Quantitative assessment of BRAF V600 mutant circulating cell-free tumor DNA as a tool for therapeutic monitoring in metastatic melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors

Mining nucleic acid "omics" to boost liquid biopsy in cancer

Treatments for cancer patients are becoming increasingly complex, and there is a growing desire from clinicians and patients for biomarkers that can account for this complexity to support informed decisions about clinical care. To achieve precision medicine, the new generation of biomarkers must reflect the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of cancer biology both between patients and within an individual patient. Mining the different layers of 'omics in a multi-modal way from a minimally invasive, easily repeatable, liquid biopsy has increasing potential in a range of clinical applications, and for improving our understanding of treatment response and resistance. Here, we detail the recent developments and methods allowing exploration of genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and fragmentomic layers of 'omics from liquid biopsy, and their integration in a range of applications. We also consider the specific challenges that are posed by the clinical implementation of multi-omic liquid biopsies.

Oncogene goosecoid is transcriptionally regulated by E2F1 and correlates with disease progression in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Although some well-established oncogenes are involved in cancer initiation and progression such as prostate cancer (PCa), the long tail of cancer genes remains to be defined. Goosecoid ( GSC ) has been implicated in cancer development. However, the comprehensive biological role of GSC in pan-cancer, specifically in PCa, remains unexplored. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of GSC in PCa development.

METHODS

We performed a systematic bioinformatics exploration of GSC using datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Genotype-Tissue Expression, Gene Expression Omnibus, German Cancer Research Center, and our in-house cohorts. First, we evaluated the expression of GSC and its association with patient prognosis, and identified GSC -relevant genetic alterations in cancers. Further, we focused on the clinical characterization and prognostic analysis of GSC in PCa. To understand the transcriptional regulation of GSC by E2F transcription factor 1 ( E2F1 ), we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Functional experiments were conducted to validate the effect of GSC on the tumor cellular phenotype and sensitivity to trametinib.

RESULTS

GSC expression was elevated in various tumors and significantly correlated with patient prognosis. The alterations of GSC contribute to the progression of various tumors especially in PCa. Patients with PCa and high GSC expression exhibited worse progression-free survival and biochemical recurrence outcomes. Further, GSC upregulation in patients with PCa was mostly accompanied with higher Gleason score, advanced tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Mechanistically, the transcription factor, E2F1 , stimulates GSC by binding to its promoter region. Detailed experiments further demonstrated that GSC acted as an oncogene and influenced the response of PCa cells to trametinib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

GSC was highly overexpressed and strongly correlated with patient prognosis in PCa. We found that GSC , regulated by E2F1 , acted as an oncogene and impeded the therapeutic efficacy of trametinib in PCa.

US physician perspective on the use of biomarker and ctDNA testing in patients with melanoma

New treatments have increased survival of patients with melanoma, and methods to monitor patients throughout the disease process are needed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a predictive and prognostic biomarker that may allow routine, real-time monitoring of disease status. We surveyed 44 US physicians to understand their preferences and practice patterns for biomarker and ctDNA testing in their patients with melanoma. Tumor biomarker testing was often ordered in stage IIIA-IV patients. Barriers to biomarker testing include insufficient tissue (60%) and lack of insurance coverage (54%). ctDNA testing was ordered by 16-18% of physicians for stages II-IV. Reasons for not using ctDNA testing included lack of prospective data (41%), ctDNA testing used for research only (18%), and others. Physicians (≥74%) believed that ctDNA assays could help with monitoring and treatment selection throughout the disease process. Physicians consider ctDNA testing potentially valuable for clinical decision-making but cited concerns that should be addressed.

Corresponding ctDNA and tumor burden dynamics in metastatic melanoma patients on systemic treatment

Radiographic imaging is the current standard for monitoring progression of tumor-burden and therapeutic resistance in patients with metastatic melanoma. Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown promise as a survelience tool, but longitudinal data on the dynamics between plasma ctDNA concentrations and radiographic imaging is lacking. We evaluated the relationship between longitudinal radiographic measures of tumor burden and ctDNA concentrations in plasma on 30 patients with metastatic melanoma on systemic treatment. In 9 patients with no radiographic evidence of disease over a total of 15 time points, ctDNA concentrations were undetectable. In 21 patients with radiographic tumor burden, ctDNA was detected in 81 % of 58 time points. Plasma ctDNA concentrations demonstrated a modest positive correlation with total tumor burden (TTB) measurements (R2= 0.49, p < 0.001), with the greatest degree of correlation observed under conditions of progressive disease (PD) (R2 = 0.91, p = 0.032). Plasma ctDNA concentrations were significantly greater at times of RECIST v1.1 progression (PD; 22.1 % ± 5.7 %) when compared to samples collected during stable disease (SD; 4.99 % ± 3.0 %) (p = 0.012); this difference was independent of total tumor burden (p = 0.997). Changes in plasma ctDNA showed a strong correlation with changes in TTB (R2= 0.88, p<0.001). These data suggest that measurements of plasma ctDNA during therapy are a better surrogate for responding versus non-responding disease compared to absolute tumor burden.

A multiparameter liquid biopsy approach allows to track melanoma dynamics and identify early treatment resistance

Melanoma heterogeneity is a hurdle in metastatic disease management. Although the advent of targeted therapy has significantly improved patient outcomes, the occurrence of resistance makes monitoring of the tumor genetic landscape mandatory. Liquid biopsy could represent an important biomarker for the real-time tracing of disease evolution. Thus, we aimed to correlate liquid biopsy dynamics with treatment response and progression by devising a multiplatform approach applied to longitudinal melanoma patient monitoring. We conceived an approach that exploits Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and droplet digital PCR, as well as the FDA-cleared platform CellSearch, to analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) trend and circulating melanoma cell (CMC) count, together with their customized genetic and copy number variation analysis. The approach was applied to 17 stage IV melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, followed for up to 28 months. BRAF mutations were detected in the plasma of 82% of patients. Single nucleotide variants known or suspected to confer resistance were identified in 70% of patients. Moreover, the amount of ctDNA, both at baseline and during response, correlated with the type and duration of the response itself, and the CMC count was confirmed to be a prognostic biomarker. This work provides proof of principle of the power of this approach and paves the way for a validation study aimed at evaluating early ctDNA-guided treatment decisions in stage IV melanoma. The NGS-based molecular profile complemented the analysis of ctDNA trend and, together with CMC analysis, revealed to be useful in capturing tumor evolution.

Successful Treatment with Dabrafenib/Trametinib of a Malignantly Transformed and Metastasized BRAF V600E Mutant Pleiomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Introduction

Pleiomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is considered a low-grade glioma with a favorable prognosis following surgical resection. We present a case report of a BRAFV600E mutant malignantly transformed and disseminated PXA that was successfully treated with BRAF-/MEK-targeted therapy (dabrafenib/trametinib).

Case Presentation

At the age of 16 years, our patient underwent an initial subtotal resection of a right occipital PXA. Six months later, a reintervention for an asymptomatic tumor recurrence was performed and complete resection was achieved. The patient has been followed up by MRI for 14 years without arguments for recurrence but was lost to follow-up thereafter. At 38 years of age, he presented with a symptomatic local recurrence with extra-cerebral soft tissue extension, for which a third surgical resection was performed. Anatomopathological examination reported a grade 3 anaplastic PXA (aPXA); molecular analysis detected a BRAFV600E mutation. Three months later, before the initiation of radiotherapy, a local tumor recurrence was diagnosed, for which he underwent a fourth surgical resection. Radiotherapy was performed following the surgical debulking. One month after completion of radiotherapy, disease progression was documented including multiple sites of extracranial metastases (skeletal, lung, cervical lymph node, and subcutaneous metastases). Systemic treatment with a combination of BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors (dabrafenib/trametinib) was initiated and resulted in a rapid and deep tumor response (partial response according to RECISTv1.1) and absence of BRAFV600E mutant ctDNA in plasma at 6 weeks after treatment initiation. A near-complete metabolic remission was documented on [18F]FDG-PET/CT 3 months after starting systemic therapy.

