1
|
Harrall K, Louise Sinnott E, Roebuck Saez L, Clunie G. Could you give me a leg up …? Models, frameworks and support structures to help aspiring clinical academic speech and language therapists. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024; 59:876-901. [PMID: 37966102 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing research capacity and capability for the speech and language therapy (SLT) profession is a key national strategic driver, with many speech and language therapists (SLTs) aspiring to a clinical academic (CA) career. There are known benefits but also acknowledged challenges with this career path, including limited funding opportunities and a poorly established career trajectory. AIMS To present models, frameworks and support structures that can be used by aspiring SLT CAs to chart research knowledge and skills, and plan career development. Organisational models are also presented to facilitate SLT CA career development and research capacity-building. METHODS & PROCEDURES A narrative review was conducted using a literature search of published peer-reviewed journals across four electronic databases: Medline, CINAHL, AMED and Embase, with additional search for grey literature through internet searches. Search results were screened against eligibility criteria by two researchers, with full-text articles retrieved and reviewed by four researchers independently. RESULTS & DISCUSSION The database search and grey literature search combined identified 610 records. Full-text screening of 66 records resulted in 19 articles or grey literature sources being included within the narrative review. MAIN CONTRIBUTION This paper details models, frameworks and support structures pertinent to SLTs that can be used at an individual and organizational level to assist CA skill development and career paths. CONCLUSION & IMPLICATIONS The national climate is looking positive for aspiring SLT CAs. The time is now to take the initiative and use the support structures available to show our CA value and develop the necessary skills outlined within these resources to fulfil our ambitions. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Interest in CA careers within the SLT profession is increasing. Whilst there are known benefits to embedding research within clinical practice, barriers exist including the strategic and operational steps individuals can take to make the career path a reality. What this study adds This narrative review has searched the literature for CA models, frameworks and support structures created for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. These tools are presented and discussed, with special consideration and focus to the SLT profession. What are the clinical implications of this work? This paper will provide SLTs with the tools to support their personal CA career development as well as advocate for CA roles within their teams and organisations. Organisational models are also presented to support SLT managers to foster a CA path for workforce development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Harrall
- East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK
| | | | | | - Gemma Clunie
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
El Ansari W, Arafa M, Shah R, Harraz A, Shokeir A, Zohdy W, Savira M, Agarwal A. Pushing the Boundaries for Evidenced-Based Practice: Can Online Training Enhance Andrology Research Capacity Worldwide? An Exploration of the Barriers and Enablers - The Global Andrology Forum. World J Mens Health 2024; 42:394-407. [PMID: 37635339 PMCID: PMC10949034 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This is the first study to design and assess a research capacity building (RCB) specifically tailored for clinical and non-clinical andrology practitioners worldwide. We appraised: 1) the barriers and enablers to research among these practitioners; 2) attendees' satisfaction with the webinar; and 3) research knowledge acquisition as a result of the webinar (before/after quiz). MATERIALS AND METHODS A online RCB webinar was designed, comprising two presentations in research design and systematic review/meta-analysis (SR/MA). An online survey using validated published questionnaires assessed the three above-stated objectives. Paired t-test compared the means of the pre- and post-webinar scores. Subgroup analysis was performed on the participants' professional background, sex, and number of years in practice. RESULTS A total of 237 participants attended the webinar, of which 184 completed the survey and are included in the current analysis. Male participants were about double the females and 60.9% were from Asian countries. The most common research enablers were to publish scientific papers (14.8%) and to develop research (14.7%) or new skills (12.7%). The most common barriers were the lack of training in research (12.4%), training in research software (11.8%), and time for research (11.8%). Satisfaction with the webinar was considerably high (86.3%-88.4%) for the different features of the webinar. Compared to the pre-webinar knowledge level, there were significant improvements in participants' research knowledge acquisition after the webinar in terms of the total score for the quiz (13.7±4.31 vs. 21.5±4.7), as well as the scores for the study design (7.12±2.37 vs. 11.5±2.69) and SR/MA sessions (6.63±2.63 vs. 9.93±2.49) (p<0.001 for each). CONCLUSIONS Clinical and non-clinical andrology webinar attendees recognized the importance of research and exhibited a range of research skills, knowledge and experience. There were significant improvements in the participants' knowledge and understanding of the components of scientific research. We propose an RCB model that can be implemented and further modeled by organizations with similar academic research goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walid El Ansari
- Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Postgarduate Medcial Education, College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mohamed Arafa
- Department of Urology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Andrology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical-Qatar, Doha, Qatar
- Global Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA
| | - Rupin Shah
- Global Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA
- Department of Urology, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Ahmed Harraz
- Global Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA
- Urology and Nephrology Centre, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Farwaniya Hospital, Farwaniya, Kuwait
- Sabah Al Ahmad Urology Center, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Ahmed Shokeir
- Global Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA
- Urology and Nephrology Centre, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Wael Zohdy
- Department of Andrology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Global Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA
| | - Missy Savira
- Global Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA
- Department of Urology, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ashok Agarwal
