Supporting implementation of Cochrane methods in complex communication reviews: resources developed and lessons learned for editorial practice and policy

The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Focused Interventions for Adults With Diabetes: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Adults with diabetes and impaired memory and executive functions are more likely to experience difficulties in diabetes self-management and achieving glycemic targets. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence of the effects of cognitive-focused interventions on cognitive ability, diabetes self-management, and management of glycemic levels for middle-aged adults and older adults with diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled/clinical trials published in English between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. A search was performed using 5 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) in addition to hand-searching. The search terms included diabetes, adults, cognitive-focused intervention, cognition, self-management, and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C).

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Cognitive ability and diabetes self-management were assessed using different measurements, and glycemic levels were measured with HbA1C. Nine studies applied cognitive training, one provided working memory training, and one used occupational therapy. Eight studies combined cognitive training with a co-intervention, including self-efficacy, lifestyle management, physical training, chronic disease self-management program, square-stepping exercise, psychoeducational intervention, and empowerment. Eight studies showed statistically significant improvements in at least one cognitive domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive-focused interventions have a positive effect on improving memory and executive function. However, the evidence of cognitive-focused interventions on diabetes self-management and glycemic levels has not been established. Future studies to improve cognition using effective strategies to improve cognitive function enhancing diabetes self-management behaviors and managing glycemic levels are warranted.

Effects of zoledronic acid on osteosarcoma progression and metastasis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Zoledronic Acid (ZA) has been shown to inhibit Osteosarcoma (OSA) progression in preclinical studies. However, the use of ZA as an intervention for OSA treatment and management remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials comparing the use of ZA with standard treatment vs. standard treatment alone for OSA patients after resection was conducted. Primary outcomes assessed event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, while secondary outcomes assessed impact of ZA on metastatic spread, histological response and adverse events occurrence. A literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (version 2) was used to assess trial quality. RevMan v5.4 was used for the meta-analysis. The between-trial heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi2 test and the I2 statistic and the GRADE methodology was utilized to assess certainty of evidence. Two studies were considered eligible for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis. ZA had no benefit on EFS (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.48-1.88; p-value 0.88), however, when compared to standard treatment it reduced OS (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.49-2.64; p-value < 0.00001). ZA did not deter lung metastasis (RR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0.35-18.60; p-value 0.35), and neither did it increase good histological response (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05; p-value 0.48). ZA treatment was associated with higher risk of adverse events. Based on existing data, the use of ZA as adjuvant therapy is not recommended for the treatment of OSA patients.

Investigating cardiovascular risk in premenopausal women on oral contraceptives: Systematic review with meta-analysis

Background

The use of oral contraceptives (OCs) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events such as arterial and venous thrombosis (VTE). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, with low- and middle-income nations accounting for over three-quarter of CVD deaths. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on the link between OC use and CVD risk in premenopausal women and to further assess the role of geographic disparities in the reported prevalence of CVD risk in women on OCs.

Methods

A comprehensive search of databases such as MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition was conducted, right from the inception to the present, by using the EBSCOhost search engine. The Cochrane Central Register of Clinical trials (CENTRAL) was also searched to augment relevant sources of information. OpenGrey, which is a repository of information providing open access to bibliographical references, was searched and the reference list of the selected studies was also scanned. The potential risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist. Data analysis was performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3.

Results

We included 25 studies that comprised 3,245 participants, of which 1,605 (49.5%) are OC users, while 1,640 (50.5%) are non-OC users. A total of 15 studies were included for meta-analysis, and the overall pooled estimates suggested a significant increase in the traditional cardiovascular risk variables [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.73, (0.46, 0.99) (Z = 5.41, p < 0.001)] and little to no difference in endothelial activation among OC users when compared with non-OC users [SMD = -0.11, (-0.81, 0.60) (Z = 0.30, p = 0.76)]. Europe [SMD = 0.03, (-0.21, 0.27), (Z = 0.25 p = 0.88)] had the least effect size, while North America had the highest effect size [SMD = 1.86, (-0.31, 4.04), (Z = 1.68 p = 0.09)] for CVD risk in OC users when compared with non-OC users.

Conclusion

The use of OCs suggests a significant increase in the prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk variables with little to no difference in the risk of endothelial dysfunction when compared with non-OC users, and the magnitude of CVD risks varies across different geographical regions.

Registration and protocol

This systematic review was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42020216169.

