Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT): first report from India

Neurovascular Adverse Effects of Sars-Cov-2 Vaccination

The global deployment of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been pivotal in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing morbidity and mortality associated with the virus. While most of these vaccines have demonstrated high efficacy and overall safety, emerging reports have highlighted potential neurovascular adverse effects, albeit uncommon, associated with these vaccinations. This review aims to assess and summarize the current knowledge on the neurovascular complications arising post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We conducted an extensive literature review, focusing on clinical studies and case reports to identify reported neurovascular events, such as ischemic stroke, cerebral sinus venous thrombosis, intracerebral hemorrhage, pituitary apoplexy and primary CNS angiitis Despite the relative rarity of these events, their impact on affected individuals underscores the importance of ongoing surveillance, early detection, and management strategies. We aim to provide healthcare professionals with the latest evidence on neurovascular adverse effects, facilitating informed decision-making in the context of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination programs. Furthermore, we highlight areas requiring further research to understand the pathophysiology of these adverse events better and to develop targeted prevention and treatment strategies.

Thrombosis and Bleeding in Patients with Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review of Published Cases

INTRODUCTION

 Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a highly prothrombotic reaction to COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) adenoviral vector vaccines. Its distinct bleeding and thrombotic patterns compared with other platelet consumptive disorders remain unclear.

METHODS

 We performed a systematic review of the literature (PubMed and Embase) up to July 31, 2022, including case reports and case series providing nonaggregate data of VITT patients. Accurate VITT diagnosis required fulfillment of the following criteria: (1) endorsement by the authors, (2) consistent vaccine type and timing, (3) presence of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, (4) detection of anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies. Data are presented as frequencies with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated with the exact binomial method.

RESULTS

 We retrieved 143 eligible studies, describing 366 patients. Of 647 thrombotic events, 53% (95% CI: 49-56) were venous thromboses at unusual sites and 30% (95% CI: 27-34) were cerebral venous sinus thromboses (CVSTs). The ratio of venous-to-arterial events was 4.1. Thromboses in most sites were associated with at least another thrombotic event, with the exception of CVST and CNS arterial thrombosis (isolated in 49 and 39% of cases, respectively). Bleeding occurred in 36% (95% CI: 31-41) of patients; 68% (95% CI: 59-75) of bleeding events were intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs). Overall mortality was 24% (95% CI: 19-29), and 77% (95% CI: 58-90) in patients with isolated CVST complicated by ICH.

CONCLUSION

 VITT displays a venous-to-arterial thrombosis ratio comparable to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. However, VITT is characterized by a higher prevalence of CVST and ICH, which contribute to the increased bleeding frequency and mortality.

Letter to editor - observation on the article titled "Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT): first report from India"

The first case of Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT) was reported in the letter-to-editor submission in the journal of Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion which was published online on 29th Sep 2021. Whereas, an article published in your journal on 04th Mar 2022 has been titled as first report of VITT from India which is a very conflicting statistic. The former article under reference has been diagnosed by a confirmatory functional assay as per the recommended guidelines and is thus genuinely the first case reported in this country.

Apixaban for the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Single-Centre Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare disease, and data regarding direct oral anticoagulant therapy are insufficient. Apixaban could have a safer profile than other direct oral anticoagulants. We present our case series of patients with CVT treated with apixaban and a systematic review of published real-world cases.

METHODS

We described our series of patients with CVT treated with apixaban and searched PubMed for similar published cases with reported complete outcome data: recanalisation rate, recurrent CVT, modified Rankin score, intracranial haemorrhage, other bleedings and mortality.

RESULTS

Four male patients (average age 43.5 years) with idiopathic CVT, who presented with a headache and/or seizure without neurological deficits/symptoms or cerebral infarcts/haemorrhage were treated with apixaban 5 mg twice daily for an average 28 months (18-46 months) and followed for on average 2.8 years. In two patients, a partial/complete recanalisation was achieved, there was no recurrent CVT, all patients achieved a modified Rankin score of 0, none experienced an intracranial haemorrhage, other bleedings or died. One patient, in whom anti-phospholipid syndrome was later diagnosed, had a recurrence of CVT after stopping apixaban. Our systematic review identified only 15 eligible patients (average age 39 years, 60% female). Partial/complete recanalisation was achieved in 74% of cases, there was no recurrent CVT, 95% achieved a modified Rankin score of ≤ 2, none experienced an intracranial haemorrhage, other bleedings or died.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cases and the review of similar published cases, albeit obtained on a smaller scale, suggest that apixaban may be a safe and effective therapy for CVT. This assumption should be tested in a large randomised study.

Link between COVID-19 vaccines and myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include ChAdOx1-SARS-COV-2 (AstraZeneca), Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), BNT162b2 (Pfizer), BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm), CoronaVac (Sinovac), and Bharat Biotech BBV152 (Covaxin).

AIM

To find the association between COVID-19 vaccines and myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

This is a systematic review that involved searching databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PakMediNet after making a search strategy using MeSH and Emtree terms. Eligibility criteria were set, and studies having no mention of MI as a complication of COVID-19 vaccination, protocols, genetic studies, and animal studies were excluded. Data was extracted using a predesigned extraction table, and 29 studies were selected after screening and applying the eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

The majority of studies mentioned AstraZeneca (18 studies) followed by Pfizer (14 studies) and Moderna (9 studies) in subjects reporting MI after vaccination. Out of all the studies, 69% reported MI cases after the first COVID-19 vaccination dose and 14% after the second, 44% reported ST-segment elevation MI, and 26% reported non-ST-segment elevation MI. The mortality rate was 29% after MI.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, many studies linked MI to COVID-19 vaccinations, but no definitive association could be found.

Acute Extensive Deep Vein Thrombosis After Heterogeneous Administration of Moderna mRNA Booster Vaccine: A Case Report

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) struck the world in 2019 and led to the development of the multisystem coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) causing a worldwide pandemic. Vaccines with boosters were developed due to novel mutations of SARS-CoV-2. Heterogeneous vaccination emerged with the perception that mixing vaccines can provide better protection. We present the case of a 68-year-old male patient who developed extensive acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the left lower extremity, two weeks following the Moderna mRNA booster vaccine (mRNA-1273). His first two doses were AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S [recombinant]. He was started on a heparin drip and prescribed rivaroxaban. We discuss the possible etiology of this DVT, the mechanism of action of the Moderna mRNA vaccine, the association of DVT with vaccine-induced inflammation, implications of heterogeneous vaccine combinations, and recommendations to advise people on possible thrombogenic adverse effects prior to mRNA vaccine administration.