Conclusion

We present a rare case of malignant transformation and systemic dissemination of a BRAFV600E mutant PXA, occurring 20 years after the initial diagnosis. This case highlights the importance of long-term follow-up of patients diagnosed with these rare central nervous system tumors that initially are considered benign and also illustrates that BRAF/MEK inhibition can be an effective therapy for BRAFV600E mutated PXA, underscoring the importance of performing molecular genetic profiling of these tumors.

Promising and Minimally Invasive Biomarkers: Targeting Melanoma

The therapeutic landscape of malignant melanoma has been radically reformed in recent years, with novel treatments emerging in both the field of cancer immunotherapy and signalling pathway inhibition. Large-scale tumour genomic characterization has accurately classified malignant melanoma into four different genomic subtypes so far. Despite this, only somatic mutations in BRAF oncogene, as assessed in tumour biopsies, has so far become a validated predictive biomarker of treatment with small molecule inhibitors. The biology of tumour evolution and heterogeneity has uncovered the current limitations associated with decoding genomic drivers based only on a single-site tumour biopsy. There is an urgent need to develop minimally invasive biomarkers that accurately reflect the real-time evolution of melanoma and that allow for streamlined collection, analysis, and interpretation. These will enable us to face challenges with tumour tissue attainment and process and will fulfil the vision of utilizing "liquid biopsy" to guide clinical decisions, in a manner akin to how it is used in the management of haematological malignancies. In this review, we will summarize the most recent published evidence on the role of minimally invasive biomarkers in melanoma, commenting on their future potential to lead to practice-changing discoveries.

Circulating tumor DNA as liquid biopsy in lung cancer: Biological characteristics and clinical integration

Lung cancer maintains high morbidity and mortality rate globally despite significant advancements in diagnosis and treatment in the era of precision medicine. Pathological analysis of tumor tissue, the current gold standard for lung cancer diagnosis, is intrusive and intrinsically confined to evaluating the limited amount of tissues that could be physically extracted. However, tissue biopsy has several limitations, including the invasiveness of the procedure and difficulty in obtaining samples for patients at advanced stages., there Additionally,has been no major breakthrough in tumor biomarkers with high specificity and sensitivity, particularly for early-stage lung cancer. Liquid biopsy has been considered a feasible auxiliary tool for tearly dianosis, evaluating treatment responses and monitoring prognosis of lung cancer. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), an ideal biomarker of liquid biopsy, has emerged as one of the most reliable tools for monitoring tumor processes at molecular levels. Herein, this review focuses on tumor heterogeneity to elucidate the superiority of liquid biopsy and retrospectively discussdeciphersolution. We systematically elaborate ctDNA biological characteristics, introduce methods for ctDNA detection, and discuss the current role of plasma ctDNA in lung cancer management. Finally, we summarize the drawbacks of ctDNA analysis and highlight its potential clinical application in lung cancer.

BRAF Mutations in Melanoma: Biological Aspects, Therapeutic Implications, and Circulating Biomarkers

Melanoma is an aggressive form of skin cancer resulting from the malignant transformation of melanocytes. Recent therapeutic approaches, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, have improved the prognosis and outcome of melanoma patients. BRAF is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes recognised in melanoma. The most frequent oncogenic BRAF mutations consist of a single point mutation at codon 600 (mostly V600E) that leads to constitutive activation of the BRAF/MEK/ERK (MAPK) signalling pathway. Therefore, mutated BRAF has become a useful target for molecular therapy and the use of BRAF kinase inhibitors has shown promising results. However, several resistance mechanisms invariably develop leading to therapeutic failure. The aim of this manuscript is to review the role of BRAF mutational status in the pathogenesis of melanoma and its impact on differentiation and inflammation. Moreover, this review focuses on the mechanisms responsible for resistance to targeted therapies in BRAF-mutated melanoma and provides an overview of circulating biomarkers including circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA, and non-coding RNAs.

Dynamic ctDNA Mutational Complexity in Patients with Melanoma Receiving Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis promises to improve the clinical care of people with cancer, address health inequities and guide translational research. This observational cohort study used ctDNA to follow 29 patients with advanced-stage cutaneous melanoma through multiple cycles of immunotherapy.

METHOD

A melanoma-specific ctDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and mass spectrometry analysis were used to identify ctDNA mutations in longitudinal blood plasma samples from Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) patients receiving immunotherapy for melanoma. These technologies were used in conjunction to identify the breadth and complexity of tumour genomic information that ctDNA analysis can reliably report.

RESULTS

During the course of immunotherapy treatment, a high level of dynamic mutational complexity was identified in blood plasma, including multiple BRAF mutations in the same patient, clinically relevant BRAF mutations emerging through therapy and co-occurring sub-clonal BRAF and NRAS mutations. The technical validity of this ctDNA analysis was supported by high sample analysis-reanalysis concordance, as well as concordance between different ctDNA measurement technologies. In addition, we observed > 90% concordance in the detection of ctDNA when using cell-stabilising collection tubes followed by 7-day delayed processing, compared with standard EDTA blood collection protocols with rapid processing. We also found that the undetectability of ctDNA at a proportion of treatment cycles was associated with durable clinical benefit (DCB).

CONCLUSION

We found that multiple ctDNA processing and analysis methods consistently identified complex longitudinal patterns of clinically relevant mutations, adding support for expanded clinical trials of this technology in a variety of oncology settings.

Utility of ctDNA Liquid Biopsies from Cancer Patients: An Institutional Study of 285 ctDNA Samples

Liquid biopsy has improved significantly over the last decade and is attracting attention as a tool that can complement tissue biopsy to evaluate the genetic landscape of solid tumors. In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of liquid biopsy in daily oncology practice in different clinical contexts. We studied ctDNA and tissue biopsy to investigate EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations from 199 cancer patients between January 2016 and March 2021. The study included 114 male and 85 female patients with a median age of 68 years. A total of 122 cases were lung carcinoma, 53 were colorectal carcinoma, and 24 were melanoma. Liquid biopsy was positive for a potentially druggable driver mutation in 14 lung and colorectal carcinoma where tissue biopsy was not performed, and in two (3%) lung carcinoma patients whose tissue biopsy was negative. Liquid biopsy identified nine (45%) de novo EGFR-T790M mutations during TKI-treatment follow-up in lung carcinoma. BRAF-V600 mutation resurgence was detected in three (12.5%) melanoma patients during follow-up. Our results confirm the value of liquid biopsy in routine clinical oncologic practice for targeted therapy, diagnosis of resistance to treatment, and cancer follow-up.

Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Oncogene-Driven NSCLC: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

As we enter an unprecedented era of personalized medicine, molecular targeted therapies have the potential to induce improved survival outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a significant percentage of oncogene-driven NSCLC patients will relapse even after definitive treatment, whereas chronic and durable response to targeted therapies is a less common event in advanced-stage lung cancer. This phenomenon could be attributed to minimal residual disease (MRD), defined as a population of disseminated tumor cells that survive during the course or after treatment, eventually leading to recurrence and limiting patient survival. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a powerful biomarker for MRD detection and monitoring and is a non-invasive approach of treating cancer, and especially NSCLC, based on a real-time assessment of the tumor genomic landscape. In this review, we present the key findings of studies that have used ctDNA with regard to its prognostic value and in respect to the most common druggable driver mutations of genes in NSCLC, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), rearranged during transfection (RET), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS), B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF), and mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor (MET).

The Prognostic Value of a Single, Randomly Timed Circulating Tumor DNA Measurement in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

Simple Summary

In this study, we investigated the associations of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), measured at a random time point during the patient’s treatment, with tumor progression and routine blood markers (protein S100, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and C-reactive protein (CRP)) in a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma. Detectable ctDNA was associated with the presence of extracerebral disease, tumor progression, and poorer overall survival (OS). Elevated S100 and CRP was correlated with detectable ctDNA, whereas LDH was not. Our results further support the use of ctDNA in the clinical management of patients with metastatic melanoma.