Efficacy of Ranolazine to Improve Diastolic Performance in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This article evaluates the efficacy of using ranolazine to improve diastolic performance and exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. A comprehensive literature review found eight trials where there are no significant difference in peak O2 (p=0.09) and exercise duration (p=0.18) between ranolazine and placebo. The ranolazine group had significantly higher and better diastolic parameters compared to placebo, with a mean difference of 0.45 (95% CI [27.18-39.50]). There were no significant differences for haemodynamic parameters (blood pressure and heart rate) and electrocardiography (QT interval) between ranolazine and placebo. The review found that ranolazine has good wefficacy to improve diastolic performance among heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients and it does not affect blood pressure, heart rate and rate of ventricular repolarisation (shortening of the QT interval).

Investigating the risks of cardiovascular disease among premenopausal women using oral contraceptive: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of oral contraceptives (OCs) is linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in women of reproductive age. CVD remain one of the top causes of death worldwide, with at least three-quarters of deaths occurring in low-income and middle-income nations. The impact of various types of combined oral contraceptive (COC) on several modifiable risk factors associated with CVDs in premenopausal women is inconsistent regardless of genetic mutations. The aim of this systematic review will be to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on the impact of COC usage on modifiable risk factors associated with CVDs and assess ethnic and geographic disparities in the reported prevalence of CVD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review protocol was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2015 statement. An extensive search on the Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library will be conducted from inception until. Two reviewers will independently screen for eligible studies using a predefined criterion. The risk of bias and quality of included studies will be assessed using the modified Downs and Black's checklist. Whereas the overall quality of included studies will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment tool.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This is a review of existing studies and will not require ethical approval. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. The use of OC and the risk of CVDs including arterial and venous thrombosis remain a major concern among women of reproductive age. Thus, given the impact of COCs on the risk variables linked with CVDs, this review may provide an insight and assistance during COC use.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020216169.

Talent Identification and Development in Male Futsal: A Systematic Review

This review aimed to identify and synthesize the most significant literature addressing talent identification and development in futsal. A systematic review of Web of Science™ (all databases), Scopus, PubMed and SPORTDiscus databases was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. This study included original articles in English, Spanish or Portuguese containing relevant data on talent development/identification of male futsal players. The search yielded 238 articles. After screening, a total of 32 manuscripts were fully reviewed. The quality of the data reviewed was generally good. Results indicate that the most successful players exhibit technical, tactical, anthropometric, physiological and psychological advantages and are distinguished from lower-level players based on their earlier dedication to training. This review highlights the need for those involved in the process of identifying and developing talented futsal players to consider the technical and tactical skills of futsal players, along with their anthropometric and physiological characteristics, scaled to age. Finally, special attention should be paid to the supportive psychosocial environments created in sports academies for developing futsal players. Overall, talent identification and development programmes in futsal need to be dynamic and offer the possibility of changing assessment parameters in the long term.

Impact of health literacy in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the impacts of health literacy on mortality, readmission, and quality of life (QOL) in the secondary or tertiary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Six electronic databases were searched on June 11, 2020. Observational studies involving patients with CVD, health literacy as an exposure factor and mortality, readmission, or QOL as outcomes were included in this study. Two researchers screened the retrieved articles and extracted data independently. The meta-analysis calculated the pooled relative risk of mortality and readmission. We also assessed the body of evidence based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Following screening of 1616 studies, 16 observational studies were included. The mean rate of low health literacy was 32.8%. All studies focusing on QOL showed significant impacts of health literacy. Pooled relative risk was 1.621 (95% confidence interval: 1.089-2.412) for mortality and 1.184 (95% confidence interval: 1.035-1.355) for readmission, indicating significant effects of health literacy. GRADE assessment showed "LOW" certainty for each outcome.

CONCLUSION

Low health literacy was significantly associated with increased mortality and hospital readmission and decreased QOL in patients with CVD.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Considering low health literacy in clinical practice is very important to improve prognosis of CVD patients.

Effects of Resistance and Endurance Training Alone or Combined on Hormonal Adaptations and Cytokines in Healthy Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