- Global Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spring C, Hogg J, Holliday J, Cooke J, Taylor RM. Using the making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) questionnaire to evaluate the benefits of a fellowship programme for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. Nurse Res 2023; 31:30-37. [PMID: 37795565 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing emphasis in the UK on developing a nurse, midwife and allied health professional (NMAHP) workforce that conducts research. Training for clinical academic careers is provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). However, the low number of successful applicants suggested there were barriers to achieving this. The Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Led Research (CNMR) launched a fellowship programme in 2016 to backfill two days a week of NMAHPs' time for up to a year, to give them time to make competitive applications to the NIHR. AIM To report a study evaluating the CNMR fellowship programme. DISCUSSION The making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) tool ( Cooke et al 2019 ) was developed to describe the organisational impact of research. The 2016-17 CNMR fellows completed VICTOR and their responses were analysed using a framework approach. The analysis found the main benefits of participating in the programme were protected time for research, opportunities to develop collaborations, increasing intra- and inter-professional awareness of NMAHPs' research, peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations. Challenges included a lack of support from line managers, limited value placed on NMAHPs' research and failure to backfill posts. CONCLUSION There were some challenges with the fellowship programme, but all recipients found it to be a positive experience and undertook significant scholarly activity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE A contractual agreement must be established to foster committed partnerships between higher education institutions (HEIs) and the NHS. HEIs and the NHS should conduct frank discussions of the challenges encountered in fellowship programmes. Positive initiatives and outcomes in tertiary education and clinical settings should be shared to improve fellows' experiences and enhance partnerships between HEIs and the NHS. Job descriptions should include time allocation to review fellowship candidates' applications regardless of outcome. The showcasing of research successes and the benefits of NMAHP research must evolve to secure organisational 'buy in', which is the precursor to widening access to clinical academic pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Spring
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Julie Hogg
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, England
| | | | - Jo Cooke
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- Midwife and Allied Health Professional Led Research, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun Y, Huang T, Xu Y, Zhu X. The role practice approach for exercise and enhancement of nursing research capacity: A qualitative study. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 2023; 130:105926. [PMID: 37591112 DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Strategies to improve the teaching effectiveness of nursing research courses are a fundamental objective of contemporary nursing educators. The role practice method is the sum of ways, means, and procedures used to perform role-specific practical learning activities through the adaptation of concepts, models and subjective abilities in an authentic environment. This technique enhances teaching effectiveness by encouraging students to actively participate in practice. OBJECTIVE The main aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of the role practice approach within the framework of nursing research courses and provide guidance for subsequent teaching efforts. METHODS The purposive sampling method was used to recruit 16 students who participated in teaching of the role practice approach and completed all tasks set within the nursing research course in the third year of the undergraduate nursing program of a comprehensive university in south China. Data obtained from semi-structured interviews were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis method. RESULTS Three themes were evaluated, specifically, self-improvement, self-inadequacy and course optimization. CONCLUSION The role practice method is effective in teaching nursing research courses and can enhance the ability of students to conduct research activities. However, deficiencies in the implementation plan exist that need further revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Sun
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ting Huang
- Department of Nursing, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yinuo Xu
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaowen Zhu
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Underwood F, Kent B, Rae P, O’Keeffe K, Shawe J. The South West Clinical School model: an initiative to transform clinical academic career pathways. J Res Nurs 2023; 28:531-542. [PMID: 38144954 PMCID: PMC10741261 DOI: 10.1177/17449871231209037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Clinical School Model connects professorial staff from the university directly to practitioners in the National Health Service to promote evidence informed practice and develop clinical academic careers. These are promoted widely, but strategic adoption into organisational culture and workforce plans are challenging to overcome. Aims To describe the development of the Clinical School Model in Cornwall and explore how it generates impact through staff engagement activities to support clinical academic career pathways. Structure, process and outcomes developments over the last 3-years are reported. Methods Donabedian's framework (structure, process and outcome) was used to report on the development and impact of the Clinical School Model. Results Structural and process activities are reported, illustrating strong foundations to embed clinical academic career pathway opportunities. In the absence of empirical reporting standards for such developments, quantitative and qualitative outcomes are reported against the Clinical School's 5-year strategic plan. Conclusions This paper responds to the lack of reported evidence on developing organisational infrastructure to address the clinical academics aspirations of nurses and their employers. This important contribution leads a call for more organisations to report to the evidence base, enabling shared learning and shaping future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frazer Underwood
- Associate Clinical Professor (Honorary)/Consultant Nurse and Co-Director, The South West Clinical School in Cornwall, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, UK; University of Plymouth, UK
| | - Bridie Kent
- Professor in Nursing Leadership and Director, The University of Plymouth Centre for Innovations in Health and Social Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, UK
