1
|
Hettiarachchi Senarath GM, Delir Haghighi P, Bai L, Shannon MM, Andrew NE, Srikanth V, Snowdon DA, O’Connor DA. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of electronic collection and use of patient-reported measures in routine care of older adults: a systematic review with qualitative evidence synthesis. JAMIA Open 2024; 7:ooae068. [PMID: 39100988 PMCID: PMC11296862 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The aims of this systematic review were to (1) synthesize the available qualitative evidence on the barriers and facilitators influencing implementation of the electronic collection and use of patient-reported measures (PRMs) in older adults' care from various stakeholder perspectives and (2) map these factors to the digital technology implementation framework Non-adoption, Abandonment, challenges to the Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability (NASSS) and behavior change framework Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B). Materials and Methods A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science databases from 1 January 2001 to 27 October 2021 was conducted and included English language qualitative studies exploring stakeholder perspectives on the electronic collection and use of PRMs in older adults' care. Two authors independently screened studies, conducted data extraction, quality appraisal using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), data coding, assessed confidence in review findings using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE CERQual), and mapped the findings to NASSS and COM-B. An inductive approach was used to synthesize findings describing the stakeholder perspectives of barriers and facilitators. Results Twenty-two studies were included from the 3368 records identified. Studies explored older adult, caregiver, healthcare professional, and administrative staff perspectives. Twenty nine of 34 review findings (85%) were graded as having high or moderate confidence. Key factors salient to older adults related to clinical conditions and socio-cultural factors, digital literacy, access to digital technology, and user interface. Factors salient to healthcare professionals related to resource availability to collect and use PRMs, and value of PRMs collection and use. Conclusion Future efforts to implement electronic collection and use of PRMs in older adults' care should consider addressing the barriers, facilitators, and key theoretical domains identified in this review. Older adults are more likely to adopt electronic completion of PRMs when barriers associated with digital technology access, digital literacy, and user interface are addressed. Future research should explore the perspectives of other stakeholders, including those of organizational leaders, digital technology developers and implementation specialists, in various healthcare settings and explore factors influencing implementation of PREMs. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022295894.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pari Delir Haghighi
- Department of Human-Centred Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Lu Bai
- Department of Human-Centred Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Michelle M Shannon
- Academic Unit, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
| | - Nadine E Andrew
- Academic Unit, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
| | - Velandai Srikanth
- Academic Unit, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
| | - David A Snowdon
- Academic Unit, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
| | - Denise A O’Connor
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singer S, Sykiotis G, Al-Ibraheem A, Pinto M, Iakovou I, Østhus AA, Hammerlid E, Locati LD, Gamper EM, Arraras JI, Jordan S, Buettner M, Engesser D, Taylor K, Canotilho R, Ioannidis G, Husson O, Gama RR, Fanetti G, Moss L, Inhestern J, Andry G, Rimmele H, Kiyota N. The impact of electronic versus paper-based data capture on data collection logistics and on missing scores in thyroid cancer patients. Endocrine 2024; 84:635-645. [PMID: 38103143 PMCID: PMC11076317 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-023-03628-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the type of data capture on the time and help needed for collecting patient-reported outcomes as well as on the proportion of missing scores. METHODS In a multinational prospective study, thyroid cancer patients from 17 countries completed a validated questionnaire measuring quality of life. Electronic data capture was compared to the paper-based approach using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 437 patients were included, of whom 13% used electronic data capture. The relation between data capture and time needed was modified by the emotional functioning of the patients. Those with clinical impairments in that respect needed more time to complete the questionnaire when they used electronic data capture compared to paper and pencil (ORadj 24.0; p = 0.006). This was not the case when patients had sub-threshold emotional problems (ORadj 1.9; p = 0.48). The odds of having the researcher reading the questions out (instead of the patient doing this themselves) (ORadj 0.1; p = 0.01) and of needing any help (ORadj 0.1; p = 0.01) were lower when electronic data capture was used. The proportion of missing scores was equivalent in both groups (ORadj 0.4, p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS The advantages of electronic data capture, such as real-time assessment and fewer data entry errors, may come at the price of more time required for data collection when the patients have mental health problems. As this is not uncommon in thyroid cancer, researchers need to choose the type of data capture wisely for their particular research question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Singer
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
- University Cancer Centre, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Gerasimos Sykiotis