No previous systematic review has quantitatively compared the effects of resistance training, endurance training, or concurrent training on hormonal adaptations in children and adolescents. Objective was to examine the effects of exercise training and training type on hormonal adaptations in children and adolescents.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO. Eligibility criteria were: population: healthy youth population sample (mean age < 18 years); intervention: resistance training, endurance training, or concurrent training (> 4 weeks duration); comparison: control group; outcome: pre- and post-levels of hormones and cytokines; and study design: randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. We used a random-effect model for the meta-analysis. The raw mean difference in hormones from baseline to post-intervention was presented alongside 95% confidence intervals (CI). Further, the certainty of evidence quality and the risk of bias were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 3689 records were identified, of which 14 studies were eligible for inclusion. Most studies examined adolescents with fewer studies on children (age < 12 years, N = 5 studies) and females (N = 2 studies). Nine exercise training programs used endurance training, five studies used resistance training, and no eligible study used concurrent training. The meta-analysis showed no significant effect of exercise training on testosterone (MD = 0.84 nmol/L), cortisol (MD = - 17.4 nmol/L), or SHBG (MD = - 5.58 nmol/L). Subgroup analysis showed that resistance training significantly increased testosterone levels after training (MD = 3.42 nmol/L) which was not observed after endurance training (MD = - 0.01 nmol/L). No other outcome differed between training types. Exercise training resulted in small and non-significant changes in GH (MD = 0.48 ng/mL, p = 0.06) and IGF-I (MD = - 22.90 ng/mL, p = 0.07). GH response to endurance training may be age-dependent and evident in adolescents (MD = 0.59 ng/mL, p = 0.04) but not when children and adolescents are pooled (MD = 0.48 ng/mL, p = 0.06). Limited evidence exists to conclude on IL-6 and TNF-α effects of exercise training. Assessments of GRADE domains (risk of bias, consistency, directness, or precision of the findings) revealed serious weaknesses with most of the included outcomes (hormones and cytokines).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests that exercise training has small effects on hormonal concentrations in children and adolescents. Changes in testosterone concentrations with training are evident after resistance training but not endurance training. GH's response to training may be affected by maturation and evident in adolescents but not children. Further high-quality, robust training studies on the effect of resistance training, endurance training, and concurrent training are warranted to compare their training-specific effects.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42021241130.

Plausible conditions and mechanisms for increasing physical activity behavior in men with prostate cancer using patient education interventions: sequential explanatory mixed studies synthesis

PURPOSE

This mixed studies synthesis sought to evaluate structured patient education interventions (PEIs) to elucidate relevant conditions and mechanisms for increasing physical activity behavior in men with prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Studies that randomized men diagnosed with PCa, assessed PEIs, and reported (1) between-group changes in the outcome measures of exercise self-efficacy, PA level, or patient-centered outcomes (cancer-related fatigue, aerobic fitness, and quality of life) at baseline and post-intervention, and/or (2) men's perceptions of structured PEIs were synthesized. Results from five RCTs reporting data on 895 men and qualitative reports from four studies were respectively and sequentially analyzed with narrative and thematic syntheses. Findings from both syntheses were further integrated using the context-mechanism-outcome configuration (CMO) to elucidate potential "contextual factors" or "conditions" that may support plausible PEI mechanisms.

RESULTS

Structured PEIs were associated with a beneficial increase in task self-efficacy, vigorous-intensity PA, minutes/week of resistance exercise, the proportion of men meeting ≥ 150 minutes/week of moderate-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise, and overall PA. No effects were found on patient-centered outcomes. Drawing upon the CMO configuration, the inclusion of a referral process, access to "credible influence" (e.g., involving former patients as program facilitators), and adopting hybrid service delivery are likely critical conditions that may explain the success of PEIs in men with PCa.

CONCLUSION

PEIs can increase PA behavior in men with PCa. The likelihood of success is higher for multicomponent interventions that prioritized credible influence and exercise referral as critical components besides offering access to interventions within hospital settings, with home-based sessions in addition.

Understanding global health policy engagements with qualitative research: Qualitative evidence syntheses and the OptimizeMNH guidelines

Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence-or 'qualitative evidence syntheses' (QES)-have recently become an important form of knowledge production within the broader projects of 'evidence-based medicine' (EBM) and 'evidence-informed policymaking' in global health. Proponents of QES argue that these reviews offer a way to promote 'health systems thinking' and build a better understanding of local process and context in global health policy- and decision-making. EBM's detailed technical procedures for evidence synthesis, however, do not necessarily fit well with conventional qualitative research paradigms and there are concerns that subjecting qualitative research to EBM's logics and practices might fatally compromise both its epistemological integrity and political impact. This article addresses these concerns via a reflective case study of the use of qualitative evidence in the World Health Organization's (WHO) OptimizeMNH guidelines for task shifting in maternal and newborn health programs. When I first joined the team developing the evidence base for these health systems-oriented guidelines, I wondered whether the inclusion of qualitative research would result in a broadening of the forms of reason, experience and judgment that informed global health policy, or instead, be another disheartening example of how modern bureaucratic systems coopt, standardize, and complexity-reduce the alternative logics they encounter. While the integration of qualitative evidence did come at some cost to the depth and critical insights of the evidence we were reviewing, there were also important ways in which the technical procedures of evidence-based medicine were open to adaptation and transformation. The formal inclusion of qualitative evidence syntheses in these global guidelines did not represent-or produce-a dramatic about-turn in global health policy's hegemonic discourses and practices. It did reveal, however, that powerful systems of health governance like the WHO and evidence-based medicine are not inevitably closed, but in fact open to change, in often unpredictable ways.