Abstract

Melanoma currently lacks validated blood-based biomarkers for monitoring and predicting treatment efficacy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), originating from tumor cells and detectable in plasma, has emerged as a possible biomarker in patients with metastatic melanoma. In this retrospective, single-center study, we collected 129 plasma samples from 79 patients with stage IIIB–IV melanoma as determined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC, 8th edition). For the determination of ctDNA levels, we used eight different assays of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to detect the most common hotspot mutations in the BRAF and NRAS genes. The aim of the study was to investigate the association of the detectability of ctDNA at a non-prespecified time point in a patient’s treatment with tumor progression, and to correlate ctDNA with commonly used biomarkers (protein S100, LDH, and CRP). Patients with detectable ctDNA progressed more frequently in PET-CT within 12 months than those without detectable ctDNA. Detectability of ctDNA was associated with shorter OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. ctDNA was detectable in a statistically significantly larger proportion of patients with distant metastases (79%) than in patients with no distant metastases or only intracranial metastases (32%). Elevated protein S100 and CRP correlated better with detectable ctDNA than LDH. This study supports the potential of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, additional prospective longitudinal studies with quantitative assessments of ctDNA are necessary to investigate the limitations and strengths of ctDNA as a biomarker.

A lead-in safety study followed by a phase 2 clinical trial of dabrafenib, trametinib and hydroxychloroquine in advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma patients previously treated with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Patients with advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma who progressed on prior treatment with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors and programmed cell death 1 or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immune checkpoint inhibitors can benefit from retreatment with the combination of a BRAF- and a MEK-inhibitor ('rechallenge'). Hydroxychloroquine can prevent autophagy-driven resistance and improve the efficacy of BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors in preclinical melanoma models. This clinical trial investigated the use of combined BRAF-/MEK-inhibition with dabrafenib and trametinib plus hydroxychloroquine in patients with advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma who previously progressed on prior treatment with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Following a safety lead-in phase, patients were randomized in the phase 2 part of the trial between upfront treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib and hydroxychloroquine (experimental arm), or dabrafenib and trametinib, with the possibility to add-on hydroxychloroquine at the time of documented tumor progression (contemporary control arm). Ten and four patients were recruited to the experimental and contemporary control arm, respectively. The objective response rate was 20.0% and the disease control rate was 50.0% in the experimental arm, whereas no responses were observed before or after adding hydroxychloroquine in the contemporary control arm. No new safety signals were observed for dabrafenib and trametinib. Hydroxychloroquine was suspected of causing an anxiety/psychotic disorder in one patient. Based on an early negative evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio for adding hydroxychloroquine to dabrafenib and trametinib when 'rechallenging' BRAFV600mutant melanoma patients, recruitment to the trial was closed prematurely.

Circulating Cell-Free DNA and DNA Integrity as Molecular Diagnostic Tools in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the ability to use circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and the DNA integrity index (DNAII) to detect the transition from liver cirrhosis (LC) to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Circulating cfDNA and DNAII were measured in 50 patients with advanced LC and 50 patients with HCC who were followed for 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Fifty healthy participants served as a control group. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to measure circulating cfDNA concentration, and Alu-PCR was used to measure the concentration of Alu repeats, both short fragments (115 base pairs [bp]) and long fragments (247 bp). We compared liquid biopsy results with the relevant traditional markers.

RESULTS

The HCC group showed significantly higher circulating cfDNA concentrations and DNAII values compared with the LC and control groups. No significant differences were found in circulating cfDNA concentrations and DNAII values between the LC and control groups. Circulating cfDNA concentrations decreased significantly after treatment (TACE); areas under the curve of circulating cfDNA concentration and DNAII values were significantly better than those of ɑ-fetoprotein and vascular endothelial growth factor in discriminating between LC and HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of DNAII with proteins induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist showed better diagnostic performance in HCC. Circulating cfDNA could have a potential role in monitoring HCC treatment.

Promising Blood-Based Biomarkers for Melanoma: Recent Progress of Liquid Biopsy and Its Future Perspectives

OPINION STATEMENT

Because the recent success of novel therapeutic approaches has dramatically changed the clinical management of melanoma, less invasive and repeatable monitoring tools that can predict the disease status, drug resistance, and the development of side effects are increasingly needed. As liquid biopsy has enabled us to diagnose and monitor disease status less invasively, substantial attention has been directed toward this technique, which is gaining importance as a diagnostic and/or prognostic tool. It is evident that microRNA, cell-free DNA, and circulating tumor cells obtained via liquid biopsy are promising diagnostic and prognostic tools for melanoma, and they also have utility for monitoring the disease status and predicting drug effects. Although current challenges exist for each biomarker, such as poor sensitivity and/or specificity and technical problems, recent technical advances have increasingly improved these aspects. For example, next-generation sequencing technology for detecting microRNAs or cell-free DNA enabled high-throughput analysis and provided significantly higher sensitivity. In particular, cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing for quantifying cell-free DNA is a promising method for high-throughput analysis that provides real-time comprehensive data for patients at various disease stages. For wide clinical implementation, it is necessary to increase the sensitivity for the markers and standardize the assay procedures to make them reproducible, valid, and inexpensive; however, the broad clinical application of liquid biopsy could occur quickly. This review focuses on the significance of liquid biopsy, particularly related to the use of blood samples from patients with melanoma, and discusses its future perspectives.

Circulating Tumour DNA in Melanoma-Clinic Ready?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liquid biopsies, including circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), can inform a variety of clinical questions. This review examines the potential role of ctDNA as a clinical tool to inform clinical decision-making from early to late stage cutaneous melanoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

In pre-clinical studies, ctDNA has been shown to detect minimal residual disease and molecular relapse; predict and monitor response to therapy; and identify key resistance mechanisms. Here, we examine the potential utility of ctDNA and discuss its limitations for use in patients with melanoma. We present novel clinical trials, which are testing its value as a tool to augment clinical decision-making. Finally, we discuss the steps that are needed to ensure that ctDNA is used optimally in order to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma. Preclinical studies have shown that ctDNA has huge potential to provide real-time information about disease status in patients with melanoma. It is now time to test it rigorously within clinical trials to assess how it can be optimally used to benefit patients in the clinic.

Detection of clinical progression through plasma ctDNA in metastatic melanoma patients: a comparison to radiological progression

BACKGROUND

The validity of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as an indicator of disease progression compared to medical imaging in patients with metastatic melanoma requires detailed evaluation.

METHODS

Here, we carried out a retrospective ctDNA analysis of 108 plasma samples collected at the time of disease progression. We also analysed a validation cohort of 66 metastatic melanoma patients monitored prospectively after response to systemic therapy.

RESULTS

ctDNA was detected in 62% of patients at the time of disease progression. For 67 patients that responded to treatment, the mean ctDNA level at progressive disease was significantly higher than at the time of response (P < 0.0001). However, only 30 of these 67 (45%) patients had a statistically significant increase in ctDNA by Poisson test. A validation cohort of 66 metastatic melanoma patients monitored prospectively indicated a 56% detection rate of ctDNA at progression, with only two cases showing increased ctDNA prior to radiological progression. Finally, a correlation between ctDNA levels and metabolic tumour burden was only observed in treatment naïve patients but not at the time of progression in a subgroup of patients failing BRAF inhibition (N = 15).

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the low efficacy of ctDNA to detect disease progression in melanoma when compared mainly to standard positron emission tomography imaging.