- Service of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Akram Al-Ibraheem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Monica Pinto
- Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Strategic Health Services Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Ioannis Iakovou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Arild Andre Østhus
- ENT and Head and Neck Department, University Medical Centre Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva Hammerlid
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Laura Deborah Locati
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Eva Maria Gamper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Susan Jordan
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Matthias Buettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Deborah Engesser
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Katherine Taylor
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Rita Canotilho
- Instituto Português do Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Olga Husson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Division of Radiotherapy, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, PN, Italy
| | - Laura Moss
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Johanna Inhestern
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Oberhavelkliniken, Hennigsdorf, Germany
| | - Guy Andry
- Surgery Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Harald Rimmele
- Bundesverband Schilddrüsenkrebs - Ohne Schilddrüse leben e. V., Berlin, Germany
| | - Naomi Kiyota
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cancer Center, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Margulies SL, Bernard A, Leone AM, Geller EJ. A Randomized Clinical Trial: Patient Satisfaction of Paper Versus Electronic Provider Feedback. UROGYNECOLOGY (PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2024; 30:181-187. [PMID: 38484230 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Minimal data compare patient satisfaction with completing paper versus electronic evaluations. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare patient satisfaction with completing paper versus electronic evaluations. Secondary objectives were assessing age, education, and socioeconomic status with comfort with technology; preference for evaluation type; and timeliness of completing evaluations. STUDY DESIGN This was a single-center randomized trial comparing paper versus electronic patient evaluations of health care providers. Study participation occurred at the end of clinic visits. RESULTS Among 145 participants, 73 (50.3%) were analyzed as paper versus 72 (49.7%) as electronic. Groups were similar in age, race, education level, income, insurance type, technology comfort, and technology use. Groups were similar in finding ease (P = 0.99) and satisfaction (P = 0.76) with their randomized method. For participants randomized to paper, 34% preferred paper, 25% preferred electronic, and 41% had no preference. Electronic feedback took longer to complete (4.5 minutes vs 3.4 minutes, P < 0.001). Older participants took longer to complete the evaluation (4.5 minutes vs 3.2 minutes, P < 0.001), had less internet use (P = 0.01), and were less likely to own a computer (P = 0.03) than younger participants. There were differences by education level for comfort with technology (P = 0.007) and internet use (P = 0.016). There were no differences in ease of feedback completion or satisfaction when comparing age, education status, or income status. CONCLUSIONS Patients were satisfied with paper and electronic health care provider evaluations, regardless of age or other demographics. Evaluations were completed quickly during visits. Requesting feedback from patients via multiple modalities is feasible in a varied patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Lee Margulies
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Urogynecology and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
| | | | - Anna M Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Elizabeth J Geller
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Urogynecology and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Consolo L, Basile I, Colombo S, Rusconi D, Pasquot L, Campa T, Caraceni A, Lusignani M. Exploring patient perspectives on electronic patient-reported outcome measures in home-based cancer palliative care: A qualitative study. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076241249962. [PMID: 38665884 PMCID: PMC11044777 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241249962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROMs) enhance symptom management and patients' engagement in palliative cancer care. However, integrating them into this setting brings challenges, including patients' familiarity with technological devices and declining health status. Prioritizing the patient's acceptability and feasibility is crucial for their adoption. However, more knowledge is needed about patients' perspectives on the adoption of ePROMs in the community, especially for home-based palliative care. Aim Explore patient viewpoints on utilizing ePROMs for symptom reporting in home-based oncology palliative care. Design A qualitative interpretative approach was used to evaluate patients' points of view on using ePROMs in this specific care setting. Semistructured interviews were carried out. Data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis. Setting/participants A total of 25 patients receiving oncological home palliative care from the advanced palliative care unit of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, Italy, were invited to participate. Twenty interviews were conducted, as five patients declined due to deteriorating health. Results Four themes were identified: (1) strategic value of ePROMs and subjective appreciation; (2) enhancing patient centeredness through ePROMs; (3) exploring and addressing concerns about the use of ePROMs and (4) intersecting factors influencing the efficacy of ePROMs. Conclusion Despite initial reticence, home palliative care patients consider ePROMs as potentially valuable allies monitoring symptoms, enhancing their quality of life, and amplifying their voices on less explored aspects of care. Continuous dialog between healthcare professionals and patients is crucial for addressing patient skepticism about ePROMs and their impact on the human aspect of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letteria Consolo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Bachelor School of Nursing, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Basile
