1
|
Løvik Brandvik C, Meshkovska B, Schultz GIG, Garnweidner-Holme L. Implementing a nutrition education intervention in Eastern Norwegian Kindergartens: barriers and facilitators. BMC Nutr 2024; 10:103. [PMID: 39049131 PMCID: PMC11270914 DOI: 10.1186/s40795-024-00908-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementations to improve healthy eating in kindergartens may play a pivotal role in shaping children's dietary behaviors. There is limited research on the implementation and key implementation determinants (barriers and facilitators) of interventions in kindergarten settings. The aim of this study was to explore kindergarten staff members' experiences with the implementation of a nutrition education intervention to identify implementation barriers and facilitators. METHODS We interviewed 12 employees from five different kindergartens in an Eastern Norwegian municipality between 2019 until 2020. The individual interviews were guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively, inspired by Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Implementation facilitators were satisfactory planning and presentation execution, including tailoring to kindergarten and staff needs, food and meals being a kindergarten/staff priority, and confidence-building of staff. Barriers included unsatisfactory planning and presentation execution, the presentation as a one-time event, non-tailoring to kindergarten and staff needs, and kindergartens/staff not prioritizing food and meals. CONCLUSIONS When developing and implementing similar kindergarten interventions, the following should be considered: a participatory approach, active engagement of staff, the physical learning environment, and the frequency of opportunities to revisit topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Løvik Brandvik
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Post Box 4, St.Olavs Plass, 0130, Norway
| | - Biljana Meshkovska
- Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Post Box 1072, Blindern, Oslo, 0316, Norway
- Centre for Global Health, Sustainable Health Unit, University of Oslo, Post Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Norway
| | | | - Lisa Garnweidner-Holme
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Post Box 4, St.Olavs Plass, 0130, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Butscher F, Ellinger J, Singer M, Mall C. Influencing factors for the implementation of school-based interventions promoting obesity prevention behaviors in children with low socioeconomic status: a systematic review. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:12. [PMID: 38347649 PMCID: PMC10860312 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00548-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health inequity (HI) remains a major challenge in public health. Improving the health of children with low socioeconomic status (SES) can help to reduce overall HI in children. Childhood obesity is a global problem, entailing several adverse health effects. It is crucial to assess the influencing factors for adoption, implementation, and sustainment of interventions. This review aims to identify articles reporting about influencing factors for the implementation of school-based interventions promoting obesity prevention behaviors in children with low SES. It aims to critically appraise the articles' quality, assess influencing factors, categorize and evaluate them, and to discuss possible implications. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in 7 databases with the following main inclusion criteria: (1) school-based interventions and (2) target group aged 5-14 years. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, its five domains (intervention characteristics, inner setting, outer setting, characteristics of individuals, process) along with 39 categories within these domains were used as deductive category system for data analysis. We grouped the articles with regard to the characteristics of the interventions in simple and complex interventions. For each domain, and for the groups of simple and complex interventions, the most commonly reported influencing factors are identified. RESULTS In total, 8111 articles were screened, and 17 met all eligibility criteria. Included articles applied mixed methods (n=11), qualitative (n=5), and quantitative design (n=1). Of these, six were considered to report simple interventions and eleven were considered to report complex interventions. In total, 301 influencing factors were assessed. Aspects of the inner setting were reported in every study, aspects of the outer setting were the least reported domain. In the inner setting, most reported influencing factors were time (n=8), scheduling (n=6), and communication (n=6). CONCLUSION This review found a wide range of influencing factors for implementation and contributes to existing literature regarding health equity as well as implementation science. Including all stakeholders involved in the implementation process and assessing the most important influencing factors in the specific setting, could enhance implementation and intervention effectiveness. More empirical research and practical guidance are needed to promote obesity prevention behaviors among children with low SES. REGISTRATION CRD42021281209 (PROSPERO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Butscher
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
| | - Jan Ellinger
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Singer
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Mall
