Childhood-Onset Lupus Nephritis in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry: Short-Term Kidney Status and Variation in Care

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to characterize short-term kidney status and describe variation in early care utilization in a multicenter cohort of patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) and nephritis.

METHODS

We analyzed previously collected prospective data from North American patients with cSLE with kidney biopsy-proven nephritis enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry from March 2017 through December 2019. We determined the proportion of patients with abnormal kidney status at the most recent registry visit and applied generalized linear mixed models to identify associated factors. We also calculated frequency of medication use, both during induction and ever recorded.

RESULTS

We identified 222 patients with kidney biopsy-proven nephritis, with 64% class III/IV nephritis on initial biopsy. At the most recent registry visit at median (interquartile range) of 17 (8-29) months from initial kidney biopsy, 58 of 106 patients (55%) with available data had abnormal kidney status. This finding was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.21-12.46) and age at cSLE diagnosis (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.49). Patients with class IV nephritis were more likely than class III to receive cyclophosphamide and rituximab during induction. There was substantial variation in mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab ever use patterns across rheumatology centers.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort with predominately class III/IV nephritis, male sex and older age at cSLE diagnosis were associated with abnormal short-term kidney status. We also observed substantial variation in contemporary medication use for pediatric lupus nephritis between pediatric rheumatology centers. Additional studies are needed to better understand the impact of this variation on long-term kidney outcomes.

Intraarticular steroids as DMARD-sparing agents for juvenile idiopathic arthritis flares: Analysis of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

BACKGROUND

Children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who achieve a drug free remission often experience a flare of their disease requiring either intraarticular steroids (IAS) or systemic treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). IAS offer an opportunity to recapture disease control and avoid exposure to side effects from systemic immunosuppression. We examined a cohort of patients treated with IAS after drug free remission and report the probability of restarting systemic treatment within 12 months.

METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of patients from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry who received IAS for a flare after a period of drug free remission. Historical factors and clinical characteristics and of the patients including data obtained at the time of treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 46 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of those with follow up data available 49% had restarted systemic treatment 6 months after IAS injection and 70% had restarted systemic treatment at 12 months. The proportion of patients with prior use of a biologic DMARD was the only factor that differed between patients who restarted systemic treatment those who did not, both at 6 months (79% vs 35%, p < 0.01) and 12 months (81% vs 33%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While IAS are an option for all patients who flare after drug free remission, it may not prevent the need to restart systemic treatment. Prior use of a biologic DMARD may predict lack of success for IAS. Those who previously received methotrexate only, on the other hand, are excellent candidates for IAS.

Social determinants of health influence disease activity and functional disability in Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDH) greatly influence outcomes during the first year of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis, a disease similar to polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA). We investigated the correlation of community poverty level and other SDH with the persistence of moderate to severe disease activity and functional disability over the first year of treatment in pJIA patients enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry.

METHODS

In this cohort study, unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear mixed effects models analyzed the effect of community poverty and other SDH on disease activity, using the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-10, and disability, using the Child Health Assessment Questionnaire, measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

One thousand six hundred eighty-four patients were identified. High community poverty (≥20% living below the federal poverty level) was associated with increased odds of functional disability (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.28-2.60) but was not statistically significant after adjustment (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.81-1.86) and was not associated with increased disease activity. Non-white race/ethnicity was associated with higher disease activity (aOR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.41-4.36). Lower self-reported household income was associated with higher disease activity and persistent functional disability. Public insurance (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.29) and low family education (aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.14-3.12) was associated with persistent functional disability.

CONCLUSION

High community poverty level was associated with persistent functional disability in unadjusted analysis but not with persistent moderate to high disease activity. Race/ethnicity and other SDH were associated with persistent disease activity and functional disability.

AB1059 A RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF ANAKINRA IN PATIENTS WITH STILL´S DISEASE

Background:

Adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) are rare autoinflammatory disorders associated with an activated IL-1 pathway, characterized by spiking fever, rash, arthritis, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly and serositis. There is a growing understanding that SJIA and AOSD are one disease with different ages of onset, i.e. Still’s disease. The anaSTILLs study (anakinra inStill´sdisease) was designed to further evaluate efficacy and safety of anakinra in patients with Still´s disease across all age groups.

Objectives:

The primary objective was to demonstrate efficacy of anakinra versus placebo as assessed by ACR30 response with absence of fever at Week 2. Secondary objectives included: early onset of efficacy, sustained efficacy, time to study drug discontinuation, safety, pharmacokinetics, clinical signs and biomarkers.

Methods:

‘anaSTILLs’ was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study including patients with active and newly diagnosed (6 months) Still´s disease according to adapted ILAR criteria if <16, or Yamaguchi criteria, if ≥16 years of age at disease onset. Patients were randomized to anakinra 2 mg/kg (max 100 mg/day), 4 mg/kg (max 200 mg/day) or placebo.