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stella Colombo
- Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Rusconi
- Urologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Loredana Pasquot
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Campa
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Augusto Caraceni
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maura Lusignani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Casaca P, Schäfer W, Nunes AB, Sousa P. Using patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures to elevate the quality of healthcare. Int J Qual Health Care 2023; 35:mzad098. [PMID: 38113907 PMCID: PMC10750971 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Casaca
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Willemijn Schäfer
- Nivel, The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Netherlands
| | - Ana Beatriz Nunes
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Paulo Sousa
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Consolo L, Colombo S, Basile I, Rusconi D, Campa T, Caraceni A, Lusignani M. Barriers and facilitators of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) for patients in home palliative cancer care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perceptions. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:111. [PMID: 37542264 PMCID: PMC10401773 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01234-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes in palliative care enable early monitoring and management of symptoms that most impact patients' daily lives; however, there are several barriers to adopting electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures (e-PROMs) in daily practice. This study explored the experiences of health care professionals (HCPs) regarding potential barriers and facilitators in implementing e-PROMs in palliative cancer care at home. METHODS This was a qualitative descriptive study. The data were collected from two focus groups structured according to the conceptual framework of Grol. HCPs involved in home palliative cancer care of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan were enrolled. Data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS A total of 245 codes were generated, 171 for the first focus group and 74 for the second focus group. The results were subdivided into subthemes according to Grol's themes: Innovation, Individual professional, Patient, Social context, Organizational context, except Economic Political context. Nine HCPs attended the first focus group, and ten attended the second. According to these participants, e-PROMs could be integrated into clinical practice after adequate training and support of HCPs at all stages of implementation. They identified barriers, especially in the social and organizational contexts, due to the uniqueness of the oncological end-of-life setting and the intangible care interventions, as well as many facilitators for the innovation that these tools bring and for improved communication with the patient and the healthcare team. CONCLUSIONS e-PROMs are perceived by HCPs as adding value to patient care and their work; however, barriers remain especially related to the fragility of these patients, the adequacy of technological systems, lack of education, and the risk of low humanization of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letteria Consolo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
- Bachelor School of Nursing, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Stella Colombo
- Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Basile
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Rusconi
- Urology Unit, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Campa
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Augusto Caraceni
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maura Lusignani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martínez-Pérez JL, Pascual-Dapena A, Pardo Y, Ferrer M, Pont À, López MJ, Nicolau P, Jiménez M, Masó P, Vernet-Tomás M, Argudo N. Validation of the Spanish electronic version of the BREAST-Q questionnaire. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1417-1422. [PMID: 37179146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have gained considerable interest in health care moving beyond traditional outcome measures of morbidity and mortality. In breast cancer surgery, women's' perceptions of appearance, function and quality of life have become increasingly important. The BREAST-Q questionnaire is a validated PROM for use in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to validate the Spanish electronic version of the BREAST-Q questionnaire, to verify the measurement equivalence of digital and paper versions and to identify the possible disadvantages and advantages of implementing this new tool. METHODS The study population included 113 patients undergoing breast cancer survey at a single hospital in Barcelona (Spain) who were able to complete both the electronic and paper versions of the preoperative module of the BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in the four domains of the questionnaire between the two versions of the questionnaire was >0.9, with a weighted kappa of >0.74 at item level. The reliability of the internal consistency was also excellent, with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of >0.70 in all domains. Age was a limiting factor for the delivery of the electronic version of BREAST-Q, with 69 years of age as the cut-off point to obtain reliable results. CONCLUSIONS The interchangeability of the electronic and paper versions of the BREAST-Q questionnaire facilitates implementation of this instrument in routine surgical oncological practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Luis Martínez-Pérez