Using All Our Genomes: Blood-based Liquid Biopsies for the Early Detection of Cancer

The pursuit of highly sensitive and specific cancer diagnostics based on cell-free (cf) nucleic acids isolated from minimally invasive liquid biopsies has been an area of intense research and commercial effort for at least two decades. Most of these tests detect cancer-specific mutations or epigenetic modifications on circulating DNA derived from tumor cells (ctDNA). Although recent FDA approvals of both single and multi-analyte liquid biopsy companion diagnostic assays are proof of the tremendous progress made in this domain, using ctDNA for the diagnosis of early-stage (stage I/II) cancers remains challenging due to several factors, such as low mutational allele frequency in circulation, overlapping profiles in genomic alterations among diverse cancers, and clonal hematopoiesis. This review discusses these analytical challenges, interim solutions, and the opportunity to complement ctDNA diagnostics with microbiome-aware analyses that may mitigate several existing ctDNA assay limitations.

OUP accepted manuscript

Circulating biomarkers have emerged as valuable surrogates for evaluating disease states in solid malignancies. Their relative ease of access and rapid turnover has bolstered clinical applications in monitoring treatment efficacy and cancer progression. In this review, the roles of various circulating biomarkers in monitoring treatment response are described. Non-specific markers of disease burden, tumor markers (eg CA 125, CEA, PSA, etc.), circulating tumor cells, nucleic acids, exosomes, and metabolomic arrays are highlighted. Specifically, the discovery of each of these markers is reviewed, with examples illustrating their use in influencing treatment decisions, and barriers to their application noted where these exist. Finally, opportunities for future work using these circulating biomarkers are discussed.

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in metastatic melanoma, a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging biomarker in melanoma. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore its clinical utility as a prognostic, pharmacodynamic (PD) and predictive biomarker.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted from Jan 2015 to April 2021, of the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library and Ovid MEDLINE to identify studies. Studies were restricted to those published in English within the last 5 years, evaluating ctDNA in humans in ≥10 patients. Survival data were extracted for meta-analysis using pooled treatment effect (TE), i.e. log hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding standard error of TE for progression-free survival or overall survival differences in patients who were ctDNA positive or negative. PRISMA statement guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis of 19 studies grouped according to methodology of ctDNA detection, revealed a combined estimate for HR of progression-free survival (13 studies using droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR) methodology (N = 1002) of 2.10 (95% CI: 1.71-2.59) revealing a poorer prognosis when ctDNA was detected. This result was confirmed in the smaller analysis of (non-ddPCR, N = 347) five studies: HR = 2.45 (95% CI: 1.29-4.63). Similar findings were found in the overall survival analysis of nine studies (ddPCR methodology, N = 841) where the combined HR was 2.78 (95% CI: 2.21-3.49) and of the five studies (non-ddPCR methodology, N = 326) where the combined HR was 2.58 (95% CI: 1.74-3.84). Serial ctDNA levels on treatment showed a pharmacodynamic role reflecting response or resistance earlier than radiological assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating tumour DNA is a predictive, prognostic and PD biomarker in melanoma. Technical standardisation of assays is required before clinical adoption.

BRAF V600 Mutation Detection in Plasma Cell-Free DNA: NCCTG N0879 (Alliance)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of detectable circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) BRAF V600E/K mutations in patients with advanced melanoma enrolled in a clinical trial without BRAF-targeted therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

BRAF V600E/K mutation status was determined on archived tissue and pretreatment stored plasma from 149 patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma who were enrolled between May 5, 2010 and May 2, 2014 in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Alliance N0879 randomized phase 2 clinical trial. Results were reported as presence or absence of cfDNA BRAF V600E/K detection of assay vs tissue. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed for patients with and without detectable BRAF mutation.

RESULTS

In total, 63 of 149 (42.3%) patients had BRAF V600E/K results for tissue and blood, and 20 of 63 (31.7%) patients had tissue-diagnosed mutant BRAF. Of these, 11 of 20 (55.0%) patients had detectable plasma cfDNA BRAF. Among patients with tissue-mutant BRAF V600E/K, PFS and OS were shorter for those with corresponding cfDNA mutations (PFS, 5.8 vs 12.0 months; P=.051; OS, 9.2 vs 27.1 months; P=.054). Our assay demonstrated sensitivity of 55% (95% CI, 0.322 to 0.768), specificity of 97.7% (95% CI, 0.932 to 1.000), positive predictive value of 91.7% (95% CI, 0.760 to 1.000), and negative predictive value of 82.4% (95% CI, 0.719 to 0.928).

CONCLUSION

In advanced melanoma, detectable cfDNA BRAF V600E/K mutation is present in about half the patients with stage IV with BRAF-mutant melanoma tumor tissue and appears to confer a poorer prognosis when detectable. Given the poorer prognosis, cfDNA can be used to risk-stratify patients with metastatic melanoma in practice or clinical trials.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00976573.

Liquid Biopsy in Melanoma: Significance in Diagnostics, Prediction and Treatment Monitoring

Liquid biopsy is a common term referring to circulating tumor cells and other biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or extracellular vesicles. Liquid biopsy presents a range of clinical advantages, such as the low invasiveness of the blood sample collection and continuous control of the tumor progression. In addition, this approach enables the mechanisms of drug resistance to be determined in various methods of cancer treatment, including immunotherapy. However, in the case of melanoma, the application of liquid biopsy in patient stratification and therapy needs further investigation. This review attempts to collect all of the relevant and recent information about circulating melanoma cells (CMCs) related to the context of malignant melanoma and immunotherapy. Furthermore, the biology of liquid biopsy analytes, including CMCs, ctDNA, mRNA and exosomes, as well as techniques for their detection and isolation, are also described. The available data support the notion that thoughtful selection of biomarkers and technologies for their detection can contribute to the development of precision medicine by increasing the efficacy of cancer diagnostics and treatment.

Direct comparison study between droplet digital PCR and a combination of allele-specific PCR, asymmetric rapid PCR and melting curve analysis for the detection of BRAF V600E mutation in plasma from melanoma patients

Background In metastatic melanoma, 40%-50% of patients harbor a BRAF V600E mutation and are thereby eligible to receive a combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Compared to standard-of-care tissue-based genetic testing, analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood enables a comprehensive assessment of tumor mutational status in real-time and can be used for monitoring response to therapy. The aim of our study was to directly compare the performance of two highly sensitive methodologies, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and a combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis, for the detection of BRAF V600E in plasma from melanoma patients. Methods Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated from 120 plasma samples of stage I to IV melanoma patients. Identical plasma-cfDNA samples were subjected to BRAF V600E mutational analysis using in parallel, ddPCR and the combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis. Results BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 9/117 (7.7%) ctDNA samples by ddPCR and in 22/117 (18.8%) ctDNA samples by the combination of ARMS/asymmetric- rapid PCR/melting curve analysis. The concordance between these two methodologies was 85.5% (100/117). The comparison of plasma-ctDNA analysis using ddPCR and tissue testing revealed an overall agreement of 79.4% (27/34), while the corresponding agreement using the combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis was 73.5% (25/34). Moreover, comparing the detection of BRAF-mutant ctDNA with the clinics, overall agreement of 87.2% (48/55) for ddPCR and 79.2% (42/53) was demonstrated. Remarkably, the duration of sample storage was negatively correlated with correctness of genotyping results highlighting the importance of pre-analytical factors. Conclusions Our direct comparison study has shown a high level of concordance between ddPCR and the combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations in plasma.

The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to reflect clinical benefits of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the association of pre-treatment and early dynamic changes of ctDNA with clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

Methods

Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane) were systematically searched to include relevant studies published in English up to November 2020. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcome was objective response rate (ORR) with RECIST criteria.

Results

A total of 1017 patients from 10 studies were identified. The baseline ctDNA levels (detected versus not detected) showed no significant association with clinical outcomes regarding OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.51), PFS (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.80-1.21), and ORR (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.54-1.46). Interestingly, when taken early longitudinal assessment of ctDNA into consideration, the early reduction of the concentration of ctDNA was associated with significant improvements of OS (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.10-0.35), PFS (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.41) and ORR (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.03-0.18). Further subgroup analyses revealed that the reduction magnitude did not significantly impact the association between ctDNA and clinical outcomes, suggesting that both patients with decreased ctDNA or a ≥50% reduction of ctDNA was associated with improved OS, PFS and ORR.