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peng R, Li X, Guo Y, Ning H, Huang J, Jiang D, Feng H, Liu Q. Barriers and facilitators to acceptance and implementation of eMental-health intervention among older adults: A qualitative systematic review. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076241234628. [PMID: 38444518 PMCID: PMC10913496 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241234628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Electronic mental health interventions are effective but not well promoted currently among older adults. This study sought to systematically review and summarize the barriers and facilitators of accepting and implementing electronic mental health interventions among older adults. Methods We comprehensively retrieved six electronic databases from January 2012 to September 2022: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. The JBI-QARI was used to assess the quality of the research methodology of each publication. Eligible studies underwent data coding and synthesis aligned to inductive and deductive methods. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0 was used as a deductive framework to guide a more structured analysis. Results The systematic review screened 4309 articles, 17 of which were included (eight with mixed methods and nine with qualitative methods). We identified and extracted the barriers and facilitators of accepting and implementing electronic mental health interventions among older adults: (1) innovation: technology challenges, optimized functions, and contents, security and privacy; (2) outer setting: community engagement and partnerships, financing; (3) inner setting: leadership engagement, available resources, incompatibility, intergenerational support, training and guidance; (4) individuals: perceptions, capability, motivation of older adults and healthcare providers; and (5) implementation process: recruit, external assistance, and team. Conclusion These findings are critical to optimizing, promoting, and expanding electronic mental health interventions among older adults. The systematic review also provides a reference for better evidence-based implementation strategies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruotong Peng
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaoyang Li
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yongzhen Guo
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hongting Ning
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jundan Huang
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Dian Jiang
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hui Feng
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Oceanwide Health Management Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qingcai Liu
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Okamoto SK, Okamura KH, Marshall SM, Chin SK, Carson AB, An KJ, Song SD, Saladino PA, Prado G, Kulis SS. Examining implementation determinants of a culturally grounded, school-based prevention curriculum in rural Hawai'i: A test development and validation study. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2024; 5:26334895241262823. [PMID: 39050583 PMCID: PMC11268022 DOI: 10.1177/26334895241262823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This study examined the implementation determinants of a culturally grounded, school-based drug prevention curriculum in rural Hawai'i. Test development and validation procedures were used to examine the impact of implementation barriers and facilitators of the curriculum in public or charter middle/intermediate schools on Hawai'i Island. Method A five-phase, mixed-methods approach toward test development and validation was used. These phases included item generation (Phase 1), item refinement and selection (Phase 2), item reduction (Phase 3), reliability testing (Phase 4), and validity testing (Phase 5). Educational administrators, teachers, and staff employed by the Hawai'i State Department of Education (HIDOE) participated in the study. Results Phases 1 and 2 yielded 50 implementation barriers and 27 implementation facilitators that were evaluated by 204 HIDOE administrators, teachers, and staff. Factor analysis of the barrier items indicated a four-factor solution: (1) Innovation Barriers, (2) HIDOE State-Level Barriers, (3) Teacher-Level Barriers, and (4) Administrator-Level Barriers. Mean comparisons indicated that several barrier and facilitator items differentiated teachers from administrators in the sample. Conclusions This study contributes to the implementation measurement literature, specifically in the areas of mental health and substance use. It also highlights the importance of addressing multiple contextual levels in the implementation of culturally focused prevention interventions. Plain Language Summary Title Examining Implementation Barriers and Facilitators for School-Based Prevention in Hawai'i. Plain Language Summary Compared with other major ethnic groups, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) youth have substantially higher rates of substance use and higher adverse mental and physical health effects related to their use. Despite these disparities, educational and community-based practitioners have long struggled with implementing and sustaining promising substance use interventions for NHPI youth. This study contributes to our understanding of measuring implementation barriers and facilitators for substance use prevention for NHPI youth in rural school settings. It contributes to the field of health disparities and health equity promotion, by addressing calls for research to understand factors affecting successful implementation of prevention programs. This is critical toward achieving health equity for underrepresented and vulnerable populations, such as NHPI and rural youth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott K. Okamoto
- Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawai‘i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Kelsie H. Okamura
- Implementation Research Division, The Baker Center for Children and Families, Roxbury Crossing, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Momilani Marshall
- Thompson School of Social Work & Public Health, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Steven Keone Chin
- Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawai‘i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Adabelle B. Carson
- Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawai‘i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Katlyn J. An
- Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawai‘i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Sarah D. Song
- Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawai‘i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Paula Angela Saladino
- Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawai‘i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | | | - Stephen S. Kulis
- T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fathi LI, Walker J, Dix CF, Cartwright JR, Joubert S, Carmichael KA, Huang YS, Littlewood R, Truby H. Applying the Integrated Sustainability Framework to explore the long-term sustainability of nutrition education programmes in schools: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2023; 26:2165-2179. [PMID: 37548226 PMCID: PMC10564612 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980023001647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review aimed to identify and synthesise the enablers and barriers that influence the long-term (≥ 2 years) sustainment of school-based nutrition programmes. DESIGN Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Scopus) were searched to identify studies reporting on the international literature relating to food and nutrition programmes aimed at school-age (5-14 years) children that had been running for ≥ 2 years (combined intervention and follow-up period). Eligible studies were analysed using the Integrated Sustainability Framework (ISF), which involved deductive coding of programme enablers and barriers. A quality assessment was completed, using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. SETTING International school-based nutrition programmes. SUBJECTS Individuals involved with the implementation of school-based nutrition programmes. RESULTS From the 7366 articles identified, thirteen studies (seven qualitative, five mixed methods and one quantitative descriptive) were included, from which the enablers and barriers of eleven different nutrition-related programmes were analysed. Thirty-four factors across the five domains of the ISF were identified that influenced the sustained implementation of programmes. The most common barrier was a lack of organisational readiness and resources, whereas the most common enabler was having adequate external partnerships and a supportive environment. CONCLUSIONS These findings have application during the initiation and implementation phases of school-based nutrition programmes. Paying attention to the 'outer contextual factors' of the ISF including the establishment and maintenance of robust relationships across whole of government systems, local institutions and funding bodies are crucial for programme sustainment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Isabella Fathi
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4067, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Walker
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4067, Australia
- Health and Wellbeing Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Clare Frances Dix
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4067, Australia
| | - Jessica Rose Cartwright
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4067, Australia
| | - Suné Joubert
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4067, Australia
| | - Kerri Amelia Carmichael
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4067, Australia
| | - Yu-Shan Huang
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4067, Australia
| | - Robyn Littlewood
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4067, Australia
- Health and Wellbeing Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Helen Truby
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4067, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fahim SM, Alexander CSW, Qian J, Ngorsuraches S, Hohmann NS, Lloyd KB, Reagan A, Hart L, McCormick N, Westrick SC. Current published evidence on barriers and proposed strategies for genetic testing implementation in health care settings: A scoping review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:998-1016. [PMID: 37119989 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The slow uptake of genetic testing in routine clinical practice warrants the attention of researchers and practitioners to find effective strategies to facilitate implementation. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify the barriers to and strategies for pharmacogenetic testing implementation in a health care setting from published literature. METHODS A scoping review was conducted in August 2021 with an expanded literature search using Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstract, and Google Scholar to identify studies reporting implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in a health care setting, from a health care system's perspective. Articles were screened using DistillerSR and findings were organized using the 5 major domains of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS A total of 3536 unique articles were retrieved from the above sources, with only 253 articles retained after title and abstract screening. Upon screening the full texts, 57 articles (representing 46 unique practice sites) were found matching the inclusion criteria. We found that most reported barriers and their associated strategies to the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing surrounded 2 CFIR domains: intervention characteristics and inner settings. Factors relating to cost and reimbursement were described as major barriers in the intervention characteristics. In the same domain, another major barrier was the lack of utility studies to provide evidence for genetic testing uptake. Technical hurdles, such as integrating genetic information to medical records, were identified as an inner settings barrier. Collaborations and lessons from early implementers could be useful strategies to overcome majority of the barriers across different health care settings. Strategies proposed by the included implementation studies to overcome these barriers are summarized and can be used as guidance in future. CONCLUSION Barriers and strategies identified in this scoping review can provide implementation guidance for practice sites that are interested in implementing genetic testing.
