Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Consistent and Continuously Evolving Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Since its introduction in 1977, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has widely been accepted treatment for unresectable intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Conventional TACE (c-TACE) uses an emulsion of chemotherapeutic agent and ethiodized oil with subsequent embolization of the feeding artery using gelatin sponge. Drug eluting beads (DEB) were introduced in clinical practice in the 2000s and have since been used as an alternative to c-TACE with better outcomes, especially in larger tumors. Considering the widespread use of TACE in HCC, it is important to revisit the current knowledge and the advances that have developed for better safety and efficacy. This article aims to emphasize on the current knowledge and importance of TACE, touch upon the technical aspects including post-TACE care, response assessment, and discontinuation strategies and highlight the recent advances in the technology, catheters, and embolization particles. Thus, despite a rapid change in treatment algorithms and availability of newer drugs for HCC, TACE will remain an integral part of HCC treatment alone or in combination with other therapies.

Advancements in locoregional therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Emerging perspectives on combined treatment strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) persists as a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, often diagnosed at advanced stages with limited treatment options. Locoregional therapies (LRTs) are crucial in HCC management, playing significant roles in neoadjuvant and palliative treatments, among others. However, the unique disease background of HCC necessitates multidisciplinary and integrated treatment strategies. The therapeutic landscape for advanced HCC has been significantly broadened by the advent of combined therapies, presenting multiple approaches aimed at improving long-term survival, which remains a critical challenge. This review offers a comprehensive overview of major LRTs for HCC, highlighting recent technological advancements and exploring the challenges and limitations in their application, and presents the latest developments in combination therapies, including combinations between different LRTs and their integration with systemic treatments. Additionally, we outline future directions for the development of integrated treatment modalities for advanced HCC.

Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety between D-TACE + HAIC + lenvatinib and D-TACE + lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib in patients with massive hepatocellular carcinoma, with the goal of providing a safer and more effective therapeutic strategy for individuals suffering from massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data from 118 patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent treatment at the Interventional Department of Wuhan Union Hospital between June 2018 and December 2021. Based on the treatment approach, the patients were divided into two groups: the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group (N = 54) and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (N = 64). The primary study endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups. Additionally, the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events in both groups was considered as a secondary study endpoint.

RESULTS

Following the treatment, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR compared to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (68.5% vs. 43.8%, 90.7% vs. 73.4%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group demonstrated longer mPFS and mOS in comparison to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (8.6 months vs. 6.6 months, P = 0.005; 19.5 months vs. 14.1 months, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of common treatment-related adverse events between the TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy and safety in managing unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma. This combination therapy may serve as a viable option for improving the prognosis of patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

Research progress on machine algorithm prediction of liver cancer prognosis after intervention therapy

The treatment for liver cancer has transitioned from traditional surgical resection to interventional therapies, which have become increasingly popular among patients due to their minimally invasive nature and significant local efficacy. However, with advancements in treatment technologies, accurately assessing patient response and predicting long-term survival has become a crucial research topic. Over the past decade, machine algorithms have made remarkable progress in the medical field, particularly in hepatology and prognosis studies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Machine algorithms, including deep learning and machine learning, can identify prognostic patterns and trends by analyzing vast amounts of clinical data. Despite significant advancements, several issues remain unresolved in the prognosis prediction of liver cancer using machine algorithms. Key challenges and main controversies include effectively integrating multi-source clinical data to improve prediction accuracy, addressing data privacy and ethical concerns, and enhancing the transparency and interpretability of machine algorithm decision-making processes. This paper aims to systematically review and analyze the current applications and potential of machine algorithms in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing interventional therapy for liver cancer, providing theoretical and empirical support for future research and clinical practice.