Conclusion

Early reduction of ctDNA was associated with improved OS, PFS and ORR in advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, CRD42021226255.

Characterization and Clinical Utility of BRAFV600 Mutation Detection Using Cell-Free DNA in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Simple Summary

The choice of cancer drug(s) for the treatment of advanced melanoma is based on the types of gene alterations that are present in the patient’s tumor(s). Sometimes, the tumor sample that is obtained from surgery may be degraded, and the test does not provide a reliable result, leading to the selection of the wrong treatment, and, consequently, poor outcomes for the patient. Surgery to obtain fresh tumor samples is inconvenient. In recent years, scientists have learned that fragments of genes from dying cells, including tumors, are constantly being released into the blood. This study shows that the presence of altered genes can be reliably determined using easy-to-obtain blood samples. The study also shows that, while there is a small rate of error with the commonly used tests based on the tumor tissue sample, retests using blood samples may be a less invasive and rapid alternative for identifying the BRAF mutation status and selecting the right treatment for these patients.

Abstract

Tissue-based tests for BRAF^V600 mutation-positive melanoma involve invasive biopsy procedures, and can lead to an erroneous diagnosis when the tumor samples degrade. Herein, we explored a minimally invasive, cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA)-based platform, to retest patients for BRAF^V600 mutations. This phase 2 study enrolled adult patients with unresectable/metastatic melanoma. A prescreening testing phase evaluated the concordance between a prior tissue-based BRAF^V600 mutation test result and a subsequent plasma cfDNA-based test result. A treatment phase evaluated the patients who were confirmed as BRAF^V600 mutation-positive, and were treated with cobimetinib plus vemurafenib. It was found that 35/54 patients (64.8%) with a mutant BRAF status by prior tissue test had a positive BRAF^V600 mutation with the cfDNA test. Further, 7/118 patients (5.9%) with a wild-type BRAF status had a positive BRAF^V600 mutation cfDNA test; tissue retests on archival samples confirmed BRAF^V600 mutation positivity in 5/7 patients (71.4%). One of these patients received BRAF pathway-targeted therapy (cobimetinib plus vemurafenib), and had progression-free survival commensurate with previous experience. In the overall cobimetinib plus vemurafenib-treated population, 29/36 patients (80.6%) had an objective response. The median progression-free survival was 13.6 months (95% confidence interval, 9.5–16.5). Cell-free DNA–based tests may be a fast and convenient option to identify BRAF mutation status in melanoma patients, and help inform treatment decisions.

The molecular profiling of solid tumors by liquid biopsy: a position paper of the AIOM-SIAPEC-IAP-SIBioC-SIC-SIF Italian Scientific Societies

The term liquid biopsy (LB) refers to the use of various biological fluids as a surrogate for neoplastic tissue to achieve information for diagnostic, prognostic and predictive purposes. In the current clinical practice, LB is used for the identification of driver mutations in circulating tumor DNA derived from both tumor tissue and circulating neoplastic cells. As suggested by a growing body of evidence, however, there are several clinical settings where biological samples other than tissue could be used in the routine practice to identify potentially predictive biomarkers of either response or resistance to targeted treatments. New applications are emerging as useful clinical tools, and other blood derivatives, such as circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor RNA, microRNAs, platelets, extracellular vesicles, as well as other biofluids such as urine and cerebrospinal fluid, may be adopted in the near future. Despite the evident advantages compared with tissue biopsy, LB still presents some limitations due to both biological and technological issues. In this context, the absence of harmonized procedures corresponds to an unmet clinical need, ultimately affecting the rapid implementation of LB in clinical practice. In this position paper, based on experts’ opinions, the AIOM–SIAPEC-IAP–SIBIOC–SIF Italian Scientific Societies critically discuss the most relevant technical issues of LB, the current and emerging evidences, with the aim to optimizing the applications of LB in the clinical setting.

•

In the current clinical practice LB is used for the identification of driver mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

•

New applications in tumors other than non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are emerging as useful clinical tools.

•

Other blood derivatives, together with other biofluids, are an active field of research and may be adopted in the near future.

•

Despite the evident advantages, liquid biopsy still presents limitations due to both biological and technological issues.

•

Standardization of the procedures needs to be addressed to ensure widespread implementation in clinical practice.

The prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in patients with melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been investigated as a potential prognostic biomarker to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and disease progression in melanoma patients, yet results remain inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the prognostic value of ctDNA in melanoma.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical prognostic value of ctDNA for melanoma patients.

METHODS

Searched for eligible articles from Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between ctDNA at baseline or during treatment and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 9 articles were obtained, involving 617 melanoma patients. The pooled HRs revealed that compared with baseline undetectable ctDNA patients, detectable ctDNA was highly correlated with poor OS (HR 2.91, 95% CI: 2.22-3.82; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 2.75, 95% CI: 1.98-3.83; p < 0.001). A meta-analysis of these adjusted HRs was performed and confirmed that ctDNA collected at baseline was associated with poorer OS/PFS (OS: HR 3.00, 95% CI 2.19-4.11, p < 0.001/PFS: HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.77-4.06, p < 0.001). During treatment, a significant association was shown between ctDNA and poorer OS/PFS (OS: HR 6.26, 95% CI 2.48-15.80, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 4.93, 95% CI 2.36-10.33, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Investigation and application of ctDNA will improve "liquid biopsy" and play a role in early prediction, monitoring disease progression and precise adjusting treatment strategies in melanoma patients.

Case Report: Rechallenge With BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Metastatic Melanoma: A Further Therapeutic Option in Salvage Setting?

BACKGROUND

The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors represents the standard of care treatment for patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma, notwithstanding the high frequency of emergent resistance. Moreover, therapeutic options outside clinical trials are scarce when patients have progressed after both targeted therapy and therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this article, we report our experience with targeted therapy rechallenging with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma after progression with kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy.

METHODS

Four patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma were rechallenged with BRAF and MEK inhibitors after progression with targeted therapy and subsequent immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors).

RESULTS

Two patients (one of them was heavily pretreated) had partial response over 36 months (with local treatment on oligoprogression disease) and 10 months, respectively. A third patient with multisite visceral disease and high serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase had a short-lived clinical benefit rapidly followed by massive progression of disease (early progressor). The fourth patient, currently on treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, is showing a clinical benefit and radiological stable disease over 3 months of therapy. Adverse events were manageable, similar to those reported during the first targeted therapy; the treatment was better tolerated at rechallenge compared with the first treatment by two out of four patients.

Liquid biopsy-based analysis by ddPCR and CAPP-Seq in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

The development of BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma harboring BRAF mutations has garnered attention for liquid biopsy to detect BRAF mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) or next-generation sequencing methods.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate gene mutations in tumor DNA and cfDNA collected from 43 melanoma patients and evaluate their potential as biomarkers.

METHODS

ddPCR and CAncer Personalized Profiling by deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq) techniques were performed to detect gene mutations in plasma cfDNA obtained from patients with metastatic melanoma.

RESULTS

Gene variants, including BRAF, NRAS, TP53, GNAS, and MET, were detectable in the plasma cfDNA, and the results were partially consistent with the results of those identified in the tissues. Among the variants examined, copy numbers of MET mutations were consistent with the disease status in two melanoma patients.