Collapse
|
7
|
Wendt J, Scheller DA, Banik A, Luszczynska A, Forberger S, Zeeb H, Scheidmeir M, Kubiak T, Lien N, Meshkovska B, Lobczowska K, Romaniuk P, Neumann-Podczaska A, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Steinacker JM, Mueller-Stierlin AS. Good practice recommendations on implementation evaluation for policies targeting diet, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1259. [PMID: 37380979 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15775-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Health policies aim to achieve specific health goals through system-level changes, unlike common health interventions that focus on promoting specific health behaviors on individual level. However, reliable data on the feasibility and implementation of policy actions across Europe are lacking. Moreover, no practice-oriented guidance exists for policy makers and implementers on how to evaluate policy implementation.As part of the Policy Evaluation Network, we aimed to synthesise knowledge on how to evaluate the implementation of policies promoting healthy diets, physical activity, and reducing sedentary behaviours. The multidisciplinary working group comprised 16 researchers and conducted two scoping reviews, three systematic reviews, two meta-reviews, two qualitative case studies and one quantitative case study over three years. The target populations included the general population, those at risk for obesity, and school children. Based on these reviews and case studies, this article summarises and presents the findings and lessons learned regarding the implementation evaluation of policies in nine case reports.Drawing on these experiences, three critical requirements for policy implementation evaluation were set: 1) conduct a comprehensive policy implementation evaluation from a multi-level perspective, 2) use implementation frameworks to address processes, determinants, and outcomes, and 3) engage relevant stakeholders in policy implementation evaluation. Finally, the consensus process resulted in 10 steps for the implementation evaluation of policies to promote physical activity and a healthy diet and to reduce sedentary behaviours, which adhere to the requirements and resources of the targeted policy.The findings of an implementation evaluation can lead to a better understanding of why policies work or not and can serve as a basis for developing solutions. This practice-oriented guidance outlines factors that should be considered in policy implementation evaluation to address its complexity. In this way, involved researchers and practitioners are empowered to engage in the evaluation process to close the knowledge gap regarding policy implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Wendt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Daniel A Scheller
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Anna Banik
- Department of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Luszczynska
- Department of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Sarah Forberger
- Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Hajo Zeeb
- Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Marie Scheidmeir
- Health Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Kubiak
- Health Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nanna Lien
- Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Karolina Lobczowska
- Department of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Romaniuk
- Department of Health Policy, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | | | | - Jürgen M Steinacker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Annabel S Mueller-Stierlin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
- Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Günzburg, Germany.
- Institute for Epidemiology & Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jakobovich R, Berry EM, Levita A, Levin-Zamir D. Developing Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors in Early Age-An Intervention Study in Kindergartens. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15112615. [PMID: 37299578 DOI: 10.3390/nu15112615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Childhood obesity prevention is a leading public health challenge requiring the adoption of healthy lifestyles at an early age. We examined how the kindergarten environment can promote eating sensibly, drinking water and becoming physically active. The effects of an intervention program among 42 Israeli kindergartens (1048 children, aged 4-6) whose teachers participated in a health education training program were compared to 32 kindergartens (842 children) whose teachers did not undergo this training program. An eight-month intervention program focused on knowledge/mathematical/logical/critical thinking, self-regulation/control acquisition, and sensible decision-making abilities. We hypothesized that nutrition and physical-exercise-oriented intervention programs, combining knowledge/mathematical logical thinking, would positively impact the quality of children's mid-morning snack and water consumption, their ability to express feelings following physical exercise, and the adoption of healthy lifestyles at home. The quality of mid-morning snacks and water consumption were observed in both groups pre- and post-intervention. Qualitative interviews documented children's subjective feelings following physical exercise. A significant improvement (p < 0.001) was observed in the mid-morning snacks composition and in water drinking habits in the intervention group; 80% of children offered a physiological explanation regarding energy expenditure processes following intense physical exercise. In conclusion, kindergarten interventions implemented by trained teachers can promote adoption of health behaviors necessary for obesity prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronit Jakobovich
- Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6209804, Israel
| | - Elliot M Berry
- Department of Human Nutrition and Metabolism, Braun School of Public Health, Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel
| | - Asia Levita
- Faculty of Science and Technology Education, Technion, Haifa 3498838, Israel
| | - Diane Levin-Zamir