Current research status of transarterial therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

With continuous advancements in interventional radiology, considerable progress has been made in transarterial therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent years, and an increasing number of research papers on transarterial therapies for HCC have been published. In this editorial, we comment on the article by Ma et al published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastro intestinal Oncology: "Efficacy and predictive factors of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibition for unresectable HCC". We focus specifically on the current research status and future directions of transarterial therapies. In the future, more studies are needed to determine the optimal transarterial local treatment for HCC. With the emergence of checkpoint immunotherapy modalities, it is expected that the results of trials of transarterial local therapy combined with systemic therapy will bring new hope to HCC patients.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization alone compared to its combination with anlotinib among patients with intermediate or advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial

Background

Anlotinib hydrochloride is a potent oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, and PDGFR α/β, demonstrating significant antiangiogenic activity. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the effective treatment for intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which remains a major global health challenge. This study evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of combining anlotinib with TACE against the standard TACE monotherapy among patients with intermediate or advanced HCC.

Methods

This phase II randomized controlled trial included 38 patients diagnosed with intermediate or advanced HCC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either TACE in combination with anlotinib or TACE alone. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. This trial aimed to determine whether the addition of anlotinib could extend PFS and improve other clinical outcomes compared to TACE alone.

Results

The median PFS for patients treated with TACE and anlotinib was significantly longer at 11.04 months compared to 6.87 months in the TACE-alone group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46; P=0.02], indicating a robust enhancement in disease management. Although the median OS was not reached at the time of analysis, early trends suggest potential improvement. Both treatment groups had comparable ORR and DCR, demonstrating effective disease control. The safety profile of the combined treatment was manageable, with side effects similar in nature to those observed with TACE alone but not significantly more severe, thus maintaining patient quality of life.

Conclusions

The addition of anlotinib to TACE appears to provide a safe and effective therapeutic benefit for patients with intermediate or advanced-stage HCC. However, longer follow-up is needed for a more comprehensive efficacy assessment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04066543.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy versus with targeted monotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The application of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with targeted therapy and immunotherapy (TACE-T-I) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has gained increasing attention. However, there are variations in the efficacy and safety outcomes between TACE-T-I versus TACE combined with targeted drugs (TACE-T). This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE-T-I versus TACE-T in unresectable HCC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to August 21, 2023, for comparative studies on TACE-T-I versus TACE-T for unresectable HCC. Outcome measures included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). OS was the primary outcome of this study. Weighted mean difference (WMD) or hazard ratio (HR) was used as the pooled statistic for OS and PFS. Relative risk (RR) was employed as the pooled statistic for ORR, DCR and the incidence of TRAEs. And 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all effect measures. Data analysis was conducted using Stata 14.0 software.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 14 studies with 2144 patients. The pooled results showed that compared with patients in the TACE-T group, patients in the TACE-T-I group had higher ORR (RR = 1.61; 95%CI: 1.38-1.89) and DCR (RR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.09-1.26). Patients in the TACE-T-I group experienced prolonged PFS (WMD = 3.08; 95%CI: 2.63-3.53) and OS (WMD = 5.76; 95%CI: 4.68-6.84). And the risk of disease progression (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.37-0.55) and death (HR = 0.43; 95%CI: 0.38-0.49) was lower in the TACE-T-I group. Common TRAEs included fever, pain, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, elevated ALT, elevated AST, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, proteinuria, and diarrhea. The incidence and severity of TRAEs in the TACE-T-I group were similar to those in the TACE-T group, with no significant differences (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that, on the basis of TACE combined with targeted therapy, the addition of immunotherapy provides better clinical efficacy and survival benefits for unresectable HCC patients, with good tolerability.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) remains an unresolved challenge. There is ongoing debate regarding the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies. The main endpoints under investigation were survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP). Secondary outcomes encompassed tumor response rates and adverse events (AEs). Two researchers conducted the data extraction independently and assessed the quality of the studies. After pooling and analyzing the data, we assessed the heterogeneity and performed both subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. Additionally, we evaluated the potential for publication bias.