CONCLUSION

Liquid biopsy using CAPP-Seq and ddPCR has the potential to detect tumor presence and mutations, especially when tissue biopsies are unavailable. MET mutations in cfDNA may be a potential biomarker in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Molecular Biomarkers for Melanoma Screening, Diagnosis and Prognosis: Current State and Future Prospects

Despite significant progress in the development of treatment options, melanoma remains a leading cause of death due to skin cancer. Advances in our understanding of the genetic, transcriptomic, and morphologic spectrum of benign and malignant melanocytic neoplasia have enabled the field to propose biomarkers with potential diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive value. While these proposed biomarkers have the potential to improve clinical decision making at multiple critical intervention points, most remain unvalidated. Clinical validation of even the most commonly assessed biomarkers will require substantial resources, including limited clinical specimens. It is therefore important to consider the properties that constitute a relevant and clinically-useful biomarker-based test prior to engaging in large validation studies. In this review article we adapt an established framework for determining minimally-useful biomarker test characteristics, and apply this framework to a discussion of currently used and proposed biomarkers designed to aid melanoma detection, staging, prognosis, and choice of treatment.

Circulating Tumor DNA Early Kinetics Predict Response of Metastatic Melanoma to Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy: Validation Study

The ability of early (first weeks of treatment) ctDNA kinetics to identify primary resistance to anti-PD1 immunotherapies was evaluated with a validation cohort of 49 patients treated with anti-PD1 for metastatic BRAF or NRAS-mutated melanoma, alone and pooled with the 53 patients from a previously described derivation cohort. BRAF or NRAS mutations were quantified on plasma DNA by digital PCR at baseline and after two or four weeks of treatment. ctDNA kinetics were interpreted according to pre-established biological response criteria. A biological progression (bP, i.e., a significant increase in ctDNA levels) at week two or week four was associated with a lack of benefit from anti-PD1 (4-month PFS = 0%; 1-year OS = 13%; n = 12/102). Patients without initial bP had significantly better PFS and OS (4-month PFS = 78%; 1-year OS = 73%; n = 26/102), as did patients whose ctDNA kinetics were not evaluable, due to low/undetectable baseline ctDNA (4-month PFS = 80%; 1-year OS = 81%; n = 64/102). ctDNA detection at first-line anti-PD1 initiation was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis. Overall, early ctDNA quantitative monitoring may allow the detection of primary resistances of metastatic melanoma to anti-PD1 immunotherapies.

The Promise of Liquid Biopsy to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma

Metastatic melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer whose incidence has been rising dramatically over the last few decades. Nowadays, the most successful approach in treating advanced melanoma is immunotherapy which encompasses the use of immune checkpoint blockers able to unleash the immune system's activity against tumor cells. Immunotherapy has dramatically changed clinical practice by contributing to increasing long term overall survival. Despite these striking therapeutic effects, the clinical benefits are strongly mitigated by innate or acquired resistance. In this context, it is of utmost importance to develop methods capable of predicting patient response to immunotherapy. To this purpose, one major step forward may be provided by measuring non-invasive biomarkers in human fluids, namely Liquid Biopsies (LBs). Several LB approaches have been developed over the last few years thanks to technological breakthroughs that have allowed to evaluate circulating components also when they are present in low abundance. The elements of this so-called "circulome" mostly encompass: tumor DNA, tumor and immune cells, soluble factors and non-coding RNAs. Here, we review the current knowledge of these molecules as predictors of response to immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma and predict that LB will soon enter into routine practice in order to guide clinical decisions for cancer immunotherapy.

Circulating tumour DNA in patients with advanced melanoma treated with dabrafenib or dabrafenib plus trametinib: a clinical validation study

BACKGROUND

Melanoma lacks validated blood-based biomarkers for monitoring and predicting treatment efficacy. Cell-free circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker; however, various detection methods have been used, and, to date, no large studies have examined the association between serial changes in ctDNA and survival after BRAF, MEK, or BRAF plus MEK inhibitor therapy. We aimed to evaluate whether baseline ctDNA concentrations and kinetics could predict survival outcomes.

METHODS

In this clinical validation study, we used analytically validated droplet digital PCR assays to measure BRAFV600-mutant ctDNA in pretreatment and on-treatment plasma samples from patients aged 18 years or older enrolled in two clinical trials. COMBI-d (NCT01584648) was a double-blind, randomised phase 3 study of dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib plus placebo in previously untreated patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. COMBI-MB (NCT02039947) was an open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 study evaluating dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma and brain metastases. Patients in cohort A of COMBI-MB had asymptomatic brain metastases, no previous local brain-directed therapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Biomarker analysis was a prespecified exploratory endpoint in both trials and performed in the intention-to-treat populations in COMBI-d and COMBI-MB. We investigated the association between mutant copy number (baseline or week 4 or zero conversion status) and efficacy endpoints (progression-free survival, overall survival, and best overall response). We used Cox models, Kaplan-Meier plots, and log-rank tests to explore the association of pretreatment ctDNA concentrations with progression-free survival and overall survival. The effect of additional prognostic variables such as lactate dehydrogenase was also investigated in addition to the mutant copy number.

FINDINGS

In COMBI-d, pretreatment plasma samples were available from 345 (82%) of 423 patients and on-treatment (week 4) plasma samples were available from 224 (53%) of 423 patients. In cohort A of COMBI-MB, pretreatment and on-treatment samples were available from 38 (50%) of 76 patients with intracranial and extracranial metastatic melanoma. ctDNA was detected in pretreatment samples from 320 (93%) of 345 patients (COMBI-d) and 34 (89%) of 38 patients (COMBI-MB). When assessed as a continuous variable, elevated baseline BRAFV600 mutation-positive ctDNA concentration was associated with worse overall survival outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1·13 [95% CI 1·09-1·18], p<0·0001 by univariate analysis), independent of treatment group and baseline lactate dehydrogenase concentrations (1·08 [1·03-1·13], p=0·0020), in COMBI-d. A ctDNA cutoff point of 64 copies per mL of plasma stratified patients enrolled in COMBI-d as high risk or low risk with respect to survival outcomes (HR 1·74 [95% CI 1·37-2·21], p<0·0001 for progression-free survival; 2·23 [1·73-2·87], p<0·0001 for overall survival) and was validated in the COMBI-MB cohort (3·20 [1·39-7·34], p=0·0047 for progression-free survival; 2·94 [1·18-7·32], p=0·016 for overall survival). In COMBI-d, undetectable ctDNA at week 4 was significantly associated with extended progression-free and overall survival, particularly in patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase concentrations (HR 1·99 [95% CI 1·08-3·64], p=0·027 for progression-free survival; 2·38 [1·24-4·54], p=0·0089 for overall survival).

INTERPRETATION

Pretreatment and on-treatment BRAFV600-mutant ctDNA measurements could serve as independent, predictive biomarkers of clinical outcome with targeted therapy.

FUNDING

Novartis.

Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA as a response and follow-up marker in cancer therapy

Response evaluation for cancer treatment consists primarily of clinical and radiological assessments. In addition, a limited number of serum biomarkers that assess treatment response are available for a small subset of malignancies. Through recent technological innovations, new methods for measuring tumor burden and treatment response are becoming available. By utilization of highly sensitive techniques, tumor-specific mutations in circulating DNA can be detected and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be quantified. These so-called liquid biopsies provide both molecular information about the genomic composition of the tumor and opportunities to evaluate tumor response during therapy. Quantification of tumor-specific mutations in plasma correlates well with tumor burden. Moreover, with liquid biopsies, it is also possible to detect mutations causing secondary resistance during treatment. This review focuses on the clinical utility of ctDNA as a response and follow-up marker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer. Relevant studies were retrieved from a literature search using PubMed database. An overview of the available literature is provided and the relevance of ctDNA as a response marker in anti-cancer therapy for clinical practice is discussed. We conclude that the use of plasma-derived ctDNA is a promising tool for treatment decision-making based on predictive testing, detection of resistance mechanisms, and monitoring tumor response. Necessary steps for translation to daily practice and future perspectives are discussed.

The Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumour DNA in Melanoma Patients Treated with Systemic Therapies-Beyond BRAF Mutant Detection

In this study, we evaluated the predictive value of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to inform therapeutic outcomes in metastatic melanoma patients receiving systemic therapies. We analysed 142 plasma samples from metastatic melanoma patients prior to commencement of systemic therapy: 70 were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and 72 with immunotherapies. Patient-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction assays were designed for ctDNA detection. Plasma ctDNA was detected in 56% of patients prior to first-line anti-PD1 and/or anti-CTLA-4 treatment. The detection rate in the immunotherapy cohort was comparably lower than those with BRAF inhibitors (76%, p = 0.0149). Decreasing ctDNA levels within 12 weeks of treatment was strongly concordant with treatment response (Cohen's k = 0.798, p < 0.001) and predictive of longer progression free survival. Notably, a slower kinetic of ctDNA decline was observed in patients treated with immunotherapy compared to those on BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Whole exome sequencing of ctDNA was also conducted in 9 patients commencing anti-PD-1 therapy to derive tumour mutational burden (TMB) and neoepitope load measurements. The results showed a trend of high TMB and neoepitope load in responders compared to non-responders. Overall, our data suggest that changes in ctDNA can serve as an early indicator of outcomes in metastatic melanoma patients treated with systemic therapies and therefore may serve as a tool to guide treatment decisions.

Circulating tumour DNA and melanoma survival: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

We reviewed and meta-analysed the available evidence (until December 2019) about circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) levels and melanoma patients survival. We included twenty-six studies (>2000 patients overall), which included mostly stage III-IV cutaneous melanoma patients and differed widely in terms of systemic therapy received and somatic mutations that were searched. Patients with detectable ctDNA before treatment had worse progression-free survival (PFS) (summary hazard ratio (SHR) 2.47, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 1.85-3.29) and overall survival (OS) (SHR 2.98, 95 % CI 2.26-3.92), with no difference by tumour stage. ctDNA detectability during follow-up was associated with poorer PFS (SHR 4.27, 95 %CI 2.75-6.63) and OS (SHR 3.91, 95 %CI 1.97-7.78); in the latter case, the association was stronger (p = 0.01) for stage IV vs. III melanomas. Between-estimates heterogeneity was low for all pooled estimates. ctDNA is a strong prognostic biomarker for advanced-stage melanoma patients, robust across tumour (e.g. genomic profile) and patients (e.g. systemic therapy) characteristics.

Microarray-based analysis of the BRAF V600 mutations in circulating tumor DNA in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) holds great potential for cancer therapy and can provide diagnostic and prognostic information before and during treatment.

METHODS

Plasma DNA samples from 97 melanoma patients, 20 healthy donors and 3 patients with benign skin tumors were analyzed by microarray analysis and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).

RESULTS

A microarray for simultaneous detection of six BRAF V600 mutations in ctDNA has been developed. The method allows the detection of 0.05% mutated DNA from WT DNA background. For paired samples (pre-surgery plasma and tumor tissue) isolated from 74 patients, the concordance of genotypes between tumor DNA and ctDNA was 65% (48/74). BRAF mutations in ctDNA were detected in 27/50 patients with BRAF-positive tumors and in 3/24 patients with BRAF wild-type tumors. The presence of ctDNA BRAF mutations in 23 plasma samples from melanoma patients undergoing therapy correlated significantly with tumor progression (P=0.005). The increase in cell-free DNA levels measured by ddPCR also correlated with disease progression (P=0.02). The concordance of results obtained by microarray identification of BRAF mutations and those obtained by ddPCR was 91%.

CONCLUSION

The novel microarray-based approach can be a useful non-invasive tool for accurate identification of ctDNA BRAF mutations to monitor disease progression.

Molecular and Immune Biomarkers for Cutaneous Melanoma: Current Status and Future Prospects

Advances in the genomic, molecular and immunological make-up of melanoma allowed the development of novel targeted therapy and of immunotherapy, leading to changes in the paradigm of therapeutic interventions and improvement of patients' overall survival. Nevertheless, the mechanisms regulating either the responsiveness or the resistance of melanoma patients to therapies are still mostly unknown. The development of either the combinations or of the sequential treatment of different agents has been investigated but without a strongly molecularly motivated rationale. The need for robust biomarkers to predict patients' responsiveness to defined therapies and for their stratification is still unmet. Progress in immunological assays and genomic techniques as long as improvement in designing and performing studies monitoring the expression of these markers along with the evolution of the disease allowed to identify candidate biomarkers. However, none of them achieved a definitive role in predicting patients' clinical outcomes. Along this line, the cross-talk of melanoma cells with tumor microenvironment plays an important role in the evolution of the disease and needs to be considered in light of the role of predictive biomarkers. The overview of the relationship between the molecular basis of melanoma and targeted therapies is provided in this review, highlighting the benefit for clinical responses and the limitations. Moreover, the role of different candidate biomarkers is described together with the technical approaches for their identification. The provided evidence shows that progress has been achieved in understanding the molecular basis of melanoma and in designing advanced therapeutic strategies. Nevertheless, the molecular determinants of melanoma and their role as biomarkers predicting patients' responsiveness to therapies warrant further investigation with the vision of developing more effective precision medicine.

The Role of Dynamic ctDNA Monitoring During Combination Therapies of BRAF V600E-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

BRAF V600E mutation represents a group of colorectal carcinoma with poor prognosis. Although treatment strategies have been recommended after clinical investigations, the progression-free survival is short and unsatisfying.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we present the case of a 28-year-old male diagnosed with ascending colon adenocarcinoma with multiple liver metastases. Treatment with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab and vemurafenib achieved partial response, following which the patient received conversion surgery with clear resection margin. After disease recurrence, he received combination treatment of nivolumab and regorafenib. Until August 2020, the patient achieved a partial response with more than 12 months progression-free survival. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was monitored during the patient's treatment. His ctDNA fractions exhibited significant elevation two months before disease progression. As a comparison, the tumor markers were not elevated until the patient was confirmed PD through CT imaging.

CONCLUSION

This case exemplifies how liquid biopsy and ctDNA sequencing can aid in real-time molecular characterization of tumors.

Stopping targeted therapy for complete responders in advanced BRAF mutant melanoma

BRAF inhibitors revolutionised the management of melanoma patients and although resistance occurs, there is a subgroup of patients who maintain durable disease control. For those cases with durable complete response (CR) it is not clear whether it is safe to cease therapy. Here we identified 13 patients treated with BRAF +/- MEK inhibitors, who cease therapy after prolonged CR (median = 34 months, range 20-74). Recurrence was observed in 3/13 (23%) patients. In the remaining 10 patients with sustained CR off therapy, the median follow up after discontinuation was 19 months (range 8-36). We retrospectively measured ctDNA levels using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in longitudinal plasma samples. CtDNA levels were undetectable in 11/13 cases after cessation and remained undetectable in patients in CR (10/13). CtDNA eventually became detectable in 2/3 cases with disease recurrence, but remained undetectable in 1 patient with brain only progression. Our study suggests that consideration could be given to ceasing targeted therapy in the context of prolonged treatment, durable response and no evidence of residual disease as measured by ctDNA.

miR-524-5p reduces the progression of the BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma

BRAF inhibitors were approved for the treatment of BRAF-mutant melanoma. However, most patients acquire the resistance to BRAF inhibitors after several months of treatment. miR-524-5p is considered as a tumor suppressor in many cancers, including melanoma. In this study, we investigated the biological functions of miR-524-5p in melanoma with acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitor and evaluated the endogenous miR-524-5p expression as a biomarker for melanoma. The results showed that the expression of miR-524-5p was 0.481-fold lower in melanoma tissues (n = 117) than in nevus tissues (n = 40). Overexpression of miR-524-5p significantly reduced proliferative, anchorage-independent growth, migratory and invasive abilities of BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells. Moreover, the introduction of miR-524-5p led to a reduced development of BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma in vivo. Remarkably, the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway was decreased after treatment with miR-524-5p. Furthermore, next-generation sequencing analysis implied that the complement system, leukocyte extravasation, liver X receptor/retinoid-X-receptor activation, and cAMP-mediated signaling may be related to miR-524-5p-induced pathways in the resistant cells. The miR-524-5p level was higher on average in complete response and long-term partial response patients than in progressive disease and short-term partial response patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. Our results proposed that miR-524-5p could be considered as a target for treatment BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma and a prognostic marker in the response of patients to BRAF inhibitors for melanoma.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection is associated with shorter progression-free survival in advanced melanoma patients