Results:

12 patients were randomized and received study drug: 6 anakinra (2 mg/kg n=2, 4 mg/kg n=4) and 6 placebo, the study was terminated early due to slow recruitment. 1 patient on placebo had lymphoma, not Still’s disease, and was excluded; thus in total 11 patients were analyzed for efficacy, 8 were children [median (range) age=4.0 (1-11) years] and 3 were adults [median (range) age=32.0 (25-51) years]. 55% were male and the mean symptom duration was 74.2 days. All patients on anakinra but none on placebo achieved ACR30 response with absence of fever at Week 2 (p-value=0.0022). The efficacy of anakinra was further demonstrated by superiority to placebo in ACR50/70/90 responses with absence of fever at Week 2. All placebo patients discontinued the study within 6 weeks, 2 due to progressive disease, 2 due to lack of efficacy and 1 due to withdrawal by patient. There was a numerically higher proportion with early onset of efficacy (Week 1) in the anakinra group compared to placebo. The ACR30/50/70/90 responses in the anakinra group were sustained throughout the study period. Patients in the anakinra group had a prompt and persistent decrease in CRP and ferritin levels at Week 1, which was not observed in the placebo group. There were no unexpected safety findings. All anakinra patients developed anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) at some timepoint during the study. ADAs were persistent throughout the treatment period, except in one patient. Titers were low to moderate. One placebo patient had low ADA titers at one occasion. No neutralizing antibodies were observed and the ADAs did not appear to impact clinical efficacy or safety.

Conclusion:

Anakinra is superior to placebo in the treatment of Still’s disease. ADAs occur frequently but do not appear to adversely impact efficacy or safety. These results confirm the benefits of anakinra treatment in patients with active, newly diagnosed Still´s disease across ages.

Disclosure of Interests:

Laura Schanberg Grant/research support from: Sobi, BMS, Consultant of: Aurinia, UCB, Sanofi, Peter Nigrovic Grant/research support from: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Consultant of: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Sobi, Miach Orthopedics, Simcere, XBiotech, Quench Bio, Ashley Cooper: None declared, Winn Chatham Grant/research support from: Sobi, Consultant of: Sobi, Shoghik Akoghlanian: None declared, Namrata Singh: None declared, Egla Rabinovich Grant/research support from: AbbVie, UCB Pharma, Janssen Research & Development, Akaluck Thatayatikom: None declared, Alysha Taxter: None declared, Jonathan Hausmann Consultant of: Novartis, Milan Zdravkovic Shareholder of: Sobi, Employee of: Sobi, Sven Ohlman Shareholder of: Sobi, Employee of: Former employee of Sobi, Henrik Andersson Employee of: Sobi, Susanna Cederholm Shareholder of: Sobi, Employee of: Sobi, Margareta Wikén Shareholder of: Sobi, Employee of: Former employee of Sobi, Rayfel Schneider Grant/research support from: Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, Consultant of: Sobi, Novartis, Novimmune, Fabrizio De Benedetti Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Novimmune, Sobi, Sanofi, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Roche, Sobi

Relation between house-dust endotoxin exposure, type 1 T-cell development, and allergen sensitisation in infants at high risk of asthma

BACKGROUND

Bacterial endotoxin is known to induce interferon gamma and interleukin 12 production, and therefore has the potential to decrease allergen sensitisation. To find out the role of early chronic endotoxin exposure in the development of allergen sensitisation and asthma, we compared concentrations of endotoxin in house dust with allergen sensitisation in infants at high risk for developing asthma.

METHODS

61 infants 9-24 months old with at least three physician-documented episodes of wheezing were studied. Concentrations of house-dust endotoxin and allergens were measured in the infants' homes. Allergen sensitisation was measured by skin-prick testing with a panel of common inhalant and food allergens. In a subset of these infants, proportions of T lymphocytes producing interferon gamma, and interleukins 4, 5, and 13 were calculated by cell-surface and intracellular cytokine staining, with flow cytometry.

FINDINGS

House-dust endotoxin concentrations ranged from 104 to 10,000 endotoxin units (EU) per mL (geometric mean 912 EU/mL). Concentrations did not vary significantly over a 6-month interval. Ten infants (16%) were sensitised to at least one allergen. The homes of allergen-sensitised infants contained significantly lower concentrations of house-dust endotoxin than those of non-sensitised infants (mean 468 vs 1035 EU/mL, respectively; p=0.01). Increased house-dust endotoxin concentrations correlated with increased proportions of interferon-gamma-producing CD4 T cells (p=0.01). Such concentrations did not correlate with proportions of cells that produced interleukins 4, 5, or 13.

INTERPRETATION

This study may provide the first direct in-vivo evidence that indoor endotoxin exposure early in life may protect against allergen sensitisation by enhancing type 1 immunity.