Response to treatment with intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide and triamcinolone acetonide in oligo articular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

The effect of intra-articular steroid injection on the cartilage and tendon thicknesses in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI) is a safe first-line or adjunct therapy used in any subtype of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Limited studies evaluated the effect of IACI on cartilage. Our study aimed to examine the femoral cartilage thickness of patients with JIA who received IACI to the knee joint using ultrasound.

METHODS

We randomly selected JIA patients who performed IACI in the knee joint. Baseline bilateral joint cartilage and tendon thicknesses were measured. The articular fluid was aspirated, and applied IACI at the same period. Six months after injection, the exact measurements were repeated. Distal femoral cartilage, quadriceps tendon, and distal and proximal patellar tendon thicknesses were compared at the baseline (before IACI) and 6 months after IACI.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with JIA were included, and 23 (76.7%) were female. The median age was 11 years (interquartile range, 6 to 14), and the median disease duration was 3.3 years (interquartile range, 5 months to 5 years). The subtypes of JIA were oligoarticular in 25 (83.3%), polyarticular in 2 (6.7%), enthesitis-related arthritis in 2 (6.7%), and juvenile psoriatic arthritis in 1 (3.3%). Distal femoral cartilage thickness was 2.96 ± 0.79 mm at baseline and 2.85 ± 0.70 mm at 6 months after IACI (P = .35). The tendon thicknesses were similar at 6 months after baseline measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal that knee IACI in patients with JIA did not significantly change cartilage and tendon thicknesses. This observation could indicate that IACIs have no detrimental effects on the cartilage and the tendons.

Ultrasonographic evaluation of changes in the joint before and after intra-articular injection in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to ultrasonographically (US) evaluate the course of the knee joint in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients who received intra-articular steroid (IAS) application to the knee joint.

METHODS

237 knee joints of 175 patients with oligoarticular JIA were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received only IAS therapy and those who were methotrexate to IAS therapy. Synovial fluid grade changes, synovial proliferation in B mode examination and power Doppler (PD) changes were evaluated with musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) separately for each joint before the treatment and at the 2nd, 6th and 12th weeks of the treatment.

RESULTS

The percentages of regression in synovial fluid grade at the second, sixth, and 12th weeks were respectively 73.4%, 88.6%, and 89.0% (n=174, 210, 211, respectively). Meanwhile, the percentages of regression in PD grade were 69.2%, 82.7%, and 84.0% (n=164, 196, 199, respectively). At the second, sixth and 12th weeks, the percentage of those with synovial fluid grade 0 was 24.1%, 54.9%, 73.4%, respectively (n=57, 130, 174, respectively), while the percentage of those with PD grade 0 was 39.7%, 67.9%, 80.6%, respectively (n=94,161,191, respectively). The percentage of those without synovial proliferation in the second, sixth and 12th weeks was found to be 26.2%, 54.9%, 73.8% respectively (n=62, 130, 175, respectively). The mean time to regression of synovial fluid, synovial proliferation, and PD in the only IAS group was significantly short. The percentage of synovitis regression was higher in the only IAS group at all weeks. This difference was especially more pronounced in the early period. When the 12th-week results were evaluated, there was no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the utility of MSUS in evaluating the early results of IAS therapy applied to the knee joint in oligoarticular JIA patients.

Surgical Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in the Era of Novel Drug Therapies

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common chronic rheumatic disease encountered in children under the age of sixteen and causes significant impairments in daily life. Over the last two decades, the introduction of new drug treatments (including disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologics) has changed the course of this disease, thus reducing the indication for surgery. However, some patients fail to respond to drug therapy and thus require personalized surgical management, e.g., the local reduction of joint effusion or a synovial pannus (via intra-articular corticosteroid injections, synovectomy, or soft tissue release), and management of the sequelae of arthritis (such as growth disorders and joint degeneration). Here, we provide an overview of the surgical indications and outcomes of the following interventions: intra-articular corticosteroid injections, synovectomy, soft tissue release, surgery for growth disorders, and arthroplasty.

Outcomes of intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide injection in children with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to explore the response to intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection in children with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and factors associated with time to arthritis flare.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of children with non-systemic JIA who received intraarticular TA injections at a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Response to intraarticular TA injection was defined as absence of arthritis at 6 months after procedure. Time from joint injection to arthritis flare was recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with logarithmic rank test and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used for outcome analyses.