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Ana Pascual-Dapena
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Yolanda Pardo
- Health Services Research Unit, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; Department de Psiquiatria I Medicina legal, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - Montserrat Ferrer
- Health Services Research Unit, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - Àngels Pont
- Health Services Research Unit, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Pau Nicolau
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; Breast Diseases Unit, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Marta Jiménez
- Breast Diseases Unit, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Paula Masó
- Breast Diseases Unit, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - María Vernet-Tomás
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; Breast Diseases Unit, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Nuria Argudo
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; Breast Diseases Unit, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Scott HM, Braybrook D, Harðardóttir D, Ellis-Smith C, Harding R. Implementation of child-centred outcome measures in routine paediatric healthcare practice: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:63. [PMID: 37394520 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02143-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) are commonly used in routine adult healthcare to measure and improve outcomes, but less attention has been paid to PCOMs in children's services. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and synthesise existing evidence of the determinants, strategies, and mechanisms that influence the implementation of PCOMs into paediatric healthcare practice. METHODS The review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Databased searched included CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and PsycInfo. Google scholar was also searched for grey literature on 25th March 2022. Studies were included if the setting was a children's healthcare service, investigating the implementation or use of an outcome measure or screening tool in healthcare practice, and reported outcomes relating to use of a measure. Data were tabulated and thematically analysed through deductive coding to the constructs of the adapted-Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results were presented as a narrative synthesis, and a logic model developed. RESULTS We retained 69 studies, conducted across primary (n = 14), secondary (n = 13), tertiary (n = 37), and community (n = 8) healthcare settings, including both child self-report (n = 46) and parent-proxy (n = 47) measures. The most frequently reported barriers to measure implementation included staff lack of knowledge about how the measure may improve care and outcomes; the complexity of using and implementing the measure; and a lack of resources to support implementation and its continued use including funding and staff. The most frequently reported facilitators of implementation and continued use include educating and training staff and families on: how to implement and use the measure; the advantages of using PCOMs over current practice; and the benefit their use has on patient care and outcomes. The resulting logic model presents the mechanisms through which strategies can reduce the barriers to implementation and support the use of PCOMs in practice. CONCLUSIONS These findings can be used to support the development of context-specific implementation plans through a combination of existing strategies. This will enable the implementation of PCOMs into routine paediatric healthcare practice to empower settings to better identify and improve child-centred outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospero CRD 42022330013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah May Scott
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK.
| | - Debbie Braybrook
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| | - Daney Harðardóttir
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saleem J, Beak P, Eardley W, Trompeter A. Digitalising patient reported outcome collection tools in orthopaedic trauma-A scoping review. Injury 2023:S0020-1383(23)00426-6. [PMID: 37198045 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to provide a scoping review to the role of digital technology in the collection of orthopaedic trauma related patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley frameworks were followed. A search strategy identified relevant literature, with the identified criteria screened for acceptability for inclusion. Data was extracted to form a descriptive analysis. RESULTS Six studies met the criteria for inclusion. All were quantitative, the majority were published in the United States of America and the use of iPads was the commonest form of digital technology used. Heterogeneity existed in the type of outcomes collected between studies. All studies aimed to compare traditional methods of PROMs collection to digital methods, with an overall thematic summary suggestive of the positive impact of electronic methods of collecting patient reported outcomes. CONCLUSION This paper has demonstrated the dearth of ePROM implementation in the orthopaedic trauma setting, however its use has proved successful and therefore further evidence is needed to demonstrate its effectiveness. Furthermore, the types of PROMs in orthopaedic trauma varies significantly, and efforts to standardise the type of digital trauma PROMs used are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jawaad Saleem
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
| | - Philip Beak
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alex Trompeter
