gastric adenocarcinoma to Habib Thameur Hospital in Tunis over 11 years from January 2006 to December 2016. A comparative study was performed between 2 groups: the SRCC group with 62 patients and the non-SRCC (non-signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach) with 61 patients.

Results

The prevalence of SRCC in our series was 50%. SRCC affected significantly younger patients (55 vs 62 years; p = 0.004). The infiltrative character was more common in SRCC tumors (30.6 vs 14.8%; p = 0.060), whereas the budding character was more often noted in non-SRCC tumors (78.7 vs 58.1%; p = 0.039). There was no significant difference in tumor localization between both groups. Linitis plastica was noted in 14 patients with SRCC against a single patient with non-SRCC (p = 0.001). The tumor size was more important in the non-SRCC group (6.84 vs 6.39 cm; p = 0.551). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was noted in 4.3% of cases in the SRCC group versus 2.2% of cases in the NSRCC group (p = 0.570). Total gastrectomy was more often performed in the SRCC group (87 vs 56%; p = 0.001). Resection was more often curative in the non-SRCC group (84.4 vs 78.3%; p = 0.063). Postoperative chemotherapy was more commonly indicated in the SRCC group (67.4 vs 53.3%; p = 0.339). Tumor recurrence was more common in the non-SRCC group (35.7 vs 32%; p = 0.776). The most common type of recurrence was peritoneal carcinomatosis in the SRCC group (62.5%) and hepatic metastasis in the non-SRCC group (60%; p = 0.096). The overall 5-year survival in the SRCC group was lower than in the non-SRCC group, with no statistically significant difference (47.1 vs 51.5%; p = 0.715). The overall survival was more important for SRCC in early cancer (100 vs 80%; p = 0.408), whereas it was higher for non-SRCC in advanced cancer (48.1 vs 41.9%; p = 0.635).

Conclusion

Apart from its epidemiological and pathological features, SRCC seems to have a worse prognosis. Indeed, it is diagnosed at a more advanced stage and has a worse prognosis in advanced cancer than non-SRCC. It is therefore to be considered as a particular entity of gastric adenocarcinoma requiring a specific therapeutic protocol where the place of chemotherapy remains to be more investigated.