| | - Pamela Rae
- Research Fellow, Plymouth Integrative Health and Social Care Education Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, UK
| | - Kim O’Keeffe
- Chief Nursing Officer for Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust and Cornwall Partnership Foundation NHS Trust, Trust Headquarters, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Jill Shawe
- Professor in Maternal and Family Health and Co-Director, The South West Clinical School in Cornwall, UK
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, UK; Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yount KM, Comeau D, Blake SC, Sales J, Sacks M, Nicol H, Bergenfeld I, Kalokhe AS, Stein AD, Whitaker DJ, Parrott D, Van HTH. Consortium for violence prevention research, leadership training, and implementation for excellence (CONVERGE): a protocol to train science leaders in gender-based-violence and violence-against-children research for impact. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1181543. [PMID: 37469691 PMCID: PMC10352114 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1181543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gender-based violence (GBV) and violence against children (VAC) are two prevalent and highly interconnected global health challenges, yet data and research capacities to study these forms of violence and to generate evidence-based policies and programs remain limited. To address critical shortages in research capacity in Vietnam and to establish a model for other Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), we are establishing CONVERGE-the Consortium for Violence Prevention Research, Implementation, and Leadership Training for Excellence. Methods Based on a needs assessment with partners in Vietnam, CONVERGE will provide a comprehensive research training program supporting 15 long-term, postdoctoral trainees with multi-disciplinary research training in GBV and VAC. We also will offer in-country trainings and short-courses to 40 short-term mid-career academic trainees and 60 short-term practitioner/stakeholder trainees over 5 years to build productive GBV and VAC academic, scientific, and practitioner networks. The CONVERGE training program has four components: (1) 14 h of virtual/in-person annual mentorship training to prepare research mentors and to create a pipeline of future mentors in Vietnam; (2) a one-month intensive research training for long-term postdoctoral fellows at Emory University; (3) a structured 17-month, in-country mentored research project for long-term trainees that results in a peer-reviewed manuscript and a subsequent grant submission; and, (4) week-long in-country intensive translational trainings on implementation science, advanced topics in leadership, and advanced topics in science dissemination. Opportunities for on-going virtual training and professional networking will be provided for CONVERGE trainees and mentors in Vietnam with other trainees and mentors of D43s focused on injury/violence prevention, D43s housed at Emory, and D43s with other institutions in Southeast Asia. To assess the reach, implementation, fidelity, and effectiveness of these four components, we will implement a rigorous, mixed-methods, multi-level evaluation strategy using process and outcome measures. Findings from the evaluation will be used to refine program components for future trainee and mentor cohorts and to assess long-term program impact. Discussion Led by Emory University in the US and Hanoi Medical University in Vietnam, CONVERGE represents leading institutions and experts from around the world, with a goal of providing mentorship opportunities for early-career scientists with an interest in violence prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M. Yount
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Dawn Comeau
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Sarah C. Blake
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jessica Sales
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Michael Sacks
- Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Hannah Nicol
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Irina Bergenfeld
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Aryeh D. Stein
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Dominic Parrott
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aabel I, Lysdahl KB, Egeland CH, Andersen ER. What is in it for me? Norwegian radiographers and radiation therapists' experiences from obtaining a master's degree. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2023; 54:356-363. [PMID: 37149399 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiographers and radiation therapists are essential in providing patients with high-quality diagnostic imaging or therapeutic services. Therefore, radiographers and radiation therapists must get involved in evidence-based practice and research. Even though many radiographers and radiation therapists obtain their master's degrees, little is known about how this degree affects clinical practice or personal and professional growth. We aimed to fill this knowledge gap by investigating Norwegian radiographers' and radiation therapists' experiences when deciding to undertake and complete a master's degree and exploring the impact of the master's degree in clinical practice. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. The interview guide covered five broad areas: 1) the process of achieving a master's degree, 2) the work situation, 3) the value of competencies, 4) the use of competencies and 5) expectations. Data were analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS The analysis included seven participants (four diagnostic radiographers and three radiation therapists) working at six different departments of varying sizes across Norway. Four main categories emerged from the analysis, of which the categories: Motivation and Management support, were categorized into the theme experiences pre-graduation, whereas the categories Personal gain and Application of skills were categorized into the theme experiences pre-graduation. The fifth category Perception of pioneering embraces both themes. CONCLUSION Participants reported great motivation and personal gain, but challenges in management and application of skills post-graduation. The participants perceived themselves as pioneers, as there is a lack of experience with radiographers and radiation therapists undertaking master studies, hence no culture and systems for professional development are established. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE There is a need for professional development and research culture in the Norwegian Departments of Radiology and Radiation therapy. Radiographers and radiation therapists must take the initiative to establish such. Further research should investigate managers' attitudes and perceptions toward radiographers' master's competencies in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingunn Aabel
- Institute for the Health Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Norway.