BRAF, NRAS and TERT mutations occur in more than 2/3 of melanomas. Its detection in patient's blood, as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), represents a possibility for identification and monitoring of metastatic disease. We proposed to standardize a liquid biopsy platform to identify hotspot mutations in BRAF, NRAS and TERT in plasma samples from advanced melanoma patients and investigate whether it was associated to clinical outcome. Firstly, we performed digital polymerase chain reaction using tumor cell lines for validation and determination of limit of detection (LOD) of each assay and screened plasma samples from healthy individuals to determine the limit of blank (LOB). Then, we selected 19 stage III and IV patients and determined the somatic mutations status in tumor tissue and track them in patients' plasma. We established a specific and sensitive methodology with a LOD ranging from 0.13 to 0.37%, and LOB ranging from of 0 to 5.201 copies/reaction. Somatic mutations occurred in 17/19 (89%) patients, of whom seven (41%) had ctDNA detectable their paired plasma. ctDNA detection was associated with shorter progression free survival (p = 0.01). In conclusion, our data support the use of ctDNA as prognosis biomarker, suggesting that patients with detectable levels have an unfavorable outcome.

Circulating Tumor DNA Testing Opens New Perspectives in Melanoma Management

Malignant melanoma accounts for about 1% of all skin cancers, but it causes most of the skin cancer-related deaths. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing is emerging as a relevant tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of cancer. The availability of highly sensitive techniques, including next generation sequencing (NGS)-based panels, has increased the fields of application of ctDNA testing. While ctDNA-based tests for the early detection of melanoma are not available yet, perioperative ctDNA analysis in patients with surgically resectable melanoma offers relevant prognostic information: i) the detection of ctDNA before surgery correlates with the extent and the aggressiveness of the disease; ii) ctDNA testing after surgery/adjuvant therapy identifies minimal residual disease; iii) testing ctDNA during the follow-up can detect a tumor recurrence, anticipating clinical/radiological progression. In patients with advanced melanoma, several studies have demonstrated that the analysis of ctDNA can better depict tumor heterogeneity and provides relevant prognostic information. In addition, ctDNA testing during treatment allows assessing the response to systemic therapy and identifying resistance mechanisms. Although validation in prospective clinical trials is needed for most of these approaches, ctDNA testing opens up new scenarios in the management of melanoma patients that could lead to improvements in the diagnosis and therapy of this disease.

Decoding the evolutionary response to prostate cancer therapy by plasma genome sequencing

BACKGROUND

Investigating genome evolution in response to therapy is difficult in human tissue samples. To address this challenge, we develop an unbiased whole-genome plasma DNA sequencing approach that concurrently measures genomic copy number and exome mutations from archival cryostored plasma samples. This approach is applied to study longitudinal blood plasma samples from prostate cancer patients, where longitudinal tissue biopsies from the bone and other metastatic sites have been challenging to collect.

RESULTS

A molecular characterization of archival plasma DNA from 233 patients and genomic profiling of 101 patients identifies clinical correlations of aneuploid plasma DNA profiles with poor survival, increased plasma DNA concentrations, and lower plasma DNA size distributions. Deep-exome sequencing and genomic copy number profiling are performed on 23 patients, including 9 patients with matched metastatic tissues and 12 patients with serial plasma samples. These data show a high concordance in genomic alterations between the plasma DNA and metastatic tissue samples, suggesting the plasma DNA is highly representative of the tissue alterations. Longitudinal sequencing of 12 patients with 2-5 serial plasma samples reveals clonal dynamics and genome evolution in response to hormonal and chemotherapy. By performing an integrated evolutionary analysis, minor subclones are identified in 9 patients that expanded in response to therapy and harbored mutations associated with resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an unbiased evolutionary approach to non-invasively delineate clonal dynamics and identify clones with mutations associated with resistance in prostate cancer.

The Current State of Molecular Testing in the BRAF-Mutated Melanoma Landscape

The incidence of melanoma, among the most lethal cancers, is widespread and increasing. Metastatic melanoma has a poor prognosis, representing about 90% of skin cancer mortality. The increased knowledge of tumor biology and the greater understanding of the immune system role in the anti-tumor response has allowed us to develop a more rational approach to systemic therapies. The discovery of activating BRAF mutations in half of all melanomas has led to the development of molecularly targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, which dramatically improved outcomes of patients with stage IV BRAF-mutant melanoma. More recently, the results of clinical phase III studies conducted in the adjuvant setting led to the combined administration of BRAF and MEK inhibitors also in patients with resected high-risk melanoma (stage III). Therefore, BRAF mutation testing has become a priority to determine the oncologist's choice and course of therapy. In this review, we will report the molecular biology-based strategies used for BRAF mutation detection with the main advantages and disadvantages of the most commonly used diagnostic strategies. The timing of such molecular assessment in patients with cutaneous melanoma will be discussed, and we will also examine considerations and approaches for accurate and effective BRAF testing.

Clinical Perspective and Translational Oncology of Liquid Biopsy

The term liquid biopsy (LB) refers to the study of circulating tumor cells, circulating tumors nucleic acids free of cells or contained in exosomes, and information about platelets associated with tumors. LB can be performed in different biofluids and allows the limitations of tissue biopsy to be overcome offering possibilities of tumor identification reflecting in real time tumor heterogeneity. In addition, LB allows screening and early detection of cancer, real-time monitoring of therapy, stratification and therapeutic intervention, a therapeutic target and resistance mechanism, and a risk of metastatic relapse. Currently, LB has been shown to be effective for its application in different types of tumors including lung, colorectal, prostate, melanoma, breast and pancreatic cancer, by the determination and identification of biomarkers that with a high probability have the potential to change the way in which medical oncology could predict the course of the disease. These biomarkers make it possible to capture the heterogeneity of the cancer, monitor its clonal evolution, indicate new treatments or retreatments and evaluate the responses to different evolutionary and/or therapeutic pressures in the cancer disease.

Circulating Tumor DNA Correlates with Outcome in Metastatic Melanoma Treated by BRAF and MEK Inhibitors - Results of a Prospective Biomarker Study

Purpose

BRAF and MEK inhibitors significantly improved the prognosis of metastatic melanoma. Nevertheless, initial treatment response may be only temporary. Liquid biopsies (LB) offer a possibility to monitor patients by measuring circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). We sought to find out whether ctDNA can be used to reliably determine progressive disease under targeted therapy. In addition, we wanted to check whether ctDNA may represent a possible prognostic marker for survival.

Patients and Methods

We included 19 melanoma patients with BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy. For each patient, a 710 gene panel was analyzed on the latest available tumor tissue before the start of therapy. Repetitive LB were collected in which BRAF V600E/K mutations were monitored using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). We correlated radiological staging results and overall survival with ctDNA results.

Results

In 13 patients, ctDNA was detectable when starting targeted therapy, whereas in six patients, ddPCR was always negative, which we confirmed with ultra-deep sequencing. All patients with initially detectable ctDNA had ctDNA values declining to zero during follow-up, increasing again at the time of extracerebral progression or even slightly before detection by imaging. Survival was significantly worse for patients with elevated LDH (p=0.034) or detectable ctDNA (p=0.008) at the start of targeted therapy.

Conclusion

Therapy monitoring by ctDNA seems to be a reliable method for detecting extracranial progression, even more sensitive and specific than LDH or S100B. However, due to the small number of cases in our study, further studies are necessary.