Evaluating the risk of endometriosis based on patients' self-assessment questionnaires

Causal association between telomere length and female reproductive endocrine diseases: a univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and female reproductive endocrine diseases has gained significant attention and research interest in recent years. However, there is still limited understanding of the exact impacts of LTL on these diseases. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to investigate the genetic causal association between LTL and female reproductive endocrine diseases by employing Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

METHODS

Instruments for assessing genetic variation associated with exposure and outcome were derived from summary data of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was utilized as the main analysis method to investigate the causal relationship between LTL and female reproductive endocrine diseases. The exposure data were obtained from the UK Biobanks GWAS dataset, comprising 472,174 participants of European ancestry. The outcome data were acquired from the FinnGen consortium, including abnormal uterine bleeding (menorrhagia and oligomenorrhea), endometriosis (ovarian endometrioma and adenomyosis), infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Furthermore, to account for potential confounding factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, insomnia, body mass index (BMI) and a history of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis was also conducted. Lastly, a series of pleiotropy tests and sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the reliability and robustness of our findings. P < 0.0063 was considered to indicate statistically significant causality following Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Our univariable MR analysis demonstrated that longer LTL was causally associated with an increased risk of menorrhagia (IVW: odds ratio [OR]: 1.1803; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0880-1.2804; P = 0.0001) and ovarian endometrioma (IVW: OR: 1.2946; 95%CI: 1.0970-1.5278; P = 0.0022) at the Bonferroni significance level. However, no significant correlation was observed between LTL and oligomenorrhea (IVW: OR: 1.0124; 95%CI: 0.7350-1.3946; P = 0.9398), adenomyosis (IVW: OR: 1.1978; 95%CI: 0.9983-1.4372; P = 0.0522), infertility (IVW: OR: 1.0735; 95%CI: 0.9671-1.1915; P = 0.1828), PCOS (IVW: OR: 1.0633; 95%CI: 0.7919-1.4278; P = 0.6829), POI (IVW: OR: 0.8971; 95%CI: 0.5644-1.4257; P = 0.6459) or PMS (IVW: OR: 0.7749; 95%CI: 0.4137-1.4513; P = 0.4256). Reverse MR analysis indicated that female reproductive endocrine diseases have no causal effect on LTL. MVMR analysis suggested that the causal effect of LTL on menorrhagia and ovarian endometrioma remained significant after accounting for smoking, alcohol consumption, insomnia, BMI and a history of PID. Pleiotropic and sensitivity analyses also showed robustness of our results.

CONCLUSION

The results of our bidirectional two-sample MR analysis revealed that genetically predicted longer LTL significantly increased the risk of menorrhagia and ovarian endometrioma, which is consistent with the findings from MVMR studies. However, we did not notice any significant effects of LTL on oligomenorrhea, adenomyosis, infertility, PCOS, POI or PMS. Additionally, reproductive endocrine disorders were found to have no impact on LTL. To enhance our understanding of the effect and underlying mechanism of LTL on female reproductive endocrine diseases, further large-scale studies are warranted in the future.

Unraveling the significance of AGPAT4 for the pathogenesis of endometriosis via a multi-omics approach

Endometriosis is characterized by the ectopic proliferation of endometrial cells, posing considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Our study investigates AGPAT4's involvement in endometriosis pathogenesis, aiming to unveil new therapeutic targets. Our investigation by analyzing eQTL data from GWAS for preliminary screening. Subsequently, within the GEO dataset, we utilized four machine learning algorithms to precisely identify risk-associated genes. Gene validity was confirmed through five Mendelian Randomization methods. AGPAT4 expression was measured by Single-Cell Analysis, ELISA and immunohistochemistry. We investigated AGPAT4's effect on endometrial stromal cells using RNA interference, assessing cell proliferation, invasion, and migration with CCK8, wound-healing, and transwell assays. Protein expression was analyzed by western blot, and AGPAT4 interactions were explored using AutoDock. Our investigation identified 11 genes associated with endometriosis risk, with AGPAT4 and COMT emerging as pivotal biomarkers through machine learning analysis. AGPAT4 exhibited significant upregulation in both ectopic tissues and serum samples from patients with endometriosis. Reduced expression of AGPAT4 was observed to detrimentally impact the proliferation, invasion, and migration capabilities of endometrial stromal cells, concomitant with diminished expression of key signaling molecules such as Wnt3a, β-Catenin, MMP-9, and SNAI2. Molecular docking analyses further underscored a substantive interaction between AGPAT4 and Wnt3a.Our study highlights AGPAT4's key role in endometriosis, influencing endometrial stromal cell behavior, and identifies AGPAT4 pathways as promising therapeutic targets for this condition.

Nonsurgical approaches to the diagnosis and evaluation of endometriosis

An inability to make the diagnosis of endometriosis or evaluate lesion response to treatment without surgery is a clear impediment to understanding the disease and to developing new therapies. The need is particularly strong for rASRM Stage 1 or 2 disease, since higher stage (rASRM Stage 3 or 4) endometriosis can often be diagnosed by ultrasound or other imaging techniques. Despite promising findings in association studies, no biomarkers or nonsurgical diagnostic or evaluation methods for Stage 1 or Stage 2 endometriosis has yet been clinically validated. Admittedly, validation is difficult, since surgery is required as a gold standard diagnostic method for comparison. This manuscript is aimed as a succinct review of what is known about nonsurgical approaches to detect and assess endometriosis, with an emphasis on Stage 1 and 2.