| | - Kristin Bakke Lysdahl
- Department of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway (USN), Norway
| | | | - Eivind Richter Andersen
- Institute for the Health Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Newington L, Wells M, Begum S, Lavender AJ, Markham S, Tracy O, Alexander CM. Development of a framework and research impact capture tool for nursing, midwifery, allied health professions, healthcare science, pharmacy and psychology (NMAHPPs). BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:433. [PMID: 37138350 PMCID: PMC10157965 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09451-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an ambitious target to create a UK clinical academic workforce representing 1% of clinicians from nursing, midwifery, the allied health professions, healthcare science, pharmacy and psychology (NMAHPPs). Understanding and recording the impact that clinical academics make across healthcare services is crucial if we are to grow, value and support this highly skilled workforce group. However, it is currently difficult to systematically record, collate and report the impacts associated with NMAHPP research activity. The aims of this project were to i) develop a framework outlining the impacts that were important for key stakeholder groups, and ii) create and pilot a research impact capture tool to record these impacts. METHODS The framework was developed from the existing literature. It was refined, remodelled and approved by multidisciplinary stakeholder involvement, including patient and public representatives, healthcare managers and research-active clinicians. The framework was converted into a series of questions to create an electronic research impact capture tool, which was also refined through feedback from these stakeholder groups. The impact capture tool was piloted with research-active clinicians across a large NHS Trust and its associated organisations. RESULTS The impact framework contained eight elements: clinical background, research and service improvement activities, research capacity building, research into practice, patients and service users, research dissemination, economics and research funding, and collaborations. Thirty individuals provided data for the research impact capture tool pilot (55% response rate). Respondents reported a range of positive impacts representing all elements of the framework. Importantly, research-activity appeared to be a key driver for recruitment and retention in the sample population. CONCLUSIONS The impact capture tool is a feasible method of recording the breadth of impacts associated with NMAHPP research activity. We encourage other organisations to collaboratively use and refine our impact capture tool, with the aim of standardising reporting, and facilitating discussions about research activity within clinical appraisal. Pooling and comparing data will also allow comparison between organisations, and assessment of change over time or after implementation of interventions aimed at supporting and increasing research activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Newington
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Mary Wells
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Samina Begum
- Patient and Public Advisory Group Member, London, UK
| | | | - Sarah Markham
- Patient and Public Advisory Group Member, London, UK
| | - Oliver Tracy
- Patient and Public Advisory Group Member, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Alexander
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Goto Y, Yamaguchi Y, Onishi J, Arai H, Härter M, Scholl I, Kriston L, Miura H. Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:314. [PMID: 34763705 PMCID: PMC8588649 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01683-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Japan, the number of older people with various health problems and difficulties in living is increasing. In order to practice patient-centered care for them, not only medical professionals but also multidisciplinary teams including care professionals and patients need to practice shared decision making (SDM) in the context of long-term care. For this reason, a measure of SDM in consultations with healthcare professionals (HCPs) other than physicians is needed. Therefore, this study aimed at adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9, SDM-Q-Doc) for consultations with HCPs other than physicians in Japan. METHODS A pair of SDM measures that can be used by HCPs other than physicians, "Care SDM-Questionnaire for care receivers (SDM-C-patient)" and "Care SDM-Questionnaire for care providers (SDM-C-provider)" were prepared based on the Japanese versions of the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc. The internal consistency and conceptual structure of these measures were tested by secondary analysis of data from 496 participants from a workshop on SDM for different HCPs. Measurement invariance were tested by multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the patient (SDM-C-patient and SDM-Q-9) and provider (SDM-C-provider vs. SDM-Q-Doc) versions. RESULTS Both the Japanese SDM-C-patient and SDM-C-provider demonstrated high internal consistencies (Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.90 and McDonald's ω coefficient was 0.90 for both measures). CFA showed one-factor structures for both measures and original measures for physicians. Moreover, multigroup CFA showed configural and metric invariance between the novel care measures and original physician's measures. CONCLUSIONS Thus, the novel SDM measures for care providers in Japan as well as the original physician's measures could be used in training setting. As these measures were tested only in a training setting, their reliability and validity as new measures for care should be tested in a clinical setting in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Goto