RESULTS

Intraarticular TA injection was performed in 177 joints among 45 children with non-systemic JIA, most common in the knees (57 joints, 32.2%). Response to intraarticular TA injection at 6 months was observed in 118 joints (66.7%). Ninety-seven joints (54.8%) had arthritis flare following injection. The median time to arthritis flare was 12.65 months (95%CI 8.20-17.10 months). The significant risk factor associated with arthritis flare was the JIA subtypes other than persistent oligoarthritis (HR 2.62, 95%CI 1.085-6.325, p = 0.032); the significant protective factor was concomitant sulfasalazine use (HR 0.326, 95%CI 0.109-0.971, p = 0.044). Adverse effects included pigmentary changes (3, 1.7%) and skin atrophy (2, 1.1%).

CONCLUSION

Intraarticular TA injection in children with non-systemic JIA had favorable response in two thirds of injected joints at 6 months. The JIA subtypes other than persistent oligoarthritis was a predictor of arthritis flare following intraarticular TA injection. Key Points • Intraarticular TA injection in children with non-systemic JIA had a favorable response in two-thirds of injected joints at 6 months. • The median time from intraarticular TA injection to arthritis flare was 12.65 months. • The risk factor predicting arthritis flare was the JIA subtypes other than persistent oligoarthritis (extended oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, ERA, and undifferentiated JIA), while the concomitant use of sulfasalazine was a protective factor. • Local adverse reactions from intraarticular TA injection were less than 2% of injected joints.

Intraarticular steroids as DMARD-sparing agents for juvenile idiopathic arthritis flares: Analysis of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

BACKGROUND

Children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who achieve a drug free remission often experience a flare of their disease requiring either intraarticular steroids (IAS) or systemic treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). IAS offer an opportunity to recapture disease control and avoid exposure to side effects from systemic immunosuppression. We examined a cohort of patients treated with IAS after drug free remission and report the probability of restarting systemic treatment within 12 months.

METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of patients from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry who received IAS for a flare after a period of drug free remission. Historical factors and clinical characteristics and of the patients including data obtained at the time of treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 46 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of those with follow up data available 49% had restarted systemic treatment 6 months after IAS injection and 70% had restarted systemic treatment at 12 months. The proportion of patients with prior use of a biologic DMARD was the only factor that differed between patients who restarted systemic treatment those who did not, both at 6 months (79% vs 35%, p < 0.01) and 12 months (81% vs 33%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While IAS are an option for all patients who flare after drug free remission, it may not prevent the need to restart systemic treatment. Prior use of a biologic DMARD may predict lack of success for IAS. Those who previously received methotrexate only, on the other hand, are excellent candidates for IAS.

What are the factors associated with the duration of remission of intra-articular corticosteroid injection in juvenile idiopathic arthritis?

INTRODUCTION

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI) is generally used in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to obtain rapid relief of active synovitis and functional recovery and to prevent the need for regular systemic therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of IACI treatment and the factors associated with remission of synovitis.

METHODS

The clinical records of JIA patients who received IACI between January 2014 and December 2020 in two pediatric rheumatology centers were reviewed. The procedure was evaluated in terms of efficacy, factors that may affect the duration of remission, procedural and drug-related complications.

RESULTS

During the study period, 134 patients received 227 injections and 37 joints were injected more than once. One hundred and six (79%) patients had persistent oligoarticular disease. At the time of injection, all patients were receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 74 patients were on methotrexate, and 14 patients were on biologics. The median duration of remission without exacerbation of synovitis treated with IACI was 15 (range 1-64) months. The inactivity rate was 81% at the 6th month after the injection. It has been shown that being less than 7 years old at disease onset and low initial CRP levels were correlated with a long remission period (p < 0.05). Despite the differences were not statistically significant, the duration of remission was longer in boys, in ANA positives, in HLA-B27 negatives, in patients with concurrent methotrexate treatment and in patients not receiving biologic therapy (p > 0.05). Only two patients (1.5%, 95% CI - 0.6 to 3.5) developed cutaneous hypopigmentation and subcutaneous atrophy as side effects of injection.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection was more effective especially in patients with low initial CRP levels and younger than 7 years of age. The duration of remission was longer in these patients. Key Points • Intra-articular corticosteroid injection is an effective method for controlling joint inflammation and achieving long-term remission without significant side effects. • Intra-articular corticosteroid injection can be preferred in all forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis as primary therapy or to relieve the patient while waiting for the effect of systemic agents or to avoid increasing the dose of systemic drugs. • It can be recommended as a treatment option at any stage of the disease, especially in young patients and patients with low initial CRP values.