RESULTS

Eight studies with 1513 patients were finally retrieved. Compared to monotherapy, although bigeminal therapy exhibited improved survival benefits (OS: HR: 0.56, 95 % CI 0.41-0.76, p < 0.001; TTP: HR: 0.72, 95 % CI 0.59-0.87, p = 0.001) and tumor response (ORR: RR: 1.59; 95 % CI 1.19-2.13, p = 0.002; DCR: RR: 1.14; 95 % CI 1.03-1.26, p = 0.010), the reliability of results was affected by significant heterogeneity. In the subgroup analysis, compared to DEB-TACE alone, the bigeminal therapy failed to show any statistical differences. Compared to TKIs, it demonstrated significant advantages in both survival (OS: HR: 0.49, 95 % CI 0.40-0.61, p < 0.001; TTP: HR: 0.60, 95 % CI 0.48-0.75, p < 0.001) and tumor response (ORR: RR: 2.40, 95 % CI 1.86-3.09, p < 0.001; DCR: RR: 1.36, 95 % CI 1.20-1.54, p < 0.001) while low heterogeneity was observed. Concerning safety, DEB-TACE provides no more severe AEs while TKIs-related AEs require close monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that DEB-TACE combined with TKIs may be a safe and effective treatment for uHCC, which is more suitable for patients in the advanced stage.

Influence of transcatheter arterial embolization on symptom distress and fatigue in liver cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent malignancy, and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has emerged as a pivotal therapeutic modality. However, TAE may induce symptom distress and fatigue, adversely affecting the quality of life of patients.

AIM

To investigate symptom distress, fatigue, and associated factors in HCC patients undergoing TAE.

METHODS

We used a cross-sectional design and purposive sampling to enroll HCC patients who underwent TAE at our institution from January to December 2022. Questionnaires were utilized to collect data on symptom distress and fatigue scores from the first to the third day after TAE.

RESULTS

Our study revealed a significant reduction in fatigue and symptom distress among patients after TAE. Pain, fatigue, insomnia, fever and abdominal distension were the most common symptoms troubling patients during the first 3 d post-TAE. Marital status, presence of family support, physical functional status, age, and symptom distress were identified as predictors of fatigue in patients.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare professionals should educate HCC patients on symptom distress and fatigue, offering personalized relief strategies to lessen their psychological burden.

Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets predict the efficacy of TACE with or without PD-1 inhibitors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective clinical study

Background

Although peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets, particularly PD-1+ T cells, are promising prognostic indicators for patients with cancer. However, their clinical significance remains unclear.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 157 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with or without PD-1 inhibitors. Twenty peripheral lymphocyte subsets and cytokines were analyzed. We analyzed the differences in PD-1+ T cells between patients treated with and without PD-1 inhibitors and their associations with tumor response, survival prognosis, and clinical features.

Results

We found that the baseline CD8+PD-1+ and CD4+PD-1+ T-cell frequencies in patients who had received PD-1 inhibitors were lower than those in patients who had not received PD-1 inhibitors (p < 0.001). In the former patients, there were no differences in PD-1+ T-cell frequencies between the responder and non-responder subgroups (p > 0.05), whereas in the latter patients, the levels of CD8+PD-1+ T cells, CD4+PD-1+ T cells, and CD8+PD-1+/CD4+PD-1+ ratio did not predict tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) (p>0.05). Furthermore, in multivariate analysis of patients treated with or without PD-1 inhibitors revealed that the levels of CD8+CD38+ T cells (OR = 2.806, p = 0.006) were associated with tumor response, whereas those of CD8+CD28+ T cells (p = 0.038, p = 0.001) and natural killer (NK) cells (p = 0.001, p = 0.027) were associated with PFS and OS. Although, these independent prognostic factors were associated with progressive tumor characteristics (p<0.05), with the exception of CD8+CD28+ T cells, changes in these factors before and after treatment were unassociated with tumor response (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Circulating CD8+CD38+ T cells, CD8+CD28+ T cells, and NK cells were identified as potential prognostic factors for tumor response and survival in patients with HCC. Contrastingly, although PD-1 inhibitors can effectively block the T cell PD-1 receptor, the baseline PD-1+ T-cell frequencies and changes in the frequency of these cells have limited prognostic value.

