Clinical implication of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with right-sided colon cancer after complete mesocolic excision: a propensity score-matched analysis

Significance of preoperative evaluation of modified advanced lung cancer inflammation index for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Body composition and systemic inflammation/nutrition have been identified as important clinical factors in cancer patients. The modified advanced lung cancer inflammation index (mALI), which combines body composition and systemic inflammation/nutrition, is defined as appendicular skeletal muscle index × serum albumin/neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. This retrospective study aimed to investigate associations between preoperative mALI and surgical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We examined 665 patients with resectable stage I-III NSCLC who underwent pulmonary resection. Patients were divided into low-mALI (n = 168) and high-mALI (n = 497) based on the lower quartile. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the prognostic value of mALI. We then performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for high- and low-mALI to further investigate impacts on survival.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were both significantly poorer in the low-mALI group than in the high-mALI group (58.2% vs. 79.6%, P < 0.001; 48.8% vs. 66.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed low-mALI as an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.116; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.458-3.070; P < 0.001) and RFS (HR, 1.634; 95% CI 1.210-2.207; P = 0.001). After PSM, low-mALI remained as an independent predictor of OS (HR, 2.446; 95% CI 1.263-4.738; P = 0.008) and RFS (HR 1.835; 95% CI 1.074-3.137; P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative mALI appears to offer an independent predictor of poor surgical outcomes as a simple, routinely available, and inexpensive biomarker in patients with resectable NSCLC.

Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index: A Novel Comprehensive Biomarker of Host Status for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Numerous biomarkers that reflect host status have been identified for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there has been a paucity of biomarker studies that comprehensively indicate body composition, nutritional assessment, and systemic inflammation status. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), initially introduced as a screening tool for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in 2013, emerges as a holistic marker encompassing all body composition, nutritional status, and systemic inflammation status. The index is calculated by the simple formula: body mass index × albumin value / neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Given its accessibility in routine clinical practice, the ALI has exhibited promising clinical utility in prognosticating outcomes for patients with multiple types of cancer. In this review, we focus on the significance of host status and the clinical applicability of the ALI in the treatment and management of patients with malignancies, including mCRC. We also suggest its potential in guiding the formulation of treatment strategies against mCRC and outline future perspectives.

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index is a prognostic factor for gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) is a comprehensive assessment indicator that can reflect inflammation and nutrition conditions. However, there are some controversies about whether ALI is an independent prognostic factor for gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. Thus, we aimed to clarify its prognostic value and explore the potential mechanisms.

METHODS

Four databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI were used for searching eligible studies from inception to June 28, 2022. All gastrointestinal cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), esophageal cancer (EC), liver cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancer were enrolled for analysis. We focused on prognosis most in the current meta-analysis. Survival indicators, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-special survival (CSS) were compared between the high ALI group and the low ALI group. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was submitted as a supplementary document.

RESULTS

We finally included fourteen studies involving 5091 patients in this meta-analysis. After pooling the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), ALI was found to be an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR = 2.09, I² = 92%, 95% CI = 1.53 to 2.85, P < 0.01), DFS (HR = 1.48, I² = 83%, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.87, P < 0.01), and CSS (HR = 1.28, I² = 1%, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.60, P = 0.03) in gastrointestinal cancer. After subgroup analysis, we found that ALI was still closely related to OS for CRC (HR = 2.26, I² = 93%, 95% CI = 1.53 to 3.32, P < 0.01) and GC (HR = 1.51, I² = 40%, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.04, P = 0.006) patients. As for DFS, ALI also has a predictive value on the prognosis of CRC (HR = 1.54, I² = 85%, 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.07, P = 0.005) and GC (HR = 1.37, I² = 0%, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.73, P = 0.007) patients.

CONCLUSION

ALI affected gastrointestinal cancer patients in terms of OS, DFS, and CSS. Meanwhile, ALI was a prognostic factor both for CRC and GC patients after subgroup analysis. Patients with low ALI had poorer prognoses. We recommended that surgeons should perform aggressive interventions in patients with low ALI before the operation.

The prognostic value of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation is crucial for the development and progression of cancers. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) is considered to be a better indicator of systemic inflammation than current biomarkers. However, the prognostic value of the ALI in gastrointestinal neoplasms remains unclear. We performed the first meta-analysis to explore the association between ALI and gastrointestinal oncologic outcomes to help physicians better evaluate the prognosis of those patients.

METHODS

Eligible articles were retrieved using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar by December 29, 2022. Clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 18 articles with 6898 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that a low ALI was correlated with poor OS (HR = 1.914, 95% CI: 1.514-2.419, P < 0.001), DFS (HR = 1.631, 95% CI: 1.197-2.224, P = 0.002), and PFS (HR = 1.679, 95% CI: 1.073-2.628, P = 0.023) of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Subgroup analysis revealed that a low ALI was associated with shorter OS (HR = 2.279, 95% CI: 1.769-2.935, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 1.631, 95% CI: 1.197-2.224, P = 0.002), and PFS (HR = 1.911, 95% CI: 1.517-2.408, P = 0.002) of patients with colorectal cancer. However, the ALI was not related to CSS in the patients with gastrointestinal malignancy (HR = 1.121, 95% CI: 0.694-1.812, P = 0.640). Sensitivity analysis supported the stability and dependability of the above results.

CONCLUSION

The pre-treatment ALI was a useful predictor of prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancers.

Prognostic value of pan-immune-inflammation value in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) has been reported as a novel prognostic biomarker in multiple malignancies. The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of the PIV in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

We comprehensively searched electronic databases including PubMed, Embase and Web of Science up to August 2022. The endpoints were survival outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for survival data were collected for analysis.

Results

Six studies including 1879 participants were included. A significant heterogeneity in the PIV cut-off value among studies was observed. The combined results indicated that patients in the high baseline PIV group had a worse overall survival (HR=2.09; 95%CI: 1.67-2.61; P<0.0001; I^{2 =} 7%) and progression-free survival (HR=1.82; 95%CI: 1.49-2.22; P<0.0001; I^{2 =} 15%). In addition, early PIV increase after treatment initiation was significantly associated with decreased overall survival (HR=1.79; 95%CI: 1.13-2.93; P=0.01; I^{2 =} 26%), and a trend toward poor progression-free survival (HR=2.00; 95%CI: 0.90-4.41; P=0.09; I^{2 =} 70%).

Conclusion

Based on existing evidence, the PIV could act as a valuable prognostic index in patients with colorectal cancer. However, the heterogeneity in the PIV cut-off value among studies should be considered when interpreting these findings.