- School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, Clalit Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Tel Aviv 6209804, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shelton RC, Goodwin K, McNeil M, Bernitz M, Alexander SP, Parish C, Brotzman L, Lee M, Li WB, Makam S, Ganek N, Foskett D, Warren C, Metsch LR. Application of The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to inform understanding of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of opioid and naloxone training on college campuses. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:56. [PMID: 37221618 PMCID: PMC10204023 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00438-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The opioid epidemic in the US continues to worsen. Opioid-only and polysubstance-involved opioid overdose deaths are increasing among adolescents and young adults, who have limited knowledge of opioid overdose prevention, including recognition and response. College campuses have infrastructure to support national-level implementation of evidence-based public health strategies for providing opioid overdose prevention and naloxone training programs among this priority population. However, college campuses are an underutilized, understudied setting for this programming. To address this gap, we conducted research assessing barriers and facilitators to planning and implementing this programming on college campuses. METHODS We held 9 focus groups among purposively selected campus stakeholders whose perceptions were important to understand in planning for the dissemination and implementation of opioid overdose prevention and naloxone training. Focus group scripts were informed by The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to query about perceptions of opioid and other substance use, opioid and other substance use-related resources, and naloxone administration training. We used a deductive-inductive, iterative approach to thematic analysis. RESULTS Themes about implementation barriers included (1) the perception that problematic use of other (non-opioid) substances was more prevalent than opioid use on campus and focus on those substances would be a greater priority on college campuses; (2) student schedules were overwhelmed with academic commitments and extracurricular activities, making delivery of additional training challenging; (3) barriers related to the perceived complexity and decentralization of communication on campus, preventing students from knowing how to access substance use-related resources. Themes about implementation facilitators included (1) framing naloxone training as important in becoming a responsible leader on campus and in the broader community and (2) leveraging existing infrastructure, champions within existing campus groups, and tailored messaging to facilitate participation in naloxone training. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to provide in-depth insights into potential barriers and facilitators to widespread, routine implementation of naloxone/opioid education on undergraduate college campuses. The study captured diverse stakeholder perspectives and was theoretically grounded in CFIR, contributing to the growing literature on the application and refinement of CFIR across diverse community and school contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Kathleen Goodwin
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael McNeil
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA
- Columbia Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melanie Bernitz
- Columbia Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Family and Community Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Savannah P Alexander
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Carrigan Parish
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Laura Brotzman
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Matthew Lee
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Chloe Warren
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Lisa R Metsch
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA
- School of General Studies, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nicastro HL, Vorkoper S, Sterling R, Korn AR, Brown AGM, Maruvada P, Oh AY. Opportunities to advance implementation science and nutrition research: a commentary on the Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:1-6. [PMID: 36370119 PMCID: PMC10091491 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite population-wide recommendations by the U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans and others to encourage health-promoting dietary patterns, the proportion of Americans following dietary recommendations remains low. The gaps in the adoption and integration of evidence-based dietary interventions, practices, programs, and policies (EBIs) into community and clinical settings signal the need to strengthen efforts in implementation science (IS) in nutrition research to understand and alleviate barriers to adopting and sustaining healthy dietary behaviors and practices. Equally important is the translation of this research into practice in a variety of settings and across the diversity of populations. Recognizing this need, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2020-2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research calls for the expansion of IS as a key opportunity to advancing nutrition research. This commentary highlights three scientific opportunities to stimulate IS in nutrition research and provides examples for each opportunity. These include: (a) Advance consideration of implementation and dissemination early in the design of interventions to facilitate opportunities for equitable scale-up and sustainability of EBIs, (b) Develop and test strategies for equitable implementation of nutrition and diet EBIs in health care and community settings, and (c) Build and strengthen the infrastructure, capacity, and expertise needed to increase use of IS in clinical and community nutrition research to swiftly move the research into practice. By advancing the three opportunities identified in this commentary, the scientific community has the potential to advance the field of nutrition research and IS with the ultimate goal of improving public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly L Nicastro
- Office of Nutrition Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Susan Vorkoper
- Division of International Science Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Fogarty International Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rene Sterling
- Division of Genomics and Society, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ariella R Korn
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Rockville, MD, USA.,Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alison G M Brown
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Padma Maruvada
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - April Y Oh
- Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lehto R, Vepsäläinen H, Lehtimäki AV, Lehto E, Leppänen MH, Skaffari E, Abdollahi AM, Roos E, Erkkola M, Ray C. Effects of the DAGIS randomized controlled trial on home environment and children's food consumption according to the degree of implementation. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:2268. [PMID: 36471322 PMCID: PMC9720976 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14639-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combining process evaluation data with effectiveness data and examining the possible mediators of intervention effects elicits valuable knowledge about how and for whom these interventions are effective. The aim of this study was to examine whether the parental degree of implementation (DOI) of a home-involving preschool intervention affected children's food consumption via home mediators. METHODS The five-month Increased Health and Wellbeing in Preschools (DAGIS) intervention involved 476 participating children aged 3-6 years and was conducted in 2017-2018. Parents reported children's food consumption (g/day) outside childcare hours, the availability of foods at home, role modelling of food consumption, and the norms related to food consumption. In addition, parents reported the extent to which they had implemented the intervention program at home. Mediation analyses were conducted to examine the effect of low and high DOI compared to control group on the change in children's consumption of fruit and vegetables (FV), sugary everyday foods, sugary treats, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) via food availability in the home, parental role modelling and parental norms. RESULTS Compared to the control group, there was a direct effect of a high DOI on diminishing consumption of SSB (B -27.71, 95% CI -49.05, -4.80). No indirect effects were detected. In the high DOI group, a change in parental norm was associated with increased FV consumption showing an indirect effect (B 4.31, 95% CI 0.23, 10.59). In the low DOI group, there was an indirect effect via decreased food availability leading to decreased sugary everyday food consumption (B -2.17, 95% CI -5.09, -0.09). CONCLUSIONS Combining process evaluation and effectiveness data revealed a decrease in children's SSB consumption only in the high DOI group, as well as indirect effects on children's consumption of FV and sugary everyday foods. In order to gain more intervention effects, further studies are required in order to examine parental facilitators and barriers to the implementation of interventions and how to impact effectively the determinants of the targeted behavior. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN57165350 (8 January, 2015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reetta Lehto
- grid.428673.c0000 0004 0409 6302Folkhälsan Research Center, Topeliuksenkatu 20, 00250 Helsinki, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Henna Vepsäläinen
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aku-Ville Lehtimäki
- grid.428673.c0000 0004 0409 6302Folkhälsan Research Center, Topeliuksenkatu 20, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Elviira Lehto
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box, 00014 Helsinki, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 9, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marja H. Leppänen
- grid.428673.c0000 0004 0409 6302Folkhälsan Research Center, Topeliuksenkatu 20, 00250 Helsinki, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Essi Skaffari
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna M. Abdollahi
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eva Roos
- grid.428673.c0000 0004 0409 6302Folkhälsan Research Center, Topeliuksenkatu 20, 00250 Helsinki, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ,grid.8993.b0000 0004 1936 9457Department of food studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maijaliisa Erkkola
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Carola Ray
- grid.428673.c0000 0004 0409 6302Folkhälsan Research Center, Topeliuksenkatu 20, 00250 Helsinki, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ahrens W, Brenner H, Flechtner-Mors M, Harrington JM, Hebestreit A, Kamphuis CBM, Kelly L, Laxy M, Luszczynska A, Mazzocchi M, Murrin C, Poelman MP, Steenhuis I, Roos G, Steinacker JM, van Lenthe F, Zeeb H, Zukowska J, Lakerveld J, Woods CB. Dietary behaviour and physical activity policies in Europe: learnings from the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN). Eur J Public Health 2022; 32:iv114-iv125. [PMID: 36444106 PMCID: PMC9706119 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Policy Evaluation Network (PEN), initiated in autumn 2018, aimed at advancing the evidence base for public policies impacting dietary behaviour, physical activity and sedentary behaviours in Europe. This is needed because non-communicable diseases-the leading cause of global mortality-are substantially caused by physical inactivity and unhealthy dietary behaviours, which in turn are driven by upstream factors that have not yet been addressed effectively by prevention approaches. Thus, successful policy interventions are required that target entire populations and tackle the 'causes of the causes'. To advance our knowledge on the effective implementation of policies and their impact in terms of improving health behaviours, PEN focused on five research tasks: (i) Adaptation and implementation of a Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) and development of a Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI); (ii) Mapping of health-related indicators needed for policy evaluation and facilitating a harmonized pan-European approach for surveillance to assess the impact of policy interventions; (iii) Refining quantitative methods to evaluate the impact of public policies; (iv) Identifying key barriers and facilitators of implementation of policies; and (v) Advance understanding the equity impact of the development, implementation and evaluation of policies aimed at promoting physical activity and a healthy diet. Finally, and in order to provide concrete evidence for policymaking, existing exemplary policies, namely sugar-sweetened beverages taxation, active transport policies and school policies on nutrition and physical activity were assessed in consideration of these five tasks. At the end of the PEN project's formal runtime, considerable advancements have been made. Here, we present an overview of the most important learnings and outputs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Ahrens
- Correspondence: Wolfgang Ahrens, Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Achterstrasse 30, 28359 Bremen, Germany, Tel: +49 421 218 56822, e-mail:
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marion Flechtner-Mors
- Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Janas M Harrington
- HRB Centre for Health and Diet Research, School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Antje Hebestreit
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Carlijn B M Kamphuis
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Liam Kelly
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Michael Laxy
- Technical University of Munich, Professorship of Public Health and Prevention, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Mario Mazzocchi
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Celine Murrin
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maartje P Poelman
- Chair Group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Steenhuis
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute De Boelelaan 1085, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gun Roos
- Consumption Research Norway, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jürgen M Steinacker
- Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Frank van Lenthe
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands,Department of Human Geography and Public Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hajo Zeeb
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany,Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Joanna Zukowska
- Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|