Evaluation of Apixaban safety and effectiveness in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study

Lessons derived from post authorisation safety studies (ETNA-AF and XANTUS) on once daily direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Phase III trials should be integrated by post authorisation safety studies (PASS) to confirm their conclusions in real life. In this setting, comorbidities are commonly more prevalent, decisions about drugs and regimens are left to the attending physicians and therapy monitoring is not usually as strict as in pivotal trials.

AIMS AND METHODS

To evaluate real life safety and effectiveness of edoxaban and rivaroxaban, ETNA-AF Europe (ETNA-AF-Eu) and XANTUS studies were reviewed and compared. A further comparison between data collected in these studies and in the pivotal studies ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and ROCKET-AF was also performed.

RESULTS

ETNA-AF-Eu and XANTUS showed lower bleeding, stroke, cardiovascular- and all-cause mortality rates as compared to those observed in Phase 3 trials, even when including subgroups with lower comorbidities. Patients in ETNA-AF-Eu were older, with a larger proportion of octogenarians (≥85 years in 10.5%) and patients with impaired renal function as compared to patients in XANTUS (CrCl <50 ml/min in 18.2% vs 12.2%) and in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and ROCKET-AF, without paying any excess tribute in terms of safety. Therapy persistence was very high in the two real life studies (91.9% in ETNA-AF-Eu and 79.9% in XANTUS), thus showing that edoxaban and rivaroxaban are well tolerated in real life.

CONCLUSION

The ETNA-AF-Eu and XANTUS confirmed the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban and rivaroxaban in real life.

The safety and efficacy of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently observed cardiac arrhythmia in clinical settings. Obesity can influence the efficacy of the treatment administered, which requires a larger dose and more time to accomplish therapeutic targets due to altered pathophysiology. Our study aimed to assess the overall efficacy and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin in AF patients with morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2 and/or weight > 120 kg) to prevent complications.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search on PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus till October 2022 for articles addressing the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin for the treatment of AF in morbidly obese patients. We performed the meta-analysis with RevMan software version 5.4 and Open Meta Analyst. The main outcomes assessed were stroke, major bleeding, and minor bleeding after anticoagulation, as did the history of comorbidities and risk factors in morbidly obese patients. Quality assessment was performed using Cochrane's ROB-2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Regarding major bleeding events, pooled data showed that patients taking NOACs had a significantly lower risk than patients taking warfarin (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: [0.41-0.70]; p < 0.00001). However, for minor bleeding, there was a nonsignificant effect of NOACs on reducing the risk of bleeding (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.47-1.09; p = 0.12), which became highly significant in favor of NOACs after sensitivity analysis (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.49-0.61]; p < 0.00001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of stroke between the NOAC group and the warfarin group (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.60-0.80]; p < 0.00001). According to the results of the single-arm study analysis, the overall effect of all the outcomes was associated with a high risk of disease development in patients receiving NOACs.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed a favorable effect of NOACs vs warfarin in morbidly obese patients. Some outcomes were not significantly different, which calls for future research to better assess their safety and efficacy in this particular weight group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered with PROSPERO under registration number CRD42022362493 on October 2022.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been becoming prevalent in recent years and are increasingly used in the treatment of port vein thrombosis. The difference of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran remains unclear in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

This retrospective study included all consecutive cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis in our institute from January 2020 to December 2021. The patients received oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. The demographic, clinical, and imaging data of patients were collected. The diagnosis of acute PVT was confirmed by imaging examinations. The severity of liver cirrhosis was assessed using Child-Pugh score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Outcomes included recanalization (complete, partial, and persistent occlusion), liver function, bleedings, and survival. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier distributions of time-to-event outcomes. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were included, 52 patients (55%) received rivaroxaban and 42 (45%) with dabigatran. The complete and partial recanalization of PVT was observed in 41 patients. There was no significant difference in complete recanalization, partial recanalization, and persistent occlusion between the two groups. With multivariate analysis, D-dimer (HR 1.165, 95% CI 1.036-1.311, p = 0.011) was independent predictors of complete recanalization. The Child-Pugh score (p = 0.001) was significantly improved in both two groups after anticoagulation, respectively. However, there was no difference between the two groups. The probability of survival was 94%, 95% in the rivaroxaban and dabigatran groups (log-rank p = 0.830). Major bleedings were reported in 3 patients (6%) in rivaroxaban group and 1 patient (2%) in dabigatran group (p = 0.646). Six patients (12%) in rivaroxaban group experienced minor bleeding, and five (12%) from dabigatran group (p = 0.691).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety were comparable between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis. And D-dimer can contribute to the prediction of PVT recanalization in cirrhotic patients.

Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Regimens of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Morbidly Obese Patients: An Updated Literature Review

Data on the impact of morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m²) on the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are relatively limited, making it difficult to design optimal dosing regimens in morbidly obese patients.To review literature on PK/PD profile, efficacy, and safety of DOACs in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with morbid obesity and make recommendations regarding optimal dosing regimens in these patient populations.A detailed literature search was conducted (from inception to June 22, 2022) for relevant articles involving PK/PD and clinical data on DOACs use in morbidly obese patients with VTE or AF, or healthy volunteers.A total of 28 studies were identified. DOAC-specific PK variations and clinical outcomes have been observed. Obesity may have a modest effect on PK/PD of dabigatran, apixaban, or rivaroxaban. Dabigatran was effective in AF patients with morbid obesity but might increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Standard dosing of apixaban or rivaroxaban is effective and safe for VTE and AF patients with morbid obesity. Trough edoxaban concentration and anti-Xa activity were similar in different BMI groups (18.5 to >40 kg/m²), and standard dosing of edoxaban may be effective and safe for AF patients.Current evidence suggests dabigatran should be used with caution in patients with AF as it might increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding; Standard dosing of apixaban or rivaroxaban can be used in VTE or AF patients; Standard dosing of edoxaban may be considered in AF patients.

Atrial fibrillation episode status and incidence of coronary slow flow: A propensity score-matched analysis

Background

Previous studies have shown that patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) have a higher risk of developing coronary slow flow (CSF). However, whether AF episode status affects the incidence of CSF has not been confirmed. This study investigated the correlation between AF episode status and the incidence of CSF.

Methods

We enrolled patients with AF who underwent coronary angiography for symptoms of myocardial ischemia between January 1, 2017, and April 30, 2022, at our institution and classified them according to whether they had an episode of AF in the perioperative period. The outcomes were defined the occurrence of CSF overall and in each of the three coronary arteries. The analysis was repeated after adjusting the baseline information by the propensity score matching method in a 1:1 ratio.

Results

214 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study (AF episode group: 100 patients, AF non-episode group: 114 patients). Before matching, age, left atrial size, ejection fraction, heart rate, CSF incidence, and mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame counts were higher in patients with intraoperative AF episodes than in patients without episodes. To prevent the dependent variable (CSF incidence) from being confounded by confounding factors, we matched the two groups for age, left atrial size, and ejection fraction. In the logistic regression analysis, the incidence of CSF was significantly higher in the intraoperative AF episode group (P = 0.010, OR = 2.327, 95% CI: 1.226-4.416) than in the non-episode group.

Conclusion

In patients with AF, AF episode status is significantly correlated with an increased overall incidence of CSF.

Dilemmas Related to Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant Administration in Patients With Extreme Obesity

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to discuss the controversies surrounding the use and dosing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients recognizing the limitations of the existing evidence base that preclude strong recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of MEDLINE was performed (2020 to end August 2022) subsequent to recent guidelines using the following search terms: direct acting anticoagulants, obesity, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, dabigatran etexilate, and clinical practice guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA ABSTRACTION

English-language studies and those conducted in adults were selected.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The available randomized studies evaluating DOACs had relatively small numbers of patients with more extreme forms of obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 40 kg/m²) and none of the larger studies had a specific focus on dosing DOACs in obese patients. Recent guidelines by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) have specific recommendations for dosing DOACs in obesity. There are pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and observational studies published before and after the ISTH guidelines with a focus on DOAC dosing in obese patients that generally support the recommendations in the guidelines, but most involved small numbers of patients usually with BMIs <45 kg/m².

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review discusses DOAC dosing in obesity with important considerations for clinicians related to DOAC choice and dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing alterations of DOACs do not appear to be necessary when used for either prophylaxis or treatment in patients with BMIs up to approximately 45 to 50 kg/m², but research is needed for BMIs >50 kg/m².