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy efficacy in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: To evaluate mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) administration safety and efficacy in COVID-19 patients. Methods: We conducted a literature search on PubMed/MEDLINE, medRxiv, EBSCOhost/CINAHL, ProQuest, and Scopus with keywords adjusted to each search engine’s specifications on February 12, 2021. Interventional studies that reviewed MSC efficacy (mortality, hospitalization duration, need for mechanical ventilators, and inflammation markers) and/or safety (adverse events) in COVID-19 patients who were 18 years old or more were included in this study. Study eligibility, data extraction, and study quality assessment were conducted independently by each author. Results: A total of five studies of moderate to high quality with a total of 193 patients were included. One of the three randomized studies included did not apply blinding to either participants or medical professionals. Pooled OR (Odd Ratio) for mortality risk, adverse events incidence, and use of mechanical ventilators for patients on MSC therapy were 0.13 [95% CI: 0.02, 0.68], 0.91 [95% CI: 0.45, 1.86], and 0.42 [95% CI: 0.12, 1.47], respectively. Pooled mean difference for hospitalization duration in the MSC group versus the control was -3.54 [CI 95%: -4.68, -2.40] with 7% heterogeneity. All studies agreed that there was an increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a decrease of anti-inflammatory markers that were statistically different in the MSC group. Conclusion: Mesenchymal stem cell administration to COVID-19 patients is safe and effective in reducing mortality and hospitalization duration. Furthermore, a decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokines and an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines were observed.

A Consent Support Resource with Benefits and Harms of Vaccination Does Not Increase Hesitancy in Parents-An Acceptability Study

It is unclear whether information given about the benefits and risks of routine childhood vaccination during consent may cue parental vaccine hesitancy. Parents were surveyed before and after reading vaccine consent information at a public expo event in Sydney, Australia. We measured vaccine hesitancy with Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccine Short Scale (PACV-SS), informed decision-making with Informed Subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS-IS), items from Stage of Decision Making, Positive Attitude Assessment, Vaccine Safety and Side Effect Concern, and Vaccine Communication Framework (VCF) tools. Overall, 416 parents showed no change in vaccine hesitancy (mean PACV-SS score pre = 1.97, post = 1.94; diff = −0.02 95% CI −0.10 to 0.15) but were more informed (mean DCS-IS score pre = 29.05, post = 7.41; diff = −21.63 95% CI −24.17 to −18.56), were more positive towards vaccination (pre = 43.8% post = 50.4%; diff = 6.5% 95% CI 3.0% to 10.0%), less concerned about vaccine safety (pre = 28.5%, post = 23.0%, diff = −5.6% 95% CI −2.3% to −8.8%) and side effects (pre = 37.0%, post = 29.0%, diff = −8.0% 95% CI −4.0% to −12.0%) with no change in stage of decision-making or intention to vaccinate. Providing information about the benefits and risks of routine childhood vaccination increases parents’ informed decision-making without increasing vaccine hesitancy.

Increasing number of authors in Cochrane reviews

OBJECTIVE

To investigate authorship trends in Cochrane reviews from 1996 to 2018, and to examine if the authorship criteria from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) were met for Cochrane reviews with more than 15 authors based on the text in the section "Contributions of authors."

METHODS

The median number of authors per review was calculated, and authorship trends within each editorial group were analyzed. The section "Contributions of authors" was assessed about the first and second authorship criteria from the ICMJE for reviews with more than 15 authors.

RESULTS

A total of 7447 Cochrane reviews were studied based on data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The median number of authors per Cochrane review was 3 in 1996 (IQR 2.5-3, range 2-3), 4 in 2007 (IQR 3-5, range 1-13), and 5 in 2018 (IQR 4-7, range 2-22). Within each editorial group, the total number of authors either increased (26/55, 47%) or was unchanged (29/55, 53%). Based on the text in "Contributions of authors," 59% (16/27) of the reviews with more than 15 authors had authors that did not fulfil the ICMJE authorship criteria. However, the text in "Contributions of authors" was often difficult to interpret.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of authors per Cochrane review gradually increased from 1996 to 2018. The ICMJE authorship criteria were probably not met by all authors in more than half of the reviews with more than 15 authors.