2023 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Management of Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Puri III Recommendations

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents significant treatment challenges despite considerable advancements in its management. The Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver (INASL) first published its guidelines to aid healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC in 2014. These guidelines were subsequently updated in 2019. However, INASL has recognized the need to revise its guidelines in 2023 due to recent rapid advancements in the diagnosis and management of HCC, particularly for intermediate and advanced stages. The aim is to provide healthcare professionals with evidence-based recommendations tailored to the Indian context. To accomplish this, a task force was formed, and a two-day round table discussion was held in Puri, Odisha. During this event, experts in their respective fields deliberated and finalized consensus statements to develop these updated guidelines. The 2023 INASL guidelines offer a comprehensive framework for the diagnosis, staging, and management of intermediate and advanced HCC in India. They represent a significant step forward in standardizing clinical practices nationwide, with the primary objective of ensuring that patients with HCC receive the best possible care based on the latest evidence. The guidelines cover various topics related to intermediate and advanced HCC, including biomarkers of aggressive behavior, staging, treatment options, and follow-up care.

Combination treatment of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion

This study evaluated the therapeutic effects and toxic reactions of combining transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 82 HCC patients with MVI, among whom 35 were treated with TACE plus IMRT alone, and 47 were treated with the combined therapy of TACE, IMRT, and sorafenib. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were assessed. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups (all P > .05). In the TACE plus IMRT plus sorafenib group, the median PFS was 17.2 months (95% confidence interval, 14.1-19.9), significantly longer than the 9.4 months (95% confidence interval, 6.8-11.2) observed in the TACE plus IMRT group (P < .001). Additionally, patients treated with the TACE plus IMRT plus sorafenib showed a longer median OS than those treated with TACE plus IMRT alone (24.1 vs 17.3 months; P < .001). The occurrence rates of grade 1 to 2 hand-foot syndrome, other skin reactions, diarrhea, and hair loss were higher in the TACE plus IMRT plus sorafenib group (all P < .05). There were no grade 4 or higher adverse events in either group. The combination of TACE plus IMRT with sorafenib provided substantial clinical benefits in the treatment of HCC patients with MVI, increasing the tumor response rate and prolonging both PFS and OS. This approach demonstrated a tolerable and manageable safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab in patients with BCLC-defined stage C hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with lenvatinib and camrelizumab in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 141 patients with BCLC stage C HCC: 57 were treated with TACE combined with lenvatinib plus camrelizumab (T + L + C), 41 were treated with TACE combined with camrelizumab (T + C), and 43 were treated with TACE (TACE). The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). Factors that affected survival were identified via Cox regression analysis.

Results

Comparison of the three groups revealed a significant difference in the median overall survival (mOS), 19.8 months (95% CI 15.7-23.9) in the T + L + C combined group vs 15.7 (95% CI 13.1-18.3) months in the T + C combined group vs 9.4 (95% CI 6.2-12.5) months in the TACE group (P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was significantly better in the T + L + C combination group than in the T + C combination group and the TACE group [11.4 (95% CI 7.6-15.3) months vs 8.4 (95% CI 6.2-10.5) months vs 4.8 (95% CI 3.2-6.3) months, respectively, P < 0.001)]. The objective response rate (ORR) (57.9%) and the disease control rate (DCR) (75.4%) patients in the combined T + L + C group were higher than those in the other two groups. More patients in the combined T + L + C group experienced AEs, with 16 (28.1%) patients experiencing AEs of grade 3 or higher.

Conclusions

In patients with BCLC stage C HCC, those receiving the T + L + C combination demonstrated a superior survival benefit and acceptable safety profile compared patients receiving either TACE or the T + C combination.