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ng VL, Dunphy C, Shemesh E, Lobritto S, Eisenberg E, Pomponi C, Szolna J, Wilkerson D, Gupta N, Romero R, Perito ER, DiPaola F, Gonzalez-Peralta RP, Hsu E, Saarela K, Mohammad S, Superina R, Logan S, Miller DW, Krise-Confair C, Swami N, Mazariegos G. Feasibility of using a patient-reported outcome measure into clinical practice following pediatric liver transplantation: The Starzl Network experience. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14409. [PMID: 36272132 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are not routinely used in clinical care by pediatric liver transplant (LT) teams. The Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation (SNEPT) assessed feasibility of using a disease-specific Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire in the ambulatory setting at 10 SNEPT sites. METHODS A mixed methods feasibility project assessing administration processes, barriers, and user experiences with the Pediatric Liver Transplant Quality of Life (PeLTQL) tool. Iterative processes sought stakeholder feedback across four phases (Pilot, Extended Pilot, Development of a Mobile App PeLTQL version, and Pilot App use). RESULTS A total of 149 patient-parent dyads completed the PeLTQL during LT clinic follow-up. Clinicians, parents, and patients evaluated and reported on feasibility of operationalization. Only two of 10 SNEPT sites continued PeLTQL administration after the initial two pilot phases. Reasons include limited clinical time and available personnel aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, a mobile application version of the PeLTQL was initiated. Providing PeLTQL responses electronically was "very easy" or "easy" as reported by 96% (22/23) parents. CONCLUSIONS Administration of a PROM into post-pediatric LT clinical care was feasible, but ongoing utilization stalled. Use of a mobile app towards facilitating completion of the PeLTQL outside of clinic hours may address the time and work-flow barriers identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Lee Ng
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Dunphy
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eyal Shemesh
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Steven Lobritto
- Columbia University Medical Center, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth Eisenberg
- Patient and Family Voice, Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Claudia Pomponi
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan Szolna
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dawn Wilkerson
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nitika Gupta
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rene Romero
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Emily R Perito
- Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Frank DiPaola
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Evelyn Hsu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Katelyn Saarela
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Saeed Mohammad
- Feinberg School of Medicine, The Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Vanderbilt Unversity Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Riccardo Superina
- Feinberg School of Medicine, The Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sherrie Logan
- Patient and Family Voice, Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel W Miller
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - George Mazariegos
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Equivalence of Paper and Electronic-Based Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Children: A Systematic Review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2023; 76:128-136. [PMID: 36240491 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000003636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) exist for a variety of chronic gastrointestinal disorders in children. The availability of electronic (e-)formats of PROMs enhance the accessibility of these tools. The International Society for Pharmacoeconomic and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) defines measurement equivalence (ME) as "comparability of the psychometric properties of data" obtained from the administration of original and adapted versions of PROMs. Consideration of proxy PROM versions is unique to pediatrics and must be included in ME evaluations. We conducted a systematic review (SR) of the literature evaluating ME of e-versions adapted from pediatric paper-based PROMs. A literature search was conducted through Medline, Embase, APA PsychInfo, and the Cochrane Library. Titles, abstracts, and manuscripts were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. The search yielded 19 studies meeting pre-defined criteria. Just over half (52.6%) of 19 PROMs were disease-specific ones. ME between paper- and e-PROM versions was reported as present in all 19 studies evaluating 5653 participants under the age of 18 years. However, only 6 (31.6%) studies evaluated ME in proxy reported e-versions. Despite the use of PROMs for children with a variety of chronic gastrointestinal disorders, only 1 study evaluated a PROM in this population (IMPACT III for inflammatory bowel disease). Findings from this SR highlight strategic opportunities for the pediatric gastroenterologist to broaden the clinical and research armamentarium to include e-PROMs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Morris AC, Ibrahim Z, Moghraby OS, Stringaris A, Grant IM, Zalewski L, McClellan S, Moriarty G, Simonoff E, Dobson RJB, Downs J. Moving from development to implementation of digital innovations within the NHS: myHealthE, a remote monitoring system for tracking patient outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231211551. [PMID: 37954687 PMCID: PMC10638880 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231211551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This paper aims to report our experience of developing, implementing, and evaluating myHealthE (MHE), a digital innovation for Child and Adolescents Mental Health Services (CAMHS), which automates the remote collection and reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) into National Health Services (NHS) electronic healthcare records. Methods We describe the logistical and governance issues encountered in developing the MHE interface with patient-identifiable information, and the steps taken to overcome these development barriers. We describe the application's architecture and hosting environment to enable its operability within the NHS, as well as the capabilities needed within the technical team to bridge the gap between academic development and NHS operational teams. Results We present evidence on the feasibility and acceptability of this system within clinical services and the process of iterative development, highlighting additional functions that were incorporated to increase system utility. Conclusion This article provides a framework with which to plan, develop, and implement automated PROM collection from remote devices back to NHS infrastructure. The challenges and solutions described in this paper will be pertinent to other digital health innovation researchers aspiring to deploy interoperable systems within NHS clinical systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C Morris
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Zina Ibrahim
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Omer S Moghraby
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Argyris Stringaris
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Emotion & Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ian M Grant
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Lukasz Zalewski
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Garry Moriarty
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emily Simonoff
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Richard JB Dobson
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
- Health Data Research UK London, University College London, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Johnny Downs
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Consolo L, Castellini G, Cilluffo S, Basile I, Lusignani M. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:102. [PMID: 36138279 PMCID: PMC9500127 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00509-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In palliative oncology settings, electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment can play an important role in supporting clinical activities for clinicians and patients. This scoping review aims to map the technological innovation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) in cancer palliative care and how PRO data collected through e-PROMs can influence the monitoring and management of symptoms and enable better communication between health professionals and patients.
Methods
A scoping review study was designed according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, PsycINFO and CINAHL and gray literature sources were consulted. The inclusion criteria were people over 18 years old receiving palliative and/or end-of-life care using e-PROMs.
Results
Thirteen primary studies were included: nine quantitative studies, two qualitative studies, and two mixed-method studies. The recently developed software that supports e-PROMs allows patients to receive feedback on their symptoms, helps clinicians prioritize care needs and monitors patients’ conditions as their symptoms change. Electronic PRO data prompt difficult, end-of-life communication between clinicians and patients to better organize care in the last phase of life.
Conclusion
This work shows that electronic PRO data assessment provides valuable tools for patients’ well-being and the management of symptoms; only one study reported conflicting results. However, with studies lacking on how clinicians can use these tools to improve communication with patients, more research is needed.
Collapse
|
14
|
Wingood M, Jones S, Gell NM, Brach JS, Peters DM. Evaluation of Electronic and Pen-and-Paper Formats of the Inventory of Physical Activity Barriers: A Randomized Crossover Study. J Phys Act Health 2022; 19:540-547. [PMID: 35894970 PMCID: PMC10080583 DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Inventory of Physical Activity Barriers (IPAB) assesses physical activity participation barriers. Development, refinement, and psychometric evaluation of the IPAB occurred via an electronic format. However, various circumstances may require using a pen-and-paper format. As instrument formats are not always interchangeable, the authors aimed to establish whether 2 different formats (electronic and pen and paper) can be used interchangeably for the IPAB. METHODS This randomized crossover study included 66 community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and older (mean age = 73 [SD = 7.6]). Half the sample completed the electronic format of the IPAB first and the pen-and-paper format second, and the other half completed them in reverse order. Tests of equivalence and a Bland-Altman plot were performed. RESULTS The intraclass correlation coefficient between formats was .94, and kappa was .68. The mean difference between the 2 administration forms of the IPAB was 0.002 (P = .96). Both administration formats had high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = .92 and .93) and illustrated construct validity (P ≤ .001 for both administration formats). CONCLUSION Pen-and-paper and electronic formats of the IPAB are equivalent and, thus, can be used interchangeably among non-Hispanic whites who are highly educated. The format should be used consistently if completing preintervention and postintervention evaluations or comparing scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Wingood
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT,USA
| | - Salene Jones
- Public Health Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA,USA
| | - Nancy M Gell
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT,USA
| | - Jennifer S Brach
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA,USA
| | - Denise M Peters
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT,USA
| |
Collapse
|