- Department of Home Care and Regional Liaison Promotion, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
| | - Yasuhiro Yamaguchi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Joji Onishi
- Department of Community Healthcare and Geriatrics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hidenori Arai
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabelle Scholl
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Levente Kriston
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hisayuki Miura
- Department of Home Care and Regional Liaison Promotion, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Frakking T, Craswell A, Clayton A, Waugh J. Evaluation of Research Capacity and Culture of Health Professionals Working with Women, Children and Families at an Australian Public Hospital: A Cross Sectional Observational Study. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021; 14:2755-2766. [PMID: 34629876 PMCID: PMC8496547 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s330647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is limited evidence for use of the Research Capacity and Culture tool across multidisciplinary health professionals. We explored using the Research Capacity and Culture tool among multidisciplinary health professionals at an Australian secondary hospital. Methods A cross-sectional observational study where online and paper-based surveys of the Research Capacity and Culture tool were disseminated between November 2020 and January 2021. Descriptive analyses of demographic variables and Likert scale items were summarized using median and inter-quartile ranges. Differences between organization, team and individual domains were checked using a Friedman test. Post-hoc Wilcoxon signed rank tests determined specific differences between domains. Results Seventy-six multidisciplinary health professionals (female, 89.3%) reported overall perceptions of research success/skills highest in the organization (median 6), followed by the team (median 5) and individual domains (median 3.5). Only 21.3% agreed that research activities were a part of their role description. Mean scores across professions were highest for Medicine (5.47), Midwifery (4.52), Nursing (4.47) and Allied Health (3.56), respectively, for the team domain. Individual domain scores across all professions were below 50%. Commonly reported barriers to research were “lack of time for research,” “other work roles taking priority” and “a lack of skill.” “Developing skills” was the most common personal motivator. Conclusion Multidisciplinary health professionals reported the highest overall perception of research success/skills in the organization domain. Medical health professionals perceived research success/skills highest compared to nursing, midwifery and allied health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy Frakking
- Research Development Unit, Caboolture Hospital, Queensland Health, Caboolture, Queensland, 4510, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Research, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia
| | - Alison Craswell
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, 4556, Australia
| | - Anne Clayton
- Women, Children & Family Service Line, Nursing Executive, Caboolture Hospital, Queensland Health, Caboolture, Queensland, 4510, Australia
| | - John Waugh
- School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, Caboolture Hospital, Queensland Health, Caboolture, Queensland, 4510, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Simcock IC, Reeve R, Burnett C, Costigan C, McNair H, Robinson C, Arthurs OJ. Clinical academic radiographers - A challenging but rewarding career. Radiography (Lond) 2021; 27 Suppl 1:S14-S19. [PMID: 34274226 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explain what a clinical academic career can be, what it can lead to for the individual, profession and most importantly the patient, and why these roles are so important to radiography. KEY FINDINGS Multiple challenges to the adoption of clinical academic careers exist, including achievable measurable outcomes, visibility & senior support, and balancing different time demands. Equally the rewards are wide ranging and can advance both the individual and profession through role extension opportunities, increased career progression, patient benefits, and academic and research skills. CONCLUSION Clinical academic careers can provide advantages for the individual, department, profession and most importantly the patient with advanced clinical practice through evidenced based research. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Improving clinical academic careers within Radiography will promote research participation and increase radiographic roles in patient-centred research delivery and development. Combining evidenced based research with academic skills will lead to improved patient care and better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I C Simcock
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK; National Institute of Health Research, Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
| | - R Reeve
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK; University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - C Burnett
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, UK; Leeds National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, UK.
| | - C Costigan
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; National Institute of Health Research, Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | - H McNair
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - C Robinson
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK.
| | - O J Arthurs
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK; National Institute of Health Research, Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|